EFO Blog

Video: Election Night Speech in Grant Park

Christopher Hass — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:06:36 EST

"I will never forget who this victory truly belongs to – it belongs to you." - Barack Obama, Election Night 2008

Read the full speech, as prepared for delivery . . .

Environmentalists Support Barack Obama

George Krebs — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:18:21 EDT

Since the beginning of this campaign, Environmentalists have been excited by Barack’s candidacy. His record on consistently protecting the environment is undeniable. Here is what environmentalists, from the Redwood Forest to the Gulf Stream Waters, are saying about why they’re supporting Barack:

Brett H. from Madison, Wisconsin:

I support Barack Obama for president because he is the only candidate with an inspiring and effective national energy policy that will save us money at the pump, bring us more efficient vehicles and appliances, more clean renewable energy, and clean up old coal plants. He is a the real champion to reduce global warming and will work with local governments on practical solutions, not just supporting drilling more sensitive coast lines and wildlife refuges. I also appreciate his judgment to chose a running mate show shares his values and mine.

Mark H:

I would argue that climate change is the single largest issue for the environment and wildlife. Barack has been the most consistent in expressing the need for a new energy policy and combating global warming. He supports a cap and trade program that will put us on the right path to solving this crisis. I'm confident, as president he will stand up for wildlife and the environment in a bipartisan way and will do more for our cause than any other candidate.

Luke K. from Anchorage, Alaska:

I’m voting for Barack Obama. His vision is evident in his energy policy: I cannot wait for the day when our nation’s energy will come from clean, renewable sources and the kind of revitalization that will provide for our economy, as opposed to having to endure four more years of drilling policies that create more problems than they solve. As an avid sportsmen and backpacker, I’m also concerned for our public lands and wildlife. His commitment to these public resources is unquestioned and is one that recognizes the balancing act between conservation, recreation, and economic development, a balance that has been lacking over the last eight years and one that we can’t afford to lose for four more years.

Brett H. from Madison, Wisconsin:

I support Barack Obama for president because he is the only candidate with an inspiring and effective national energy policy that will save us money at the pump, bring us more efficient vehicles and appliances, more clean renewable energy, and clean up old coal plants. He is a the real champion to reduce global warming and will work with local governments on practical solutions, not just supporting drilling more sensitive coast lines and wildlife refuges. I also appreciate his judgment to chose a running mate show shares his values and mine.

Jack, Chicago:

Barack realized that protecting the environment wasn't just the right thing to do, it was crucial. We are constantly told by the world's leading scientists that we have as little as ten years to drastically change the way we use energy before it becomes irreversible. I think to have a leader of that unique potential has not come across in my lifetime and I don't know when it will again.

With less than a week to go until Election Day, we need to do all we can to help elect Barack. Get involved today.

Environmental & Energy Policy Comparison

George Krebs — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:21:51 EDT

When you line up Obama’s energy plan against McCain’s, the differences are clear. On issue after issue Obama sides with working families and environmentally sensible policies. Just look at the comparison chart below.

League of Conservation Voters Endorses Barack Obama

George Krebs — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:10:17 EDT

In serving its mission to provide factual information about Congressional voting records relating to environmental legislation, the League of Conversation Voters Scorecard gave numerical ratings to both Presidential Candidates. Barack Obama earned a score of 96, the highest rating they gave to a Presidential Candidate all year. John McCain, however, earned a score of 26. You can see the entire score sheet here. On the site you can also see each candidate’s completed questionnaire and a breakdown of their voting record. As his voting record proves, Barack has been a consistent supporter of Environmental issues.

Reason for Change No. 2839

Jack Darin — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:59:50 EDT

It seems every day brings a new reason to make a big change to a real environmental President. Today is no exception. The Wall Street Journal reports today that the Bush Administration has yet another scheme to help dirty power plants avoid installing modern pollution controls. See:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122506399213970419.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#printMode

What is it with these people? Can't they let a bad idea die? Back in 2005, one of Senator Obama's first acts in the U.S. Senate was casting the tie-breaking vote to kill a similar idea - then called the "Clear Skies" act. Barack's leadership stopped the idea back then, but apparently the Bush administration is back at it.

It's been 2839 long days since the Bush-Cheney team took over our environmental policies, only 84 until Barack Obama is sworn in as our next President, and just 7 left for you and I to do anything to influence the outcome of this election. Let's make every one count!

Barack Calls Undecided Colorado Voters

Amanda Scott — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:50:20 EDT

Barack Obama loves making phone calls. If he has time in his busy schedule to make a stop at a local office on the campaign trail, he always stops by to make some phone calls to undecided voters.

This past Sunday he was in Colorado holding Early Vote for Change rallies in Denver and Fort Collins but that didn't stop him from visiting a volunteer office in Brighton.

Contacting voters is one of the most important ways we can reach out to voters during this last week. The McCain campaign is bombarding undecided voters with robocalls full of lies and smears but personal calls from supporters will help spread the truth about Barack's message.

Whether you spend 30 minutes or a couple of hours calling voters, one-on-one conversations could help us win some crucial battleground states. Polls open one week from today. With most battleground states in a tie, your phone calls could make the difference and put Barack over the top.

Yesterday our supporters beat the goal of 100,000 calls by making 124,000. Today, the goal is to contact 125,000 voters.

Call time is 5-9pm local so log on to Neighbor-to-Neighbor and contact undecided voters tonight.

Make History

Christopher Hass — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:47:01 EDT

This afternoon, National Field Director Jon Carson sent out this message to supporters:

Ask your Boss. Ask your Professor.

Take Election Day off and volunteer to make history.
Watch this video and sign up to help get out the vote on Tuesday, November 4th:
This election will be decided by what this grassroots movement can accomplish on Election Day.

We have volunteer shifts to fill throughout the day -- make calls, knock on doors, and make sure your fellow voters get to the polls.

No previous experience is required. Sign up now to take the day off and make history on November 4th.
Thanks,

Jon

Jon Carson
National Field Director
Obama for America

If you live in Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia or Wisconsin, you can sign up now to volunteer in your community.

If you live elsewhere and are willing to travel to a neighboring battleground state to help out, you can sign up here, or you can sign up to make phone calls on Election Day to help Get Out The Vote.

"We can't afford to slow down"

Amanda Scott — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:09:33 EDT

Barack gave his closing argument speech in Canton, Ohio this morning. During his remarks he told voters that this election is not over. That we have to spend the next eight days working as hard as ever because our future depends on next Tuesday.

We have one week to contact voters. One week to spread Barack's message to undecideds. One week to make sure every supporter votes early and brings their friends and family along. One week.

We know we can do it. We can do it because, as Barack said this morning, we've been doing it for 21 months.

We began this journey in the depths of winter nearly two years ago, on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Back then, we didn’t have much money or many endorsements. We weren’t given much of a chance by the polls or the pundits, and we knew how steep our climb would be.

But I also knew this. I knew that the size of our challenges had outgrown the smallness of our politics. I believed that Democrats and Republicans and Americans of every political stripe were hungry for new ideas, new leadership, and a new kind of politics – one that favors common sense over ideology; one that focuses on those values and ideals we hold in common as Americans.

Most of all, I believed in your ability to make change happen. I knew that the American people were a decent, generous people who are willing to work hard and sacrifice for future generations. And I was convinced that when we come together, our voices are more powerful than the most entrenched lobbyists, or the most vicious political attacks, or the full force of a status quo in Washington that wants to keep things just the way they are.

Twenty-one months later, my faith in the American people has been vindicated. That’s how we’ve come so far and so close – because of you. That’s how we’ll change this country – with your help. And that’s why we can’t afford to slow down, sit back, or let up for one day, one minute, or one second in this last week. Not now. Not when so much is at stake.

You can start working for change tonight. Help us by making phone calls to voters across the country. Everyday this week we must contact 100,000 voters daily. We need your help.

Take an hour or two out tonight during call time (5-9pm local) and contact voters. Your phone calls will make the difference one week from now.

Ten Days Out

Christopher Hass — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:45:30 EDT

From the beginning of the general election, strategically, we tried to have as wide of a map as possible. Our belief was we wanted to, on the morning of Nov. 4th, have as many possible avenues to as many electoral votes as possible. And we think we've been able to create that dynamic and have a lot of competitive states in play here. - David Plouffe

national polling averages as of 10/25/08 via pollster.com

With only ten days left, it's become apparent just how wide the election map is. But as the number of competitive states grows larger, so to does the universe of voters that we have to identify, persuade and get to the polls. Now more than ever, we are relying on volunteers in every corner of the country to help execute the field plan we've built over the last 20 months.

Jen O'Malley Dillon, the battleground states director, explained:

We have expected all along that this race is going to tighten up, especially in the battlegrounds states. So we have spent a lot of time building our organizational strengths, building capacity and really focusing on our voter contact and our neighborhood organizations. We really feel that in a number of these states, this election is going to come down to our ground organization and what happens in the final days of the campaign.

In almost two dozen key states, the outcome is very much still up in the air. Over the next ten days, you have an unprecedented opportunity to be part of this effort and to contribute directly to the outcome of this election.

If you live in or near one of the many battleground states, you can connect with a local office and help our field operation on the ground. Face-to-face contact is the most powerful way to get out the vote or persuade undecided voters in battleground states. Sign up today -- state staff are waiting for your help.

This weekend, we're counting on our grassroots phonebankers to make an additional 300,000 calls to voters in key states. As of 7:00 PM Central tonight, you've already made 113,762 calls. Right from your own home, on your own schedule, you can do your part in just an hour or two by calling voters in one of these crucial states. We'll give you the phone numbers and the talking points. It couldn't be easier. You can get your list of targeted voters to call right now.

Finally, supporters will be coming together on Wednesday, October 29th, to watch Barack's national TV appearance and call voters in battleground states. Talking one-on-one with potential fellow voters is one of the easiest and most effective ways for you to make an impact in this election. Find a Last Call for Change house party near you or sign up to host one.

As National Field Director Jon Carson said in an email sent out to supporters tonight, each passing day is an opportunity we'll never have again to change America. You hold this election in your hands.

Polls close in 10 days.

Vote for Barack Today

Amanda Scott — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:24:11 EDT

Early voting has started in over half the states already. Barack and Michelle both held early vote rallies in Florida earlier this week. Joe held early vote rallies in Colorado, and Jill will be holding early vote rallies in Florida this weekend.

Early voting is an easy way to help the campaign. You secure your vote for Barack, you help the campaign narrow the universe of voters that we have to contact, and you free yourself up to help recruit others to vote. We will be spending a massive amount of time and money on our Get Out The Vote effort, and we need more volunteers than ever before.

Barack is in Nevada today to reminded supporters to vote early. And earlier this week he was in Indiana...

If you live in Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Iowa, Indiana, Wisconsin, Ohio, Montana, New Mexico, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Georgia, West Virginia, Oregon, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Texas, Tennessee, Hawaii, Illinois, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Louisiana, Kansas, New Jersey, or Idaho, early voting has begun. Vote for Barack today.

Last Call: This Weekend

Christopher Hass — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:20:38 EDT

National Phonebank Coordinator Nicole Aro sent out this message to supporters tonight:

In crucial battleground states like Ohio, Florida, and Virginia, the race is neck-and-neck.

This weekend, you can help Barack get ahead.

In every corner of the country, friends and neighbors are coming together for Last Call for Change phonebanks to call potential supporters in battleground states.

There may be one right near you. All you need to do is bring a cell phone -- and some friends -- and we'll take care of the rest.

Find a local Last Call for Change phonebank and make a difference this weekend.

With Election Day just around the corner, swing voters are getting bombarded with the McCain campaign's lies and distortions.

It's more important than ever that supporters like you reach out and share the truth about Barack one-on-one. You can also let voters in battleground states know about important early voting opportunities.

It's a great opportunity to get together with friends and fellow supporters and, at the same time, make a difference in a crucial state.

Find a phonebank near you and sign up today.

Together, we can reach millions of voters, generate historic turnout, and win this election.

Thanks,

Nicole

Nicole Aro
National Phonebank Coordinator
Obama for America

Voices for Change: Phillip in McGregor, Iowa

Molly Claflin — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:06:37 EDT

Philip is a 59-year-old dairy farmer in McGregor, Iowa. He’s also a fervent Obama supporter.

“I support him because of the way he carries himself,” Philip says. “Obama has the perfect temperament and judgment for the job of president. He’s the kind of person that if things get tense, you know he’s the one everyone else in the room would look to. He’s a natural leader.”

Philip has not only donated to the campaign, but volunteered by walking neighborhoods in McGregor and registering everyone he can to vote.

I try to be part of the team. I set a personal goal of getting 100 new votes for the Democrats. It sounds simple – but that’s a lot! I plan to knock on about 1500 doors to do it. And when I’m at the gas pump or at the grocery store or in line at the post office, I always ask people if they’re registered to vote, and talk to them about Obama. I carry voter registration forms with me wherever I go.

Philip lives with his wife of 34 years on a 495-acre farm that’s also home to 170 dairy cows. Philip, who likes to hunt and fish in his spare time, is especially proud of his son who is a senior at Louisiana State University.

He says the recent flooding in the Midwest is still one of the biggest problems in his home town.

There’s lots of flood damage in our county. Whole neighborhoods were wiped out and there’s no rebuilding yet. The floods made me really concerned about global warming. I want my government working on that! But I know Obama’s concerned about global warming as well.

Philip says that energy is another major concern in his part of Iowa.

Our economy is terrible right now. But at lot of farmers see renewable energy – like ethanol -- as a way to revitalize our rural economy. McCain opposes ethanol, but Barack has said he wants to renew the rural economy through renewable energy. I think he can make a big difference for a lot of people out here by investing in renewable energy.

Barack has a plan to end America's dependence on foreign oil by investing in renewable alternatives like wind, solar, clean coal andd ethanol. The Obama-Biden plan will not only help build the ecconomy in rural communities, but these alternative energy sources will provide more than 5 million well-paying American jobs. Read more about Barack's energy plan.

Join Philip and make a difference in your community by contributing to the Obama movement for change.

Voices for Change is a series featuring profiles of Barack Obama's grassroots supporters from across the nation. The people who make up this movement come from all different backgrounds, but they share a common goal of helping bring about fundamental change in Washington.

Joe Biden in Charleston, WV: "We have to unite this country"

Amanda Scott — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:00:53 EDT

Joe Biden spoke to residents of Charleston, West Virginia this morning. He spoke to attendees about clean coal and working through this economic crisis.

Barack and I believe clean coal is part of our energy future. That’s why we supported adding $200 million in funding for carbon capture and sequestration technology. Instead of pouring our energy dollars into the sands of Saudi Arabia and the pockets of Venezuela, we should be exporting home-made technology – solving not only our own energy challenges, but the worlds. We need to make an investment in rebuilding America’s infrastructure – including broadband and the infrastructure of the future. Our plan that we estimate will create 12,000 jobs here in West Virginia alone. This is about jobs. But in a sense, it’s about even more than jobs. It’s about dignity. It’s about respect. It’s about understanding what people are going through. When a job is lost or a house is foreclosed on, it’s not just an economic loss… it’s emotionally devastation. It’s about having to make that long walk up that short flight of stairs…That’s something I’ve experienced. At the end of the day, if we want to strengthen the middle class and regain our respect in the world, we have to do one thing more: We have to unite this country.
...Great presidents have always turned dire circumstances into real opportunities…by reminding Americans of what we’ve overcome in the past, and appealing to our better angels. And I believe Barack Obama will be a great president. My father always told me “Champ, when you get knocked down, get up. Get up.”
I’ve never seen a time when more Americans have been knocked down. It’s time for us to get up, together, and bring the change we need…to the country we love. America is ready. You are ready. I am ready. And Barack Obama is ready. It is our time.

Continue reading for excerpts of Joe's remarks, as prepared for delivery...

New to the site or still undecided? Learn more about Barack Obama and his position on important issues. If you're already a supporter, find out what you can do to help between now and Election Day, and please consider making a donation to strengthen our field operation and help Get Out The Vote.

Volunteer Victory

Amanda Scott — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:05:12 EDT

Every day we put off getting involved is another day lost. Every day we work harder than the day before is a day won. The only way we are going to win this election is our field work -- our on the ground organizing.

The most important election of our lifetime will come down to how many volunteers get involved over the next 12 days. Watch this volunteer video from Michigan -- and remember what four years ago felt like.

We can bring change to Washington. We can win this election -- but we can't do it by sitting on the sidelines. You can contact voters from home, volunteer at your local campaign office, knock on doors, travel to battleground states and make sure everyone you know votes early.

Visit your state page to see how you can help our Get Out The Vote effort. Your time connecting with voters could make the difference on November 4.

Energy: Side By Side

Amanda Scott — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:01:36 EDT

Unsure about the differences between Barack Obama and John McCain's energy plans? Check out the side by side comparision below...

"Do something to help make it happen"

Molly Claflin — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:32:03 EDT

It’s hard to believe there are only a few weeks left before Election Day. Countless Obama supporters are out in the field working hard to bring change. They're phonebanking, canvassing, talking to their neighbors and, in some states, registering voters before state deadlines close.

And they're making a difference.

Here are just a few of their stories:

Gwen in Virginia:

I spent a beautiful day outdoors yesterday, canvassing for Obama in Fluvanna County. We covered a lot of houses, and right when we were about to go home, we talked to one more person because I called out to him instead of turning around and leaving at the “Beware of Dog” sign. This led to a conversation that brought some joy to an elderly man’s day and may result in one more vote. If having volunteers come to your door helps emphasize the importance of the election and increases the likelihood of your voting, then we accomplished that too.

If you want Obama to win, and you are concerned that he won’t, do something to help make it happen.

Kim and Jody in Indiana:

We had an amazing time canvassing today in Chesterton, Indiana. Very enthusiastically Obama!

Tamara in Pennsylvania:

I went canvassing for the campaign with my husband and two kids. We met a kid and his mother on the way out the door. She sat down on the porch while my kids picked her dandelions and my husband and I spoke to her. This stay-at-home soon-to-be grandma Navy veteran was Obama all the way. Though we did not get her pinned down to a volunteer shift she did know where to go and knew someone that was. I left hopeful that she would.

And if you want to see just how much America needs change just knock on some doors! Change comes from the roots and it only happens when we rise up to the challenge.

Don’t sit on the sidelines. You can join Gwen, Kim, Jody and Tamara. Get involved in your community today and make a difference in November.

Special Video from Barack

Christopher Hass — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:18:16 EDT

This morning, the campaign sent out the following message to supporters, along with a link to a special video from Barack. . .

Election Day is exactly two weeks from today.

But right now, we're facing an urgent deadline that will determine exactly where we can compete -- and how fiercely -- in the final push.

Barack recorded a special video message about why your support is so vital before this Thursday at midnight.

Will you watch the video and make a donation before the deadline?

On Friday morning, we have to make the final, hard decisions about deploying our resources.

Your support will determine how hard we can fight in key battleground states -- and if we can expand our operation into some newly competitive states in the final days.

What began in Springfield, Illinois, more than 20 months ago will reach its peak on Tuesday, November 4th.

We know what we need to do to win. But it's up to you whether or not we have the resources to fight hard and expand our reach.

Thank you for all you've done to bring the campaign this far. Will you watch Barack's message and make a donation before Thursday at midnight?

Thank you for everything you're doing,

Obama for America

Make Calls Tonight

Amanda Scott — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:32:35 EDT

One-on-one conversations with voters could be what wins the election for Barack. A lot of voters are still undecided and need to know the change Barack is going to bring to Washington.

Most importantly, they need to know why you support Barack. By taking the time to talk to someone and tell them your story you could persuade someone to vote for Barack.

One of the easiest ways to talk to other people is by using our online Neighbor-to-Neighbor tool. This allows you to call voters in battleground states and talk to them about the issues you care about. Whether it's the economy, education, social security or the war in Iraq, many other Americans are struggling and facing the same situations that you are. Tell them why you are voting for Barack and how we can fix the problems this country is facing.

Volunteers in Wisconsin recently recorded a short video with some tips on how to phonebank. It's simple and easy, even if you've never phonebanked before.

Call time (suggested time to call voters) is Monday thru Friday 5-9pm local time.

What are you doing tonight?

Take some time out to call voters and tell them about Barack. There are only 15 days left to win the election. As Barack says, keep pushing toward the finish line.

Colorado Energy Tour: The Campaign for Change visits New Belgium

Jenn Prosser — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:13:10 EDT

On Monday, the Colorado Campaign for Change RV, equipped with solar panels, again took the road -- this time on a statewide energy tour. On the RV were Governor Bill Ritter and former Secretary of Transportation and Energy, Frederico Pena.

The morning started off in Fort Collins where they were joined by Denver Mayor and former brewery owner John Hickenlooper for a tour of the New Belgium brewery. New Belgium is the third largest mid-sized brewery in the United States and is known as a model of sustainability and eco-friendly practices. In 1999, New Belgium became the largest private consumer of wind-power electricity at that time and the first wind-powered brewery in the country.

At the end of the tour, Mayor Hickenlooper praised the brewery and explained why how New Belgium is an example of the kind of companies that Barack supports and will continue to support when he is president.

He said:

Imagine a country where you have a leader in place who has that same sort of sense about the need to transform our country, the need to do it with respect to both how we consume and how we produce and understands the opportunities that are a part of that. It's not built of desperation or a lack of hope, it's built out of a sense of an ability to create jobs and create a different energy future, to create a different economy and at the same time be responsible stewards of the environment.

You guys have definitely done it here at the New Belgium brewery, there are companies doing it around America and what we badly need is a leader in Washington D. C. who will partner with the states and develop a new energy economy in this country. So that's one of the reasons why I so heartily embrace Barack Obama's campaign for presidency because I believe he has the vision for that new energy economy.

Here are some more photos from the first stop of the energy tour:

On Great Lakes Issues the Choice is Clear

Lauren Rosenthal — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:25:50 EDT

Read this piece from the Associated Press comparing the commitment of the candidates on Great Lakes restoration and preservation:

Restoring Great Lakes becomes a campaign issue

By JOHN FLESHER – 2 days ago

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — The Great Lakes are ailing, scientists warn, on the verge of ecological ruin from big-city sewage and invasive species. Presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama promise to support restoration and cleanup, yet the nation's financial crisis calls into question how those efforts will be funded.

Advocates for the lakes region are begging the next president to support a rescue plan expected to cost more than $20 billion. They liken it to the Florida Everglades restoration that Congress approved eight years ago — and it, too, is struggling for lack of money.

"The current economic crisis is even more of a reason why both candidates should articulate comprehensive, detailed Great Lakes cleanup commitments," said Jeff Skelding, national campaign director for the Healing Our Waters-Great Lakes Coalition. "Investment in cleanup of the lakes is also an investment in a healthy regional economy."

The Great Lakes region includes crucial states in the presidential race: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Minnesota and Wisconsin. The McCain and Obama campaigns agree that the Great Lakes need help but argue over the approach.

While campaigning for re-election in 2004, President Bush established an interagency task force that oversaw development of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration Strategy. It called for upgrading wastewater and sewage treatment systems, stemming the exotic species tide, restoring wetlands and wildlife habitat and cleaning up toxic sediments. But the administration provided little money.

Obama, an Illinois senator, said last month that McCain had "stood with Bush" in failing to support adequate spending on the lakes. The Democrat, whose home city of Chicago anchors Lake Michigan's southern shore, released a five-point plan featuring a $5 billion "down payment" toward implementing the restoration.

McCain's campaign said the Obama plan "throws taxpayers' money at the problem." Yet aides said the Republican senator from Arizona also supports the restoration, although he has put forward no detailed plan or spending commitment. Obama is a co-sponsor of legislation to implement the restoration; McCain is not.

"The Great Lakes restoration must be a bipartisan initiative that brings on board all regions of the country in supporting the lakes as a national treasure," McCain campaign spokeswoman Sarah Lenti said in a written statement.

Robert Sisson, a national staffer with Republicans for Environmental Protection, said McCain's support of the lakes was sincere. But the budget crisis makes any specific funding pledge at this point an empty gesture, he said.

McCain is trying to have it both ways, said Heather Zichal, Obama's energy and environmental policy director.

"If John McCain is saying this restoration can take place without a significant federal contribution, he's just paying lip service when he claims to support it," Zichal said.

She acknowledged that money would be tight. But hailing from a Great Lakes state, Obama understands the lakes' dire situation and would give them top billing, Zichal said.

"You don't have to explain to a Great Lakes senator why this should be a priority," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. "It's in our DNA."

Obama's plan also calls for appointing a Great Lakes czar within the Environmental Protection Agency to coordinate efforts on the federal, state and local levels.

Other proposals include stepped-up efforts to identify and reduce toxic pollution, promote water conservation and crack down on ship ballast discharges responsible for most of the 185 invasive species that threaten the lakes' ecosystem.

The Great Lakes system holds 90 percent of the nation's surface fresh water. Yet it's under assault from sewage overflows in cities such as Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee. One study warned that the lakes were reaching a "tipping point" where they might be unable to heal themselves from pollution.

A recent University of Notre Dame report said invasive species arriving in the ballast tanks of cargo ships cost the regional economy $200 million a year. The most feared potential invader is the Asian carp — a 100-pound eating machine that gorges on plankton, an essential component of the aquatic food web.

Obama has pledged to finish construction of an electronic barrier in Chicago to keep the carp from invading Lake Michigan from the Illinois River. Biologists say if the carp gains a foothold in the lakes, it would be catastrophic for the region's $4 billion fishing industry.

In 2006, Obama inserted $400,000 for the barrier into an emergency bill for the Iraq war and hurricane relief. Additional money was included in a 2007 package for water projects enacted over Bush's veto. Obama supported the override, while McCain sided with the president.

McCain's campaign described the $23 billion measure as a budget buster, loaded with "pork barrel projects that only benefit individual congressmen and their districts." Obama's campaign said McCain's opposition showed he wasn't serious about supporting the lakes.

Obama favors restoring federal authority to protect wetlands and other waterways that was eroded by Supreme Court rulings in two cases from the Great Lakes region during the Bush years, Zichal said. Scientists say loss of wetlands is a serious threat to the lakes, where they filter toxins and provide fish spawning areas.

The McCain campaign did not respond to a question about his position on that issue.

Another reason we love Obama

Lauren Rosenthal — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:52:21 EDT

BUSH SIGNS INTO LAW OBAMA-MURKOWSKI-ALLEN BILL TO BAN DANGEROUS MERCURY EXPORTS

Law will protect millions of pregnant women and children by removing a significant amount of mercury from the global market

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Representative Tom Allen (D-ME), and Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today announced that President Bush signed into law the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (S.906), a bipartisan bill introduced in March 2007 to ban the export of mercury from the United States. The United States is consistently ranked as one of the world's top exporters of mercury, a substance that, when ingested, can lead to learning disabilities and physical ailments. This law will remove a significant amount of mercury from the global market and lessen the threat this substance poses to the world’s most vulnerable citizens. Obama and Murkowski introduced this bill in the Senate and Representative Allen introduced companion legislation in the House of Representatives. This bill is also cosponsored by Senators Joseph Biden (D-DE), Carl Levin (D-MI), and Ken Salazar (D-CO).

“The President’s approval of this bipartisan bill is an important victory for millions of the world’s most vulnerable citizens who are exposed to the harmful effects of mercury every day,” said Senator Obama. “Exposure to mercury leads to serious developmental problems in children as well as problems affecting vision, motor skills, blood pressure, and fertility in adults. Despite our country’s improved efforts to contain and collect mercury over the years, we remain one of the world’s leading exporters of this dangerous product, so I am proud this bill will finally ban mercury exports. I commend Senator Murkowski, Congressman Allen, and Chairman Boxer for working in a bipartisan way with industry and environmental groups to put the health of pregnant women and children first.”

“I am pleased that President Bush has signed this important legislation which will slow needless mercury emissions, especially in the developing world,” said Senator Murkowski. “Given our expanding knowledge about the health impacts of elemental mercury when it enters the atmosphere, it only makes sense to take reasonable steps now to safeguard the environment from the release of mercury that can affect fish and potentially those who eat fish.”

“This legislation will eliminate a key source of mercury from reaching the global market,” said Representative Allen. “Mercury is a potent neurotoxin hazardous to human health, especially for infants, children, and women who are pregnant or nursing. Maine people should be able to eat the fish they purchase in the supermarkets. We still have much to do to end mercury pollution, and I will continue to fight for passage of my legislation to establish a nationwide mercury pollution monitoring system and the legislation I support requiring utilities to reduce their mercury emissions.”

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said, “The Mercury Export Ban of 2008, just signed into law, will protect millions of pregnant women and children from toxic mercury pollution. I greatly appreciate Senator Obama’s leadership in this successful bipartisan effort.”

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause serious developmental problems in children, ranging from severe birth defects to mental retardation. As many as 630,000 children born annually in the U.S. are at risk of neurological problems related to mercury. In adults, mercury can negatively affect vision, motor skills, blood pressure and fertility. As many as 10 percent of women in the U.S. of childbearing age have mercury in their blood at a level that could put a baby at risk.

The Mercury Export Ban Act will:

• Prohibit the commercial export of elemental mercury from the United States in 2013.

• Prohibit the commercial sale or transfer of federal mercury stockpiles held by the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense for any purpose except for transfer into permanent storage.

• Provide for permanent storage of collected mercury by the Department of Energy.

This legislation is supported by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Council of the States, American Chemistry Council, the National Mining Association, and the Chlorine Institute.

###

Please Attend This Indianapolis Event!

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:37:03 EDT

Children’s Health & Environment

Roundtable

Wednesday October 15

6:00-7:00 pm

Forest Dale Elementary School, Carmel

10721 W Lakeshore Dr, Carmel IN

Join environmental science & policy experts to discuss
Obama’s plans to protect Indiana’s children by rebuilding
America’s environmental frameworks

Prof. Maria Lopez

Dr. Gabe Filippelli

Prof. Eric Dannenmaier

“We cannot afford more of the same timid politics when the future of our planet is at stake. ... .

This is not the future I want for my daughters. It's not the future any of us want for our

children. And if we act now and we act boldly, it doesn't have to be.”

- Barack Obama, Portsmouth, NH, 10/8/07

More information at www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/

Sponsored by the Hamilton County Democratic Central Committee

“This nation can and must do more to protect and promote the health of children.”

o Senator Obama has been a strong supporter of expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program

(CHIP) to cover more uninsured children.

o During his first year in office, Obama successfully fought to get the Environmental Protection Agency to

publish long-overdue rules for how home contractors should deal with lead paint hazards.

o Obama is an original cosponsor of the Home Lead Safety Tax Credit Act, which would provide tax

credits to property owners who eliminate or contain paint hazards in homes where low-income young

children or women of child-bearing age live

o Obama introduced the Attacking Viral Influenza Across Nations Act, calling for cooperation at the

state, national, and international level to ensure preparedness in the event of pandemic influenza.

- for more information: http://obama.senate.gov/issues/health_care/

If You Vote Based on Energy or Climate Change Your Choice is Clear

Lauren Rosenthal — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:36:34 EDT

When you look at the presidential candidates, one area where they differ starkly is energy and the environment. These differences sometimes get lost in the rhetoric, but are striking and clearly highlight why it is vital to our future that we elect Obama. Over the coming days we will point out some of those very real differences, For today, please read the editorial from the New York Times copied below:

October 12, 2008EDITORIALUp and Down the Learning Curve

The cramped rules of the presidential debates and the McCain campaign’s descent into content-free name-calling mean that voters are unlikely to hear the serious debate about energy issues they need and deserve.

Still, we have heard enough to know that there are big differences between John McCain and Barack Obama. We have also heard enough to know that Mr. Obama promises a much more robust and adventurous approach to the two big energy-related problems of the age: oil dependency and climate change.

Mr. Obama also keeps moving up the learning curve on energy issues, whereas Mr. McCain seems to regress. This is important because energy problems are varied and complex, and solving them will require leaders with restless curiosity and an open mind.

Not too long ago, Mr. Obama seemed infatuated with the environmentally risky idea of converting coal to gasoline. He dropped it when scientists pointed out that unless ways could be found to capture the carbon emissions, the conversion process would add to global warming. As recently as two months ago, Mr. Obama was pandering to voters with short-term fixes for gas prices like tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

His present strategy is coherent and farsighted. Mr. Obama says he would limit carbon emissions with a strong cap and trade program, invest heavily in alternative energy sources, raise federal fuel-economy standards and require that 10 percent of America’s energy be generated by renewable sources by 2012. He would help Detroit develop more fuel-efficient cars with loans and tax credits, and — to the annoyance of some environmentalists — he rightly includes nuclear energy as part of the mix.

In last week’s debate, Mr. McCain said airily that he would do “all of the above.” But within minutes he had reaffirmed that the centerpiece of his strategy is to drill for more oil, mainly in previously off-limits areas of the outer continental shelf.

This politically seductive idea is flawed on three counts. It will not provide short-term relief to gas prices. It will make a minimal long-term contribution to America’s energy needs. And it ignores a fundamental truth that Mr. Obama confronted squarely in the debate: a nation using one-fourth of the world’s oil production while owning only 3 percent of the world’s reserves cannot drill its way to energy independence.

Mr. McCain’s other big idea — nuclear power — also promises too much. Both candidates agree that because nuclear power is carbon-neutral it has to be part of any serious effort to reduce global warming. But in the debate Mr. McCain glossed over formidable problems of cost, safety and waste disposal, meanwhile suggesting that the public was clamoring for nuclear power and that dozens of plants could pop up practically overnight.

The old John McCain — the McCain who pressed to sharply increase fuel efficiency, the early and brave advocate of putting a price on carbon emissions — has all but disappeared from view.

The saddest evidence of that was his choice of Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska as his running mate. Astonishingly, he claims that Ms. Palin “knows more about energy than probably anyone in the United States,” and if Ms. Palin is to be believed, he has more or less anointed her as his energy czar.

Ms. Palin’s strategy is frighteningly simplistic: drill for more oil. Any doubt on that score was erased in the vice presidential debate, when she delightedly corrected Senator Joseph Biden about the party’s new slogan. He had complained that the Republicans stood for “drill, drill, drill.” No, she said, it’s “drill, baby, drill.”

It is true that nearly every Alaska politician likes to drill for oil; it is the source of much of the state’s income. But no other Alaska politician is this close to the presidency. Meanwhile, Ms. Palin continues to express doubts about the human causes of climate change. Her insistence, in the debate, that she didn’t “want to argue about the causes” was also alarming.

Unless we recognize the human causes of climate change, the essential changes in the way this country and others produce and consume energy are unlikely to happen. The old, pre-Sarah-Palin, John McCain knew that.

Gov. Angus King Addresses Maine's Energy Issues

Liz -Maine HQ — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:00:00 EDT

All this week, Governor Angus King has been meeting with community members to speak about our mounting energy problems and how Barack Obama's energy plan will offer real solutions to Maine.

Governor King in Bangor

Addressing the Crowd in Waterville

Students Interview Gov. King After the Speech

Governor King attended an event in Bangor on Monday, and will be in South Paris tonight.

Yesterday, after speaking with Waterville area residents, Governor King joined supporters and the Campaign for Change to watch the Second Presidential Debate.

Tonight’s debate showed that that we have a choice between a candidate who is offering real solutions to the challenges Mainers face, and one who is trying to change the subject...

As we saw tonight, the differences are clear: Barack Obama will cut taxes for the middle class, invest in clean, affordable energy, and provide health care for all. John McCain will tax our health benefits for the first time in history, while giving more tax breaks to the oil and gas companies.

There is less then four weeks to go until Election Day, make a difference in your local community and sign-up to get involved today.

Deadline: Register to Vote Today

Amanda Scott — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:17:33 EDT

Monday, October 6th is the deadline to register in 17 states.

No matter where you live, if you have three minutes to spare, you can check your registration status, register to vote, request an absentee ballot, and find your early voting site or polling location at VoteForChange.com.

In 2004, George Bush won Nevada by less than 2.5% of voters, New Mexico by less than 1% of voters, and Colorado by less than 100,000 votes. In Ohio, Bush won by just over 100,000 votes -- less than 10 votes per precinct.

This time, we can't leave anything to chance.

This is your choice: three minutes spent registering to vote -- or four years spent wishing that you had.

Even if you are registered, you likely know someone who isn't.

If you have friends or family who support Barack but might not be registered to vote, you can use our online form to let them know about VoteForChange.com. A simple message from you could be the difference between them voting and them staying at home on November 4th.

And that could be the difference in this election.

Eric from Indiana supports Barack!

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:23:52 EDT

I support Barack Obama because he has the vision to achieve US energy independence; the integrity to rebuild environmental protections dismantled over the past eight years; and the demonstrated leadership to reach across the partisan divide to represent the entire American public. I have spent more than twenty years as an advocate for sound energy and environmental policy and an advisor teaching about long-term sustainable development. I began working on energy policy while I was still in college in Missouri, and now continue my work as an environmental law professor in Indiana. I recognize the importance of preserving and expanding jobs even while we develop energy alternatives and protect public health and the environment; this is a need that people in the Midwest understand better than most. Meeting this need calls for innovation and cooperation, and Barack Obama is a proven coalition builder and leader. From the time he was a community organizer and state Senator in Illinois, Obama has moved beyond the special interests and animosity of the past. He has offered detailed energy and environmental policies that will move our country forward after too many years of delay. I trust him to lead a new administration that will value – just as we in the Midwest value – good jobs, energy independence, and environmental sustainability.

Conservation Day of Action in WI!

Jack Darin — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:24:46 EDT

October 1st was "Conservationist Day of Action" at the Madison, Wisconsin campaign office. Local environmental leaders and activists hit the streets for some fall "urban hiking" to reach infrequent and undecided Madison-area voters with our message of change.

I spoke to the crowd about Barack's New Energy For America plan, and how we can draw stark contrasts to McCain's lack of any real strategy to create jobs in the new energy economy, and his long record of opposing clean energy in the Senate.

I thought McCain said it best in last week's debate, when he said "We have to have wind, tide, solar, natural gas, flex fuel cars and all that (emphasis added) but we also have to have offshore drilling and we also have to have nuclear power." He then went on to focus on all the jobs he would create building 45 new nuclear power plants.

if you remember seeing it live, his tone and emphasis made it very clear that his energy priorities are oil and nuclear - choices that won't help Wisconsin farmers fuel our cars, won't retool Wisconsin auto plants to build the cleaner cars Americans want to buy, and won't put assembly lines and electricians to work building windmills and retrofitting our economy to save energy. Barack's plan chooses the resources, ingenuity, and people of the heartland over the big companies that got us into this mess in the first place.

It was great to see the environmental community getting involved in changing our country, one door at a time, in Wisconsin. Keep up the great work - 33 days to go!

www.NewEnergyForAmerica.com

Jack Darin

E&E Team

Help Get Out The Vote

Lauren Rosenthal — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:00:43 EDT

If you care about the environment, energy independence or conservation then please spend some time this month helping to get out the vote. People are already voting in 8 states.

Check out this great video called Come to Ohio (it's less than 3 minutes). Thanks Rosie Goldensohn for posting the video and doing such a great job getting volunteers to Ohio!

Share this video--Come to Ohio

Tell your friends!

http://oh.barackobama.com/ohcometoohio

If you live far from Ohio or travel is just not in the cards for you this month, go to the Action Center (see Action tab at the top of this page) and find the way to volunteer that best suits you.

Thank you for what you have done and are going to do! Let's make an Obama presidency a reality.

Missouri Energy Independence Tour: "We took our time with this, made sure we did it right"

John Schueler — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:49:38 EDT

“When we started this thing, no bank would give us a loan.”

Steve Flick, the director of the Show-Me-Energy Cooperative in Centerville, Missouri, stated that as walked past an assembly line filled with plastic bags. These bags escalated towards a spout that would soon fill them with fuel pellets. These tiny pellets, about the size of an apple stem, might look unremarkable at first glance but the energy they possess could be a huge step towards energy independence.

“We took our time with this, made sure we did it right… All of our pellets are produced from things that would normally be tossed away and considered waste.” The biomass fuel pellets are made from non-grain bearing crops of cellulose like switch grass, cornstalks, cereal straws, fescue straw and other agricultural residues or energy crops that have no food value. This allows the farmers involved to generate additional revenue from the crops and plants they were already growing. The pellets themselves can be used in furnaces to heat homes, and have also been utilized to generate electricity. That’s an exciting development that with the proper funding and research could have large applications moving forward.

Dan Kammen, a renowned energy specialist and advisor to the Obama campaign, was impressed by the operation. “It seems you really took the whole picture into account here. ‘Cradle to Grave’ carbon output especially, which is something that Senator Obama wants to make standard.” He marveled at some of their practices, such as avoiding the use of water in adhesion and asked what Steve felt the government could do to help advance these sorts of technologies. Steve looked up at the whirring machinery and harkened back to his earlier statement about financial backing.

Not only did we work alongside University of Missouri in Rolla to develop this technology… We were also lucky enough to get some government grants and subsidies to make this a reality. Without that, this never may have happened. So we need a president and a government body that sees the long term value in what we’re doing, and is willing to make those investments.

Care about Renewable Energy? Obama is your man

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:08:59 EDT

One of the reasons I supported Barack Obama's candidacy early on is that I knew him to be a leading supporter of Renewable Energy while he was a state legislator here in Illinois. His commitment to the environment is genuine and long standing.

While watching the debate last night, I was so happy to hear Sen. McCain declare that: "No one can be opposed to alternate energy, no one." Naturally, I understand that we cannot prevail on environmental issues unless we bring in new supporters every day. I welcome Sen. McCain's support for renewable energy. But, I am not sure I can believe it. His actions do not reflect that position.

Read the facts below and know that it is time for Change.

*THE FACTS:* *MCCAIN HAS VOTED AT LEAST 23 TIMES AGAINST INVESTMENTS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY*

1. *1992: McCain Voted Against Proceeding On A Vote On The 1992 E nergy Bill. *McCain voted against proceeding to the bill to encourage energy conservation and increase domestic energy production. [1992 Senate Vote 150, 7/23/1992] 1. *1999: McCain Voted Against Funding for Renewable Energy Programs. *McCain opposed an amendment that would increase funding for energy supply and research and development activities for renewable energy sources by reducing unnecessary Energy Department contractor travel expenses. McCain voted to kill an appeal made by the chair that this amendment was out of order, effectively voting to kill the amendment. [1999 Senate Vote 171, 6/16/1999]

1. *2001: McCain Voted Against Establishing Renewable Energy Tax Credits. *McCain voted against establishing tax credits for investments in renewable energy technologies, incentives for new energy efficient residential construction and tax deductions for increased energy efficiency in commercial buildings. [2001 Senate Vote 125, 5/21/2001]

1. *2002: McCain Voted Against Renewable Energy Mandate. *McCain voted against an amendment to require utilities to generate 10 percent of electricity from renewable energy facilities by 2020. [2002 Senate Vote 55, 3/21/2002]

1. *2002: McCain Voted To Allow Exemptions From Renewable Energy Standards. *McCain voted for an amendment that would exempt retail electric suppliers in states that have state renewable energy standards from the federal renewable standard in the underlying amendment* .* [2002 Senate Vote 58, 3/21/2002]

1. *2002: McCain Voted To Allow Exemptions From Renewable Energy Standards.. *McCain voted to allow the Governor of a State the ability to waive certain provisions of the Federal mandate, if the provisions would adversely affect retail electric customers of the State, with respect to the application of the Federal renewable portfolio standard.* *[2002 Senate Vote 59, 3/21/2002]

1. *2002: McCain Voted Against Proceeding On A Measure To Provide $14.1 Billion In Energy-Related Tax Incentives. *McCain voted against a motion to invoke cloture on measure that would overhaul the nation's energy policies, restructure the electricity system and provide for $14.1 billion in energy-related tax incentives.* *[2002 Senate Vote 77, 4/23/2002]

1. *2002: McCain Voted Against Phasing Out MBTE And Voted Against An Ethanol Mandate.* McCain voted against keeping a renewable fuel program, including the phase-out of MTBE in the energy bill. [2002 Senate Vote 78, 4/23/2002] 1. *2002: McCain Voted Against Alternative Fuels Tax Credits.* McCain voted to strike provisions in the 2002 energy bill relating to alternative vehicles and fuel incentives. [2002 Senate Vote 91, 4/25/2002]

1. *2002: McCain Voted Against The 2002 Energy Bill. *McCain voted against the passage of a bill that would overhaul the nation's energy policies, restructure the electricity system and provide for approximately $15 billion in energy-related tax incentives. [2002 Senate Vote 94, 4/25/2002]

1. *2003: McCain Voted For Waivers Of Ethanol Mandates For States That Can Meet Clean Air Standards Without Adding Renewable Fuels.* McCain voted to allow states to waive the ethanol mandate in the renewable fuel program if the EPA Administrator determines, after a public notice and comment period, that implementation of renewable fuel requirement is not necessary to meet Clean Air standards, because States or regions can meet standards without adding renewable fuels. [2003 Senate Vote 203, 6/3/2003]

1. *2003: McCain Voted to Allow Governors to Waive Ethanol Mandates.*McCain voted to add language to the 2003 energy bill that would make a state subject to ethanol requirements only if the state's governor elected to participate. [2003 Senate Vote 204, 6/3/2003]

1. *2003: McCain Voted to Allow the President Exempt States Or Regions From Renewable Energy Mandates* McCain voted for an amendment that adds language that would give the president authority to exempt a state or geographic region from the ethanol requirements of the underlying amendment for 30 days if the Energy secretary determines the requirements have caused or will cause the average cost of gasoline to increase by at least 10 cents per gallon. The Fr ist amendment would require gasoline refineries to use 5 billion gallons of ethanol or other alternative renewable fuels annually by 2012, phase out the use of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and eliminate a requirement that gasoline sold in regions with high levels of air pollution contain 2 percent oxygen by volume. [2003 Senate Vote 206, 6/4/2003]

1. *2003: McCain Voted To Limit The Ethanol Mandate To The Midwest.*McCain voted for a measure that exempts States in East Coast, West Coast, and Rocky Mountain region from ethanol mandate, while leaving mandate in place in Midwest. [2003 Senate Vote 207, 6/5/2003]

1. *2003: McCain Voted Against Requiring Gasoline Refineries To Use 5 Billions Gallons Of Ethanol Or Other Alternative Renewable Fuels Annually By 2012. *McCain voted against an amendment that would require gasoline refineries to use 5 billion gallons of ethanol or other alternative renewable fuels annually by 2012, phase out the use of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and eliminate a requirement that gasoline sold in regions with high levels of air pollution contain 2 percent oxygen by volume. [2003 Senate Vote 209, 6/5/2003]

1. *2003: McCain Voted Against The 2003 Energy Bill.* McCain voted against passage of a bill to overhaul the nation's energy policies, restructure the electricity system and provide for approximately $15 billion in energy-related tax inc entives. It also would direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to set a new CAFE standard within 15 months to two years. It would encourage the use of alternative energy and require utilities to increase their reliance on renewable fuels. [2003 Senate Vote 317, 7/31/2003] 1. *2004: McCain Voted Against Phasing Out MBTE And Establishing Renewable Fuel Standards.* McCain voted a measure that would require that gasoline sold in or introduced into the United States contain renewable fuel in specific amounts, beginning with 3.1 billion gallons in 2005 and increasing each year to 5 billion gallons in 2012. [2004 Senate Vote 73, 4/29/2004]

1. *2005: McCain Voted Against Requiring Refiners To Use Renewable Fuels Like Ethanol And Phasing Out The Use OF MTBE.* McCain voted to kill an amendment that would require refiners to annually use 8 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2012, grant liability protection for ethanol manufacturers, phase out the use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether and eliminate the oxygen content requirement for reformulated gasoline. [2005 Senate Vote 138, 6/15/2005]

1. *2005: McCain Voted Against An Amendment Requiring Refiners To Annually Use 8 Billion Gallons Of Renewable Fuels By 2012, Grant Ethanol Manufacturers Liability Protection, And To Phase Out The Use Of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) As An Additive.*20McCain voted against an amendment that would require refiners to annually use 8 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2012, grant liability protection for ethanol manufacturers, phase out the use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether and eliminate the oxygen content requirement for reformulated gasoline. [2005 Senate Vote 139, 6/15/2005]

1. *2005: McCain Voted Against Renewable Energy Mandate. *McCain voted against an amendment that would mandate that renewable energy sources must produce at least 10 percent of the electricity sold by electric utilities by 2020, a minimum of 2.5 percent must be produced beginning 2008 through 2011. [2005 Senate Vote 141, 6/16/2005] 1. *2005: McCain Voted Against Major Energy Legislation Providing $18 Billion In Energy Related Tax Incentives.* McCain voted against final passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The bill would overhaul the nation's energy policy and provide for approximately $18 billion in energy-related tax incentives. [2005 Senate Vote 158, 6/28/2005]

1. *2005: McCain Voted With Senate Republicans To Slash $20 Million from Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Program for Farmers.* McCain voted for a budget package that almost entirely eliminated the popular and successful Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency program for farmers, cutting it from its current $23 million to only $3 million. The Energy Efficiency program had doled out more than $66 million in grants for 400 clean energy projects in Rural America since 2003, including ethanol plants. These projects, valued at over one billion dollars, include bio-energy projects, wind power, and energy efficiency improvements. [2005 Senate Vote 363, 12/21/2005; "Senate Passes Deficit Reduction Act Of 2005: Renewable Energy Programs Cut," Environmental and Energy Institute, 12/19/05]

1. *2006: McCain Voted Against Extending The Renewable Energy Production Credit; The Measure Also Included $290 Million For Renewable Energy R&D On Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Biomass, Hydropower.* McCain voted against an amendment that provided an additional $500 million for LIHEAP and $3.5 billion for other energy programs. The amendment extends the renewable energy production tax credit and clean renewable energy bonds programs for four years. The amendment provided for the following funding: Biomass cellulosic fuels ($250 million), Cellulosic biomass ethanol conversion assistance ($250 million), Renewable energy R&D Solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, hydropower ($290 million). [2006 Senate Vote 42, 3/14/2006]

Missouri Energy Independence Tour Rolls into St. Joseph

John Schueler — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:57:47 EDT

Late this afternoon, the Missouri Energy Independence Tour stopped off at Missouri Western State University in St. Joseph, MO. Students, undecided voters and supporters gathered in a classroom to join in a discussion on energy policy with Tom Carnahan, founder of the Capital Wind Group, Dan Kammen, a noted expert in energy policy, and Missouri State Audtior Susan Montee.

After some brief opening remarks and reflections from the panel, the audience began to ask questions and offer their own thoughts. One man sitting near the back indicated that upon being informed of this discussion, he got off his tractor and came straight to the auditorium.

I was out in the field when I got word, and I just had to come be a part of this. I'm a proud investor in Lifeline foods, one of the few production outlets totally owned by independent farmers. Our idea was, you put in your share, and you get something back for it. We took our time, and we did ethanol right. We produce food from corn, for numerous manufacturers like Frito Lay and then use the by products, which would normally be tossed, to create ethanol. It's a method that benefits the farmer directly and doesn't run up the price of food.

The panel applauded the methods employed by Lifeline, indicating that it set an example for the rest of the industry. Still, Dan Kammen noted, there is no one clear path to energy independence. Everything must be explored. He stood up and took a piece of chalk in his hand, writing the "$700 Billion" on the blackboard. "What does this number mean to you?" As members of the audience shot back with various things, including bail out, Dan nodded and underlined the number.

700 Billion dollars is not only the proposed amount for the bail out, but it's also the amount of money we spend EVERY YEAR on energy in this country. That's by far the single biggest industry in the world, yet energy companies only invest less than one half of one perfect of their revenues into research. By comparison, the three biggest bio tech companies invest around 15 percent of their earnings back into research.

To do this right, you have to explore all the possibilities. We can't simple pick one standard and run with it, that's the wrong path. In order to really achieve energy independence, we need to look at all forms of bio-fuels. Corn and cellulosic based ethanol, solar, wind and many others.

Tom Carnahan nodded in agreement and later built on that sentiment.

I heard Sarah Palin on the radio today saying that Obama and Biden are fools for wanting to invest in alternative energies because they're unproven. Well, my mom always tells me the story of how she held me up to the television when they showed the first man setting foot on the moon. We didn't know for sure that we could put on the moon when we started, but we had a leader with the vision to challenge our industry and our industry to help make that a reality. We can have that moment again. Barack is challenging this nation to become energy independent, and to believes by investing 150 billion dollars over the next ten years, we can make great strides towards achieving yet another American dream.

Energy with Angus Town Hall Meeting

Liz -Maine HQ — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:00:00 EDT

Dozens of Mainers gathered at the Lewiston yesterday for an Energy Solutions Town Hall Meeting with former Governor Angus King.

The meeting provided an open forum for residents to learn about Barack Obama’s plan to deliver relief from high home heating oil prices and build a secure, affordable, and clean energy future.

“Barack Obama’s energy plan will deliver immediate relief from high heating oil and gas prices, while jumpstarting investment in renewable energy production like wind power,” said Governor King. “Obama’s commitment to energy independence will create opportunities for Maine to emerge as a top leader in this new energy field, creating jobs, and helping to end our dependence on foreign oil. That is the kind of vision and leadership we need from our next president.”

Governor King also presented details of Obama’s New Energy for America Plan. The Plan would provide a $1,000 Emergency Energy Rebate for Maine Families, end our dependence on foreign oil, and make strategic investments in clean energy that will create 5 million new American jobs.

After listening to Governor King speak, attendees joined in a discussion about the tough choices Mainers will face this winter, and learned how they could get involved in the campaign.

CLICK HERE for more information on Senator Obama's energy plan.

Missouri Enegry Independence Tour: Faith in Wind

John Schueler — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:00:09 EDT

After visiting a windfarm in Rock Port, Missouri, Dan Kammen went along with the Missouri Energy Independence Tour to the town of Conception. He was met there by Ken Hendree, an employee of the Wind Capital Group who was eager to show off one of his favorite projects: The Conception Abbey.

The Abbey itself is a beautiful structure that stands out atop the northwestern Missouri landscape. Late last year, the Capital Wind Group completed the construction of a small wind farm in the area surrounding the Abbey. He gestured at the turbines in the background and explained how this had provided not only a wellspring of jobs and interest in the area, but also has become a new source of tax revenue for the area. Those taxes have gone towards improving schools and infrastructure in the surrounding community.

As Ken continued to outline the benefits to the community, one of the monks came out to greet the group. After some brief introductions he joined the discussion and extolled the values of this environmentally friendly form of energy. The members of the Abbey had blessed the wind farm earlier in the year, and according to the friar, they've really taken to it. "I haven't heard any complaints. Everyone loves it."

Stay tuned throughout the coming days for more updates from the Missouri Energy Independence Tour.

Rock Port: "It's Going to Take New Energy in Washington"

John Schueler — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:15:46 EDT

Tom Carnahan, who is the president and founder of the Wind Capital group, joined Dan Kammen, a leading energy researcher and policy advisor with the Obama campaign in Rock Port, Missouri this morning. Rock Port is a town that lays claim to being the first community in the United States to become completely energy independent.

Tom and Dan observed the turbines in action, and reflected on the possibilities of a community like Rock Port, where all the electricity they utilize is generated by wind power.

If you look at the meters, you'll often see something remarkable in this business: they're running backwards. On many days, we actually generate more energy than we can use. That means we get to sell the surplus back to the power companies, saving the community even more.

Dan marveled at this achievement, and reflected on what is needed to implement these strategies on a wide scale.

We haven't had a real progressive energy policy in this country for over twenty years... Making America energy independent is going to require more than just new energy sources, it's going to take new energy in Washington to make it a reality. We have that in Barack.

Missouri Energy Independence Tour Kicks Off

John Schueler — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:30:32 EDT

Today marked the kick off of the Missouri Energy Independence Tour. Local political leaders, energy experts and local advocates of energy independence will be discussing how alternative energies can break America's reliance on foreign oil and how Barack Obama will ensure they're developed and implemented.

Check out our Missouri Energy Independence Tour site for coverage over the coming days and more details on events in your area. Check back often as we'll be adding more stops and coverage as the tour rolls along.

Nicole S.from Raleigh, NC supports Obama

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:44:15 EDT

I am supporting Senator Obama for President because I strongly feel that a McCain administration would give us four more years of detrimental Bush environmental policies. To continue to be a world leader, America has got to break our dependence on oil and set a strong example for how best to manage our natural resources. Now more than ever, our country needs to be innovative, and Senator Obama has shown that he is willing and ready to move us forward into an era of change.

The Great Lakes Restoration Plan

Lauren Rosenthal — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:38:35 EDT

When I read this plan it reminds me of why I am so excited about electing Barack Obama and Joe Biden. I hope it convinces lots of other voters in the Great Lakes states.

Earlier this week the Obama campaign announced the Obama-Biden Great Lakes Restoration Plan. The plan calls for new federal funding of $5 billion to jumpstart Great Lakes Restoration, designates a Great Lakes Coordinator to coordinate Federal, State, and Local agencies and requires full implementation of the Great Lakes Compact. You can read the full fact sheet here: LINK <http://my.barackobama.com/page/-/Press/Fact%20Sheet%20Great%20Lakes%20091508%20FINAL.pdf>

Please download the fact sheet and send it to your friends in Great Lakes States.

Below are just some of the clips reviewing Obama's plan:

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Dan Egan) "Obama plan calls for $5 billion to protect, restore Great Lakes": Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is promising to push for $5 billion in new funds to protect and restore the Great Lakes if he gets elected in November. LINK <http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=794908>

Associated Press (John Flesher) "Obama proposes $5B trust fund for Great Lakes": Sen. Barack Obama will propose a $5 billion trust fund for Great Lakes cleanup and restoration if elected president, his campaign said Tuesday." LINK <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-obama-greatlakes,0,3533364.story>

Cleveland Plain-Dealer (Stephen Koff) "Obama announces Great Lakes plan": Barack Obama's campaign today is announcing a plan -- with five points and $5 billion to be spent over ten years -- to clean up the Great Lakes. LINK <http://www.cleveland.com/realtimenews/index.ssf/2008/09/obama_announces_great_lakes_pl.html>

Minnesota Public Radio (Tom Scheck) "Obama proses $5B trust fund for Great Lakes": Sen. Barack Obama's campaign says the presidential candidate would propose a $5 billion trust fund to clean up and restore the Great Lakes if he's elected. LINK <http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/09/16/obamagreatlakes/>

Detroit Free Press (Barb Arrigo) "The lakes get some campaign love": The Obama-Biden campaign has put together quite a sensible plan for addressing Great Lakes concerns. Sure, it may be pandering to states in the region that are largely "in play" for the Nov. 4 election. Certainly other candidates (e.g., George W. Bush in 2004) have done the same thing, and then walked away. LINK <http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080916/BLOG2501/80916065>

News10 Now (Web Staff) "Obama's Great Lakes cleanup fund": Presidential hopeful Barack Obama was campaigning in Michigan on Tuesday and mentioned a proposal that would impact Upstate New York. LINK <http://news10now.com/content/all_news/watertownnorth_country/124184/obama-s-great-lakes-cleanup-fund/Default.aspx>

Columbus Dispatch (Jim Siegel) "Obama proposes Great Lakes Protections": Sen. Barack Obama on Tuesday said he will push for $5 billion in new federal funding to jumpstart restoration work in the Great Lakes, including sewage repairs, toxic cleanups, and wetlands restoration. LINK <http://blog.dispatch.com/politics/2008/09/obama_proposes_great_lakes_pro.shtml>

New Richmond News (Wheeler News Service) "Obama says he'll want $5 billion to clean up Great Lakes": Democrat Barack Obama says he'll want $5 billion to clean up the Great Lakes if he's elected president. LINK <http://www.newrichmond-news.com/articles/index.cfm?id=30881&section=Wisconsin%20News&property_id=9>

Detroit Free Press (Tina Lam) "Obama proposes $5-billion fund for Great Lakes": Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama proposed today a five-point plan to fund and coordinate the restoration of the Great Lakes. LINK <http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080916/NEWS15/80916045>

Minnesota Independent: "Obama announces plan to jump-start Great Lakes restoration": With six of the eight Great Lakes states being hotly contested battlegrounds <http://www.politico.com/convention/swingstate.html> , this election year the protection and restoration of the Great Lakes is being elevated to a major campaign issue.Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama today proposed a major plan to jump-start the process. LINK <http://www.minnesotaindependent.com/9018/obama-announces-plan-to-jump-start-great-lakes-restoration>

Barack proposes $5B trust fund for Great Lakes

Amanda Scott — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:19:57 EDT

The Associated Press just reported on Barack's new plan for the Great Lakes...

Sen. Barack Obama will propose a $5 billion trust fund for Great Lakes cleanup and restoration if elected president, his campaign said Tuesday.

The fund, to be phased in over 10 years, would be the centerpiece of a plan that also includes designating a coordinator to oversee Greats Lakes programs and a stepped-up fight against invasive species.

The Democratic nominee's campaign announced the plan in a telephone conference featuring Democratic Sens. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Gov. Jim Doyle of Wisconsin.

"America deserves to have a president who understands that supporting the Great Lakes isn't just about scoring points during the election year," Doyle said. "It's about preserving our environment and protecting a vital economic engine in the Midwest."

The trust fund would be paid for by rolling back tax breaks for oil companies, Obama's campaign said. It would support a variety of projects including sewage system repairs, cleanup of polluted sediments and restoration of wetlands and wildlife habitat.

...Obama's program also pledges a "zero toxics" policy for the lakes, which make up nearly one-fifth of the world's fresh surface water. It calls for measuring pollution already entering the lakes, determining the sources and reducing future deposits.

Another priority would be strengthening federal standards against mercury, a leading Great Lakes pollutant, the campaign said.

The plan also promises a more aggressive effort to prevent additional exotic species from reaching the lakes, particularly the Asian carp, which has infested the Mississippi River and is moving toward Lake Michigan.

It says Obama would work with the eight Great Lakes states to stop freighters from bringing exotics to the region in their ballast water. Scientists believe many of the 180 invaders now in the lakes arrived in ship ballast tanks.

Foreign creatures such as the zebra mussel and round goby compete with native species for food and habitat and cost the regional economy billions.

Obama's supporters said the Illinois senator was more familiar with the Great Lakes than his opponent, Sen. John McCain.

Governor Schweitzer discusses the importance of electing Obama for moving America toward energy indepedence

David from Chicago, IL — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:35:04 EDT

Just weeks after electrifying the Democratic Convention, Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer joined the ranks of Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Al Gore and Joe Biden by headlining the 31st annual Tom Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa on Sunday. He spoke passionately about the changes we need to make in our energy policy and the presidential administration we need to take us there.

Senator Tom Harkin introduced Schweitzer as one of the party’s WMDs - “West of the Mississippi Democrats”. Schweitzer brought Jag, his border collie, to the event, flipped steak on the grill, and addressed the crowd. The Iowa Independent highlighted key portions of his remarks:

“We can’t drill our way out of our energy problem, and anyone who thinks we can is delusional,” [Schweitzer] said. “Drilling is one aspect, but we need to focus on American sources of energy like biofuels, wind, and solar.”

Schweitzer said Republican nominee John McCain has spent his entire political life blocking renewable energy.

“He’s a senator from Arizona, and he even votes against the sun,” he said. “We can’t even count on him to support solar power.”

Schweitzer said that support for renewable energy is one of the biggest differences between an Obama or a McCain presidency. “McCain voted 25 times against renewable fuels,” he noted. “Biofuels are the future of America.”

The paper also talked to Schweitzer following the Steak Fry on the presidential campaign’s relevance for rural Americans:

Iowa Independent: Senator McCain has a suspect track record on agriculture. How do you get the rural vote, which is a key swing vote, to get back on the economics of rural America, rather the on personalities and cultural issues?

Schweitzer: McCain, I believe, has never voted for a farm bill. He’s never supported any investment in rural America. He’s against wind power. He’s against biofuels. He’s from Arizona and he’s against sun power.

So I don’t know what he offers rural America.

Barack Obama has a plan to invest in rural America, build transmission lines, invest in biofuels, invest in wind and solar power, which will all create jobs. In fact, Obama’s energy plan will produce 5 million new jobs in America — energy produced in America, designed by American engineers and developed by American workers.

When you compare their ideas for the future, one is more of the same and the other is a man with a plan.

Deborah W. from Anchorage, Alaska supports Obama

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:17:19 EDT

As a resident of Alaska for thirty years, I have seen dramatic, adverse, costly changes from human caused global warming – including eroding villages, dying forests, massive fires, shrinking lakes, a disappearing ice cap, starving polar bears, and disrupted traditional cultures. Through the use of geothermal, wind and other resources, we have the tremendous potential to harvest renewable energy in our state and nation.

I support Senator Obama because he and Senator Biden understand that we must address the human causes of global warming and because they strongly support renewable energy – and have voted accordingly. This is simply not the case with the McCain/Palin nominees. Reporting from the frontline of global warming, I can vouch that there is no time to lose and that the stakes are too high to ignore either science or action. Our nation needs and deserves leaders who can bring us together, boldly and intelligently, to address our most pressing energy and environment needs; and Senators Obama and Biden are that team.

Compare Energy Policies

Amanda Scott — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:01:55 EDT

Check out how Barack and McCain differ on energy policies.

Sportsmen and Sportswomen Support Obama

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:54:05 EDT

We are hearing from lots of Sportsmen and Sportswomen from around the country who support Senator Obama. Be sure to check out his fact sheet for Sportsmen/women (is there a better, shorter way to say that?) under the Issues Section of this web site.

Chris A, Harrison Twp, MI wrote:

As an avid hunter and fisherman in Michigan, the restoration of the Great Lakes, lakes and rivers in Michigan as well habitat conservation for fish and wildlife are incredibly important to my quality of life. For that reason, I must support Senator Obama for President. For one reason, in his time as Senator he has supported the largest source of conservation funding where Senator McCain did not--the Farm Bill. Also, Senator Obama is from the Great Lakes region and will best understand the issues that this region faces.

Morris Sun Tribune: Obama supporters: Candidate on right side of renewables

Xavier Lopez-Ayala — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:09:11 EDT

From the Morris Sun Tribune:

Minnesota supporters of presidential candidate Barack Obama claim their candidate alone is most capable of ensuring that on-going renewable energy initiatives so important to rural areas are not compromised and allowed to flourish.

The Obama Heartland for Change Tour made a brief stop at the University of Minnesota, Morris on Monday as part of a state-wide tour of the state this week.

The Morris stop focused on renewable and sustainable energy issues, and the contingent’s belief that Obama’s plans are more in tune with the area’s moves to develop them.

The panel included Assistant Minnesota Senate Majority Leader Tarryl Clark, former Minnesota Agriculture Commissioner Jim Nichols, former State Director of USDA Rural Development Gary DeCramer, and UMM Vice Chancellor for Finance and Facilities Lowell Rasmussen.

DeCramer said the recently passed Farm Bill contains support for renewable energy initiatives and that Obama is on the right side of those efforts. Republicans tried to veto the measures.

“The important thing now is that we have an administration that carries through,” DeCramer said.

DeCramer said the federal government, through agencies like Rural Development, can positively affect rural energy projects but that that support must be carefully directed.

“There’s a strong role for the federal government in promoting rural development,” DeCramer said. “But if you come in dangling a bag of money and distribute it mostly to corporate interests, you lose that sense of connection with local people.”

Nichols, a UMM alum, said rural America is “the future of energy in this country.”

A life-long farmer, Nichols called Republican presidential candidate John McCain “a clone” of President George Bush when it comes to renewable and bioenergy, and that Republican National Convention rhetoric convinced him that the party is now friend to new energy technologies. He encouraged students to get involved.

“If you’re not part of this change, it’s not going to be a very bright future,” Nichols said. “(The Republicans) will overturn what we’ve done in this state (and) stop the advance in the nation.”

Rasmussen touted UMM’s many achievements in developing and using renewable energy systems.

“A lot of places talk about renewable energy,” he said. “Morris is doing it.”

Wind power and bio-energy are already powering, heating and cooling much of the UMM campus, and the university, its students, the West Central Research and Outreach Center and the ARS Soils Lab are partners in a team effort to further renewable energy ambitions.

“We’re a national leader and we hope to continue to push that envelope,” Rasmussen said.

In response to a question about nuclear energy, Nichols said he’s not opposed to nuclear power options, but said the enormity of the cost associated with building and operating plants mean it can be only part of the energy solution.

“If you want to move into some very expensive energy, nuclear is the way to go,” he said.

And cost is only part of the issue with nuclear energy, Clark said. France is an example of a country “doing creative things” with nuclear energy, but that security issues regarding the protection of the plants makes it a less-attractive option compared to wind and bioenergy, she said.

Conservation was raised by another audience member, and the panelists assured him that it, too, was a major part of Obama’s energy plans.

Emergency energy rebates also were mentioned as a way to help people, especially the elderly with fixed incomes, pay for heating costs when the weather turns cold.

Clark advocated more partnerships like those underway at UMM, citing as an example the fact that many wind turbines currently in use in the U.S. are manufactured overseas.

“We need to build them here,” she said. “It’s a lot cheaper.”

Heartland for Change: Tour of Wind Turbine and Biofuel Gasification Facility in Morris

Xavier Lopez-Ayala — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:40:44 EDT

State Senator Tarryl Clark, Former Agriculture Commissioner Jim Nichols, and Campaign for Change Outreach Director Scott Cooper toured the Biomass Gasification Facility and a wind turbine at the University of Minnesota's Morris campus after an incredibly productive town hall on renewable energy in rural Minnesota.

UM-Morris is a leader in renewable energy initiatives, both in Minnesota and America, and is home to the first large-scale wind research turbine ever constructed in the United States, which produces 5.6 million kilowatt hours of power each year--more than half of the campus' annual energy requirements.

The wind turbine and biomass gasification facility are an example of what can be done to secure our energy future, and it's going to require far more than the same old Washington gimmicks proposed by John McCain and Sarah Palin. It will require a sustained and shared effort by government, businesses, education and research facilities, and the American people. With the clean tech research being done at UM-Morris, Minnesota proves that, with clarity of direction and adequate resources, Americans poses the insight, courage, and determination to build a new economy.

The Biomass Gasification Facility is a testament to the potential of partnerships between communities, universities, and state and local governments, as Senator Obama calls for. What started with the Minnesota Legislature's appropriation of funds to build the facility in 2005, is on track to reach its goal of energy self-sufficiency on the UM-Morris campus by 2010.

Biomass technology allows crops such as corn stover and other fibrous plants to be used as fuel sources, sources which don't produce greenhouse gases and emit fewer pollutants than coal, oil, and wood. Click here to take a virtual tour of the Biomass Gasification Facility

The facility at UM-Morris generates steam to meet 80% of the campus heating and cooling needs--proof that, with proper investment, Americans can rise to the energy challenge and transform our energy economy.

Senator Obama has a comprehensive energy plan that provides immediate relief to struggling Minnesotans, and summons the nation to confront our dependence on foreign oil, address the moral, economic, and environmental challenge of global climate change, and build a clean energy future that benefits all Americans. You can learn more about Barack's New Energy for America plan by clicking here.

Here are some more pictures of the tour of the biomass gasification facility and wind turbine at UM-Morris.

The Heartland for Change RV Tour is making its way through 24 communities across Minnesota, talking with folks in coffee shops, senior centers, and in their homes about Barack Obama and Joe Biden's plans to bring the change Minnesotans need. Click here to find a stop near you or to follow our travels across the state.

Luke K. from Anchorage, Alaska supports Barack

Lauren Rosenthal — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:16:11 EDT

Luke writes:

I’m voting for Barack Obama. His vision is evident in his energy policy: I cannot wait for the day when our nation’s energy will come from clean, renewable sources and the kind of revitalization that will provide for our economy, as opposed to having to endure four more years of drilling policies that create more problems than they solve. As an avid sportsmen and backpacker, I’m also concerned for our public lands and wildlife. His commitment to these public resources is unquestioned and is one that recognizes the balancing act between conservation, recreation, and economic development, a balance that has been lacking over the last eight years and one that we can’t afford to lose for four more years.-

--WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO GO VOLUNTEER AT YOUR LOCAL CAMPAIGN OFFICE. FIND IT ON THIS WEBSITE UNDER STATES. OR GO TO THE ACTION CENTER AND GET STARTED MAKING CALLS FROM HOME!

Energy Independence is a top priority for Obama

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:52:54 EDT

As I write this I am listening to Barack speak to a group near Scranton, PA and address the need for new sources of power and the imperative that we address global warming. In answering a question from the grandson of a coal miner he said in part: "There is no perfect energy source... but when we put our mind to something we get it done. And the problem is we have not put our mind to becoming energy independent... That's going to change under my administration because there is too much at stake." 9/5/08

Personally, I am just so thrilled that we have a candidate that believes Global Warming is real, is caused by human activity, is already impacting our climate and that our nation needs to make clean energy a top priority along with energy independence.

For some comments from other environmental leaders read the article linked below (guess who they think is a better choice for Green voters?)

Obama/McCain/Environment: Reuters (Deborah Zabarenko) “Best bet to turn the White House green?”: Who's best equipped to turn the White House green -- John McCain or Barack Obama? Both have made energy security and environmental stewardship part of their presidential campaigns. Both favor curbing the greenhouse gas emissions that spur climate change. Both say they want to stop U.S. "addiction" to imported oil. Obama, an Illinois Democrat, has the support of most U.S. environmental groups. McCain's stance on global warming led Republicans to hope they could sway environmentally inclined independent voters. LINK

Mark S. From Ann Arbor, Michigan supports Barack too...

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:59:52 EDT

-I support Barack Obama, because he understands how important the Great Lakes are to Michigan. As a Senator from a Great Lake State, he knows how important the Great Lakes are to our economy, our recreation and our way of life. My family has a deep connection with Lake Michigan and it provides us great opportunities to fish for steelhead and brown trout, hunt for waterfowl and simply enjoy a walk along the sandy shores with my kids.

Obama has supported efforts to clean up the lakes from pollution, fight invasive species such as the zebra mussel, and help restore critical wetlands that provide habitat for wildlife and help keep our drinking water clean. An Obama Presidency would help move our Great Lakes State and our nation forward.

Marc S., Ann Arbor, MI

Why Andy O. from Madison, Wisconsin supports Barack

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:54:36 EDT

Andy O. writes:

I support Barack Obama because so much is at stake in this election.

Some years elections seem to matter less than others. Some elections provide outcomes that seem to make little difference. Other years, during times of trial such as these, the results of elections shape the future of our nation.

The Presidential election of 2008 is an election of great consequence. Our nation's very identity and nature will be dramatically better and truer to the nation's founding principles under Barack Obama's leadership than under John McCain's autocracy. Under President Barack Obama we will have a leader for clean energy change leading to a safer world.

John McCain has sat out decisive votes for wind power while Barack Obama has worked for many years for a new, modern energy future. McCain promises more drilling, less energy efficiency, and, overall, more addiction to fossil fuels. The John McCain road is more of the same Bush-Cheney energy policies.

Now is the time for us to be active of a democracy, to join with other members of our community to steer this country to a future safer and more suitable for our children.

Let's all turn out the vote on November 4, 2008!

Why Amie from Oklahoma and Brett from Wisconsin Support Barack

Lauren Rosenthal — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:53:00 EDT

Brett H. From Madison, Wisconsin writes:

I support Barack Obama for president because he is the only candidate with an inspiring and effective national energy policy that will save us money at the pump, bring us more efficient vehicles and appliances, more clean renewable energy, and clean up old coal plants. He is a the real champion to reduce global warming and will work with local governments on practical solutions, not just supporting drilling more sensitive coast lines and wildlife refuges. I also appreciate his judgment to chose a running mate show shares his values and mine.

Amie N. From Broken Arrow, OK writes:

I support Barack Obama because I am ready for a president who can relate to the majority of people who are struggling to get by, who sets a positive example for young people, who inspires others to take an active role in their community and country, and who will use good judgment as our leader. I am ready for Barack Obama!

Why I Support Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Biden

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:15:28 EDT

Having turned to the Environmentalists for Obama page on this website, it should not surprise you to read that I suppport Obama/Biden because the issues most important to me are energy independence, climate change, green jobs and the economy and creating a healthier environment.

I have three children. They ask me how my generation can continue to burn fossil fuels and disregard the lasting impact that will have on our climate. They ask if we will ever develop renewable energy resources as a nation or if we will put the money into solar and wind power that will make them viable technologies on a large scale. They ask if we will protect our wet lands as they have seen horrendous flooding in Spring Green, Wisconsin and if we will protect our Great Lakes as we live near Lake Michigan and depend on its fresh water.

My kids are sophisticated about these issues as their parents are obsessed with moving these agendas forward. But I owe it to them and to you and your children to do all I can to help elect Barack Obama because he and Joe Biden have a clear understanding that these issues are vital to our future in America and understand how to bring people together to solve these issues. I encourage you to go to the issues page and read the New Energy Plan for more details.

Biden: An excellent environmental choice

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:47:49 EDT

I was going to research and post a blog entry on our new VP candidate and then I found that Kathleen M. from Alaska already did the work. I am pretty excited about this ticket-- just comparing the League of Conservation Voter scores is enough to convince some voters. Kathleen wrote:

Just look at some of the facts about Biden's environmental record that earned him a lifetime score of 84 from the League of Conservation Voters (Obama's score was 96; McCain's, a pitiful 26):

* Supports an 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050

* Supports 40 miles-per-gallon fuel efficiency standards by 2017

* Wants the US to use 20% renewable energy by 2020

* Opposes offshore drilling or drilling for oil in the Arctic (ANWR)

* Take Big Oil's $2 billion dollar tax breaks to pay for offshore wind farms

* Ensured protection of 100% of the coastline in his home state

* Wrote a plan to exchange debt-relief for rainforest protection

* Believes polluters should pay Superfund fees to clean up their toxic waste

* Wants the US to take a stronger stance to end commercial whaling

Best of all, he's got the voting record to back all of this up. Being from Alaska, I like it that Delaware is a coastal state and Biden can lend his voice to healthy fisheries and sustainable economies.--

Host A Convention Watch Party

Amanda Scott — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:26:19 EDT

UPDATED: Due to the incredible response, we've expanded our shipping operation and have extended the deadline for event creation to midnight tonight (Thursday). All event hosts who create their event online before the deadline will receive an official Watch Party packet.

In eight days, Barack will accept the nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Denver.

It will be the biggest night of the campaign so far, and you can share the moment with millions of fellow supporters across the country.

Before Barack delivers his speech, we're inviting our supporters to gather with friends and neighbors to start planning organizing efforts for the short time we have left before November.

There's no better way to reach out to your friends and family than to invite them to be a part of this historic moment. This is a unique opportunity to continue growing our movement in your community and watch as we make history together.

Right now, volunteers at the national headquarters are hard at work assembling and mailing packets to all of the event hosts. Thursday night is the final night to register your event in order to receive an official packet.

Your Favorite Quote on Energy or the Environment

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:11:01 EDT

Did you know that you can read past speeches delivered by Senator Obama on the website? Just go to the Learn tab at the top of the page and select "speeches." or use this address: http://www.barackobama.com/speeches/index.php

I am issuing a challenge:

Look at the past speeches on Energy and Environment--and any other credible source of Obama quotes--and send us your favorite quote related to energy, environment, sportsmen, conservation, land use etc. We want it short--no more than three sentences. Then, we will choose from the best to post on the top of our somewhat dated web page introduction and find other creative ways to use them (which you can also suggest).

I can't wait to see what you find.

Energy Roundtable in Golden

Greg Hauenstein — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:17:54 EDT

This past Thursday, Colorado for Change held a roundtable discussion with residents of Golden, local business leaders, and renewable energy experts to discuss this country's energy future and what is being done locally to fuel the growth of the alternative energy industry here in Colorado.

Moderated by Colorado State Senator Chris Romer, Chairman of the 2007 State Senate Select Committee on Renewable Energy, the panel consisted of Jeff Probst, the CEO of Blue Sun Biodiesel, Kim Jordan, the CEO of Fort Collins’ New Belgium Brewing Company, and Brad Collins, the Executive Director of the American Solar Energy Society.

The discussion focused on Senator Obama’s plan to offer short term relief to families struggling with rising costs and make the long term investments our country needs to achieve energy independence. You can read more about Senator Obama's plan for energy independence on our issues page.

Kim Jordan, the CEO of Fort Collins’ New Belgium Brewing Company, highlighted her company’s commitment to renewable energy, conservation, and on-site energy production to show how a successful “green company” can make environmentally conscious decisions and still be a competitive force in the market.

“Going forward, the business sector and government must come together to provide the necessary incentives to move to a green economy. With a sustained and shared effort by our government, our businesses and the American people, we can confront this national challenge and build a clean energy economy that benefits everyone.”

Senator Obama knows we cannot drill our way out of this problem. Community leaders like Kim Jordan and the other members of the panel are all over this country and will be the driving force of this economic and environmental revolution.

What steps have you taken to "green up" your lifestyle? Tell us in the comments.

Obama Backs Words With Action

Cameron Davis — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:44:48 EDT

It's been big news in our region -- including battleground states Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and sometimes Minnesota -- that both presidential candidates say they support the Great Lakes Compact to set uniform, binding water conservation standards. Barack Obama was a co-sponsor of federal Compact legislation to back the Compact. John McCain did not co-sponsor. While Sen. McCain didn’t object to the Compact, there’s a pattern developing: he says he supports our waterways, but doesn’t co-sponsor legislation to put actions behind his words.

The Great Lakes are the lifeblood of our region. Barack Obama understands that. He and his family have lived near Lake Michigan with his family for nearly 20 years. I support Barack Obama for president because he’ll act quickly to save the waters that I love, not simply talk about his support for the Great Lakes.

Video: "New Energy for America" Speech in Lansing, MI

Christopher Hass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:44:44 EDT

This morning in Michigan, Senator Obama announced a comprehensive New Energy for America plan designed to address the current energy crisis and move America towards an energy economy based on renewable resources and new technologies. In his speech, he identified our addiction to foreign oil as "central" to all of the major challenges facing us today, and called for the end of "the age of oil" in our time.

Here's the video of the full speech:

Read the full New Energy for America plan.

New Energy for America

Christopher Hass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:52:02 EDT

This morning in Michigan, Senator Obama announced a comprehensive New Energy for America plan designed to address the current energy crisis and move America towards a 21st century energy economy. Some of the proposals put forth today include:

Providing short‐term relief to American families facing pain at the pump
Helping create five million new jobs by strategically investing $150 billion over the next ten years to catalyze private efforts to build a clean energy future.
Within 10 years, saving more oil than we currently import from the Middle East and Venezuela combined.
Putting 1 million Plug‐In Hybrid cars – cars that can get up to 150 miles per gallon – on the road by 2015, cars that we will work to make sure are built here in America.
Ensuring 10 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012, and 25 percent by 2025.
Implementing an economy‐wide cap‐and‐trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

You can read the full New Energy for America plan below:

Barack Obama's New Energy Plan For America - Scribd.com/BarackObama

Barack in Lansing, MI: "We must end the age of oil in our time."

Christopher Hass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:24:19 EDT

Senator Obama just concluded a major speech in Lansing, Michigan where he addressed our current energy crisis and described our addiction to foreign oil as "central" to all of the major challenges facing us today.

Without a doubt, this addiction is one of the most dangerous and urgent threats this nation has ever faced - from the gas prices that are wiping out your paychecks and straining businesses to the jobs that are disappearing from this state; from the instability and terror bred in the Middle East to the rising oceans and record drought and spreading famine that could engulf our planet.

In response to these challenges, Obama announced his New Energy for America plan, which includes an immediate energy rebate to Americans struggling with high gas prices, the creation of five million new green jobs, and the elimination of our dependence on Middle Eastern oil in ten years.

In his speech, Senator Obama outlined a number of short terms goals to lower gas prices and help working families struggling to make ends meet, but he also emphasized that:

We simply cannot pretend, as Senator McCain does, that we can drill our way out of this problem. We need a much bolder and much bigger set of solutions. We have to make a serious, nationwide commitment to developing new sources of energy and we have to do it right away.

Read the full remarks, as prepared for delivery . . .

Watch Barack LIVE in Michigan: Creating a 21st Century Energy Economy

Christopher Hass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:45:23 EDT

Senator Obama is in Lansing, Michigan this morning to announce a New Energy for America plan. This new policy proposal addresses the current energy crisis by providing an immediate $1,000 emergency rebate to help families pay rising fuel costs, investing $150 billion to create 5 million "green" jobs, and weaning the country off Middle Eastern oil in 10 years.

You can watch a live stream of the event below:

Obama Campaign Releases TV Ad on Obama's New Energy for America Plan

Laurin Manning — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:26:02 EDT

Obama Campaign Releases TV Ad on Obama's New Energy for America Plan

30-Second Spot Highlights Senator Obama's Plan to Offset the Costs of Rising Energy and Addresses Oil Industry Contributions to John McCain's Campaign.

CHICAGO - As Barack Obama announces his New Energy for America Plan today, the Obama campaign unveiled a new ad, one that illustrates the clear choice in this election between an approach that keeps us sending billions to oil companies and foreign governments and one that gives middle class families a $1,000 rebate funded by a windfall profits tax on the oil companies. Pocket highlights that for far too long, we've had an energy policy that has worked for the oil companies. Barack Obama believes it's time we had an energy policy that works for the American people.

Today Senator Obama is outlining his New Energy for America plan in a speech in Lansing, Michigan. Obama's plan will provide an immediate energy rebate to Americans struggling with high gas prices, create five million new green jobs, and eliminate our need for Middle Eastern oil in 10 years.

Watch the ad below:

GAS PRICES and OIL COMPANY PROFITS

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:25:37 EDT

Below is a Statement from Senator Barack Obama on Record Exxon Mobil Profits While Americans Pay Skyrocketing Gas Prices at the Pump

"Perhaps the only thing more outrageous than Exxon Mobil making record profits while Americans are paying record prices at the pump is the fact that Senator McCain has proposed giving them an additional $1.2 billion tax break. While Senator McCain's plan has succeeded in helping his campaign raise over $1 million from oil and gas company executives and employees just last month, it won't lower gas prices or end our dangerous dependence on foreign oil. Instead of an energy policy that reads like an oil-company wish list, it's time to create a new American energy economy by investing in alternative energy, creating millions of new jobs, increasing fuel efficiency standards, and ending the tyranny of oil once and for all," said Senator Barack Obama.

Barack in Cedar Rapids, Iowa

Christopher Hass — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:00:40 EDT

Senator Obama was in Cedar Rapids, Iowa earlier today for an Economic Security Town Hall. The trip marked Barack's first return to Iowa since the end of the presidential primary. In his opening remarks, Barack explained:

After I announced my run for the presidency, our very first campaign stop was right here in Cedar Rapids. It was the dead of winter. The skeptics predicted we wouldn't get very far. The cynics dismissed us as a lot of hype and a little too much hope. And by the fall, the pundits in Washington had all but counted us out.

But the people of Iowa believed that this moment could be different.

Barack spoke of the need to ease the economic burden on working families, to lower gas prices, and invest in alternative energy.

When all is said and done, my plan will create entire new industries and thousands of new businesses, while working to strengthen our national security and save our planet. These steps are not far-off, pie-in-the-sky solutions – the American people are ready to make this change. Today, there are waiting lists for fuel-efficient cars. I've seen a steel mill in Pennsylvania that has become the home of a new wind turbine factory, a small business in Nevada powered entirely by solar power, and farmers here in Iowa who are testing the new, efficient generation of biofuels that can drive our economy. Across the planet, countries like Germany and the United Kingdom have already implemented clean energy polices. Now it's America's turn to lead.

Read the full remarks, as prepared for delivery . . .

Energy Is Top Economic Issue For Voters

Amanda Scott — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:09:44 EDT

The Wall Street Journal has a new poll that shows that energy is the top economic issue for voters:

...A new Wall Street Journal/NBC news poll finds that energy -- including gasoline and utility costs -- ranks as the economic issue that voters say affects them the most personally.

New data indicate Americans are conserving energy with fervor.

The Energy Information Administration reported Wednesday that gasoline stocks posted a 2.8 million-barrel build in the week ended July 18, exceeding the 200,000-barrel increase forecast by analysts. In the past two weeks, the price of crude oil has fallen 14% from its New York Mercantile Exchange record close of $145.29 reached July 3, in part due to weakening demand. Thursday on the Nymex, crude oil for September delivery rose $1.05 per barrel, or 0.8%, to settle at $125.49.

The prolonged stalemate over energy policy raises the stakes for both parties heading into the fall election.

...Polls indicate voters trust Democrats over Republicans, by substantial margins, to do a better job on energy. The Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 42% of respondents preferred Democrats for dealing with energy policy, versus 22% favoring Republicans.

...Polls of likely voters in four battleground states, conducted this month by Quinnipiac University in partnership with The Wall Street Journal and Washingtonpost.com, show voters in each state say energy policy is more important to them than the war in Iraq.

Obama campaign statement on Bush administration move on offshore drilling

Sam Graham-Felsen — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:54 EDT

Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton on President Bush's plans to lift the moritorium on offshore drilling...

If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks. But most experts, even within the Bush Administration, concede it would do neither. It would merely prolong the failed energy policies we have seen from Washington for thirty years. Senator Obama believes Americans need real short-term relief, which is why he has proposed a second round of stimulus with energy rebates for working families. And over the long-term, Senator Obama understands that our national security and the survival of the planet demand a real strategy to break our dependence on foreign oil by developing clean, new sources of energy and by vastly improving the energy efficiency of our cars, trucks and our economy. He is ready to lead such a transformation.

Visit NewEnergyForAmerica.com for more on Obama's plan to provide Americans with real relief and long-term solutions for a clean energy future.

Obama in Dayton, Ohio: A Secure Energy Future

Amanda Scott — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:39:54 EDT

Barack held a town hall meeting at the Stivers School for the Arts in Dayton, Ohio this morning. He spoke about making sure that this country has a secure energy future. He said...

I’ve often said that the decisions we make in this election and in the next few years will set the course for the next generation. That is true of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s true of our economy. And it is especially true of our energy policy.

The urgency of this challenge is clear to anyone who’s tried to fill up their tank with gas that’s now over $4 a gallon. It’s clear to the legions of scientists who believe that we are nearing a point of no return when it comes to our global climate crisis. And with each passing day, it is clear that our addiction to fossil fuels is one of the most serious threats to our national security in the 21st century.

...An even more immediate and direct security threat comes from our dependence on foreign oil. The price of a barrel of oil is now one of the most dangerous weapons in the world. Tyrants from Caracas to Tehran use it to prop up their regimes, intimidate the international community, and hold us hostage to a market that is subject to their whims. If Iran decided to shut down the petroleum-rich Strait of Hormuz tomorrow, they believe oil would skyrocket to $300-a-barrel in minutes, a price that one speculator predicted would result in $12-a-gallon gas. $12 a gallon.

The nearly $700 million a day we send to unstable or hostile nations also funds both sides of the war on terror, paying for everything from the madrassas that plant the seeds of terror in young minds to the bombs that go off in Baghdad and Kabul. Our oil addiction even presents a target for Osama bin Laden, who has told al Qaeda, “focus your operations on oil, since this will cause [the Americans] to die off on their own.”

If we stay on our current course, the rapid growth of nations like China and India will rise about one-third by 2030. In that same year, Middle Eastern regimes will be sitting on 83% of our global oil reserves. Imagine that – the very source of energy that fuels nearly all of our transportation, controlled almost entirely by some of the world’s most unstable and undemocratic governments.

This is not the future I want for America. We are not a country that places our fate in the hands of dictators and tyrants – we are a nation that controls our own destiny. That’s who we are. That’s who we’ve always been. It’s what led us to wage a revolution that brought down an Empire. It’s why we built an Arsenal of Democracy to defeat Fascism, and stopped the spread of Communism with the power of our ideals. And it’s why we must end the tyranny of oil in our time.

Here are some pictures from the event...

Read the full remarks, as prepared for delivery...

Protecting the Great Lakes

Lauren Rosenthal — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:28:16 EDT

I am so pleased that yesterday Senator Obama released the following statement regarding protection of the Great Lakes through the Great Lakes Compact. I live just a few blocks from Lake Michigan and really treasure that water. With all of the Great Lakes state governors supporting the Great Lakes Compact, we seem to be getting really close to positive action in Washington to make this protection a reality.

Senator Obama's statement is as follows:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:

Wednesday, July 9, 2008 Michael Ortiz, 202 228 5566

Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Great Lakes Compact

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Barack Obama today released the following statement after the state of Michigan became the latest Great Lakes state to sign the Great Lakes Compact. The Compact is an agreement between the eight lake-bordering states to protect the Great Lakes from water diversions and exports. The Compact must now be approved by Congress.

“The Great Lakes are an international treasure and supply drinking water to almost 30 million people in our country. The Great Lakes Compact is an historic agreement to protect our Great Lakes from water diversions and exports. It is, perhaps, the most significant legal action to protect the Lakes in the last 100 years since the Boundary Waters Treaty between the U.S. and Canada. This Compact on managing Great Lakes water is essential for the environmental and economic health of the region.

“All eight Great Lakes states have approved the Compact and now it’s time for the Congress and the President to take action. The Compact should be quickly ratified. I will be an original co-sponsor of this legislation with Senator Carl Levin and Senator George Voinovich and will work across the aisle to pass this important bill. I am committed to working to fully implement this Compact to protect America’s truly Great Lakes.”

New Obama Campaign Ad Sets Record Straight on Energy

Sam Graham-Felsen — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:23:07 EDT

CHICAGO, IL – The Obama Campaign today released a new ad which sets the record straight on energy policy and responds to false, negative attacks by John McCain and the Republican party.

The 30-second spot, “New Energy,” highlights Senator Obama’s plan to make us energy independent and bring relief to middle class families, compared to John McCain’s plan to continue George Bush’s failed energy policy and offer more tax breaks to big oil. The ad will run in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – the same four states in which the Republican National Committee is running false, negative ads attacking Barack Obama.

Barack Obama's energy plan will provide meaningful short-term relief for our families and make a historic investment in alternative energy development that will create millions of new jobs, keep the cost of energy affordable and secure our energy independence once and for all.

Watch “New Energy” ...

SCRIPT – “New Energy”

On gas prices, John McCain’s part of the problem.
McCain and Bush support a drilling plan that won’t produce a drop of oil for seven years.
McCain will give more tax breaks to big oil.
He’s voted with Bush 95% of the time.
Barack Obama will make energy independence an urgent priority.
Raise mileage standards.
Fast track technology for alternative fuels.
A $1000 tax cut to help families as we break the grip of foreign oil.
A real plan and new energy.
OBAMA: I’m Barack Obama and I approve this message.

Learn more about Obama's comprehensive energy plan at NewEnergyForAmerica.com.

In the news

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:30:19 EDT

Share your thoughts on this an other articles you see in the news related to energy and the environment.

Obama touts 'green' energy on visit to Springs Preserve
The Las Vegas Review-Journal | June 25, 2008
By Molly Ball

Under the bleach-bright Las Vegas summer sun, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Tuesday checked out the solar panels that shade cars in the parking lot of the Springs Preserve while powering the facility. "What we are seeing here ... is that the green, renewable energy economy is not some far-off, pie-in-the-sky future," Obama said in a speech at the local nature attraction. "It is now. It's creating jobs now. It is providing cheap alternatives to $140-a-barrel oil now. And it can create millions of additional jobs, entire industries, if we act now." In his first visit to Nevada since becoming the Democrats' presumptive nominee, Obama visited Las Vegas to put forward his energy plan Tuesday morning. The energy issue has become the focal point of the candidates' recent sparring as it hits Americans in the pocketbook in the form of skyrocketing gasoline prices. Obama proposed long-term investments in renewable energy as the solution and said "green" jobs like those at the Springs Preserve could provide work to locals suffering from the construction slowdown.

Read the full article from The Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Great New Green T-Shirts!

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:19:57 EDT

We are happy to offer you what you've been asking for - an Obama t-shirt that you can proudly wear to show your support of the greenest candidate to ever run for president. Enjoy!

Off Shore Drilling; Green Jobs

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:09:22 EDT

Obama/Govs Meeting: AP (Nedra Pickler) “Obama criticizes McCain on offshore drilling”: Barack Obama said Friday that presidential rival John McCain's proposal to allow offshore drilling "makes absolutely no sense at all" as he headed to Florida to put the Republican on the spot over the issue. Obama said opening up the U.S. coastline to oil exploration would not give Americans any appreciable savings until 2030. "Even then you're looking at cents on a gallon of gas," Obama told Democratic governors at a meeting in his hometown. "Who knows 22 years from now, what would gas be at the pace that we're going right now?" Instead, Obama said he would invest $150 billion over the next 10 years to create green jobs, particularly in the automotive industry and to improve the electricity grid so people can drive plug-in hybrid vehicles. LINK

OFF SHORE OIL DRILLING--NOT A GOOD IDEA

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:05:00 EDT

Here is the Obama campaign response to the idea of Off Shore Oil Drilling:

"John McCain's support of the moratorium on offshore drilling during his
first presidential campaign was certainly laudable, but his decision to
completely change his position and tell a group of Houston oil
executives exactly what they wanted to hear today was the same
Washington politics that has prevented us from achieving energy
independence for decades. Much like his gas tax gimmick that would
leave consumers with pennies in savings, opening our coastlines to
offshore drilling would take at least a decade to produce any oil at
all, and the effect on gasoline prices would be negligible at best since
America only has 3% of the world's oil. It's another example of
short-term political posturing from Washington, not the long-term
leadership we need to solve our dependence on oil. Instead of giving
oil executives another way to boost their record profits, I believe we
should put in place a windfall profits tax that will help to ease the
burden of higher energy costs on working families, and we should invest
in the affordable, renewable sources of energy that Senator McCain has
opposed in the past.".

Is Better Than Bush Enough?

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:29 EDT

An editorial I thought you would want to see and share...

The Boston Globe

On energy policy, is better than Bush enough?

By Carol M. Browner and Bob Sussman

June 10, 2008

LAST WEEK, the Senate considered a bipartisan global warming bill - the closest such a far-reaching measure has ever come to passage. Although the bill failed in the end, over half of the Senate supported action on climate change.

The next Congress and administration will have a historic opportunity to build on this momentum and deliver the American people a comprehensive program to reduce greenhouse gases. The voters this fall must decide an important question: Who is the best candidate to make that happen?

Following Senator John McCain's May 12 speech on global warming, many hastily praised the Republican presidential candidate for breaking ranks with President Bush and his own party's orthodoxy by calling for mandatory greenhouse gas reductions. But we should not be so quick to give McCain kudos. While McCain represents an improvement over eight long years of denial and inaction by the Bush administration, being better than the current president is not good enough. In fact, McCain's record and recent proposals raise real questions about his commitment to the bold measures we need to combat global warming.

If McCain's version of straight talk on the environment means missing key votes for clean low-carbon energy, then we have a lot to worry about. Twice, in December and February, when the Senate failed by one vote to extend key production tax incentives for wind and solar power, McCain not only didn't vote but said subsequently he would have opposed these measures. Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, voted for them.

While many agree that a "cap and trade" program is probably the best mechanism to achieve the necessary reductions in greenhouse gases, McCain's "cap and trade" proposal comes up notably short. Take, for example, the issue of allocation of allowances to emit greenhouse gases. McCain would initially distribute all of the allowances free of charge to emitters, which the experts agree would likely mean a windfall to these polluters. McCain would have Congress punt to an unelected commission to make a decision - somewhere down the road - on when and in what amounts allowances might be auctioned. Obama advocates a 100 percent auction of allowances from the start. He would use the revenues generated by the auction to help consumers meet energy costs and promote clean technologies.

McCain would also allow polluters to meet all of their obligations by buying emission reductions, or "offsets," from other sectors of the economy or from outside the United States. By opening the door to unlimited offsets, McCain's approach would invite polluters to take credit for alleged reductions that cannot be verified and allow the highest emitting sources to continue operating dirty facilities indefinitely. Obama would limit the use of offsets and would direct EPA to examine rigorously any offsets used.

In addition to a strong cap and trade program, other tools will be required to achieve a serious reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Once again McCain's positions come up short. His global warming plan specifically rejects tighter building standards for energy-efficient homes as burdensome regulation. But then, McCain has repeatedly voted against national renewable electricity standards similar to the standards already adopted in nearly half of the states. By contrast, Obama has made ambitious proposals to boost development and deployment of new efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

While McCain told the online publication Grist last October, "I'm not one who believes that we need to subsidize things," he has long been fixated on subsidizing nuclear plant construction - which already receives substantial federal support. One of the reasons he gave for opposing the recent Senate climate change bill was the absence of sufficient nuclear incentives.

The world's leading climate scientists are absolutely clear climate change is real and the time for action is now. Barack Obama has made bold and comprehensive proposals that will deliver the deep emission reductions scientists say are essential. Although McCain once introduced legislation, his current positions on energy, renewables and a cap and trade program are simply outdated; they have not kept pace with the times.

Carol M. Browner was EPA administrator from 1993 to 2001. Bob Sussman, a campaign adviser to Barack Obama, was EPA deputy administrator from 1993-94.

Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Climate Change Bill

Sam Graham-Felsen — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:32:10 EDT

CHICAGO, IL -- Today, Sen. Barack Obama released the following statement on the Climate Change Bill...

As this week’s debate on climate change has unfolded, the American people and those watching us around the world had every reason to hope that we would act. Every credible scientist and expert believes action is necessary. This is critical and long overdue legislation that represents a good first step in addressing one of the most serious problems facing our generation.

Like many of my Senate colleagues, I believe the legislation could have been made even better. Had there been a substantive Senate debate about some of the concerns with this bill, I believe the outcome could have generated broad support. It certainly would have received my support.

Unfortunately, the Republican leadership in the Senate has chosen to block progress, rather than work in a good faith manner to address this challenge. This is a failure of our politics and a failure of leadership – a President who for years denied the problem, and a Republican nominee, John McCain, who claims leadership on the issue but opposes this bipartisan bill.

We can’t afford more of the same timid politics when the future of our planet is at stake. We are already breaking records with the intensity of our storms, the number of forest fires, and the periods of drought. By 2050, famine could force more than 250 million from their homes. And if we do nothing, sea levels will rise high enough to swallow large portions of every coastal city and town.

This bipartisan legislation establishes an economy-wide cap on greenhouse gas emissions. It helps states, cities, and towns invest in technologies to reduce energy bills for homeowners, increase energy efficiency, construct green buildings, and expand public transit. It invests in green technology to help our automakers to retool and our fossil-fuel industries to become clean. The bill provides real financial relief to working families. Importantly, the bill restores our great nation’s international leadership role, while including provisions to ensure that all major emitting nations also take serious action to solve this global problem.

Let me be clear, this bill is not perfect. Emissions reductions must reflect the scientific consensus, which are reductions of at least 80 percent 2050. We must ensure that more middle-class families reap more of the financial benefits created by this bill. And we must direct greater resources to the regions of the country that will bear the brunt of this critical transition to a clean energy economy.

I believe that the American people are ready to lead the world on this issue. The time for distractions, divisions, and excuses is over. The time for new coalitions, informed and civil debate, and a sense of shared purpose is long overdue. As president, I am committed to ensuring that our children and our children’s children can point to this generation as the time when American found its way again.

Click here to learn more about Obama's plan for a clean energy future.

What Issues Are Important to You

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:58:06 EDT

We expect environmentalists to have an important roll to play in the general election as global warming, energy independence and other energy and environmental issues will be part of the debate. Lots of other environmental issues will be discussed as well.

What environmental issues are of concern to you and where you are from? Would you like an environmental roundtable or other event in your town to discuss these issues? Are you fired up and ready to win in November?

Video: Obama Discusses the Environment in Bozeman, Montana

Sam Graham-Felsen — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:50:37 EDT

Last night, before a crowd of 7,500 in Bozeman, Montana, Barack discussed the need to protect our environment...

Click here for more on Obama's plan to crack down on emissions, promote green jobs, and protect our environment. And make a donation today if you want to turn the page on environmental policy!

Why Environmentalists Support Sen. Obama for President

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:11:26 EDT

Senator Barack Obama released the following statement in response to
Senator McCain's remarks in Portland today:

"It is truly breathtaking for John McCain to talk about combating
climate change while voting against virtually every recent effort to
actually invest in clean energy. You don't have to look further than the
wind turbine plant where Senator McCain is speaking today to assess his
commitment to this cause. While Senator McCain talks about the need to
invest in alternative energy, he rejected the single biggest investment
in renewable energy in history, including incentives that contributed to
a nearly 50% increase in wind power generation last year, and he has
repeatedly opposed renewable fuel mandates and higher fuel efficiency
standards for cars and trucks.

"In stark contrast, I've called for a national standard to ensure that
we're using more renewable energy, an expansion of our green energy
sector that would create millions of green jobs, and a bipartisan plan
to double our fuel efficiency standards. That is why the American people
will have a clear choice in November when I am the nominee - between a
candidate who opposes real solutions to our energy crisis, and
leadership that will solve it once and for all."

NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTALISTS SUPPORT OBAMA

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 03 May 2008 18:01:16 EDT

Over seventy North Carolina environmental leaders and activists have endorsed Senator Obama. For the full list click on the link in the section just above this blog-- Additional signers from Indiana and other states to be listed soon!

National Environmental Group Friends of the Earth Endorses Obama

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 03 May 2008 13:16:09 EDT

We are very pleased to report that Friends of the Earth has endorsed Senator Obama. The press release follows:

For Immediate Release

May 3, 2008

Contact:

Nick Berning, 202-222-0748

National Environmental Group Endorses Barack Obama for President

Friends of the Earth Action cites senator's stand for real energy solutions instead of sham Clinton-McCain 'gas tax holiday' as key reason for endorsement

WASHINGTON, D.C.-Friends of the Earth Action, a national environmental group based in Washington, D.C., announced today that it is endorsing Senator Barack Obama to be the nation's next president.

"We endorse Senator Obama because we believe he is the best candidate for the environment," said Friends of the Earth Action President Brent Blackwelder. "The 'gas tax holiday' debate is a defining moment in the presidential race. The two other candidates responded with sham solutions that won't ease pain at the pump, but Senator Obama refused to play that typical Washington game. Instead, Obama called for real solutions that would make transportation more affordable and curb global warming. He showed the courage and candor we expect from a president."

Experts agree that gas prices are likely to decline only slightly under a Clinton-McCain "gas tax holiday"-if they decline all. Instead of signing onto this gimmick, Obama has called for long-term solutions that would limit oil consumption by requiring cars to be more fuel efficient and expanding transportation options including passenger rail.

Blackwelder cited Obama's strong pro-environment record, his policy proposals, the profile he has given global warming in his campaign, and the broad mandate he is building for change as other reasons for the endorsement. Obama earned a 96 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters during his first two years in the Senate. Blackwelder said Friends of the Earth Action plans to inform its more than 100,000 activists in the U.S. about its support for Obama and to campaign for him in remaining primaries.

Friends of the Earth Action previously endorsed John Edwards in the Democratic primary process and engaged in early state independent expenditures on his behalf.

###

Friends of the Earth Action (www.foeaction.org <http://www.foeaction.org/> ) provides extra muscle to our sister organization, Friends of the Earth, in legislative battles affecting our environment. FoE Action and our affiliated PAC also serve as Friends of the Earth's political arm, making thoughtful political endorsements, providing direct support to candidates, and placing environmentalists in the field on critical campaigns. Friends of the Earth Action's mission is to promote a clean, healthy and just world and to ensure that we have lawmakers who will work to protect the environment.

Hear About Enviro/Energy Policy SOUTH BEND AND FORT WAYNE

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:43:35 EDT

HEAR ABOUT GAS PRICES; GAS TAXES; WATER ISSUES; ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND WHY OBAMA WILL BE A GREAT ENVIRONMENTALIST PRESIDENT THIS FRIDAY IN INDIANA

FORT WAYNE: FRIDAY, MAY 2 from 11 until 12:30 at the Allen Couty Public Library at 900 Library Plaza in Ft. Wayne Indiana. Former Mayor Graham Richard, City Council Member Karen Goldner, and campaign advisors on energy and the environment Cameron Davis, Jack Darin, Howard Learner will be there to discuss Senator Obama's positions and answer your questions. Pizza provided. Bring an undecided friend.

SOUTH BEND: Join Ryan Dvorak, Chair, Environmental Affairs Committee, Indiana House of Representatives; Notre Dame Professors Vince Rogeau and Barbara Connolly and campaign advisors Cameron Davis, Jack Darin and Howard Learner for a discussion of the moral imperative of addressing global warming, gas taxes, gas prices, water issues, green jobs and other matters regarding energy and the environment.

South Bend Chocolate Cafe, 122 S. Michigan Street, South Bend from 4 until 5:30. Come, have a cookie and bring an undecided friend.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama Statement on Earth Day

Sam Graham-Felsen — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:19:52 EDT

Chicago, IL — Today, Senator Obama issued the following statement to mark Earth Day.

“As America and the world observe Earth Day, the call to save our planet has never been more urgent. In recent years, we’ve seen the harm that more severe weather events can do. We’ve seen it in the droughts that have swept the South, the hurricanes that threaten our shores with increasing ferocity, and the rising sea levels that could one day submerge our cities. This is a challenge unlike any the world has ever faced, and America must lead the world to meet it.

“But Earth Day is not just an urgent call to action; it is a reminder that what is now a global effort began as a grassroots movement for change. Nearly forty years ago, our nation was at war, recession loomed on the horizon, and Americans were losing faith in their own government. But in the face of division and despair, young Americans came together around a common purpose. In high schools, and on college campuses, in small towns and big cities, they rose up to demand that Washington help solve our growing environmental crisis and establish Earth Day.

“While our planet is in greater peril now than it was forty years ago, we are now better prepared to protect it. From solar panels to windmills to biofuels, innovators in America and around the world are inventing our way to a clean energy future. But solving our climate crisis requires more than technological breakthroughs. Our leaders in Washington have to put what’s right for our planet ahead of what’s good for their friends in the energy industry. Executives in the energy industry have to understand that there’s nothing inconsistent about acting in a way that’s both responsible and profitable. And each of us has to do more in our own lives to use energy more efficiently.

“We have a choice in this country. We can continue with an energy policy that makes no sense, and serves the interests of the big oil and gas companies at great cost to our planet. Or we can choose a different future – a future where America is energy independent, and no longer funding both sides in the war on terror; a future where we’re leading rather than undermining the global effort to combat climate change; and investing in green energy technology, and creating the jobs of the future. That is the future I believe in, and that is the America I’m running for President to lead.

“On this Earth Day, let’s recapture in Washington, on Wall Street, and all across this country the spirit of unity and urgency that led those students to found Earth Day all those years ago. And if we can do that, then I truly believe we won’t just be freeing ourselves from the tyranny of oil, or saving this planet for our children, we’ll be fulfilling our obligation to be good stewards of God’s creation.”

Show that GREEN MATTERS

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:39:47 EDT

AS you may know, Earth Day is this week. In light of that an inspired and enthusiastic group of Environmentalists for Obama have set up a virtual "Event" to show that "Green Matters." In this case green is both money and environmentalism... The worthy concept is to donate now and through APRIL 22 which is Earth Da and to encourage others to donate money to the campaign on a special page to let Senator Obama know that environmentalists support him because he is the strongest environmental candidate. To get on board get your credit card ready and go to this address:

https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/pf?outreach_page_id=11431

Then, spread the word.

Donations in any amount are welcome.

Debate Thread: Energy

Sam Graham-Felsen — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:39:48 EDT

Barack just discussed his energy plan -- you can read the details here.

Too many presidents have promised action on energy policy, and yet continued down a path of reliance on foreign oil...

Let's put someone in the White House who won't simply make promises, but will deliver on energy reform.

PS If you've been watching the debate and you're tired of the attacks, here's a great way to send a message.

SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY, GREEN JOBS AND HOPE

Lauren Rosenthal — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:23:10 EDT

Something I wanted to share. Written by an environmentalist for Obama, James R.: "I read a book recently: "Once Upon a Wilderness" by Calvin Rutstrum (copyright 1973, pg #38) and it contained a passage that has stayed with me: "Man has been extraordinary in many of his accomplishments; but if he is ever to be labeled a fool, it must first be most evident in the ecological province of his thinking, second in his sacrificing his health, and third in his disregard forÂ the humanities in favor of an urban obsession with the monetary and material".It's my hope and expectation the Mr. Obama will lead our country into a new sustainable economy that offers green-collar jobs and moves away from an oil-based infrastructure."
HOPE FOR A CLEANER, GREENER FUTURE!

Video: Barack on Gas Prices in Beckley, WV

Sam Graham-Felsen — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:43:01 EDT

Barack held a town hall in Beckley, West Virginia this past Thursday. Watch his answer on how to deal with the soaring prices of gas...

Click here for Barack's plan for a clean energy future.

Obama in Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Sam Graham-Felsen — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:52:36 EDT

FAIRLESS HILLS, PA—Senator Barack Obama today toured Gamesa Energy USA, a wind turbine manufacturer in Fairless Hills, and held a town hall meeting with workers where he pledged to end the special interest influence in Washington and strengthen the middle class.

“We need real change – the kind of change that’s about more than switching the party in the White House,” Obama said. “We need a change in our politics – a leader who can end the division in Washington so we can stop just talking about our challenges and start solving them; who doesn’t defend lobbyists as part of the system, but sees them as part of the problem; who actually says what he means and means what he says; and who will be a voice for middle class Americans every day for the next four years. And that’s the kind of President I intend to be."

At the meeting, Obama discussed his plans to invest $150 billion over 10 years to build a green energy sector that would create up to 5 million new jobs for workers in Pennsylvania and across the country. He also stressed his opposition to unfair trade deals like NAFTA and vowed to end tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, while rewarding those that keep good jobs with decent wages here at home.

Obama has also announced plans to provide a $1,000 tax credit for working families, cut health care costs for the typical American family by up to $2,500 per year and eliminate income taxes altogether for seniors with an annual income of less than $50,000.

His commitment to make a real difference in the lives of working families like those in Bucks County began nearly 25 years ago when he worked as an organizer to provide job training and set up after-school programs in a Southside Chicago community devastated by steel plant closings.

Bucks County, once home to a US Steel plant that employed nearly 10,000 workers at its peak, faced similar challenges when the company closed the bulk of its operations in the area by the early 1990s. The Gamesa plant now sits at the site of that former US Steel facility and has already begun to employ hundreds of Pennsylvanians in secure, higher-paying jobs that are part of the emerging green economy in the area. Gamesa is the world’s second-largest wind energy turbine manufacturer and the world’s fourth-largest energy developer.

Read more about Senator Obama’s plan to strengthen the middle class by creating 5 million new green jobs.

If you're a Pennsylvania resident, check out PA.BarackObama.com to find your local offices and learn how you can get involved on a grassroots level.

And for folks around the country, let's step it up and make calls to Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina -- visit My.BarackObama.com/call today.

Barack Holds Rural Economy and Green Jobs Discussion in Nelson, Ohio

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:42:20 EST

CAITLIN HARVEY POSTED THE FOLLOWING REPORT ON Mar 2nd, 2008 at 12:57 pm EST Also listed in: Ohio Action Team | Ohioans For Obama

Barack held a discussion on strengthening rural economies and investing in green jobs at Hocking College in Nelsonville, Ohio this morning. Hocking College, a two-year technical college that offers degrees in natural resources and alternative energy, prepares students for work in the green economy.

A flex fuel car at the event harnessed solar energy, which provided the power for the event.

Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia introduced Barack, praising his judgment and intelligence. He said:

[Barack's] calm, but don't misinterpret that to mean he's calm without toughness. He's unflappable because of his calm and his brilliance and his belief in doing the right thing for America.

Barack spoke about the importance of investing in green jobs and alternative energies, saying:

Green jobs are the jobs of the future, not just because they pay well and can't be outsourced, but because they reduce our dependence on foreign oil and may just save the planet. I'm going to invest $150 billion dollars into creating a green energy sector. There's no "silver bullet" energy source. We need to invest in clean energies like solar, biodiesel, and the equipment to help us capture windpower and make clean coal.

...If we truly want to strength our rural economy, we're going to have to make broader investments in rural America. I will launch an initiative to create job growth in rural economies, and provide the kind of technology that companies need to provide wireless and broadband service in rural areas. It's time that the people in Appalachia had a partner in the White House.

One person asked Barack his position on ethanol. He said:

I have been a big supporter of corn based ethanol, but corn based ethanol is not as efficient as we need it to be. We need to continue to set goals on making corn based ethanol more efficient. Where the real future lies is going to be in areas like cellulosic ethanol -- using fuels that don't impact our food prices and are also more efficient energy producers.

...The question is if the federal government is approaching this in the same way that Kennedy approached going to the moon...if we can aim to do something like that, that scientifically isn't yet proven. If we set a goal that we can reduce our foreign oil consumption by quantum leaps, there's no reason we can't do it.

Almost like being there...

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:08:38 EST

James from Columbus, OH transcribed the comments of environmental leaders in Columbus, Ohio on February 29th. Links to all of the comments, photos of the speakers and a podcast are all below. Thanks, James! James writes for IrregularTimes.com where you will find the full posting as well.

Here are all four:

1. Robert Sussman: Link

2. Cameron Davis:
Link

3. Dan Martin:
Link

4. Question and Answer:
Link

Each of the links contains a text transcript and a link to an audio podcast of the proceedings.

Way to Go, Green Team in Texas!!!

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:26:53 EST

Last night, our amazing and dedicated enviro team in Texas, along with UT-Austin Students for Obama and National Geographic Correspondent Lisa Ling, presented a great discussion that is featured in the following article posted on the Daily Kos....

Obama Gets His Green On by kath25 Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 05:43:14 PM PST

Which Presidential Candidate has pledged to commit $150 billion dollars and 10 years of effort to bring clean energy to the United States? Which candidate has the ability to help bring enough good Democrats into office that we can take decisive action against global warming, and push for a sustainable energy policy? Which candidate has the potential to turn his grassroots campaign movement into a force to bring environmental issues to the forefront of our national concerns?

These questions were on my mind this afternoon, as I attended a panel discussion organized by UT’s Students for Barack Obama on Obama’s energy policy.

The panel featured Dan Kammen, an internationally-recognized expert on global warming and energy policy and one of Obama’s top advisors; Jim Marston, Texas state director of the Environmental Defense Fund; and Representative Mark Strama, a local legislator with a strong history in grassroots activism. The discussion was a mixture of science and activism, with equal time discussing finite policies as the importance of GOTV this weekend here in Texas. It was refreshing to hear this mix of academics and politicians talking about the intersection of pragmatism and idealism. All agreed that because Obama is the candidate best capable to help get Democrats elected in Red States, and the candidate most likely to carry Red States in the general election, he will build a genuine coalition and take office with a legitimate mandate. This will make it all the more possible for him to carry out his legislative agenda, and bring the needed change that his opponent seems to dismiss like so many nickels and dimes.

The panel was moderated by UT Professor Michael Webber, who started with a powerful introduction that reminded me of the importance of sound energy policy both to Texas, and to the rest of the planet. He remarked on how UT’s great wealth came in part from the oil found under university lands, and how many alumni now lead the world’s biggest oil and gas companies. Yet as we look to transition away from fossil fuels and towards alternatives, the Jackson School has looked to become an innovator in green energy, here in Texas and beyond. Webber spoke about how finally global warming was gaining traction, and for the first time would be considered a major issue, one that might turn the tide of the election. He spoke of the Republicans and their policies of high production and high consumption, in contrast to the ideal position of Democrats, many of whom advocate for low production and low consumption.

The event drew an impressive crowd for a Friday afternoon in a hard-to-find campus building, and perhaps most inspiring were the number of students....

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/29/20228/1083/219/466594

Environmentalists at Ohio State Moritz College of Law Friday 2/29

Lauren Rosenthal — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:28:12 EST

In case you missed this amazing panel discussion in Columbus, Ohio go to http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/02/29/clinton-epa-official-robert-sussman-speaks-on-environment-and-barack-obama/ for the full text of comments by Clinton EPA Official Robert Sussman and a link to a podcast. The comments by the other two speakers, Cam Davis and Dan Martin, will be posted soon. When you get to their site at http://www.irregularnews.com/ go to Elections 2008 and look for the other two podcasts. If you find them before I do send the link in a comment!

Thanks to Jim attending the event and recording it so others can hear/read the remarks too.

MCCAIN SCORES A ZERO ON LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS SCORECARD

Lauren Rosenthal — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:57:16 EST

THIS JUST IN BY WAY OF A SIERRA CLUB PRESS RELEASE. IT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.

>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 21 February 2008
>Contact: David Willett, 202.491.6919
>         Josh Dorner, 202.675.2384
>
>                  McCain Scores a ZERO on the Environment
>            Arizona Senator Skipped Every Crucial Vote in 2007
>
>Washington, D.C.--In the 2007 National Environmental Scorecard released
>today by the League of Conservation Voters, John McCain receives a score of
>ZERO. McCain was the only member of Congress to skip every single crucial
>environmental vote scored by the organization, posting a score lower than
>Members of Congress who were out for much of the year due to serious
>illnesses--and even lower than some who died during the term. By contrast,
>the average Member of Congress scored a 53 in 2007. McCain posts a
>lifetime score of only 24.
>
>          Statement of Carl Pope, Sierra Club Executive Director
>
>"We were appalled two weeks ago when John McCain was the only Senator who
>chose to skip a crucial vote on the future of clean energy in
>America-dooming the measure to fail by just a single vote. As it turns
>out, this was merely the most recent example of a clear pattern of missing
>the most important votes on energy and the environment--as his abysmal LCV
>score clearly demonstrates.
>
>"McCain missed votes to save his constituents $499 million dollars at the
>pump and at least $550 million on their energy bills, while creating more
>than 10,000 new clean energy jobs in his home state.
>
>"Out of 535 Members of Congress, John McCain is the only one who chose to
>miss every single key environmental vote scored by the League of
>Conservation Voters last year. When it came time to stand up and vote for
>the environment, John McCain was nowhere to be found.
>
>"Every other Member who received a zero from LCV last year at least had the
>temerity to show up and vote against the environment and clean energy time
>after time. And unlike John McCain, I doubt any of them would claim to be
>environmental leaders or champions on global warming.
>
>"The votes chosen by LCV represent the most important votes on the most
>pressing environmental matters facing us today: energy, global warming,
>clean water, stewardship of our public lands, and other crucial issues.
>Republicans and Democrats alike in both chambers received perfect scores of
>100 this year, proof that being green isn’t a question of red or blue.
>
>"John McCain’s LCV score exposes the real record behind the rhetoric: a
>lifetime pattern of voting with polluters and special interests instead of
>consumers and the planet when it comes time to stand up and be counted. Or
>perhaps worse yet: a consistent refusal to stand up and be counted at all.
>We encourage people to contact John McCain and tell him it’s time to start
>showing up to vote when the environment is on the line."
>
>-------
>
>For more information please visit: www.lcv.org/scorecard
>
>League of Conservation Voters 2007 Scorecard Senate votes, all of which
>John McCain missed:
>1.    Cloture on H.R. 6, the energy bill (6/21, Vote 225)
>2.    Passage of H.R. 6, the energy bill (6/21, Vote 226)
>3.    Maintaining Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) in H.R. 6 (12/7,
>Vote 416)
>4.    Taking away giveaways to Big Oil to subsidize clean energy (12/13,
>Vote 425)
>5.    Loosening public health and environmental regulations on refineries
>(6/13, Vote 210)
>6.    Undermining the RES with coal and nuclear energy (6/14, Vote 211)
>7.    Offshore drilling in Virginia (6/14, Vote 212)
>8.    Liquid coal (6/19, Vote 213)
>9.    Environmental safeguards for biofuels (6/20, 219)
>10.   Consider global warming for water projects (5/15, Vote 166)
>11.   Appropriately prioritizing water projects (5/15, Vote 165)
>12.   International family planning (9/6, Vote 320)
>13.   Farm Bill subsidy reform (12/11, Vote 417)
>14.   Farm Bill subsidy caps (12/13, Vote 424)
>15.   Eminent Domain for public parks (12/3, Vote 429)
>
>                                      # # #

Hey Ho--Go to Ohio, or Texas

Lauren Rosenthal — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:06:00 EST

It seems it is impossible to get away from discussion of this election. Everyone wants to debate issues (me included) and be involved (also, guilty).

In short--while it is enormous fun to debate issues and dream of how amazing this world will be with a president who actually cares about stopping global warming and creating a green economy with green jobs and energy independence... over the next two weeks we can do the most by focusing on getting out the vote!

To that end we invite environmentalists to go to Ohio and Texas. Indeed, if you want to talk policy--when you sign up to go put "enviro" on the form when it asks if you are traveling with a group. The staff will then do it's best to send you to the same locations as other enviros and where we will be holding issues forums with nationally prominent environmental leaders. That way after you canvas all day, you can debate over refreshments in the evening and if you are in town on the right days--go to the forums. We will be using local folks to set up social events for enviros in Ohio and Texas so we all know where to meet. If you are in Cleveland or Austin and want to set up an event--send back a comment and let us know--

So, go to <http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/travel> and sign up to go.

If you cannot travel (which is most of us--jobs, small children, small budgets) we want you to make phone calls. To get started go to: http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/phonebankmap. Every call matters. Lastly, email your environmental contacts - especially in Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania, and tell them over 270 environmental leaders from around the country have endorsed Barack Obama and thousands of environmentalists have signed on to support him as well. Ask them for their support too. A copy of the letter is on the webpage just above this blog.

More ideas for how we can help in the next two weeks? Send them in by way of the comments below.

Thanks!

Obama touts green jobs plan at McKinstry Company in Seattle

Sam Graham-Felsen — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:41:46 EST

SEATTLE – During a visit to McKinstry Company, a Seattle-based mechanical contractor that retrofits buildings to make them energy-efficient, Senator Barack Obama today laid out his comprehensive plan to create a green economy and combat climate change through investment in new clean energy technology.

“In this campaign, I’ve proposed a comprehensive solution to our energy crisis. It’s a plan that will develop and deploy the next generation of energy – a plan that will create new industries and millions of new, good-paying jobs right here in America. They are jobs that can’t be outsourced and won’t disappear. They are jobs like ones right here at McKinstry, and they are the future of our economy,” Obama said.

Obama’s plan would create millions of new American jobs by investing $150 billion over 10 years to advance the next generation of green energy technology and infrastructure, provide job training and transition programs to help train workers for employment in the green economy and establish new national energy standards to spur demand for clean, sustainable sources of energy.

The plan would also provide incentives to improve building efficiency – a market that McKinstry Company tapped into several years ago, resulting in rapid growth and increased profitability for the family-led company that was named a 2007 “Best Places to Work” by Seattle Business Monthly.

Obama was joined on the visit by Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, a leader in addressing the causes of global warming both in his own city and across the country. Three years ago, Nickels launched an effort to urge U.S. mayors to agree to enact their own greenhouse gas reduction programs in their cities. Six-hundred and fifty mayors in all fifty states have now signed that agreement.

Obama’s comprehensive plan to create a green economy and combat climate change includes:

Implementing a market-based 100% auction cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

Investing $150 billion over 10 years to advance the next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure, accelerate the commercialization of plug-in hybrids, promote development of commercial-scale renewable energy, and begin transition to a new digital electricity grid.
Using proceeds from the cap-and-trade auction program to invest in job training and transition programs to help workers and industries adapt to clean technology development and production.
Creating a Clean Technologies Deployment Venture Capital Fund and investing $10 billion per year in it for five years to fill a gap in U.S. technology development.
Requiring 25 percent of all electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025 and at least 30 percent of the federal government’s electricity to come from renewable sources by 2020 to ensure less carbon intensive energy is used in our energy supply.
Setting a goal of making all new buildings carbon neutral, or produce zero emissions, by 2030 and establishing a grant program for early adopters.
Flipping incentives of energy utilities to ensure companies earn increased profits for improving energy efficiency, rather than higher energy consumption, and expanding Federal efficiency grant programs to help to improve efficiency of buildings.

Investing in a digital smart grid to enable a tremendous increase in renewable energy generation and accommodate 21st century energy requirements.

Senator Obama’s program to create a green economy can be viewed HERE.

Senator Obama’s full climate change and energy independence plan can be viewed in full HERE.

This is Obama’s second visit to Seattle since announcing his plans to run for President. Earlier today he received the endorsement of Washington Governor Christine Gregoire who will join him later today at a rally at the KeyArena.

Mark H says Barack will stand up for wildlife and environment

Lauren Rosenthal — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:37:15 EST

I would argue that climate change is the single largest issue for the environment and wildlife. For me, it's not necessary that Barak state his position on the Roadless Rule or the Tongass NF (I agree these are important issues). There are countless other issues such as reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act, DOI funding, censorship of scientists, mining, offshore oil and gas development, state-based wildlife funding etc. etc. that he could take a public position on too. Barack has been the most consistent in expressing the need for a new energy policy and combating global warming. He supports a cap and trade program that will put us on the right path to solving this crisis. I'm confident, as president he will stand up for wildlife and the environment in a bipartisan way and will do more for our cause than any other candidate. Mark H

If Obama could do one thing...

Lauren Rosenthal — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:56:24 EST

IN case you need one reason to give people to support Obama for president read the following article that I believe was published in the NY Times on December 21.

Obama’s ‘One Thing’

By Michael Falcone

EXETER, N.H. — For the second day in a row, the Obama campaign gathered a small group of voters on Thursday to meet with the presidential candidate in an “informal” setting — informal that is if these local residents didn’t mind the bright television lights and a couple dozen reporters listening to their every word.

The day’s theme: the independent voter.

And in that spirit, one member of the group of six New Hampshire independents who met with Senator Obama at the Loaf and Ladle restaurant here posed a question that seemed to stump him for a moment.

“If you could make one change in the world, enact one piece of legislation — one thing, that’s all you’re going to get through in your presidency — what would it be?” asked Peter Colby of Rye, N.H.

After thinking it over for a few seconds, Mr. Obama offered this response:

“I would enact a bold energy policy because I think that we could save so much money, engineer such a resurgence in our economy and solve climate change all at one time. And it would improve our national security posture. So you get a three-fer. It helps our environment, our economy and our national security and it would free up resources over time to deal with what I think is the most important domestic issue which is health care, and I think it would help us strategically on the international stage.”

Foregoing the war in Iraq and other hot-button issues, Mr. Obama went with what seemed like a more technocratic answer. Nevertheless, Mr. Colby said he was pleased by Mr. Obama’s choice.

“We went to the moon in ten years,” he said. “We should be able to do it.”

Mr. Obama agreed, “We should be able to do it.”

Fuel prices, global warming, energy independence--what's your issue?

Lauren Rosenthal — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:31:36 EST

We want to hear from you. If you are reading this you came to the Environmentalists for Obama web page, so we are guessing you care about the environment and about Obama's positions on environmental issues. What issues are most important to you? What state are you in? Is it use of bottled water, oil exploration in Alaska, conservation of natural areas, global warming (it's 60 degrees today in Chicago), alternative energy????

RSVP

Don't Hug a Tree...

Cameron Davis — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:33:28 EST

If you want to save the environment, don’t hug a tree. Get a college student or 20-something involved.

That’s one of the lessons from Obama’s win in Iowa. I was working in the Obama Headquarters "Boiler Room" last night and it was great to see the progression through the evening. Edwards started out strong. About 30 minutes later, the three top candidates were even. And after that, Barack's numbers took off and never went backwards, stopping at 37% to Edwards's 30% and Clinton's 29%. One of the key stats from the caucus is that as many voters age 17-29 as voters 65 and older participated last night. In previous years senior participation has been 5-times greater than younger voters. This is why we need Barack Obama to be president to save the environment: he can bring new people together for critical causes (like saving the future of the planet).

Most of the friends and family I’ve talked to over the past year know I care about the environment and that he’s my candidate. But the number one thing I hear is: “I’ll vote for him, but can he win?” Last night’s victory proved he can win and is winning. So, now’s the time to get in touch with your friends and family in other states. Please urge them to vote for Obama in their primary. See http://www.vote-smart.org/election_president_state_primary_dates.php for a calendar of state primaries. If your friends care about the environment, tell them to check out his stances online at http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/. If the environment isn’t “their issue,” then plug them into Obama’s victory speech last night at http://www.barackobama.com/index.php. It will rank as one of the top political speeches of our time and perfectly captures not just his, but our vision for the future.

Since meeting and starting to work with Barack a decade ago this year, I've been impressed by his earnestness and his commitment to the public interest. And, best of all, he succeeds by getting new people engaged – something we saw last night in Iowa judging by the number of young people who turned out – and something that's critical if we’re going to leave cleaner water, air and land to the next generation.

Thank You Iowa!

Kelly from Barrington, IL — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:03 EST

Wow! Thank you citizens of Iowa! You have clearly told the world that you think Barack Obama is the best Democratic leader for the United State. You also provided an inspiring demonstration of how well the democratic election process can work, something especially poignant in light of what has recently taken place in Pakistan and Kenya.

Barack Obama’s message of HOPE and CHANGE that we can believe in has clearly struck a chord with Iowans and will continue to strongly resonate with voters in New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina.

I can’t wait to be in New Hampshire this Tuesday when Obama’s momentum continues to surge, eventually clinching the Democratic nomination for president of the United States.

Senator Obama on EPA ruling--WE NEED HIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOW

Lauren Rosenthal — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:03:30 EST

Obama Statement on EPA Ruling

"This week's decision by the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent California and 17 other states from implementing higher fuel economy standards is yet another example of how this Adminstration has put corporate interests ahead of the public interest. If the courts do not overturn this decision, I will after I am elected president."

THAT SAYS IT ALL. LET'S GET THIS MAN TO THE WHITE HOUSE.

Senator Obama on BALI

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:15:07 EST

Personally, I cannot wait until we go to international environmental conferences with a delegation sent by President Obama.

Earlier this week Senator Obama issued the following statement about the BALi negotiations:

"The post-Kyoto climate negotiations that have kicked off in Bali offer
an important opportunity for America to re-engage with the rest of the
world in taking on one of the greatest challenges of this generation.
But we must start by showing the world that we are serious about
tackling the climate crisis here at home, which is why I've put forth a
bold energy plan that would reduce our carbon emissions 80% by 2050. As
President, I will also personally reach out to the leaders of the
biggest carbon emitting nations and ask them to join America in creating
a new Global Energy Forum that can continue the work begun in Bali and
lay the foundation for the next generation of climate protocols."

Senator Obama on the Energy Bill

Lauren Rosenthal — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:08:13 EST

FYI this statement was released by Senator Obama's DC office earlier this week on the Energy Bill:

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) today released the
following statement on the passage of the Energy Bill (H.R.6), which
passed by a vote of 86-8:

"Our nation's energy crisis requires bold solutions, and the Senate
took an important step yesterday towards reducing both our dependence
on foreign oil and the harmful emission of greenhouse gases. Mirroring
a bipartisan proposal I have introduced the past two years, the Senate
passed legislation to end a 20-year stalemate over CAFE standards and
raise the fuel economy of cars and trucks to an average of 35 mpg by
2020.

"The Senate bill also recognizes that the efforts of family farmers
and local ethanol producers who have grown the ethanol industry from
the ground up are being threatened by the oil industry's desire to
reduce competition in the marketplace. By expanding the Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS) to 36 billion gallons by 2022, this bill will help
stabilize the ethanol market, weaken Big Oil's vise-like control over
gasoline
pricing, and set in motion the development of cellulosic biomass
technologies that will reduce our dependence on foreign oil and
address climate change. I am also pleased that the RFS now includes
provisions for lower carbon biofuels and new targets for biodiesel,
which I have championed.

"Although this legislation is a significant accomplishment, I am
disappointed that opponents blocked the renewable electricity standard.
Also, with the price of oil over $90 a barrel, some chose again to put
corporate interests above the people's interests by blocking efforts
to redirect tax breaks from the oil and gas industry to clean,
renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power.

"I commend Senator Bingaman and Leader Reid for their leadership in
making this legislation a priority, and encourage my colleagues in the

House to quickly move this bill forward."