There is something MISSING from the pundit’s discussion regarding seating the Michigan delegates.
Regardless of the absence of campaign presence or the preexisting party agreement – neither Edwards nor Obama names appeared on the ballot. How can this be fairly declared as a “Victory” for Hillary??? Obama and Edwards were represented together on the ballot as “UNCOMMITTED”. Many POTENTIAL voters knew this and surely this influenced the turnout. So, how can Hillary seat them???
Further this "disinfranchise" argument is BUNK..... Hillary signed the agreement like everyone else. If she was so "outraged" why did this only become an debateable situation when "she" won!!!! Any ATTEMPT to seat them or change the rules for caucuses would be seen as SNEAKY by the despreately losing Clinton.
Comments are closed for this post.
