It is an honor to be nominated let alone win the Nobel Peace Prize. Americans have something to be prideful of because our President was nominated and won! The reasons for the committee's choice are not ours to debate. The nobel prize has been around for years and is a non-partisan award. Throughout the world in the past few years, Americans would travel abroad and not admit to their citizenship. The world hated Americans. Now, our country is being viewed at peace makers and not destroyers. It is something we should hold our head up high in pride.
Already this morning, two hours after the announcement, I was on a social game website and the argument and slander was all over the place. Judging the inaccuracy of the committee's decision and why after nine months in office, President Obama had not changed much. Few things happen overnight. If change is to occur in this struggling economy, it needs to be well planned. President Obama has the framework of many changes ready to enact if Congress would work with him. We have to remember that the President didn't nominate himself for this honor. He was recognized for his leadership in trying to create peaceful relations with all people.
Watch and research for yourself. Start from 2:00:00 hrs and go to about 3:00:00 hrs;
http://rss.nfowars.net/20090903_Thu_Alex.mp3.
What is your take?
"The society's deprivation relies/ not on our differences/ but the separation within."
--Linkin Park, "Frgt/10"
"Watch Your Rights!" (YT's StahrT)
EMK
which one is better for the economy?A healthy population.OrA sick population.And how does that effect productivity, absenteeism, and the economy?
Does extending coverage to another 40 million people create more demand for services and create jobs?
Do incentives for the wealthy to use their health care coverage and increase them result in more services and growth in the medical industry?
Do lowering health care cost result in people having more money to spend which stimulates the economy?
What is the cost or negative impact on the US economy when 1 million families go bankrupt a year?
What is the cost or negative impact on the US economy when a person dies from lack of coverage and what is the dollar value of a person’s life?
Is The root cause of health problems and increasing health care costs in the U.S. due to the U.S. diet (obesity epidemic, heart and stoke, cancer).
Does The deteriorating health of the U.S. population indicate that there has been some kind of failure by the medical community or some kind of contribution to it?
questions are alway a good way to start.
http://politicalpete.com/forum/index.php?topic=2.0
Join and register to the forum and get the debate started. North Korea
http://politicalpete.com/forum/index.php
Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RpfYGrzhqY
Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMY35KZSfhY
Part III: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDTvrgPeRBo
Part IV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CGX_H6cD9U
Part V: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxMbBPHJ7Q8
I can't seem to find my flyswatter! What do you think?
This vid was one I found on a site called Deprogram.net. The vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoA3wHi9iDE, is by a guy from the Center for Global Research known as Michel Chossudovsky. He argues that the current policies + TARP will eat up almost all of the US's GDP (which I've heard is more a service economy rather than a manufacturing economy).
What's your take on this vid after watching it?
Hmm...
In leiu of the Tax Day Tea Parties, as well as the MSM reaction, the Alternative Media reaction, and some politicians' reactions, what do you think about them?
I'm curious. However, feel free to put up any links from any source you like. Also, feel free to scrutenize whatever links you like with a logical argument.
I want an informed, educated discussion, with everyone listening to each other's point of view.
Keep it real, folks!
"The society's deprivation relies/ not on our differences/ but the separation within." --Linkin Park, "Frgt/10"
Ie baahsb shaya hsab
Let's see