This is a letter I wrote to President Obama in response to the Obama Administration's current attempts to expand the legal justification for the illegal warrantless spying program inherited from Bush (you know, the one Obama was supposed to disband rather than try and make new legal loop holes for).
I have a link to an article here, not the greatest news site, but they have links to the full text of the DOJ court filings to dismiss suits against the government, and severly limit people's ability to file future suits against the government to protect their Constitutional rights.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_Administration_quietly_expands_Bushs_legal_0407.html
---Begin Letter---
Dear President Obama,
In February of last year you said: "There is no reason why telephone companies should be given blanket immunity to cover violations of the rights of the American people - we must reaffirm that no one in this country is above the law."
In July you then instead voted to grant immunity to those very companies while they were in court for violating the rights of the American people. You insisted this was a necessary compromise, and gave us the following assurances:
You supported the FISA court as the exclusive means of legal domestic government wiretapping:
"The exclusivity provision [of the FISA Amendment Act] makes it clear to any President or telecommunications company that no law supersedes the authority of the FISA court. In a dangerous world, government must have the authority to collect the intelligence we need to protect the American people. But in a free society, that authority cannot be unlimited. As I've said many times, an independent monitor must watch the watchers to prevent abuses and to protect the civil liberties of the American people. This compromise law assures that the FISA court has that responsibility."
You acknowledged that blocking legal action in the courts weakens deterrents against and accountability for illegal wiretapping:
"[The FISA Amendment Act] grants retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that may have violated the law by cooperating with the Bush Administration's program of warrantless wiretapping. This potentially weakens the deterrent effect of the law and removes an important tool for the American people to demand accountability for past abuses."
And you pledged to reform the system to prevent future abuses and protect civil liberty:
"I do so with the firm intention -- once I’m sworn in as President -- to have my Attorney General conduct a comprehensive review of all our surveillance programs, and to make further recommendations on any steps needed to preserve civil liberties and to prevent executive branch abuse in the future."
Now, barely two months into office, your DOJ has done exactly the opposite. It has filed to dismiss suits against the government involving warrantless wiretapping, and further expanded the corrupt Bush interpretation of state secrets and sovereign immunity. The abuse of executive power you pledged to prevent in the future, your DOJ is now expanding. The warrantless wiretapping program created by Bush to circumvent the very FISA court you agreed was the exclusive legal means of wiretapping American citizens, is likewise now deemed to be legal by your DOJ. And since the previous immunity for telecoms didn't weaken deterrent or accountability for illegal spying enough, the grounds given for dismissing the cases against the government is that the government can't be sued, even for actions which are willfully and intentional in violation of existing law, unless the government willfully disclosed the information they illegally obtained.
Given this track record so far I guess we can expect your continued protection of Bush Administration officials against torture charges and investigations. We can expect you to keep hiding the Bush torture memos instead of releasing them to the public. We can expect you to merely relocate Guantanamo detainees in new places, closing the prison only in name. We can expect a trillion more dollars to be thrown at CEOs while we get laid off by them (Geithner and Summer's PPIP plan is just more privatized profits with socialized risks, and it stinks of corruption). We can expect more promises of European style services without admitting they will require European style taxes. We can expect future bailout programs to be crafted, like the current ones, behind closed doors and without the input of other ideas or people outside the Wall Street/Washington bubble your administration is quickly falling into. This isn't what we campaigned for, and it's certainly not what we voted for.
Hi All,
Terri S. sent me this link to give spread around. I hope everyone will visit it and pass the link.
All you have to do is visit the animal rescue site and click on the box. They will donate a small amount of food to rescued animals for each click they get, and they are not getting enough clicks right now.
Please help them help animals. It's simple, quick and free, and does a world of good. Please pass on to others that might be interested in helping.
Thanks,
Terri S.
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/clickToGive/home.faces?siteId=3
Loveya,
Duane
Video the Vote is calling on you to help us document issues of voter suppression and disenfranchisement on Election Day 2008 in Your Community!!We need strong leaders to serve as: Local Producers, Shooters and Team Leaders on Election Day to protect the vote and ensure our civil liberties!We can stop vote suppression in it's tracks. I am member of Video the vote. The republicans are still very active in vote suppression. Also we can report problems with voting devices and to document any activity. We need your help to prevent another Florida in 2000 or Ohio in 2004. We will have the time before the elctorial college votes to show the senate any irregularities during this election.
Video The Vote (www.videothevote.org) is a nonpartisan Voter Protection project, which aims to protect the vote by being the eyes and ears where ballots are cast and counted on Election Day 2008. With the help of our partners (Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, Common Cause, Voter Action, People for the American Way, Color of Change, Rock the Vote, Working Assets, many more), and an army of nation-wide citizen dispatchers, videographers and reporters, we will document and report any irregularities that occur at polling places and boards of elections while they are happening, enabling the media and public to watch-dog the electoral process and document issues of voter-suppression across our country. Like any grassroots effort, this campaign depends on the participation of as many people as possible.Do MORE than vote on November 4, 2008! Video the Vote! Help protect the vote! Protect your community! Visit www.videothevote.org or email danie@videothevote.org to get involved today!!!
You are The Boss... which team would you hire?With America facing historic debt, multiple war fronts, stumbling health care, a weakened dollar, all-time high prison population, skyrocketing Federal spending, mortgage crises, bank foreclosures, Republican adminstration nationalizing public traded financial institutions and threatening war with Russia, etc. etc., all in all this is an unusually critical election year.Let's look at the educational background of your two options:Obama:Occidental College - Two years.Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in international relations.Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude& Biden:University of Delaware - B.A. in history and B.A. in political science.Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)vs.McCain:United States Naval Academy - Class rank 894 of 899& Palin:Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semesterNorth Idaho College - 2 semesters - general studyUniversity of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalismMatanuska-Susitna College - 1 semesterUniversity of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in journalism
I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight..... * If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic, different." But.... * Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, yours is a quintessential American story. * If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim. * Name your kids Willow, Trig, Bristol and Track, you're a maverick. * Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable. * Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded. * If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience. * If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive. * If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian. * If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian. * If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society. * If , while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant , you're very responsible. * If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America's. * If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DUI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable. OK, much clearer now.
* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic, different." But.... * Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, yours is a quintessential American story. * If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim. * Name your kids Willow, Trig, Bristol and Track, you're a maverick. * Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable. * Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded. * If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience. * If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive. * If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian. * If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian. * If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society. * If , while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant , you're very responsible. * If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America's. * If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DUI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable. OK, much clearer now.
After his inverterbrate flip-flop on FISA, I lost interest in campaigning for Obama.
Recently a volunteer called and asked me to help, and I've been pondering the subject. To be honest, the only thing so far that might inspire me to help is the ~10% chance that McCain might die in office. But really even the theoretical notion of "Palin 09" isn't quite enough to push me into action.
Tonight I gather Barack was on Fox News with O'Reilly. I have not seen the video so I can only judge by two text reports.
1. Fox News: Obama: Surge Succeeded beyond our wildest dreams
2. MSNBC News: Iraqi surge exceeded expectations, Obama says
Violence maybe down ... but why ?
1. The "Awakening" in Anbar province where groups were paid by the American military to patrol neighborhoods and to fight against other Sunni insurgents. Was that part of the 'surge' or pre surge?
2. Ethnic/Religious cleansing in Baghdad. Not something that seems to be mentioned as going on. And with good reason ... people get upset about it ... be it Kosovo or Georgia or Rwanda.
Here is a map that shows population shifts in Baghdad from July 2006 to July 2007.
Is that a success beyond wildest expectations ?
It seems really sad to see something we detest elsewhere is described as a victory!
gryff :)
When I first heard that Palin had been chosen as McCain's running mate, I thought the name seemed familiar, but couldn't place her. Later I was looking up some information about the aerial slaughter of wolves in Alaska about which I had received several emails. Turns out, Palin and her allies in the Alaska legislature had been in the forefront of the efforts to condone the culling of wolves and other carnivores from the air. Using airplanes and helicopters they stalk and destroy these animals in an effort to increase the herds of caribou and moose for hunting. She and her cohorts spent $400,00 to publicize and promote this slaughter. It is now legal in Alaska to shoot animals from the air.
This is not the only incident in her war on the environment, despite Republican claims that she is an environmentalist. She has filed a lawsuit against the Federal Government to prevent the classification of polar bears as an endangered species, although it has been predicted that they will be at 30% of their present number in 50 years. The reason she gave is that it would interfere with oil production. This is the woman who "stood up to the oil companies."
Palin does not believe that there is a human component to global warming. She says "the verdict is still out on that one." This is in the face of reports by the vast majority of the world's scientists that we are in the midst of global warming and that it is primarily manmade. How long should we wait till the verdict comes in? Maybe when the world's coasts are innundated and famine strikes the world's food supply.
We must get out the word on this Annie Oakley moose-killer. She and McCain must not get into office. Go volunteer to get Barack Obama elected.
Please check out the attached video and contact your congressional representatives and Senators and urge them to vote to outlaw this aerial slaughter.
http://action.defenders.org/site/R?i=QQnyHTAB5-V5Z2rIzsi_rg..
A Wikapedia editor discovered early yesterday morning that someone had been editing Ms. Palin's profile. They had spent hours deleting negative things like her beauty pagent career, anti-environment stance etc. and enhancing or adding the positive aspects. They traced it to an ip address that had only been used once to edit Palin's profile. More information on the link below.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94118849&sc=emaf
~::~ *Delaware Senator Joe Biden* Is Barack Obama's Announced Choice For His Vice President. ~::~
http://AuthorsDen.Com/ShivaniSannyasini
~::~ Shivani Sannyasini ~::~
The following is an edited summary of something by someone who I usually disagree with, but I agree with what I am presenting here:
For, without any visible strategy for victory, Obama is recommending the same course LBJ took. Johnson bombed North Vietnam in 1964, landed Marines in 1965 and built U.S. forces from 16,000 advisers on Nov. 22, 1963, to 525,000 troops in January of 1969.The Soviet Union, whose 115,000-man army in Afghanistan reached more than twice the size of U.S.-NATO forces went home defeated in 1988. The Soviet Empire did not survive that humiliation.Obama should, before committing any more combat brigades, explain how and when this war ends in an American victory. For as of today, the Afghan war resembles Vietnam far more than Iraq ever did.
I received this letter in response to my concerns about expanding Bush's faith-based initiatives. I am not necessarily convinced, but if there are enforced safeguards to prevent corruption and discrimination it might be a bit more palatable. It is clear to me that mixing religion and politics is never a good idea no matter the good intentions. If you need any evidence we have a history replete with witch burnings, inquisitions, jihads, pograms, crusades and wars fought solely in the name of gods and between different groups of beleivers in the same god. And, we have the current administration's example of using religious predjudice against certain members of our society to gain political favor and feigned religious beliefs to coerce the conservative Christians into supporting them. We have also seen the negative influence of religion in this presidential campaign from Rev. Wright and his racist and hate-filled rhetoric and the Catholic Priest ridiculing Hillary Clinton in the pulpit to McCains active courting of Hagee and his ant-Semetic, anti-catholic, homophobic and incendary remarks. Religion or the lack thereof is a private matter between you and whatever god you claim, and should not be used as a political ploy.
Dear Friend,Thank you for contacting Senator Obama about his plan to engage faith-based and community organizations as government partners in providing social services to those in need. Senator Obama firmly believes in the separation between church and state, and he will abide by a set of principles that will ensure this new initiative honors that constitutional mandate. For example, organizations that apply for new funding from Obama programs will not be able to discriminate on the basis of religion in hiring. In these programs, government funds may only be used for secular programs and initiatives, not for proselytizing or teaching religion. Senator Obama believes that we need all hands on deck to help people in need, regardless of their backgrounds or where they live, and that government should work with both secular and faith-based partners to this end. Secular and faith-based organizations each bring unique expertise in providing critical human services, whether that’s keeping veterans off the street, feeding the hungry, or rehabilitating ex-offenders. We should not discriminate against successful service providers just because they are affiliated with a faith community. As long as they follow some basic rules and are effective in delivery of services, faith-based organizations should be able to partner with the government, as they have done for decades. Most faith-based groups hire religiously diverse staffs and have long operated within anti-discrimination laws, and Barack believes that these programs can provide good models for helping people in need while upholding the core constitutional principle of separation of church and state. Senator Obama has been clear that faith-based initiatives in his administration will be markedly different from President Bush’s program. Barack is committed to a full review of Bush Administration policy and its effects, and to reversing any regulations that were politically motivated or sought to legalize discrimination. To learn more about Senator Obama’s views on faith and politics, please click here: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/faith/Thank you again for contacting us.Sincerely,Obama for America-------------------Paid for by Obama for America