You all did it!
I moved to Carmel from Baton Rouge, LA, and it was there that I wanted to hear more of Sen. Obama's plans to run for the chief executive position. I was going to support Sen. Clinton. As I researched Sen. Obama's position on major issues, and heard him speak out with increasing frequency, it became clear that I was feeling him.
In Jan. 08 my family and I decided to get involved here in Hamilton County and had no clue that this was the heart of Republican territory. Over the past year I became very busy on my job and could not spare a moment to give to the campagin. Thanks to Diane Smart's help from the Chicago ofc. who guided me through a few events. Then came Lily West, whom I consider one of the best raw political talents I ever laid my eyes on (and I have been in this game since the early 1980s) in many cities. And the sweet Beatina Theapold, whom held it all together here in Hamilton County as the state needed Lily in Indy. Below is a tally of how we did:
Carmel, Indiana for Obama'08 is making a difference together.
Activity Index 10 out of 10
Carmel, Indiana for Obama'08 STATS
# of Members 166
Events Hosted 564
Events Attended 2,198
Calls made 11,782
Doors Knocked 333
Number of blog posts 11,306
Amount raised $107,944.55
You all deserve a big THANKS!!!!
<img src=”http://www.barackobama.com/images/email/08/oct/debatewatch3_e.jpg”>
The final presidential debate is this Wednesday, October 15th, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern. It's the last chance for undecided voters to see Barack and John McCain side-by-side and determine who will bring the change this country needs. You can make the most of this opportunity by bringing your friends, family, and fellow supporters together to watch. Sign up to host a Debate Watch Party. We'll make sure you have everything you need to make the event a success. If you've hosted an event before, you know how powerful they can be to help grow our movement. If you haven't, it's a terrific way to show your support, and we'll be with you every step of the way to help. We're having a special conference call for Debate Watch Party hosts next week. We'll give you ideas for how to get your guests involved in the rest of the campaign. In these final weeks, each of us needs to do whatever we can to keep growing our movement and encourage undecided voters to cast their vote for change. Sign up to host a Debate Watch Party now: http://my.barackobama.com/debate-watch-party Thanks, Jon Jon Carson National Field Director Obama for America
This message came from J J Hopkins and I could not have said it better.
Democratic Pollster Peter Hart said these are the questions undecided voters have about Barack.--
"Is he one of us? Is he safe? Does he love America?"
Because they dont know him, if these qustions were answered, he would have their support. Here's how to answer these questions,,,let Barack do what he does best--
Hard to believe, but there are ALOT of people, UNDECIDED VOTERS among them, who have never heard Barack's famous "not a red America, not a blue America, but the UNITED States of America" speech. Imagine what a difference it would make if EVERY voter in IN and NC heard it. That's not possible, but we can make a real, targeted difference. Most undecided voters are not voting on issues, but their GUT...how they FEEL about the candidate. Let's do our part, door to door, block by block... . I encourage you to download the speech and 'burn' it onto a DVD to give away. Directions below... 2004 Democratic National Convention Speech P1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awQkJNVsgKM Convention Speech P2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UDKXKGZ3PY&feature=related HOW TO TRANSFER VIDEOS TO DVD: Here's how to download videos and transfer to dvd-
...or call your nearest geek...or your Obama office volunteers to help you,.
To see a complete VIDEO/AUDIO ARCHIVE of SPEECHES, go here
The Utter Fallacy of the Popular Vote Argument
While a vigorous debate could be held over the merits of choosing delegates by means of a primary election vs. a caucus (and there are clearly some very valid arguments for each), this is nonetheless an irrelevant issue at present. The entire DNC, including members of Clinton’s team, helped to craft the present system and agreed to abide by it many months ago. Yet, we continue to hear Senator Clinton argue that the “popular” vote is what ultimately matters most.
To illustrate the utter fallacy of this argument, consider Oklahoma and its slightly larger neighbor, Colorado. Oklahoma has 2.2 million registered voters, 61% Democratic or Independent, Colorado has 2.9 million registered voters, 65% Democratic or Independent.
In Oklahoma’s primary, Clinton gained a net lead of 10 delegates and 98,350 votes over Obama by virtue of a 23.6% victory.
In Colorado’s caucus, Obama gained a net lead of 15 delegates and 41,274 votes over Clinton by virtue of a 34.2% victory.
Even though Obama's margin of victory was 45% larger than Clinton's, her popular vote total was 238% higher (314% if we adjust for voter registration). Note however, that the delegate totals scale correctly with respect to the winning percentages, i.e. he received about 45% more delegates.
The point is painfully obvious if you recall anything whatsoever from high school algebra. Two oranges plus five apples doesn’t equal seven of either. The delegate count is the only meaningful measure, as it is a normalized representation of the voter intent in states with different polling procedures. Of the 17 caucuses held, Senator Clinton has only won the delegate count (by 1) in American Samoa. Four of the caucus states don't even report popular vote counts, and in the caucuses of Washington and Minnesota, states much larger than Colorado and Oklahoma, Obama comfortably won by more than a 2-1 margin. Therefore, simply counting the raw "popular" vote significantly under represents the actual number of voters supporting Senator Obama.
Of course there will be opponents who disagree, since a caucus turnout is generally smaller than a primary. Here again, mathematics tells the true story. Professional statisticians routinely conduct national polls encompassing roughly a thousand individuals, and do so with error margins of plus or minus a few percent. The total vote in Colorado’s caucus was more than one hundred times this amount (118,952), making the probability of selecting the incorrect winner less than the likelihood of being struck by lightning.
James McBride, Ph.D.
1647 Windy Ridge Court
Saline, MI 48176
734-944-3102
I've gotten very backlogged, so I'm obviously not doing these stories justice just by linking them all. Still! There's something to be said for relaying. Which Democrat Has the Administrative Experience to Be An Effective President? Compare How Well They've Managed Their Campaigns
None of the presidential candidates has experience managing a large executive branch agency or serving as governor. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain have all served as legislators, but never in executive office.The largest organization any of them have led is their respective campaigns. So if you want to learn something about how well they will manage the people in their administrations, you can learn a lot by seeing how well they have managed the people in their campaign organizations.
Deep into a primary campaign that was supposed be over by now, Barack Obama must still answer one fundamental question. Jeremiah Wright notwithstanding, it's not whether he's too black. It's whether he's too green. Hillary Clinton has made Obama's inexperience her chief line of attack, and if she goes down, John McCain will pick up where she left off. Luckily, Obama doesn't have to rely on his legislative résumé to prove he's capable of running the government. He can point to something more germane: the way he's run his campaign.Presidents tend to govern the way they campaigned. Jimmy Carter ran as a moralistic outsider in 1976, and he governed that way as well, refusing to compromise with a Washington establishment that he distrusted (and that distrusted him). Ronald Reagan's campaign looked harsh on paper but warm and fuzzy on TV, as did his presidency. The 1992 Clinton campaign was like the Clinton administration: brilliant and chaotic, with a penchant for near-death experiences. And the 2000 Bush campaign presaged the Bush presidency: disciplined, hierarchical, loyal and ruthless.Of the three candidates still in the 2008 race, Obama has run the best campaign by far. McCain's was a top-heavy, slow-moving, money-hemorrhaging Hindenburg that eventually exploded, leaving the Arizona senator to resurrect his bankrupt candidacy through sheer force of will. Clinton's campaign has been marked by vicious infighting and organizational weakness, as manifested by her terrible performance in caucus states.
Cross-posted to my blogspot journal.
Disclaimer: I don't feel that all of these questions are of dreadful importance (the pastor issue, the adultery issue, etc.) but through all the Democratic infighting, McCain's sitting by totally clean. If he were subjected to the kind of inquiry and scrutiny that Democrats are facing, these are the issues we would be hearing about.10 Debate Questions John McCain Will Never Be Asked
1. Do you agree with Pastor John Hagee that war with Iran is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy?In February, you shared a stage with Pastor John Hagee and said you were "very proud" to have his endorsement. You also called the Reverend Rod Parsley, a man who said of Islam "America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed", your "spiritual guide." Do you believe America's mission is to destroy Islam? Do you join Pastor Hagee in believing the United States must attack Iran to fulfill the biblical prophecy of Armageddon in Israel in which 144,000 Jews will be converted to Christianity and the rest killed? Is that why you joked about "bomb bomb Iran?" If not, why will you not renounce the support of Hagee and Parsley? 2. Doesn't your legendary temper make you too dangerous to be trusted with the presidency of the United States?Your anger, even toward friends and allies, is legendary. You purportedly dropped the F-Bomb on your own GOP colleagues John Cornyn and Chuck Grassley. In the book, The Real McCain, author Cliff Schechter claims you got into a fist-fight with your fellow Arizona Republican Rick Renzi. Allegedly, you even publicly used a crude term, one which decorum and the FCC prohibit us from even saying on the air, to describe your own wife. Which if any of these episodes is untrue? Don't your anger management problems make you too dangerously unstable to be president of the United States? 3. Doesn't your confusion regarding basic facts about the war in Iraq, including repeatedly citing a nonexistent Al Qaeda-Iran alliance, make you unfit for command?On four occasions in one month, you confused friend and foe in Iraq by describing Sunni Al Qaeda as being backed by Shiite Iran. Then you showed a misunderstanding of the U.S. chain of command when you claimed you would not back shifting forces from Iraq to Afghanistan "unless Gen. [David] Petraeus said that he felt that the situation called for that," a decision which Petraeus himself told you and your Senate colleagues only the week before rests not with him but with his superiors. Doesn't your lack of understanding and judgment when it comes to basic facts of America's national security disqualify you as commander-in-chief? 4. Given your past adultery, should Americans consider you a moral exemplar of family values?You are the nominee of a Republican Party which claims to support so-called "family values." Yet you commenced an adulterous relationship with your current wife Cindy months before the dissolution of your previous marriage to your first wife Carol. Should Americans consider you to be a moral exemplar of family values? 5. Doesn't your flip-flop on Jerry Falwell being an "agent of intolerance" show your opportunistic pandering to the religious right?In 2000, you famously called the late Jerry Falwell "an agent of intolerance," a statement which may have cost you the decisive South Carolina primary. But as you ramped up your next presidential run in 2006, you embraced Falwell and gave the commencement address at his Liberty University. When Tim Russert asked that spring if you still considered him an agent of intolerance, you said, "'no, I don't." Why shouldn't the American people consider you a flip-flopping opportunist who cynically courted the religious right to further your 2008 presidential ambitions? 6. Given your wealth and privileged upbringing, aren't you - and not Barack Obama - the elitist?You have called Barack Obama an elitist. Yet you recently returned to your exclusive private high school, one which now costs over 38,000 dollars a year to attend. Your wife is the heiress to a beer distribution company, reputedly owns 8 homes and has a net worth well over $100 million. Your children all attended private schools, academies which also happened to be the primary beneficiaries of funds from your supposed charitable foundation. Shouldn't the American people in fact view you as the elitist, and a hypocritical one at that? 7. What is your religion, really? And has the answer in the past changed as the South Carolina primary approached?I want to ask about your seemingly ever-changing religious beliefs. In June 2007, McClatchy reported, "McCain still calls himself an Episcopalian." In August 2007, as ABC reported, your campaign staff identified you as "Episcopalian" in a questionnaire prepared for ABC News' August 5 debate. But as the primary in evangelical-rich South Carolina neared, in September 2007 you said of your religious faith, "It plays a role in my life. By the way, I'm not Episcopalian. I'm Baptist." But in March 2008, Pastor Dan Yeary of your North Phoenix Baptist Church refused to comment on why you have refused to finally undergo a baptism ceremony. Congressional directories still list you as an Episcopalian. In the past, you've said, "When I'm asked about it, I'll be glad to discuss it." So what is your religion? And couldn't Americans be forgiven for assuming your changing faith is tied to your changing political needs? 8. Didn't President Bush betray you with his signing statement on the Detainee Treatment Act? You claim to be against torture, but aren't you a hypocrite for voting "no" on the Senate waterboaring ban?You've said that "we can't torture or treat inhumanely suspected terrorists we have captured". And in December 2005, you famously reached a compromise with President Bush on the Detainee Torture Act banning cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of detainees. But just two weeks later, President Bush issued a signing statement making it clear he would ignore the compromise you just reached. Then in February 2007, you voted "no" on a Senate bill banning waterboarding. Isn't it fair to say President Bush betrayed you with his December 30, 2005 signing statement? And isn't it fair to say you caved to the right-wing of your party on the issue in order to win the Republican nomination? 9. Why did you flip-flop on the Bush tax cuts you twice opposed? Why do you now support making them permanent for the wealthiest Americans who need them least?You twice voted against the Bush tax cuts. Now you support making them permanent. In 2001, you said, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief." Now, according to the Center for American Progress, your tax plan would cost more than $2 trillion over the next decade and "would predominantly benefit the most fortunate taxpayers, offering two new massive tax cuts for corporations and delivering 58 percent of its benefits to the top 1 percent of taxpayers." Isn't it true that you flip-flopped on the Bush tax cuts? Isn't it fair to say that you now favor a massive expansion of the federal budget deficit in order to fund a tax giveaway to the wealthiest Americans who need it least? 10. With the economy tanking, shouldn't Americans be concerned over your past statements that "the issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should?"Americans consistently report that the economy is the issue that concerns them most. Yet more than once, you proclaimed your ignorance when it comes to the economy. In November 2005, you told the Wall Street Journal, "I'm going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." Then in December 2007, you admitted, "The issue of economics is not something I've understood as well as I should." Shouldn't the American be worried about President McCain's ability to lead the United States out of recession? Given your past statements, shouldn't the American reject out of hand your claim that "I know the economy better than Senator Clinton and Senator Obama do?"
Well, I mean, not that she's wrong. Hillary would have much more success in a country where Democrats weren't paying attention to what a scumbag she is. But what a thing to say in a political climate where increased voter turnout is supposed to be a good thing. Except, evidently, for when they vote for someone else. Clinton trashes "activists" and MoveOn at closed-door fundraiser
"Moveon.org endorsed [Sen. Barack Obama] -- which is like a gusher of money that never seems to slow down," Clinton said to a meeting of donors. "We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that's what we're dealing with. And you know they turn out in great numbers. And they are very driven by their view of our positions, and It's primarily national security and foreign policy that drives them. I don't agree with them. They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me."MoveOn's Eli Pariser responded:"Senator Clinton has her facts wrong again. MoveOn never opposed the war in Afghanistan, and we set the record straight years ago when Karl Rove made the same claim. Senator Clinton's attack on our members is divisive at a time when Democrats will soon need to unify to beat Senator McCain. MoveOn is 3.2 million reliable voters and volunteers who are an important part of any winning Democratic coalition in November. They deserve better than to be dismissed using Republican talking points."
In a newly released campaign recording today, Hillary Clinton blamed "the activist base of the Democratic Party" and MoveOn.org for her repeated losses throughout the election, and accused both of voter intimidation.(snip)The audio of this is available over at Huffington Post. As a highly informed Democrat who takes an active role in my country's politics, I reject and denounce Senator Clinton's statements. This is just further evidence that Hillary Clinton will viciously attack *ANYONE* who decides for any reason that Barack Obama is the superior, more intelligent, more conservative candidate.And no, I don't mean conservative in the sense of neoconservatives... who are, in fact, willing to disregard intelligence and common sense in order to risk everything for their hollow dreams of a global Pax Americana. I mean conservative in the best possible sense... prudence, care, and a nuanced approach to foriegn policy, rather than the kind of hamfisted hackery we've seen over the past seven years, going into not one, but *TWO* simultaneous longterm occupations, with no exit strategy for either of them. (snip)So yes, we Democratic activists do "turn out in great numbers" to vote for Barack Obama... but we're not some kind of infestation, Senator Clinton. We're reasonable, rational Americans who are fed up with Bush-era incompetence... the kind that you bought into, hook, line, and sinker. We're Americans, Hillary. And your belittling of Democrats who actually give a damn about their country is an elitist statement that insults us all.
Hard to believe, but there are ALOT of people, UNDECIDED VOTERS among them, who have never heard Barack's famous "not a red America, not a blue America, but the UNITED States of America" speech. Imagine what a difference it would make if EVERY voter in PA heard it. That's not possible, but we can make a real, targeted difference. Most undecided voters are not voting on issues, but their GUT...how they FEEL about the candidate. Let's do our part, door to door, block by block... . I encourage you to download the speech and 'burn' it onto a DVD to give away. Directions below... 2004 Democratic National Convention Speech P1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awQkJNVsgKM Convention Speech P2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UDKXKGZ3PY&feature=related HOW TO TRANSFER VIDEOS TO DVD: Here's how to download videos and transfer to dvd-
...or call your nearest geek.
These have been created by my.barackobama.com to help students in canvassing-- Barack Obama on EducationBarack Obama on the EnvironmentBarack Obama on the War in IraqBarack Obama on IsraelBarack Obama on EnergyBarack Obama on the Job MarketBarack Obama on Stem CellsBarack Obama on LGBT RightsBarack Obama on Women's Rights "Making College Affordable" flyer
Other Flyers to Download:Flyers are a great way to share information about Barack...pass them out in public spaces, share them with or leave them in key places; print them out and pass them along!
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/resourceflyers/
"My mother died of cancer at 53. In those last painful months, she was more worried about paying her medical bills than getting well. I hear stories like hers everyday.
For 20 years Washington has talked about health care reform and reformed nothing. I've got a plan to cut costs and cover everyone. But unless we stop the bickering and the lobbyists we will be in the same place twenty years from now."
-The typical American family will save up to $2,500 per year on medical costs.-Offering a new public health plan that will give individuals the choice to buy affordable health coverage that is similar to the plan available to federal employees. The new public plan will be open to individuals without access to group coverage through their workplace or current public programs. -Establishing a National Health Insurance Exchange to help individuals who wish to purchase an insurance plan for themselves. The Exchange will act as a watchdog group and help reform the private insurance market by creating rules and standards for participating insurance plans to ensure fairness and to make individual coverage more affordable and accessible.-Requiring all employers to make a meaningful contribution towards health coverage for their employees. -Mandating all children have health care coverage and expanding the number of options for young adults up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parent's plans. -Expanding eligibility for the Medicaid and SCHIP programs and ensure that these programs continue to serve their critical safety net function.
-The typical American family will save up to $2,500 per year on medical costs.
-Offering a new public health plan that will give individuals the choice to buy affordable health coverage that is similar to the plan available to federal employees. The new public plan will be open to individuals without access to group coverage through their workplace or current public programs.
-Establishing a National Health Insurance Exchange to help individuals who wish to purchase an insurance plan for themselves. The Exchange will act as a watchdog group and help reform the private insurance market by creating rules and standards for participating insurance plans to ensure fairness and to make individual coverage more affordable and accessible.
-Requiring all employers to make a meaningful contribution towards health coverage for their employees.
-Mandating all children have health care coverage and expanding the number of options for young adults up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parent's plans.
-Expanding eligibility for the Medicaid and SCHIP programs and ensure that these programs continue to serve their critical safety net function.
I encourage you to download some of the videos of Barack Obama's speeches and 'burn' them onto DVDs to give away. Seeing and hearing him speak is one of the best ways to recruit supporters.
2004 Democratic National Convention Speech P1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awQkJNVsgKM
Convention Speech P2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UDKXKGZ3PY&feature=related
Iowa Jefferson-Jackson Dinner Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tydfsfSQiYc
Iowa Caucus Victory Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqoFwZUp5vc
Yes We Can...NH Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fe751kMBwm
South Carolina Victory Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iVAPH_EcmQ
Super Tuesday Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dzHDzvTfzQ
Virginia Jefferson-Jackson Dinner http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hUngQ8-wLU
Potomac Primary Victory Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxd8x7UGOuo
Speech in San Antonio http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxvSqSXs0io
Barack Obama Speaks at Dr. King's Church http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf0x_TpDris
Barack Obama at Cooper Union http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSuT5zN2SPI
Obama Speech: 'A More Perfect Union' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrp-v2tHaDo
HOW TO TRANSFER VIDEOS TO DVD: Here's how to download videos and transfer to dvd-
Obama would enact a comprehensive plan to help bring an end to the foreclosure crisis that threatens millions of families. Obama supports efforts to create a new FHA Housing Security Program to provide significant incentives and guarantees for lenders to buy out mortgages that exceed the value of homes and convert them into stable 30-year fixed-rate mortgages that homeowners can afford. This is a responsible plan designed to help responsible homeowners without rewarding borrowers or investors who helped create the problem.
Obama would couple this plan with a direct interest-rate subsidy for low-and middle-income borrowers patterned on the mortgage interest deduction used by high-income itemizers, as well as with comprehensive credit counseling, additional aid for loan workouts and reform of the bankruptcy code.
Obama is now calling for a second stimulus package to help hardworking families and strengthen our middle class: making sure that we get money into the pockets of people who need it and invest in sustainable job growth, giving substantial permanent tax relief to seniors and working people --up to $1,000 per working family This would include extending unemployment benefits, helping those make ends meet while they're out of work, and make sure they're still spending money so we can keep the wheels of our economy turning.
Obama's called for a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years and generate nearly two million new jobs - many of them in the construction industry that's suffered during this housing crisis. And that's why he's proposed investing $150 billion in our green energy sector over the next ten years. This won't just help reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and it won't just help save this planet for our children. It will also create up to five million new jobs - and those are jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced.
Obama wiill work to insure that a housing crisis like this does not happen again by installing responsible oversight of credit markets that has been lacking -- on mortgages, but also on credit cards, which threaten to be the next version of the mortgage crisis. It also means increasing people's savings so they have something to fall back on; enacting his long-run savings program would give every worker in America a portable pension savings account.
The pollster Peter Hart says the central questions in the voters' minds are: "Is Hillary honest?" and "Is Obama safe?"
A PICTURE IS WORTH 1,000 WORDS:
We can answer these questions with 4 short videos you can burn on a DVD...instructions below...(or a mini video cd since more people have cd burners, and the discs are cheaper). The shorter videos will fit on the mini cds, which will make nice handouts to give to voters. You can also email the youtube video links to voters you know.
Don't let this happen again in PA.
BOSNIA-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQPqUAgkKl8
NAFTA-Hillary is claiming she fought NAFTA when she was First Lady. Her husband, was a strong supporter of the ill fated trade agreement and pushed it through Congress. This trade policy has cost millions of jobs, and states like Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania were extremely hard hit. Our jobs went to Mexico and thousands of middle class incomes soon followed.
1. A leader of the International Transport Workers Union was on an Obama media call last week stating he worked hard against NAFTA around Capital Hill and knew Mrs. Clinton was working equally hard for it. Now people lobbying always know who their opposition is, who is working the other argument. Everyone who followed that debate knew how hard the Clintons were pushing this trade bill.
2. Her First Lady schedules show she hosted several meetings about NAFTA and health care. They are claiming she was pushing healthcare over NAFTA. Those who attended these meetings have a different recollection.
David Shuster reports saying that Clinton helped get NAFTA approved--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG00SWAqcvw
3 AM PHONE AD
The Obama campaign produced this video, showing how it was made "scary", narrated by Casey Knowles, the sleeping young girl from Clinton's "3 a.m. Ad". Casey is grown now, a precinct captain for Barack, and rejects the politics of fear used in the ad. As she says at the end of this video, "I approve this message, and NOT that other one."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXmYVRIpu2w
HOW TO TRANSFER VIDEOS TO DVD ...or a mini video CD:
Here's how to download videos and transfer to dvd-
Now copy as many DVDs as you want to give to undecided voters who may be concerned about Hillary's TRUSTWORTHINESS, their jobs being lost to another country, or people who may persuaded by the 'politics of fear' to doubt who is capable of passing the 'Commander-in-chief' test. The best defense is a good offense.
