<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://my.barackobama.com">
  <channel>
    <title>Steven Clift&#039;s Blog</title>
    <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog_rss/stevenclift/html</link>
    <description>This is a demonstration.</description>
                        <item>
            <title>Ten Online Ideas for Obama in Government</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Here are ten quick ideas for the coming Obama administration. The GSA commissioned this article last year. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicus.net/articles/joinevolution.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF version&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicus.net/articles/joinevolution-long.pdf&quot;&gt;looong version with international examples is available&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ten Practical Online Steps for Government Support of Democracy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href=&quot;http://stevenclift.com&quot;&gt;Steven Clift&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chair, &lt;a href=&quot;http://e-democracy.org&quot;&gt;E-Democracy.Org&lt;/a&gt; and Ashoka Fellow&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article will appear in the upcoming Intergovernmental Solutions newsletter of the U.S. federal&lt;br /&gt;General Services Administration: http://tinyurl.com/2dhl9s&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does e-government have anything to do with democracy and citizen participation? Let&#039;s get&lt;br /&gt;straight to the point - not yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes. Government should be leading a charge into the increasingly and fundamentally interactive&lt;br /&gt;web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Information access, considered the safe starting point for government accountability online now&lt;br /&gt;mostly presents the public a daunting needle in a huge haystack. This system is so complicated&lt;br /&gt;that the valuable and substantive information that government produces is often ignored in the&lt;br /&gt;increasingly interactive public lives of active citizens. . The lack of real and effective online access&lt;br /&gt;to governance will substantially increase cynicism about and distrust in government among a&lt;br /&gt;public that demands a more participatory representative democracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A bit of context: I coordinated e-government for the State of Minnesota in its early days. As a&lt;br /&gt;citizen, I independently started E-Democracy.Org which created the world&amp;rsquo;s first election&lt;br /&gt;information and discussion website in 1994. When &amp;ldquo;services first, democracy later&amp;rdquo; enveloped&lt;br /&gt;most e-government projects, I went independent in late 1997. Since then, I&#039;ve spoken and&lt;br /&gt;consulted across 26 countries on &amp;quot;e-democracy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here are the 10 things I would do in government at every level to help rescue our democracy in&lt;br /&gt;the information age.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. Timely, personalized access to information that matters.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Government decision-making information is not really public or relevant if people cannot act on it&lt;br /&gt;when it still matters. Give people tools like personalized e-mail alerts based on keywords,&lt;br /&gt;location, etc. and eliminate the &amp;quot;nobody told me&amp;quot; backlash government often receives due to&lt;br /&gt;poor public outreach. Every government needs a &amp;ldquo;what&amp;rsquo;s new&amp;rdquo; democracy portal or a thematic&lt;br /&gt;section covering all democratic processes as part of their main website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Help elected officials receive and sort, then better understand and respond to email.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;E-mail overload is the number one complaint I hear from elected officials around the world. Most&lt;br /&gt;want to respond effectively, but simply aren&#039;t being provided the tools they need. If there ever&lt;br /&gt;was an opportunity for open source collaboration among governments, this is it. In general, our&lt;br /&gt;representatives and representative institutions must start to invest in the online infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;they need to connect directly with the public they represent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. Dedicate at least 10% of new e-government developments to democracy.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s define democracy starting with public input. In an e-service initiative, the 10% should start&lt;br /&gt;with citizen focus groups to guide the design of the service, usability testing and studies to&lt;br /&gt;generate user input and accountability, and post-transaction user surveys. If the investment is a&lt;br /&gt;new content management system for information access, then use the 10% to add&lt;br /&gt;personalization and survey input features or democratized navigation (those nifty menus that&lt;br /&gt;show you the top ten articles viewed that day or week).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. Announce all government public meetings on the Internet in a uniform manner.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All public meeting notices, agendas, handouts, and digital recordings must be online. The system&lt;br /&gt;should be standards-based and tie state-by-state systems into a national network covering&lt;br /&gt;federal, state, and local government public meetings. This is the only way for people to ask to be&lt;br /&gt;pro-actively notified of any government public meetings within a certain geographic area&lt;br /&gt;addressing specific topics that interest them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5. Allow citizens to look-up all of their elected officials from the very local to national&lt;br /&gt;in one search.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Along with the ability to look-up all public meetings, Americans should have the right to easily&lt;br /&gt;determine who all the elected and appointed officials are who represent them currently. Just&lt;br /&gt;before elected and appointed officials assume office, every government unit should be required&lt;br /&gt;to submit contact information for those officials into a national database.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;6. Host online public hearings and dialogues (or &amp;ldquo;e-consultations&amp;rdquo; as they are known&lt;br /&gt;outside the U.S.)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As in-person public meetings begin to incorporate live online features, envision more deliberate&lt;br /&gt;online exchanges to improve the outcomes of the decision-making process. If your government&lt;br /&gt;agency hosts three public hearings across the country or your state, host the fourth hearing&lt;br /&gt;online over a week or two and improve the format in the process. In 10 years, the legislatures,&lt;br /&gt;commissions and city councils not holding hearings online will be in the minority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;7. Embrace the rule of law by mandating the most democratically empowering online&lt;br /&gt;services and rights across the whole of government.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Technology itself is not forcing real institutional democratic change. I estimate that 90% of the&lt;br /&gt;democratic innovations online that really share power are based on a political tradition or law&lt;br /&gt;that existed before the Internet arrived. If we want all citizens to benefit universally from a more&lt;br /&gt;wired democracy, then now is time to update our legal requirements and fund core online&lt;br /&gt;democracy services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;8. Promote dissemination through access to raw data from decision-making&lt;br /&gt;information systems.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s explode decision-making data, like Congressional information and rulemaking related&lt;br /&gt;content into bits via XML and open standards and make it easy to re-use public government data&lt;br /&gt;from many sources to create views and searches that provide insight, understanding, and&lt;br /&gt;accountability. Think &amp;ldquo;Web 2.0&amp;rdquo; interactivity built on top of government data by those outside of&lt;br /&gt;government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9. Fund Open Source sharing internationally across e-government.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sharing and supporting open source software takes resources &amp;ndash; a consortium of national&lt;br /&gt;governments need to step up with collaborative funding. The new and less cluttered area of eparticipation tools are an ideal starting point within e-government to reduce technology costs and&lt;br /&gt;build systems for use by multiple governments.. Efforts to place modules and customizations out&lt;br /&gt;for community use will be key. Government and its vendors must contribute code back for the&lt;br /&gt;wheels of reciprocal value to start turning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;10. Local up &amp;ndash; a strategic approach to building local democracy online.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To build e-participation momentum, citizens need to experience results they can see and touch.&lt;br /&gt;By investing in transferable local models and tools, more people will use the Internet as a tool to&lt;br /&gt;strength their communities, protect and enrich their families and neighborhoods, and be heard in&lt;br /&gt;a meaningful way. Every community needs an &amp;ldquo;online town hall,&amp;rdquo; E-Democracy.Org calls them&lt;br /&gt;Issues Forums, for agenda-setting discussion of public issues. Comparative evaluation of access&lt;br /&gt;and participation related online service and content indicators will introduce efforts for an online&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Democracy Tune-up.&amp;quot; This same tune-up concept should be applied at the state and federal&lt;br /&gt;level as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the early days, folks thought the Internet was inherently democratic. Parts of it are, but that&lt;br /&gt;mistaken sense of technological determinisms has not carried over to make constitutional and&lt;br /&gt;legally-ground representative processes more open and responsive. Today, &amp;ldquo;politics as usual&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;online may actually make things worse. Civically conceived e-participation efforts need to counter&lt;br /&gt;such negative trends rather than being viewed as an extra option. Ultimately, each generation&lt;br /&gt;needs to rebuild democracy with the special tools of their time. Our tools are online and our&lt;br /&gt;democracy needs us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steven Clift leads the &amp;ldquo;Online Consultation and E-Participation&amp;rdquo; online community of practice at&lt;br /&gt;DoWire.Org and shares numerous articles on e-democracy from Publicus.Net. An extended&lt;br /&gt;version of this article with specific examples is available from that site.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stevenclift/gGxqZL</link>
            <comments>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stevenclift/gGxqZL/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:34:03 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stevenclift/gGxqZL</guid>
            <dc:creator>Steven from Minneapolis, MN</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Steven from Minneapolis, MN</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>1</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/comment_rss/gGxqZL/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>