Now-a-days with technology and free-speech running rampant, it is kind of hard not to get sucked into comments of what the American people are thinking and feeling right now. Abcnews.com has some wonderful, non-baised articles for people to read, reflect, and then react to. Here are just some of the thoughts that are on the minds of the readers of this website. Some made me chuckle a bit, but this is just to show you all that no matter what the "media" says, America is for the people-by the people...
I hope you all enjoy!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laura said "Bill Clinton is Hillary's husband. He's also a former POTUS. He sides with his wife. That's what husbands are supposed to do."
Yes Husbands are supposed to side with their wifes. Thats how she sided with him while he was in the white house abusing women.
Only a stupid woman could vote for Clinton because she was an accomplice of Bill Clinton raping and abusing women at the white house and yet she claims today she is defending the rights of women. Where was Hillary when Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick were being abused in the white house. Americans wake up.
Posted by: Christian | Jan 17, 2008 1:37:43 AM
The REAL story is all of the endorsements and support (especially from Red State Dems) for Barack Obama since his 2% "loss" in NH. Since last Wednesday the endorsement count is: Clinton–ZERO; Obama…so many it's hard to keep up!
Two more overnight!!
This says that only Obama can unite the country, win in the Red States, and actually get something done for ALL of America…not just the Bush-Clinton-Bush dynasty!
Obama is winning this thing.. DEAL WITH IT
Posted by: Rubiconski | Jan 17, 2008 3:44:17 AM
Nobody could have said it better, Supernova. I am an American living in the Netherlands and that is also what I see. I'll gladly take the 2 hour train to Amsterdam and vote for Obama/Edwards !
Posted by: carmen | Jan 17, 2008 6:51:03 AM
Dang, Bill looks old, doesn't he? I don't think he is aging gracefully.
Anyway, my question is about his claim the the casino votes count FIVE TIMES more. What is the point of that? Wouldn't his argument be more effective if he shared his real concern which is I believe, that those getting to vote where they work are more likely to caucus...and those voting in casinos are more likely to caucus for Barrack. It bugs me that the Clintons are now claiming that the Democratic party in Nevada didn't know what they agreed to when they came up with this plan. Wonder what Harry Reid has to say about all of this?
Posted by: Alox | Jan 17, 2008 8:03:43 AM
Good thing the lawsuit wasn't filed months ago. It's not an accident that once the union decided to go with Obama that it went forward. Bill can set there and say "I didn't have anything to do with it.", but everyone knows he's a huge liar. His wife is too, so they have no credibility to begin with. Had the union chosen to endorse the Clintons, you can bet that no lawsuit would have been filed. Everything the Clintons do is calculated,opportunistic, and dishonest. I'll never vote for a Clinton.
Posted by: TexBork | Jan 17, 2008 8:21:40 AM
It doesn't take too many smarts to know the Clintons are behind this lawsuit fiasco. Good grief, I've said before--they will do ANYTHING to get what they want. Billy acts like a spoiled brat. I can't imagine him "Sticking up" for Hillary. He certainly didn't think of her when he was dabbling with Monica and all the women. And I agree, he is not growing old gracefully. He looks like he could have a stroke any minute. I just cannot and do not have any respect for the CLintons. I am sick of them, too.
Posted by: CS3539 | Jan 17, 2008 9:19:50 AM
This gives us a hint of knowing what the next Clinton presidency would be like. It's not that much different from GW Bush. Disenfranchisement of voters who she might not get the support of because their union endorsed Obama--sounds like another hanging chad/Florida/2004 Ohio Bush maneuver.
The caucus system is not one person one vote....get real. If the Culinary workers had not endorsed Clinton, this lawsuite would never be happening!
Posted by: Peter | Jan 17, 2008 9:25:49 AM
The Clintons didn't oppose the caucus plan when it was first proposed because they never dreamed that someone else could actually get the union endorsement. Her getting that endorsement was just one more stop sign on the road to her coronation. Now that the endorsement has gone to Obama, suddenly the at-large caucuses are a bad idea? To quote the former president himself, "Give me a break!"
Posted by: Jim | Jan 17, 2008 10:17:08 AM
Haha Mighty AMERICA, we are waiting to see who wins the dems presidential nomination: power deperatees, change or a low profile candidate? The least blonder again, u gonna be counting urselves as the "former super power of the world".The world is watching u. Be wise.
Posted by: Eric Appi | Jan 17, 2008 1:30:03 AM
Posted by: VPNNathan | Jan 17, 2008 12:15:16 AM
To answer your question, I would vote for Donald Duck. I would vote for anyone but Hillary......
Don't you think for a minute they wouldn't have a field day with "someone" else too.....
The Clintons are old news. There are two candidates to select from other than Hillary. And if Dems. want to win, they will select anyone but her. Otherwise, it will be a massive blow out because you see, the Clintons have masterfully divided the party.
The only problem is - there will be no coming together come November - that will result in a win for her....
In other words, they, the Clinton's will reap what they sow.....
Posted by: Angela | Jan 17, 2008 12:49:46 AM
hi, gc -- no, friend. i can't do it. i love the democratic party; been voting it for 22 years strong and never missed an election. the clintons are running the party into the ground with their vile campaigning and underhanded tactics. if they're rewarded for it, if more democrats buy the garbage they're peddling (and not just 'cause i believe my choice, barack obama, is peerless in the race) and the clinton co-presidency is what the majority of party members want, there's no way, in good conscience, i could remain a democrat. i'd turn independent the day mrs. c secures the nomination, i swear. it'd break my heart, but hell, that's happened before.
Posted by: sickofitall | Jan 17, 2008 12:38:07 AM
Message to the Show Girls of Las Vegas: Better hide in your closets 'cuz the great Slickster is comin' to town!!!!
Posted by: Rob-is-Right!! | Jan 16, 2008 9:42:06 PM
WHO IS RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY ANYWAY? Hilary Clinton? Or Bill Clinton for an illegal THIRD TERM? . . . . Bill Clinton is using his wife to get another crack at White House interns. . The Clintons' fouling of the White House and undermining of the US Presidency is what cause the nation to have the bungling bush, the UNPROVOKED Iraqi war, the emptying of the national treasury, and the destruction of the economy. . . . The Clintons are self-destructive. THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE!
Posted by: Gobama | Jan 16, 2008 8:15:03 PM
Bill is pressing hard for Hillary. This is not his election but Hillary's. He should understand sensitivities and avoid this very muscular approach which will lead nowhere, all in all this is a fight in the same party. Go Barak, Go, God blessings with you with OForceOne.
Posted by: BKMC | Jan 16, 2008 7:50:51 PM
I kinda enjoyed the one about "OForceOne"........that made me smile.
Again, I did not post this to slam anyone or any idea, just to show you all what the American people have to say. There are alot more "Obamanites" out there tha some of the media outlets would like to admit to.......
>hugs to you all< and keep the home fires burning!!
Comments are closed for this post.
