<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://my.barackobama.com">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts with the tag national security</title>
    <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/tag_rss/national+security/html</link>
    <description></description>
                        <item>
            <title>Obama’s Speech on National Security</title>
            <description>Following is a text of President Obama&amp;rsquo;s speech on Thursday on national security issues, as released by the White House.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barthson/gGxnJb</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barthson/gGxnJb/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barthson/gGxnJb</guid>
            <dc:creator>N. Julio Barthson - E-Campaign Leader</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/16dcde43db4e762efa_rem6iv05i.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>N. Julio Barthson - E-Campaign Leader</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxnJb/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>13 National Security Whistleblowers Write to President Obama</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;May 11, 2009&lt;br /&gt;President Barack H. Obama&lt;br /&gt;The White House&lt;br /&gt;1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.&lt;br /&gt;Washington, D.C. 20500&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear President Obama: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;Like millions of Americans we, the undersigned national security whistleblowers, are inspired by the bold and creative measures you have taken to put people back to work while at the same time re-engineering government to make it more responsive to people&amp;rsquo;s needs and more accountable to voters and taxpayers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;We are particularly heartened by your special relationship with America&amp;rsquo;s young people and by your call on them to make a significant contribution to their country through public service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;For those reasons and more, we write you today to ask that you take concrete steps in favor of national security whistleblowers that will help to restore time-honored values of openness, honesty and transparency to the federal service &amp;ndash; and help those entrusted with the nation&amp;rsquo;s secrets to do their jobs in a manner consistent with the public interest. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A call to public service without needed whistleblower protection can only - at some future date - put at risk those most inspired by your leadership.&amp;nbsp;We the undersigned feel we have a special bond with you and your Administration, given your long-standing support for federal employee free speech and against acts of bureaucratic retaliation against those who dare to &amp;ldquo;commit the truth.&amp;rdquo; We have been thrilled by your strong statement of support for whistleblowers, both during your presidential campaign and the transition:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled as they have been during the Bush administration. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In the years before your presidency, each one of us undertook a largely solitary battle in favor of the values we share with you and against the kind of wrongdoing that resulted in many of the American people flocking to your standard last year. And in doing so, each one of us, together with our families, and sometimes our friends and colleagues, have paid a heavy price for our ethical dissent.&lt;/p&gt;While we national security whistleblowers made critical disclosures that exposed corruption and protected life at the expense of our own careers and financial security, our federal peers took the safe route by turning a &amp;quot;blind eye&amp;quot; and remaining silent, so that their careers could advance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The steps we are asking that you take are a necessary remediation for past wrongs and would be a clear signal to those now heeding your call for service that by adhering to the standards you have so clearly embraced, they will not become &amp;ndash; as we did not so long ago &amp;ndash; victims of bureaucratic wrongdoers, who may still feel that they can get away with continued misdeeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;As the federal government of necessity grows in response to the many crises that you have inherited from your predecessor, the lack of protection currently afforded to whistleblowers means that federal workers &amp;ndash; the front line in the fight against fraud and waste, and best guarantee that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely and government works effectively &amp;ndash; must either sit on the sidelines or, still forced to look over their shoulders for signs of reprisal, risk their careers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not only did the U.S. Office of Special Counsel fall into ridicule under the stewardship of George W. Bush appointee Scott Bloch. In the last nine years, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), charged with adjudicating federal worker claims, has found only one case of illegal retaliation in 56 decisions on the merits. And only three whistleblowers out of 212 prevailed in decisions on the merits in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals since October 1994, when the current whistleblower &amp;ldquo;protection&amp;rdquo; law last was modified.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We the undersigned, national security whistleblowers from agencies across the federal government, know the special vulnerability people like us have in trying to do right by our principles and by the country we love.&amp;nbsp; And we still do not have any real safeguards against retaliation. Instead, for protecting this nation, we and others face having our security clearances yanked, as well as a rosary of humiliation, demotions, threats, punitive polygraphs and myriad other intimidatory measures. To be sure, these are meant not only to destroy our careers &amp;ndash; and in the process our physical and mental well being, our marriages and the tranquility necessary for nurturing our families in a wholesome environment. They also serve as a warning to others &amp;ndash; that the price is high, too high, and the possibility for real vindication remote. Even if Inspectors General, Congressional committees, the reputable news media, or other outside groups are fully able to corroborate our complaints, wrongdoers are mostly allowed to retain their posts - and many even receive promotions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For all that you have accomplished in little more than 100 days in office, we are sure you would agree that ensuring true transparency and accountability means the enforcement of a zero-tolerance policy for repression and retaliation, and the guaranteeing of the legal rights of every federal employee. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We urgently need a law to protect national security whistleblowers from retaliation, including those in agencies where even paper protections do not exist. We ask you to make one of your highest priorities support for whistleblower protection legislation that would end our second-class status compared to that of all other federal employees, contractors, and private sector workers who report threats to public health and safety, violations of laws or regulations, or waste, fraud and mismanagement. We also ask that you seek the criminalization of bureaucratic retaliation against whistleblowers, whose only &amp;ldquo;crime&amp;rdquo; is the exercise of their employee free speech rights for the common good.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;Finally, we respectfully request that for those of us who have lost jobs, reputations and significant professional opportunities because we stood fast in favor of the principles you maintained even before you announced your presidential candidacy, consideration be given to &amp;ldquo;making us whole&amp;rdquo; once again.&amp;nbsp; In giving us the opportunity to restore our often shattered lives, others will know that better times are in store for people who tell truth to power on behalf of the American people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With warmest best wishes to your and to your family, we remain,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Martin Edwin Andersen, &lt;/strong&gt;Former senior advisor for policy planning at the Department of Justice&amp;rsquo;s Criminal Division; Winner of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel&amp;rsquo;s 2001 &amp;ldquo;Public Servant Award&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mark Danielson, &lt;/strong&gt;Department of Energy SRT whistleblower&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michael&amp;nbsp;DeKort, &lt;/strong&gt;Former Lockheed Martin program manager/systems engineer; exposed waste, fraud and abuse on Coast Guard Deepwater program and major security/safety issues&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bogdan Dzakovic, &lt;/strong&gt;Aviation Security whistleblower regarding the 9-11 attacks, as well as current issues within the Transportation Security Administration&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard E. Hoskins II,&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Formerly of the Federal Air Marshal Service; Only Non-Air Marshal to report corrupt behavior and violations of veterans rights to the Office of Special Counsel and Congress&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Robert J. MacLean,&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Former Federal Air Marshal, U.S. Department of Homeland Security/National whistleblower liaison, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spencer A. Pickard, &lt;/strong&gt;Federal Air Marshal, U.S. Department&amp;nbsp;of Homeland Security&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Coleen Rowley, &lt;/strong&gt;Retired FBI Agent (retired 2004) and former Minneapolis FBI Division Legal Counsel&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Craig R. Sawyer, &lt;/strong&gt;Former Tier-1 level U.S. Navy SEAL Operator, decorated for &amp;quot;Heroic Service&amp;quot; in combat; &amp;quot;Original 33&amp;quot; Air Marshal and whistleblower, as an ATSAIC (manager) in the Federal Air Marshal Service, against gross mismanagement and retaliation.&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lt. Eric N. Shine, &lt;/strong&gt;Graduate of the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point [1991]; Federal maritime engineering watch officer&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;George R. Taylor, &lt;/strong&gt;U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Air Marshal Service&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Frank Terreri,&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association director of labor relations; FLEOA Federal Air Marshal Agency President&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Russell D. Tice,&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; Former&lt;/em&gt; intelligence analyst and capabilities operations officer for Special Access Programs (SAP) Information Warfare, National Security Agency (NSA)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(&lt;em&gt;Non-National Security Whistleblower Category&lt;/em&gt;)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Peter D. Nesbitt,&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;FAA Whistleblower Alliance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnyN</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnyN/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:02:01 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnyN</guid>
            <dc:creator>Martin Edwin &quot;Mick&quot; from Churchton, MD</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Martin Edwin &quot;Mick&quot; from Churchton, MD</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxnyN/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>National Security Whistleblowers&#039; letter to President Obama</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;May 11, 2009&lt;br /&gt;President Barack H. Obama&lt;br /&gt;The White House&lt;br /&gt;1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.&lt;br /&gt;Washington, D.C. 20500&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear President Obama: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;Like millions of Americans we, the undersigned national security whistleblowers, are inspired by the bold and creative measures you have taken to put people back to work while at the same time re-engineering government to make it more responsive to people&amp;rsquo;s needs and more accountable to voters and taxpayers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;We are particularly heartened by your special relationship with America&amp;rsquo;s young people and by your call on them to make a significant contribution to their country through public service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;For those reasons and more, we write you today to ask that you take concrete steps in favor of national security whistleblowers that will help to restore time-honored values of openness, honesty and transparency to the federal service &amp;ndash; and help those entrusted with the nation&amp;rsquo;s secrets to do their jobs in a manner consistent with the public interest. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A call to public service without needed whistleblower protection can only - at some future date - put at risk those most inspired by your leadership.&amp;nbsp;We the undersigned feel we have a special bond with you and your Administration, given your long-standing support for federal employee free speech and against acts of bureaucratic retaliation against those who dare to &amp;ldquo;commit the truth.&amp;rdquo; We have been thrilled by your strong statement of support for whistleblowers, both during your presidential campaign and the transition:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled as they have been during the Bush administration. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In the years before your presidency, each one of us undertook a largely solitary battle in favor of the values we share with you and against the kind of wrongdoing that resulted in many of the American people flocking to your standard last year. And in doing so, each one of us, together with our families, and sometimes our friends and colleagues, have paid a heavy price for our ethical dissent.&lt;/p&gt;While we national security whistleblowers made critical disclosures that exposed corruption and protected life at the expense of our own careers and financial security, our federal peers took the safe route by turning a &amp;quot;blind eye&amp;quot; and remaining silent, so that their careers could advance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The steps we are asking that you take are a necessary remediation for past wrongs and would be a clear signal to those now heeding your call for service that by adhering to the standards you have so clearly embraced, they will not become &amp;ndash; as we did not so long ago &amp;ndash; victims of bureaucratic wrongdoers, who may still feel that they can get away with continued misdeeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;As the federal government of necessity grows in response to the many crises that you have inherited from your predecessor, the lack of protection currently afforded to whistleblowers means that federal workers &amp;ndash; the front line in the fight against fraud and waste, and best guarantee that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely and government works effectively &amp;ndash; must either sit on the sidelines or, still forced to look over their shoulders for signs of reprisal, risk their careers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not only did the U.S. Office of Special Counsel fall into ridicule under the stewardship of George W. Bush appointee Scott Bloch. In the last nine years, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), charged with adjudicating federal worker claims, has found only one case of illegal retaliation in 56 decisions on the merits. And only three whistleblowers out of 212 prevailed in decisions on the merits in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals since October 1994, when the current whistleblower &amp;ldquo;protection&amp;rdquo; law last was modified.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We the undersigned, national security whistleblowers from agencies across the federal government, know the special vulnerability people like us have in trying to do right by our principles and by the country we love.&amp;nbsp; And we still do not have any real safeguards against retaliation. Instead, for protecting this nation, we and others face having our security clearances yanked, as well as a rosary of humiliation, demotions, threats, punitive polygraphs and myriad other intimidatory measures. To be sure, these are meant not only to destroy our careers &amp;ndash; and in the process our physical and mental well being, our marriages and the tranquility necessary for nurturing our families in a wholesome environment. They also serve as a warning to others &amp;ndash; that the price is high, too high, and the possibility for real vindication remote. Even if Inspectors General, Congressional committees, the reputable news media, or other outside groups are fully able to corroborate our complaints, wrongdoers are mostly allowed to retain their posts - and many even receive promotions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For all that you have accomplished in little more than 100 days in office, we are sure you would agree that ensuring true transparency and accountability means the enforcement of a zero-tolerance policy for repression and retaliation, and the guaranteeing of the legal rights of every federal employee. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We urgently need a law to protect national security whistleblowers from retaliation, including those in agencies where even paper protections do not exist. We ask you to make one of your highest priorities support for whistleblower protection legislation that would end our second-class status compared to that of all other federal employees, contractors, and private sector workers who report threats to public health and safety, violations of laws or regulations, or waste, fraud and mismanagement. We also ask that you seek the criminalization of bureaucratic retaliation against whistleblowers, whose only &amp;ldquo;crime&amp;rdquo; is the exercise of their employee free speech rights for the common good.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;Finally, we respectfully request that for those of us who have lost jobs, reputations and significant professional opportunities because we stood fast in favor of the principles you maintained even before you announced your presidential candidacy, consideration be given to &amp;ldquo;making us whole&amp;rdquo; once again.&amp;nbsp; In giving us the opportunity to restore our often shattered lives, others will know that better times are in store for people who tell truth to power on behalf of the American people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoBodyText&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With warmest best wishes to your and to your family, we remain,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Martin Edwin Andersen, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Former senior advisor for policy planning at the Department of Justice&amp;rsquo;s Criminal Division; Winner of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel&amp;rsquo;s 2001 &amp;ldquo;Public Servant Award&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mark Danielson, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Department of Energy SRT whistleblower&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michael&amp;nbsp;DeKort, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Former Lockheed Martin program manager/systems engineer; exposed waste, fraud and abuse on Coast Guard Deepwater program and major security/safety issues&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bogdan Dzakovic, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Aviation Security whistleblower regarding the 9-11 attacks, as well as current issues within the Transportation Security Administration&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard E. Hoskins II,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Formerly of the Federal Air Marshal Service; Only Non-Air Marshal to report corrupt behavior and violations of veterans rights to the Office of Special Counsel and Congress&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Robert J. MacLean,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Former Federal Air Marshal, U.S. Department of Homeland Security/National whistleblower liaison, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spencer A. Pickard, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Federal Air Marshal, U.S. Department&amp;nbsp;of Homeland Security&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Coleen Rowley, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Retired FBI Agent (retired 2004) and former Minneapolis FBI Division Legal Counsel&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Craig R. Sawyer, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Former Tier-1 level U.S. Navy SEAL Operator, decorated for &amp;quot;Heroic Service&amp;quot; in combat; &amp;quot;Original 33&amp;quot; Air Marshal and whistleblower, as an ATSAIC (manager) in the Federal Air Marshal Service, against gross mismanagement and retaliation.&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lt. Eric N. Shine, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Graduate of the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point [1991]; Federal maritime engineering watch officer&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;George R. Taylor, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Air Marshal Service&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Frank Terreri,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association director of labor relations; FLEOA Federal Air Marshal Agency President&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Russell D. Tice,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Former&lt;/em&gt; intelligence analyst and capabilities operations officer for Special Access Programs (SAP) Information Warfare, National Security Agency (NSA)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(&lt;em&gt;Non-National Security Whistleblower Category&lt;/em&gt;)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Peter D. Nesbitt,&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;FAA Whistleblower Alliance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnPp</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnPp/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:21:06 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/martinedwinandersen/gGxnPp</guid>
            <dc:creator>Martin Edwin &quot;Mick&quot; from Churchton, MD</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Martin Edwin &quot;Mick&quot; from Churchton, MD</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxnPp/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Accountability: America&#039;s Moral Responsibility to Humanity</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BENEATH THE SPIN &amp;bull; ERIC L. WATTREE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Accountability: America&#039;s Moral Responsibility to Humanity&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eight years of Republican &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; has left America both economically devastated, and globally humiliated. Yet, far from apologizing for the damage that they&#039;ve done to the stability and image of this great nation, instead, they&#039;ve circled their wagons and gone into damage control mode&amp;ndash;not to control the damage that they&#039;ve done to the nation, but in an attempt to rewrite history in order to control the damage that they&#039;ve done to themselves. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So now, as President Obama goes about the business of desperately trying to return America to its former position of economic stability at home, and respect, admiration, and moral authority abroad, the GOP leadership seems to be completely oblivious to the nation&#039;s desperate and immediate need for a concerted effort in that regard. They&#039;re like clueless children who find it impossible to see the big picture. Thus, at this point it has become abundantly clear that their primary concern is not with restoring America to a sound footing in the world, but rather, simply restoring themselves to power at any cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wattree/gGxcrP</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wattree/gGxcrP/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:51:12 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wattree/gGxcrP</guid>
            <dc:creator>Eric from Covina, CA</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Eric from Covina, CA</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxcrP/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>They May Speak English, But We&#039;re Still &#039;The Other&#039;</title>
            <description>Matthew Yglesias, commenting on an article by Spencer Ackerman, thinks lack of knowledge of Afghanistan&#039;s languages is &amp;quot;the Achilles heel of the American imperial project.&amp;quot; I think that overlooks &lt;a href=&quot;http://signsanssignified.blogspot.com/2009/03/they-may-speak-english-but-were-still.html&quot; title=&quot;the most important point&quot;&gt;the most important point&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGxxf5</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGxxf5/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:38:56 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGxxf5</guid>
            <dc:creator>signsSansSignifieds</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/3244b5158a688ee0f9_81kgmvi5t.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>signsSansSignifieds</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxxf5/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>TCS (Taxpayers for Common Sense) on National Security Spending in the 2010 Budget</title>
            <description>&lt;img XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 10px; float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://taxpayer.net/images/tcs.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;National Security Spending in the 2010 Budget&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Pub Date: Feb 27, 2009&lt;br /&gt;   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Though the topline numbers in the Obama administration&amp;rsquo;s national security budget for 2010 may not make headlines, there&amp;rsquo;s a lot of newsworthy moving and shaking happening beneath the surface. The budget gives the Defense Department $533.7 billion, $20.4 billion more than last year but only a two percent jump when adjusted for inflation. However, President Obama has said several programs are on the chopping block, warning just days ago he would cut &amp;ldquo;Cold War-era weapons systems we don&amp;rsquo;t use.&amp;rdquo; The White House also claims the budget has absorbed some programs funded for the last five years in the wartime supplementals, such as security support for foreign governments and some medical programs. Another $75.5 billion supplemental was also released today, bringing Fiscal Year 2009&amp;rsquo;s war spending tab to more than $142 billion when combined with the $66 billion supplemental passed last fall. Another $130 billion war funding boost is penciled in for 2010, but the administration says supplementals will eventually be phased out altogether.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Energy Department&amp;rsquo;s budget flatlines at $26.3 billion, though nuclear weapons spending is not broken out. Green energy initiatives get a big increase, according to the White House. Nuclear nonproliferation and cleanup programs also get more money, as do programs to extend the life of existing warheads. The Reliable Replacement Warhead&amp;mdash;a Bush administration program to rebuild nuclear warheads&amp;mdash;is singled out for elimination.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Homeland Security also stays relatively flat at $42.7 billion&amp;mdash;only $500 million more than 2009&amp;mdash;but the budget brags about more than $100 million in new spending on Transportation Department and Transportation Security Administration programs. The real winner is the State Department, which gets $51.7 million&amp;mdash;a 40 percent increase from 2009. Foreign aid is &amp;ldquo;on a path&amp;rdquo; to double in size, and global health, USAID and the Foreign Service will all grow. The budget also funds the launch of a new &amp;ldquo;multi-year counterterrorism and law enforcement assistance program.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;for more information &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:laura@taxpayer.net&quot;&gt;contact&lt;/a&gt; Laura Peterson&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxpayer.net/resources.php?action=Wastebasket&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.taxpayer.net/user_uploads/image/buttons/signup.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;32&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Enter your Email:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://capwiz.com/taxpayer/mlm/signup/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.taxpayer.net/user_uploads/image/buttons/subscribe.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;58&quot; height=&quot;22&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fib/gGxR3W</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fib/gGxR3W/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:57:02 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fib/gGxR3W</guid>
            <dc:creator>Fire Is Born</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/c9dd8f966f92de5366_45m6be3ir.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Fire Is Born</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxR3W/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Pay the Bill and Keep the CHANGE</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s be honest. We didn&amp;rsquo;t really expect Congress to come up with a &amp;quot;bold&amp;quot; stimulus plan, did we? But do we agree that NO action will only aggravate our current crisis? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://inlinethumb55.webshots.com/44086/2696507530099857684S200x200Q85.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Obama and McCain at Bipartisan Dinner&quot; title=&quot;Obama and McCain at Bipartisan Dinner&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;The GOP surprised us when it failed to respond more constructively to the bipartisan overture from Barack Obama. I personally witnessed the precedent-setting bipartisan dinner for his defeated opponent (my photo of the President-elect at the dinner honoring McCain, January 19) and noted the subsequent meetings with Congressional Republicans. And what did we get in the way of proposals from the loyal opposition? More of the dogma-driven, supply-side ideology that contributed to our current mess: tax cuts! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, GOP critics have a point: the bill that passed the House and was embraced by Obama essentially is an accumulation of favorite Democratic spending proposals. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is missing is CHANGE. The CHANGE Obama advocated in his campaign for the Presidency. The CHANGE that won him a resounding mandate to govern for four years. The CHANGE from policies that have worked to benefit few and imperil many. Where are the first steps toward affordable health care, a sustainable green economy and alternative energy? And why are we not moving boldly to address the systemic failures that underlie the current crisis in credit markets? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama asked for ideas.  And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=3&amp;amp;ref=opinion&quot;&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/01/stimulus-how-to-create-jobs-without.html&quot;&gt;Robert Reich&lt;/a&gt;, among others, obliged. But what these brilliant men offer is predictable: rationales for orthodox Keynesian solutions and concern about labor market distortions, respectively. More is needed, not just in additional spending, but in fresh ideas that advance the President&#039;s policy agenda. So, if suggestions are still welcomed, here is my two-cents worth. And please do keep the CHANGE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health Care &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama has promised the nation affordable health care similar to his own Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), to be available to all by the end of his first term. There is no need to back off this goal. Health care is one of the largest drags on our economy and the stimulus bill provides a real opportunity to begin managing its cost. In addition to the bill&amp;rsquo;s provisions to help state governments fund Medicare and work projects, I suggest that the federal government reimburse all state and local governments for their employer&#039;s share of health care for the rest of this year. In exchange, recipients may not fire government workers and must commit to integrating their health care plans with the existing FEHBP starting in 2010. That provides additional and immediate financial assistance to state and local governments, while paving the way for the establishment of a Public Employees Health Benefits Program. By January 2010, the federal government&amp;rsquo;s negotiated health care program would expand its base and economies of scale. The next step will be to apply the system to businesses, and subsequently to capture the un- and under-insured. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Energy Independence&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most honest leaders recognize that in due course government will have to produce the substantial additional revenue to pay for the stimulus.&amp;nbsp; But good luck finding a politician willing to propose increasing taxes of any kind. So let me suggest instead a hefty tariff on imported oil to fund the &amp;ldquo;green economy.&amp;rdquo; A tariff of 50 percent or more on the landed cost of all imported energy (probably with some form of accommodation for our NAFTA partners) can be justified because of national security as well as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eoearth.org/article/Externality&quot;&gt;external costs&lt;/a&gt; to our environment inherent in the use of fossil fuels. And such a levy would promote conservation, subsidize domestic production, and help to fund and protect our investments in alternative energy. This is a measure that should be welcomed by Republicans who advocate &amp;quot;drill, baby, drill&amp;rdquo; as well as environmentalists interested in promoting clean energy. The windfall earned by American producers could be invested domestically or taxed as profits. And while there may be a marginal increase of fuel cost at the pump, it will pale in comparison with the amounts we forked over to foreign potentates rather than our own Treasury these past few years, when oil was effectively 200% greater than its current price. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reestablish a &amp;lsquo;Risk-Free&amp;rsquo; Investment Benchmark  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Explanations for our current credit crisis and financial market meltdown abound, including the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/&quot;&gt;Washington Post&#039;s excellent series&lt;/a&gt;.  But absent from all the expert analyses is any mention of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20060209&amp;amp;slug=longbond09&quot;&gt;Treasury Department&#039;s October 2001 decision&lt;/a&gt; to discontinue issuing 30-year Bonds. That decision, on the heels of 9/11 and the cusp of Bush&#039;s costly war on terror, both lowered mortgage yields and prompted increased sales of bundled mortgages marketed as alternative &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_risk&quot;&gt;&#039;risk-free&#039; instruments&lt;/a&gt;, which in turn fueled the housing bubble and distorted both government and corporate credit point spreads. Treasury Bond auctions have resumed, but a clear provision to finance America&amp;rsquo;s recovery through borrowing would repair yield spreads &amp;ndash; both between short and long term sovereign debt and in relation to all other debt instruments. Transparent budget financing will help re-establish more realistic risk pricing and global confidence in the US economy. But the 30-year Bond will not regain its position as a benchmark for &#039;risk-free&#039; long-term investment if Fed meddling in the market, as it proposes to do with its planned purchase of Treasuries from troubled banks. In fact, this central-bankers-gone-wild approach will only create a greater Treasury bubble that will seriously aggravate our problems.&amp;nbsp; Once markets are allowed to properly price the cost and risk of our recovery without Fed manipulation, global confidence in the US economy has a chance to be recover. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So Pay the Bill, and Keep the CHANGE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Barack Obama attended his last inaugural event, the Staff Ball, at the DC Armory on January 21. But he arrived after a performance by the opening act, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drYA9r59VqQ&quot;&gt;Arcade Fire.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So here are some insightful lysircs from their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/3530822107858539095/&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Intervention&amp;rdquo;&lt;/a&gt;:	  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://inlinethumb57.webshots.com/20408/2993309940099857684S200x200Q85.jpg&quot; border=&quot;3&quot; alt=&quot;Arcade Fire at the Staff Ball&quot; title=&quot;Arcade Fire at the Staff Ball&quot; width=&quot;160&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You say it&#039;s money that we need &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As if we&#039;re only mouths to feed &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know no matter what you say &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are some debts you&#039;ll never pay &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The message is relevant to the stimulus bill now before Congress.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can act responsibly and cautiously if we: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pay the Bill and Keep the CHANGE.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/markwiznitzer/gGxHtV</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/markwiznitzer/gGxHtV/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:17:11 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/markwiznitzer/gGxHtV</guid>
            <dc:creator>Mark Wiznitzer</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/047408751daa860155_omm6bhy1b.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Mark Wiznitzer</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxHtV/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Nuclear Energy: A Boon To The Environment, Economy, And National Security And How To Make It Safer</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;According to recent polls, voters believe that solving our energy problem is the nation&#039;s&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; second-highest priority. Eighty-two percent&amp;nbsp; think it is &amp;ldquo;very important.&amp;rdquo; Only the financial crisis ranks higher in voter concern.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At present, of course, we are highly dependent for energy on imported&amp;nbsp; oil whose price we cannot control. To pay for it, we send vast sums to nations that are not our friends.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Even though, the price of oil is relatively low at present,it cannot stay that way, because the world is exhausting the &amp;ldquo;easy&amp;rdquo; sources of oil. More oil is available, but in locations and forms that will be increasingly difficult and expensive to obtain.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQC</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQC/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:28 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQC</guid>
            <dc:creator>Janice C. from Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Janice C. from Chicago, IL</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxHQC/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>National Security and Foreign Affairs</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The National Security and Foreign Affairs (NSFA) sub-committee of Team Obama Hyde Park is engaged in the following: (1. Participating in Camp Hope which is &amp;quot;Organized by a coalition of social justice, religious and peace organizations from the Chicago area, Camp Hope&#039;s goal is to remind President-elect Obama of the progressive themes he sounded in his campaign and urge him to follow through with policy changes when he takes office later this month&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://camphope2009.org/&quot; title=&quot;http://camphope2009.org/&quot;&gt;http://camphope2009.org/&lt;/a&gt;) Among the sessions members are attending are:Discussion Withdrawal of Troops from Iraq; Jan. 7, &amp;nbsp;Myths and Realities about U.S. in Afghanistan; Jan. 10, Witness Against Torture Reform; Jan.11,&amp;nbsp; The Gaza Crisis; Jan. 14.&amp;nbsp;(2. Arranging presentations to community groups of the state of readiness of Hyde Park to respond to a natural or man-made disaster.&amp;nbsp;We will be working with the Red Cross (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usa.redcross.org/)&amp;nbsp;&quot;&gt;http://www.usa.redcross.org/)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; and others with an emphasis on educating the public on preparedness.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sharon Klopner, Committee Chair&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQ5</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQ5/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:12:31 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/HydePark53rdSt60615/gGxHQ5</guid>
            <dc:creator>Janice C. from Chicago, IL</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Janice C. from Chicago, IL</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxHQ5/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Protecting our wetlands ~ A new village at 10,000 feet?</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The following regards a local issue with national implications.&amp;nbsp; The shameful saga began in the Reagan Year&#039;s, perpetrated by Reagan cronies.&amp;nbsp; The history can be found at www.&lt;strong&gt;friendsofwolfcreek&lt;/strong&gt;.org.&amp;nbsp; In any event, the developer was stopped.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Now he is planning his next step ~ I submit it is appropriate for citizens to help inform his thinking.............&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; please read on&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear Editor,&lt;br /&gt;Let me share a few reasons why Red McCombs should abandon his dream of a Village at Wolf Creek and return his ill-gotten parcel of Alberta Park to the Rio Grande National Forest.&amp;nbsp; Thereby leaving a legacy proclaiming: here was a man who learned to appreciate the deeper value of his land, a man who had the insight to see its down to earth necessity for future generations ~ along with the generosity to secure that biological treasure that is Alberta Park for those future generations. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Alberta Park is at 10,000 elevation, it receives some of this country&amp;rsquo;s biggest snowfalls, it is 200 miles from the nearest large population centers, and thousands from the shrinking money capable of buying into such speculative ventures.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Economic winds have shifted.&amp;nbsp; Current events are proving that the Reaganomics Faith, upon which the Village at Wolf Creek was conceived, is actually an illusion that hides cruel balloon payment liabilities.&amp;nbsp; The Village, in any form, is simply not viable in the coming economic upheaval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Climatic winds are shifting.&amp;nbsp; Water storage and supply issues are going to take on greater urgency in a drier Southwest.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Alberta Park currently functions as a key component in a vast nearly pristine watershed.&amp;nbsp; A component that serves vital biological, life sustaining functions.&amp;nbsp; Such as holding and filtering water used in countless ways by millions of down stream Rio Grande River stakeholders.&amp;nbsp; It is also a linchpin to wildlife migration.&amp;nbsp; Given the habitat loss this past half century, any remaining parcels we can spare need to be protected - we can&amp;rsquo;t rebuild them.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Alberta Park: its hydrologic, biologic and wildlife resource&amp;rsquo;s are worthy of being seen as National Security Items.&amp;nbsp; (For more background on the value of wetlands visit:&amp;nbsp; www.waterinfo.org/&amp;nbsp; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, Red McCombs is back to the starting gate with his VWC development plans.&amp;nbsp; Currently, they remain silent about future strategies - it can be assumed there are discussions about how realistic going ahead is.&amp;nbsp; That means the table is open to suggestions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regarding Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture, consider this.&amp;nbsp; These people, rather brochures, assure us they can build a viable village, at ten thousand feet, under some of the nations greatest snowfall, along with all the tremendous infrastructure a running town needs.&amp;nbsp; Yet, try finding them in the Yellow Pages, Texas, Colorado, nothing.&amp;nbsp; Look up the Better Business Bureau, nothing.&amp;nbsp; They can be found on the web, but their website is way out of date &amp;amp; no contact address.&amp;nbsp; LMJV seems to be a virtual company.&amp;nbsp; Nothing wrong in that.&amp;nbsp; But, do you want to trust a virtual company to build and maintain your town?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you agree the VWC makes no sense, and if it matters to you.&amp;nbsp; Now is one of those rare moments when some grassroots action could actually make a big difference.&amp;nbsp; Quick, before new commitments are made!&amp;nbsp; Write the man himself.&amp;nbsp; A polite, reasoned, plea, or argument explaining why he should create the Billy Red McCombs Watershed Preserve.&amp;nbsp; )&amp;nbsp; Since LMJV is elusive here are some addresses that trace to Mr. McCombs himself:&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;McCombs Enterprises&lt;br /&gt;755 E Mulberry Ave&amp;nbsp; #100&lt;br /&gt;San Antonio, TX 78212&lt;br /&gt;210-821-6523&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Red McCombs Media&lt;br /&gt;6207 Sheridan Avenue, Suite 200&lt;br /&gt;Austin, Texas 78723 &lt;br /&gt;http://www.redmccombsmedia.com/us/contact-us&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clear Channel&lt;br /&gt;200 East Basse Road&lt;br /&gt;San Antonio, TX 78209&lt;br /&gt;lisacdollinger@clearchannel.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Imagine if Mr. McCombs received lots of letters lobbying him to establish a wetland - biological preserve - bet it would have an impact.&amp;nbsp; Send a copy to each address.&amp;nbsp; A stitch in time may save nine ;-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;printed in the Duragno Telegraph 12-18-8 &lt;br /&gt;http://citizenschallenge.blogspot.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/citizenschallenge/gGx82c</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/citizenschallenge/gGx82c/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:52:50 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/citizenschallenge/gGx82c</guid>
            <dc:creator>peterm</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>peterm</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGx82c/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Last week, at a meeting of his country’s ruling party, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak accused Iran of “trying to devour the Arab states.”</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/16/iran-ate-my-caliphate/&quot; title=&quot;Iran ate my Caliphate&quot;&gt;Iran ate my Caliphate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Posted on December 16, 2008 by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/author/jeff-huber/&quot; title=&quot;Posts by Jeff Huber&quot;&gt;Jeff Huber&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;@ scholarsandrogues&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_B4tIdoEMuy4/SUW1hcC1MUI/AAAAAAAAAYU/FU4x0HTk9RY/s1600-h/Anti-Egypt-Protest-Tehran1.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;aligncenter&quot; src=&quot;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_B4tIdoEMuy4/SUW1hcC1MUI/AAAAAAAAAYU/FU4x0HTk9RY/s400/Anti-Egypt-Protest-Tehran1.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last week, at a meeting of his country&amp;rsquo;s ruling party, Egyptian President &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1228728151219&amp;amp;pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hosni Mubarak&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; accused Iran of &amp;ldquo;trying to devour the Arab states.&amp;rdquo; Don&amp;rsquo;t worry, Hosni. Iran won&amp;rsquo;t eat you. It can&amp;rsquo;t. It can&amp;rsquo;t sit on you either. It&amp;rsquo;s too far away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What led Mubarak to say such a mean thing about Iran? Well, it seems that a bunch of Iranian students shouted a bunch of mean things at the Egyptian embassy in Tehran, including their apparently genuine wish that someone would hang Mubarak. The Iranian students shouted mean things about Mubarak because Egypt wouldn&amp;rsquo;t let the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jta.org/news/article/2008/12/10/1001451/irans-red-crescent-will-send-ship&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iranian Red Crescent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; sneak around Israel&amp;rsquo;s blockade of the Gaza strip and deliver food and supplies to Palestinians, who have been reduced to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/14/gazans-turn-to-painkiller_n_150862.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;eating grass&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.........&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ENTIRE ARTICLE - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/16/iran-ate-my-caliphate/&quot;&gt;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/16/iran-ate-my-caliphate/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnlewisdickerson/gGx8h2</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnlewisdickerson/gGx8h2/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:53:21 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnlewisdickerson/gGx8h2</guid>
            <dc:creator>John Lewis-Dickerson, Atlanta</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/7efd781a64637bc28e_3gm6bn3pw.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>John Lewis-Dickerson, Atlanta</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGx8h2/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Senator John McCain&#039;s National Security Failures and Moral Failures</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Set aside for the moment the fact that more terrorists are being trained by fundamental and radical extremists than now ever before and that there is more support for terrorists among the growing population of fundamentalists and radicals than ever before.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Set aside for the moment the fact that Iran, who was labeled as an Axis of Evil, has greater influence in Iraq and the Middle East now than at any time prior to the War in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Set aside for the moment the fact that U.S. foreign aide has been misappropriated and misused by those who received it for purposes of terrorism.&amp;nbsp; The late Mujahideen Commander Nek Mohammed was bribed with U.S. foreign aide money that he requested to repay his loans from al Qaeda.&amp;nbsp; It has been alleged that the attack on an Indian Embassy and perhaps the more recent attacks within India were financed by the Pakistani ISI with U.S. foreign aide.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Set aside for the moment the fact that the threat is greater now than ever that terrorist will acquire multiple nuclear weapons in Pakistan as opposed to just a dirty bomb.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;How do the Republican Party and Senator John McCain justify heinous and reprehensible acts by fellow Republicans, which threatened National Security and may have influenced the actions of the White House in an international incident?&amp;nbsp; Notwithstanding the issue of their age and gender, which is made all the more evident by testaments to that individuals frequenting an infamous child bordello in Thailand, how do the Republican Party and Senator John McCain justify a fellow Republican accepting enslaved Thai Prostitutes from the son of a now disgraced communist leader?&amp;nbsp; Did their knowledge of his actions limit the response of his Republican family member during an international crisis?&amp;nbsp; Did their knowledge of his actions limit the response of his Republican family member during a National Security threat?&amp;nbsp; For those who have faith, each persons God&#039;s ultimate assesment of our lives occcurs on the day of reckoning.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Your god&amp;nbsp;may have had the first of many last laughs on the person who accepted the enslaved Thai Prostitutes, although one must sympathize with his former wife.&amp;nbsp; That person became infected with an incurable sexually transmitted disease.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Indiscretions such as these are generally supposed to be considered a potential threat to National Security when considering others for security clearance, but this has not always been the case.&amp;nbsp; The Department of Defense (DOD), including the military and other federal agencies has overlooked illegal and immoral indiscretions in the past.&amp;nbsp; DOD helped an underage Philippine female immigrate to the United States to marry a former Marine Aviator, who was once employed by the contractor at USAF Plant No. 4 and once in the reserve.&amp;nbsp; When she revealed at a Christmas Party that she was an underage bride, his security clearance was not revoked.&amp;nbsp; DOD, including the USAF, and the Senate Armed Services Committee overlooked the access by employees of the contractor at USAF Plant No. 4 of child pornography on the World Wide Web.&amp;nbsp; They destroyed evidence on individual computers, but they were so ignorant in their obstruction of justice that they forgot to destroy evidence on mainframes and servers.&amp;nbsp; Their security clearances were not revoked.&amp;nbsp; DOD, including the USAF, and the Senate Armed Services Committee ignored visits by defense contractor and some military personnel to child bordellos in South Korea and Thailand among other nations.&amp;nbsp; Some employees openly bragged about their visits to the parlors, which were staffed with underage child prostitutes.&amp;nbsp; Their security clearances were not revoked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I would not feel safer with Senator John McCain in the White House at any level.&amp;nbsp; He has already demonstrated for me his failure to lead at any level.&amp;nbsp; He has already demonstrated his failure to lead morally.&amp;nbsp; He has already demonstrated his failure to lead in matters of National Security.&amp;nbsp; He has already demonstrated his ability to lead use into the most serious economic crisis of the last 100 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/patriotforobama/gGx3d8</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/patriotforobama/gGx3d8/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:43:25 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/patriotforobama/gGx3d8</guid>
            <dc:creator>Patriot for Obama</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Patriot for Obama</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGx3d8/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>AMERICA IN THE YEAR 2016</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I had a dream:&amp;nbsp; We are writing the year 2016, America has left behind the economy crisis of 2008 and developed to a green, social and prosperous society. The unemployment rate is down at 2.3 %, the number of poor people dropped from 37 to 9 million, the national deficit is only a fourth of that in 2008. Every American has affordable health care now, and Obama`s tax cuts have put more money into the pockets of the middle-class American, which led to higher consumption, re-fueled the economy, and created millions of new jobs. Above all 5 million new created green collar jobs and a better, more effective environmental policy with solar, wind and other renewable energies dropped America`s energy bill, air pollution and CO 2 balance by 25%, making the country cleaner and almost independent of foreign oil. America&amp;acute;s is about to become the world leader in green technology, especially due to the broad-scale introduction of US built hybrid cars. In foreign politics America has restored faith and regained respect in the world community of nations as a wise and peaceful mediator in all conflicts. This and other measures also led to an improvement of the national security. The dark Bush years are history and America has made the real CHANGE to a better future - YES WE COULD - And due to the great achievements of Barack Obama`s successful 8 years in national and international politics a committee was founded, proposing the extension of his presidency for 4 more years, as applied during the Roosevelt administration. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Was all of this just a dream ? - No, you can make it happen by voting for OBAMA next Tuesday - It is now up to you, America !&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/shop_america/651528&quot; title=&quot;SHOP AMERICA FOR OBAMA&quot;&gt;SHOP AMERICA SUPPORTS OBAMA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/shop_america/651528&quot; title=&quot;SHOP AMERICA FOR OBAMA&quot;&gt;SHOP AMERICA SUPPORTS OBAMA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cafepress.com/shop_america/651528&quot; title=&quot;SHOP AMERICA FOR OBAMA&quot;&gt;SHOP AMERICA SUPPORTS OBAMA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barckobama2009/gGgz4H</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barckobama2009/gGgz4H/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:02:06 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barckobama2009/gGgz4H</guid>
            <dc:creator>Peter from Portland, OR</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Peter from Portland, OR</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgz4H/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The One!</title>
            <description>McCain dismissively referred to Barack as &amp;quot;that one&amp;quot; in Tuesday night&amp;rsquo;s debate. In my mind Obama is THE ONE: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that can restore America&#039;s position in the world through positive engagement with global organizations and an increased emphasis on humanitarian outreach through organizations like the Peace Corps.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that understands that an economic recovery is rooted in helping the middle class not billionaires and big oil companies.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that has provided and continues to provide steady and consistent leadership throughout the government debate over the&amp;nbsp;economic rescue plan.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that will place an emphasis on reducing the impact the US has on global warming through a comprehensive understanding of the causes.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that realizes we cannot drill our way out of the energy crisis; that investing in renewable resources helps the economy, provides jobs, and reduces our impact on global warming.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that supports health care as a right for all citizens&amp;nbsp;not a burden too costly for Americans.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that believes running an honorable campaign devoid of lies and negative attacks.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in&quot;&gt;The one candidate that will get my vote in November.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/timanderson/gGgKQt</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/timanderson/gGgKQt/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:03:03 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/timanderson/gGgKQt</guid>
            <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/7bf76b5178ad0595c7_pcbmv2all.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Tim</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgKQt/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Michigan Congressman Joe Knollenberg on Sarah Palin&#039;s national security experience</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freep.com/article/20081008/NEWS06/81008099&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;article&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt; in yesterday&#039;s Detroit Free Press, &amp;quot;Knollenberg pushes [Gary] Peters on what-if vote on bailout,&amp;quot; Congressman Joe Knollenberg is quoted as saying, about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;[She] obviously is someone who is very much involved in national security because Alaska touches very closely to Russia.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I can understand the governor of Texas knowing something about Mexico, given their long common border, but Alaska and Russia? Is there ferry service across the Bering Straits that I don&#039;t know about? Are governors in the chain of command of our federal intelligence agencies?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This shows once again how out-of-touch Joe Knollenberg is. It is time to retire him to Oakland County. I&#039;ll be the first to concede that he does know a lot about localities near his home in Bloomfield Township. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gary Peters is running against eight-term incumbent Joe Knollenberg in Michigan&#039;s 9th Congressional district. It is a tight race, and Democrats are hoping to pick up the seat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gregorybachelis/gGgKvs</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gregorybachelis/gGgKvs/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:19:05 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gregorybachelis/gGgKvs</guid>
            <dc:creator>mathpol</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/c00ec415a75416fd1e_jc4mv2gtf.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>mathpol</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgKvs/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Vote for McCain, or You&#039;re an Idiot</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;After two debates, I wonder how I ever imagined that Senator McCain could lead this country. While I agree with a few points McCain has made where healthcare is concerned, even when I agree with him, I find myself wanting to oppose him. His condescension and ridicule of Senator Obama is so repugnant, that even if I agreed with him on every point, I&#039;d find it difficult to vote for him. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having said that, I wish Senator Obama would make a few of the most obvious rebuttals of McCain&#039;s most egregious charges:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senator McCain invoked Theodore Roosevelt&#039;s famous aphorism: &amp;quot;Speak softly, but carry a big stick.&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The truth is, Senator McCain has been the oracle of tough talk, while his policies have decimated our military, to the point where repeated requests by our commanders in Afghanistan for reinforcements have gone unanswered. McCain criticized Obama for not making a strong enough condemnation of Russia when it invaded the former Soviet Republic of Georgia. Unfortunately, Senator McCain&#039;s loud (and some would say blustering) condemnation of the Russian invasion did nothing but underscore the fact that the United States was in no position to do anything about it. Why? If we can&#039;t reinforce our own troops in Afghanistan, how could any of the countries neighboring Russia consider relying upon US support for their independence?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senator McCain continues to make the false assertion that Obama won&#039;t admit that &#039;The Surge&#039; was successful.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In fact, Senator Obama has acknowledged the success of one of the strategic changes made by our military as part of the so-called &#039;Surge&#039;, namely, allowing our military to pursue what is generally referred to as the &amp;quot;clear and hold&amp;quot; strategy, wherein our troops secure individual urban neighborhoods, and then support Iraqi soldiers who clear their own neighborhoods of insurgents. What Senator McCain doesn&#039;t mention (and may not even know) is that this strategy was proposed by our military two years earlier, and overruled by the Commander in Chief, George W. Bush. The reason the Surge was initiated was in response to the massive opposition to President Bush&#039;s handling of the war.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senator McCain wants us to believe that he&#039;s the only candidate who knows how to win the hearts and minds of the Afghani people, and stabilize that country.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In fact, the single biggest factor contributing to the erosion of our position in Afghanistan is that the Afghani people do not believe the Americans will continue to support them in opposition to the Taliban. They have watched us put the Afghanistan campaign on the far back burner while we have poured resources into Iraq. With complete justification, the ordinary Afghani person must be wondering what may happen when the US and NATO forces leave, and they are left to fend for themselves.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In a larger sense, McCain&#039;s attempts to sell the notion that Senator Obama was wrong on Iraq and naive on foreign policy fly in the face of reality.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Obama was right to oppose the initiative in Iraq in 2002, when just about everyone, including McCain supported the idea. Obama was right in 2002 to warn against failing to complete the mission in Afghanistan, and in the last year, the consequences of our failure to follow that advice have elevated the risks to this country immeasurably, both in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We now face the very real risk that Pakistan&#039;s government could be taken over by Al Qaeda or a surrogate terrorist organization, and place us in the position of facing a terrorist state with nuclear weapons. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;As for Iraq, we desperately need to draw down our forces and reduce our expenditures in Iraq in order to reinforce Afghanistan and cope with serious threats to our economy. Notwithstanding that stark reality, McCain refuses to admit the strategic necessity of doing so.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Senator McCain keeps asserting that Senator Obama has not done one thing to oppose his own party on any issue.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In fact, Senator Obama introduced a bill in 2006, and then re-introduced an even stronger bill in 2007 which directly and specifically confronted the reckless practices which were at the heart of the sub-prime mortgage crisis. It never came to a vote. What did Senator Obama do about it? He ran for President, and wrested the leadership of the Democratic party from the Clintons. If that doesn&#039;t count as opposing the entrenched power structure of his party, what does? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The subtext of Senator McCain&#039;s obvious frustration at having to cope with &#039;that one&#039; (Senator Obama), is that anyone who takes the Obama candidacy seriously is naive, or stupid, or just plain foolish. As one who was a supporter of Senator McCain less than a year ago, I do feel foolish, just not anymore.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/tedthomas/gGg7HB</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/tedthomas/gGg7HB/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:33:48 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/tedthomas/gGg7HB</guid>
            <dc:creator>ted in pdx</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/8d70626b3ef7da9391_hxm6iip6t.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>ted in pdx</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGg7HB/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Bailout from &quot;Bottoms Up&quot; Stimulus Plan</title>
            <description>&amp;nbsp; &lt;p&gt;Sen. Obama:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like most Americans, I have much to lose too, however, I am willing to risk another week (heck, GOP shut down the government in the 90&amp;rsquo;s and we all survived) of potential loss while &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;you craft a plan that will:&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1&lt;/strong&gt;. Give&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;u&gt;no additional autonomy or authority to the Executive Branch,&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; that&amp;rsquo;s right, the Treasury Secretary can&#039;t make unilateral decisions.....PERIOD non-negotiable&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;u&gt;Regulate the Banking, Financial and Insurance industries &lt;/u&gt;so that each is separate and distinct from the other with uncomplicated accountability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;No &amp;quot;trickle down&amp;quot; solutions with regard to the insertion of the $700B into the economy. &lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4.&lt;/strong&gt; Every &lt;strong&gt;legal US citizen who filed a 2003-2007 income tax return and who is 21 years of age&lt;/strong&gt; or older as of July, 30th 2008 (rough estimate 200 million qualifiers) &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;receive a stimulus check.&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5.&lt;/strong&gt; The &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;&amp;quot;stimulus check&amp;quot; will be governed &lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;with the following provisions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a.&lt;/strong&gt; any outstanding mortgage the recipient has is satisfied.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;b.&lt;/strong&gt; 25% of any remaining stimulus money must be used by individual to buy Treasury Bonds, which are unredeemable for 1st&amp;nbsp;72 months. (yes, a 5 year comittment to our country)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;c.&lt;/strong&gt; 10% must be deposited in a local bank or credit union chosen at the discretion of the stimulus recipient.&amp;nbsp; 5yr CD or Passbook Account w/o interest for&amp;nbsp;initial 12 months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;d. &lt;/strong&gt;any remaining money from the stimulus (which should be very substantial)&amp;nbsp;may be use for satisfaction of any consumer debt, new tires for car, health insurance, investment, vacation, braces for the kids, college...all the kinds of things that we are struggling to afford.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Finally, the amount of the stimulus check to each of the roughly 200 million potential qualifiers shall be computed and distributed as follows:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1.&lt;/strong&gt; each qualified recipient receives an equal share of the proposed $700 Billion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2.&lt;/strong&gt; 22% Federal and 8% State &amp;quot;re-stimulus&amp;quot; withheld from each check to infuse each of the 50 capitals in the nation and the US Treasury too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Predicted/Desired Result:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1.&lt;/strong&gt; Public confidence in our government instantly restored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;. Banks remain operational.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3.&lt;/strong&gt; Restored confidence ameliorates any further irrational slippage in markets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4.&lt;/strong&gt; Mortgage notes paid off by home owners alleviates the mortgage insurance debt that has been passed around the financial community like a rotten fish wrapped in bacon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;5.&lt;/strong&gt; Financial predators&amp;rsquo; and scoundrels and robber barons accept the fundamentals of the risk they assumed as a result of the deregulation they desired and fought for; crafting ever more complex means of creating personal wealth; there will be winners and losers amongst these miscreants and that&amp;rsquo;s their row to hoe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Finally, &lt;/strong&gt;any remaining stimulus money held by the 200 million recipients of this package will, &amp;nbsp;you can be sure, be spent in a variety of ways and&amp;nbsp;to this end&amp;nbsp;we will have to pray and hope that Jefferson is correct (Tocqueville too) that Americans are smart, industrious and capable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your efforts and please know this; Sen. Reid and Speaker Pelosi are in receipt of this (my proposal) which is a way out and a way up and over for you and&amp;nbsp;our team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patriotically,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael J. Arendt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fresh Meadows NY&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/arendtmichael/gGxVMC</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/arendtmichael/gGxVMC/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:58:14 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/arendtmichael/gGxVMC</guid>
            <dc:creator>Michael from Fresh Meadows, NY</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Michael from Fresh Meadows, NY</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxVMC/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Picture Post: National Security Tour</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend, in a lead up to tonight&amp;rsquo;s first presidential debate, which will focus on foreign policy, Barack Obama&amp;rsquo;s Minnesota campaign held four town hall meetings across Minnesota to hear directly from Minnesotans about their views and answer questions on national security issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The campaign held town halls in Rochester, St. Paul, St. Cloud and Duluth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;U.S. Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA), chair of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, retired U.S. Army Major General Paul Eaton, who commanded the team charged with rebuilding the Iraqi army, and former Ambassador Bob Gelbard, President Clinton&#039;s Special Representative for the Balkans led the meetings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;U.S. Rep. Tim Walz and U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum also joined the campaign for portions of the tour.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here are some pictures from the St. Paul Town Hall, which was held at the History Center:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;500&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.slideflickr.com/slide/TLWc8nen&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.slideflickr.com/slide/TLWc8nen&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;500&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgsL9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgsL9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:49:47 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgsL9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Xavier Lopez-Ayala</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/28d1fd5297a55cd0d8_r4cymv7v0.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Xavier Lopez-Ayala</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgsL9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>To John McCain: We have 100% trouble; your&#039;s is a 10% solution</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;John McCain: Surely by now you recognize that America, and the world, is in deep trouble. &amp;nbsp;The stewardship of our economic security, our national security, of our environmental security, our direction as a nation and as a people has been so disastrous that even the Bush backers see it. &amp;nbsp;You have tried to recast yourself as a maverick after 8 years of casting yourself as a Bush backer and casting 90% of your Senatorial votes for George Bush&#039;s positions. &amp;nbsp;If I do the math, and seeing that George Bush has been wrong about almost everything (I&#039;ll leave that to be self evident), that leaves 10% of you that pushes for change, to make the wise choices. &amp;nbsp;That&#039;s a 10% solution to attack 100% trouble that is evident with just about every issue that might come up. &amp;nbsp;John McCain, I do believe you&#039;d be better than George Bush, at least 10% wise. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barack Obama: All that said, remember how George Bush went into auto-pilot as soon as he stepped into the Oval Office? &amp;nbsp;Remember how he didn&#039;t even examine the Clinton record and just ordered his people to do everything opposite, to abandon what was in progress, to undo the Clinton achievements? &amp;nbsp;On North Korea nukes (the result: N Korea now has nukes), on Palestine/Israel conflict (result: Hamas is now in power), on Iraq policy (result: an intractable war, a booming U.S. budget deficit, and an empowered Iran), &amp;nbsp;on protections against arsenic and air pollution (result: more allergies to airborne vectors, more asthma, more emphysema, more work time made unproductive, more cancers, more needless deaths), on control of global warming and fossil fuels combustion (result: more oil addiction, more reliance on adversaries, higher trade imbalance, more enrichment of al Qaeda and Hugo Chavez, a more aggressive Russia, higher gas prices, more and increasingly destructive storms and coastal erosion and flooding, more climatic upheaval and agricultural impacts), on logging our old growth national forests and reducing endangered species protection (less splendor, less natural treasure preserved), on social security (result: more insecurity, decreased well being of our seniors), on government balance of spending and income (result: ballooning budget deficit and reduced options for infrastructure improvements and other needs), on just about any issue you can name. On these issues there was pretty much no review of what was actually solid and positive about the Clinton record; there was just a knee-jerk action belying the Bush team&#039;s misunderstanding of the world&#039;s people, the economy, limits of military technology, and elementary physics. &amp;nbsp;So they just did opposite Clinton or undid what he did; that was their policy, until 9/11 came along, and then they could think of nothing else, they ignored all the other looming troubles, and they didn&#039;t even see that other actions undermined the steps they took to try to get al Qaeda, to fight nuclear proliferation, and to make the world safe for Capitalism. &amp;nbsp;We have some very serious undoing to do, but I urge that decisions to undo will be based on a serious level of review and a consideration of repercussive effects of changing course. &amp;nbsp;There are many things to do and push forward on, and those can be pursued right away, without delay, within the fiscally handicapped condition Bush is handing you. &amp;nbsp;In terms of the undoing, review is a good thing, if simply to establish the solid basis for undoing and to identify potential unintended consequences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gGgscl</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gGgscl/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:02:50 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gGgscl</guid>
            <dc:creator>Dr. Jeffrey Kargel</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Dr. Jeffrey Kargel</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgscl/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Blue Star Families for Obama Live Blog</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Join us on Friday, September 26, 2008, during the first presidential debate for the debut of Blue Star Families for Obama live blogging!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Blue Star Families for Obama leadership members will be on hand to share their perspective during the debate and military family members and veterans are welcome to stop by and share their thoughts as well.&amp;nbsp; The focus of the first debate is national security, so we&#039;d love to hear from all of you. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To join in, simply go to our new website: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bsf4o.com&quot;&gt;Blue Star Families for Obama&lt;/a&gt; and click on Blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ll be live blogging from 8pm EST until the debate ends and our conversation winds down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We hop you&#039;ll join us! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/gs77r5&quot;&gt;Invitation and details&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJV</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJV/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:16:14 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJV</guid>
            <dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Steph</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgsJV/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Blue Star Families for Obama Live Blog</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Join us on Friday, September 26, 2008, during the first presidential debate for the debut of Blue Star Families for Obama live blogging!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Blue Star Families for Obama leadership members will be on hand to share their perspective during the debate and military family members and veterans are welcome to stop by and share their thoughts as well.&amp;nbsp; The focus of the first debate is national security, so we&#039;d love to hear from all of you. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To join in, simply go to our new website: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bsf4o.com&quot;&gt;Blue Star Families for Obama&lt;/a&gt; and click on Blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ll be live blogging from 8pm EST until the debate ends and our conversation winds down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We hop you&#039;ll join us! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/gs77r5&quot;&gt;Invitation and details&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJF</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJF/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:16:14 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gGgsJF</guid>
            <dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Steph</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgsJF/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>KAAL on Obama Campaign Town Hall Meeting</title>
            <description>&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mn.barackobama.com/mnsecuritytour&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/-/Minnesota/MN_security_tour_nobtn.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;85%&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;KAAL &lt;a href=&quot;http://kaaltv.com/article/stories/S588543.shtml?cat=10219&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; on yesterday&#039;s National Security Town Hall in Rochester:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;(ABC 6 News) - Polls are showing a tight margin between Barack Obama and John McCain. As we get closer to Election Day we can expect to see more local politicians rallying for their presidential candidate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the first town hall meeting for Senator Barack Obama in Rochester, national security experts took the stage stumping for the democratic hopeful.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;They unveiled Obama&#039;s foreign policy vision for national security.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;It includes withdrawing troops from Iraq within 16 months and refocusing the fight towards Al Qaeda and the Taliban.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Focus on the people who actually perpetrated 9-11 on us that&#039;s taking this to Afghanistan and making sure Pakistan is brought into this,&amp;quot; Tim Walz.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;Republicans in our area stumping for John McCain were quick to respond to the proposal. In a phone interview Minnesota Republican Chair Ron Carey criticizes Obama&#039;s plan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;On Iraq, Barack Obama says he wants peace, but if he continues to oppose the strategy that has lead to a tremendous reduction of violence, his calls for unconditional withdrawal could result in a renewed violence,&amp;quot; said Carey.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democratic Congressman Tim Walz disagrees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The currently policy under President Bush supported by Senator McCain has been solely focused on Iraq, that had nothing to do with 9-11, and had used our resources, our troops to the point where it&#039;s very difficult to focus on the greater need,&amp;quot; said Walz.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;     &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kaaltv.com/article/stories/S588543.shtml?cat=10219&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Click here to watch KAAL&#039;s video from the Town Hall.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgyJy</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgyJy/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:23:13 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/xavierlopezayala/gGgyJy</guid>
            <dc:creator>Xavier Lopez-Ayala</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/28d1fd5297a55cd0d8_r4cymv7v0.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Xavier Lopez-Ayala</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgyJy/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Resources for Debating</title>
            <description>Courtesy of Daily Kos, here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/16/9641/62473/762/599278&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;handy catalog of debating points&quot;&gt;handy catalog of debating points&lt;/a&gt; for use in trying to convince people to vote for Obama.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGgmHs</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGgmHs/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:37:31 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ideaworks/gGgmHs</guid>
            <dc:creator>signsSansSignifieds</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/3244b5158a688ee0f9_81kgmvi5t.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>signsSansSignifieds</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgmHs/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Gulf Crisis</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;With no disrespect meant to the millions of people in Texas, Louisianna,Florida and Mississippi over the past couple of weeks by Hurricanes, there is no way I can pass this up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following is a conversation that may be happening between Big Oil and Big Bad John right now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big John:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Drill, baby drill and drill now!&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; China hi-jacked our Iraqi oil.&amp;nbsp; We have absolutely nothing to show for our invasion of Iraq.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oil Exec:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Drill?&amp;nbsp; We can&#039;t even pump this hurricane&#039;s so bad.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big John:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;You got to do something.&amp;nbsp; Tell the Governor&amp;nbsp;to call up the Guard, the seebees to do something.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oil Exec:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;We can&#039;t sir, most of the Guard is deployed in Iraq and what&#039;s left has been ordered to search and rescue hurricane victims.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, CNN reports that in Florida oil prices all of a sudden jumped 50 cent while people waited in line to fill up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the time they get this oil mess&amp;nbsp;stablized in seven years we should already be 85% of the way to energy independence and free&amp;nbsp;from the yoke oil and fewer national security issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the meantime, let us all pray for the victims of our latest national emergency.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/michaeldtpatterson/gG5QRL</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/michaeldtpatterson/gG5QRL/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:25:38 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/michaeldtpatterson/gG5QRL</guid>
            <dc:creator>Michael P.</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/714577f8b513226db0_qum6b56in.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Michael P.</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5QRL/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Charlie Gibson Let Governor Palin Off the Hook</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Thursday night segment of his interview of Governor Palin, Charlie Gibson asked her whether she supported the Bush Doctrine. It was immediately clear that she had no idea what the Bush Doctrine is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some commentators have called this a &amp;quot;gotcha question&amp;quot;, as if it were somehow unfair to expect a candidate for Vice President to understand the key doctrinal change to US national security policy made by the sitting President.&amp;nbsp; One ABC commentator this morning even went so far as to say that you could ask the same question of 500 staffers at the White House, State Department and Pentagon and none of them would know the answer -- which is utterly preposterous, or extremely disturbing... take your pick. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gibson proceeded to lead Governor Palin on with the clue that the doctrine was &amp;quot;enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; With this information, she managed to bluff out a generic non-answer answer, ending with &amp;quot;with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better&amp;quot;, never touching on anything remotely related to the Bush Doctrine.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is where Gibson let her off the hook.&amp;nbsp; At this point, he decided to tell Governor Palin what the Bush Doctrine is, but he left off the crucial point that really differentiates it from past foreign policy. He said, &amp;quot;the Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Leaving off the one crucial point allowed Palin the opportunity to give another non-answer answer, this time emphasizing how John McCain&#039;s &amp;quot;top priority is to defend the American people.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What Gibson should have done was not tell her about the Bush Doctrine, but simply ask &amp;quot;Do you believe that the United States has the right to attack another country in pre-emptive self-defense, &lt;em&gt;even when the threat is not immediate&lt;/em&gt;?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; If she answered yes, that would have proven that she&#039;s more of the same.&amp;nbsp; If she answered no, then he could have said &amp;quot;So, then you disagree with the Bush Doctrine which was the national security policy basis that he gave for justifying the Iraq war.&amp;nbsp; Do you believe that the United States was wrong to invade Iraq in 2003?&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; would have been a &amp;quot;gotcha question&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-rhs &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rhs/gG5Qpc</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rhs/gG5Qpc/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:22:02 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rhs/gG5Qpc</guid>
            <dc:creator>Richard H. Schwartz</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/e722fdcefcafb6ad3f_vvnmv2r4f.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Richard H. Schwartz</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Qpc/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Task From God - Perfectly Clear to Gibson and Thinking People</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Prof. Brian Kalt, a Michigan Law Professor wrote a piece for the National Post, a Canadian online publication, about Part 1 of the interview of Gov. Palin that Charles Gibson of ABC News conducted. You can read it by &lt;a href=&quot;http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/09/11/brian-kalt-sarah-palin-interviewed-by-charlie-gibson-journalism-at-its-worst.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Prof Kalt&#039;s Take on Palin-Gibson Interview&quot;&gt;clicking here&lt;/a&gt;. And you can view the interview by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ALsjhDDdaA&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Gibson-Palin Interview&quot;&gt;clicking here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I rebutted his argument in the following letter, which I emailed to him. Please ignore the typo in last sentence of the 2nd paragraph.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The right will do anything to win this election. I for one am pleased that Mr. Gibson asked some tough questions and didn&#039;t let up. It&#039;s the first time I have seen anyone really push this person who could easily be president. She was not properly vetted by the McCain team and it shows. Now it&#039;s up to the media with access to her to do so for the sake of our country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read on what Prof. Kalt wrote:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Dear Mr. Kalt,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You wrote a piece on the National Post that states that Gibson willfully misrepresented Gov. Palin comments made at the church in Wasilla about the war being a task from God. Nothing could be further from the truth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gov. Palin&amp;rsquo;s words (transcribed below) are totally clear to anyone who is concerned about her views and how they would impact the separation of church and state. There is no ambiguity whatsoever about &amp;ldquo;&lt;strong&gt;our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;rdquo; She then goes on to state that they need to pray that the plan is God&amp;rsquo;s plan. She closes this segment by asking the the people to whom she is speaking to bless the soldiers with prayer of protection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since it&amp;rsquo;s clear that the task is from God, the only conclusions about the plan that can be reached from her words are: (1) it relates to the task, (2) that it exists, and (3) it is according to God. Therefore your interpretation and subsequent analogy (copied below) are incorrect and misleading given what she actually said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is clearly one of the most important elections in recent memory given the enormity of the economic, social and foreign relation problems we face. It is unconscionable that someone of your ability and position would twist the words of an unknown governor who might have to become president with no notice. Since it&amp;rsquo;s obvious to everyone that Gov. Palin was not properly vetted by Sen. McCain, it is up to those people who are able to interview her to provide us with some degree of assurance that she could lead the country if necessary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While you may be convinced that Sarah Palin is a good choice for vice president, there are millions who are not. The divide in this country will not go away by glossing over her beliefs, her strengths and weaknesses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brian Kalt&amp;rsquo;s Words:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In other words, Palin asked the crowd at her church to pray that the soldiers&#039; task is aligned with God&#039;s plan. She didn&#039;t say that it was part of God&#039;s plan. It would be like if I said &amp;quot;I sure do hope that the Red Wings will win the Stanley Cup again this year,&amp;quot; and Charlie interviews me and says &amp;quot;You said, and I quote, &#039;the Red Wings will win the Stanley Cup this year.&#039; What makes you so brashly confident?&amp;quot; (If Charlie asked me a question like that, my face would turn red and I&#039;d say something regrettable, which is why I&#039;ll never be elected to anything.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would have liked it if Palin&#039;s response had pointed this out, clearly and directly. She did make the point, but in a roundabout way that was probably lost on anyone who wasn&#039;t either knowledgeable about her speech or already inclined to favor her.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sarah Palin&amp;rsquo;s Words&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;&amp;hellip;my son Track, he&amp;rsquo;s a soldier in the United States Army now. He&amp;rsquo;s an infantryman, and umm, and so Track sends his love also to his former nanny Christie.&amp;nbsp; And Track, pray for our military. He&amp;rsquo;s going to be deployed in September to Iraq, pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right also for this country that our leaders, our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God. That&amp;rsquo;s what we have to make sure that we are praying for, that there is a plan and that, that plan is, is God&amp;rsquo;s plan. So, uh, bless them with your prayers, your prayers of protection over our soldiers&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;John DesMarteau, MD&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johndesmarteau/gG53nY</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johndesmarteau/gG53nY/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:07:14 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johndesmarteau/gG53nY</guid>
            <dc:creator>John DesMarteau, MD</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/1d59069cc30f47ea16_5sm6ib83q.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>John DesMarteau, MD</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG53nY/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The Campaign Produces Literature for Vets</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Many veterans, both active citizens and those involved with the campaign and working at a grass-roots level, asked for easy-to-read sheets explaining Senator Obama&#039;s distinguished record on veterans issues.&amp;nbsp; We are pleased to announce their completion, posted right here for your download and use on the campaign trail.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/-/Amanda/BO_Vets_1pg.pdf&quot;&gt;Barack Obama on Veterans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/-/Amanda/BO_MilitaryFams_1pg.pdf&quot;&gt;Barack Obama on Military Families&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/-/Amanda/BO_VetIssue_Compare_3.pdf&quot;&gt;Veterans Issues: Comparing Senator Obama and Senator McCain &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/christopherhenderson/gG5LX9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/christopherhenderson/gG5LX9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:12:40 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/christopherhenderson/gG5LX9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Veterans for Obama</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/7cb068d348a0660c5f_awm6bxzyp.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Veterans for Obama</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5LX9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Registering Voters in Rutherford County, TN</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Cross-posted at Daily Kos: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Conventional wisdom holds that Tennessee is going to stay red and vote in the McCain/Palin ticket, and handily re-elect Lamar Alexander to the U.S. Senate.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I beg to differ.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;First off, those in the know recognize how poor McCain and Alexander are in terms of their Senate votes on the issues that are most important to everyday Americans.&amp;nbsp; They&amp;rsquo;re opposed to breaking free from the Petro-energy conglomerates, big contributors to the Republican party and their own campaign war chests for years. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The oil gluttonous corporations keep getting corporate welfare and tax cuts while Americans lose jobs and are forced to take on second jobs to earn gas money to get to their primary jobs.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Obama/Biden and Bob Tuke plan to move America ahead by heralding in a Green Economy and taking the lead to herald in a new Technology revolution akin to the PC tech boom that restored the middle class in the 1990&amp;rsquo;s under Bill Clinton. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Healthcare?&amp;nbsp; Forget it! &amp;nbsp;McCain and Lamar Alexander are backed by big pharma and insurance companies, and want to make sure Americans remain at the mercy of their insurance companies when it comes to their healthcare needs.&amp;nbsp; Obama and Bob Tuke know we need to set a new course in America, which is at the lowest rung of the developed nations in providing healthcare for its citizens.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Tennesseans are not stupid and we in Rutherford County are tapping into this &amp;ldquo;awakening&amp;rdquo; and registering voters by the droves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;We&amp;rsquo;ve been going door-to-door in the fastest growing neighborhoods and communities around (and Rutherford County leads the state in terms of rapid growth), signing up new residents, those who haven&amp;rsquo;t voted in years, and those who, like the gentleman I signed up a week ago, were born in 1944, and never, ever voted in their lives!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;We&amp;rsquo;ve formed teams to cover the county.&amp;nbsp; Lee, a retired schoolteacher who worries over former students who are more and more serving in the military, returning home from Iraq or Afghanistan maimed or in flag-draped coffins.&amp;nbsp; Cecilia, a brilliant woman with a criminology degree who&amp;rsquo;s been beaten down by health problems and the rising cost of medications, battles her own aches and pains to trudge alongside Lee in North Rutherford County.&amp;nbsp; Together, the two of them are supplemented by a group of volunteers who vary from the disaffected lifelong Republican woman CPA to the state employee and her two teenage sons, too young to vote this cycle, but preparing already to vote in the Obama/Biden and Bob Tuke re-elections in a few years time. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The South County team is headed by a band of energized individuals, including Dana, who hails from California originally and worries our earth may not be around long enough for her (future) grandchildren to enjoy, and Hans, a thirty-something gentleman married to a professor at the local university who accepted the time-consuming task of identifying all of the apartment complexes in a designated region and mapped out the county so we could visualize our nightly routes.&amp;nbsp; Then there is Jill.&amp;nbsp; Like Sarah Palin, she&amp;rsquo;s a mother of five, but her marriage to a career soldier who earned a purple heart (among other medals), she traveled around the world and lived on military bases all over the place and could blow the Pit-bull with lipstick out of the water in terms of foreign policy understanding and experience. And there&#039;s Richard, an injured veteran who served in Vietnam.&amp;nbsp; Richard&#039;s no fool and recognizes how poor McCain would be as commander in chief (not to mention the erstwhile hockey mom should something happen to McCain).&amp;nbsp; Wearing back support, Richard hobbles along with the rest of the group, knocking on doors when he is up to it, and remaining behind to head up the command center when he needs a break.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Yes we can is the motto of the Obama campaign, and in Rutherford County, we absolutely embrace that motto.&amp;nbsp; We all dig deep and volunteer whatever time, resources, and capabilities we can to ensure that Barack Obama is elected President, that we can call Joe Biden our Vice President, and that we can happily celebrate the election of Bob Tuke to the U.S. Senate. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Yes we can, Rutherford County! &amp;nbsp;Yes we can, Tennessee! &amp;nbsp;Ye we can United States of America! &amp;nbsp;YES.WE.CAN!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5Lyf</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5Lyf/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:31:38 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5Lyf</guid>
            <dc:creator>Maura Satchell</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/385c1bb7fe712e7fd6_qim6bknwr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Maura Satchell</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Lyf/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Republicans Will Agree With This</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone who is interested in national security, even the professionals at the White House, have agreed that our dependence on foreign oil is a problem. Truly, no other issue can matter more to Republicans who want to vote for a leader than national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/josephdowdy/gG52HY</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/josephdowdy/gG52HY/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:18:59 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/josephdowdy/gG52HY</guid>
            <dc:creator>Marine Veteran for Obama</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/0242cafae0f9836985_bjm6b6u9p.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Marine Veteran for Obama</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG52HY/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>My first blog post</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;This is my first blog post. Today is September 7th, 2008, just 58 days away from the election day. The state of the race as I see it is one where we are currently in Palin surge phase. The media has made Palin a celebrity based on her two speeches after her surprise selection by McCain. McCain campaign probably realised that they were suffering from an enthusiasm gap and Obama&#039;s electric acceptance speech in front of 84,000 strong crowd forced them to hastily select an unknown former beauty queen, moose hunting, mother of five &amp;amp; 1st term Governer of Alaska in order to divert the media&#039;s attention away from the Obama speech. It is questionable whether the McCain campaign did enough vetting before they decided to go with Palin. It is clear that the McCain campaign wants to make this election a referendum on the social issues such as abortion, gun control, gay marriage etc. &amp;amp; Palin helps them to lock up the conservative base of the Republicans because of her stance on those issues &amp;amp; also appeal to some disgruntled Hillary supporters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Palin &amp;amp; her family faced intense media scrutiny just days after her selection which resulted in the revelation of a lot of stuff about her past many of which are questionable as of today and it lowered the expectations from her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech. After her speech, in which she spewed a lot of vitriol towards Obama, the media declared it a success &amp;amp; conferred the &#039;star is born&#039; status to her which the McCain campaign wisely used to grow their momentum out of convention. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, the McCain campaign is no doubt feeling a lot better about their candidates prospects. The Obama campaign&#039;s first headache is how to deal with Palin. As of now,&amp;nbsp; Palin is getting positive media coverage largely due to her convention speech. But she has not given a single interview to a tough journalist. She has no foreign policy &amp;amp; national security experience. She has no knowledge of&amp;nbsp; the current world problems and McCain&#039;s age becomes an issue since inexperienced Palin is just a heartbeat away from Presidency. Also, she has never done &#039;Meet The Press&#039; in which she can have the chance to explain her record &amp;amp; her questionable actions in the past.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Palin&#039;s favorability is currently just over 50%. But I expect that over the course of next 2 months a lot of her weaknesses will be exposed which will drive up her negatives as she talks about the issues that currently worry the electorate. The Biden - Palin debate will be an interesting one as Biden is a foreign policy &amp;amp; national security behemoth while Palin is a woman who probably won&#039;t be able to find Iraq &amp;amp; Pakistan on the world map. Obviously, the right wing scumbags will be teaching her tricks to bait Biden to make a sexist or a condescending remark in the debate. Biden cannot take the debate lightly. He has to prepare &amp;amp; perform diligently.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mjblog/gG5Wfc</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mjblog/gG5Wfc/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:51:07 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mjblog/gG5Wfc</guid>
            <dc:creator>mj from puerto rico</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>mj from puerto rico</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Wfc/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Biden Says He Won&#039;t Attack Palin, Only Policies</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://momocrats.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/04/me_biden.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/images/2008/09/04/me_biden.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Me_biden&quot; title=&quot;Me_biden&quot; width=&quot;250&quot; height=&quot;193&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This morning I attended a national security roundtable event with Senator Joe Biden, Democratic nominee for Vice President.&amp;nbsp; Biden is widely regarded as an expert in national security and military issues, so this is a natural fit for him, particularly in the military community here in the Virginia Beach area.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;My friend, &lt;a href=&quot;http://hamptonroads.com/blogs/liberal-life-navy-wife&quot;&gt;blogger&lt;/a&gt;, fellow &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/group/BlueStarsForObama&quot;&gt;Blue Star Families for Obama&lt;/a&gt; leadership team member, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/2008/07/guest-post-vivi.html&quot;&gt;honorary&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/2008/08/guest-post-vivi.html&quot;&gt;MOMocrat&lt;/a&gt;, Vivian, was on the panel with Senator Biden.&amp;nbsp; While we all expected a major emphasis on the military, Iraq, and other national security issues, Biden surprised us all by taking off-topic questions from the audience.&amp;nbsp; He covered everything from the economy to the military &amp;quot;don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell policy.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; This is the first in a series of posts covering Biden&#039;s responses to the issues raised during the roundtable. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Fortunately, I had my cell phone with me and was able to capture some of Biden&#039;s responses on video.&amp;nbsp; The quality is bad &amp;amp; you&#039;ll need to turn the volume up to hear him, but it&#039;s worth it.&amp;nbsp; (Although watch out for the clapping at the beginning.&amp;nbsp; It&#039;s quite loud.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gG5rg9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gG5rg9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:23:03 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephaniehimelnelson/gG5rg9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Steph</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5rg9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Real Change and the McCain ruse</title>
            <description>&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I support Senator Obama because of his sound judgment, education, experience and his absolute embodiment of change. But more importantly, I believe that his election will mean more security for the US - without a single expense to US tax payers. The goodwill that his nomination has generated&amp;nbsp;around the&amp;nbsp;world directly translates into more allies, stronger relationships and, ultimately, less external military expenditure. Such a reduction in expenditure not only frees more money to tackle problems at home but also represents a real &#039;tax cut,&#039; for US citizens and a better future for our children who will be burdened with less debt. I have been traveling abroad for several years on business and never have I witnessed such euphoria for the US and its ideals by foreigners of all stripes and origin. Barack Obama represents an immediate &#039;peace dividend&#039; for the US. He must be elected the next president of this great nation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Until now, I have supported the Obama campaign in private &amp;ndash; I have created a campaign support group with over 4000 members &amp;ndash; but I register officially today because I am insulted be the inexperience and duplicity of McCain&amp;rsquo;s pick for Vice President, Sarah Palin. After denigrating Obama&amp;rsquo;s credentials for president, McCain decides to select a one-year governor of a state of less than 1 million inhabitants. &amp;nbsp;We will not allow this ruse to prevail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/erictande/gG5tTb</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/erictande/gG5tTb/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:11:20 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/erictande/gG5tTb</guid>
            <dc:creator>Eric Tande</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/2edb9287b5799564c9_j2m6b18fv.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Eric Tande</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5tTb/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Denver, but not at Invesco</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Despite all my efforts, I didn&#039;t make it to Invesco Field for the truly historic event Thursday night.&amp;nbsp; I&#039;d been in Denver all week, not as a delegate but as member of the DNC&#039;s Veterans and Military Families Council which I addressed briefly Tuesday afternoon, telling of my son&#039;s &amp;quot;homecoming&amp;quot; from war, shortchanged by a military budget cut that left room for no-bid contract payouts, but not for welcome home receptions for our troops. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I hung out with veterans all week at Coors Stadium, thanks to sponsorship by ALPA (Airline Pilots Association), VETPAC, and other organizations that played host to the constituents that ensure free speech, security for our nation, and ultimately, support of the tenets of our Constitution. &amp;nbsp; On Thursday afternoon, I was about to take possession of tickets for myself and a fellow military mom to be at Invesco Field when a military spouse whose husband is deployed to Iraq as a Helicopter Pilot inserted herself into the negotiation.&amp;nbsp; I couldn&amp;rsquo;t refuse her plea and we hung out at Coors Field, watching the speech on the Jumbotron, kicking ourselves for missing it. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The overarching theme of the week&#039;s events within our venue was &amp;quot;Team Obama/Biden&amp;quot; are a slam dunk in terms of National Security, Foreign Policy, Military Affairs and Veterans Affairs. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I heard tell that in his four years in the Senate, Barack Obama, who serves on the Veterans Affairs Committee,&amp;nbsp; as well as the Foreign Relations Committee, has introduced or co-sponsored more legislation in support of veterans than Sen. McCain has in his entire career in the Senate.&amp;nbsp; Inexplicable, when you consider McCain is a vet.&amp;nbsp; When I get my act in better gear, I&#039;ll post links to the legislation.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;See more about some of the high-name folks that support Obama/Biden below.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5D5X</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5D5X/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:13:49 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/maurasatchell/gG5D5X</guid>
            <dc:creator>Maura Satchell</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/385c1bb7fe712e7fd6_qim6bknwr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Maura Satchell</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5D5X/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Foreign Policy Panel: Obama and National Security Issues</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images-partners-tbn.google.com/images?q=tbn:aDNxWYEbiS4QXM:www.globaldevelopmentmatters.org/UserFiles/Image/center_logo.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;The Center for U.S. Global ...&quot; width=&quot;95&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images-partners-tbn.google.com/images?q=tbn:as2u0ttkYcd_vM:www.cityu.edu.hk/garc/images/seminar/NDI_logo.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;... National Democratic Institute ...&quot; width=&quot;123&quot; height=&quot;86&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Center for U.S. Global Engagement and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs&amp;nbsp;held a panel discussion during the Democratic National Convention entitled, &amp;quot;Foreign Policy and National Security in an Obama Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The panel discussion was&amp;nbsp;originally aired by&amp;nbsp; C-SPAN&amp;nbsp;on 08/28/08. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The panel discussion emphasized the importance of laying foundations for relationships with the people of other nations and supporting development with a focus on needs identified from within those nations.&amp;nbsp; There was also discussion of redirecting support from a militaristic&amp;nbsp;approach to one of development.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I have confidence in Senator Obama&#039;s judgment and I&#039;m impressed with Dr. Susan Rice,&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; members of the panel expressed views towards Iran that I found unacceptable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, why is&amp;nbsp;Iran is so frequently portrayed as&amp;nbsp;more of a threat to the&amp;nbsp;world than any other country with nuclear weapons?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why didn&#039;t the panel&amp;nbsp;call&amp;nbsp;for aggressive diplomacy and tough sanctions against Israel, India, and Pakistan for their already-existing nuclear arsenals, especially since these three countries--no less than Iran--are also in violation of UN Security Council resolutions regarding their nuclear programs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What&amp;nbsp;gives&amp;nbsp;the United States the right to decide which countries are &amp;quot;allowed&amp;quot; to have nuclear&amp;nbsp;weapons and which countries are not?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;There should be no country with&amp;nbsp;nuclear weapons --including the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images-partners-tbn.google.com/images?q=tbn:TkNlQudhA27ODM:farm3.static.flickr.com/2396/2344956823_f8c2ee1a52.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;... the emerging national security ...&quot; width=&quot;127&quot; height=&quot;85&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following quote from Senator Obama on &amp;quot;investing in our common humanity&amp;quot; is key in improving international relations, increasing global security, and restoring our devastated domestic economy:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;I will strengthen our common security by investing in our common humanity.&amp;nbsp; Our global engagement cannot be defined by what we are against; it must be guided by a clear sense of what we stand for.&amp;nbsp; We have a significant stake in ensuring that those who live in fear and want today can live in dignity and opportunity tomorrow. -- Senator Barack Obama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Below is an overview, from &lt;em&gt;Roll Call,&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; of&amp;nbsp;the discussion&amp;nbsp;on National Security Issues in an Obama Administration by the&amp;nbsp;Panel of Foreign Policy Advisers:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A panel of foreign policy advisers close to Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) shed light on how an Obama presidency might deal with national security issues. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The group, which included former Cabinet officials, Members of the Congress and representatives from various countries, such as Britain and Afghanistan, spoke at a roundtable discussion Thursday in Denver. The panelists touched on a variety of issues, including the threats of terrorism, climate change and nuclear proliferation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/No%20More%20Fear/gG5f55</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/No%20More%20Fear/gG5f55/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:21:29 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/No%20More%20Fear/gG5f55</guid>
            <dc:creator>Hope4Unity</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/0f151ed008598227b5_52m6b99pi.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Hope4Unity</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5f55/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Energy Policy, Timely Action, and our Core Values are Pivotal to America’s Future</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Every period of history has written its own future; that&amp;rsquo;s the nature of the Universe.&amp;nbsp; One moment conditions and strides into the next.&amp;nbsp; That&amp;rsquo;s obvious.&amp;nbsp; However, there are relatively stable times when likely future paths are more predictable or more controllable and less prone to deleterious derailments than other times.&amp;nbsp; This is not one of those stable times.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;rsquo;s not stable economically, politically, or environmentally.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;There are times so precarious, due partly to careless human management of affairs on our planet and partly just because of physics and geology, that decisions or events pushed one way would create a totally different future than decisions or events pushed another way.&amp;nbsp; Precarious times make fertile grounds for revolutions.&amp;nbsp; Think about the time of the World War II years and the development of the Cold War.&amp;nbsp; Or the American Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution.&amp;nbsp; The question during such revolutionary times is always which way to go?&amp;nbsp; Whose revolution will it be?&amp;nbsp; Whose strength will become dominant and whose world order will prevail over the others?&amp;nbsp; Whose ideals will become embedded in society and institutions of the future?&amp;nbsp; And now we ask, whoever comes to dominate the new order, will logic and respect prevail, or will one disaster presage the next in a cascading sequence of traumas delivered to everybody and everything on the globe? &amp;nbsp;Or will this century be much less about domination and much more about sound persuasion and allowance for being different?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Will China replace America as the pre-eminent economic and military power, and if so, what path will they take in their superpower management of our planet, including the global environment and America&amp;rsquo;s and the democratic free world&amp;rsquo;s economies and political institution?&amp;nbsp; Will Russia&amp;rsquo;s relations with the West take a turn back to the Cold War?&amp;nbsp; Will neglect of real issues in the Islamic World press them to take increasingly militant stances, including support for al Qaeda, and will our continuing response render democracy and freedom something of the past?&amp;nbsp; Will increasing American dependence on foreign petroleum spur opposition to America and the democratic free world by China, Russia, and al Qaeda all in the same generation?&amp;nbsp; Surely we cannot struggle against all three at once.&amp;nbsp; Fortunately, the possibility exists that we might need not struggle&amp;nbsp; against any one of them, if we and they are wise.&amp;nbsp; If I wax too optimistic about this, at least we can avoid a global free-for-all.&amp;nbsp; We can avoid it, but will we?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Will we destroy ourselves and all the ideals America has grown to represent by trying vainly to tackle foreign adversaries in short-sighted and ineffective ways? Will uncontrolled fear drive America and the democratic free world to embrace step-wise lowering of our standards of freedom and technological encroachments on our privacy, such that eventually individuals and unsanctioned groups have no standing with increasingly totalitarian-minded governments?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Will we do to ourselves what no totalitarian ideology has been able to achieve? &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The threats are not only about human relations.&amp;nbsp; Will growth in global burning of fossil fuels bring on climatic shifts so profound that the major economies and powers of the world collapse under the burdens and damages wrought by this generation&amp;rsquo;s decisions? Will climate change or depletion of nonrenewable resources be foremost in wringing failure from civilization&amp;rsquo;s technological success?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The decisions and paths taken over the next few years will substantially determine our American path and the global future.&amp;nbsp; These times are as serious and globally consequential as any time in history, for better or worse.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I ask some serious questions, as though there may be a dire fate we are thrusting ourselves into.&amp;nbsp; However, I am optimistic that America will reassert itself as a positive force in the world; reassert its insistence that all men and women are created equal and embody the individual and collective pursuit of happiness; reassert itself through the power of knowledge, logic, and compassion as well as through steadfast opposition to ideologies&amp;mdash;foreign-born and domestic-- that would overturn a millennium of human progress in well being and civic freedom.&amp;nbsp; I am optimistic that if we try to be better as a people, work even harder than ever, keep and reinforce our core values when devaluation threatens, then we will be as successful as geology and physics and logic can make us. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I believe--not in some blind-follows-the-blind way, but in a &amp;quot;trust but verify&amp;quot; type of way-- that Barack Obama has the ideas, &amp;nbsp;the advisors, the good sense, and the boldness that will be needed to take us where we must go. &amp;nbsp;I am optimistic about America and about our world.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gG59GB</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gG59GB/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:13:18 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jeffkargel/gG59GB</guid>
            <dc:creator>Dr. Jeffrey Kargel</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Dr. Jeffrey Kargel</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG59GB/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Push through the Barriers</title>
            <description>&amp;nbsp;According to Barack Obama&amp;nbsp; believes that its time for the war in Iraq to stop.Its time to make the American peoples National Security be safer.Its time to let the Iraqi people take responsibility for their own.&lt;strong&gt;WAKE UP ALL YOUTHS AND SMELL THE COFFEE&lt;/strong&gt;(Sorry for the cliche).Its time that we put some one into presidency.Someone who wont send our boys/men,girls/women to their ends.Someone who aims to help us be heard and to make a difference.McCain doesnt want to stop the war.Infact he is ready to spend more money to encourage his war that seems to have no end or have no real meaning.Our voting is what decides the future.The money being spent on the war is incredibly ridculous.This same money can be spent on the American people.To use to encourage bigger opportunities for the American youths,to use to help our women,our teens and children. This money would help to develop an opportunity for better eductaion and would also&amp;nbsp;make a fundamental impact on the lives of many Black Americans or on all&amp;nbsp;people of colour&amp;nbsp; and of other racial background.This encourages them to see a rolemodel in Barack Obama and see that they too are able to &lt;strong&gt;PUSH THROUGH THE BARRIERS OF BEING RACIALLY STEREOTYPED&lt;/strong&gt;.By&amp;nbsp; making them know and see that they too can make it and that they can be something even though society still under-estimates them.This is the opportunity all Youths need.An opportunity for change.An opportunity for refinement and balance.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/youths/gG5bzR</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/youths/gG5bzR/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:16:07 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/youths/gG5bzR</guid>
            <dc:creator>Unknown user</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Unknown user</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5bzR/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>This is how it starts....</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who knows the history of Hitler and how he built the Third Reich or of the U.S.S.R. and how Russia built the Soviet Union, piece by piece, knows where Russia&#039;s attack on Georgia is going.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But this time, It will be different.&amp;nbsp; Putin has learned from the former U.S.S.R.&#039;s mistakes.&amp;nbsp; He also does not trust China, because China, although Communist, is a threat to Russia both territorially, economically and militarily.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, what is a poor leader of Russia to do when trying to reconstitute the Soviet empire?&amp;nbsp; He looks south to Iran and the &amp;quot;oil belt.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/lauraschneider/gG5KDJ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/lauraschneider/gG5KDJ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:11:17 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/lauraschneider/gG5KDJ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Laura Schneider</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/c00dacb5b44fbb71ee_gym6beapr.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Laura Schneider</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5KDJ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>My Top Ten Reasons Why Barack  Obama is the Best Choice for International Relations and U.S. National Security</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In recent weeks, the McCain campaign has repeatedly argued that Barack Obama is unprepared to engage in international relations as President.&amp;nbsp; These are my top ten reasons why I strongly believe that Obama as President would be highly successful in dealing with foreign policy and national security issues, much more so than John McCain.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;1. There&#039;s no doubt that Sen. Barack Obama has more global appeal than any other candidate for President. He&#039;s the son of an African immigrant and a woman from Kansas, which represents an obvious departure from the past. &amp;nbsp;HIs global popularity is undeniable and would give him additional leverage in encouraging other nations to embrace particular approaches to foreign policy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;2. Obama has lived in other countries and traveled abroad extensively, and as a result fully understands many other cultures particularly in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Obama studied international relations in college and consequently understands important nuances of foreign policy. He has brought his academic expertise to the U.S. Foreign Relations committee and has worked in a bipartisan fashion to chart a new American foreign policy. For example, Obama spearheaded the effort &amp;ndash; along with Republican Senator Richard Luger - to emphasize the importance of helping eliminate &amp;ldquo;loose nukes&amp;rdquo; in Russia and Eastern Europe &amp;ndash; a project that had been vastly under-funded by the Bush Administration. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. He witnessed poverty and related social problems firsthand on a daily basis as a community organizer on the streets of Chicago and will have a greater understanding of comparable Third World issues as a result. His experience at the grassroots level in the U.S. will enable him to devise viable, innovative solutions to global problems as poverty, hunger, lack of adequate health care, worker safety, infant mortality, AIDS, organized crime, and human trafficking. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. He has incredible credibility (and political capital) in the world because he opposed the Iraq War from the very beginning (unlike John McCain) and understood in 2002 that Bush&#039;s pre-emptive war in Iraq would seriously hurt America&#039;s standing in the world. After all, the Iraq War is the Number One reason why the U.S. has become so incredibly unpopular in recent years. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Obama has clearly demonstrated good judgment in such foreign policy decisions, unlike McCain - who made the worst foreign policy decision in decades when he voted to authorize Bush&amp;rsquo;s invasion of Iraq. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Obama is highly diplomatic in his personal style and never shrill or temperamental (unlike McCain), which will help win back good will around the world. He doesn&#039;t lose his cool or cry &amp;quot;shame&amp;quot; when he disagrees with someone. Rather, Obama knows how to bring people together and forge compromises - and this characteristic will help him immensely in any diplomatic initiatives he undertakes with foreign governments. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Obama is willing to meet with virtually any leader in the world without unnecessary bureaucratic preconditions (unlike McCain), thereby signaling a new, more open, stance for American foreign policy. He understands that the U.S. never stopped meeting with Soviet leaders during the Cold War, so why should we not meet with our enemies today? He contends that adequate preparation for such meetings is absolutely necessary, but continuing the obstructionist saber-rattling cowboy antics of the Bush Administration (as McCain &amp;nbsp;favors) will get us nowhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Obama knows how to prioritize national security concerns (unlike Bush and McCain) and will act accordingly in shifting the emphasis in the war on terror back to Afghanistan/Pakistan, where it truly belongs. Of course, he will also use his diplomatic skills to help bring together disparate Iraqi factions and fully involve Iraq&amp;rsquo;s Muslim neighbors and the United Nations in a multilateral effort to achieve lasting stability in the region. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Electing Barack Obama as President will be a clear and unambiguous signal to the world that the U.S. is charting a brand new course. Rather than looking backwards, the U.S. will be moving forward with fresh new ideas and innovative bipartisan approaches in foreign policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/daviddrissel/gG5zhC</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/daviddrissel/gG5zhC/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:52:58 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/daviddrissel/gG5zhC</guid>
            <dc:creator>David Drissel</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/f36cbb9f3302f60b1d_rw2mv2agc.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>David Drissel</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5zhC/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>How to overcome Obama’s lack of experience concern.</title>
            <description>&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Last night I talked with an informed friend and neighbor about who she would vote for in November.&amp;nbsp; Mind you she lives in California, which is not a battle ground state, but not all for Obama either.&amp;nbsp; Thoughtfully, she said Obama is too naive about the world issues, security especially and she will be voting for McCain because he has experience in these matters.&amp;nbsp; We then broke away from this topic and chatted about other things.&amp;nbsp; Not wanting to loose a vote, I approached her later with this question:&amp;nbsp; if Obama was to name his cabinet members early, before November and fill the positions with experienced, credible people will this change her vote?&amp;nbsp; Her answer:&amp;nbsp; yes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gbell/gGxyWk</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gbell/gGxyWk/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:26:31 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/gbell/gGxyWk</guid>
            <dc:creator>G. M. from Palo Alto, CA</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>G. M. from Palo Alto, CA</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxyWk/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Samantha Power on The Democrats &amp; National Security</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Samantha Power has a must-read article in the Aug. 14 issue of The NY Review of Books, titled The Democrats and National Security. Here&amp;rsquo;s an excerpt:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;How can Obama and his Democratic colleagues expose once and for all the fallacies in the conservative approach to national security, while putting forward a convincing alternative? They must start by not shying from the security debate or relying, with quiet relief, on polls showing that (unlike in 2004) only 4 percent of Americans today view terrorism as their top concern. Democrats must instead seize the advantage the polls show they could have on security issues. This means talking early and often about national security and going on the offensive by strongly presenting the foreign policy plans already devised, whether by members of Congress or by the Obama campaign. It also means explaining how each plan &amp;mdash;whether for retrieving loose nuclear material in the former Soviet Union or for assisting Iraqi refugees in Syria&amp;mdash; advances the central goal of keeping Americans safe. Democrats can break with their reputation for squeamishness about national security issues by showing their ease and confidence in dealing with these topics. Instead of changing the subject when national security issues arise, they should look forward to taking part in detailed foreign policy discussions that allow them to show their new strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They must also answer McCain&#039;s apocalyptic claims about the effects of a US withdrawal from Iraq. Too often on Capitol Hill or in the primary battle, Democrats have confidently suggested that since the US-led invasion brought savage sectarian killing to Iraq, a US departure will rid the country of much of its violence. Critics of President Bush have seemed to imply that no serious harm will flow from a US withdrawal. But American voters realize that the effects of a US drawdown are in fact unknowable. The failure to acknowledge any possible humanitarian or strategic risks of leaving makes Democrats sound less sophisticated than they are, and deprives them of the chance to describe their plans to draw down troops in a careful and strategically sound way. McCain&#039;s alarmist forecast thus goes unchallenged.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prominent Democrats must drive home the continuing costs of remaining in Iraq&amp;mdash;costs to Iraq, the region, Afghanistan, US military readiness, and national security as a whole&amp;mdash; while describing the specific ways an Obama administration would limit the harmful consequences of withdrawal. (In fact, Obama outlined such plans in a speech last year but it got little attention and needs reinforcement from the Democratic echo chamber.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama has long stated his intention to retain a Quick-Reaction Force in the region to carry out counterterrorism operations against al-Qaeda and other such networks. He has made clear his concern for Iraqi civilians in mixed neighborhoods who might be more vulnerable following a withdrawal of US combat brigades. He would offer these civilians fair notice of US plans and would be open to relocating those who would feel more secure if they moved. He has promised $2 billion to assist the two million Iraqi refugees in neighboring countries. He would establish a war crimes commission to gather the testimony of survivors and put militia leaders on notice that they may eventually be prosecuted. Obama&#039;s plan to meet with the region&#039;s heads of state is the first of many steps that will be required to prevent regional conflict.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;More here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21670&quot; title=&quot;Samantha Power&quot;&gt;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21670&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGxmhS</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGxmhS/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:27:21 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGxmhS</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bill Marjenhoff</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/323057b4f32d719bb1_c2m6bddvd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bill Marjenhoff</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxmhS/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>McCain, the Surge &amp; Iraq</title>
            <description>&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;It seems to me that with all the self proclamations of McCain relative to the supposed success of the surge in Iraq and therefore he has the true vision for the war and our country, someone in the campaign and/or media needs to take us all down memory lane.  Since McCain declares that he was behind the war from day one and he would do it over again, there is a need to start in the Fall of 2002.  Here are a few points that I recall:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Fall 2002; Senate Intelligence 	Committee issues a report on Iraq finding there was as much if not 	more &amp;ldquo;intelligence&amp;rdquo; stating that there were no WMDs and Al Qaeda 	presence in Iraq;&lt;/p&gt; 	&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Bush Administration plays up WMDs 	and Iraq Al Qaeda presence as terrorist threat and reason to take 	action;&lt;/p&gt; 	&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;U.S. invades and ousts Hussein, 	finds no presence of WMDs or Al Qaeda presence/interaction, botches 	transition and Al Qaeda establishes itself in Iraq;&lt;/p&gt; 	&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Four + years of extreme expense 	and bloodshed often aggravated by the post U.S. invasion Al Qaeda 	presence gets completely out of control necessitating a change of 	strategy ... hence the surge.&lt;/p&gt; 	&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Surge was to have military 	violence suppression (which most were confident out troops might 	accomplish) that would allow the Iraq political and economic 	conditions to move forward towards strengthening Iraq;&lt;/p&gt; 	&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Militarily the surge has been a 	success, some of the political and economic issues are starting to 	be but many of the major points are still outstanding .. in other 	words, the surge is far from being a complete success at this point 	in time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;My main point here is that although McCain is trying to play-up his backing of the surge success, that success is not yet complete and that he said he would do it all over again, aka topple a standing government that had no links to the terrorist group that attacked us on 9/11/2001.  If my recollection of the facts are on track, this is a message that needs to be delivered to the widest possible audience, then let the explanations begin.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;Thanks for listening.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jhickey55/gGxm4Q</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jhickey55/gGxm4Q/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:23:31 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jhickey55/gGxm4Q</guid>
            <dc:creator>Jim Hickey</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/8ad85c3bc1ba5e6994_y1wmv2lx0.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Jim Hickey</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxm4Q/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>About me and my blog</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m an average middle class American. &amp;nbsp;I&#039;m not employed by the government, by the press, or by an energy company. &amp;nbsp;I don&#039;t have a law degree, or any special training or qualifications that allow me to give a &amp;quot;professional opinion&amp;quot; on alternative energy. &amp;nbsp; I don&#039;t really consider myself a political activist; Sure, I&#039;ve signed a few petitions here and there, but who hasn&#039;t?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, I am very concerned about the state of our nation as it is. &amp;nbsp;Not only do we ourselves in the middle of an unjustified war in the name of &amp;quot;national security&amp;quot;, we find ourselves also in the middle of economic instability being fueled by rapidly increasing energy costs, and in the middle of a global climate crisis. &amp;nbsp;I feel very strongly that eliminating our dependency on fossil fuels is a solution to all of these pressing issues. &amp;nbsp;However, I&#039;ve come to realize that having strong feelings isn&#039;t enough to help foster the kind of changes that need to happen for this solution to come about. &amp;nbsp;It seems that energy companies and most people won&#039;t adopt this solution until it makes sense financially.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve decided to write this blog to share my thoughts on what can actions that ordinary Americans can take to help make this solution viable, and a better future for America possible. &amp;nbsp;I welcome any comments and other ideas on what can be done.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericsteffensen/gGx4Yp</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericsteffensen/gGx4Yp/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:59:25 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericsteffensen/gGx4Yp</guid>
            <dc:creator>Eric Steffensen</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/3a5916da176dd46bdd_ham6vjp8b.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Eric Steffensen</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGx4Yp/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Al Gore&#039;s Energy Proposal</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I just viewed Al Gore&#039;s speech on the 10 year quest for renewable energy. I urge everyone to view it and to consider what you can do to push awareness and involvement in this initiative. It is a well-considered unified strategy to address the environment, the economy and national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.wecansolveit.org/pages/al_gore_a_generational_challenge_to_repower_america/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jerryholtaway/gGx7rz</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jerryholtaway/gGx7rz/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:43:42 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jerryholtaway/gGx7rz</guid>
            <dc:creator>Jerry Holtaway</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/d6851806a9a8cdb0e2_0xm6bnwlw.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Jerry Holtaway</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGx7rz/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Obama: Confronting 21st Century Threats</title>
            <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/obama-fact-sheet-on-confronting-21st-century-threats/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Obama: Confronting 21st Century Threats&quot;&gt;http://thepage.time.com/obama-fact-sheet-on-confronting-21st-century-threats/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jgabriel/gGxPNp</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jgabriel/gGxPNp/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:24:23 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jgabriel/gGxPNp</guid>
            <dc:creator>jgabriel</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/954db80c01eade1212_okbmv241p.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>jgabriel</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxPNp/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Japan and energy policy</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Listening to Barack&#039;s speech on national security, two things really stuck out to me. First, Tokyo was the first city mentioned outside the Middle East. Second, Japan was mentioned first in the list of partnerships to strengthen. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope this ordering is more than a&amp;nbsp;coincidence. Japan is an ideal bilateral partner for investment in alternative energy. Rare among nations, they are still very&amp;nbsp;positively&amp;nbsp;inclined&amp;nbsp;towards the USA. This posture, coupled with the Japanese proclivity in government sponsored research, strong historic ties between Japanese and American business, and&amp;nbsp;an even deeper need for petroleum independence, indicates that cooperation would be fruitful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aligning the two largest economies on the Earth toward the common goal of energy independence could fundamentally change the course of history. That&#039;s a world I hope my children get to live in.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/frerichs/gGxPXs</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/frerichs/gGxPXs/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:44:19 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/frerichs/gGxPXs</guid>
            <dc:creator>dfRERICHS</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>dfRERICHS</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxPXs/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Notes from the historic road to change: Sunnyvale for Obama</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;This is a copy of an e-mail sent to the members of Sunnyvale for Obama on July 15, 2008.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Hello Sunnyvale for Obama! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A lot has happened since the last time I e-mailed you all!&amp;nbsp; The Unite for Change barbecue was a huge success with over 85 people in attendance!&amp;nbsp; And Sunnyvale for Obama now has 35 active members working on nine different project teams&amp;mdash;fundraising, voter registration, blogging, phone-banking, community service . . . you name it! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It&amp;rsquo;s great that we have so much happening in this area.&amp;nbsp; Your tremendous enthusiasm will be invaluable over the next four months as polls show that Sen. Obama currently trails Sen. McCain in projected Electoral College votes.&amp;nbsp; We have a lot to do to turn that around, and of course we can!&amp;nbsp; Many of you remember that Sen. Obama was way behind in the polls at some points in the primaries, and he proved that with grassroots support like ours, he could get his message out and win.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;rsquo;s time to prove it again! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So please be on the look-out for communications from your team leaders about the work you&amp;rsquo;ll do--and fun you&amp;rsquo;ll have!--on the movement for change. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IF YOU HAVEN&amp;rsquo;T SIGNED UP FOR ANY TEAMS YET, or if you&amp;rsquo;re new to the group, please see the relevant items in the table of contents, below, so we can get you informed and involved!&amp;nbsp; (The group is open to anyone in the area, not just Sunnyvale residents.) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Also, please be alert for a notification about the next general meeting.&amp;nbsp; We&#039;ll be having one soon! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In addition to e-mailing this, I&amp;rsquo;m going to post it to our group&amp;rsquo;s blog on our web page, accessible here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SunnyvaleCitizensforObama&quot;&gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SunnyvaleCitizensforObama&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Here&amp;rsquo;s a table of contents for this e-mail:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Results of Unite for Change BBQ on June 28&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Update on Cristiana&amp;rsquo;s Unite for Change house party &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; New member meetings (open to anyone in the area, not just Sunnyvale residents)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How to sign up for project teams&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How to stay informed about Sunnyvale for Obama activities&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sen. Obama&amp;rsquo;s newest speeches&amp;mdash;patriotism and national security&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sunnyvale for Obama&amp;rsquo;s beautiful t-shirts! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Anti-swiftboating for Obama&amp;mdash;fight the smears&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;If you&#039;re reading this in an RSS reader, you may have to click through to the blog in order to read the rest.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wadesanders/gGxPW4</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wadesanders/gGxPW4/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:06:50 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/wadesanders/gGxPW4</guid>
            <dc:creator>Wade Sanders</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/637361c3cebf17f0bc_b9m6b1jcv.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Wade Sanders</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxPW4/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Misdirected Outrage - Vote Obama</title>
            <description>The anger and frustration with Sen. Barack Obama for not voting against the FISA bill is misdirected. This is not to say that people should not disagree with Sen. Obama&#039;s decisions. However, the idea of working against him or abstaining from voting is perhaps one of the most fickle and dangerous positions to date. Make no mistake about it, John McCain will be worse than Bush! At a time when foreclosures loom as large as since the great depression, and so many of us have lost what we&#039;ve worked so hard to attain, John McCain intends to continue down this disastrous path. Much like Herbert Hoover, who during the great depression, determined that the crisis would have to work itself out, John McCain believes that government does not exist to help people, but rather create a privatized free market society in which government is called upon (in every capacity, except war) as an absolute last resort. In other words, the economic and environmental crisis we currently find ourselves in, will (without his help as president) have to work itself out. He states that he doesn&#039;t know much about economics, and that people are doing pretty well under the Bush Administration. John McCain, like Bush, wants to continue to hold Americans hostage, forcing us through high oil/propane prices to line the pockets of Exxon, Chevron and Halliburton etc. John McCain expects us through the free market to buy costly inadequate health insurance, and continue to make rich criminal health insurance companies! In addition, he intends to (for the first time in the history of this country) tax our company health insurance contributions! He wants greater corporate deregulation. He wants to re-establish offshore drilling and in particular, he wants to lessen regulation to quickly increase the number of nuclear power plants to 50 by the end of his first term, and 100 within ten years. This is without any consideration to environmental protection or public safety. Last but certainly not least, education. John McCain intends to redirect public education funds into the private sector, forcing all but the wealthy into an unattainable and unaffordable private school voucher system. This is reproachable and must be stopped! Now, President Bush and his administration circumvented FISA and broke the law! He wrote the letters directing the telecommunication companies to break the law by spying on Americans! Bush wrote the letters, and President Bush along with his administration broke the law. He needs to stand before a judge in criminal court as any one breaking the law would. President Bush broke the law when he decided to go around the FISA courts and re-write the law. Therefore, the expectation of the telecoms to ignore a direct request from the President of the United States, (during a time of extreme national crisis/terrorism) is as absurd as any of us ignoring a direct request from our bosses to carry out an inappropriate or perhaps unethical task -- most of us can&#039;t afford to quit our jobs, or be fired, or lose our health insurance, let alone face the possible consequences of refusing a direct order from the President of the United States. The absurdity lies not in disagreeing with Sen. Obama&#039;s decision, but making a decision to try to undermine his campaign! There is nothing I believe in more than holding political figures responsible for reprehensible actions. I am a firm believer that when politicians break laws, they should not stand above the law but rather be held more accountable to our nations judicial system than the civilian population. After all, the responsibility and oath undertaken by the President is to protect all of its citizens, not unethically or illegally turn against them. Regardless of our race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity or social status, the President of the United States of America is not supposed to abuse the power vested in him and turn against or spy on the citizens of the country. This is, however, exactly what President Bush and his administration has done. In many instances, this president/vice president have either lied, bent or broken the law. The situation with the telecommunication companies was no exception! President Bush broke the law, when he made the decision to bypass the FISA court! This is not to suggest that the telecommunication companies should not bear some guilt, but I do believe that in a world of government corruption and growing instability, we can not afford to have our telecommunications companies refuse participation -- when surveillance is lawfully requested by the FISA courts -- for fear they&#039;ll be sued. FISA must exist. Many of you are extremely unhappy with Sen. Obama&#039;s vote, and Obama himself admits that it was not the bill he would have drafted. However, it was different from the original bill in that it puts into place the inability for future Presidents or telecoms to bypass the FISA courts and supersede the law. While I recognize that many of you continue to be frustrated, I also recognize some confusion regarding Sen. Obama politically. It is critically important to read Barack&#039;s policy papers, examine his voting record, see where he stands on issues via his website, and listen to his policy discussions, to get a better understanding of his political positions. It would be a mistake to think of Sen. Obama as either a liberal or conservative democrat. Government is laced with complexities, and I would certainly appreciate a president who is intelligent and flexible. A president who examines the facts and actually cares about how the decisions of our federal legislative body will effect the environment and citizenry of the country, as well as the world. It matters not what theories I, or anyone upholds regarding the 911 tragedy. I believe FISA must exist, and would challenge anyone to be president for a day, and honestly suggest that we do not need to have the necessary legal measures in place to determine who or what organizations intend to do bad things to this country. As a 42 year old, trans lesbian, I hardly posit myself on the conservative side of the FISA issue, or any government policy. I consider myself an angry liberal democrat who views Sen. Obama as a pragmatic progressive moderate, and though I may not always agree with every position he takes, I can understand his point of view. Along with his understanding of constitutional law, personal insight and vast political as well as social experience, I trust his judgment and believe in his profound ability to move this country in a direction that is prosperous for all. I would not be working this hard to get him elected if I did not think it true. This country can not afford John McCain! I would not through understandable, though misdirected anger, want to tell a neighbor, elderly parent, child determined to be educated, farmer, laid off worker, veteran, pregnant teen or the people of Iraq, Afghanistan or Iran, that my disagreement with an Obama decision put John McCain in the White House! Not only is that a burden too great to bear, it is unforgivably irresponsible.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jtaylor/gGxTpd</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jtaylor/gGxTpd/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:31:20 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jtaylor/gGxTpd</guid>
            <dc:creator>J. from Montpelier, VT</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>J. from Montpelier, VT</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxTpd/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>EVERYONE CHECK THIS OUT!!!!</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We need NOT to forget about supporting Israel during these most critical times! She is the USA&#039;s most and ONLY true friend in these critical times!!! On the other hand, we are Israel&#039;s one and ONLY true friend in the world right now! With the growing threat of Iran, amongst other terrorist organizations, we must support our closest ally! God has destroyed every civilization throughout history that has tried to dispose of his people (Israel), throughout time. We need to take EVERY threat seriously (ie: Mahmoud, President of Iran) when they say they wish to destroy and murder Israel and her allies (us the USA), from the map!!! We need only to look back in the 1930&#039;s Germany when Hitler was using the SAME propaganda!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/PageServer?pagename=events_washington_summit&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The Bible commands us to pray for the peace of Jerusalem (Psalm 122:6), to speak out for Zion&amp;rsquo;s sake (Isaiah 62:1), to be watchmen on the walls of Jerusalem (Isaiah 62:6) and to bless the Jewish people (Genesis 12:3). These and so many other &lt;br /&gt;erses of the Bible that have one overriding message-- as Christians we have a Biblical obligation to defend Israel and the Jewish people in their time of need. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Israel&amp;rsquo;s time of need is now. There is a new Hitler in the Middle East --President Ahmadinejad of Iran -- who has threatened to wipe out Israel and America and is rapidly acquiring the nuclear technology to make good on his threat. If we learned anything from the Holocaust, it is that when a madman threatens genocide we must take him seriously. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;During the Holocaust, too many Christians were silent, and we were left to mourn the slaughter of 6 million Jews. Today, Bible-believing Christians must speak up and stand up for Israel. We must act to do whatever we can to protect Israel&amp;rsquo;s 6 million Jews from the second Holocaust. We must get it right this time. Our faith demands it. The times require it. Silence is not an option.&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/PageServer?pagename=event_Night_to_Honor_Israel_DC_2008&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericruggles/gGxDPQ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericruggles/gGxDPQ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:16:56 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericruggles/gGxDPQ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Eric from Dayton, OH</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Eric from Dayton, OH</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxDPQ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Keeping Focussed: Don&#039;t let the good become the enemy of the perfect</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Chip Pitts writes:(http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxfxK)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Today was a dark day indeed.&amp;nbsp; Our candidate, the candidate of change &amp;ldquo;we can believe in,&amp;rdquo; certainly changed his position on filibustering a terrible FISA bill.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, he did exactly what he told us he was going to do and the reason he was going to do it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He is OUR candidate. Not yours. OUR job is to get him elected. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You say &amp;quot;The members of this group are only the tip of the iceberg.&amp;quot; Let&#039;s look at what the iceberg might look like.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suppose&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; one-third of Obama&#039;s registered supporters favor your position, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;one third think that his decision was correct, balancing real security threats, the need to get legislation in place and political consideration one the one hand against providing immunity for PAST civil (but not criminal) misdeeds on the other. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And suppose one-third don&#039;t care and are happy to leave it to Obama. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now suppose 10 percent of your supporters are active and noisy, 2 percent of the supporters Obama&#039;s compromise are, and everyone else is quiet. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neither you nor I know exactly what the iceburg is like. My bet is that Obama has a much better sense. Seems like to me he did the right thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are talking about support, not agreement; and an entire program, not a single issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You state, &amp;quot;an immunity deal that will in all likelihood forever prevent the public from learning the full truth behind Bush&amp;rsquo;s illegal domestic spying.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Really? Why? And if so, it that worth &amp;quot;chipping&amp;quot; away at winning the election? Don&#039;t Nader us. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DGM &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PPPs/gGxD44</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PPPs/gGxD44/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:02:31 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PPPs/gGxD44</guid>
            <dc:creator>DGM</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/b533ae5e735be8a03c_607emv1ul.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>DGM</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>4</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxD44/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>A Dark Day for FISA and the campaign -- and a path toward the light?</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Today was a dark day indeed.&amp;nbsp; Our candidate, the candidate of change &amp;ldquo;we can believe in,&amp;rdquo; certainly changed his position on filibustering a terrible FISA bill that added new categories of warrantless surveillance and granted immunity to the big telecom companies complicit in the Bush administration&amp;rsquo;s warrantless spying.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Instead of offering strong, principled leadership on this issue, and using his power as the Democratic nominee to bring along the minority of Democratic Senators who supported this atrocious legislation, he and they joined the solid Republican bloc to ratify the most egregious aspects of the Bush administration&amp;rsquo;s approach to warrantless surveillance and enable an immunity deal that will in all likelihood forever prevent the public from learning the full truth behind Bush&amp;rsquo;s illegal domestic spying. We&amp;rsquo;re talking about a &lt;em&gt;Democratic&lt;/em&gt; Congress here &amp;ndash; facing a Republican president and a Republican party experiencing historically low public approval ratings!&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Today&amp;rsquo;s vote was a body blow to the rule of law, good government, transparency, accountability, due process of law, equal justice without regard to special interests, and core constitutional rights of privacy, free expression, assembly, free press, free religion (and the list goes on).&amp;nbsp; All of these rights and values are interrelated and act together to protect us and make us stronger.&amp;nbsp; When key strands unravel, all the rights and values are affected to a lesser or greater degree.&amp;nbsp; Such issues truly transcend partisan politics or loyalty to any one candidate to implicate the future not just of a political campaign but that of the nation and the world.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Today&amp;rsquo;s vote was also a personal blow to millions who believed that Sen. Obama was a different kind of politician.&amp;nbsp; The members of this group are only the tip of the iceberg.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I have said and would like to believe that Sen. Obama&amp;rsquo;s error of judgment likely resulted from bad advice given by consultants oblivious to the crucial importance of the candidate&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;brand&amp;rdquo; as a uniquely principled and constitutionally literate candidate.&amp;nbsp; Not realizing the different conditions presented by a public newly empowered by the internet and democratic social networking and other technologies, these consultants advised a candidate too busy to read the full bill himself to make the classic post-primary move to the supposed &amp;ldquo;center&amp;rdquo; in order to attract Republicans and independents in swing states.&amp;nbsp; But this isn&amp;rsquo;t a shift toward the center; fundamental constitutional issues like this aren&amp;rsquo;t of the left or right (or middle), but provide the foundation for all sides of the structure.&amp;nbsp; We know from his history, biography, and writings that Sen. Obama deeply understands this &amp;ndash; which is all the more reason that his u-turn is so unexpected and jarring.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&amp;rsquo;s politics were supposed to be less ideological, less partisan, less tied to special interests (like powerful telecommunications companies), and more sensitive to the basic American values of constitutional rights and principled pragmatism that, above all else, bind this diverse nation one to all.&amp;nbsp; The politics thus envisioned is &amp;ldquo;pragmatic&amp;rdquo; in the best sense of the word (focused on principled solutions that work), not in the worst sense (compromising on fundamental principle).&amp;nbsp; The difference between the two is precisely why Republicans, independents, and libertarians flocked to the candidate along with activist Democrats, progressives, young people, the elderly, and all sorts of new entrants into the political process.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The FISA/immunity issue more than most epitomized all this, representing an opportunity to transcend the politics of fear, misinformation, and ideological division -- an opportunity to affirm fact-based surveillance based on constitutionally required individual suspicion instead of deceptive, overbroad, counterproductive, wasteful, and dangerous dragnet surveillance, datamining, and unchecked executive power.&amp;nbsp; (Will this FISA bill&#039;s overbroad surveillance infrastructure really help capture real terrorists, or does it more closely resemble the inefficient, labyrinthine, and counterproductive Homeland Security Department?&amp;nbsp; Isn&amp;rsquo;t it much more likely that such a mammoth dragnet of everyone&#039;s communications can be avoided by terrorists as easily as they might avoid the stupid but feel-good requirement that we all remove our shoes every time we board an airplane?)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The McCain camp was always going to accuse Sen. Obama of being &amp;ldquo;soft on terror.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; His new brand of politics raised the hope of finally getting past such ridiculous and misleading false dichotomies.&amp;nbsp; At his best, he has proven himself to be singularly capable of doing this (e.g in his red state/blue state speech at the last Democratic convention, race speech in Philadelphia, etc).&amp;nbsp; Our country urgently needs such a return to practical reason if there&amp;rsquo;s to be any &amp;ldquo;hope&amp;rdquo; of tackling the tremendous problems faced.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;There is a possible path to heal this breach of trust with his disenchanted supporters, difficult as that may be to conceive at this point.&amp;nbsp; This group&amp;rsquo;s members have drafted an open letter at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getfisaright.com/&quot;&gt;www.getFISAright.com&lt;/a&gt; which you&amp;rsquo;re all invited to sign.&amp;nbsp; That letter asks Sen. Obama to take three concrete and specific actions aimed at reaffirming, despite this vote, his commitment to the rule of law, transparency, accountability, and preserving the Constitution and Bill of Rights.&amp;nbsp; He has, after all, asked his supporters to hold him accountable, which is exactly the point of&amp;nbsp;this letter and this group&amp;nbsp;in the run-up to the November elections.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Bob Herbert of the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; yesterday&amp;nbsp;quoted Obama&amp;rsquo;s pledge to be someone &amp;ldquo;who will listen to you and &lt;em&gt;learn&lt;/em&gt; from you, even when we disagree.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; In the Wiki Age, this need not be &amp;ndash; cannot be -- mere campaign rhetoric.&amp;nbsp; A new politics is still possible.&amp;nbsp; And it is up to us as much as is up to Senator Obama to make it so.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxfxK</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxfxK/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxfxK</guid>
            <dc:creator>Chip Pitts</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9224d07cd9b91d20a6_elm6b3i75.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Chip Pitts</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>8</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxfxK/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The hour has come</title>
            <description>The decision is about to be made. Hundreds of us have commented on this blog in the fiercest, best informed and most principled thread of statements I&#039;ve ever had the privelege of being part of. If Sen Obama reads the entire stream, he will be moved and he will learn. The best, I believe, was from &quot;Active Voice&quot; who counseled taking the FISA bill off the table until after the election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of us feel angry, disillusioned, betrayed, disappointed (&quot;Sen Obama, you have broken my heart&quot;) but most are brave and wise enough to know the Senator can do better than he was yet done on FISA and perhaps today, if the bill is not tabled, he will reverse course, yet again, and lead the fight against it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can hope, can&#039;t we? If hope doesn&#039;t do it, we have other options.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxfzj</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxfzj/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:15:15 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxfzj</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bluejane</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9b297466e0459223d1_avemv2znf.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bluejane</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxfzj/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Telco immunity? Ask whistleblower Mark Klein</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Senator Obama, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since you seem to be fact-challenged about the FISA bill, for example claiming the FISA amendments provide adequate oversight measures when in fact they do not, on the issue of &lt;strong&gt;telco immunity&lt;/strong&gt; you might want to read an in-depth &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/7/att_t_whistleblower_urges_against_immunity&quot;&gt;interview conducted today with Mark Klein&lt;/a&gt;, a long-time AT&amp;amp;T employee and communications specialist who was a witness to massive NSA wiretapping via AT&amp;amp;T through a secret room in San Francisco. Mr. Klein is a chief witness in a lawsuit being brought against AT&amp;amp;T for illegal warrantless surveillance; the suit will be stopped dead in its tracks by the new FISA bill which you support, so that the American people will never know the extent of the wiretapping or the facts of what happened and justice will never be served for breaking the law at the highest levels of government, rendering the rule of law meaningless. Granting immunity to the telcos will cover up not only their wrongdoing (they have huge staffs of lawyers who knew what they were doing was illegal even if &amp;quot;requested&amp;quot; by the White House like the Nixon White House whose spying on political opponents was the rationale for setting up FISA in the first place) -- this immunity provision will cover up Bush-Cheney White House crimes as well. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator Obama, you are supporting retroactive &lt;strong&gt;legislative obstruction of justice&lt;/strong&gt;. Here&#039;s a brief excerpt from Mr. Klein followed by a link to the extensive interview transcript:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mark Klein&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;In 2003 I was assigned to that office [in San Francisco], and I got hold of the documents which were available&amp;mdash;they&amp;rsquo;re not classified&amp;mdash;and the documents showed what they were doing. They were basically copying the entire data stream going across critical internet cables and copying the entire data stream to this secret room, so the NSA was getting everything.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/7/att_t_whistleblower_urges_against_immunity&quot;&gt;full transcript&lt;/a&gt; of the interview with Mark Klein.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator Obama, you said that if some of us find your support of this FISA bill to be a deal-breaker, &amp;quot;that would be fine.&amp;quot; This was sarcastic and arrogant. It would &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;be fine.&amp;quot; To say so is to dismiss out of hand the concerns of those of us who adhere to the Constitution which&lt;strong&gt; does not lie on a partisan spectrum&lt;/strong&gt;, as in &amp;quot;moving to the center&amp;quot; which, in the case of FISA, means moving toward Bush-Cheney&#039;s extra-legal, extra-Constitutional anarchy/executive tyranny. Your statement was the height of dismissive condescension and I hope you reconsider your position (yet again) and &lt;strong&gt;vote against the FISA bill&lt;/strong&gt; including the immunity provision.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve heard you might have changed your stance on FISA to &lt;strong&gt;impress the intelligence community&lt;/strong&gt;. You might rationalize this flawed, unconstitutional bill to burnish your credentials for being &amp;quot;tough on terror&amp;quot; because this way of thinking about it, from the intel point of view, might seem &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot; in your own mind and impressive to the big boys in the military-intelligence complex and hence not a betrayal of the Constitution or the rule of law. But the fact is -- and you know this -- the intelligence community is perfectly capable of obtaining probable cause warrants for surveillance on an individual basis through the secret FISA court, as they always have, with plenty of time, even several days after the fact with all sorts of leeway. The FISA court is nearly a &lt;strong&gt;rubber stamp &lt;/strong&gt;and you know it&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This means this entire problem boils down to the Executive Branch &lt;strong&gt;asking permission&lt;/strong&gt; of Congress and the courts (in this case FISA). The Bush-Cheney administration never wanted to ask for permission from anybody and never did, even as a formality from a rubber stamp court, instead seeking to elevate the powers of the executive branch over and above the other two branches without any sort of accountability. &lt;u&gt;This is a fundamental truth about the FISA debate&lt;/u&gt;. But you&#039;re a different player, potentially a different president, and you know perfectly well that the telcos will continue to cooperate with the intel community without being granted amnesty because they will be&lt;strong&gt; presented with warrants&lt;/strong&gt; with which they will be forced to comply. The FISA warrants for wiretaps needed to keep track of suspected terrorists can easily be obtained as they always have, no problem. You know this. Don&#039;t be impressed by the intel professional technocrats, the boys with the fancy computers at the NSA. If you become our president, you will be a crucial civilian buffer between them and the American people to protect our civil liberties. This will be your job but already you are giving away the store. Stop, pivot, turn and look at what you are doing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A great leader would make this a &amp;quot;teachable moment&amp;quot; and explain these facts clearly to the American people. We need a president who will restore the Constitution and dismantle the Bush-Cheney unitary executive &amp;quot;uber powers.&amp;quot; Only a child impressed by intel guys and military brass or one who is afraid of GOP schoolyard bully tactics of being called &amp;quot;soft on terror&amp;quot; would be so easily swayed to swallow this FISA deal. I don&#039;t want a president who is an impressionable, frightened child. You have 4 months to grow up, Senator Obama. I&#039;ll be watching and deciding whom to vote for. Don&#039;t be deluded into thinking Dems have &amp;quot;nowhere else to go.&amp;quot; We can go to &amp;quot;not you.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxlYb</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxlYb/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:41:52 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxlYb</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bluejane</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9b297466e0459223d1_avemv2znf.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bluejane</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxlYb/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Jan 20, 2009: My Faux Inaugural Address for Obama</title>
            <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bp2.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJpytbM1tI/AAAAAAAAAgQ/rPO2RrsVa5k/s1600-h/lincoln.bmp&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;img XSSCleaned=&quot;float: left; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; cursor: hand&quot; src=&quot;http://bp2.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJpytbM1tI/AAAAAAAAAgQ/rPO2RrsVa5k/s400/lincoln.bmp&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[History of our Country&amp;rsquo;s Patriotism]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;The time was mid-summer, 1776. A powerful nation stood as an insurmountable barrier to the prosperity and operation of a 170-year old colony of thirteen, then divided. The previous decade had seen tumultuous and dangerous circumstances rule the day. No one felt free; and the far away King did not listen. Crisis was assured.&lt;p&gt;The wisest course of action would have been to accept the situation as is: to not infuriate and throw off the mighty government that held sway; to give up in the darkest hours of a fledgling Nation under haphazard leadership; to deny the Dream of Peace, Prosperity and Freedom. But our Forefathers determined that it was a time to break those bonds and strike a new accord. To declare it could do better and should be free to design its future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In our 232 years as a Nation hence, we the people have forged an everlasting union to the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence. That we shall evince an equitable design for all Man to see; to make Freedom our truest value; that a single Proclamation can change the Course of human events; and that all Men shall be Equal under God Almighty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In those same 232 years, we have past through trying times and evolved through the world events and the ingenuity of Man, of America. That even in conflict, we reached for the same founding ideals, the same credos, the same hope to guide us to a better day and build upon the unshakeable foundation we shall never succumb, and never allow to be compromised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are the generation of settlers born out of Plymouth Rock. We are the Puritans and Lutherans. We are the merchants, the farmers, the toilers in the trades. We are the writers and founders of American Independence. We are the Natives of this land. We are the downtrodden and the dreamers. The Immigrants of Europe, Asia and Africa. We are the Gilded Age, the voices of tired laborers, wounded soldiers, Western prairie settlers and the caregivers in times of war, and of peace. We are survivors of Two World Wars. The people of the hardest times, The Great Depression. The Boomers who came after them. We also bore witness to a hidden war; we bare witness now to a nation still divided by color, creed and disproportionate prosperity since Vietnam. And we continue to forge ahead; through crises, and the completion of our inspired mission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have also found fellowship in our mutual belief in humanity. The cause of designing a new Nation. The dreams of our fathers and mothers. And the sacrifices of our sons and daughters made time and time again. This hearty experiment in Democracy, which has spread to the far reaches of the Earth, has been buttressed on the unfettered and unquenchable fire of liberty burning in the bellies of the American people. We are all responsible for its existence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[Challenges of the past eight years] &lt;a href=&quot;http://bp3.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJr5gE1OSI/AAAAAAAAAgg/uwqdUbWFaAk/s1600-h/jfk.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img XSSCleaned=&quot;float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; cursor: hand&quot; src=&quot;http://bp3.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJr5gE1OSI/AAAAAAAAAgg/uwqdUbWFaAk/s320/jfk.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;As we take stock of our most recent events, the designs and desires of various masters, it is best to separate ourselves from that, and those, that have done us greatest harm by understanding our needs for Justice must not be at the price of our Principles. As President Kennedy intoned: &amp;ldquo;When power leads man toward arrogance, poetry reminds him of his limitations. When power narrows the areas of man&amp;rsquo;s concern, poetry reminds him of the richness and diversity of existence. When power corrupts, poetry cleanses. For art establishes the basic human truth which must serve as the touchstone of our judgment.&amp;rdquo; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03Amherst10261963.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;[Amherst College, Oct. 26, 1963.]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our nation&amp;rsquo;s power comes from an abiding strength in it, and the wise frugality of its use; but also the knowledge that the repository of our power is vast, and can be unleashed with rapidity. To garner Justice we will do whatever it takes without hesitation. In the use of such power we will employ that which will protect us, and keep us Free as our Forefathers rightfully designed. But the Poetry of America is to decree Our Rights are sacrosanct; untouchable by foreign and alien ideologies. We shall prevail over all enemies with our adamant poetry and our indomitable spirit. Our Security will be eyed clearly; under a will, resolute; and our Nation shall carry forth a strong message to all that would seek to do us harm. But our everlasting American spirit is promote Justice in our relationships; cultivate peace and harmony; and to seek out prosperous alliances iron bound in fairness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[The present &amp;amp; future agenda]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Within the boundaries of this great Nation, lie incalculable resources and an innovative spirit yet untapped. America&amp;rsquo;s necessity always breeds American innovation. It runs in the blood of all of us. That is why in our present environmental and energy confinements there are opportunities to grow beyond &lt;a href=&quot;http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/congress.htm&quot;&gt;the dogmas of the past, which lack the ability to confront the stormy present&lt;/a&gt;. That is why we will beat back our future&amp;rsquo;s most perilous foe, that of economic instability from&amp;nbsp;scant energy sources, before the year 2020. Hindsight will see this day, this moment, as the point where America decided on the best course to free ourselves from a five-score dependence on fossil fuels. But it is that greatest resource of all, our ingenuity in the face of greatest peril, which will win the day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bp2.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJr5uWw-4I/AAAAAAAAAgY/qfl0aYL98Tc/s1600-h/fdr.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img XSSCleaned=&quot;float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; cursor: hand&quot; src=&quot;http://bp2.blogger.com/_SaoTj-aTf-I/SHJr5uWw-4I/AAAAAAAAAgY/qfl0aYL98Tc/s320/fdr.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We will also forge a new path to make it possible for all Americans to survive in the worst of unforeseen circumstances: that of ill health and debilitating hospital stays. Our government has often succeeded in giving a hand to those less fortunate in the worst of times. To create jobs; to revitalize the markets; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres49.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to make a New Deal for Americans&lt;/a&gt;. It is time to do the same for the sick and unable to pay their medical bills. As we are all too aware, our personal health is at the foundation of our economic vitality. Nearly 20% of our economy is tied to deterioration of health. But with this enormous price, one-fifth of America cannot continue to achieve greater prosperity. It is vital that we address this shortcoming before my first term is out. Achieve a balanced solution that gives the best care at the lowest possible cost. And utilize again the best minds and opportunities to achieve universal healthcare in America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More measures will be taken to secure our Nation&amp;rsquo;s future. We will not lock out those who desire access to the promise and prosperity of America, but we will not allow foreign passage to make a mockery of our laws. We will forcefully hold our sovereignty by the standards laid in the Constitution of the United States of America. We will hold clear and open discussions about the legitimate right to seek legal asylum in this great nation and remedy those that are here all ready under inauspicious terms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will reinvest in our educational systems; build better, and up-to-date transit systems; and make fair the tax laws and legal precedents of America, for all Americans. Yes we can reach for the stars and fill our breadbaskets. We can reconstitute an age of volunteerism, building infrastructure and homes and levies so they will not break. We shall make a promise to assist those in need and ask only they put their best foot forward. We can &lt;em&gt;and shall&lt;/em&gt; help our Veterans who toiled bravely thousands of miles from their homes so that our streets and towns can remain prosperous and free.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;[The greatness of America harnessed again]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We can do this all with the humble sacrifice and the forceful temerity that bore our Forefathers so well in their most trying times. It is the nature and depth of their sacrifice that brought us to this auspicious moment as the greatest Nation on the face of this Earth. A Nation that shall not perish with the undoubted sacrifices made by those that properly ask what they can do for this country in continuing to make it a Nation for the People, by the People and of the People.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;God Bless America!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ideas from Kennedy, FDR, Lincoln and Washington are included in the passages. Apologies for my butchering of them&amp;hellip;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deepcenterfield/gGxlfn</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deepcenterfield/gGxlfn/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:19:18 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deepcenterfield/gGxlfn</guid>
            <dc:creator>nomarless</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/de6425913bd37c00f9_enwmv2oen.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>nomarless</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxlfn/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The Practical Relevance of the FISA/Immunity Issue</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;One of our fellow Obama supporters asked whether this FISA/immunity issue matters at all.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;Is anybody going to die?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;What does this have to do with my bills, gas, healthcare?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a rough and quick response, I offer two preliminary answers &amp;ndash; one short (and more short term) and one a bit more distant/long-term:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The short/short-term answer:&amp;nbsp; I&#039;ve visited a number of dictatorships, both before and after the fall of the Berlin wall.&amp;nbsp; Ubiquitous spying&amp;nbsp;can cause lots of people and entire societies serious, depressing, meaningful psychological harm;&amp;nbsp;it tends to result in arbitrary, conflict-producing, brittle governments resorting to unfair practices including political repression, stifled dissent,&amp;nbsp;and discrimination against vulnerable groups or dissenters/creative types/artists/intellectuals.&amp;nbsp; Societies that take that approach (e.g. East Germany, where a significant portion of the populace were employed by or informants for the Stasi secret police) tend not to do very well in terms of achieving the economic prosperity that allows them to pay bills, buy gas, get health care, etc.&amp;nbsp; Beyond that, the individuals affected often have no way to challenge the justness of the actions taken against them -- just ask those trying to get off the terrorist watch or no-fly lists -- and some often even suffer physical harm (including arbitrary imprisonment).&amp;nbsp; Again, this isn&#039;t speculation:&amp;nbsp; US citizens and many others have already been imprisoned for years without due process or rights to contest the (secret) evidence against them.&amp;nbsp; In the USA (!) as well as at Gitmo and other prisons, secret and&amp;nbsp;overt, abroad.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Illusory measures like this FISA Amendments Bill, which like the &amp;ldquo;shoes off&amp;rdquo; routine at the airport give you the false comfort of feeling secure (while being easily evaded by genuine terrorists), and that&amp;nbsp;avoid the truly effective fact-based, hard, detailed intelligence gathering that&#039;s proved empirically successful against terrorists, will also mean that you, yours, and the nation are more (not less) vulnerable&amp;nbsp;to risk of a terror attack, because of the inevitable mission creep and diversion of resources involved and the false feeling that&amp;nbsp;we&#039;ve taken effective action when we&#039;ve actually&amp;nbsp;taken only the easy, false-comfort, self-defeating route that actually alienates the populations most able to provide&amp;nbsp;actionable&amp;nbsp;intelligence.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Such spying is&amp;nbsp;also is of a piece with the same theory of untrammeled executive power that underlies other arbitrary and unfair, counterproductive actions we&#039;ve seen in recent years&amp;nbsp;from the Bush administration:&amp;nbsp; it&amp;nbsp;renews&amp;nbsp;a precedent for, and encourages the slippery slope of e.g. torture, indefinite detention, secret and lawless prisons, kidnapping, and extraordinary rendition.&amp;nbsp; These actions&amp;nbsp;have indisputably&amp;nbsp;left us less powerful and&amp;nbsp;less safe in the world&amp;nbsp;-- despite the fatuous, illogical, and self-serving&amp;nbsp;Bush/McCain rhetoric that &amp;quot;well, at least there&#039;s been no attack since 9/11!&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; [It&#039;s another subject, but in addition to confusing correlation with causation, that argument reveals ignorance of al Qaeda and its modus operandi (multi-years between attacks, striving for the spectacular, etc), of memos from al Qaeda that have been captured and say that the strategy is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to attack the US right now, and of the adversary&amp;rsquo;s morphing (according to Rand Corporation and other sources) into a stronger, more decentralized, global franchise.]&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An answer more for the long-term:&amp;nbsp; if these FISA amendments pass, with or without the telecom immunity envisaged, the amended law&amp;nbsp;enshrining the hi-tech Bush surveillance and datamining approach will change America in subtle but profound and enduring ways, to the point that we simply&amp;nbsp;won&#039;t be the same country we&#039;ve been or share many of the vital, core&amp;nbsp;principles that we&#039;ve shared essentially since the founding (although it&#039;s those principles more than anything else that bind us together).&amp;nbsp; Recall that on that other July 4th, in 1776, a major reason&amp;nbsp;for the revolution was King George&#039;s assertions of arbitrary, unchecked power, including&amp;nbsp;the &amp;quot;general&amp;quot; (unspecified)&amp;nbsp;warrants that resulted in searches of the colonists&#039; homes without any sort of notice, specific fact-based&amp;nbsp;warrant or probable cause/individualized suspicion.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That arbitrary, unfair, and tyrannical practice without checks and balances tore the social fabric then, and today&amp;rsquo;s updated techno-version will just as surely tear the social fabric in insidious ways now and in the future.&amp;nbsp; This effect won&#039;t be immediately apparent&amp;nbsp;or visible, but it will matter tremendously for your long-term future and that of any children,&amp;nbsp;grandchildren, or&amp;nbsp;those of relatives you may have.&amp;nbsp;At least that&#039;s my grave concern.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re-read Orwell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxd4Q</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxd4Q/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:40:08 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/chippitts/gGxd4Q</guid>
            <dc:creator>Chip Pitts</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9224d07cd9b91d20a6_elm6b3i75.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Chip Pitts</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxd4Q/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Barack: Are you flim-flamming the American people?</title>
            <description>Dear Sen Obama,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Kindly respond to the following:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Barack&lt;/strong&gt; said: &amp;quot;But in a free society, that authority [to collect intelligence] cannot be unlimited. As I&#039;ve said many times, an independent monitor must watch the watchers to prevent abuses and to protect the civil liberties of the American people. This compromise law assures that the FISA court has that responsibility.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Glenn Greenwald&lt;/strong&gt; said: &amp;quot;This is &lt;strong&gt;just false&lt;/strong&gt;. The new FISA bill that Obama supports vests new categories of warrantless eavesdropping powers in the President, and allows the Government, for the first time, to tap physically into U.S. telecommunications networks inside our country with no individual warrant requirement. To claim that this new bill creates &amp;quot;an independent monitor [to] watch the watchers to prevent abuses and to protect the civil liberties of the American people&amp;quot; is truly &lt;strong&gt;misleading&lt;/strong&gt;, since the new FISA bill actually does the &lt;strong&gt;opposite&lt;/strong&gt; -- it frees the Government from exactly that monitoring in all sorts of broad categories.&amp;quot; **&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; With respect, Senator, as one who voted for you in the primaries but reviewing my November options because of this and other slip-slides, did you &lt;strong&gt;not read the bill&lt;/strong&gt;? Or were you &lt;strong&gt;lying&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; ** (Glenn Greenwald, 7-3-08, emphasis mine. &lt;a href=&quot;http://utdocuments.blogspot.com/2008/07/obamas-new-statement-on-fisa.html&quot;&gt; Read Greenwald&#039;s full response to Obama&#039;s FISA stance including Obama&#039;s absurd support for telco immunity&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxds9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxds9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:03:58 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gGxds9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bluejane</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9b297466e0459223d1_avemv2znf.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bluejane</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>5</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxds9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The Right  Decision on FISA</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I write to express my support for Senator Obama&#039;s decision to vote for the FISA legislation in the Senate while seeking to elminate the Service provider immunity provision.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have been deeply engaged with FISA since it was first proposed in the early 1970s and have been actively engaged in trying to improve the current legislation including by testifying before congressional committees.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The simple fact is that the alternative to Congress passing this bill was for Congress to enact the far worse legislation that the Senate had already passed by a&amp;nbsp;filabuster proof margin and which a majority of House members were on record as supporting.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill that will come to the Senate floor next week is far from perfect -- neither was the origninal FISA legislation -- but it provides important safeguards for civil liberties.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The legislation provides effective mechanisms for oversight of the new surveillance authorities both by the FISA court and by the House and Senate Judiciary as well as Intelligence Committees.&amp;nbsp; It mandates a series of reports by officials in the executive branch including IGs that will provide the committees with the information they need to conduct this oversight.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For the first time it requires FISA court warrants for surveillance of Americans overseas.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am confident that ,bassed on the report he will receive from his AG, President Obama will propose and Congress will enact needed improvements especially dealing with possible surveillance of persons in the United States.&amp;nbsp; I also believe that support for this legislation now reflects an understanding about how best to protect both our national security and our civil liberties.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I certainly understand and respect the views of those who urge a no vote; they were expressed as forcefully when Congress enacted FISA.&amp;nbsp; But I hope that those who take this position will at least accept that those who disagree have the same devotion to protecting civil liberties as they do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mortonhalperin/gGxdqm</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mortonhalperin/gGxdqm/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:16:56 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/mortonhalperin/gGxdqm</guid>
            <dc:creator>Morton from Washington, DC</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Morton from Washington, DC</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxdqm/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Immunity under FISA</title>
            <description>Senator Obama has written a blog in defense of his support for the FISA bill with immunity for past Surveillance actions under the Bush Administration. The blog is here: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/rospars/gGxsZF/commentary#comment-glsSX&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the reason Senator Obama is giving in to pressure from the administration is because he thinks he is weak on National Security issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By giving immunity to past actions you are just saying that the Bush administration was right in the first place. Why else will you give immunity. If the Republicans think passing the FISA bill is very important they will join in passing it even without the immunity. We all know that the provisions that expire this summer will not leave us without surveillance capacity. Immunity will not make us safer it will make us unsafe. It will not make you look strong and tough but weak and malleable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expediency impresses nobody. This again gets you no point on National Security. This is not the time for an &quot;Expedient President.&quot; If you take a stand on this issue it will show your strength and toughness. Senator McCain and President Bush keep talking about unrelated provisions and strings attached in bills passed by Congress (pork barrel politics etc.) This is your time to say the same about them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama, it is extremely important that you develop some initiative and show some action against extremism and fanaticism. If you don&#039;t develop your own line of action you will continue to get pressured by the Administration and its allies and by November they will paint you into a fox or a crow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had written you a letter earlier on the subject of Extremism: Mature way of addressing Extremism in America and abroad. Link&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am sure if you think hard about it and compare my suggestions with other options you have, you will see that it will be a good beginning. I hope your policy team reads it and compares it with other options they are working on the subject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
National Security is an important issue. We like you because we think you are different from the current Administration. Going along with the current administration is no way to show your new vision on National Security. Please be proactive and show some new style and substance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don&#039;t give in. Take initiative and define your own positions. We are all counting on you to be strong and firm.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gGxd3C</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gGxd3C/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:56:09 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gGxd3C</guid>
            <dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Sahil</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxd3C/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>What happened to our progressive candidate</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Since the nomination has been sewn up, what has happened to our progressive candidate? This most recent comment from Barack on FISA has left me with a big hole in the pit of my stomach:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;My view on FISA has always been that the issue of the phone companies per se is not one that overrides the security interests of the American people.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;This isn&#039;t a question of the phone companies vs. national security. This is a question of honoring the Constitution or not. Can the Executive shred the 4th amendment on a whim and give get out of jail free cards to his (or her) accomplices, or not? Frankly, our national security isn&#039;t worth defending if we don&#039;t respect our constitution. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/terryspring/gGxskT</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/terryspring/gGxskT/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:30:14 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/terryspring/gGxskT</guid>
            <dc:creator>Terry from Redmond, WA</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Terry from Redmond, WA</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>4</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxskT/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Are we Locked in and taken for granted?</title>
            <description>Is the Obama campaign taking advantage of those of us who have been committed to him from the start. Is he thinking that we&#039;re in the bag and therefore he can slip-slide away from positions of principle which helped us give him his start? When I send him money, I have to drop something else out of our budget. He needs to understand that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FISA compromise in the Senate is a compromise which gives away our civil rights. Remember the Patriot Act? That&#039;s when our concerns first surfaced. Now with the new FISA legislation and immunity for the telecoms we need to oppose strongly any compromise with the Republican/Bush alliance to step on civil rights. We want Senator Obama to stand up and be heard against this bill. If we lose our enthusiasm for his campaign he will lose the election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same goes for the Wes Clark flap. What he said was true. I depend on &lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama to stand up for truth. McCain has no special qualifications in foreign policy and national security except as he is a listener to canned briefings by the Administration and occasional &#039;show and tell&#039; visits to foreign countries where Members are led around by the nose by the Embassy action officer for the CODEL trip. Don&#039;t let McCain claim to be the foreign policy and national security candidate. Did Reagan have any experience, Bush II, Carter, Clinton, Ford, Nixon? None of them did. I spent seventeen years in the executive branch working for DoD and State in foreign policy and national security. I&#039;ve negotiated treaties after pushing them through the NSC apparatus and kept Congress under control. I&#039;ve briefed Senators, Senate Committees and baby-sat their trips abroad where we make sure they see and hear what we want them to see and hear.  That&#039;s experience and you don&#039;t get it on the outside. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let Senator Obama speak forcefully that foreign policy and national security experience is only obtained by service in policy jobs in the executive branch and all Presidents without that experience must learn on the job. They need a cool-head, great analytical skills, an internationally agreeable personality, hopefully, some negotiating skills and great advisors.  Senator Obama has, or can have, all these things. He should be saying so and take no back seat-to McCain. This could be the issue on which he loses the election. The voters don&#039;t know what foreign policy and national security experience is. Senator Obama must tell them what it is and show that he has what it takes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he&#039;s not getting this kind of advice because he is surrounded by experts who know campaigning better than anything else or if his foreign policy and national security advisor isn&#039;t pumping him up in preparation for his European and Iraq trip with both facts and self confidence, he could blow it. Don&#039;t take Europe for granted. They are skilled and selfish. Just because they hated Bush they won&#039;t automatically transfer love to Obama. We need to show Americans that he is respected abroad. His trip has to be on the news every night. The Republicans will be back in Washington figuring out ways to capture the lead story on the network and cable news so he gets shut out. You need a strategy for getting on the news every night in first position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Campaigning and governing lie in stark contrast to each other. Show the voters he will govern by being decisive, taking risks, backing down only when he knows he&#039;s wrong and standing up for his surrogates when they are right. That&#039;s the kind of strength voters are looking for. It goes without saying that want brains after having stupidity in the White House for eight years. But by now i think the voters know he&#039;s smart.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/LeighR/gGxsrg</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/LeighR/gGxsrg/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:38:47 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/LeighR/gGxsrg</guid>
            <dc:creator>Leigh R</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/42d2c039b1ebf610bc_rdm6iypj2.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Leigh R</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxsrg/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Barack, Meet Ben</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Barack Obama likes to pepper his speeches with references to the Founding Fathers. If he holds them in such reverence, then perhaps he should listen to the wisdom of one of our most wise:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Benjamin_Franklin_by_Jean-Baptiste_Greuze.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Benjamin Franklin&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; - &lt;em&gt;Benjamin Franklin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is Barack Obama&#039;s test of courage and leadership. Will he cave to the forces of fear-mongering that says a bad compromise is the only way for Democrats to demonstrate that they aren&#039;t weak on national security or will he stand by his earlier commitment, to preserve and protect the Constitution and the civil liberties of everyday Americans? Sen. Obama, please vote against the FISA compromise.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/AngryDesi/gGxsWD</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/AngryDesi/gGxsWD/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:39:38 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/AngryDesi/gGxsWD</guid>
            <dc:creator>AngryDesi</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>AngryDesi</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>4</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxsWD/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>FISA, Dissing Moveon, Throwing Clark Under the Bus... It&#039;s a Bad Scene.</title>
            <description>This is exactly the kind of behavior that Hillary displayed that made me want to vote for Obama. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I used to have good reasons for voting for Obama. I would tell people, &amp;quot;Here&#039;s a guy who actually has the skills and political acumen to challenge the fairy tale the mainstream media spins about Democrats and national security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; What, you don&#039;t know the fairy tale? It goes like this:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &amp;quot;Once upon a time, a Very Bad Thing called 9/11 happened. Fortunately, the manly, strong leader named Bush was in charge (never mind what he was doing right before) and so he started not one, but TWO wars to get revenge on the dirty, freedom-hating (and oh-so-incidentally, Muslim) terrorists who did this Very Bad Thing. Not only that, but he started spying on people--all kinds of people! even Americans!--to find out what those nasty terrorists were doing. The fact that starting those wars and spying on people were illegal under international and domestic law only shows how tough and manly President Bush really is. If there were another terrorist attack, it would only go to show that we didn&#039;t start enough wars, torture enough foreigners, and spy on enough Americans to really get the job done. Anyone (cough! Democrats! cough!) who DOESN&#039;T want to start wars illegally and spy on law-abiding Americans is a pussy-whipped pinko pansy. The end.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Anyway, I had seen Obama challenging this ridiculous narrative, and pointing out, as I believe is right to do, that declaring preemptive wars, violating civil rights, and torturing POWs (whatever you call them) makes us less safe. Indeed, not only is this the morally superior position, it is also, in my humble opinion, a winning strategy. I base that opinion on the fact that most Americans don&#039;t want their government spying on them, don&#039;t want their government torturing people, and don&#039;t want their troops bogged down in a civil war in a country that never attacked America. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Then again, this election isn&#039;t about what most Americans want, is it? My cynicism took a brief hiatus for Obama&#039;s rise to the nomination, but with his rightward shift, now it&#039;s back again. Once again, we are seeing that the Democratic party is controlled by people whose interests are completely alien to the interests of the people who give them their votes. The trick is to market the party to us, the people, then, once it&#039;s in the bag, get back to the business of America, which is business, i.e., protecting the ruinous profits of corporations which exploit people here and abroad, and trash the environment, all for a quick buck. In order to do this, it&#039;s necessary to do exactly what Obama&#039;s been doing: distance yourself from the Democratic base that got you into power, and define their interests as the interests of crazy, kooky, far-left radicals. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; So now Obama is aiding and abetting that process, whereby people who care about the rule of law and protecting the constitution are characterized as crazy lefty radicals. Just great. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; There&#039;s a lot at stake in this election. This may be our last chance to lower CO2 levels before something drastic and irreversible happens to the global climate. The wars in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and pray it doesn&#039;t happen, in Iran. Need I mention the Supreme Court? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Vote for Obama, folks! Be disappointed, be angry, hold your nose, and vote for him! At the very least, we will have a politician in charge who is &lt;em&gt;ever so slightly&lt;/em&gt; beholden to us progressives and our interests. Do not give up fighting! But don&#039;t stay home in November!</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/solveiblue/gG5xTY</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/solveiblue/gG5xTY/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:18:22 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/solveiblue/gG5xTY</guid>
            <dc:creator>valkyrie607</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/089ae4c5043d13d8e9_2aebmvj5x.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>valkyrie607</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5xTY/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Barack Obama Beats John McCain On National Security</title>
            <description>McCain and the Republicans can&#039;t win the 2008 election on the economy, so they will try to divert attention to national security. However, the stronger candidate on this vital issue is the one who exercises better judgement. Senator Obama was right in opposing the misplaced war in Iraq, while McCain was wrong to support George Bush&#039;s disastrous invasion. It is important that supporters of Barack Obama tie in judgement as the essential quality for a president who is strong on national security. McCain must not be allowed to control the public definition of national security. Rather, his own record of poor judgement, such as endorsing a 100 year troop commitment to Iraq, must be continually contrasted with the well-conceived and strategic views of Senator Obama on matters concerning the nation&#039;s security.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For updates on the 2008 election, visit the website, http://www.barack-obama-president.com</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barack-obama-president.com/gG5xHq</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barack-obama-president.com/gG5xHq/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:32:04 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/barack-obama-president.com/gG5xHq</guid>
            <dc:creator>Sheldon from New York, NY</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Sheldon from New York, NY</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5xHq/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Question: How do we protect national security AND civil liberties?</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;How can we effectively prevent terrorists from organizing and planning attacks on US interests at home and abroad, but still protect the civil liberties that were trampled on by the Patriot Act, Protect America Act, and the recent FISA revision HR 6304 passed by the US House?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please post your comments, along with any articles, information, or links, in the comment section below.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/benvos/gG5xdh</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/benvos/gG5xdh/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:24:43 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/benvos/gG5xdh</guid>
            <dc:creator>Benjamin Vos, Nashville</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/d1afa2ebd1a178186f_vp0mvyxws.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Benjamin Vos, Nashville</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>44</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5xdh/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>How to Talk Up Obama to Republican Voters</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks go out to Lisa in Buffalo for pointing me to an interesting DailyKos.com blogger, a&amp;nbsp;reformed Republican&amp;nbsp;activist now supporting Senator Obama.&amp;nbsp; He gives a&amp;nbsp;very useful six step instructional on how to talk to your Republican family, friends, and neighbors about why they should vote for Obama come November.&amp;nbsp; For any&amp;nbsp;of us living&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the &amp;quot;Red States,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;these&amp;nbsp;points should be committed to memory.&amp;nbsp; (For a link to the full text,&amp;nbsp;see below the excerpt.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;em&gt;From THEDAILYKOS.COM&#039;s (Press to Digitate&#039;s diary):&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In general, Republican voters dont have the same priorities as Democrats. &lt;em&gt;The reasons YOU support Sen. Obama are most likely NOT the factors on which your Republican associates will make their voting decisions.&lt;/em&gt; Dont assume that your &#039;hot button&#039; issues are necessarily even important to them, nor belittle the priorities they bring to the voting booth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;First,&lt;/strong&gt; to most Republicans, the cornerstone Democratic issues of &amp;quot;Health Care&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Education&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Jobs&amp;quot; just dont even register in the top five issues on which they will base their vote. &amp;nbsp;Arguing that Obama will best handle such subjects wont win their vote &lt;em&gt;even if they believe you that he is best&lt;/em&gt; on these issues. &amp;nbsp;Moreover, Republicans will generally have less confidence in the government to deliver health care, and more confidence in private schools to deliver education than you will. &amp;nbsp; Dont argue these issues, arguments just harden attitudes; save your breath - just dont go there. &lt;strong&gt;You want their actual VOTE&lt;/strong&gt;, not their nodding agreement on some arcane philosophical issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Second,&lt;/strong&gt; resist the urge to &amp;quot;Bush Bash&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;While many (even Most) Republicans are no longer enamored with the President, that doesnt mean they are sympathetic with everyone wanting to dump on him, either. &amp;nbsp;They may feel President Bush to have been well intentioned, though blundering; they may have felt events got out of his control, they may even blame the Democratic Congress for his apparent failings. &amp;nbsp;Again, &lt;strong&gt;DONT GO THERE&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Its not a fight worth having. &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;You dont win VOTES by fighting with people, you win by leading them to the better alternative - from their vantage point, not yours.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;George W. Bush is not on this ballot, and neither is his Vice President running to succeed him. &amp;nbsp;That &amp;quot;Bush Third Term&amp;quot; drivel just wont cut it in winning Republican votes. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, with Obama as our candidate, we can make a better, more substantive case than that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Third,&lt;/strong&gt; the only really serious, pervasively damaging charge the GOP will make against Obama is the tried-and-true tactic of painting him as a traditional &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;tax-and-spend-liberal-democrat, squishy-on-national-defense&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, in the mold of John Kerry, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, etc. To most Republicans, that&#039;s the killer - if they believe it. &amp;nbsp;All other charges and acusations, no matter how scurrilous, are secondary and incidental to that one. &amp;nbsp;If they buy the &#039;tax-and-spend-liberal&#039; label, they&#039;ll believe all the muddier garbage gossip; if they reject that charge as bogus, they&#039;ll most likely reject any other labels that may be pinned on him as &#039;not credible&#039; either. &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;EVEN IF you, in your heart-of-hearts believe we need more taxes and spending&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, and you pray to your humanistic wiccan goddess every night (j/k) that Obama will bring these things, for the sake of the Polar Bears, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;keep those wishes to yourself!!!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &amp;nbsp;To obtain an Obama &lt;strong&gt;VOTE&lt;/strong&gt;, you are appealing to your Republican friend&#039;s existing sensibilities, rather than trying to change them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may not agree with the following policy conclusions which led me to cross over for the first time in my life, and vote for Sen. Obama in Virginia&#039;s open primary, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;but THEY DID&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp;And &lt;em&gt;these same issues will resonate with other Republicans&lt;/em&gt; in voting booths across the country this fall...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;TAXES.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;As a member of the Illinois State Senate, Sen. Obama was cosponsor of a bill which ultimately passed, &lt;em&gt;creating the largest tax cut in state history&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp; Since the start of his presidential campaign, he has consistently favored a broad-based &lt;strong&gt;middle class tax cut&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;nbsp;By contrast, Sen. &lt;em&gt;McCain &amp;quot;voted against tax cuts before he voted for them&amp;quot;, and has no real credibility on this issue among conservatives&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp;McCain was very critical of the Bush tax cuts, which most Republicans believe gave us years of prosperity - until very &amp;nbsp;recently. &amp;nbsp;Obama can thus be taken more seriously than McCain as a President who will cut taxes, rather than raise them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;SPENDING.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;Most Republicans&#039; biggest gripe with their own party - by far - is its failure to control the bureaucracy and reign in runaway federal spending and deficits. &amp;nbsp;It is useful to mention that while the last five (5) Republican Presidents promised fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets, all of them grew discretionary civilian spending by tremendous amounts, and ran up ever larger deficits. &amp;nbsp;Meanwhile, only Pres. Bill Clinton balanced the federal budget, and produced four years of surpluses, with the same forecast long into the indefinite future. A big problem with the federal budget is that almost nobody knows where all the money is going; its easy to add earmarks and pork barrel spending and special interest giveaways when the people back home cant tell the difference. &amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Sen. Barack Obama&#039;s major legislative accomplishment in the Senate,&lt;/strong&gt; the &lt;em&gt;The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;has been to bring transparency to federal spending.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;Send your Republican friends to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.federalspending.gov/&quot;&gt;http://www.federalspending.gov&lt;/a&gt; which his legislation created, a veritable &amp;quot;Google of the Federal Budget&amp;quot;, where anyone can research every dollar to see where their tax money is actually going. &amp;nbsp;The whole Federal Rathole is now online, for the first time ever, inviting scrutiny from whoever has the patience to slog through it all. &amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;You dont have to be a CPA to realize that this does more in the long run to control wasteful federal spending&lt;/em&gt; than all the speeches Bush, Bush, Reagan, Ford, and Nixon ever gave on the subject, put together.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. BIG GOVERNMENT.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;In his North Carolina victory speech, among other things, &lt;em&gt;Sen. Obama uttered the words &lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;We dont need Big Government&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Whether you agree with that or not, remind your Republican friends that Pres. Bill Clinton&#039;s National Performance Review reduced the federal civilian workforce by 250,000 positions (ones they will consider, rightly or wrongly, to be useless tax-sucking bureaucrats). &amp;nbsp;This makes the last Democratic administration the only presidency since Eisenhower&#039;s to leave office with a smaller federal workforce that he started with - again, Bush, Bush, Reagan, Ford, and Nixon notwithstanding. &amp;nbsp;But, the real stones Obama brings to the table on this issue are his formative years on the south side of Chicago, doing meaningful community social &lt;em&gt;work through voluntary, faith-based, non-governmental community organizations, rather than government bureaucracies&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Yes, We CAN - rehabilitate the homeless, educate the illiterate, provide day care for single moms, dry out alcoholics, and clean junkies off the dope without buidling perpetual bureaucracies - Obama himself has proven that, through social entrepreneurship. By contrast, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;John McCain has never drawn a day&#039;s pay that didnt come from the public trough, courtesy of your tax dollars&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (getting fabulously rich by marrying an heiress or taking money under the table from special interests he did favors for doesnt count as &#039;earning money in the productive sector&#039;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. &amp;nbsp;PERSONAL LIBERTY.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;Barry Goldwater must be rolling over in his grave over what debasements of the &lt;strong&gt;U.S. Constitution&lt;/strong&gt; the Bush Administration has gotten itself into, and which the man who took his seat in the U.S. Senate, John McCain now ardently defends. &amp;nbsp;Warrantless domestic wiretapping, warrantless searches and seizures, arresting U.S. citizens without probable cause, holding them without trial, etc., etc....&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No REAL conservative believes these things are legitimate perrogatives of the federal government.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; There are innumerable horror stories you can research and recount of how the GOP has sat idly by while our cherished Constitutional protections have been ignored, abrogated, and turned into a joke. The last thing real conservatives want is the Orwellian Police State we&#039;re presently heading for. &amp;nbsp;Grassroots Republicans dont necessarily trust the feds any more than you do. &amp;nbsp;Thats a case you can make - and make stick - with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5. &amp;nbsp;NATIONAL SECURITY.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;To the rejoinder,&lt;em&gt; &amp;quot;yes, but its worked, we havent been attacked since 9/11&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;, you must add: &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;BUT, we havent foreclosed the threat by taking out al Queada, either&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;nbsp;The National Security argument is like the Tax-and-Spend one, it doesnt matter where you stand on &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;bombing al Queada back to the stone age&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - the fact remains that your Republican friends &lt;em&gt;will vote for the candidate they perceive to be most in tune with that idea, period&lt;/em&gt;. &amp;nbsp;McCain vocally disagrees with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/26/AR2008032603283.html?sid=ST2008032603445&quot;&gt;successful CIA program to take out al Queada leadership when located in northwest Pakistan&lt;/a&gt;, without alerting the local tribal authorities and Pakistani Intelligence, who have always warned off our targets in the past. &amp;nbsp;Sen. Obama, by contrast, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327206,00.html&quot;&gt;opposes giving al Queada sanctuary in Pakistan&lt;/a&gt;, and ardently supports this initiative. &amp;nbsp;When McCain attacked Obama as niave for &amp;quot;wanting to bomb an ally&amp;quot;, the very next day the CIA took out the #3 leader in al Queada with just such a raid, with a missile fired from a Predator drone. &amp;nbsp;Coddling Pakistan&#039;s corrupt dictator for these eight years hasnt made us safer, and &lt;em&gt;John McCain&#039;s simplistic continuation of this weak policy is just being &lt;strong&gt;Soft on Terrorism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, no way around it. Also, its worth noting that whatever other implications it may have for John McCain&#039;s Character, Psyche, or Mental Makeup, having a plane shot out from under you and spending six years behind bars &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;does not automatically qualify anyone as a &amp;quot;national security expert&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;; that notion is just ludicrous on the face of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;6. &amp;nbsp;OPPORTUNITY.&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;While John McCain&#039;s four-star Admiral father ensured him a prized appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, his performance - &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;894th out of 899 cadets in his class&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - does not attest to diligent effort, whereas Barack Obama (from a broken home, on food stamps) won competitive academic scholarships to Harvard, which he proved himself worthy of by graduating &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Magna Cum Laude (&amp;quot;With Highest Honors&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;). &amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Its been a long time since any politicians of either party could talk convincingly about &lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;The American Dream&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;, but Barack Obama can, because he lived it.&lt;/em&gt; &amp;nbsp;Without handouts, family patronage, or inheritence, he pulled himself up by his bootstraps from the Chicago ghetto through his own hard work, enterprise, and initiative to become President of the Harvard Law Review, one of the most prestigious scholarly legal journals in the country. &amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Which President is more likely to make a difference in the lives of people, and motivate them with initiative to best achieve their individual God-given potential?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those are the issues that real, hard-core Republicans think about when they vote for a president. &amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Talk TO them - not past them&lt;/em&gt; with vague, touchy-feely bleeding heart nonsense they wont understand or agree with - and you might very likely ring up another &lt;strong&gt;VOTE&lt;/strong&gt; for Barack Obama this fall. &amp;nbsp;Getting your friends &lt;strong&gt;VOTE&lt;/strong&gt; is all that matters, not winning their hearts to any grander philosophical cause; that just wont happen, so forget it. &amp;nbsp;Make common cause between your GOP acquaintences and Sen. Obama, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;even if its on points you, yourself, disagree with&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THAT&#039;S HOW YOU WILL WIN THIS ELECTION FOR OBAMA. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once you wash that &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;tax-and-spend liberal, squishy-on-national-security&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt; label away, none of the other, lesser acusations the Karl Roves and Rush Limbaughs of this world can make against Obama will stick, either. &amp;nbsp;All other things thus being equal, the younger, more intelligent, more dynamic, less &amp;quot;Washington Establishment&amp;quot;, less &#039;tainted-by-special-interest-money&#039; candidate should prevail. &amp;nbsp;Even among Republicans...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/18/03541/2524&quot;&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/18/03541/2524&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deborahsimmel/gG5xhN</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deborahsimmel/gG5xhN/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:04:33 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/deborahsimmel/gG5xhN</guid>
            <dc:creator>Deborah Simmel</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/72820981b2f16b3d3b_z6m6ibo4o.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Deborah Simmel</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5xhN/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Obama and FISA  bill</title>
            <description>I am very disappointed in Senator Obama caving into the fear that Democrats will look weak if they vote against the FISA bill.  It appears to me that the constitutional rights of the citizens of the USA are being put aside in order to look tough on National Security.  I would appreciate your thoughts and comments.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/catherinesincavage/gG5xhs</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/catherinesincavage/gG5xhs/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/catherinesincavage/gG5xhs</guid>
            <dc:creator>Cathy in Boca</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/d4c1010b8390081940_xucmvyocl.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Cathy in Boca</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>11</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5xhs/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>John McCain&#039;s Character #2</title>
            <description>This weekend, General Wesley Clark went on &amp;quot;Face the Nation&amp;quot; and repeated his opinion that John McCain is untested and lacks the experience to be Commander in Chief. Now, several media outlets are up in arms about Clark&#039;s analysis and are accusing him of &amp;quot;Swift Boating&amp;quot; McCain.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I haven&#039;t seen the &amp;quot;Face the Nation&amp;quot; episode yet (I&#039;ll take a look within a few minutes) but I&#039;ve stayed close to what Wes Clark, VoteVets.org and various other sources have been saying about John McCain and I&#039;ve found them to be entirely credible and trustworthy.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/2cent/gG55QC</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/2cent/gG55QC/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:20:01 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/2cent/gG55QC</guid>
            <dc:creator>BP Cohoon</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/6782d1949bffba0165_4sm6y9g6j.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>BP Cohoon</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG55QC/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Mature way of addressing Extremism in America and abroad</title>
            <description>I have recently written a letter to Senator Obama suggesting a way to address fanaticism or extremism taking roots in Muslims in America. I am a Muslim. I think this will help the Obama campaign show its ability to deal creatively and in a mature and peaceful way with the growing problem of Extremism all around the world. Please read the letter and provide your feedback.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gG55QY</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gG55QY/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sahil/gG55QY</guid>
            <dc:creator>Sahil</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Sahil</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>6</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG55QY/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Barack loses my intensity</title>
            <description>Ah, what a difference a week makes . . . &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; That FISA reversal by Obama was his &amp;quot;Sister Souljah&amp;quot; moment -- but misjudged, using too important an issue, a permanent change affecting compliance with the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, a very expensive way to establish his credentials for &amp;quot;toughness on terrorism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The FISA bill has been delayed, maybe he&#039;ll flip-flop back again with so much public pressure on him from Democrats. But if he continues to fold on FISA all he proves is that he&#039;s running scared, afraid of being called &amp;quot;soft on terror&amp;quot; by right-wing schoolyard bullies who are, in fact, full of huff and bluff. Obama &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; be using his public stature to clue in the American people to this very important fact but instead he&#039;s caving in and saying, in effect, that we should cave in too and be afraid, very afraid. It&#039;s too bad because he&#039;s the only thing we have -- now -- between ourselves and the howling void. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I had been a strong supporter but now I am watching Obama&#039;s character gradually emerge in his flip-flops and smoothly spun little lies, saying &amp;quot;My position has always been...&amp;quot; and then saying what his position was not but is now. Now that HRC is out of the picture and he&#039;s campaigning in GE mode, he&#039;s caving on several progressive fronts and &amp;quot;tacking to the center.&amp;quot; I&#039;m experienced enough to know it&#039;s a political reality for a pol to make vague and optimistic promises in partisan primaries and then tighten up in the general election and after he&#039;s elected. Maybe Barack was always a moderate and never really a &quot;liberal.&quot; In any case, I always thought he was a &lt;b&gt;Constitutionalist&lt;/b&gt; (which is non-partisan) but apparently he&#039;s not. &lt;strong&gt;Outright reversals of position on matters of principle&lt;/strong&gt; are not acceptable to me. This means we have no idea what his principles really are so how do we know how to decide whether he should be president? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; He&#039;s a voting Senator who is making decisions &lt;strong&gt;now&lt;/strong&gt; such as on FISA which affects the Constitution, a decision that will last for generations, not little campaign promises that can be bent and reshaped after he&#039;s elected.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Other senators like Rockefeller have taken tons of financial contributions (akin to outright bribes) from the telecom companies and they have predictably folded on the telecom immunity issue in FISA. But Obama supposedly doesn&#039;t accept telecom contributions, so (if he holds his current &quot;fold&quot; position) he has no excuse to fold on immunity. He promised months ago that he would vote against any bill that contained telco immunity. He has nothing to lose and yet (thus far) he is choosing to accept the FISA bill (not only immunity but expanded powers for the president in the new bill) to pretend that he is &amp;quot;tough on terrorism.&amp;quot; As a sitting Senator and would-be president, there&#039;s nothing more important than the group of Constitutional issues that involve torture, surveillance and wiretap warrants, use of the War Power, posse comitatus and martial law, issues affecting the accountability of the executive branch to the other two branches of government. This is the area of potential Executive Tyranny that Bush and Cheney have worked so hard to establish. Instead of undoing this, Obama is ratifying and fortifying potential Executive Tyranny. The power he is giving the president on FISA is power he is -- in effect -- giving to himself. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Now I can&#039;t think of him without not trusting him. And when he&#039;s president, how can I trust him not to abuse the Fourth Amendment if he has been so high-handed in reversing his principles now? Markos on Daily Kos spoke of the loss of &amp;quot;intensity&amp;quot; in the Obama campaign if Obama caves on FISA. For me, if he sustains his &quot;cave in&quot; in FISA and reverses other core principles, it means that first time in my life as a Democrat (age 64) I will not walk a precinct (for him) or write LTEs/op ed&#039;s (for him). I will not talk him up with my friends. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I don&#039;t know what to say in order to talk him up. I don&#039;t know what his positions are or what they will be tomorrow. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&#039;m not alone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gG55cZ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gG55cZ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:06:35 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/bluejane/gG55cZ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bluejane</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/9b297466e0459223d1_avemv2znf.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bluejane</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG55cZ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>posted to Rachel Maddow&#039;s blog</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I have &lt;a href=&quot;http://airamerica.com/maddow/blog/2008/jun/19/maddow-we-are-winning-iraq-winning-oil-contracts#comment-450645&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Peter&#039;s post to Maddow blog&quot;&gt;posted a reference to my blog entry in Rachel Maddow&#039;s blog comments about the June 19 show&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I had originally concluded, since it was almost impossible to find this speech being mentioned on Google, and that I didn&#039;t know how to find any mention of it on the Obama web site, that there was some reason why Obama wanted to revise his remarks before really releasing them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just discovered that it is easy to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9cGu1aiDks&amp;amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Obama speech on You Tube&quot;&gt;find the speech on You Tube&lt;/a&gt;, which is an extremely public release of the speech. I am now mystified, and could use some instruction from people more experienced in these matters than I.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rdh</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rdh/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:55:52 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rdh</guid>
            <dc:creator>Peter from Silicon Valley</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/e83bae9972c586b0c0_d2kmv2ys8.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Peter from Silicon Valley</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Rdh/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>the story on new Obama speech on national security</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I was so excited when I heard the excerpts from Obama&#039;s new speech on national security on the Rachel Maddow show on Green 960, and so was she, that I created a &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5S5y&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;transcript of Rachel Maddow show on Green 960&quot;&gt;transcript of the portion of her show that covered Obama&#039;s speech, which I posted in my blog&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; As I was wondering how to publicize this as part of my efforts in the blogosphere for Obama, I was struck by the fact that the main Obama web site did not mention this new speech, either as news, or under the issues of Iraq or national security.&amp;nbsp; Finally, I looked at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/2008/06/18/obama-to-meet-with-national-security-advisory-group/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;full story from The Page&quot;&gt;full entry from The Page that eventually contains the link to the transcript of Obama&#039;s remarks&lt;/a&gt;, and I think I have figured out the story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On June 18, Barack Obama, &lt;a href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080618/D91CL6DO0.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Overview of Senior Working Group meeting.&quot;&gt;met with his new Senior Working Group on National Security, made up of experts in international affairs&lt;/a&gt;. At some point, and I am not sure whether it was a talk to his working group or something written immediately afterwards, Obama read the powerful statement that Rachel Maddow covered. How she got the audio tape of the speech I do not know and she has not explained.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/pool-report-of-obamas-meeting-with-national-security-advisers/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;press briefing before meeting of working group&quot;&gt;Mark Halperin of the The Page attended the press briefing of the meeting&lt;/a&gt; and got the transcript of the speech and posted it in his blog.&amp;nbsp; Madeline Albright said that the meeting went well, but does not seem to have been asked more questions about it. Immediately after his meeting with his Senior Working Group on National Security, Obama met with nearly 40 retired admirals and generals to discuss the state of the military and the challenges in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/obama-pool-report-2/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;question and answer session after working group meeting&quot;&gt;Sitting next to Obama for this meeting was retired General Wesley Clark.  He had the task of clearing the room of the press before this meeting&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;  &lt;/p&gt;I have just discovered that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9cGu1aiDks&amp;amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Obama&#039;s wonderful speech on You Tube&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s speech is easy to find on You Tube&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; He gave this speech with the members of his working group standing next to him.&amp;nbsp; I guess I just haven&#039;t found it yet on the Obama web site.&amp;nbsp; I still don&#039;t know why more mention of this isn&#039;t appearing in the news media.&amp;nbsp; The most charitable explanation is that everyone in the news media was overcome by the death of a TV news personality at the same time.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rd9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rd9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:59:30 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5Rd9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Peter from Silicon Valley</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/e83bae9972c586b0c0_d2kmv2ys8.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Peter from Silicon Valley</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Rd9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>TELECOM IMMUNITY MUST NOT BE GRANTED</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Obama supports the FISA compromise bill but says he will work in the Senate to strip a retroactive immunity provision. This is an issue that Obama must put all of his efforts behind - stripping the FISA Bill of the Teelecommunications immunity clause. Failure to do this will be an enormous slap in the face of all Americans who voted to give Democrats a majority in the House and Senate and who are now supporting Obama for President.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the Senate Democrats cave on this legislation and give telecoms retroactive immunity for illegally wiretapping us all, then they will be saying freedom and civil liberties mean very little to them. It will make them no better than the neocon Republicans and could cost them dearly in the fall. In many ways it makes them worse.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is only one thing worse than a corrupt and immoral Republican - that is a spineless Democrat who enables them. No one likes a coward - are you listening Pelosi, Hoyer and Reid???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I cannot stress this enough. The rape of our constitution by the neoconservatives who continually ask us to surrender our freedoms in exchange for our security is destroying what our men in uniform are so valiantly fighting for.&amp;nbsp; If Amerrica does not respect its own constitution anymore, the terrorists have already won. They have made us more like them and less American. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Giving retrocactive immunity to people who willfully violated the law is never a good idea. It encourages more of the same in the future. Barack - this is the most important challenge you have faced to date. DO NOT LET US DOWN!!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/donaldsmetz/gG5SN8</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/donaldsmetz/gG5SN8/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/donaldsmetz/gG5SN8</guid>
            <dc:creator>DONALD S METZ</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>DONALD S METZ</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5SN8/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Rachel Maddow Loves Obama&#039;s new speech on Iraq War</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;On June 18, Barack Obama issued a &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepage.time.com/obama-remarks-on-detainees-and-afghanistan/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Obama Remarks on Detainees and Afghanistan&quot;&gt;new major statement about the Iraq War&lt;/a&gt;. On June 19, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.green960.com/podcast/maddow.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Rachel Maddow 6/19/08 H3 interviews David Bender&quot;&gt;Rachel Maddow covered his statement on Green 960 radio&lt;/a&gt; (select Rachel Maddow 6/19/08 H3 on this page for podcast), including excerpts from his speech.&amp;nbsp; If you listen to the podcast, go to just after the first station break.&amp;nbsp; She covers Obama&#039;s speech and only then goes to her guest, David Bender.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Page, run by Time and CNN, published the transcript of the speech and Mark Halperin is running a poll on whether Obama is more or less honest than McCain.&amp;nbsp; Obama was losing when I cast my vote for Obama. Click on the link above for the transcript to cast your vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are half as excited as I was when I heard this, then please do what you can to get the word out about Barack&#039;s new major statement on the Iraq War, and possibly on Rachel Maddow&#039;s comments on it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is what she said:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am really happy about something happening in electoral politics right now. I&#039;m never happy about anything happening in electoral politics. What I am happy about is the way that Barack Obama is running on national security. I think that Barack Obama may finally be the candidate that the Democrats have needed to banish the liberal wimp myth on national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I consider myself to be a national security liberal. ... I think that liberals actually have the smartest, strongest ideas in terms of our national security about how to keep us safe how to preserve and actually achieve again the role that we want to have in the world. I think that liberals are right and stronger on national security.&amp;nbsp; That&#039;s fundamental to my political ideology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the Democrats and liberals have been caricatured as wimps on national security, and I think that Barack Obama is finally slaying the wimp myth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I hear him talk about national security these days I feel like he is reading my mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check this out:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Let me say a few words about Guantanamo. By any measure, our system of trying detainees has been a failure. Over the course of nearly seven years there has not been a single conviction for a terrorist act at Guantanamo. There has just been one conviction for material support of terrorism. Meanwhile, this legal black hole has substantially set back America&#039;s ability to lead the world against the threat of terrorism and undermined our most basic values.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So make no mistake: we are less safe because of the way George Bush has handled this issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My approach is guided by a simple premise: I have confidence that our system of justice and that our traditions of rule of law are strong enough to deal with terrorists.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator McCain does not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is not the same as suggesting that we should give detainees the full privileges that are afforded American citizens.&lt;br /&gt;I never said that. &lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court never said that. &lt;br /&gt;And I would never do that as President of the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So either Senator McCain&#039;s campaign doesn&#039;t understand what the court decided, or they are distorting my position.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maddow&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: That was Barack Obama speaking on national security yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;I think there are two important things about this.&amp;nbsp; Number one, the McCain campaign is trying to hit Barack Obama on what the Republicans always like to hit Democrats on, which is national security, and to hear&amp;nbsp; Obama pushback quickly and comprehensively like this, just in terms of political machinations, that&#039;s one of the two important things about this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other important thing about this is the substance of what he is saying: putting the Republicans on the defensive on national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At last.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The candidates, Democrats, liberals, and centrists have been waiting for, and it gets better. Listen to this.&amp;nbsp; This is the same speech from a little later on in the speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democrats ought to be memorizing this stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;... in their attempt to distort my position, Senator McCain&#039;s campaign has said I want to pursue a law enforcement approach when it comes to terrorism. This is demonstrably false, since I have laid out a comprehensive counter-terrorism strategy that includes military force, intelligence operations, financial sanctions, and diplomatic action.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the fact that I want to abide by the United States Constitution, they say, shows that I am trapped in a pre-9/11 mind-set.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, I refuse to be lectured on national security by the people who are responsible for the most disastrous set of foreign policy decisions in the recent history of the United States. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other side likes to use 9/11 as a political bludgeon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s talk about 9/11.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The people who were responsible for murdering 3,000 Americans on 9/11 have not been brought to justice. They are Osama Bin-laden, al Qaeda, and their sponsors, the Taliban. They were in Afganistan and yet George Bush with the support of John McCain decided in 2002 that they should take their eye off the ball, off Afghanistan so that we could invade and occupy a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. The case for war in Irag was so thin that George Bush, again with the support of John McCain had to hype up the threat of Saddam Hussein and make false promises that we would be greeted as liberators.&amp;nbsp; They mislead the American people and took us into a misguided war.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And here are the results of their policy:&lt;br /&gt;Osama bin-laden and his top leadership, the people who murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11 have a safe haven in northwest Pakistan, where they operate with such freedom of action that they can still put out hate-filled audio tapes to the outside world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That&#039;s the result of the Bush-McCain approach to the war on terrorism.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Qaeda and Taliban on the run back in 2002. But then we diverted military, intelligence, financial and diplomatic resources to Iraq. And yet Senator McCain has said as recently as this April that: &amp;quot;Afghanistan is not in trouble because of our diversion to Iraq&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I think that just shows a dangerous misjudgement of the facts and a stubborn determination to ignore the need to finish the fight in Afghanistan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our military is badly overstretched as a consequence of Iraq. We have nearly 150,000 troops in Iraq. We may have no more than one or two brigades that can function outside of Iraq as a consequence of our current position. Many of the troops there are on their second, third or fourth tour of duty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile Afghanistan is sliding toward chaos and risks turning into a narco-terrorist state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Taliban is on the offensive in the South. A recent Taliban prison outbreak in Kandahar freed hundreds of militants and underscored the volatile situation on the ground. The coalition&#039;s casualties in Afghanistan last month were actually higher than they were in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the result of the Bush-McCain approach to the war on terrorism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maddow&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: &amp;quot;That&#039;s the result of the Bush-McCain approach to terrorism.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You know, next time somebody tells you that Barack Obama needs to pick somebody to be his Vice-President who will compensate for his weakness - for his weakness, really? - for his weakness on national security, I hereby encourage you to get up on a soapbox of your own making and read this speech at your accuser, because Barack Obama does not have a weakness on national security.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the way he is approaching this is to put the Republicans, rightfully, on the defensive on this issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just one more clip from the speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;I am happy to talk about the choice that we have in this election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can listen to the other side make the same false arguments about why we need to violate our Constitution, not explaiin to the American people what exactly we are doing, stay in Iraq indefinitely, build permanent bases in a country that doesn&#039;t want them, not disclose exactly what&#039;s in the negotiations so we end up learning about them from the Iraqi foreign minister, because our own President doesn&#039;t explain it to the American people, and keep shortchanging our efforts in Afghanistan and our ability to deal with nearly every other national security challenge that we face.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s one option.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or, we can finally end this disastrous approach to national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because the record shows that George Bush and John McCain have been weak on terrorism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Their approach has failed.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because of their policies we are less safe, less respected, less able to lead the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s why I believe it&#039;s time to turn the page.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s time to end the war in Iraq responsibly.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s time to stop wasting time and start putting away terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s time to finally take out al Qaeda&#039;s top leadership and to finish the fight in Afghanistan.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s time to restore our standing in the world so we can once again lead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s why I am running for President of the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maddow&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: That&#039;s why I&#039;m happy that you are running for President of the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the stuff that really, really, really matters to me. I mean a lot of things matter to me, obviously I care about politics for their own sake, but in terms of the issues, on national security and the fact that liberals have been defined as wimps on national security, I am happy that Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for President if for no other reason than because of this speech, because of what he is saying here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You know, ..., with the Republican track record, I&#039;m really happy that someone is running who is willing to tell the Republicans what them politically owning the issue of national security has done to our national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s good news.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s good news.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5S5y</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5S5y/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:59:05 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/PeterInSiliconValley/gG5S5y</guid>
            <dc:creator>Peter from Silicon Valley</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/e83bae9972c586b0c0_d2kmv2ys8.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Peter from Silicon Valley</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5S5y/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Mistakes Were Made. . .</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;According to retired Army Major Gen Antonio Taguba:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the rest of the post &lt;a href=&quot;http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/06/impeach-every-s.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; at Brad DeLong&#039;s Blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5SJd</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5SJd/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:49:33 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5SJd</guid>
            <dc:creator>Robin Lee</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/44508dffd4453a171b_8um6bg2ry.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Robin Lee</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5SJd/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Obama goes cosmopolitan!</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I was glad to see today that Senator Obama is meeting with a national security group.&amp;nbsp; I would love to know what he discusses at the meeting.&amp;nbsp; Of course he may want to keep some ideas secret from the opposition.&amp;nbsp; I&#039;d love to have Obama discuss what couses he took at Columbia in international relations and who his professors were.&amp;nbsp; One of my favorite teachers for Soviet Political Systems and Soviet Foreign policy studied at Columbia and her doctoral advisor was Brzezinski.&amp;nbsp; What foreign leaders does Obama know?&amp;nbsp; What part of the world is most interesting to him?&amp;nbsp; What books has Obama read on foreign affairs?&amp;nbsp; It would be interesting to know more about our candidate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Navarra&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnnavarra/gG5SHX</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnnavarra/gG5SHX/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:30 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnnavarra/gG5SHX</guid>
            <dc:creator>John Navarra</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>John Navarra</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5SHX/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Reason Number 1 Why Barack Obama Has to Win in November</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I really cannot get over how close we came to losing the Constitution last week.&amp;nbsp; In a 5-4 decision I wrote about when it was announced, the Supreme Court upheld the right of military detainees in Guantanamo to seek a Writ of Habeas Corpus.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;rsquo;m not a lawyer, nor a specialist on the US Constitution; I have however paid very close attention to the three Supreme Court cases bearing on Guantanamo prisoners.&amp;nbsp; All three have been stunning and categorical defeats for the Bush administration.&amp;nbsp; In 2004 the court in &lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/U.S.%20citizens%20designated%20as%20enemy%20combatants%20by%20the%20Executive%20Branch%20have%20a%20right%20to%20challenge%20their%20detainment%20under%20the%20Due%20Process%20Clause.&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Hamdi v. Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt; held that U.S. citizens designated as enemy combatants by the Executive Branch have a right to challenge their detainment under the Due Process Clause.&amp;nbsp;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Hamdan v. Rumsfeld&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2006) by a 5-3 majority (Chief Justice Robert recused himself) the court held that the proposed military tribunals against&amp;nbsp;detainees at Guantanamo&amp;nbsp;were unlawful because they were contary to the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice.&amp;nbsp;On this past Thursday in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boumediene_v._Bush&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Boumediene et. al. v. Bush&lt;/a&gt; the court held that Foreign terrorism suspects held at the Guant&amp;aacute;namo U.S. Naval Station in Cuba have constitutional rights to challenge their detention there in United States courts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In this series of decisions the Supreme Court has held that the processes the Bush administration has used to indefinitely detain and&amp;nbsp;try unlawful enemy combatants and terrorism suspects at Guantanamo is contrary to U.S. laws.&amp;nbsp; After Hamdi the Bush administration and its congressional allies&amp;nbsp;tried to retroactively make the detainment process in Guantanamo legal by passing the Detainee Treatment Act (DTA) of 2005. The Hamdan case is interesting because the Republican-controlled congress attempted to make the military tribunals acceptable by passing the&amp;nbsp;Military Commissions Act of&amp;nbsp;2006.&amp;nbsp; In their latest ruling the court held that because the: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;[t]he privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it (U.S. Const., Art I, sec. 9, cl. 2)&amp;rdquo;; [and] it was therefore unnecessary to consider whether the DTA provided an adequate and effective substitute for habeas.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is important because it&amp;nbsp;means that the Supreme Court, citing the Article I of the U.S. Constitution invalidated the Detainee Treatment Act&amp;nbsp;and the methods the Administration is using by holding and trying terrorism suspects and &amp;quot;unlawful combatants&amp;quot; at Guantanamo.&amp;nbsp;Everyone needs to understand that&amp;nbsp;with one more Republican-appointed Justice on their side the case would have gone the other way and by extention the Constitution would be immeasurably diminished in the face of claims of Executive Branch supremacy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank goodness this didn&#039;t happen.&amp;nbsp;But realize&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;of Boumediene&#039;s five-member majority, John Paul Stevens is 88 years old, Ruth Ginsburg is 75 and Anthony Kennedy is 71.&amp;nbsp; The next President will probably appoint two or three Justices.&amp;nbsp; If&amp;nbsp;McCain is President then the next time&amp;nbsp;a case like Boumediene is heard the&amp;nbsp;court will probably produce a 5-4 (of 6-3, or 7-2) decision the other way!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5MKN</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5MKN/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:06:08 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5MKN</guid>
            <dc:creator>Robin Lee</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/44508dffd4453a171b_8um6bg2ry.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Robin Lee</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>4</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5MKN/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Neo-Cons and the New McCarthyism - Terrorist Fist Jabbing and Hate Couture</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Part 1: Michelle Malkin&#039;s Hate Couture&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks to Michelle Malkin&#039;s incredibly ignorant blog post about Rachael Ray&#039;s Dunkin Donuts ad, I&#039;ve gone and bought a cheap&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;keffiyah&lt;/em&gt; in black and white. This checkered scarf, traditionally worn by Palestianians, was identified by Malkin as such: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The keffiyeh, for the clueless, is the traditional scarf of Arab men that has  come to symbolize murderous Palestinian jihad. Popularized by Yasser Arafat and  a regular adornment of Muslim terrorists appearing in beheading and  hostage-taking videos, the apparel has been mainstreamed by both ignorant (and  not so ignorant) fashion designers, celebrities and left-wing icons.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/05/28/rachael_ray,_dunkin_donuts_and_the_keffiyeh_kerfuffle&quot;&gt;Michelle Malkin&#039;s Blog Post&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In truth, Malkin, who feels so clever for coming up with the phrase &lt;em&gt;hate couture&lt;/em&gt;, is the one who is clueless and ignorant. In the Arab world, the keffiyah is as common as a baseball cap. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hgG1XTKCrCiAxCG3ApGEDpJXeFcw&quot;&gt;A better explanation of the meaning of the Keffiyah to the Palestinians&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here in the UK there is a big problem with youth crime, and a large proportion of young boys who are responsible for minor but costly street crime wear Yankee hats. Does this mean that everyone who wears a Yankee hat is a criminal? Even though I&#039;m an Orioles fan, I&#039;m not going to let my bias against the Yankees encourage me to view a yankee hat as a sign of contempt for the law. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, this weekend, I bought a black and white keffiyahs so that I can make a statement of my own. I want to show the world that I support the Palestinian state&#039;s right to exist. Not for the right of people to kill innocent civillians, but for the right of everyday Palestinians to enjoy the same privileges as their Israeli neighbours and to not be restricted by apartheid. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;hate couture&lt;/em&gt;, but &lt;em&gt;love couture! &lt;/em&gt;And if I can make Michelle Malkin angry by wearing it, then that in itself is a good excuse! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I can get one person to open their mind to the idea that not all Palestinians are terrorists, then I&#039;ll be very pleased with myself. If that means taking it to Rehoboth Beach in Delaware when I go back over the pond for my family&#039;s annual beach week, then so be it! I&#039;m going to wear it as a cover-up and use it as a source for dialogue because there isn&#039;t any on this subject in the US. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Part 2: Terrorist Fist-Jabbing and the New McCarthyism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I came across the story about E.D. Hill&#039;s description of the Michelle-Barack fist-jab as a &#039;terrroist&#039; gesture and was writing to her email address to express my disgust when I learned that her show had been cancelled by Fox News. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you are unaware of the story, E.D. Hill appears to be a Fox News Bush Bimbo who, in a flash of brilliant understanding of modern popular culture normally reserved to people over 50, basically stated on her show, and I paraphrase, that the fist jab may have been a secret handshake for members of a terrorist organization.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m glad that Fox finally did something responsible in cancelling her show, although this is only because they have decided to take a subtle approach to their mission to discredit Obama. After all, it&#039;s not like they fired her. She&#039;ll probably get the show back after the election is over.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This really does demonstrate how ridiculously ignorant and stupid Fox News reporters can be. The BBC would never hire someone like that, because they hire people according to their professional ability and not their political beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dan Sweeney wrote a great &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-sweeney/scarves-daps-and-other-su_b_106266.html&quot;&gt;blog entry&lt;/a&gt; in the Huffington Post regarding these two events as part of a wider effort by Fox News and the Neo-Con movement to identify anything that is ideologically opposed to their view of foreign policy is a terrorist. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are some of Sweeney&#039;s &#039;You might be a terrorist IF&#039; jokes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2) If you plan on voting for fist-pounding terrorist sympathizer Barack Obama, you might be a terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3) If you live in San Francisco, you might be a terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4) If you think that even Michelle Malkin could find better things to do with her time than examine the fashion choices of Rachael Ray, you might be a terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5) If you think that Fox News&#039; reporting of a fist pound as a terrorist fist jab makes them look shockingly, eye-poppingly, searingly stupid as opposed to making Barack Obama look like a terrorist, you might be a terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6) If you went out and bought one of those scarves the minute Dunkin Donuts pulled the ad, you might be a terrorist. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-sweeney/scarves-daps-and-other-su_b_106266.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I&#039;m not the first person to note the similarities between the political exploitation of the public&#039;s fear of terrorist attacks and the McCarthy movement in the 1950s. After all, the Republicans exploited McCarthy and the public&#039;s fear of the unknown &#039;other&#039; (in this case, the communists) in the same way that they are now exploiting the public&#039;s fear of another 9/11. All of McCarthy&#039;s information about communist sympathizers came from high-ranking FBI officials who wanted the Republicans to win the next presidential election. As soon as the Republicans won the election, the party didn&#039;t need McCarthy anymore and allowed him to be swept away into disgrace when the public tired of him and he became more dramatic and paranoid in his speeches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I think that there is a difference here, and an important one. I think that the Republicans are going to play this card on national security for a long time, at least until the war on terror is over, which is something that I don&#039;t forsee happening for a very long time. That is to say, if it ever does happen.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/expat/gG5GMh</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/expat/gG5GMh/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/expat/gG5GMh</guid>
            <dc:creator>Brittany Shenanigans</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/7b04ae5036ac9a6d86_ss7lmvory.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Brittany Shenanigans</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5GMh/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Why Senator Obama is good for business both large and small and good for “We The People”.</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;There are several so called economic opinions circulating that purport to speak of how Senator Obama will be bad for business, small and big.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Senator McCain (a lifetime member of the Keating 5 Club) and his economic advisors, attempt to explain how they like President Bush are the real Stewards of the American Economy.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;One point I think we can all agree on is that for the last almost 8 years President Bush and Cheney have been the real Stewards of the economic well-being of some of the very largest American companies but not the American people and small business owners.&amp;nbsp; While certain companies that have close ties with the President and Vice President have done extremely well in economic terms, the vast majority of small business, regular working people and the less well off have slipped deeper into an economic quagmire.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;As all first year economics student will tell you it is the small and medium sized businesses that are the major driving force behind job creation in the US.&amp;nbsp; It is also consumer spending that is the real driver of the US economy.&amp;nbsp; If both of these groups pull back in their spend and their perception of how good the economy is doing then the US experiences a recession as we are now witnessing.&lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;America need a visionary leader as Senator Obama to set the tone so we can all come together and do what Americans do best -&amp;nbsp; work on solutions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Over the last 8 years we have watched the national debt increase to almost $9.5 trillion dollars or an average of $1.58 billion dollars a day since September 28, 2007. &amp;nbsp;Does anyone remember that the last Democrat to occupy the White House was on target to move America totally out of debt within a few months of leaving office.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;And when we add in the sub-prime loan meltdown we get a real sense of how totally unable the Republicans continue to be at managing finances.&amp;nbsp; President Regan oversaw the Savings &amp;amp; Loan mess with the assistance of Senator McCain.&amp;nbsp; Now another Republican President, G.W. Bush again with the assistance of Senator McCain has managed the seemingly impossible task of increasing the National Debt, allow the Sub-Prime Loan meltdown and begin a pre-emptive &amp;ldquo;100 Year&amp;rdquo; war in Iraq for reasons that were knowingly false.&amp;nbsp; Are these the solutions we in America need or are looking to define the values &amp;ldquo;We The People&amp;rdquo; embrace? &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Senator Obama encourages all of us to offer our solutions and policy ideas to return America back to the real America.&amp;nbsp; The Republicans and Senator McCain do not encourage this type of participation because all the policy has already been written going back to the Savings &amp;amp; Loan mess of the 1980&amp;rsquo;s.&amp;nbsp; And since these policies &amp;ldquo;messes&amp;rdquo; were supervised by Senator McCain there is no need to really ask where he stands from a policy standpoint.&amp;nbsp; We see their failed policy &amp;ldquo;solutions&amp;rdquo; all around us today.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;We small business owners and veterans need a visionary who can articulate the ideas and solutions &amp;ldquo;We The People&amp;rdquo; suggest to him.&amp;nbsp; We need to say come November - Yes we can President Obama, together we can work to rebuild a more generous America from a position of strength and safety; not 100 year wars, budget deficits and financial &amp;ldquo;messes&amp;rdquo;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Together we Americans can rebuild as we have done in the past.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;Senator Obama, WE ARE READY! NOW! Help us lead our great country.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billquam/gG5GxF</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billquam/gG5GxF/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:05:24 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billquam/gG5GxF</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/f36f9c9b56466c06af_teymv24f7.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bill</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5GxF/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Obama Stuns With Veep Choice</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;He picks Retired Four Star Admiral William &amp;quot;Fox&amp;quot; Falon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Admirial may be able to teach McCain a thing or two about National Security, in general, and Iraq/Iran, in particular.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;A brilliant move,&amp;quot; say blogger Fredrick Bernanke&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MyBlog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://proteanperspectives.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;http://ProteanPerspectives.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fredrickbernanke/gG5jJ4</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fredrickbernanke/gG5jJ4/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:10:30 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/fredrickbernanke/gG5jJ4</guid>
            <dc:creator>Fredrick Bernanke</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/ed10ce223769234a7d_9d7mv2yo7.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Fredrick Bernanke</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5jJ4/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>We Can&#039;t Let These People Back in Polite Society</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/09/countdown-redux-richard-clarke-on-bush-administration-%e2%80%9cwe-cant-let-these-people-back-into-polite-society%e2%80%9d/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Crooks and Liars&lt;/a&gt; has video of Richard Clark making a very important point. After all these people in the Bush administration have done over the past eight years we cannot just let them move back into their sinecures on Corporate Boards and University Faculties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Clarke: &amp;ldquo;Well, there may be some other kind of remedy. There may be some sort of truth and reconciliation commission process that&amp;rsquo;s been tried in other countries, South Africa, Salvador and what not, where if you come forward and admit that you were in error or admit that you lied, admit that you did something, then you&amp;rsquo;re forgiven. Otherwise, you are censured in some way.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Now, &lt;strong&gt;I just don&amp;rsquo;t think we can let these people back into polite society and give them jobs on university boards and corporate boards and just let them pretend that nothing ever happened when there are 4,000 Americans dead and 25,000 Americans grievously wounded&lt;/strong&gt;, and they&amp;rsquo;ll carry those wounds and suffer all the rest of their lives.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;We know that impeaching these folks is increasingly unlikely, as is rendition to The Hague. But what about keeping these people unemployed for the rest of their lives? I think it the least we can do to ensure that these people&amp;nbsp;suffer economic sanctions at least until they&amp;nbsp;demonstrate genuine remorse and repentance for what they have done in office. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;This is how it would work; an organization announces that Dick Cheney is going to give a speech for $25,000. That body and its sponsors are targeted with an economic boycott unless they withdraw the offer. A university is going to hire Alberto Gonzales; alumni announce that they will stop donating money. This can work and is just punishment to these people who have wrought so much harm.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5VtT</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5VtT/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:42:59 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/robinfarley/gG5VtT</guid>
            <dc:creator>Robin Lee</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/44508dffd4453a171b_8um6bg2ry.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Robin Lee</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5VtT/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>New McCain ad - war and national security</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Sen. &lt;strong&gt;John McCain &lt;/strong&gt;again is raising the issue of war and national security in a new ad.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;In the 30-second spot, airing Friday through next week in 10 swing states, the Republican presidential candidate talks matter-of-factly about the damage war has brought to himself and his family while simultaneously showing dark images of his father, grandfather, himself and the long black marble wall of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington. &amp;ldquo;Only a fool or fraud talks tough or romantically about war,&amp;rdquo; says McCain, half in shadow. It ends with McCain saying, &amp;ldquo;I hate war, and I know how terrible its costs are.&lt;strong&gt; I&amp;rsquo;m running for president to keep the country I love safe.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The McCain campaign sees national security as one of its key strengths and is working to paint Sen. &lt;strong&gt;Barack Obama &lt;/strong&gt;as too inexperienced to be commander in chief. He is also trying to overcome the fact he is a big supporter of the war in Iraq, which remains deeply unpopular with the public.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;McCain&amp;rsquo;s focus on his own background shows that he thinks his biography works to his advantage. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The ad buy is substantial and spread across Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, according to a Democratic source.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/strong&gt; Democratic officials said the ad buy totaled $3.1millon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the ad &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1OUxBvlLr0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;UHHHH...John.... making us safe? Not McSame.&amp;nbsp; See my ealier post on &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5Chc&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;National Security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5BPG</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5BPG/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:25:04 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5BPG</guid>
            <dc:creator>Inspired in Florida - a Recovering Republican</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/653150c4815b9d289b_rh9mv2gz5.gif</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Inspired in Florida - a Recovering Republican</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5BPG/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>National Security - Are We Safer Now?</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;American taxpayers expect the federal government to provide national security. Achieving that security is a constant and complicated challenge that cannot be met by military might alone. A sound national security policy involves three broad strategies:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Preventive measures such as securing nuclear materials abroad and participating in multi-lateral diplomatic and peacekeeping operations;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Homeland security such as providing port security and coordinating emergency first responders; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The military&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;Currently, federal spending on these three strategies is heavily weighted toward military operations. In fiscal year 2005, as shown in the graph, almost nine dollars was spent on the military for every dollar spent on all other non-military security tools combined.&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://s80.photobucket.com/albums/j174/MoonChat2/?action=view&amp;amp;current=safer.gif&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j174/MoonChat2/safer.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Photobucket&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you consider the DoD has the WORST RECORD when it comes to fraud and abuse, and combining that with potential adversaries outside he Muslim world, namely China and Russia, that have begun to organize themselves against perceived U.S. egemony and its desire for aintaining global economic and military dominance,&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; I SURE DON&#039;T FEEL SAFER!!!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5Chc</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5Chc/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:36:51 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stopthepropaganda/gG5Chc</guid>
            <dc:creator>Inspired in Florida - a Recovering Republican</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/653150c4815b9d289b_rh9mv2gz5.gif</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Inspired in Florida - a Recovering Republican</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Chc/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Time to cool it on Clinton</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I realize everyone&#039;s on an adrenaline high about clinching the nomination, but it&#039;s time to relax on the Clinton hate. Yes, she said some pretty stupid things, some of which are going to come back at us in the general, but screaming at the top of our lungs that she needs to concede isn&#039;t going to help. It makes us look like sore winners. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sethkramer/gG5Cks</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sethkramer/gG5Cks/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:25:45 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/sethkramer/gG5Cks</guid>
            <dc:creator>Seth Kramer</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/56287f4b54d53c4eef_ofpmv2o43.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Seth Kramer</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>12</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gG5Cks/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>We can trust John McCain</title>
            <description>John McCain has a long record of commentary on Iraq. This stretches back to 2001.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/larryconley/gGB7Qm</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/larryconley/gGB7Qm/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:15:41 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/larryconley/gGB7Qm</guid>
            <dc:creator>Valeroso2008</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/74f1ef2129c3254f9e_ga8mvysf6.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Valeroso2008</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGB7Qm/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Why not pay them more?</title>
            <description>As a member of the United States Armed Forces stationed overseas, I am sick and tired of being used a sound bite by the current administration and then thrown under the bus!&amp;nbsp; I want someone in charge who cares about us and what we do.&amp;nbsp; The current administration recently proposed a 3.5% pay increase for the Military.&amp;nbsp; Congress increased that amount by .4% to a total of 3.9% to help close the gap between the annual pay that our military gets and the annual pay of a comparable private sector job.&amp;nbsp; (&lt;em&gt;According to Rep. Susan Davis D-Calif, chairwoman of the House Armed Services military personnel subcommittee, this pay gap currently stands at 3.4% to 2.9% less pay for members of the military.&lt;/em&gt;)&amp;nbsp; The current administration is fighting that .4% pay increase at the same time they are asking for back to back tours of duty in Afghanistan and Iraq!&amp;nbsp; If you are asking some one to put in more time at work in the private sector, you pay them more.&amp;nbsp; Why would they not be willing to do the same for the members of the Armed Forces who risk their lives defending this great country?&amp;nbsp;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/joshuakeller/gGCM3t</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/joshuakeller/gGCM3t/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:35:11 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/joshuakeller/gGCM3t</guid>
            <dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Joshua</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGCM3t/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Dear Senator Obama</title>
            <description>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have been listening to the TV talking heads about how Republicans play this notion of National Security and have for the past two decades or so, trounced Democrats with their idea of this very real issue.&amp;nbsp; Of course, national security to them is scaring you about gay marriage, outlawing abortion, refusing equal pay to women and minorities, putting your social security into an extremely volatile market, preventing minorities, elderly and disabled Americans from voting&amp;nbsp; (illegally), crippling the 1st, 4th &amp;amp; 6th Amendments of our Constitution, absolutely no accountability in government, war profiteering, no-bid contracts for companies that are hurting our soldiers- there is obviously more and more important than my humble words can describe, but, there is absolutely no reason to believe that Republicans can triumph on their idea of National Security any longer.  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I want to hear voters being asked by Barack Obama if they truly think that Republicans have done everything in their power to make us and our great country safer!&amp;nbsp; Republicans have played on, what I call Apple Pie Issues (I call them Apple Pie issues because of the saying, &amp;quot;As American as apple pie&amp;quot;, not in some simplistic or condescending attitude); how their candidate makes them feel at the end of a long, hard working day.&amp;nbsp; Do they feel better after Bush and the NeoCon-artists have played on their fears and vulnerabilities to prop themselves up?&amp;nbsp; Do they realize that these Republicans have been shredding our freedoms and civil liberties while telling us that we needn&#039;t worry about that, that which our Country was founded on, that which millions have lost their lives defending and that which we continue to fight for today- is suddenly not something we should be worrying about? &amp;nbsp; Whenever I hear anyone intimate in any way, shape or form that people who disagree with the president&#039;s ideas or policies, people who are &#039;dissenters&#039; are somehow either traitors or hate America or some other ridiculous nonsense, I want to sit them down for a proper history lesson (although throwing my TV across the room would not help, the idea sometimes makes me feel better).&amp;nbsp; I had more than a few great, and I mean truly great, history teachers, but there are two, particularly in high school, that really showed me what was not just great, not just revolutionary, but the true and unique beauty of our almost perfect union.&amp;nbsp; Each taught me that those who do not learn or learn from history, are condemned to repeat it.&amp;nbsp; Each teacher taught me that a patriot can be proud of their country when it is right AND critical when we are in the wrong.&amp;nbsp; That dissent is the essence of true patriotism.&amp;nbsp; It takes education, critical thinking and great courage to stand up and say when things are wrong, it takes even greater courage when politicians want to label you as weak or traitorous for doing just that. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We have seen what has happened to those that love their country so much, they have stood up and said what is right, regardless of the consequences only to be insulted, accused of not being a patriot, belittled or marginalized; and that is truly un-American.&amp;nbsp; It is patriotism and true love of this country that is responsible for it&#039;s foundation, and it&#039;s near perfection written into the laws, that gives the people, not an elected or an appointed politician, the responsibility to right the wrongs and always act in the remarkable traditions of this Great Nation.&amp;nbsp; It was the public show of McCarthyism that reminded us that we are a free people.&amp;nbsp; It was standing up to guilt by association tactics and the assault on our right to believe and be free that toppled and finished McCarthyism and turned it into an unlawful practice and a great embarrassment of this Nation.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;It is now evident that the present Administration has fully embraced, for political advantage, McCarthyism. I am not referring to the Senator from Wisconsin. He is only important in that his name has taken on the dictionary meaning of the word. It is the corruption of truth, the abandonment of the due process law. It is the use of the big lie and the unfounded accusation against any citizen in the name of Americanism or security. It is the rise to power of the demagogue who lives on untruth; it is the spreading of fear and the destruction of faith in every level of society&amp;rdquo; (President Harry Truman)&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;ldquo;We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men.&amp;rdquo; (Edward R. Murrow) &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It will again take great courage to stand up to the newest attempt of McCarthyism in our present society.&amp;nbsp; The accusations of being labeled a terrorist because we dissent, organize and try to right the wrongs our government has perpetrated in our country&#039;s Great Name and Traditions are intimidating, but History has taught us that it is not only our right, but our responsibility to stand up for what is truly America.&amp;nbsp; Peaceful Anti-War groups are being labeled terrorists and are being spied on by our own government and people are being randomly searched (Al Gore, 80-year old women, Al Sharpton, etc) in the name of terrorism.&amp;nbsp; The boogeyman of terrorism, is quite real, but you can&#039;t kill an idea with a bullet, nor change an ideology with a conventional war.&amp;nbsp; You also can&#039;t stop terrorism with fear mongering.&amp;nbsp; Terrorism is a tactic, and fear is the exploited vulnerability to achieve the desired result.&amp;nbsp; Living in fear makes you paranoid, not safe.&amp;nbsp; Being cautious and thorough makes you safe, not paranoid and reactionary.&amp;nbsp; Understanding the enemy and their hatred makes you a formidable opponent, not weak, not a terrorist sympathizer, not an America-hater and certainly not an enemy. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It seems that with the ratings-driven news cycles and bumper sticker size talking points, these all too important concepts have been forgotten.&amp;nbsp; It is ill-advised to allow these concepts to go the way of the Dodo.&amp;nbsp; We are Americans, we are a proud people and we should NEVER be shamed into agreeing with or believing in, something that we know is wrong out of fear.&amp;nbsp; We used to be a great nation, we will be again, but it will take great courage, no less than this Great Country of ours deserves.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This is America.&amp;nbsp; It was Joseph Welch who famously asked of McCarthy, &amp;ldquo;Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Shall we wait for the next Joseph Welch, or do we have it in us all to stand up together, without fear, as a Nation, this Great Nation and right the wrongs again?&amp;nbsp; I believe we do, we can.&lt;/p&gt;  &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So the next time you hear anyone questioning someone&#039;s patriotism, whether they are a presidential candidate, a famous celebrity or your next door neighbor; remember, this Nation was founded on dissent from King George and treason against the Crown of England- does America deserve any less now?&amp;nbsp; Do you? &amp;nbsp;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/Cbears8586/gGCMjg</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/Cbears8586/gGCMjg/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:19:53 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/Cbears8586/gGCMjg</guid>
            <dc:creator>Cbears8586</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Cbears8586</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGCMjg/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Room for Negotiation:  Sanctions and economic aid</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/?emc=na&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/?emc=na&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; The New York Times reports civil war in Lebanon is complicated by Palestian terrorists migrating to the refugee camps within Lebonese borders.&amp;nbsp; This volital area has been invaded by both Syria and Israel.&amp;nbsp; United States marines were killed there prompting closure of the U.S. embassy in years past.&amp;nbsp; The war is fanned by aid to Hammas from Iran.&amp;nbsp; Could the situation get any worse?&amp;nbsp; Maybe it could.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If peace between warring factions is not brokered through negotiation, the multi-faceted violence could continue for decades more.&amp;nbsp; Reminiscent of the civil war in Iraq, each side considers the other to be &amp;quot;terrorists.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Perhaps the only definition of the word could be any outside force, any group not part of the official government could be considered a terrorist organization.&amp;nbsp; Suicide bombings are part and parcel of terrorist activity.&amp;nbsp; Without tanks and and sophisticated weapons, people become weapons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The conflagration threatens the stability of the entire Middle East, and so the world&#039;s oil supply.&amp;nbsp; Were these civil wars located in Africa, the United States would do nothing to staunch the bleeding.&amp;nbsp; The masacres in Rowanda serve as evidence of our selective participation in &amp;quot;peace keeping.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; It is unlikely military intervention by the U.S. would do anything but fan the flames.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barack Obama&#039;s intention to talk to the leaders of rogue nations promises to be the only glimmer of hope in the darkness of confusion in that region.&amp;nbsp; Naive? Or practical?&amp;nbsp; The much maligned administratiion of Jimmy Carter managed to effect the Camp David Peace Accords.&amp;nbsp; Only his failure to solve the hostage situation blighted his administration and labeled him as a&amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; president.&amp;nbsp; We need to have the bravery to intercede diplomaticaly.&amp;nbsp; That goal cannot, in thoughtful minds, be interpreted as &amp;quot;appeasement.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The administration&#039;s determination to &amp;quot;win&amp;quot; the war in Iraq and the McCain assertion the war will be resolved by &amp;quot;defeating&amp;quot; the terrorists with almost&amp;nbsp;five more of war (a &amp;quot;crystal ball vision&amp;quot;) is not based on any kind of new plan.&amp;nbsp; We will be paying with American lives and the real threat to this country continued spending on the war will effect.&amp;nbsp; We cannot weaken our&amp;nbsp;national security&amp;nbsp;by beating the enemy and ourselves with the same club.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I keep writing about the McCain-Bush myopic failed foreign policy, but it&#039;s only because this is such an important issue in this election.&amp;nbsp; We are at a cross road where we have to choose a road to peace through the use of &amp;quot;carrots and sticks,&amp;quot; or create the real possibility of another world war.&amp;nbsp; The U.S., India, and China are oil thirsty nations who have a vested interest in securing the world&#039;s largest oil reserves.&amp;nbsp; At this time, oil is key to our national security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We cannot risk our vital interest or trust it to military tactics.&amp;nbsp; We have already tried that and all we have done is alienate the largest portion of the Iraqi population and damage our position as the economic power of the free world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In two independent polls, 60% of Iraqis said they wanted the United States to withdraw their occupation (a fact not widely reported by the press).&amp;nbsp; We learned in Viet Nam we cannot &amp;quot;win&amp;quot; a civil war.&amp;nbsp; Just as the North Vietnamese were armed by China, insurgent forces in Iraq are armed by the Iranians.&amp;nbsp; Alqaeda has it&#039;s eye on Palestine.&amp;nbsp; We may not be able to talk to the Bin Laudin terrorists from Afghanistan, but relations can be established with Iran as we established relations with China.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the cold war years, the United States maintained a balance of power in the Middle East by supplying both sides with military aid.&amp;nbsp; It would not serve us well to repeat such a policy, but relative peace was secured with the understanding that all sides were self-interested enough not to wage war with a nation similarly equipped with weapons from the United States.&amp;nbsp; When Russia stated supplying arms, we bolstered aid to the other side.&amp;nbsp; It became an escalating arms race.&amp;nbsp; We have seen what military solutions do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McCain&#039;s &amp;quot;joke&amp;quot; about bombing Iran provoked an international incident.&amp;nbsp; He told critics to &amp;quot;get a life.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; We need a president who can be presidential.&amp;nbsp; We need Obama in the White House.&amp;nbsp; We need his good judgement and fresh outlook on securing a lasting solution to the Middle East problem.&amp;nbsp; I do not expect everything will be solved by pulling out of Iraq.&amp;nbsp; But, Obama intends to secure the Iraqi borders by using sanctions and economic aid as diplomatic tools to accomplish our objectives.&amp;nbsp; It is the only sane course to pursue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBDlH</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBDlH/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:28:05 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBDlH</guid>
            <dc:creator>smffy</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>smffy</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBDlH/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Addiction to Oil Kills</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Now that the republicans have admitted the war in Iraq is about oil, we can talk about the catastrophy we will face if we do not become independent of foreign oil.&amp;nbsp; More than 4,000 of our military have been killed on foreign soil, many more wounded and disabled.&amp;nbsp; The cost of caring for surviving veterans will mount into trillions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;China is becoming an increasingly oil thirsty nation.&amp;nbsp; Russia has tightened up on it&#039;s oil exports.&amp;nbsp; How easy it is for me to imagine a global war over the dwindling oil reserves.&amp;nbsp; The best energy policy the country has seen up to this point was created during the Nixon administration and subsequently abandoned as oil shortages ended the gas lines of the &#039;70&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now Bush is having tea with the Saudis trying to convince them to increase their oil production.&amp;nbsp; They are refusing.&amp;nbsp; It is in the interest of the oil companies and not the country&#039;s interest we have engaged in a wrongful war.&amp;nbsp; It&#039;s time for us to see the iron ties between national security and oil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama has an abitious energy policy that will strengthen our country&#039;s independence and bolster our security. There is no language strong enough to argue the case for alternative fuel and withdrawal from Iraq.&amp;nbsp; How many more will die there and possibly on other fronts if the oil, oil, oil policies of the Bush administration are continued?&amp;nbsp; We need not suppose this is &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; an environmental issue.&amp;nbsp; We cannot afford to pay for this war, let alone an inevitable other war if we do not face up to the fact that oil kills.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBfm4</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBfm4/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:37:24 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/susanfowler/gGBfm4</guid>
            <dc:creator>smffy</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>smffy</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBfm4/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Barack and Freedom of Information</title>
            <description>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; President Bush and his extravagant misuse of the Presidential Executive Order have whittled the Freedom of Information Act from the beam of sunshine for Democracy, to a splinter of light unseen by the human eye.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; During his term in office, George Bush has used the privilege of &amp;ldquo;Executive Order&amp;rdquo; to cripple the Freedom of Information Act and the Presidential Records Act.&amp;nbsp; George Bush has redefined &amp;ldquo;National Security&amp;rdquo; to include &amp;lsquo;sensitive&amp;rsquo; information (having nothing to do with National Security) and absurdly reclassified previously unclassified documents.&amp;nbsp; All to avoid that dirty word, &amp;ldquo;responsibility&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Stephen Aftergood, (Project on Government Secrecy: Federation of American Scientists) states that, &amp;ldquo;Information is the oxygen of Democracy, lately Democracy is gasping for air.&amp;nbsp; Where the policy had been, information should be released unless there were foreseeable harm from its disclosure.&amp;nbsp; It was changed under attorney General Ashcroft to say, that information should be withheld whenever there was a sound legal basis for doing so.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Government accountability, in the form of Open Government, is not included in those poll and survey choices as to the most important issues to the people of this country.&amp;nbsp; It should be, as it is at the top of most everyone&amp;rsquo;s list.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Polls and surveys, pertaining to Open Government, show that a very high and growing majority of the citizens of these United States believe that the government works from behind closed doors.&amp;nbsp; That our political system runs in a mode of secrecy and the privacy of more and more citizens is being usurped by illegal government tapping of phones, emails, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The numbers in these polls need not be mentioned, as the question is, &amp;ldquo;What do you think?&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Do you think that your government, Local, State and/or National is being run from behind closed doors without your input or notification of pending legislations and decisions?&amp;nbsp; Chances are, as with the majority of &amp;ldquo;We the people&amp;rdquo;, you have lost much trust in your government, and feel helpless to do anything.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Voting has for too long been called a &amp;ldquo;lesser of evils&amp;rdquo; situation.&amp;nbsp; Politicians have, for too long, evaded responsibility to the peoples whom they were elected to represent.&amp;nbsp; Open Government, often-called &amp;lsquo;transparency&amp;rsquo; of government, is long overdue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; John McCain&amp;rsquo;s proposals for transparency in government are so vague they are like tinted car windows, someone can see out but nobody can see inside.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hillary Clinton has a 10-point Open Government proposal on her website.&amp;nbsp; Not so convincing as it is something that addresses the issue that people can see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Barack Obama has this here and this there but no easily accessible information directly addressing an Open Government policy.&amp;nbsp; His policies are the best, his history evidences his intent on making government accessible to the people, he, however, has no consolidation of this information as an &amp;ldquo;issue&amp;rdquo;.&amp;nbsp; Moreover, when finally it emerges, the Open Government Issue will be a major player in the Presidential election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We see polls here and polls there, what issues are most important to the people.&amp;nbsp; However, these polls and surveys do not list &amp;ldquo;Open Government&amp;rdquo;; they list &amp;ldquo;economy&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;foreign policy&amp;rdquo;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I hope that somehow the message gets to Barack that it is in his best interest to address Government Transparency (including the Presidential Records Act) which IS covered all over his statements and policy proposals.&amp;nbsp; Nevertheless, these things need to stay where they are located but also condensed into one statement of issue, under &amp;ldquo;Issues&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Loveya,&lt;br /&gt;Duane Kuehn</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/duane/gGBdnv</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/duane/gGBdnv/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:09:59 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/duane/gGBdnv</guid>
            <dc:creator>Duane Kuehn</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Duane Kuehn</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBdnv/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Our Auto Industry, Fuel Economy, Emissions, Oil Imports, and  Employment</title>
            <description>&lt;strong&gt;Here are &lt;u&gt;some&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;u&gt; &lt;/u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;of&amp;nbsp;the real facts&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;p&gt;As adults, Detroit3 corporate management hopefully understood (&lt;strong&gt;and STILL understands&lt;/strong&gt;) the&lt;strong&gt; intent of CAFE&lt;/strong&gt; that STARTED with the oil embargos of the 1970s ... AND ... CONTINUES WITH the EVEN MORE URGENT NATIONAL NEED ... today. Sadly, their domestic performance does NOT REFLECT THAT UNDERSTANDING.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They, the Det3, have demonstrated their capability to develop and provide radically higher fuel economy (AND lower emissions) in Europe (EU) since 1998!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 2008 US vehicles&amp;nbsp;rated *** &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;25 mpg combined average &lt;u&gt;and more&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; *** compared to their European offerings:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;** US Chrysler = 4 vehicles (with &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;best&amp;quot; @ 26 mpg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;) [Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep]&lt;br /&gt;#&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; EU Chrysler = 7 vehicle&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;configurations&lt;/strong&gt; rated &lt;strong&gt;~32 to ~40 mpg(US) combined cycle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;** US Ford = 5 vehicles (with &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;2 &amp;quot;bests&amp;quot; @ 32 mpg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;) [Ford and Mercury]&lt;br /&gt;#&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; EU Ford = 22 vehicle&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;configurations&lt;/strong&gt; rated &lt;strong&gt;~42 to ~58 mpg(US) combined cycle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;** US GM = 24 vehicles (with &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;best&amp;quot; @ 29 mpg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;) [Buick, Cadillac, Chevy, GMC, Pontiac, Saturn]&lt;br /&gt;#&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;EU GM/Opel/Vauxhall = 50 vehicle configurations&lt;/strong&gt; rated &lt;strong&gt;~42 to ~53 mpg(US) combined cycle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008bymanuf.jsp?year=2008&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008bymanuf.jsp?year=2008&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/search/&quot;&gt;http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/search/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt; vehicles from the Detroit3 in the US rated &lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;above 33 mpg(US) combined average&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PLEASE explain how Chrysler, Ford, AND/OR GM meets either the intent OR the spirit of the &lt;strong&gt;2008 CAFE objective of 27 mpg plus&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The US versus EU offerings clearly demonstrates that the US consumer could easily reduced (by choice) their fuel consumption by more than 50% to 60% by a different choice of vehicle ... &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;IF ... &amp;nbsp;it were available to CHOOSE!&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That choice, alone, COULD put &lt;strong&gt;several $ thousands&lt;/strong&gt; in current fuel cost &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;back into the consumer pockets per year &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;for other domestic goods and services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;With wide enough acceptance, oil imports could approach ZERO (0) within 10 years. That would be about $0.8 TRILLION per year savings in unnecessary fuel consumption &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;($0.6 TRILLION per year just for imported oil)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; based on today&amp;rsquo;s petro market pricing. And automotive emissions, including CO2, could be reducedby possibly 50% ... or more!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Oh, and that would be a&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;new&amp;quot; $0.6 TRILLION per year&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; will circulate through the domestic economy ultimately generating about&amp;nbsp; $0.6 TRILLION per year in annual tax revenue (State and Federal).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;That $0.8 TRILLION per year fuel cost savings could&amp;nbsp;pay for&amp;nbsp;between 4 and 8 million new jobs for our young people ... as well as those displaced by downsizing and outsourcing ... plus the many people returning to civilian life from the military. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The above data raises another question, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;how can the EU do in 10 years what the USA has not been able to accomplish in&amp;nbsp;30 years?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;It will be interesting to see how Barack&#039;s plans and policy statements will be adjusted to clarify HOW he will make this URGENTLY NEEDED CHANGE&amp;nbsp; ... &amp;quot;START TO HAPPEN&amp;quot; ... and HOW QUICKLY!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/44mpgby2010/gGCJyp</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/44mpgby2010/gGCJyp/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:20:44 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/44mpgby2010/gGCJyp</guid>
            <dc:creator>44 mpg (in the US) by 2010</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>44 mpg (in the US) by 2010</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGCJyp/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Kissinger - The Most Important Challenge for the Next Administration</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_three_revolutions.html&quot;&gt;Article&lt;/a&gt; today by Henry Kissinger.&amp;nbsp; The next administration will have to grapple with a new international order.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Three Revolutions by Henry Kissinger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The long-predicted national debate about national security policy has yet to occur. Essentially tactical issues have overwhelmed the most important challenge a new administration will confront: how to distill a new international order from three simultaneous revolutions occurring around the globe: (a) the transformation of the traditional state system of Europe; (b) the radical Islamist challenge to historic notions of sovereignty; and (c) the drift of the center of gravity of international affairs from the Atlantic to the Pacific and Indian Oceans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conventional wisdom holds that disenchantment with President Bush&#039;s alleged unilateralism is at the heart of European-American disagreements. But it will become apparent soon after the change of administrations that the principal difference between the two sides of the Atlantic is that America is still a traditional nation-state whose people respond to calls for sacrifices on behalf of a much wider definition of the national interest than Europe&#039;s definition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/cindyw/gGBc4G</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/cindyw/gGBc4G/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:45:44 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/cindyw/gGBc4G</guid>
            <dc:creator>Cindy in Salt Lake</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/c17620e2577997e07f_3bm6bif4i.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Cindy in Salt Lake</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBc4G/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Obama&#039;s Current Team - for insights on a future cabinet</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Brief bios of &amp;quot;Obama&#039;s Inner Circle&amp;quot; - core campaign staff, and advisors on economy, national security, justice/legal, immigration, health care, environment.&amp;nbsp; Some Cabinet Secretaries may come from this group, but certainly they will be shaping the final list of appointments.&amp;nbsp; There are several levels of appointments that require Senate confirmation, and there are also advisory positions, like Chief of Staff and Press Secretary, that do not.&amp;nbsp; For all of you fixed on members of congress, please read.&amp;nbsp;It is also&amp;nbsp;highly informative in terms of understanding policy positions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a long article. It will only be posted at Barack&#039;s Cabinet and Birdalone&#039;s blogs for reference.&amp;nbsp; AD can choose whether to post at http:puredem.wordpress.com.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This 6,400 word article by James A. Barnes is from the March 31, 2008 National Journal.&amp;nbsp; Link is: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/080331nj1.htm&quot;&gt;http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/080331nj1.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s Inner Circle &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;By James A. Barnes, National Journal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;copy; National Journal Group Inc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Monday, March 31, 2008 &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;If potential presidents can be judged by how they run their campaigns, then how they staff those efforts may provide important clues to the kinds of talent they would recruit for their administrations. Because Democratic front-runner Barack Obama is a relative newcomer to national politics, an examination of his inner circle of political and policy advisers offers new windows into his thinking, leadership style, and sources of expertise. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Democratic front-runner&#039;s team has a relatively shallow bench, but its political achievements thus far are quite impressive.&amp;nbsp; To be sure, Team Obama has made a few stumbles that give pause to some observers. One of the candidate&#039;s foreign-policy advisers resigned after a Scottish newspaper quoted her as calling Hillary Rodham Clinton a &amp;quot;monster.&amp;quot; Another, a retired general, likened former President Clinton to infamous red-baiting Joseph McCarthy. And Obama&#039;s chief economic adviser inadvertently became a minor liability after it was reported that he met with Canadian diplomats in Chicago and either played down Obama&#039;s skepticism about the North American Free Trade Agreement or had his informal remarks misinterpreted, as the campaign maintains. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s team has a relatively shallow bench: Several players are responsible for an extraordinarily wide range of policy areas. But whatever the lapses and shortcomings of Obama and his closest aides, it&#039;s hard not to be impressed with their political achievements. The campaign has taken on the power couple who have dominated Democratic politics for the past 16 years and reduced a once-mighty heir apparent to a lackluster underdog. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I would describe it as an excellent campaign,&amp;quot; says Democratic media consultant Tad Devine, who worked on the presidential campaigns of nominees John Kerry and Al Gore but is not taking sides in the Obama-Clinton battle. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Although Obama has had a solidly liberal voting record in the Senate -- the most liberal record in 2007, according to an analysis by National Journal -- his policy advisers tend to be moderates. Indeed, Obama explains his roll-call record as a product of votes that push senators to one extreme or the other, and he maintains that his presidency would move the nation into a less ideological, more cooperative era. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;What follow are mini-profiles of many of the key players on Obama&#039;s political and policy squads. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;POLITICS &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama is fortunate to have a gifted team of experienced political operatives guiding his historic run for the White House. It&#039;s a group united by deep loyalty to the candidate, even though few knew him before his 2004 campaign for the Senate. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;You have to give them really high marks for a good, solid campaign,&amp;quot; says media consultant Bill Carrick, who has been involved in Democratic presidential politics since 1980 but is currently neutral. &amp;quot;They knew exactly what they had to accomplish, and did it.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Well over a dozen political operatives have played key roles getting Obama to the brink of the 2008 Democratic nomination. At least four in particular stand out. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;David Axelrod &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Ax,&amp;quot; as he is called around the campaign&#039;s Chicago headquarters, met Obama in the early 1990s when he was a community organizer leading a voter-registration drive on the South Side. Axelrod served as advertising director for Obama&#039;s 2004 Senate campaign. Today, as Obama&#039;s chief strategist, he is responsible for crafting ads and helping the candidate to hone his message. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;A former political reporter, Axelrod, 53, left the Chicago Tribune in 1984 to become press secretary for then-Rep. Paul Simon, D-Ill., who was running for the Senate. He soon took over as campaign manager. After Simon won, Axelrod formed a political consulting firm in Chicago and quickly established himself as a fixture in Windy City politics, as well as statewide. In 1989, Axelrod went to work for Richard M. Daley in his first successful bid to be Chicago&#039;s mayor, and he has remained close to the Daley machine ever since. Although Daley&#039;s ascent to the job his legendary father had held displaced the African-American leadership from City Hall, Axelrod has helped to elect several black mayors around the country, including one of Daley&#039;s predecessors, Harold Washington. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;No one successfully navigates the byzantine and bare-knuckles world of Illinois politics without causing at least a bit of controversy, and Axelrod has been criticized over the years for some hard-hitting television spots. But his reputation in the consulting business is solid, and he is generally held in high regard. Tom O&#039;Donnell was a media consultant for Chris Van Hollen of Maryland in 2002 when he ran against Kennedy family member Mark Shriver, an Axelrod client, in a high-profile Democratic primary for a U.S. House seat. After Van Hollen won, O&#039;Donnell recalls, Axelrod &amp;quot;called me and said we ran a really good campaign. I think it&#039;s the first time I had a competitor do that,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;He&#039;s got a lot of class. And I think he&#039;s done a tremendous job in this campaign.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Since 2002, Axelrod&#039;s firm, AKP&amp;amp;D Message and Media, has worked on 42 primary or general election contests around the country and helped win 33 of them. Axelrod was a media consultant for John Edwards&#039;s 2004 presidential bid. Ironically, Axelrod interviewed to become Hillary Clinton&#039;s media consultant when she first ran for the Senate in 2000. He didn&#039;t get the job, but he did produce issue advertising boosting her candidacy for the New York Democratic Party and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;David Plouffe &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;As Obama&#039;s campaign manager, Plouffe is widely credited with running one of the most impressive presidential nominating operations in recent memory. He is known for his discipline and for his ability to maintain a steady course through a campaign&#039;s inevitable ups and downs. &amp;quot;He is the most focused, talented operative I&#039;ve ever worked with,&amp;quot; says Democratic lobbyist and Clinton supporter Steve Elmendorf. &amp;quot;He never gets distracted by any of the chatter or Beltway stuff,&amp;quot; adds Elmendorf, who, as then-House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt&#039;s chief of staff, hired Plouffe to be his deputy in 1997. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Plouffe, 40, got an early taste of presidential politics working on the 1992 Democratic bid of Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa. After it ended, he managed the re-election campaign of Rep. John Olver of Massachusetts. Plouffe returned to his home state of Delaware in 1994 to manage the unsuccessful Senate bid of then-Attorney General Charles Oberly. He then went to New Jersey to run Robert Torricelli&#039;s victorious campaign for the Senate in 1996. Afterward, Torricelli&#039;s media consultant, Bob Shrum, urged Elmendorf to hire Plouffe. He moved over to run the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the 2000 election. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;After that cycle, he joined David Axelrod&#039;s Chicago-based consulting firm. In 2004, Plouffe took a leave of absence to serve as a senior adviser to Gephardt when the Missourian made his final run at the Democratic presidential nomination. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Valerie Jarrett &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Although she isn&#039;t well known inside the Beltway, Jarrett is a fixture in Chicago politics and in the Obama family. Jarrett, 51, is a senior unpaid adviser to the campaign, and is a confidant of both the candidate and his wife, Michelle. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;She&#039;s totally loyal to both of them, can be totally honest with both of them,&amp;quot; one Obama operative said. &amp;quot;She does not pretend to know something that she doesn&#039;t know, but she is a person in the room who is not reluctant to say exactly what she thinks to the candidate and the candidate&#039;s other advisers.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jarrett&#039;s role as an honest broker in the campaign stems from her deep friendship with the candidate and his wife. Barack Obama met Jarrett in 1991 when she was Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley&#039;s deputy chief of staff and was interviewing Obama&#039;s then-fiancee for a job in City Hall. The three have been close ever since. A lawyer, Jarrett got her start in city government as a deputy corporation counsel for finance and development. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;After serving at Daley&#039;s side, Jarrett was a commissioner in the city&#039;s Planning and Development Department and went on to chair the Chicago Transit Board, which oversees the city&#039;s public transportation system. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;She is also a member of the University of Chicago&#039;s board of trustees and chairs its Medical Center Board. She is vice chair of Chicago 2016, the committee spearheading the city&#039;s bid for the Summer Olympics. Jarrett oversaw the Chicago Stock Exchange until stepping down last year to become CEO of Habitat Co., a real estate development and management firm. Some have mentioned her as an eventual mayoral candidate. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jarrett has deep roots in the Windy City. Her maternal grandfather was Robert Taylor, who ran the Chicago Housing Authority in the 1940s. Her late father-in-law is former Chicago Sun-Times columnist Vernon Jarrett. She also has a familial link to Washington: Superlawyer and Bill Clinton confidant Vernon Jordan is her great-uncle. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Robert Gibbs &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Gibbs, the Obama campaign&#039;s communications director, has probably had more to do with helping the freshman senator successfully navigate the byways of &amp;quot;the club&amp;quot; than anyone except Obama&#039;s Senate chief of staff, Peter Rouse. That&#039;s no small accomplishment, notes a veteran Democratic Senate aide: Given the hype surrounding Obama&#039;s arrival in Washington, he could have easily stumbled, making a presidential bid more difficult. &amp;quot;The spotlight was stronger on him, and he didn&#039;t have a margin of error,&amp;quot; the Senate veteran remarked. While not Obama&#039;s alter ego, Gibbs, 36, is the institutional memory of the team; he joined Obama as press secretary after he won his Senate primary and then served in that position in his Senate office. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Gibbs has experience on the presidential trail. Before he signed up with Obama, he was a press spokesman for John Kerry during the early phase of his 2004 campaign. Gibbs is also familiar with the nonstop thrust and parry of campaign coverage. He was director of communications for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee during the 2002 midterm elections, and he has served as a spokesman for high-profile Senate campaigns, including Debbie Stabenow&#039;s successful 2000 race in Michigan and then-Sen. Ernest Hollings&#039;s victorious 1998 re-election campaign in South Carolina. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;ECONOMICS &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama draws his economic advice largely from academics who fall within the broad Democratic mainstream of the dismal science, although they do have streaks of heterodoxy. Some are outsiders with few ties to the party&#039;s policy establishment in Washington, while others served in the Clinton administration or elsewhere in government. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Austan Goolsbee &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The University of Chicago economist, who by most accounts is playing a dominant role in vetting Obama&#039;s policy proposals on a wide range of issues, had managed to keep his name out of the press -- until three weeks ago. That&#039;s when news leaked of a meeting that Goolsbee held with Canadian officials to explain his candidate&#039;s call to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement. After Canadian officials said that the economist had dismissed the tough rhetoric as political posturing, the Clinton campaign used their account to argue that Obama was insincere or a secret advocate of free trade. Obama&#039;s team tried to counter by insisting that Goolsbee has played only a minor, unpaid role in the campaign, but this was disputed by other Democrats with knowledge of his influence. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Goolsbee himself certainly believes in free trade. Unlike Alan Blinder, Paul Krugman, and other left-leaning economic experts who are questioning the axiomatic belief among economists that free trade is always good, Goolsbee&#039;s faith hasn&#039;t been shaken, according to colleagues. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Those who know Goolsbee, 38, describe him as a committed centrist. He favors a variety of tax cuts and credits to accomplish Obama&#039;s major goals for health care, education, housing, and reducing poverty, and he is considered a fairly strong voice against deficit spending. Obama&#039;s choice of Goolsbee as his senior economic adviser is unusual because he has never worked in government. Goolsbee is not a political neophyte, however: He worked on Obama&#039;s 2004 Senate campaign, and he played a peripheral role in John Kerry&#039;s presidential campaign that year. The kerfuffle over his NAFTA comments may betray some lack of political experience, but colleagues say that Goolsbee is typically not caught off guard. &amp;quot;He is ambitious and political. I think he&#039;d catch on in Washington very quickly,&amp;quot; said a fellow economist who is not involved with any campaign. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Goolsbee has other skills to draw on if his role becomes more public -- he was a legendary debater at Yale University, where he won national competitions. Like most other economists, he&#039;s on record as favoring some things that few Democratic politicians would want to defend -- incentive pay for government workers, for example -- but nothing that would cause Obama bigger problems than the NAFTA flap. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jeffrey Liebman &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Like Goolsbee, Liebman is known as an academic economist with a centrist streak. Unlike Goolsbee, however, he has Washington experience -- a stint in 1998 and 1999 as the White House aide coordinating the Clinton administration&#039;s Social Security proposals. Not much came of that process, but Liebman earned the respect of Democratic economic policy experts. On the Obama campaign&#039;s relatively small policy team, the 40-year-old Liebman serves as the resident expert on tax and fiscal policy, as well as on Social Security and other entitlement programs. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;A professor at Harvard&#039;s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Liebman has a reputation for avoiding stark ideological positions and preferring empiricism to rhetoric. Although he has advocated a balanced approach to Social Security reform that includes raising payroll taxes, he has also produced research showing that such an increase would reduce employment, thus wiping out half of the revenue to be gained. In a Newsweek article earlier this year that tried to identify a &amp;quot;post-Baby Boomer&amp;quot; approach to economics, Liebman supported using monetary policy to manipulate the economy. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Christina and David Romer &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The Romers, a married couple, often do research and take on academic responsibilities as a team. Christina Romer is 49; her husband is 50. As professors at the University of California (Berkeley), they are well-known macroeconomists -- experts on the workings of the U.S. economy -- who jointly hold one of six spots on the academic committee of economists that decides when recessions begin and end. They are both steeped in the history of the country&#039;s economy and have recently produced a series of papers looking at the causes and effects of most of the major changes in tax policy in the last 100 years. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;At the same time that Obama is calling for higher income taxes on people making $250,000 or more, the Romers have found that tax increases are generally bad for economic growth and that they primarily discourage investment -- the supply-side argument that conservatives use to justify tax cuts for the rich. On the other hand, the Romers have shredded the conservative premise that tax cuts eventually force spending reductions (&amp;quot;starving the beast&amp;quot;). Instead, they concluded that tax reductions lead only to one thing -- offsetting tax increases to recover lost revenue. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Daniel Tarullo &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Tarullo worked for Bill Clinton for six years, the last three in the White House as the president&#039;s point man on international economic policy. Soon after Obama was elected to the Senate, Tarullo met him at one of those Washington gabfests where wonks break bread with the powerful. The discussion focused on the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which Tarullo opposed and Obama ultimately voted against. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;I was attracted by his unusual combination of passionate aims and calm demeanor,&amp;quot; Tarullo recalls. &amp;quot;And I became convinced he had a rare capacity for leadership that the country will need in the years ahead.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Tarullo, 55, teaches law at Georgetown University and is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. He joined Obama&#039;s advisory team in December 2006 and is the go-to guy on currency, foreign investment, and trade. With a book coming out this spring on the need for tighter regulation of banks, Tarullo is also involved in campaign policy discussions about financial regulation and the subprime-mortgage crisis. But so far, the intensity of Tarullo&#039;s interest in banking regulation is not reflected in the campaign. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;IMMIGRATION &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The 40 or so members of the campaign&#039;s Immigration Policy Advisory Committee come from diverse ethnic and professional backgrounds. The advisers range from immigration advocates to business executives; academics and lawyers are particularly well represented. Many committee members have substantial government experience. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Committee head Mariano-Florentino Cu&amp;eacute;llar, a law professor at Stanford University, said that the advisers&#039; common thread is a belief that progress on immigration reform requires &amp;quot;a certain kind of dialogue&amp;quot; -- not a fight -- that includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents; is intellectually honest; and recognizes the need to work across government jurisdictions and policy areas. &amp;quot;I think a lot of us on this committee would like to make a difference,&amp;quot; Cu&amp;eacute;llar said. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In addition to Cu&amp;eacute;llar and lawyer Preeta Bansal, Obama&#039;s top advisers include Jennifer Chac&amp;oacute;n, a law professor at the University of California (Davis); Robert Bach, a former executive associate commissioner of what was then the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Tara Magner, director of policy for the National Immigrant Justice Center; and Marc Rosenblum, a political science professor at the University of New Orleans. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Mariano-Florentino Cu&amp;eacute;llar &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;A veteran of President Clinton&#039;s 1996 re-election campaign, Cu&amp;eacute;llar, now 35, was a top Treasury Department official from 1997 to 1999. Cu&amp;eacute;llar, who goes by &amp;quot;Tino,&amp;quot; also advises Obama on criminal justice and national security issues, as well as on outreach to Latino voters. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Like Obama, he believes that comprehensive immigration reform must go beyond addressing border security and the status of the nation&#039;s 12 million illegal immigrants to confronting the current system&#039;s bureaucratic failings, providing job opportunities for American workers, promoting economic development in Latin America, and determining &amp;quot;how our immigration policy reflects our values and needs as Americans.&amp;quot; Cu&amp;eacute;llar, who joined the Obama campaign in April 2007, brings expertise on the regulatory side of immigration and international security, as well as what he calls a &amp;quot;passion&amp;quot; for refugee policy. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Preeta Bansal &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s No. 2 immigration adviser sees her role as framing the issues to &amp;quot;recognize the diversity of the immigrant community,&amp;quot; both legal and illegal. Bansal, a 42-year-old partner at law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp;amp; Flom in New York City, is a 1993-96 veteran of the Clinton White House and Justice Department. Her path first crossed Obama&#039;s at Harvard Law School, although it was mutual friends who brought her to the campaign. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Bansal became familiar with Obama&#039;s foreign-policy work through her service on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. She shares the candidate&#039;s emphasis on expanding legal immigration, especially jobs-based immigration, although Obama has also fought for placing a continued priority on family reunification. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The influential Bansal advises the senator on international human rights, legal issues, foreign policy, women&#039;s issues, and outreach to Asian-Americans. Obama &amp;quot;is able to advance progressive principles, but he&#039;s not one of these starry-eyed liberals,&amp;quot; she says. &amp;quot;With him, two plus two equals five, not four. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;NATIONAL SECURITY &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Mainstreamers.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Centrists.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Non-ideologues.&amp;quot; These words tend to pop up in descriptions of Obama&#039;s security and intelligence advisers -- words that arguably help a candidate who is derided by his rivals as inexperienced. By recruiting eminences grises such as Tony Lake and young, skilled post-Cold War diplomats such as Susan Rice, the campaign appears eager to reassure voters that Obama, with his conspicuous, or at least relative, lack of foreign-policy experience would be surrounded by seasoned hands as commander-in-chief. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Many of Obama&#039;s advisers served in the Clinton State Department or on the National Security Council. Philip Gordon and Ivo Daalder are two notables. Both are now with the Brookings Institution, as are at least three other advisers. Pentagon veterans include Richard Danzig, who was Clinton&#039;s Navy secretary; Maj. Gen. Jonathan Scott Gration, a 32-year veteran of the Air Force; and Lawrence Korb, who served as an assistant Defense secretary in the Reagan administration. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;But policy experience is no guarantee of political grace. In the past few weeks, Obama has suffered from embarrassing public gaffes by two advisers. Rice, in response to Hillary Clinton&#039;s TV ads about &amp;quot;red phone&amp;quot; calls at 3 a.m., admitted that Obama had no experience handling such crises -- but contended that neither did Clinton nor John McCain, since none of the three had been president. And Samantha Power, an academic and author, had to step down as one of Obama&#039;s closest confidants after she called Clinton a &amp;quot;monster&amp;quot; during an interview. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Tony Lake &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;One of Obama&#039;s top foreign-policy and national security advisers, Lake was once closely associated with President Clinton, having served as national security adviser from 1993 to 1997, and as the president&#039;s envoy for negotiations that ended the war between Ethiopia and Eritrea. The 68-year-old has advised a number of Democratic presidents and candidates since the 1970s, in a diplomatic career that stretches back 45 years. He and Obama met in Chicago in 2003, and Lake came aboard as a key adviser in early 2007. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Like Obama, Lake opposed the invasion of Iraq. He has since become a central defender of some of Obama&#039;s more controversial foreign-policy positions. When Hillary Clinton called Obama &amp;quot;irresponsible&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;naive&amp;quot; for agreeing, in a debate, to meet &amp;quot;separately without precondition&amp;quot; with leaders of Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela, among others, Lake came to his defense. &amp;quot;A great nation and its president should never fear negotiating with anyone,&amp;quot; Lake declared in a post-debate memo. Still, Lake and other advisers may have cringed at that and others of Obama&#039;s unequivocal assertions, such as his stated willingness to send U.S. forces into Pakistan to root out Al Qaeda without first asking that government&#039;s permission. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Susan Rice &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Rice, 43, Obama&#039;s other key adviser on national security, advanced rapidly through the diplomatic ranks at the State Department in the 1990s and was seared by the experience of the Rwandan genocide. &amp;quot;It was the most horrible thing I&#039;ve ever seen,&amp;quot; she said in a 2000 interview with the alumni magazine of her alma mater, Stanford University. &amp;quot;It makes you mad.... It makes you know that even if you&#039;re the last lone voice and you believe you&#039;re right, it is worth every bit of energy you can throw into it.&amp;quot; In 1997, she became assistant secretary of State for African affairs, after serving as President Clinton&#039;s Africa adviser on the National Security Council. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Rice began her career at management consulting firm McKinsey &amp;amp; Co. and is currently on leave from the Brookings Institution. She met Obama during his 2004 Senate campaign and has said that she was drawn to his &amp;quot;remarkably broad and deep grasp of the key foreign-policy challenges of the day.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Rice is known for her bluntness. &amp;quot;I guess you could say I&#039;m plainspoken,&amp;quot; she told Stanford magazine. &amp;quot;I can be diplomatic when I have to be. But I don&#039;t have a lot of patience for B.S.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;John Brennan &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Brennan, the president and chief executive officer of the Analysis Corp., an intelligence contractor in McLean, Va., began advising the Obama campaign on intelligence and counter-terrorism at Tony Lake&#039;s request. A 25-year CIA veteran, Brennan became the first director of the National Counterterrorism Center in 2004, and he now chairs the Intelligence and National Security Alliance, a professional association. He first traveled to the Middle East in the 1970s, studying in Egypt, and he has spent a good portion of his career on regional issues. He ran the CIA&#039;s terrorism analysis during the Persian Gulf War and then became the daily intelligence briefer at the White House. From 1996 to 1999, he served in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as the CIA&#039;s chief of station. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Brennan, 52, thinks that President Bush should have moved to ratchet down the extraordinary intelligence measures taken immediately after the September 11 attacks. After the heat of 9/11 dissipated a bit, the administration &amp;quot;should have embarked to engage meaningfully with the [congressional] oversight committees and the judiciary to put in place ... programs for the longer term,&amp;quot; Brennan told National Journal. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Like Obama, he favors a combination of public diplomacy and the option of military action to address national security threats. But the two differ on the controversial question of immunity for telecommunications companies that helped the government covertly monitor calls after 9/11. Brennan favors immunity, but Obama voted to strip retroactive immunity from the Senate intelligence bill, arguing that the matter should be settled in court. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;ENVIRONMENT &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s core environment and energy advisers come from the moderate wing of the Democratic Party. Like the candidate, they favor federal controls on greenhouse-gas emissions and greater emphasis on developing clean sources of energy. But his green-team members have spent their careers forging partnerships between environmental interests and business, not hugging trees. Many of them were attracted to Obama because of his conviction that environmental goals can be compatible with the needs of his home state&#039;s coal, farm, and nuclear industries. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Almost all of Obama&#039;s top environment and energy advisers have degrees from Harvard, although none attended Harvard Law School with him. The Washington insiders and outsiders who make up his environmental lineup include Daniel Esty, an environmental law professor at Yale who was at the Environmental Protection Agency during the George H.W. Bush administration; Daniel Kammen, an energy and public policy professor at the University of California (Berkeley); and Robert Sussman, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress who spent 10 years practicing environmental law at Latham &amp;amp; Watkins, and was at EPA during the Clinton administration. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Jason Grumet &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The campaign&#039;s official environment and energy policy committee is headed by Grumet, president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington-based nonprofit established in 2007 by four former Senate majority leaders. The group focuses on developing bipartisan solutions to national security, health care, energy, agriculture, and transportation problems. Before taking that post, Grumet, 41, was executive director of the National Commission on Energy Policy, a coalition of industry, academic, and environmental representatives focused on promoting environmentally friendly energy policies. The commission has since been folded into the policy center. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Grumet met Obama in 2005, after the Illinois Democrat was elected to the Senate. He worked with Obama on his collaboration with Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on strengthening federal fuel-economy standards for cars. Grumet said he was impressed with Obama&#039;s eagerness to forge compromises with Republicans and other interests involved in the debate. &amp;quot;Having been frustrated in this town for several years with the heroic rhetoric on oil dependence and then the total lack of policy progress, I thought [Obama&#039;s approach] was the way that you can make real progress,&amp;quot; Grumet said. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Howard Learner &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Among Obama&#039;s top environmental advisers, Learner has the longest track record with the Illinois Democrat. Learner, 52, is executive director of the Environmental Law and Policy Center, a Chicago-based advocacy group. He linked up with Obama in the early 1990s, when Obama had just finished law school and Learner was general counsel at Business and Professional People for the Public Interest, a Chicago-based law and policy center. &amp;quot;I got to know Michelle Obama and Barack Obama as public-spirited, public-interest lawyers in Chicago who were looking to make a difference,&amp;quot; Learner recalls. &amp;quot;Everybody recognized that they were tremendously talented.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;In 1996, Learner joined Obama&#039;s successful campaign for the Illinois state Senate, and he worked with him on early efforts to require state utilities to generate some of their electricity from renewable resources. Learner says that the renewable-electricity bill adopted last year by the Illinois Legislature was built on Obama&#039;s original proposals. He also worked on Obama&#039;s U.S. Senate race. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Frank Loy &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Loy says he first noticed Obama in 2004, when Obama gave his celebrated keynote address at the Democratic National Convention. After Obama&#039;s election to the Senate, Loy began raising money for his presidential race and has since become one of the campaign&#039;s top environmental advisers. Loy argues that Obama is the best candidate to break the stalemates on energy and environmental issues. &amp;quot;In our system, it is not enough to just elect a new president,&amp;quot; Loy said. &amp;quot;As president, you need to be able to operate in a way that gets things done. And that requires both the personality and the history and an attitude that Barack Obama has. He has an amazing ability to work across the aisle and attract voters that are not your standard reliable Democratic voters.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Loy was an impressive addition to the campaign. The 79-year-old pillar of the environmental community serves on the boards of several national green groups. He held State Department posts during the Clinton, Carter, and Johnson administrations, and he spent 14 years as president of the German Marshall Fund. Loy&#039;s public service stint followed a long career in corporate America. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;HEALTH CARE &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s message that lowering health care costs is an essential first step to getting nearly every American insured is one that fits his top health care advisers well. Indeed, two of the three are based in Massachusetts and, thus, have firsthand knowledge of how high costs nearly killed that state&#039;s landmark universal coverage plan. Massachusetts last year became the first state to require nearly every resident to have health insurance, but the public resisted when premium prices were more expensive than forecast. The Massachusetts experience, Obama&#039;s top health care advisers say, reinforced a message that they -- as a team -- have delivered before: All three helped John Kerry&#039;s 2004 presidential campaign develop a proposal to lower health care costs. They have Washington experience, are established and well respected in Democratic and academic circles, and have worked on other campaigns with advisers who this year lined up behind different candidates. &amp;quot;A lot of us have worked together. It turned out the health policy world is not enormously large,&amp;quot; said David Cutler, professor of applied economics at Harvard&#039;s John F. Kennedy School of Government. In addition to Obama&#039;s health-specific advisers, two of his top economic advisers -- Austan Goolsbee, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, and Jeffrey Liebman, a professor of public policy at Harvard University -- helped craft Obama&#039;s health proposal. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;David Cutler &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;A professor of applied economics at Harvard&#039;s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cutler is no stranger to Washington. Obama&#039;s top health care adviser served on the Council of Economic Advisers and the National Economic Council during the Clinton administration, and he helped develop the Clintons&#039; failed universal health care proposal in the early 1990s. Cutler also worked on health care blueprints for Democratic presidential candidates Bill Bradley in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Although he&#039;s in Obama&#039;s camp, Cutler isn&#039;t a critic of Hillary Clinton&#039;s current health care package. &amp;quot;If you said to me that Senator Obama was never going to run and, &#039;What do you think about Clinton&#039;s plan?&#039; I would say, &#039;It&#039;s a terrific plan,&#039; &amp;quot; Cutler said. He added: &amp;quot;Whoever the Democratic nominee is will have the support on health care of the entire policy community on the left. I don&#039;t know of anyone who&#039;s uncomfortable in some fundamental way with what is in the plans.&amp;quot; Still, Cutler, 42, maintains that it&#039;s critically important to lower costs before mandating that everyone have coverage, as Clinton has proposed. &amp;quot;If you make insurance affordable and accessible, you will get to 98 or 99 percent of covered people,&amp;quot; he predicts. &amp;quot;Maybe after that you can come in with a mandate for small pockets of people.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;David Blumenthal &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;When Blumenthal isn&#039;t developing health care proposals for Democratic presidential contenders (this is his fourth go-round), the physician is seeing patients, writing books, teaching at Harvard, and promoting his health reform ideas in Washington. Blumenthal, 59, helped develop a health care proposal in 1988 for Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis that focused on getting all employers to offer insurance. He worked on health care policy for Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., during his presidential run in 1980, and for John Kerry in 2004. Blumenthal, director of the Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital and a professor of medicine and policy at Harvard, also helped the Dukakis and Kerry campaigns retool their health care proposals for the general election. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;When Obama declared for president, Cutler, who was already working with the senator, contacted Blumenthal. On the Obama campaign, Blumenthal has advocated a strong commitment to funding and adopting health information technology, and Obama has proposed spending $10 billion a year for five years to move toward standards-based electronic health care systems for doctors and hospitals. (Clinton has proposed spending $3 billion a year for several years.) Blumenthal is writing a book that examines what former presidents have proposed and accomplished in the way of health care access and cost containment. He hopes that it will be out in time to influence whatever health care initiatives Congress and the new president pursue next year. &amp;quot;In American politics, you elect a president, not a plan,&amp;quot; he said. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Stuart Altman &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The Obama campaign came looking for Altman specifically to get the veteran health care economist to resurrect a proposal he had drawn up for John Kerry&#039;s presidential campaign. (Altman and Obama policy strategist Heather Higginbottom had worked together on Kerry&#039;s campaign.) The proposal would have the federal government reimburse employers for some catastrophic health care costs and would require employers to use that money to reduce workers&#039; premiums. It has become a major selling point of Obama&#039;s health care plan, and it marks one of the few distinctions between his proposal and Hillary Clinton&#039;s. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Altman, the 70-year-old dean of Brandeis University&#039;s Heller School for Social Policy and Management, helped develop a plan for President Nixon that would have required most employers to buy insurance for their workers and would have created a federal health plan that anyone could purchase. He served on President Clinton&#039;s transition team but declined to participate in the Clintons&#039; health care reform effort in the early 1990s. &amp;quot;It was too big, a total restructuring of our whole health system,&amp;quot; he says. Altman praises Hillary Clinton&#039;s current health care plan, however, and notes that it resembles Obama&#039;s proposal. One difference he supports is Obama&#039;s wait-and-see approach to mandating that everyone have health insurance. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;LEGAL AFFAIRS &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Obama doesn&#039;t need advisers to prep him on constitutional theory. He lectured on the topic at the University of Chicago after moving to the Windy City in 1991 upon receiving his Harvard law degree magna cum laude. He is at ease fielding questions from voters who oppose President Bush&#039;s expansive interpretations of executive powers on issues ranging from torture to habeas corpus to war powers. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Nonetheless, Obama has tapped into his networks at Chicago and Harvard for legal advisers -- for policy advice and for counsel on campaign matters. His University of Chicago roots help explain his philosophical preference for incentives rather than mandates, a key difference between his plan for achieving universal health coverage and that of Hillary Clinton. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;His Harvard advisers include heavy hitters in constitutional and criminal justice law, such as professors Martha Minow and Ronald Sullivan and former Harvard professor Christopher Edley Jr., now dean of the law school at the University of California (Berkeley). From beyond the ivory towers, Obama&#039;s legal thinkers include Eric Holder, deputy attorney general during the Clinton administration; and Cassandra Butts, a former Harvard classmate and now senior vice president for domestic policy at the Center for American Progress, who has advised him on domestic policy. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Laurence Tribe &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Tribe remembers Obama as one of his best students in his 40 years of teaching constitutional law at Harvard. Tribe has argued three dozen cases before the Supreme Court, and he literally wrote the textbook on constitutional law used across the country. He argued Vice President Gore&#039;s side in Bush v. Gore, the Florida vote-counting case, before the Supreme Court in 2000, so it&#039;s no wonder that he is part of the team that Obama has assembled to respond to any voting irregularities or other legal issues that arise in the campaign. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;A leading liberal scholar, Tribe, 66, is also an active member of an ad hoc group of policy experts who advise Obama on habeas corpus and other constitutional concerns, as well as on increasing Americans&#039; access to the justice system. Tribe told National Journal that he and other legal affairs advisers worked on a set of policy proposals -- but that Obama&#039;s own ideas were better. &amp;quot;He&#039;s very interested always in finding common ground,&amp;quot; Tribe said. &amp;quot;It&#039;s not so much finding the midpoint on a line where people are arranged from left to right, but finding a way to get an angle that&#039;s perpendicular -- or comes at the line from a different angle.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Charles Ogletree &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Another Obama-professor-turned-adviser is Ogletree, 55, who has been at Harvard since 1985. Before that, he was a District of Columbia public defender, which shaped his professorial focus on civil rights and criminal justice. He wrote a book on school desegregation, and he counseled Anita Hill when she testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the confirmation hearings for now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Ogletree has advised Obama on reforming the criminal-justice system as well on constitutional issues. He is a member of the Obama campaign&#039;s black advisory council, which also includes Cornel West, who teaches African-American studies at Princeton University. The group formed after Obama skipped a conference on African-American issues in Hampton, Va., to announce his presidential candidacy in Illinois. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Cass Sunstein &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;From the University of Chicago, law professor Cass Sunstein, 53, joins Tribe and Ogletree in advising Obama on an ad hoc basis. Sunstein is headed to Harvard later this year after 27 years at Chicago. Earlier, he worked at the Justice Department&#039;s Office of Legal Counsel and clerked for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Sunstein&#039;s stint at OLC -- the executive branch&#039;s legal advice center -- gave him a special appreciation of presidential prerogatives that can help his former law school colleague develop nuanced positions on separation-of-powers issues. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Many Democrats have railed against Bush&#039;s use of presidential signing statements, for example. Like Sunstein, Obama has not rejected the use of signing statements outright; both argue that as long as the statements don&#039;t purport to overturn law, they can be useful in explaining how a president intends to carry out the will of Congress. &amp;quot;There&#039;s nothing wrong with signing statements as such,&amp;quot; Sunstein told National Journal. He also shares Obama&#039;s University of Chicago-honed preference for incentives rather than mandates. Sunstein and fellow Chicago professor Richard Thaler have written Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, a book published this month that expounds on this theme. &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;(Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly reported that top immigration adviser Mariano-Florentino Cu&amp;eacute;llar opposes the fence being constructed on the U.S.-Mexico border. National Journal deeply regrets the error.) &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Staff Correspondents Lisa Caruso, Brian Friel, Shane Harris, Margaret Kriz, John Maggs, Marilyn Werber Serafini, and Bruce Stokes contributed to this article. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Source: http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/080331nj1.htm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/birdalone1/gGBxyZ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/birdalone1/gGBxyZ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:43:36 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/birdalone1/gGBxyZ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Taube</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/b22834d2b38b933304_4xrmv2w36.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Taube</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBxyZ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Moving Beyond the Iraq War to Enlightened Global Leadership</title>
            <description>&amp;quot;I don&#039;t want to just end the war,&amp;quot; Sen. Obama said in the California debate (Jan. 31), &amp;quot;but I want to end the mind-set that got us into war in the first place.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; Yes, this election is largely about ending the Iraq War, but even more it&#039;s about moving beyond it.&amp;nbsp; Spencer Ackerman, a senior correspondent for The American Prosepect and a senior reporter for The Washington Independent, has written a very interesting piece on Obama&#039;s foreign policy team and the national security directions&amp;nbsp;Pres. Obama&amp;nbsp;is likely to take.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This is a must read for foreign policy wonks.&amp;nbsp; See the full article at&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org:80//cs/articles;jsessionid=ah-BhpO1rR08rzx0NJ?article=the_obama_doctrine&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Beyond the Iraq War&quot;&gt;http://www.prospect.org:80//cs/articles;jsessionid=ah-BhpO1rR08rzx0NJ?article=the_obama_doctrine&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGBRlh</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGBRlh/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:18:25 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/billmarjenhoff/gGBRlh</guid>
            <dc:creator>Bill Marjenhoff</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/323057b4f32d719bb1_c2m6bddvd.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Bill Marjenhoff</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBRlh/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Al Qaeda Influencing our Elections</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, this is the second time I am posting my thoughts today, this time on National Security.   One thing I have been pondering for a while is the idea of a planned terrorist strike days before the general election as an attempt to influence our election in al Qaeda&#039;s favor. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think most will agree that any national security issue close to an election will help John McCain due to his perceived &amp;quot;experience&amp;quot; on national security and foreign policy. But I think a very easy argument could be made that if al Qaeda wanted Senator Obama as our president because his policies are in its favor (making an argument), they, in fact, should do nothing because that would hurt his chances for being elected. So any terrorist attack close to the general election should be argued that al Qaeda wants McCain in office because his policies are more in its favor.   I beleive that al Qaeda strongly wants John McCain as our next president because they get more of the same and we are playing into their favor. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would suggest reading the book Brave New War by John Robb. Some interesting point he makes:  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Al Qaeda wanted us to react to 9/11 exactly as we did, except they wanted our troop levels in Iraq to be in Afganistan (because they just fought and won the ultimate Jihad against the Soviet 40th Red Army). They are trying to bleed us, literally and financially, and that&#039;s exactly what they are doing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. The insurgency we are fighting is &amp;quot;open source&amp;quot; warfare, like Wikipedia is to information. Anyone with the very low cost of entry, and the misguided motivation, can participate fairly easily.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. The return this type of insurgency is getting on its return is phenomenal. A five man team with about $5,000 in supplies can wreak havoc on oil lines and other forms of infrastructure causing hundreds of millions of dollars in damage.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. We are playing the game exactly how they want us to play.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As long as John McCain is keeping these same policies, al Qaeda is getting what they want. I think this needs to be thought about and addressed before it&#039;s too late. I don&#039;t know an easy way to come out and say &amp;quot;if we are attacked it&#039;s because al Qaeda wants John McCain&amp;quot;, but that&#039;s what I think needs to be the message. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/matthewfinnie/gGBHzQ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/matthewfinnie/gGBHzQ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:10:40 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/matthewfinnie/gGBHzQ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/ff656f4b5a90cd0b61_e3rsmvqes.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Matthew</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBHzQ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>CNN Picks up Story of the REAL OBAMA GIRL - LOL!</title>
            <description>&lt;strong&gt;BONNEY LAKE, Washington (AP)&lt;/strong&gt; -- Casey Knowles didn&#039;t much like a recent campaign commercial for Hillary Clinton -- even though she&#039;s in it as a sleeping 8-year-old.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/POLITICS/03/10/clinton.ad.obama.ap/art.clinton.next.gi.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;art.clinton.next.gi.jpg&quot; width=&quot;292&quot; height=&quot;219&quot; /&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton&#039;s ad aired in Texas before last week&#039;s vote and implied a lack of experience on Barack Obama&#039;s part. &lt;/p&gt;After all, she about to turn 18 now and is a big supporter of Barack Obama.&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;What I don&#039;t like about the ad is its fear-mongering,&amp;quot; Knowles told ABC&#039;s &amp;quot;Good Morning America Weekend Edition&amp;quot; on Sunday. &amp;quot;I think it&#039;s a cheap hit to take. I really prefer Obama&#039;s message of looking forward to a bright future.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The well-known Clinton ad aired in Texas before last week&#039;s vote and implied a lack of experience on Obama&#039;s part. It showed an exterior of a Colonial-style home and old stock footage of Knowles sleeping in bed. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A narrator describes a phone ringing in the White House: &amp;quot;It&#039;s 3 a.m. and your children are safely asleep. Who do you want answering the phone?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clinton won the Texas primary by a 51-47 percent margin.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Knowles said she didn&#039;t see the ad until Jon Stewart lampooned it Thursday on &amp;quot;The Daily Show.&amp;quot; Her brother noticed it was her, and the family replayed the commercial on their digital recorder to be sure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;They were parodying this ad, kind of poking fun at it,&amp;quot; Knowles said. &amp;quot;My brother was like, &#039;Is that Casey?&#039; And we just erupted. Sure enough, it&#039;s me.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The file footage was originally shot for a railroad company advertisement. The Clinton campaign bought it from Getty Images.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Knowles, a senior at Bonney Lake High School who turns 18 next month, has been campaigning for &lt;a href=&quot;http://topics.cnn.com/topics/barack_obama&quot;&gt;Obama&lt;/a&gt;. She attended his rally at Seattle&#039;s KeyArena on February 8. Her mother, Pam, told The News Tribune of Tacoma that Casey cried and trembled after shaking the candidate&#039;s hand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The next day, she was a Democratic precinct captain for the state&#039;s caucuses. If she plays her cards right, she could go to the national convention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to mention that she could be in another ad. After her identity became known, Obama&#039;s campaign contacted her.&lt;/p&gt;&amp;quot;I mentioned that we should make a counter ad, me and Obama, against Hillary,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;They thought that was really funny. They actually might take me up on it.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;That said, Knowles said she plans to vote for whichever Democrat wins the nomination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBq4N</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBq4N/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBq4N</guid>
            <dc:creator>Soldierette!! (CENSORED)</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/5aea757872005591bf_o2c7mv74t.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Soldierette!! (CENSORED)</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBq4N/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>It is time for Colin Powell to step up!</title>
            <description>I just finished reading this article: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/03/17/080317fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would recommend it for members of CSTT, as it points out some areas where Obama can neutralize the HRC/Penn strategy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last month the name of Colin Powell was thrown around as a potential supporter of Obama. It was thought by many that Powell could better be used in the General Election, since many &amp;quot;Move-On.Org&amp;quot; types (no offense meant) are critical of the retired General/Sec. State. IF it is true that Powell does harbor private enthusiasm for Obama, then the time is now to encourage his support. This support would help neutralize (IMHO) the HRC National Security/Experience attack against Obama.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Powell, and his aide Col. Wilkerson, have been critical of the Bush Administration . . .and how Cheney bullied the State Department . . . so I am on Powell&#039;s side - in that he was not part of the war-mongering crew, but a muzzled voice of reason.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Feel free to reply with your thoughts on this idea/strategy . . .then maybe we can ACTION it from here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;E</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ej1975/gGBqKg</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ej1975/gGBqKg/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:06:41 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ej1975/gGBqKg</guid>
            <dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/a73933139d3666993e_4jm6bn48q.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Erick</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBqKg/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Hillary&#039;s &quot;Red Phone&quot; little girl is all grown up and an Obama supporter</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;You guys won&#039;t believe this one. LOL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The little &amp;quot;sleeping girl&amp;quot; in Billary&#039;s &amp;quot;Red Phone&amp;quot; ad is all grown up now, about to turn 18 in April, and GUESS WHO SHE SUPPORTS? LMAO!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She&#039;s an OBAMANITE!! She&#039;s been canvassing and was a precinct captain in February. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She wants to make a &amp;quot;counter-ad&amp;quot; with Sen. Obama! I would LOVE to see that! LOL! LOL!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;check it out here - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJMFic1ZL1A&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJMFic1ZL1A&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBqKD</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBqKD/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:47:05 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/soldierette/gGBqKD</guid>
            <dc:creator>Soldierette!! (CENSORED)</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/5aea757872005591bf_o2c7mv74t.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Soldierette!! (CENSORED)</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBqKD/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Credibility on National Security</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The following editorial (written by the newspaper&#039;s editor) appeared in the Grant County Herald newspaper (Elbow Lake, Minnesota, population 1213) in the March 5th, 2008 edition:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &amp;lsquo;credibility&amp;rsquo; issue is not credible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;During last Tuesday&amp;rsquo;s Democratic debate televised by MSNBC, an exchange took place that might have been little noticed by most, but very indicative of how the media has it all wrong. Moderator Brian Williams questioned Democratic hopeful Barrack Obama about his fitness to compete in a presidential race with the &amp;ldquo;vast foreign policy expertise and credibility on national security&amp;rdquo; of Sen. John McCain.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;Okay, let&amp;rsquo;s take a look at two quotes, one by Senator McCain and the other by then Illinois State Senator Barrack Obama, made before the U.S. invasion into Iraq, on the possible outcome of that war.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;On November 29, 2002 on CNN&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;Late Edition,&amp;rdquo; Sen. McCain said. &amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re not going to get into house-to-house fighting in Baghdad. We may have to take out buildings, but we&amp;rsquo;re not going to have a bloodletting of trading American bodies for Iraqi bodies.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;He added, &amp;ldquo;I don&amp;rsquo;t think it&amp;rsquo;s easy, but I believe that we can win an overwhelming victory in a very short period of time.&amp;rdquo;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;On MSNBC&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;Hardball,&amp;rdquo; on March 24, 2003 McCain predicted, &amp;ldquo;we will be welcomed as liberators.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;In contrast, Obama made a prominent speech around the same time, October 2, 2002, in which he said, &amp;ldquo;But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of Al-Qaeda.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p XSSCleaned=&quot;margin-left: 0.79in&quot;&gt;Williams, and most network pundits, seem to assume that McCain, who was completely wrong about the Iraq invasion has &amp;ldquo;vast expertise&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;credibility&amp;rdquo; on national security, while Obama, who correctly foresaw the consequences of the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history, needs to prove his foreign policy qualifications. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have not jumped on the Obama bandwagon yet, but if &amp;ldquo;foreign policy expertise and credibility on national security&amp;rdquo; are the major issues McCain and the Republicans plan to use in this campaign, make room for me Obama supporters, I&amp;rsquo;m climbing aboard.&lt;br /&gt;C. A. Ray&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note: I have quoted it in it&#039;s entirety because the on-line version of the paper does not seem to have links to archives of past editions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The link to the newspaper&#039;s current editorial page is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grantherald.com/opinion.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.grantherald.com/opinion.htm&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Who do you want answering the phone at 3:00 am?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/keithwilson/gGBQlQ</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/keithwilson/gGBQlQ/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:19:30 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/keithwilson/gGBQlQ</guid>
            <dc:creator>Keith Wilson</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/a72c62cbf1b2888070_cegmv2474.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Keith Wilson</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGBQlQ/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>&quot;It&#039;s for you, Bill&quot;</title>
            <description>This morning on CNN, John Roberts mused about Hillary Clinton&#039;s purported experiece advantage. He said &amp;quot;some have said the only experience she has with taking a national security call at 3 in the morning is to say &#039;it&#039;s for you, Bill.&amp;quot; I know Senator Obama is all about taking the high road, but it is ridiculous for Senator Clinton to claim eight years of experience as chief executive of the United States. The more she repeats it and it goes unchallenged, the more likely people are going to believe it. I want to see the records of her appointments in her White Hours days. Was she meeting with the Joint Chiefs of Staff? Did she discuss policy with them? Did she make the strategic decisions? If so, then she has the right to claim the experience. I personally doubt that Bill Clinton stood on the sidelines while Hillary managed national security.</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/freddomke/gGgCV9</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/freddomke/gGgCV9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:39:33 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/freddomke/gGgCV9</guid>
            <dc:creator>Fred Domke</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/a1044511fcce9da4c0_t6m6iv8i1.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Fred Domke</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGgCV9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Why This Marine is Voting for O Because of His Foreign Policy</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;When we (the Marines) first landed in Somalia, and for a couple months thereafter, we mainly stayed in our tanks and hummers, with weapons out, flak jackets tight, and helmets low--the low helmet makes you look a bit more deadly. For these first 2 months, all we really did was patrol and secure UN feeding sites.&amp;nbsp; Rocks and bullets flew at us both at the vehicles (I have a few choice scars) and where we were staying, at the &amp;quot;Stadium&amp;quot;; right on the geographic green line between the two warring clans.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Our commanding officer, however, was a student of military history who had studied what worked and what didn&#039;t work in Viet Nam. What didn&#039;t work was staying in the tanks. What eventually worked for us in Mogadishu was dismounting and literally walking the streets and talking to the &amp;quot;sierra nevadas&amp;quot;, or Somali Nationals. What a surprise! The people were really interested to talk to us, work on their English skills, and basically learn about America.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;We started doing more than just patrolling and securing feeding stations.&amp;nbsp; Our corpsmen (medics) set up and treated the sick kids--there was once a pregnant woman who came through one of our roadblocks who had been shot in the abdomen--she was given immediate care and we rushed her to the UN hospital. Both baby and mom were saved. We &amp;quot;procured&amp;quot; lumber from the UN compound and gave it to the local clans to rebuild schools and buildings.&amp;nbsp; We used our wreckers to haul off burnt hulks of cars in the streets. Markets reopened. And guess what? The rocks stopped flying. The bullets no longer rang through the stadium at night.&amp;nbsp; In a very small way, in a very isolated area of Somalia, we had won their hearts and minds. They didn&#039;t ask or beg us to do these things for them.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We didn&#039;t demand they stop shooting at us before we did these things.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Marines did these things without precondition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This, my friends, is why I&#039;m voting for Barack Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jackholt/gGC7WX</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jackholt/gGC7WX/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:24:12 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jackholt/gGC7WX</guid>
            <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/18a9cab5823358fd7f_1hm6bhnaw.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Jack</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGC7WX/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>The right man for the job!</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;This is a glimpse of how I see Barack Obama&amp;rsquo;s point of view and approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;McCain keeps harping that Barack&#039;s claims,&amp;rdquo; to change America,&amp;rdquo; are ridiculous and empty. Barack simple wants to return America to the way it used to be not so long ago with a prosperous and healthy middle class. He wants to restore our military strength and national security to their former levels by avoiding senseless conflicts while concentrating on recreating a level playing field upon which we can conduct trade with other nations. He would like to&amp;nbsp;restablize &amp;nbsp;our national security. He is concerned with the degradation of our national security and believes a productive and united&amp;nbsp;prosperous nation will, as before, generate the revenue needed to afford us the most sophisticated weapons and military on earth. He is also under the impression we need to once again return this country and its constitutional rights back to its people. He believes, as I do, that if someone can affect us in such a way as to cause us to live in fear for the foreseeable future they have won. He plans to seek and find solutions to problems around the world by working with other nations including those who see things much differently than we do. He knows we all see things, to one degree or another, differently, and refusal to negotiated with those who see things differently amounts to nothing less than isolation and the nullification of all but our own national values. He realizes we must respect others and their cultures as we and our cultures wish to be respected. He knows we must attract and be willing to work with those who are sitting at the other end of the table to find mutually acceptable solutions possibly with compromise on both sides. He knows that only a bully will insist on having everything his way, and knows we need to correct that all to prevalent recently acquired perception of us. &amp;nbsp;He knows no one wants to negotiate with a bully. He knows the way back to the America we were once famous for and is willing and determined to take us there despite a likely uphill battle. He is more than willing to take on the treasonous corporate greed which has allowed the outsourcing or our nation by its wealthy aristocrats, along with their corporations and politicians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I know it may likely take several years if not a decade or two to repair the damage done to America since the passing of NAFTA and the reckless negligence of the Bush presidency, and hope we can be patient and supportive and not lose our focus during this period. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnarchibald/gGC7Xd</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnarchibald/gGC7Xd/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:01:14 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnarchibald/gGC7Xd</guid>
            <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/profile_picture/e2ed6fd66b3de6fdef_o09mvyx8f.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>John</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGC7Xd/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>