Phil Agnes and other lawyers have two words for homeowners facing foreclosure: Stay put.
The flood of foreclosures has clogged the courts, allowing homeowners to stay in their homes while the paperwork goes through the system. Many homeowners are unaware that they can remain at home for months while the foreclosure is in court, attorneys say. Read more about foreclosures...
The Recession Survival Fair will take place on 6/6 at the Brooklyn Brownstone School in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. Volunteers are needed now. Details here:
http://signsanssignified.blogspot.com/2009/05/recession-survival-fairvolunteers.html
Dear President Obama,
Great news! I have been writing senators and representatives for months saying that unless we stopped the torrent of foreclosures coming down the river, we would need another 700 billion dollar bailout soon. Taking steps to stop the flow is absolutely essential. But please bear in mind that it is not just those who are behind in their payments who are suffering and struggling. I know of one family whose income was cut down to 30% of what is was, he took a job 40 miles away, commutes in a gas-guzzling truck that he can't sell because oil prices went crazy and they are still making their house payments on time ... because they feel it is the right thing to do. I applaud their courage and integrity but I imagine it is hard for them to keep that integrity intact when others who gave up and quit making payments are getting help and they cannot.
Now, please take the next necessary step. Get the glut of foreclosures absorbed. The $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers WILL NOT DO THAT, and here's why:
1) Most first-time home buyers are not standing in a pile of cash when they buy. Most often, they are scraping nickels together, asking for a little help from Mom & Dad, etc. Where do our lawmakers in Washington think these first-time home buyers are going to get the money to make these homes habitable?
2) Distress-sale properties are neglected or intentionally damaged because the homeowner is angry about losing it. Last week, (in 17-degree weather), I showed four homes to a first-time home buyer who wanted to buy one of these great foreclosure deals. None of them had heat on or lights. None of them were winterized. ALL of them had ice frozen in the bottom of the toilet bowl. When spring hits and the pipes let loose, that’ll be a $5,000 repair, thank you very much! Do you really think I should even suggest to a buyer he/she buy such a headache? Not for more than 10 cents on the dollar, anyway.
3) What first-time home buyer – or ANY buyer, for that matter -- is going to buy a home without being able to inspect it? Many of these third-party foreclosure companies refuse to turn the lights and heat on so a buyer can do inspections. They are selling it as-is, whatever as-is is, apparently.
4) A high percentage of first-time home buyers want to finance FHA. FHA will not finance a home that requires significant repairs but Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae won’t even turn the lights on to see if the furnace works. What do you think an FHA appraiser will do with that? Kill the deal!! Understandably so. What our legislators don’t seem to grasp is that FHA and Freddie/Fannie are working at cross purposes.
If you want to get rid of the foreclosures on the market, there is a very simple solution that will: 1) Absorb the glut of distress-sale properties within 12 – 18 months; 2) put trades people back to work; 3) Curtail the plummeting, deep-discounting of well-maintained homes because of the neighboring distress sales, and 4) free up cash for banks to lend money again.
ELIMINATE capital gains tax on any real estate purchase in 2009 and 2010. That’s it, nothing more. An investor could buy a $50,000 home in Wyoming, put $20,000 into it, and sell it where it should in a reasonably normal, healthy market, say, $90,000 to $100,000. The folks who are trying to sell the home they’ve taken good care of for 20 years are getting hammered by the foreclosure dumps. But if they were competing against other decent homes, they would not be subjected to the huge discounting happening now. Not only that, but remember those first-time home buyers who are not standing in a pile of cash? THEY would have choices of homes to buy that would require they spend thousands of dollars making it livable. Simple.
A lot of investors who lost 30, 40, 50% in stocks over the past couple years have moved their money into T-bills and are waiting to see where to invest it to make money. If they saw an opportunity to make 20 or 30% on their investment TAX-FREE, they would jump into the market. But would THEY do the work to fix them up? No, of course not. They would call plumbers and electricians, and furnace people and plumbers … and our trades would go back to work.
There would be no need for Mr. Gaithner’s joint venture to buy up bad paper. Our free-market economy will have already taken care of it.
Respectfully, Mr. President,
HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT TIME IS A TICKEN!First time home buyers purchasing any kind of home—new or resale—are eligible for the tax credit. To qualify for the tax credit, a home purchase must occur on or after April 9, 2008 and before July 1, 2009. For the purposes of the tax credit, the purchase date is the date when closing occurs.You claim the tax credit on your federal income tax return. No other applications or forms are required. No pre-approval is necessary; however, prospective home buyers will want to be sure they qualify for the credit under the income limits and first-time home buyer tests.Any home purchased by an eligible first-time home buyer will qualify for the credit, provided that the home will be used as a principal residence and the buyer has not owned a home in the previous three years. This includes single-family detached homes, attached homes like townhouses and condominiums, manufactured homes (also known as mobile homes) and houseboats.CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO START YOUR SEARCH FOR A REALTOR A HOME, GET PRE-APPROVED AND GET MOVING TODAY!http://138761-micro.yourmlshomesearch.com/atj/microsite/MicrositePageGetAction.do
Schedule Update:
January 24, 2009, Air time - 8.00 - 10.00 P.M(PST)
Category: Current Events
Topic: Wall Street Bailout
Discussion:
What should financial institutions do with taxpayers’ bailout?
Why haven’t the financial institutions invested funds to stimulate economy?
What is public demand from them and the legislators?
——————————————————————————————————————-
January 25, 2009, Air Time 2.00 - 4.00P.M (PST) - (5.00 - 7.00P.M EST)
Topic: Free Palestine
1. How can we help to expedite independent state for Palestinians free of Israeli blockade, occupation and aggression?
2. What should the new administration do to be a trustworthy partner and unbiased peace broker in the Middle East conflict?
3. How can we help Israeli population elect a moderate government in early February favoring peace and diplomacy over military action for their national security and sovereignty?
——————————————————————————————————————
January 30, 2009, 120 minutes 2.00P.M - 4.00P.M - Cancelled due to restrictions on segments at frequent intervals.
Topic: Economy and Health Care - Please refer to blog post on www.padminiarhant.com for details and I invite you to post comments.
What should the new administration do for you and the economy?
How do we fix the Health Care system?
———————————————————————————-
Podcast live : http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Padmini-A
Guest Call-in-number: (646) 727 -3778
I invite you all to participate in the public forum and share your concerns, ideas and knowledge.
Your comments and thoughts are welcome in the political discourse.
Let us keep democracy alive and help our new President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in rebuilding our nation.
Your participation is a huge encouragement and always appreciated - Thank you again.
Look forward to the session.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
I will be doing a live radio show for 120 minutes from 2.00P.M to 4.00P.M. (PST) on the following days:
January 23, 2009 Friday from 2.00 - 4.00 P.M (PST) to accommodate listeners from all time zones.
Topic: Corporate Bailout
What should financial institutions do with the taxpayers’ bailout?
Why have they not utilized those funds to stimulate economy?
———————————————————————
January 30, 2009, 120 minutes 2.00P.M - 4.00P.M
Topic: Economy and Health Care
P.S. My apologies for not being able to schedule a convenient time on January 21, 2009. I am aiming to provide as much time as possible through whatever avenues available in getting us back on our feet.
With the increasing number of people unemployed, which translates to loss of medical coverage if you had it, fewer jobs available and so on.........there is a tsunami effect impactiing many people in this country that falls under the radar. I'm not referring to the long-term unemployed who no longer receive benefits - there have been guestimates on that number - but in reference to the recently unemployed who lose their medical coverage, who are homeowners in and heading in to foreclosure who are over 50 years of age, who experience sudden medical trauma, and still owe on their student loans. This group of people are compounded with the most critical top 5 issues that these political blogs and pundits have yet to address: people who have or are about to lose everything.
I should know...I am one of them.
As a third generation college graduate baby boomer who put two kids through college, I had a 25 year career in corporate America, worked as an independent consultant in higher education and training and in the entertainment field until life took an upswing and then a resounding crash. That's life. But in the downward spiral of the nations economy, a single Black woman well over 50 years of age isn't looked on as marketable. I spent 25 years in Human Resources so I know what I'm talking about. Add medical issues, downsizing your work hours, loss of medical coverage and the inability to keep up with mortgage payments due to paying out-of-pocket for medical bills.....a larger complexity developed. Utility expenses fall behind......you can't afford to repair your 16 year old car so a friend unloads it for you. I haven't even discussed the student loan I owe for well over $40,000 in a career change.
All this to say, a bailout of foreclosures and those approaching foreclosure would help keep people in their homes and not in shelters or forced into living with family, creating other issues. When I started in social services in 1971, the most important needs of my clients were a place to live and a job. Disproportionately women with children and single women are affected in these foreclosure due to the push for minority home ownership in the last five years. Now we, baby boomers who helped shape this country, are caught in the afterglow of the greed of a few on the backs of the many. So as you write policy and consider what type of bailout for who, weigh your consideration for the women who have held this country together in every possible way against the few corporations and the few men who have made greed the new powerball and set this depression in motion.
Here is the link to my prediction of when home values will come back to their highs in 2006:
http://www.t-shirtshopper.com/future_home_values.htm
I based my chart on a historic home price chart I found at http://housingbubble.jparson.net . I expanded the chart to show the historic trajectory of home values in order to predict the home values bottom and when values will recover from the height of the market in 2006. If this chart is correct, it looks like home values and their prices will be corrected sometime in the 1st or 2nd quarter of 2009. That's the good news. The bad news is that anyone that bought a home in 2006, may not see their home values come back until as early as 2029 and as late as 2062. I did this to show just how serious the problem is. There are alot of people that think their home values will come back in just a couple years. I hope I'm wrong, but I wanted to show everyone what I found. If anyone else has data that suggest the contrary please post it on the blog.
Now the only problem I forsee with this law is that banks may end up dictating home prices. That's a big maybe.. I think the reason they require 20% or 10% down is just in case you pay to much for a home. So if you put 20% down and the home is worth 20% less well, the bank wouldn't take that loss. That would be on you. But if it goes beyond the 20%, then the law would state the bank would be required to write down the principle of the loan to the home value minus the 20%. This is only fair that the bank would do this. After all you've already lost everything you put down. You took that much risk. The bank should take the rest.
If anyone has any thoughts or ideas for or against proposed law, please add it to this blog.
I started this blog because I bought a home a few years ago in Las Vegas, when the market was hot and now I've lost so much money on my home I can't even sell it if I want to. If I did I'd probably end up with a net loss of over $100,000. It was my first home. I put nothing down, with a 5 year arm. I have good credit, and so far have not missed any payments. However because the economy in Vegas is getting worse, I'm not sure how much longer I can afford to stay in this home. And since it's not appreciating and doesn't look like the value will be coming back anytime soon, it's looking more and more like a lost cause. I know there are many others in Las Vegas that are in the same situation that I am in, so this blog will be a good place to express your anger toward the banking system and government. I believe they both share in the majority of the blame for the foreclosures. I hear talk that the Govt. is working on it and Obama is planning on doing something, but not much action or specifics as of yet. I'm not sure the government really does have a plan. At least doesn't seem like they have any real good ideas yet. So I started this blog so Americans can post their thoughts themselves and discuss some possible solutions. The foreclosure crisis is the root of all our economic problems and what triggered the recession, so we will not only be solving the foreclosure crisis, but also saving the entire country from meltdown.
I started this blog, because I wanted to talk about my efforts to save my home, and to really just get some thing off my chest.
I finally lost my home to foreclsure sale in June 08, after trying to work with the bank ( countrywide/BOA) for over a year. As a result of this my credit is such that I can't even begin to think about getting a home for at least 5 years. Countrywide and BOA ran me around for over 1 year, just to not help me at all.
I think the problem with all this talk about helping out the homeowners, is that it is up to the bank, they can chose to help or not. If they think that they can get these assest off there books by a sale, or government help, then they are less likely to do anything to help keep the home owner in the house. I found out the hard way that not only do the banks work with each other, so do the courts.
We the homeowner can't win, even if we had money to pay for a lawyer to help us.
WASHINGTON - The number of homeowners ensnared in the foreclosure crisis grew by more than 70 percent in the third quarter of this year compared with the same period in 2007, according to data released Thursday.
By the end of the year, RealtyTrac expects more than a million bank-owned properties to have piled up on the market, representing around a third of all properties for sale in the U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27329406
The full text, two pages, is at http://forteplan.com/obama/foreclosure_solutions.pdf (or .doc)
The basics here:
In the worst case, of an actual foreclosure and title revision/transfer back to the lender, the people stay - the occupants stay - and they become tenants with first option to rebuy in a reasonable contract.
Show me a vacant, run-down, becoming-delapidated house and yard that is selling well !
Show me a neighborhood full of such homes that is working out well for the lender-foreclosure-owners !
Read the outline, and consider that this saves everyone money and stress - AND - it increases and fuels the economy in other ways, for jobs and for businesses that sell things that homeowners, or home occupants and tenants, do buy, but that rats and cockroaches never seem to buy!
Go figure.
(Why are bankers seeming more and more to be so stupid when it comes to financial management and planning?)
Dear Mr. Obama,
I doubt that this letter will ever be read by you or your staff, but I can always hope. I am a registered Republican from the state of Arizona, and I am strongly leaning toward support of you and your campaign.
The reason for my support of your campaign is not so much what you have said during your campaign, but rather what John McCain has said, specifically relating to US Taxpayers buying mortgage backed paper. I feel that this will lead to further financial meltdown and will stabilize home prices, temporarily, at unrealistic, unadjusted levels.
Home prices were due to take a correction. If you couldn’t see the train coming you must have had your head in the sand. Banks and lending institutions should have seen this train coming and applied protective measures necessary to protect themselves and their investors incase of a market correction. Rather, they were making loans that were 125% of the value of the property. This is sheer stupidity, and unfortunately we will all share in the burden of these bad decisions. But we move forward from here.
I feel that McCain’s plan rewards greed and stupidity and guarantees huge debts to future taxpayers. From what I’ve heard from you, I believe you feel the same way. But the big question is… what is the alternative to McCain’s plan?
I realize that I don’t have a grasp of the complexity of the financial engine that drives the US economy. However, I do have a simplified plan on what can be done to stabilize the housing market and at the same time allow a large number of homeowners to remain in their homes with a much smaller downside risk to taxpayers than what McCain is proposing.
It must be noted that very little investor money is entering the residential real estate market due to the unrealistic values that lenders are placing on foreclosed properties. Yet, at the same time, these lenders need to be bailed out by the federal government because they don’t have enough cash to support their day to day operations. I’m sure the lenders believe that if they don’t sell the properties they won’t have to report the losses to their shareholders, but rather can report these investments as unrealistic assets on their books. This is a deception to both current shareholders and investors considering buying equity in the company. Lenders should be required to liquidate their assets at realistic values and take the associated losses, therefore sharing in the burden of this downturn just as all Americans are doing. Liquidating these assets at reasonable prices will give these companies badly needed capital without the help of the federal government’s assistance, will trigger investors to re-enter the residential real estate market, will infuse cash into a cash strapped system, will reduce inventory, and will stabilize home prices at a more reasonable, post-corrected, price point.
Another downside to allowing lenders to hold property is that they don’t maintain the property. Properties owned by banks are left to wilt and fall into disrepair. This leads to urban blight, crime, and causes further erosion in property values.
I speak from experience. We live in Phoenix, Arizona, which was a boon town during the recent building craze. I was recently employed by a civil engineering firm that was directly involved in the development of residential property. Since the onset of the residential real estate downturn I have lost my job and am finding it tough to find another in this business climate. Nevertheless, we purchased a new home in 2006 (prior to me losing my job). At the time of purchase we did not expect home prices to continue to increase at their previous unrealistic pace, (even though I was hoping that they might). I thought that the increase in home prices would decelerate and possibly stagnate. I also thought that there might be a possibility of price retraction. We did not want to be house poor and therefore bought what we could afford. We put a good amount of capital down on the property and therefore are not upside down on our mortgage yet, but we have lost significant equity in the property. We financed the home at a fixed rate for 30 years.
However, a few of our neighbors bought property with the expectation that home prices will continue their unreasonable escalation. Buyer greed was as much a part of this foreclosure disaster as was deception in the mortgage industry, despite what McCain would have you believe.
The neighbors to our west moved here from San Diego. They rented their home in San Diego and purchased a new home in Phoenix. They put in all the bells and whistles, and had a beautiful home with beautiful landscaping and a sparkling pool in their backyard. They also paid a pretty penny for the house and put very little money down. They financed the home with a sub-prime ARM and were probably thinking they could sell the home in a couple years and make a decent profit. On top on this they took out second and third position loans on the property. When the market went south they were immediately underwater. They tried selling the property for what they put into it but there were no takers. The lender refused to work with them on a short sale. Their mortgage rates were going up and they could no longer make their mortgage payments, and since they were already underwater, they had little incentive to make them. The lender foreclosed on the property and they packed up and moved back to San Diego.
The house went up for auction on September 22nd. I kept an eye on the property with assistance from a friend of mine in the real estate industry. He told me that the house did not sell at auction because the opening bid, (by the lender), was too high. So, the property is now lender owned. The water and electricity have been turned off. The plants are dying, the pool is green and the house, I’m sure, is worth less than it was at the time that it went to auction. On top of this there is a very real threat of disease spreading due to mosquitoes breeding in the stagnant water of the pool.
The neighbor to our east moved here from New Jersey. They purchased three homes in the Phoenix area, and currently have lost two. The third will be auctioned on December 23rd. Merry Christmas! The woman has no idea what she will do or where she will live. On top of this she is going through a divorce. Talk about tough! However, they bought all three houses with very little money down and with adjustable rate mortgages. They also took seconds on the properties. If this home is not sold it will wither like the one on our west.
How can we stabilize home prices and keep most homeowners in their houses? My answer may be over simplified, but I think it’s a good solution.
The procedure goes like this…
1. Allow current owners facing foreclosure to go into foreclosure. Everyone shares the burden. People who are not underwater on their mortgages due to prudent decisions, have faced substantial losses in equity. It seems only fair that buyers that made bad decisions lose the equity that they originally had in the property.
2. Persuade lenders sell the property at today’s values and require them to give the first option to buy the property to the original owners prior to selling the property at auction. This will cause the lenders to take a loss on the property as well as allowing a great percentage of homeowners to remain in their homes. Everyone shares the burden. If the government can not persuade the lenders to sell the properties at a loss they can pressurize lenders to do so by passing legislation forcing them pay all taxes and fees associated with the properties as well as a requirement to maintain the properties, thus avoiding the urban blight often associated with bank owned properties. If they fail to follow the rules of the new legislation they can be fined. If they refuse to pay the fines the federal government can acquire the property and can sell it at auction for a fair price. All proceeds from the sale of the property will be used to pay down the tax debt realized during the bailout of the financial market. Allowing these properties to sell at “fair,” post-corrected prices will cause inventory to dry up and should stabilize the market.
3. Because many buyers will have recently faced foreclosure, (as mentioned in paragraph 1, above), they will not be able to qualify for a loan, or if they can qualify, they will be faced with irrationally high interest rates. Therefore, it will be necessary for the federal government to step in and guarantee these mortgages. This will allow for a very safe investment opportunity and will influence investors to once again invest in mortgage backed paper. It will be much less expensive for the tax payer as well due to the fact that private institutions will be funding these loans and the only time federal coffers will be opened is if a loan fails which will be much less often since these loans will be made on post-corrected property values. On top of this, if a loan does fail, the federal government can sell the property to recover the losses. For borrowers to qualify for a government guaranteed loan they will have to meet stringent underwriting requirements established by the federal government. Not everyone will qualify, but people that have faced foreclosures will not be discriminated against in the underwriting process.
The ridiculous notion that home prices need to be stabilized at current prices is a fairy tale. They may be temporarily stabilized, but market pressure, due to an excess of inventory, will cause further downward pressure and eventually a second bubble will burst causing a continued decline in home prices, eventually ending at a price point that the market will bear.
Also, off the subject of housing, and turning to the subject of job creation. I think you should emphasize a vision of the future that supports research in biotechnology. A government investment in research related to finding cures for disease could create thousands of jobs. This sector has been stymied by Bush’s efforts to stop stem cell research.
Good Luck,
You have a lot on your plate.
Sincerely,
Robert Wells
Barack addressed a riled up crowd here in the Sea Gate Convention Center in Toledo, where prior to his appearance, excitement to have him in town (for 4 days!) boiled over into never heard before chants of "We Will, We Will, Barack You!" and "Bye Bye Bush! Bye Bye Bush!" Even during his speech, in this dark but spacious Convention Hall, they hooped and hollered and even stomped on the risers, to thunderous effect. But they paid attention when attention was due, because as Barack says, "These are serious times."
Local Field Organizer Jesse urged everyone in the crowd to not only vote early but vote today, and do their share of the work to reach out to voters, mentioning the "collective power of small action." Senator Sherrod Brown, who has become all but a fixture on campaign stops, mentioned that Lucas County had the potential to be a leader in the alternative energy sector, and it was a common theme throughout the day. A fellow who had been laid off his job for fourteen weeks made an appropriate introduction for Barack, who took this opportunity to roll out the steps of his Rescue Plan for the Middle Class:
The first involves the thing that's on everyone's mind, and it's easy to spell: J-O-B-S. We are going to take a cue from Toledo, which has become a leader in solar panel technology...
The first involves the thing that's on everyone's mind, and it's easy to spell: J-O-B-S.
We are going to take a cue from Toledo, which has become a leader in solar panel technology...
Barack fleshed out the rest of his 4 step plan:
He called on everyone to participate in the fiscal responsibility that Wall Street has so brazenly bucked in the last eight years, and that the nation will need to demonstrate to overcome this crisis:
We have to break that cycle of debt.We have to take responsibility for living within our means.
We have to break that cycle of debt.
We have to take responsibility for living within our means.
As a city that has seen much better days, but never more potential progress, Toledo was the perfect place for Barack to lay the foundation of his plan to rescue America's economy.
Our home owners at both of our properties is going up because of the influx of foreclosures. We are having to take care of the overgrown lawns and the people paying are footing the bill!!!! Can we consider some sort of tax break for HOA groups to offset the costs that home owners are paying for properties under foreclosure?
Drowning in fees !!!
Amy
Apparently, the Republican "plan" isn't good enough.
The verbiage is sketchy, general, and not addressing the real issues here, which is the homeowners who got ripped off. The banks ripped themselves off trying to cheat others to meet their monthly quotas in loan closures.
This draft proposal of Bush's mentions not a damned thing about 'homeowners victimized by sub-prime lending'. It was constructed strictly around the rich lenders and the upper income "taxpayers" who have the bulk of their money invested in REITS and Capital Markets. Again, to protect the upper income sector who got rich ripping off the poor in the first place.
There is no consideration for the poor and the homeowners (according to John McCain that's "anybody making less than five million a year") who got burned in this Bush "bailout plan," not a dime's worth of consideration for them. You'll need to take that one to the people who don't do their homework and didn't see this coming years ago.
***
Sec. 3. Considerations.
In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall take into consideration means for--
(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and
(2) protecting the taxpayer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/business/21draftcnd.html.
This Wall Street market crash, as Pat Robertson and John Hagee would say, must be "god's punishment" upon the rich. And rightfully so.
This bailout plan had better include giving those people who were cheated in the predatory lending market back their money and/or their homes...period. Because Wall Street asking for a $700b welfare check (a reward for screwing up the mortgage industry to prove a -wrongful- point about low income and minority borrowers) isn't going to cut it.
http://www.hud.gov/library/bookshelf12/pressrel/treasrpt.pdf