Franklin Katunda's Blog

US-African Affairs: Clinton "Lost" in Translation in Congo

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:44:35 EDT

Lost in Translation

By Franklin Katunda

Washington DC -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked a very central question on US economic interests in Central Africa at a forum in Kinshasa, DR Congo. Unfortunately, an inquiry most Congolese have called insightful in regards to the US-Congo relations got “lost in translation”. Not only, had it lost its significance in the media coverage, but worst, given their slacking pleasure not to look into news tips and details, US media networks condensed it into another Clinton’s “saut d’humeur” sound bite.

A “key” question stolen by just another “sound bite”

This was, indeed, a very momentous question ever asked to a top US official in public by a citizen of Congo about the US-Congo relationship: China’s government economic engagement in the DR Congo, in the light of what the US-Congo cooperation should had been. The question was put out of context by a staffer who (apparently) did not understand the Congo’s accent of the student who spoke the French language, and provided a bad translation to Madam Secretary.

First, it is a shame for the State Department to recruit a language poorly-skilled staff to the highest US diplomatic affairs’ cabinet, regretfully. Than the media coverage of the forum was curtailed in the frenzy that always worships and longs for the Clinton buzz. Newscasters focused more on what they think Madam Secretary wanted to convey to Africans on her abilities vs. former president Clinton to bring about a new era in US-Congo relationships.

Result: The “I’m the Secretary of State, not my husband” was headlined on front pages of newspapers and 30 seconds “sound bite” played all day on every American TV network. The Daily News and the New York Post and others quickly “Xeroxed” the AP breaking news for their morning (August 11th) cover page. American listeners and viewers were unfairly fed with a sound bite played on almost every network, even though US journalists recognized the incident turns out to be a wrong translation of what the student’s question really meant. Interesting, business TV channels such as CNN-Money, CNBC and others Bloomberg News should have had interest in covering the story but all seem to have missed the ball… Or simply did not elaborate on another China’s gain over the US in the world’s business competition we have been losing at every inch of the way.

The release of the recorded-translation clearly casts a (female) voice translating the question by University of Kinshasa’s student (a young man), and it reads: (about the China and Congo’s relationships…)”What does Mr. Clinton think through the mouth of Mrs. Clinton, and what does Mutombo think about?” instead of translating: “What does Mr. President think through the mouth of Mrs. Clinton, and what does Mutombo think about?” The real argument here that one can make sense out of is to just think this: What if the incident played good for the US diplomat who happened lucky to not even dodge the question? Students from all over the world like President Obama, and students in Congo understand their aspirations in regards to the current US Administration. Any reference to Bill Clinton to reflect on China-Congo relationships won’t even cross their minds a beat, given the former president’s background on the Great Lakes conflict since the 90s.What strikes me, as I write this opinion piece here, is that the media did not extensively comment on Madam Secretary’s response, even after a clarification was made about the true meaning of the question.

Just as many Americans have not learned any consistent news on Congo’s fate in past decades. Meanwhile, China has gain significant economic interests in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan, as reported several informed-organizations. The US has been on the side lines, had timidly and sometimes just rhetorically referred to their will to “work with” these war-torn nations in order to help them recover, instead they did not effectively engage them economically.

The US government failed, to a large extent, to support them with conflict resolution during the invasion of the Eastern Congo region, the horrific mass killings in both Sudan’s Darfur region and Congo while complaining, for more than a decade, about the violence borne of sequences of civil unrests. America talked “human rights” when it comes to consequences of the war (rape and violence on civilians) but did too little when it comes to put pressure on the governments of Congo and Sudan, while China did none of these things and would never even refer to the observance of human rights when they strike a business deal. In facts, it’s not a secret to anyone that China, still a totalitarian regime, has made huge progress in economic development and diplomacy although a “red” regime. China seats on the UN Security Council without being questioned too much on plans it has to protecting and respecting the rights of its own citizens.

A call to US Media to factually and objectively report on African Affairs

A Huffington Post website writer critiqued the lack of depth in facts by US media coverage of the Congo’s conflict that required 17,000 UN peacekeepers to intervene, and yet unsuccessfully pacified. Georgianne Nienaber wrote that we (reporters) “owe Africa the same kind of attention to detail and accuracy in reporting. There is a certain sloppiness that happens in reports from Africa, and we can all do better”, she said.

A few newspapers like the NYT which report on DR Congo every other 6 weeks, sometimes with just a few short articles lost in pages 6 or 10; reporters negligently write without really attracting US scholars and citizens’ curiosity on the Congo’s crisis when, ironically, this war has been called the “worst armed conflict involving many countries since the World War II”. Radio, TV commentators and producers turn away from citizens’ calls and emails when contacted to speak out and to contribute in news analysis about the Congo during their show casts.

I personally was a guest-contributor on US-African Affairs with Voice of America (VOA) in Washington DC, and I sat down on a radio/web-TV panel that debated on the post-Congo’s 2006 presidential elections. My opinions on the topic, as always, were so pointed and my account of facts very challenging versus the scripted version they had. It’s safe to say that they did not align with the producers’ talking points on the DRC crisis, and (reason why) I never got invited again, despite my calls, emails and offers to contribute in months that followed. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and reporter Lisa Ling for the Oprah Show played a praised but risky role when reporting stories of rape, violence and genocide in the Eastern Congo during the Bush Administration.

Anderson went with President Obama to Ghana to report on the history at slave trade site, but Anderson’s CNN remained silent on Hillary Clinton’s trip to the DR Congo… No special report, not even a press correspondent was seen to be on Clinton’s plane to Congo… Why? MSNBC only played that sound bite over a “lost in translation” question, without reporting or calling for a news analysis on the question and the town hall’s highlights. Chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell invited on three shows in two days following Monday’s forum just elaborated on what may have gone wrong with the secretary of state as a person.

What a shame to reap a worst news spotlight with such unfairness in journalism, when so many human rights advocates, bloggers, Congolese and American scholars in US, activists like Kambale Musavuli of Friends of the Congo, Jean Kamba, Abraham Luakabuanga, John Pendergast or my-self; book writers, freelance photographers and even lawmakers like former GA Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney worked hard and took risks of their careers, calling for years for an exclusive spotlight on Congo since the war started?

Recent developments on the ground

The bigger Congo’s picture here is that investigative journalists in US still ignore the magnitude of the civil unrest and violence between militias, and more the illicit exploitation of minerals in Congo’s conflict zones. A recent government “launch of the operation Kimia II in the DR Congo has seen a spike in the number of sexual assaults against the women of the Kivu’s”, wrote in an editorial, Scott Morgan, web-editor of the “Confused Eagle.” One key problem, he wrote, is that the “FARDC (Government of the Democratic Congo’s Armed Forces) is not able to sustain combat operations against the Rwanda’s FDLR.

As part of the Peace Accord, the Government in Kinshasa has instructed its army (FARDC) to integrate some of the former Militia Groups into the Regular Armed Forces. The FDLR have had bases in the region since they were driven out of Rwanda, after the horrific genocide of 1994.” The FDLR (Hutu Rwandans) “have a tactical advantage of knowing the terrain” in the Kivu provinces compared to the Congolese government forces, writes Morgan.

A columnist in LA Times, Helen Winternitz, said that the Eastern region of Congo has been set by civil wars for a decade, a horrifying symptom of breakdowns through the entire government. The undisciplined Congolese army and the various militias combating the FDLR use rape as a weapon of war. As many as 200,000 women and girls have been raped, some men mutilated to the point of death in what is described as the world's worst episode in mass killing and sexual violence.

Meanwhile, on an unprecedented twist since August 1998, Rwanda and Congo’s heads of state orchestrated a quick meeting in Goma, Kivu to normalize their diplomatic relations (under US’ recommendations?) … What do the two leaders discuss when they met in Goma, days before Clinton’s trip in Congo? Not much consistent is known about. The Tutsi General Laurent Nkunda (a Rwandan-born rebel), who terrorized the Kivu’s civilian population under Congo’s “laid up” President Kabila’s watch (his accomplice), was arrested a few days before the inauguration of Barack Obama, after he benefited with an impressive military logistic support from Rwandan President Paul Kagame (his mastermind). So many unreported happenings, news stories out there…

Congolese Bloggers and Web-news critiqued some of Hillary Clinton sayings

Although Mrs. Clinton was overwhelmingly welcomed in Kinshasa, Congo’s capital city, the Agence France Press (AFP) reports that she faced “some tough questions from students.” Questions from students at a forum in Kinshasa were worth being reported in western media, and of course only a few European and Congolese local newspapers commented on.

The American public and even some high government officials don’t know the history and the recent happenings in the Democratic Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire), and if the conventional media won’t help with the matter, perhaps “citizen journalism” took over with tools like i-report, twitter, you tube, facebook, hundreds of Congolese news websites and many other independent blogs are beginning to help build networks of African news sharing in US. I’m not sure this can fight the coalition of powerful press agencies like the well-known AP, Reuters, AFP, Belga, Xinhua… But it’s been making a whole difference in shaping the public opinion.Signs of progress in social networking being noticed in Congo; residents of Kinshasa by-passed some of these traditional media who either report for either side of the story and just missed the point.

One web-twitter present at the forum (August 10th at 8:39 AM our time) wrote: “Town Hall ended a short while ago, that was pretty exciting, seeing HRC, Fox News, Secret Service and Mutombo in one room.” Another person twitted on Clinton’s address to Congolese students, reporting what she said at that very moment: “I came here to talk to you students before anyone in your government; I expect more transparency from your government” US News media would not broadcast even on a 30 seconds sound bite that: “A student told Clinton, to applause from the crowd, that underdevelopment (of DR Congo) stemmed from a long history of Western exploitation in the resource-rich nation, once notoriously the private fiefdom of Belgium's King Leopold II…”, as reported the AFP here.

Digging deep on the forum’s aftermath, one of the US top diplomat’s answers to Congolese created an outrage in many circles in Kinshasa; when Mrs. Clinton refused to “look back to the past”, saying she (the US) wants to “work with people who are seeking for a good future, not those who refer to the past.” An online blogger for hinterland wrote an open-letter back to Clinton saying: “This one sentence from your answers to the forum in Kinshasa is very saddening, and brings wordiness among the Congolese people, which is still traumatized by a 13 years-long war.

Your country, the US, wrote Roger Puati, wants to work with the Congolese people while suggesting that we live by your way of thinking: Never refer to the past… Meaning forget the humiliation we have endured for 10 years and even more for the past 50 years?” An expert on Central African Affairs and author of “East along the Equator”, Helen Winternitz writes in an Op-ed that “When Congo emerged from the vicious colonial rule of Belgium; the United States empowered and, as a Cold War tactic, supported Mobutu Sese Seko. Utilizing the dictator was considered a legitimate tool by American policymakers who did not worry about the long-term consequences. Mobutu fathered the corrupt and dysfunctional mode of governing that now plagues the country.

”Another Congolese appalled by Clinton’s remarks, Jean-Pierre Mbelu writes on a French/Flemish language website Congoforum.be: “In our faces, Mrs. Clinton asks us (Congolese) to turn the page on a past that holds more than 5 millions of lost lives ! “What about this? Secretary Clinton calls for trials on soldiers who raped in war zones without referring to their foreign chief-allies, past US administration’s officials and multinationals involved in secretly supporting or carrying out the invasion in the DR Congo to be tried as well or called on for their wrong deeds… Is that how the US will work with us?”

What if anything the Department of State should learn from this?

“Obama, who took an interest in Congo when he was in the Senate, has inherited the moral responsibility to make amends and help the Congolese build a government that actually works on their behalf”, says in an Op-Ed, Winternitz. The Senate bill S. 2125 from the 109th US Congress on the Democratic Republic of Congo happened to be the only foreign policy, Mr. Barack Obama (then US Senator) initiated with a bi-partisan support from twelve other US Democrat and Republican Senators. In the light of that 2006 congressional law signed by George Bush, the Obama administration cannot afford lose its “own” message.

Madame Secretary Clinton should be commended for meeting with students “before” meeting Congo’s officials (good move); she is to be saluted for clearly “voicing up” ( government officials including President Kabila) on the resolutions that borne from the last spring US Senate hearing on the DR Congo. A key message was to stop and prosecute the rape, used as weaponin conflict zones. This is the 111th congress senate hearing on Congo/Sudan where (as I reported earlier in Spring) California Senator Barbara Boxer (D) and the audience could not resist a heart breaking to the horrific account of scenes of rape and violence by among many, Mrs. Chouchou Namegabe, a Kivu-based Journalist and Activist.

In an open letter to Sec. Clinton, another Congolese US-based website’s owner urges, on the post Congo’s trip, the US to be practical if “work with” Congo is what they want, and get all rapists be tried in criminal courts. He proposes Clinton’s cabinet to “… send DNA technical experts to DRC to help collect DNA samples from former militias and soldiers who fought in the east of Congo and from children born out of rapes. By matching the DNA samples of children and militias in a DNA data center, wrote the web-writer, the paternity of these fatherless children will clearly be established.”

Editor Sylvester Ngoma believes that “… The criminals will then be excluded from the national army and brought to justice. Even new victims will be able to report to these data centers for DNA collection to help catch rape criminals. This approach will have several positive effects. Some soldiers will leave the national army on their own just by knowing that their DNA will be collected and kept in a data center. The parliament will need to pass a law mandating all soldiers who fought in the east of the country to comply to the "DNA as a Rape Deterrence Plan" (from Congovision)At the end of the dayHaving say all that, Secretary Hillary Clinton still needs to carefully do an unscripted facts check on Congo since the Rwanda genocide of 1994, and attentively review the history about the after 1997 invasion of the DR Congo by Rwandan and Ugandan militias (when Bill Clinton was President).

The State Department’s African Affairs division must sincerely determine what the public opinion in regards to the US responsibility in the conflict is, and then apply President Obama’s own policy. The Congo Senate Bill (as they call it) will empower Secretary Clinton to pressure on President Joseph Kabila’s governance style. Only the S2125 bill would help them to measure up the progress in security and the observance of human rights towards the people of Congo, and then she can finally masterfully avoid alienate, frustrate the Congolese people, but would preach the message of “Hope”, accompanied with an engaging economic and bi-lateral cooperation the US failed in the past 8 years.

It has to be known that above and beyond the differences of cultures, languages and the issue of proximity, Congo shares a common history with the US, citing the past “Cold War” as an illustration; Congo (ex-Zaire) has gone out of the way to contribute through the generosity of its people, the use of its territory militarily, its strategic resources, minerals and intelligence to strengthen US national security and preserve its interests not only in the Continental Africa, but here at home and around the world.

Fifty years since Congo’s independence, and considering the potential level of cooperation both countries can still develop, our commitment at Congoboston.com to write ( please read: to accurately translate) the opinion of the Congolese people from their French heritage to English, and into the American mainstream media, I strongly hope that today’s message of “Hope” to Congo will NOT be lost in translation again.

An Opinion Editorial by Franklin Katunda, in Washington DC

Franklin is a freelance web-writer; chief-editor for Congoboston.com. Barack Obama surrogate, expert in US politics and foreign Affairs, he actively worked for 2 years within the presidential campaign and is member of OFA, Organizing for America.

© August 18th 2009, Congoboston.com

Obama's Congo and Sudan Foreign Policy Still Challenged

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:36:35 EDT

We begin with an email letter from a friend=advocate for the DR Congo to web-editor Franklin Katunda:

Hi Franklin,

I saw that you are advocating for the Congo and enjoyed reading what you wrote. I lived in Goma, DRC, and worked with HEAL Africa (www.healafrica.org) for two years. It is an organization started by a Congolese orthopedic surgeon and has over 200 Congolese on staff. There are four of us here in the States now working for HEAL Africa and getting the word out about what our Congolese colleagues are doing amidst war. I also saw that you mentioned Friends of the Congo and they are one of our partners here in the States. I will actually be moderating a panel at their event this Sunday after the performance of the play "Ruined" in NYC. You can find more info here:http://www.friendsofthecong...

Anyways, just wanted to make the connection. Hope that you are doing well and continuing to spread the word about the hope and potential in the Congo.

Take Care,

Harper

harper@healafrica.org

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Response from Franklin

Thank you so much Harper for what you are doing in the DR Congo, helping with the Congolese surgeons.

I will be publishing more and will share it with Organizing for America" members of my group. President Obama said during the campaign: " We are the change we have been waiting for", and I strongly believe it is as we move forward with the foreign policy agenda of our country towards Africa in general and the DR Congo in particular. The US-Africa foreign policy was too long tainted while dealing with the conflicts in Sudan and the DR Congo. We were not able to help resolve these conflicts for too long.

President Bush supported for the past 4 years term, a Rwandan president whose troops invaded a sovereign country (the Democratic Republic of Congo). Kagame spoke at a DC press conference, called by "Voice of America" government radio that " it was necessary" for Rwanda (his troops) to go into (invade) the Congo", because he believed his own people, "Hutu tribe members" who found refuge in the eastern province of Kivu (DR Congo). According to him, the hutu were preparing attacks in Rwandan territory (which never happened).

Since the invasion of the DR Congo, Rwanda curiousely produces and sells minerals such the 3 T's and other gold, diamonds they don't produce(officially). Most of their shipments started their journey from the Congo's cities (where the war takes place) in route these convoys head to Kigali International Airport, Rwanda where they are cargoed overseas to Asia, Europe and US corporations. Supplies from the Congo's war zones help manufacturers make electronics components, jewelry and weapons...

Kagame = Saddam Hussein as far as being a terrorist; he is also a war criminal and a sponsor of terrorism in DR Congo. The only difference in between the two is that the later invaded Kuwait, was punished by the US, and removed by force. The first one has been a friend of the Bush administration. He is still in power even after he invaded the DR Congo, he always had a free pass from the US, even after a UN account established his troops raped and killed many and caused the mass killings of thousands of inoncent civilians in Congo's cities.

Madam Secretary Clinton and President Obama should be held accountable in the way they will enforce the senate-enacted policy in regard to the DR Congo; i'm talking about the S-2125 Senate Bill on Security, Devevelopment and Governance in DR Congo; Activists have to push a pressure and checks, as far as to see if they (the administration) will be diligently helping to stop this humanitarian disaster, the violation of human rights and human dignity.

We, supporters of the campaign that elected President Obama have a solemn obligation to establish a "check-and-balance" on the current administration and Congress in order to change our foreign policy towards Congo and Sudan. I said it before: the appointment of Johnnie Carson at the State department's african affairs, the appointment of a new US ambassador to China, was, to my sense a key to enleash a new strategy in dealing with instability in these two countries in which China has strenghten diplomatic and economic relationships. Sudan welcomed chinese businesses at an increasing level, while the chinese entrepreneurs are road and infrastructure builders in the DR Congo. Where is the United States "economically" and "strategically" in these countries?

How would the Obama administration through its State Department engage China in regards to Sudan and Congo? How would Clinton deal with strong-tied US corporations that are playing the same role as China in these countries economies? What is the fine line between opening business deals with governments of Sudan and Congo that are violating human rights?

The Sudan's region of darfur and the Eastern Congo's conflicts have been out there for too long. It's time to end them by obtaining a firm commitment from China to play a crucial role to substantiate our cooperation and aid to sound governance, and observance of human rights.... America needs to turn the page on its past mistakes dealing with Africa. Secretary Clinton should really take advantage of her trip to Africa and really come back with a clear differentiation between the Continent as a whole and its Respective Nations (52 countries) , its economic realities, our interests within each one of them, and the geopolitics and various cultures Africa has. Those who committed crimes should not be in power, they should be prosecuted in court, and the Obama administration should acknowledge the ICC (International Court) for its role in doing just that in Africa.

We are watching this 11 days trip to 7 African countries: (KENYA, SOUTH AFRICA, ANGOLA, DR CONGO, NIGERIA, LIBERIA AND CAPE VERDE)....Not a mention about RWANDA and SUDAN amazingly...but happily Cape Verde long time ignored, Cape Cerde has been on the growth's path and has observed sound democracy... This small African island-country with powerful lobbying immigrant networks in most American cities. Nigeria and Angola's economies deserve support from the US and conflicts in Kenya and DR Congo should appaul the world and South Africa should be teamed up with to help prevent HIV/AIDS and apply some better application models in prevention in other African nations as well.

I'm Franklin Katunda, an Obama surrogate and I approve this message.

Check my latest news article on the DR Congo news at www.congoboston.com

Can Obama make a difference in Africa?

Franklin Katunda — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:33:24 EDT

"Change in US-AFRICA relationship"?

Comments by Franklin Katunda, group's administrator

Would the US become more engaged in the African Continent in the Obama era? Too long western corporates (including many US firms and merecenaries) have been part of networks of sponsors for weapons dealings with African military leaders, whom for most are despot, dictators. The illicit exploitation of mines and other precious gems in the old continent have caused wars, coup d'Etats and genocides. Most civil wars and genocides happened by the hands of armed leaders with connections with financiers and merceneries from US, Europe and even communist nations like Iran, Lybia, China, Russia and Korea.

The African continent became since the 60s a place when our national security was at risk with the initial East-West Cold War to end up with post democratization of most african regimes in the 80s to become a terrain of easy money for these outlaws. The 1990 to 2000s horrific happenings in Africa (Sudan, Congo Democratic, Rwanda, Nigeria and others Somalia, Kenya) and the motives behind their actors could fragilize our national security, if political instability, civil unrest, economic crisis and poor governance can still prevail.

Too long the foreign policy of the United States towards Africa has been timid, our diplomacy mode has been even accomplice, sold out to the dictat of the Europeans (former colonists of all African nations to the exception of Liberia). The French, the British, Portuguese and the Belgians have no power but an historical advantage over the US in Africa; the European Union is running the show in the old continent, and more it leads the US in every area of interest: economy, geopolitics, education, cultural identity and more the choice of leaders to become heads of states. It is time the United States of America become the ally, once of african countries that make progress in the observance of human rights, good governance and economic growth.

Here is the question: Now that Africa has been neglected too long ... Can Obama make the difference in Africa? How would he proceed when nominating Amb Carson, a longtime Intelligence officer and a 37 years diplomat in a continent that shifted from being a cold war terrain in the 60s to become "presumably" a barn to a few Al qaeda elements, to numerous illegal "western" predators and "communists" outlaws?

What do you think Amb. Carson could bring to the process to improving a positive and active presence of the United States in Africa; to the benefit of both the welfare of the African people and our country's national security?

Please read, and leave your comments at the bottom.

****

JOHNNIE CARSON NAMED AFRICAN AFFAIRS UNDERSECRETARY AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT

President Barack Obama today announced his intent to nominate Ambassador Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, State Department.

Ambassador Johnnie Carson is currently the National Intelligence Officer for Africa on the National Intelligence Council. He joined the NIC in September 2006 after a 37-year career in the Foreign Service. Prior to this appointment, Carson served as the Senior Vice President of the National Defense University in Washington D.C. (2003-2006).

Carson's Foreign Service career includes ambassadorships to Kenya (1999-2003), Zimbabwe (1995-1997), and Uganda (1991-1994); and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of African Affairs (1997-1999). Earlier in his career he had assignments in Portugal, Botswana, Mozambique, and Nigeria. He has also served as desk officer in the Africa section at State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research; Staff Officer for the Secretary of State (1978-1979), and Staff Director for the Africa Subcommittee of the US House of Representatives (1979-1982).

Before joining the Foreign Service, Ambassador Carson was a Peace Corps volunteer in Tanzania. He has a Bachelor of Arts in History and Political Science from Drake University and a Master of Arts in International Relations from the School of Oriental and Africa Studies at the University of London.

Ambassador Carson is the recipient of several Superior Honor Awards from the Department of State and a Meritorious Service Award from Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. The Centers for Disease Control presented Ambassador Carson its highest award, "Champion of Prevention Award," for his leadership in directing the US Government's HIV/AIDS prevention efforts in Kenya.

Mary Kargbo Removed from the Group Africans & Americans for Obama

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:01 EDT

Dear Members of “Africans and Americans for Obama” group,

Before hand, I would like to follow up on my yesterday’s email to tell you how sorry I am about the incident involving a “member” called “MARY KARGBO, ESQ” also known on the campaign’s website as “MARY from OKLAHOMA CITY, OK”.

This has been a hurt to most of you as this member incited a series back and forth emails, fueled a spread of hateful messages using very demining callings in a debate that violated the spirit, the vision and the goals of our group. More, she has disturbed more than one member by sending spams to the entire list-serv at a proportion of about 3 to 5 emails a day.

I understood, after reading the responses to my email when I suggested Mary to “remove her-self” from the group that Mary Kargbo, Esq (from the so called “Kargbo Law Office”—see the email’s title) has one mission in her mind: Distract and discourage Obama group’s members from staying involved in the work we have now and ahead of us, now that Barack Obama has been sworn in President.

Don’t ask me how a member (who according to the group’s records has joined on February 22nd 2007, under an email: KARGBOLAWOFFICE@GMAIL.COM became as trivial figure as she has been now, only when we just begun the work we pledged to support and toil for in past 2 years. All I can say is that she (if ever it is a “she”) has aligned herself as someone who preaches hate, intolerance and defamations while she is a Christian who claims her faith without showing the values that come with the epithet, a believer who makes stories about President Obama, hoping that sticks in our minds another story that characterizes President Obama as a Chicagoan that would try to perpetuate a “fairy tale”.

Well, after the flow of more responses and emails from Mary Kargbo Esq, today ( March 19th, 09) still inciting hate and defamation against the President and his agenda; after I have received many listserv and private email messages from members (among whom many asked to be removed if ever Mary was called on to just leave “freely”; given my duties as the Group’s administrator of the group “Africans and Americans For Obama”; considering the sensitivity of the moment when the American people hope that “We the People” – the organizers MUST help to bring and to keep a focus on bringing “real” debates to the table of discussions on issues like Healthcare, Education and Dependence on Foreign Oils -- I have decided 4 following elements and have acted upon immediately:

1. I have reported “Mary from Oklahoma City, OK” to the BarackObamaDotCom as an intruder with the purpose to disturb and to derail the vision and the work done by the group.

2. I have removed (March 19th 2009, at 7:30pm EST) from the group, “Mary Kargbo, Esq. of Oklahoma City”, OK from the group without any further delay.

3. I have instructed an investigation to detect the email used in connection with the mailing to prevent more incidents, and results are to come.

4. I call upon all remaining members to send me a direct email, if ever we do suspect another “Mary” has disguised her/him-self as another “deceitful” member within the group.

Dear Members,

Again, I do apologize to all those who were annoyed, appalled and offended by the comments and actions from this member (who is no longer one, as of now).

I ask you to reconsider, if ever you had decided to eminently unsubscribe from the group. The time is neither to quit nor to be distracted from meeting head on the challenges we face as a country; while we are working on bringing the process of change in action in Washington DC, the Republicans and the “racists” associated to the same right-wing talking points have constituted a bloc against the President’s agenda. They are being promoted by the masterminds of the “old ways” of doing business across both sides of the Capitol Hill political divide and have decided more than ever to exclude the American people becoming once again actors in public affairs.

They hope AIG’s bonuses be honored without challenge, without the American expressing their outrage; they hope they turn our online groups and the entire website into an inadequate instrument, in order to weaken the job we are doing to “Organize for America”.

Well, we know better than that. I’m sure all of you agree that it will take us more efforts to accomplish the will of the American people expressed in every recent election our country has held from 2006-2009 today than when we all worked hard to elect an “instrument” that would bring change in America: Barack Obama.

I’m glad that several groups are still active and involved: that why several SEIU members within continue to rally in Washington and lobby the DC’s insiders to push for the Employee Free Choice Act; many of them have protested the AIG and Bank of America’s embarrassments in Boston, today. This website still makes it possible to organize in precincts around debates such as the Healthcare forums and it is a great tool that helps inform members about the White House’s execution of the campaign’s agenda.

We would never lose sight of it, that my prayer, we will always remember what Barack Obama said about bringing change to Washington DC. I am happy we don’t have a “dictator” like Mary and those alike suggested but he is the man who asked us to believe in our abilities to bring change, not just in his abilities as candidate (today President).

“… The way to change will be long and it won’t be easy! ”-- he warned before the DNC convention, to finally promise on the Victory night that: “…We, as a people, we will get there!” Let no “Republicans-with-no-agenda” distract us from remaking America, starting in our backyard, our launch pads, in our group’s blogs

I’m Franklin Katunda, an Obama Surrogate, and I approve this message!!!

STAY PLUGGED IN FOR "CHANGE": Where We Go from Here

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:00:58 EST

STAY TUNED AND PLUGGED INTO THE CHANGE PROCESS IN AMERICA

1. To learn more about the Inauguration events: http://www.pic2009.org/

2. About the Transition and How You Can continue being involved: www.change.gov

3. About the ongoing "My Barack Obama's Network" at: www.mybarackobama.com

INAUGURAL D.C . EVENTS from 17-20 january 2009

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:44:35 EST

Young and Powerful for Obama Presents a Collection of Inaugural Events that Mimic the Obama/Biden Message of:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

***VISION***

Young & Powerful Group Launch Event
More Info/Purchase Tickets: www.yp4obama.com/launch

Saturday, January 17, 2009
Time: 7:00pm-11:00pm
Holiday Inn Capitol - Columbia Ballroom
550 C St. SW
Washington, DC 20024
www.hicapitoldc.com
**1 block from L'Enfant Plaza Metro - Maryland and 6th St. Exit (green, yellow, blue, & orange lines)

Advanced Ticket Sale Price: $50
Includes: Heavy Hors D’oeuvres, Cash bar
Hosted by Jeanie Jones of WKYS
Music by DJ Premonition

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

***HOPE***

Young & Powerful MLK Presidential Brunch
in conjunction w/ IMPACT
More Info/Purchase Tickets: www.yp4obama.com/brunch

Sunday, January 18, 2009
Time: 11:00am - 2:00pm
City Club
1300 I Street, NW
Washington, DC www.clubcorp.com

**One block from McPherson Square Metro (blue and orange line)

A message of Hope from Dr. Michael Eric Dyson
Keynote Speaker: Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr.
Hosted by: Radio One's Sheila Stewart

Advanced Ticket Sale Price: $44.00 *For our 44th President
Includes: Full Service Brunch & Beverages

Host Organizations:
NAACP - DC Chapter, The Greater Baltimore Leadership Association Young Professionals, Thursday Network , Northern Virginia Urban League Young Professionals Network, Howard University - Student Bar Association

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

***CHANGE***

Young & Powerful Political Forum & Roundtable Discussion
in conjunction w/ IMPACT
More Info/Purchase Tickets: www.yp4obama.com/forum

Monday, January 19, 2009
Time: 1:00pm
Howard University - Blackburn Center
Washington, DC
**Five minute walk from Howard University Metro (green line)
Hosted by: IMPACT and The Political Roundtable
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

***CHANGE***

Young & Powerful Black Tie Gala & Awards Ceremony
in conjunction w/ IMPACT
More Info/Purchase Tickets: www.yp4obama.com/gala

Monday, January 19, 2009
Time: 8:00pm
L'Enfant Plaza Hotel
480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20024
www.lenfantplazahotel.com

**1200 Underground Parking Places and Underground Metro that Opens in Hotel (green, yellow, blue, & orange lines)

Surprise Celebrity Performance!
Hosted by: EZ Street of 93.9 WKYS
Music by: DJ Premonition
"Socialize with us as we dine, dance and toast President Obama's victory.
Have Fun, Stay Warm, and Celebrate the Obama Presidency"
Advanced Ticket Sale Price: $125.00
Includes: Open Bar from 9pm - 11pm, Heavy Hors D'oeuvres, and Live Band

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

*** The Civil Rights Presidential Inaugural Gala will be taking place on January 20th at 480 L'Enfant Plaza in Washington, DC.

To contact and know how to attend please see enclosed here, the site for more information to reach the organizers:

http://www.thedreamcometrue...

***REDEMPTION***

Young & Powerful Inaugural Celebration
A Semi-Formal Affair in conjunction w/ IMPACT
More Info/Purchase Tickets: www.yp4obama.com/semiformal

Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Time: 8:00pm
Ireland's Four Fields
3412 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20008

**1 block from Cleveland Park Metro(red line)

Hosted by: Olivia Fox of Majic 102.3
Music by: DJ Premonition
"Celebrate this historical day with other Obama enthusiasts
and network with Young and Powerful members as we
commemorate a day to remember for a lifetime."

Advanced Ticket Sale Price: $100.00
Includes: Complimentary Champagne Toast, Dinner Buffet,
and special Young & Powerful token of appreciation for all guest!

For more information about our events
please contact. yp4obama@gmail.com
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Be Seen...Be Heard...Be Powerful
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Young and Powerful for Obama:
http://www.yp4obama.com/

About the Inauguration on January 20th 2009

Franklin Katunda — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:12 EST

Dear Friends,

The following website has been set to iform you on inauguration day events, volunteer and job opportunities, etc. Please visit it:

http://www.pic2009.org

Thanks for continuing to read me on your in-box after our historical win on November 4th 2008. Hopefully some of you would confirm me you will be coming to DC. I live in the city currently and I am more likely to be there !!!!

Best Regards,

God Bless,

Franklin Katunda. An Obama Surrogate

1,053,791 Calls Made to Voters on Nov 4th

Franklin Katunda — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:45:08 EST

GOTV Phone Banking Experience on Nov 4th:

Dear Friends,

(At 9:22 pm) -- We just broke one million calls for the day, once again showing the power of this movement, but polls are still open in critical battleground states like Montana and Nevada and the night is still young. Supporters around the country keep calling to ensure voters know where to go to vote. The calls you make in the next hour could make the difference in the outcome of these states.

We are closing in on our goal for 1.2 million calls for Election Day and these are the calls that will bring us to victory. Make calls to Montana and Nevada now.

(Later on ... before the anouncement)

We're still awaiting the final results tonight (As of Nov 4th 2008 later at night), but one thing is clear -- this grassroots movement can never be underestimated.

Thank you to everyone who helped us make an astounding 1,053,791 calls today!

I know it wasn't easy and many of you kept calling long after you were tired and your voice had grown hoarse, but your calls to get our supporters out the polls helped tip the scales in key battleground states like Pennsylvania and Ohio.

We've shut down our calling campaigns for the night, incredibly proud of the record amount of calls made today. You gave it your all and we couldn't have asked for more.

Thank you again for everything you've done. You've been with Barack Obama every step of this journey. This is your night.

Obama For America

+++

PS. I joined the GOTV phonebanking organized by the Obama campaign along with the Local Union UNITE HERE! at 33 Harrisson Ave, Chinatown (downtown Boston). We made calls to Virginia towns of Yorktown, Newport News, Poquoson, Hampton, Petersburg and Kilmarnorck and to New Hampshire towns of Exeter and Hudson from 9am to 4pm

Results: Obama won both Virginia (52% to 47) and New Hampshire (55% to 44)

OBAMA-BIDEN 08'

I am African-American volunteering GOTV in Chinatown

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:56:33 EST

By Franklin Katunda 36 seconds ago (Updated 36 seconds ago in the website's main page)

Hello Obama Supporters,

Thank you for reading my thoughts this morning on the "D DAY Nov. 4th 2008"

-- I'm glad I made it from Virginia where I work to Boston my home place yesterday, Monday. I escaped ably the traffic caused by the Manassas, VA Obama's Last Rally when driving to DC Reagan Airport... I got on the Anerican Airlines RJet plane at 7:30 flight and by 8 pm I was in Boston Logan.

This morning (fired up), I am getting ready to go vote two blocks away from my sister's place in my little town of Revere, Massachusetts than I will ride the metro to downtown Boston where the Obama Team has assigned me and Brad, a friend of mine to work on GOTV in "ChinaTown"...

Chinatown? First time campaigning in such neighborhood doing field organizing; I have one day to learn "Hands-on" about it and I;ll surely do it with all the excitement it brings!

My friend, Brad (young white fellow) is preparing to travel to China next year for a temporary work. You can read how happy he is to experience first-hand the feeling of working in a community other your own.

For me, nothing particular! All I know is that I am a young African-American Community Organizer and I am campaigning for Change in Chinatown for the first time on November 4th. That's what makes it exciting to be in the Obama Team: "A campaign by ordinary folks like you and me working for change on the behalf the American people"

Here is the picture: A Black young man in his thirties, wearing an Obama styled-sweater and PIN written in Hebrew (Israel) that reads Barack Obama 08' campaigning in Chinatown

-- About the pin: A campaign person gave it to me last weekend in Boston...She said they got them from Florida where a "Get-Out-The-Vote" in the Jewish community has been successful. Well, for my first time, I am canvassing in Chinatown, downtown Boston on an important election day.

Considering I worked for "Obama for America" in Goffstown NH, Arlington TX, Washington DC, Jamaica Plain MA, and Charlotte NC... The question is - How more surreal this campaign can be... Hein?

I hope you are blessed by this story. Lets get out and win this election; lets organize our neighborhoods and change the world!

I am Franklin, an Obama Surrogate and I approve this message!

US LEADERSHIP IN AFRICA: CHANGE WE NEED !

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:35:28 EDT

Dear Members of "AFRICANS and AMERICANS FOR OBAMA" online group,

Fellow Americans, Congolese and Friends of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Zaire),

I'm Franklin Katunda, community leader and organizer. Since 2001 I'm been president and editor of the Congoboston Network --that helps thousands of African immigrants to social networking online and through events. I learned about Senator Barack Obama after the 2004 DNC Convention, have learned about his judgement and character during his US Senate during the War in Iraq. I endorsed Barack Obama for US Senate Re-election in December of 2006 after he adressed my "Class of 2006" at the Universirty of Massachusetts-Boston. I did not know he was going to run for the higher office, but I have watched his US senate's moves to pass bills working with both sides of the aisles and ... I discovered the Man's mind.

I knew Obama is the "Man with the Plan", not a follower! Now, soon as he announced his candidacy in February of 2007, It was easy for me to back someone that I as a role model, a leader, a charismatic visionary; young and refreshing politician like I would like to be. I knew which candidate, against all odds of backing a least experienced candidate, to choose from Clinton, Biden, Dodd, Edwards bids, and I decided to believe and to back Barack Obama (D. Illinois) in the 2007 pre-primaries.

Currently I am a Non-paid Field Organizer, and an Online Group Coordinator; I am working on an ambitious current project to rally a voter's registration that supports and raises awarness in politics from newly African Naturalized US-Citizens. I work in campaigning for and in helping to elect Barack Obama as President of the United States of America. This year has been busy for us since the launch of the campaign in February of 2007, so we put our Congoboston's activities on hold to make sure the Illinois Senator is elected "President of the United States of America", first.

Why Barack Obama? Well, it is not because he is running for office and has a better chance at winning, but because the United States of America is seen and wanted as a strong ally by African countries, and particularly to the Congo. (Second), because among all US Senators from the 109th US Congress, Democrat Senator, Barack Obama is the only one who dared to introduce a bill that was passed and signed into law to require the Bush Administration to eefectively act on protecting the new Congolese Nation's choice of governance.

After a five years period of civil war and a coslty, unprepared and yet rigged election in 2006 in Congo, the US Senate and US House's bill was needed in DC to ensuring the welfare of not less than 40 millions of desperate Congolese, entrapped in a series of civil wars and social misery, as a result of a four decades reign of Mobutu. This is a vast and war-torn country that continues to provide to US and European Corporations tons of minerals such as the Coltan, the Uranium, the Cupper, Diamonds, and Gold. The Congo produces also a dozen of more unheard of minerals (exploited even during the recent killings that resulted in the loss of more than 5 million souls. [Read about the bill here] http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-2125

In December 2006 when the bill was introduced, passed and signed into law, Senator Barack Obama, works in a bi-partisan way to make sure this bill also called the " S.2125" : Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006, could be used by both the Executive Branch of the US government and Congress as a test piece to measure how the Bush foreign affairs' cabinet would handle this country's fate. The bill tells where the US stands in its diplomatical efforts to help to prosperity and peace in Congo. Response: The US government has done almost nothing since 2006 to ensure the bill was acted upon. The War (another insurrection) has started again in the eastern Congo, President Kabila of Congo has violated human rights on numerous occasions; his operatives (army, security agencies and presidential guards) continue to persecute and/ or to murder opposition leaders; Congolese protests are being shut out, when manifestants are being killed at every occasion without our embassy getting involved in checking facts; More than ever, I strongly believe that the future of this vast country in the heart of Africa is on the 2008 US presidential ballot.

Facts About US- DR Congo Foreign Affairs

The Bush GOP Cabinet had all the diplomatical tools to run a better foreign policy in regards to the DRC, [ ...and we had not need to sit with "hostile" leaders in order to save these innocent lives], but acted timidly, according to most US and Congo's politicians, newsmedia makers and well-informed human rights and citizen's networks in the DRC and here in US. How do we know it? Check facts on the ground: The Democratic Republic of Congo has plunged once again (September 2008) into another civil unrest in the eastern region where thousands of citizens are being bodily-mutilated with machettes and displaced by dissident troops of the war lord and domestic terrosist; Sir Nkunda Batware.

This man is well-known for his fame in killings and terrorism on civilians by the US State Department's African Affairs Office in Washington DC; His prouesses are well-acknowledged by the UN's Mission and its "Bush Friend" Mission's coordinator -- Mr William Swing. Yet Kunda Batware is being ignored by our embassy officials while he should be arrested as he is the most dangerous war criminal to be "deported" to the the Hague's Court. This former rebel and Kagame's army dissident is backed by current authorities of Rwanda (Congo eastern-border neighboring country). Amazingly, Sir Batware has been a close friend and a former political ally to the current Congo's president Joseph Kabila. [Bush supports Kabila who made it to the White House for official visits more than twice in less than four years of Bush re-elect term in the Oval Office.] Both Congolese President Kabila and Rwanda's president Kagame (another beloved-Bush ally in North Eastern Africa's region) have not done enough to crack down on dissident Nkunda Batware's operatives in the Kivu Eastern Region of the Congo; a pre-condition in restoring peace and democracy in Congo, and to ensure welfare of citizens in the region.

How long are we going to count our failed US diplomacy deeds, while a clear foreign policy was pushed by a known US senator on a bi-partisan way? Why do we have to continue another four years-period of uncertainty in the Congo if the United States has a chance to elect democrat candidate to wipe the republican failure? When issues of lack of consistency and involvment in our relationships with African countries are clearly established in the current GOP agenda -- the Congo has been flagged as a threat to national security and our strategic position in Africa. Congo is a strong ally to the US since the 60s when the country became politically independent from the Belgian Kingdom.

The DR Congo had aligned itself as one of the most pro-American philophical "stronghold" in Central Africa for three decades while the country has been surrounded by socialist colors; (pro-former USSR, pro-China, pro-North Korea and even ... because of its African roots, pro-Cuba) .... The regime of Kinshasa has resisted ideals and ties to African military regimes in countries like its neighbors: the people's republic of Congo-Brazzaville, the people's republic of Angola and some left progressist leaders such as the Zambian president Kaunda (in South) or the mighty President Machel of Mocambique; far the Congo secured America's presence in southern Sudan in efforts to stop the Khartum socialist agenda, their push in Ethiopia, Guinea and so forth etc...

The Congo ( known as Zaire) has been a reliable US "pied-a-terre", serving as a US military runway (the Kamina military base) to face and to deter both the rise of a communist ideology during the 30 years long civil in the war-torn country of Angola (South-Western border) and to help the US diplomacy to reign in isolating and rallying other African countries in the region to help end the threat to human rights, segregation and racism in the South Africa's Racist White-Supremacist regime of Peter Botha.

Minerals and components used in most US weaponry and the world's telecommunication devices are put together for decades with resources extracted from the Congo's soil. Congo has offered a best terrain to most US Presidents like Jimmy Carter (D), Ronald Reagan (R), Bush Sr (R) and Bill Clinton (D) to execute very complicated but vital national security decisions in regard to the stabiltity of Africa, by establising our intelligence in the region, a competitive market and intelligence strategy that helped the US to compete with Europe and Asia. The sin about our relationship with Africa, and for this case the DR Congo, is that we often benefited from all of the above for a less sustainable cooperation tools of diplomacy in regard to how African leaders offer a better governance, a sound fiscality, and the observance of citizens' human rights.

No doubt the DR Congo should remain a strong US ally in the Central African region where the French and the Belgians did nothing to disengage the "former" Soviets-aligned "Eastern-European Regimes" to establish their strong holds and networks in Africa. Now How in the world, with today's rise of another Russia's "impulse" with Georgia and its attempts to raise fears of an imminent "cold war", are we going to afford another war-torn Congo in the midle of Africa?

Distabilized - the Congo still produces tons of extractions of its massive "Uranium", very essential to make nuclear weaponry. That we cannot afford... remaining silent in America after it has been established that many Al-Qaeda and other terrorist operatives have been seeking to exploit and engage in illicit trade of these highly dangerous materials that can provide them with real weapons of mass destruction. The world knows it, President Bush does and Congress (with what I call Obama bill) warns it too!

Breaking the Silence (0n the behalf of Congo)

Many NGOs and associations around the world are observing a "Seven-Days" or the "Congo's Week". It is an Awarness Campaign with a theme: BREAKING THE SILENCE on the behalf of the DR Congo across the US and around the world. They have gotten the attention of several media cells in Western countries: France, Belgium, US, Australia etc to learn and advocate for the Congo, at least by talking about theese atrocities that took place when elections are taking place in US. One of them, I currently hold a membership, is the "Friends of The Congo" - FOTC [please visit their website] : www.FriendsoftheCongo.org

I cannot tell you enough how important and timely right it has been for US citizens who long for justice, equality and peace and the world; for those US-born Congolese, Americans and Friends of the Congo to rein in with their vote and support only "15 days" left before the 2008 elections to pass on this message. With this November 4th's Countdown to US elections, let all remember that the 109th Congress in its Democratic Majority with the help of 12 senators: 4 prominent Republicans and 8 Democrats had joined to co-sponsor a bill initiated by Senator B. Obama (D, Illinois). This 2006 bill had unanimousely (with few amendments and fewer objections) passed, and was signed into law to ensure better foreign policy , security, development, better governance in the Congo, and yet "nothing" consistent [ in other words "just a little"] has been done to follow through.

So, I am inviting those who are willing to visit the webpage that features that ONE-week (Sunday, October 19th through Saturday 25th 2008) event at this link: http://www.friendsofthecongo.org/time_critique.php for your own knowledge, to participate or donate if you cannot attend. Students, Capitol Hill's news professionals, Graduates-Interns, Human Rights Organizers...This is a great moment to raise awarness of the American public! Overhaul, lets remember that the 2008 US presidential elections is an answer to the failures the US developped in Africa.

One among our failed approaches in diplomacy with AFRICA

The GOP's last eight years continues to prophecy without actions for the US to rely on the Department of State's reports and on our European Allies' out-of-touch lines of diplomacy towards Africa; our current foreign service envoys are still using those heavily-biased and politically-partisan lines of policies that are ( ... as old as Pres. Nixon's talking points on African Affairs; demoded in their essence like the pre-Berlin Reagan's views on our relationships with Africa; our policies have been much of the former French president Mitterand's philophy; he forecasted a "pro-but-fake" democratic way of governance in Africa) -- And no wonder we cannot be relevant in solving most crisis in Africa where the United States have common strategic and national security interests as the Europeans, but where we still lagging in being equally involved economically like the Europeans are, and even the Chinese, the Russians and South-Koreans have been.

The US cannot afford being less politically and diplomatically involved in Africa in 2008, and expect our relationships to be economically sound in trades and to earn respect from the African People. News stories and real facts on the ground show that the Russians, the Chinese, and even South-Africans are developing sound trade deals and back-door deals with or without the Congo's approval in its soil. All this is happening far ahead of Washington's less aggressive approach in its African Affairs agenda. We are talking about the Congo in a vast continent, the one Historian Frantz Fanon said: (Africa) "...It has the map-shape of a gun with its trigger located in the Congo"

[ Please check the Africa's map and the Congo's location on in to better understand the metaphore].

The DR Congo is located at the (trigger)- the heart of the African Continent (in Yellow)

He was right because like I said before, the strategic plan to position in the region comes a sustained stability, peace and democracy in the Congo. This is an African country where, if there is not a strong leadership in Washington DC, our national security interests in the region will be in a permanent danger for real. Congo's strategic location on the Africa's regional map is economically a better market to engage and invest in, and with respect to the US intelligence and our military overahaul strategies in the region, the next president of the USA should do better than "all" his predecessors.

Change We Need in our relations with AFRICA

Where have we been all this time? Good question. I will tell you what? We always have developped that mentality that to deal with Africans, we ought to be careful on who (public officials) we send out to carry the message in Africa; we are always careful in choosing our "envoys", we emphasize on their ethnic and religious backgrounds; we base our selection of diplomats or State departments Officers on what is their knowledge of the region as we anticipate "wrongly" that our African counterparts (presidents, royalties or their ministers) would line up with how Europeans lines of diplomacy would dictate our stance, given the history of Africa colonists in the 1960s. For e.g. countries like Portugal, Spain, England, France, and even smaller numbers of Germans and Italian adventureers in Africa have marked their foot-prints, cultural landmarks and have shaped political philosophies in Africa.

In 2008, just like in other continents where colonists have no longer dictate the way business should be conducted, countries and territories like Hong-Kong, Macao, Taiwan, Brasil, India and many other lands where colonists left their foot prints, citizens and their government decided to "admit" they are ready to be on their own, and to embrace new ideas, new horizons, new opportinities -- to launch new markets of the 21th century. What Can the US do at this point? It is the role of the USA, I believe, to engage a new quality diplomatic approach that restores confidence from the African People's stand point. The US have to guarantee two aspects with a new and successful diplomacy tactic in its relationship with Africa: Engaging in Economic and Strategic Security Initiatives in the Continent and to Restoring democracy and a regulated and fiscally-sustained system of governance.

The African Affairs Office at the Department of State ( during the next Obama Administration) should actively work in exploring ways to offer "sticks and carrots" to hold African leaders "accountable" to respect of their signed-and-agreed upon treaties, their local politics dealings and issue promises, their binding bi-lateral agreements with the United States. We should compete with other countries like China, South-Korea or Argentina where African leaders are NOT being asked much to qualify in dealings. Economically speaking , it is about securing America, in one hand, our trades and investments' operatives (guarantying peace and stability) for "highly" profitable African markets. On the other hand, the US should ensure civil liberties are respected, they should reward fiscally-sound governance and encourage the enactment of national laws that promote the eradication of the culture of corruption as a way to monitor the improvement, to re-enforce the laws and ensure the respect of rule of law overahaul, as the 2006 Congo's "Obama Bill" outlined.

Besides many other failures to enforcing our treaties and bi-lateral accords in the African Affairs office at the Department of State, there are these US Governemt's weak actions that did not do much US initiative to Africans in terms of reenforcing the presence with the peace corps, humanitarian organizations and educational and relief organizations on the ground to work with local networks that canvass their communities.

The US should engage pre-emptively the health and human services approach in Africa in order to prevent diseases, pandemies and better nutrition for the population. To denounce and to stop adverse trends in ways of governance that leed to recent African Nation's cases of Genocide, such as Darfour (In Sudan) , Rwanda and the Eastern-Congo. Our relationships with African Leaders have to go beyond just helping them to stay capable militarly but to offer them logistic assistance when it comes to dealing with conflict resolution of hot national topics.

Our embassies in Africa should double efforts like do their couterparts in middle-eastern regions with bi-cultural and bi-lingual envoys to deal with and to clearly decongest the national political apparatus in every country where foreign service officers are assigned to. We need to learn how culture, history and tribal aspirations can shape and benefit US present and future relationships; they have to be active, as intelligence becomes available, to not only report, but to repudiate violations of human rights and to work in these countries' educational settings. Our cooperation in education should promote an agenda that eradicate sentiments of hate and philosopies that oppose the US...

The US should assist and reward only those countries that offer a progress report with fiscally-sound ways of governance; the observance of democracy and human rights. They haven't been doing so in the last decades, because we buy into fallacious French "Mitterand" ideas that because there: "... was election in a given African country, means that country's regime is "democratic".

It's Time to Turn the Page !

The 2008 elections is a time to change course in our foreign policy and to recognize our moral and historical responsibility in regards to Africa; It is an opportunity to raise awarness to the facts that the US has crucial need of a solid "diplomatic machine", made of a new generation of effective "foreign service" officials, effective appointed-government officials, foreign affairs officers in DC and in our consulates. Paramount, the US should show a stronger leadership in the White House that will level with a better diplomacy and will apply a "Peace-and-Democracy" philosophy versus the current "Our interest-Only" approach in Africa.

Like never before there is a need of a US President and an Administration in DC that hold a pro-democracy and human rights-compliant agenda in Africa. Senator Barack Obama (author of S. 2521) has the record to prove it, maybe did not articulate much about it, but worse John McCain never been vocal (not even once) for such an agenda in Africa. He won't do it, won't promise he would look into it. We can't even hold him accountable in doing some thing about it because I doesn't KNOW much about !

Barack Obama is the only alternative to save millions of lives who die in civil conflicts, of diseases and pandemies, of lack of economic development, because of political persecutions or ethnic cleansing! I will be launching a "MySpace Outreach Page" to continue rally efforts from Americans, Congolese-Americans, Africans, Friends of the Congo and Organizations that work for peace, prosperity and the economic development of this nation. We want to help solidify and organize thousands more entities for this humanitarian cause.

I believe that Africa and the Congo's fate are definetely tied to the outcome of the US Presidential Elections.

Barack Obama, a real President in theWhite House; Change for a better World.

I'm Franklin Katunda - Barack Obama Surrogate, and I approve this Message.

Thank You !

VOTER REGISTRATION ALLEGATIONS...A GOP's Game

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:16:15 EDT

Dear Obama-Biden Supporters,

McCain has forgotten he has a link to ACORN as well, while he is accusing Obama to being close to the organization that offers community organizing and housing advocacy efforts that supports low-income people( Acorn has endorsed Barack Obama for president in this presidential election). The Mccain campaign has charged our campaign of serious allegations that we are tied to the allegedly voter registration's fraud. Now lets look at the facts about this Organtization, ACORN.

For more knoledge on what ACORN is and what they have been doing for the low income citizens for many years ( citizens whom by the way are mostly African-americans, Hispanics, Asians and other ethnics and who tend to vote "democrat") click here: www.acorn.org , and you can learn more from an aired video on CSPAN, [ in spite of a recent CNN report that members of ACORN were no where to be found for interviews ].

This is a video of a "Q&A Session" that features questions from the press newsmakers with a high level ACORN's representative. Director Bertha Lewis for NY ACORN was guest for a long interview on CSPAN, last weekend. She responded to questions related to allegations and explain her version of facts from the Interim Organization's stand point. (Video on the following link) http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=281747-1

... And this week ( today , Oct. 14 2008) directors, representatives, volunteers, and advocates from ACORN responded to questions from a various press corp at the National Press Club in Washington DC, to respond to the McCain Campaign allegations of fraud. (Video on the following Link)

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&tID=5&src=atom&atom=todays_events.xml&products_id=281772-1

More than just informing the public about the true mission of ACORN, executives from the organization have expressed that ACORN has been attacked for organizing the most successful 2006 elections' voter registration, which operation was done in the bi-partisan way.

They said registrations that show signs of fraud or are illicit are flagged and sent to the Commission of Elections for triage. The report on CNN was just an fact not well explained to the viewers to make Americans believe there was a fraud condonned by the organization. They stressed the organization always in its rules of conduct helps authorities to prosecute those who violate the law, if involved in voter fraud or forgering of documents. The Commission's worker interviewed by CNN in last week newscast was talking about cases of flagged the ACORN has the authority of turning them to the Commissin anyways.

ACORN wrote in their website a letter that clearly shows the organization has bi-partisan goals which both members of major parties always endorsed. Lately senator McCain was one among the to applaude their efforts to help citizens help themselves with issues that affect them: Low income, immigration, voter registration, housing vs. redlining, etc. Letters from the ACORN site tells the public the GOP candidate is being hypocrite, playing a game of accusing ACORN for doing just what it has been asked by the government's elections commission to do in case of irregularities.

Beyond these incidents, they stressed the fact that they have been successful doing what is a challenge, help regular citizens to get involved in the political process by registriing for vote. In a response to the ACORN letter, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis made the challenge in a statement released in response to Tuesday morning's letter. http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=12439&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=22386&tx_ttnews[backPid]=12387&cHash=5706e23a2f

They are decided (ACORN) to fight back the smears and false allegations they know the GOP has good reason to put out there, because the huge numbers turnout of voters in many states and the awarness most people in the country have shown to prevent vote suppression that happened in both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.

" As recently as February 20, 2006, Senator McCain was the keynote speaker at an ACORN-sponsored Immigration Rally in Miami, Florida at Miami Dade College – Wolfson Campus." - tells the ACORN letter ... And they added more as saying: " We expected Senator McCain to support our efforts to give voice to millions of Americans who have never participated in an election before. We are surprised at his efforts to vilify an organization that, until recently, he saw as an ally. Maybe this surprise attack and change of heart is indicative of his state of mind, and the way he would govern."

Well, it just another effort to distract the American voters, especially the independents (who are not aligned with Sarah Palin's Choice for VP); the lack of McCain consistent economic proposals for America; his bad policy as far as foreign affairs and the fate of the War in Iraq. The McCain-Palin ticket is hoping to make "ACORN" what they portrayed "MOVEON" as tied to John Kerry not later than the past recent elections and the Iraq War protests. The McCain Campaign says in a TV ad that Obama worked for ACORN in Chicago which is false according to Director Bertha, and the same added that ACORN has forced banks to give risky loans to low income citizens while ACORN officials argue the organization has fought for the low income from being "red-lining" (when banks shut out some citizens in minority neighborhoods because they are low income or because of their color of skin/ background).

ACORN says it that it has registered 1.3 million new voters this year as a community organizing and housing advocacy group that supports low-income people. Over the previous week the McCain presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee have accused ACORN of voter fraud and pushing banks into making risky home loans. On Thursday, October 9, 2008, Senator McCain called for a federal investigation of ACORN and on Friday Senator McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, said that Senator Obama's ties to ACORN should be investigated. After the interview, the reporters discussed her responses with the host.

The Director argued that the deregulation of the financial system, the greed in part of banks have contributed in an allocation of loans to customers who could not afford them; practices her organization has been monitoring and demanded the banks and loaners to make sure citizens are informed before buying decisions. Most of methods used were: First time home buyer's seminars in minority neighborhoods.

What do We Learn from this whole thing?

- ACORN linked to VOTER REGISTRATION FRAUD and possibly to the BANKING CRISIS/MORTGAGE;

- OBAMA mocked for being a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER

The whole allegation shows the GOP's plan to undermine the effort of an organization that bring in more voters to the polls, and an effort from McCain campaign to link "minority" homeowners to the cause of the CRISIS in Wall Street. What an insult to the American people !!!

Obama Friends, (Canvassers, Obama Call-Center Operators, Field Organizers and Precinct Captains) Let stay aware of their tactics!

Please talk about to our friends and relatives. Bring more out there to vote!

I'm Franklin, an Obama Surrogate;

And I approve this message!

SARAH PALIN or McCAIN 's Wrong JUGDMENT?

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:41:50 EDT

Dear Obama Friends,

We are at 23 days of the November victory; at the finish line of this long lasting campaign in the history of US. Our economy is in crisis in Wall Street as a result of less oversight of our market system and the deregulation some politicians called (among them John McCain) for our financial institutions; The executive and legislative branches and now our financial market suffer of a known seed of corruption and the influence from the lobbyists in Washington DC.

We are reminded of many scandals of our government such as the firing appointed officials without cause; 2008 reminds voters that our government has been violating our fundamental rights as citizens, violating in many instances the constitution of the United States. Barack Obama (D, Illinois), first time black candidate with a serious chance to win the election, has run a good campaign which has been all inclusive and diverse; focused on the issues and only on the issues. First, he run agaisnt Hillary Clinton (a long time democratic opponent during the primaries) and succeeded to overcome the obstacles in his way in order to deliver to the american people.

Sen. Obama got tested and was vetter for two years and responded to various issues the country is facing. He came out with early proposals such as Healthcare for All...A first and inclusive version that would bring the country to universal healthcare plan. He also at a personal level, underwent scrutinity that ordinary candidates don't go through given he was new to the manistream. His race and background helped and hurt him in various ways compared to Sarah Palin whom McCain spoke to only twice before he picked her. Fox News and other right wing outlets spent time screaming and obssessing on some facts surrounding Obama's vetting process. Today, only a few pundits and syndicated radio fanatic talk shows agree with the same media's argument that Governor Sarah Palin has been vetted lesser than was her other fellows like Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and other Huckabee...

The McCain-Palin campaign, on the other hand, has run a poor race addressing important issues since the primaries; a negative campaign in the final days of the election, injecting by their rhetoric (both McCain and Palin) the race, the smears in their speeches and ads, and igniting hate and violence among their right-wing supporters.

Given the poll numbers and the gains Obama Camp is enjoying, the Economy but more the rhetorics developed in recent weeks, it is safe to suggest that John McCain has made a wrong choice to the ticket as far the vice-president pick at the moment when the US is facing the most critical financial crisis in the history.

His choice for Gov. Sarah Palin might just frustrate their electorate, (which shos signs now) because all she does (energizing negatively the base of the Republican Party) radically alienates the American in their majority.

She did not convince the independents, and far is she still to convince the Democrats (men or women), - disaffected Clinton's supporters to go her way. Two reasons why Sarah Palin was a wrong choice for the job: Republicans ( like John McCain) think this election is about personality because of the aura Hillary and Barack have displayed with their supporters and voters during the primaries. Sarah Palin (a woman) has positions on issues and philosophy that are fundamentally not in line with the NOW American people's aspirations.

She also has been a bad case of "Mavericks", especially when the troopergate and some of her comments on the US constitution define her as an elected official with most flawded understanding about the use of the power in the executive branch: Palin calls for expanded power to the Vice President (while Americans see Dick Cheney as a portrait of an official who abused his authority in many instances). Her gubernatorial past dealings in Alaska has proven she can overuse her power to get what she needs done. This is an example that reminds Americans of George Bush's bad handling of foreign affairs and our decision to occupy Iraq.

All she got in her agenda (which she does well is spread among fearful voters), is a seed that fuels the language of hate, violence and animosity towards the opposite candidate. Using past happenings to smear and portray Obama as an unpatriotic is just wong; misrepresent facts on issues and positions he stands for are a pure failure in debating skills. Sarah Palin happens to be a debater who avoids questions and speaks of her opponent with a desdaigning and condescending attitude. That's about all she can offer to the McCain's bid.

The first McCain choice (the VP pick) after being nominated by his party was wrong, and America while apparently excited just about her first introduction, now rejects her pick all together when it comes to the issues and more her personality!

Now and unto victory!

I'm Franklin, and I approve this message!

Electorate Democrats Are Likely to Win in November 2008

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:03:27 EDT

Electorate Democrats Are Likely to Win in 2008

1. The Education (Parents and Teachers) Vote: (Joan, Joe Biden’s wife is a devoted teacher who supports Barack’s Plan of 4,000 tuition credit for college students )

2. The Union Vote (Vice-President Joe Biden is a Friend a PA, IO, NH, OH, FL union voters to whom he appeals to. Other Democrat surrogates Dodd, Richardson and Al Gore have appealed as well.

3. The Working Class Vote (Obama-Biden is advocating for a tax cut to 95% middle class working Americans whose average salary is under 250K per year. Versus Bush-McCain tax cut to big companies that ship the jobs overseas)

4. The Woman Vote (Hillary Clinton’s 18 Million voters were not just women, but also men who believed in her strong Leadership on working Americans issues, which Mc Cain has hard time defending on the behalf of independents and Reagan Democrats). Sen. Hillary and Pres. Bill Clinton fully endorsement at the DNC solidified this base) .Biden with a Women Protection Act Against Violence gives him more appeal to women than Republican VP Palin; new to the process, empty in her stances for women, and has no women’s concerns record that would sway a left-and-center political constituency . This year’s agenda on women’s issues which is clearly focusing on the Economy: Working women issues are more at stake instead of Women and family values and country’s pride issues in time of war (2004).

5. The Anti-War Vote (Obama opposed the war from its beginning while McCain refuses to end it; Sen. Obama made along with senator Biden tough decisions in senate’s foreign relations committee to deal with the complexity of funding our troops necessary to keep them from harm’s way, but repeatedly called from a time table to draw down the troops from Iran.

6. The Healthcare For All is crucial to most middle income Americans and McCain-Bush’s plan will leave Million of Americans uninsured, a burden to emergency rooms and hospitals, an national social issue that impact the American taxpayers at the macro-level.

7. The National Security Vote is a disputed concern by all Americans (Democrats, Republicans and Independents) when a question must be answered: Who better to protect America? A war veteran incumbent party senator paired with Novice Alaskan VP or A charismatic Young Leader/ Experienced Foreign Relations Senator. Given the bad handle of our diplomacy and our foreign policy in the world and our military strength which are questionable, Democrats have all reasons to win in November 2008.

Biden, An Asset for the Obama Camp and The Party

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:38:11 EDT

Dear Obama Supporters,

Gooood Mooorning! We finally have the democratic VP, and like I said in my past blog post, we need to embrace Barack Obama's choice, knowing that the campaign is well informed on strategies we need to put in place in order to win the elections in November.

Joe Biden represents the steadfast strenght of the Democrtic Party that leads by principles, not by opportunity. He is an embodiement of foreign policy allied to sound experience; judgement in leadership when it comes to the Iraq pull out, the war on terror and diplomacy with foreign leaders.

Joe Biden has been in DC for decades, but have shown a unique personality to stay ordinary while everyone loses their cool. Biden resonates well with the middle class America. The guy rides the train every day back and forth between wilmington DE and washington DC. He remained apart from all other folks who make money in bundling gifts, lobbying gratification transactions, earmarks that build "bridges out of no-where"

Joe Biden and Barack Obama are a combination of the OLD America and its YOUTH, a balanced embrace to Technology and the Traditional, the marriage between the rural America versus the urban one, the renewed relationship between races in America reenforcing the notion and tradition of diversity in the democratic party that will bring CHANGE in mentality, personality and leadesrhip in Washington DC.

A hard worker in US senate committees, and a respected US leader in the world.

Congratulations Obama Camp!

VP Choice: What Obama Supporters should Keep in Mind

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:34:32 EDT

Dear Obama Supporters,

Just a few more hours, maybe days, we will know by text message, the name of the democratic pick for vice-president candidate for democrats. The VP pick is a very crucial episode that will determine the energy and the chances our campaign will need to stay on the message and win with the same determination we started with back in february 2007.

I personnally joined the Obama For America campaign the day I heard the profound words and his inspiring stances on the challenges America faces, and when I watched senator Barack Obama at the historical steps of the Illinois capitol building, speaking on that cold day in Springfield, Illinois.

This Saturday, another event will forcast the future of our campaign at the same steps to report to the same people: grassroots organizers, democrats and independents voters that came to listen to our message for a new America. Senator Obama, despite McCain's poor tactics, is working at the community level and is still strong with that "active" electorate like never before in the history od our nation. We remember that Senator Obama came back to Iowa after securing the nomination to report to his supporters and keep them proud of what they have started with less bets of success. The whole thing shows a symbol of leadership in Obama not just a crowd he enjoys. Obama is an American leader who remebers every step of his journey: He goes back to the people and report the camp's level of progress; reason why we had crowds in Iowa twice, in NH, now in Springfield IL. And tomorow....in Virginia and Denver.

Whether he chooses Senator Joe Biden (D, Delaware), Evan Bayh (D,Ind), Gov Tim Keane (D,Virginia) or Gov. Kathleen Sibelius (D, Kansas) for VP, I wish and am asking the Obama supporters and volunteers to be supportive and trusting of the Senator's decision, which will be reflecting the realities of who can bring a good set of VP skills, the needed electorate to the polls, the enthusiasm American needs to turn from Bush's shame; who will be confortable to carry and inspire the message of change with the new realities it is facing in the general elections. The realities of our challenges to win would even require at some point, a Hillary Clinton (D, NY) pick (if necessary) to solidify our base against McCain cynical and aggressive approach in the ways of negative campaign he enjoys now.

We know the message of change reflected better with most Americans in the primaries (democrats, leftists, independents and some republicans), but in the pursuit of the general elections against the GOP machine, unlike the experience we had vs. Clinton's past race in the primaries, the theme "Change vs. Experience" once again on display on the trail will need a boost from the theme: "Good Judgement to Lead" with or without "clean and articulate" or just "popular" DC insiders; reason why Obama's VP choice may be nuanced and well calclated to uphold those realities when our campaign has the hard job ahead to prove the Iraqi War has to end and our troops to be out in 16 months, that we need to refocus in Afghnistan-Pakistan borders, that we need to tackle with dignity, leading by example and principles, other countries' relationships where diplomacy is needed to change the face of America in the world.

The Obama camp would need at the same time to sell a good face and good faith of America to the world )cr Obama 200,000 crowds in Berlin, his middle-eastern and european tours) while we will stay on message, solidifying its commitment to rebuild the economy, to jobs creation, to healthcare for all, to energy independence plan that would cut our dependency on foreigh oils, will respect an US environment's commitment...and free us from the new factor we have to pay attention to in order to win on the war on terror. Our Oil producers and lobbyists will resist Obama and they have done it so wihen we listen to McCain's stance about his "no-immediate-results" offshore-fuel drilling plan to pander to middle class voters.

Barack Obama will need to rally and win the independents and republicans from McCain campaign's out-of-touch unreal policies, his camp's lies, demeaning racial slurs in TV ads (Paris Hilton) in books (Mr Corsi's), on television (Fox News), by way of its swift-boating surrogates, on the Radio (Sean Hanity and Rush Limbaugh) and on the internet search engines and in voters' emails.

Obama has the choice to champione his message of change by still appearing as the presidential candidate "ready to lead on day one" alone as president, and also by sticking for the sake of winning a confused electorate, sceptic americans in their government, reluctant conservatives and hillsupporters with either New Faces in the White House: Keane and Bayh or DC's Insiders: Clinton or Biden or just a New Face Female: Gov Sebelius. Senator Obama can still win over McCain with the help of his VP choice, our strong grassroots organization we have, a good team of campaign managers and strategists we already have.

So, with one mind, determination we need to stay the course in grassroots actions and on the message and to brace up hard for a tough battle in all 50 battleground states.

Saturday in Springfield IL, Monday in Denver, CO and by the 28th of August, we must all hit the road and do the very same thing we did in the primaries to win door-to-door, call after call, email after email. The Manchester NH' experience (May 17th 2007) is a good illustration of what a kick off for a general elections campaign can be once again.

With the convention's energy, the VP choice, the help of the surrogates (inclunding the Clintons, superdelegates), our Campaign field organizers, our valuable precinct captains and our thousands of volunteers nationwide, we will prevail in these 2008 Elections.

I'm Franklin Katunda, an Obama Surrogate and I approve this message.

Thursday, Aug 21 2008

2008 Election; The Real History Making in America

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 25 May 2008 11:11:38 EDT

2008 Election; The Real History Making in America

Cancun,Mexico, May 25th 2008 -- Hillary Clinton said she regrets referencing to the 1968 Robert Kennedy’s assassination in her remarks, but failed to explain why she made them, as the Bosnia sniper shots, repeatedly at two different occasions according to (May 23 2008) questions by CNN anchor, Wolf Blitzer to the Clinton’s campaign advisor Maggie Williams.

Senator Robert Kennedy, who was running for office in 1968 was shot at the latest (June) primary contest in a Los Angeles Hotel. For Senator Clinton to mention that historical fact on the campaign trail as a way to explain why she is staying in the race five days before June 2008 raises eye brows to anyone who knows the history of the Kennedy and our country.

Here what she lately said: "My husband (Bill Clinton) did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary, somewhere in the middle of June, right?"…"We all remember, Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California, I don't understand it," – Hillary Clinton in an interview with the Argus Leader Newspaper Editorial Board.

The focus in these remarks, as many opinions now suggest, was targeted (not to John McCain) but to a fellow Democrat, Senator Barack Obama who is the only hopeful democrat with a clear chance to win the 2008 nomination, and a man who is enjoying the Kennedy family endorsements ( JFK’s daughter Caroline, Brother Ted- the Capitol Hill’s most Senior Senator, the young Senator Patrick and the RFK’s son, Max Kennedy whom I lately met while working with Fort-Worth/Dallas field organizers for Obama before theTexas primaries).

Making a comment referring to the Kennedy’s assassination in context to explain why Hillary Cinton stays in the race, clearly, shows that the Clinton camp is waiting and ultimately is hoping for any possible occurrences (from gaffes to health reasons, possibly death by assassination) in the course of the nominating process. She is suggesting to the super delegates anything could happen to the “inevitable” and viable African American nominee for president of the United States of America.

I don’t think the Clintons realized they lost the popular black vote and the trust Bill and Hillary (taken separately) enjoyed from the larger part of the American people few weeks before South Carolina, only because the American voters refused to share their racially- stained comments in this 2008 contest. Hillary lost an important bloc, she absolutely need as a Democrat to win the White House. Unlike her, Barack Obama can still win larger electorate (Jews, Whites over McCain in the general elections than Hillary can do with what I call now the new majority vote = from minorities: A larger proportion voters from new demographics made of Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and other nationalities)

Though, Barack Obama underwent a damaging right-wing radio talks and biased press attacks from Fox News he has proven as polls can read he still appeal steadily in large numbers to the American voters. What can be damaging more than the Republican pundits, calculatedly, suggesting the senator was Muslim because of his grand parents’ middle name, before they flipped tactics to “admit” he was a Christian for 20 years in an African American local church. The short of their smears to finally associate Obama’s views on America to the ones of Louis Farrakhan or his former pastor end up backfiring on McCain’s Evangelical Ministers Haggee and Parsley’s endorsements. If candidates are to be judged based on who they can be associated to or those endorsed them, than McCain Endorsers’ views on “The Jews and the Holocaust”, the “Islam Vs. America” and the “Catholic Church called the Anti-Christ Sect… The Great Whore”, are more than compromising by the same standards.

Attacks made headlines for about a year with what they called Rev. Wright’s racially charged or anti-American comments on YouTube and Fox-“Noise”, yet the Obama Camp weathered down those storms with eloquence and wisdom, speaking to the past experiences our country knows better and has still to deal with; He commended the urgency for change in the ways we, racially and culturally, see one another as a country; that we should surpass these old talks on gun rights in a challenged economy, religious values in a diverse society that we call to be and to focus on what will bring healthcare, good education, good economy and paying jobs to Americans.

In one word, these attacks do damage candidates, but mostly distract voters’ CHOICE and unfavorably weaken the voters’ VOICE in the White House. Thank God a few more millions of Americans understand that. Yet, for Hillary Clinton to say “anything” –here suggesting a likelihood of harm’s way on a fellow opponent on the trail to win a nomination is beyond the known tactics in the American history. It’s beyond the outrage and makes its author very unscrupulous as a Democrat politician.

Should Hillary Wait Around, (but) on the Side Lines?

As we watched the 2008 race unfolding, we noticed candidates who bravely suspended their campaign with a possibility for a re-launch if a presumptive nominee defects or is later found incapable to assume the functions as a possible nominee or future president: Democrat John Edwards, Republican Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee and many others are just a few to cite in a very recent presidential election. Sen. Barack Obama with his 1969 pledged delegates he won nationwide became the candidate with the majority of pledged delegates needed and required by the DNC for the 2008 democratic nomination; he is the only party’s hopeful to that 2,026 magic number to win the nomination.

If the Clinton Camp can politically grasp this in order to explain why Republican Romney said while dropping out: “I’m stepping aside for the sake of the party and for our country… ” Or why John Edwards conceded to his powerfully “anti-poverty” campaign’s message on the ruins of the New Orleans 9th ward? If the Clinton can resist the other candidates’ arguments while dropping out, and has invoked a horrible memory as a reason to stay in race then they can be sure about one thing: They are not ordinary politicians…They are not a political machine, but disgrace .Not to mention that Edwards who now backs Senator Obama had won but conceded to his 13 delegates stripped in Florida because the local DNC had broke the party’s rules, yet Sen. Edwards never voice up on a possible re-run in Michigan and Florida where they all agree not to campaign in.

The Clinton Camp forgets to understand there is a political dignity to preserve here; and while other candidates suspend their campaigns, they have also better reason not to leave. John Edwards gave a clear and acceptable argument that he wishes not to be an obstacle to the history making when two clear frontrunners immerged after his South Carolina loss.

Clinton “only” regrets for mentioning Kennedy …Not for implying Obama

In her quick trial to rebut from remarks perceived as another attempt by her campaign to entertain fears of possible assassinations on a viable African American US President, and after Bill Clinton’s Jesse Jackson embarrassing commentary, the Geraldine Ferraro’s unfortunate racial observations on Senator Obama, (not to include) all of her 12 months-long high-pitched surrogates’ demeaning comments about Obama’s past use of drugs, his religion affiliation, his church membership … or his middle name… Hillary Clinton, desperate and running out of tactics, money, possibilities and time, had still failed to tell us why she regrets only for referring (twice, I might add) in different appearances that the Kennedy assassination can be an event we might possible face as democrats.

Hillary Clinton regrets her comments did not reflect how she “feels” about the Kennedy and the Massachusetts Senator, battling with a tumor cancer, now at his Hyannis Port/Cape Cod home, but still senator Clinton cannot explain the correlation she makes between the two suggestions; why does she thinks or hopes a similar 1968 Bob Kennedy ill-fated criminal scenario might happen (again); and why to her only direct opponent (Senator Obama)?

Slip in tongue, a stupid mistake, a set of ill-chosen words? I don’t think any of these suppositions apply: She was explaining a thinking here that suggests that in a political “unlikely” happenings can take place while in the process of a nomination; one of which her only left hope is likely a bad happenstance.

Clinton recently who capitalized her wins in densely white and small town states of Pennsylvania, Kentucky and Indiana proved she can be trusted when it comes to exploit her opponents’ remarks. The ad and media coverage she got on “bitter” comments made by Obama, played the race card in the minds of voters, more than we could imagine. The Clintons have by doing so suggested what in 2008 most Americans do not believe in; because they know we are a country of a more diverse population with now fast growing economic interest groups and immerging electoral demographics.

Far more, Americans are lesser and lesser inclining, as suggest the latest polls, to base their high office’s choice on candidate’s race or gender. By the way, John Edwards would be a better 2008 democratic nominee, as a white man/champion of working class Americans, if the assertion were true. Senator Obama is enjoying endorsements from former fellow candidates because they can rely on proposals he has for America: Chris Dodd (D, Conn), Bill Richardson (D, NM); John Edwards (D, NC) while Hillary has not succeeded to demonstrate any form of credibility to these formidable 20 to 30 years experienced-fellow senators and governors; she has failed to really make the case she will deliver in what they believe in.

Hillary, playing her “last” card, five days before June 2008, to court super delegates, cannot ensure them like she failed with her former Democrat hopefuls that, as Democrats, despite of her place next to Bill Clinton in “his” past 8 years in the oval office, she can deliver a viable Democratic Administration that can bring the country together. The same feeling is true for the super delegates, when in an attempt to “court” or to “panic” them, she succumbed into unfortunate remarks that reminded us her million more ideas they have always played: “Two for the price of One”, she had tried to sell before. “You have me, you got Bill… sold before the SC primary…. “He Can’t Win” after Gov. Richardson initiated a big switch “move” in super delegates. I am in all the way to the nomination, after North Carolina and Indiana. Speaking out of their own electoral campaign’s playbook she says: “I am the candidate who can win the most white / female voters…” she unashamedly implied about her opponents to voters in West Virginia.

The latest idea behind her Kennedy remarks: “ You have me… We don’t have to fear another 1968 tragedy”. Now, what’s next before the nomination?

A Column by Franklin Katunda.

An Obama Surrogate, vacationing in Cancun Mex. May 25th 2008

Why Still Canvassing for Obama in North Carolina?

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 25 May 2008 10:56:01 EDT

Why Still Canvassing for Obama in North Carolina?

Charlotte, North Carolina May 2nd 2008 – Even after a double-digit loss for Obama in Pennsylvanian primaries, I decided still to head back on the road to work for his campaign and to get out the vote in the remaining contests. I flew in from Washington DC to Charlotte NC, on weekends of April 28th and May 3rd for a final push; this was about 3 days before the crucial North Carolina and Indiana May 6th primaries.

Canvassing for Obama, listening to FOX NEWS radio...

During the first week, I worked under enormous pressure as I canvassed in the streets of the city of Charlotte; in places like Albermarle Rd, Central Ave and Sharon Amity Areas. I remember listening to Fox News (very popular radio on the Carolinians’ waves) while it run tirelessly its daily “breaking news” at every other top of the hour: “The Rev. Jeremiah Wright appearance at the DC’s National Press Club”. Wow… I had to hear that unpleasant propaganda and still be encouraged in my rental car around. I definitely was embedded with hope that I can convince and to talk to voters about Senator Barack Obama in spite of what I know they might have heard before I got to their door steps.

How in the world a press organization can go that low, making a non-political figure’s speech a campaign trail’s headline and even more a daily “every top of the hour” breaking news for the entire day. Fox News gave that Wright’s appearance in DC the same amount of attention they gave with a media frenzy to Paris Hilton Arrest’s episode or the Anna Nicole Court’s Case … Even more, Fox wanted us to believe that the Rev. Wright’s conference was all they had to cover for the day.

Well, Senator Barack Obama and the campaign made it clear, thank God, that moving forward, that although him being his former pastor at the Trinity Church of Christ, Jeremiah. Wright’s relationship to the candidate won’t be the same and that he does not speak for our campaign nor does he represent the Senator’s views. That weekend’s trip in Charlotte NC was my biggest challenge in my entire canvassing experience for Barack Obama. Keep in mind here that I have been in the cold streets of Candia, Manchester, Nashua, NH; I organized and called volunteers and voters in Boston’s Jamaica Plain neighborhoods; I planted yard signs along streets in Virginia and helped register thousands on the Virginia Primary Baloot for Obama; I took a high attitude and poised look while talking, at their door steps, to resilient Texans, even those who say to me they will never vote for a black man. Driving around the streets of Charlotte for a door-to-door visit to voters seemed hard because I personally had to hear the whole Jeremiah Wright’s live-speech and a bogus post-speech news commentator’s analysis that went on for the day.

What do North Carolinians know about this 2008 election?

Yet, North Carolinians seem, from my talks with many, to be more thoughtful than the right-wing media pundits suggest and were more leaning towards Senator Obama than the Clintons have calculated. In every household, there is this belief that it’s time for North Carolinians to exercise their judgment in voting after many early contests took place (41 already). They are concerned about the Economy (particularly the gas price and the unemployment); they are looking for a government that John Edwards promised some of them to fight for. Can Obama carry the fight on poverty they so much believed the Senator from Chapel Hill with? In any case it seems to be just an Obama’s fight now. Many voters I talked to are doubtful about the Clintons’ message regarding fighting for the working men and women…for fighting poverty in America; also most voters lost trust in them given their deceiving showing for the last 2 months (Bill and Hillary) on the campaign trail.

There is that lack of discipline among the Clintons’ surrogates that seem to bother most voters here in NC; their choices to use negative ads against their party’s fellows to bait voters on TV, their SNL show’s characterization and their many evening TV appearances before the primaries were not well welcomed by southern voters here, although seen as a fair game by the media.

The long fight between Democrats has become a disservice to the American People. Voters are also very critical of the lies they heard (the Hillary landing in Bosnia under sniper attacks) and promises made in order to pander to voters (gas tax from summer to labor day) in order to win an election. In deed, Hillary Clinton has poorly sold that ineffective idea to the voters while the Washington Post was reporting last week that “this gas tax would save to an average American household only 18$ of their pocket money, according to a study made by an independent organization on the proposal. Republican John McCain who inspired Clinton on his first vocal economic idea of the 2008 decision, cannot at this time be counted as that so-called “Maverick” people got used to see from the 2000 elections; he has given many voters many reasons to believe he cannot deliver on those economic solutions given the stakes.

He and Hillary have launched the proposal to continue gaining terrain after they unfairly attacked Obama about his former pastor’s comments (not his) and mischaracterized what he said about voters who are frustrated with their government’s business dealings. So, calling the straight talk bus rider a maverick in 2008 is like comparing the so-aligned with the distrust that the American people have towards their government to a fresh face senator who can still pull in a 35 thousands people’s rally in Philadelphia on a night while trailing in the polls, and it is like ignoring what the libertarian and registered-republican candidate Ron Paul has to offer as far as patriotism, suppression of big government and his anti-war sentiments as to compare them to a John McCain’s line of speech on Iraq and his so-out of touch views of our economy.

This is what's at stake…in this election

I have made these costly trips to Charlotte NC, knowing and still believing that we will prevail, even if the status quo will continue to resist. I still see as many other Obama canvassers I met there from SC, Georgia and Texas and the wonderful staff at the Elizabeth Ave/ Hawthorne Office: Santiago or Molly… that we can deliver a victory all the way to the democratic nomination. From my past experience with the Obama Camp, I would challenge those supporters who feel like giving up on this journey. I have got one thing to say: I have canvassed for a half-year in the cold and icy streets of New Hampshire and I’ve organized voters in high-crime quarters and corners of Metro stations in Boston Massachusetts; I have planted lawn signs along local streets and have supported in Virginia and collected petition’s signatures for Obama. 30 thousands signatures were needed for to put the canditate’s name on the Virginia ballot; I also canvassed in Arlington and Fort-Worth, Texas.

During all these episodes, I have always in mind that if we can win a state primary or a state caucus, it is not just because of the candidate’s message but because of the hard work we can as campaign staffers and volunteers put forth at the grassroots level. That civic engagement alone has been effective and powerful in convincing the undecided voters. So, I say to these fellow supporters, hold your head up, suit your gear back up and run; continue the fight!

We are in fact the backbone of this campaign; a movement that enlists Americans who are determined to see change in the ways our politics affects our citizenry. We are citizens who want to challenge the status quo in place in Washington DC and in our home states leadership. By the status-quo I also mean: people (voters) who will always wait until the last minute hoping to be helped (the old school way) in their choice for a candidate: The old school way suggests that a campaign was properly laid out on the issues, voters ought to be fed with some last minute negative ad; people who do not vote based on sound judgment, facts and candidate’s profile, but by name recognition, who are proud to be fanatics or who vote for a contender based on age group, racial or gender preferences…. The only way to win against the political establishment represented by Hillary Clinton and John McCain is to go after them with a coalition of voters (all racial backgrounds) like we have been doing since the beginning in Iowa and New Hampshire. The reason why people campaign and vote for Obama is not because somehow America now wants a black candidate as a symbol of change…

Our Movement is not about color or gender, It's the American Deal for Generations

The reason I met a bunch of Irish-Americans in New England, campaigning with me for Obama, the reason why 85% of the staff and volunteers at the Manchester NH Office were Whites; the reason why we won states with working class citizens like Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, Washington State by big margins; the reason why we conquered many other majority-white states like Utah, Nebraska, Idaho, North Dakota versus states with whites-blacks demographic splits like Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama or New Orleans… The reason why we won states with urban, suburban and rural working class population like Illinois, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware is because Americans want a new face in the oval office to set the country in a new direction. The reason why we delivered states with large percentages of anti-war activists like Vermont, Minnesota, Maine… and Virginia is because the American people have decided to turn the page for a new chapter in the American foreign policy and diplomacy..

Now Americans abroad (Europe, Africa, Asia etc.) are all for Barack Obama results indicate; He won in off-the continental USA…In Alaska, Hawaii and in the US territories of Virgin Islands and in Guam. I would like to thank my friends from Charlotte and Raleigh who made my trip easier and pleasant. Thanks to the Lubamba family for their hospitality… And with a little bit more of these moments of challenge like the North Carolina’s episode, we won’t just win an election but will transform this country.

I’m Franklin Katunda, An Obama Surrogate.

Reporting in Charlotte, North Carolina, on May 2nd 2008

obama will win PA

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:07:15 EDT

Dear Obama Supporters,

I am writting this note a day before the April 22 primary election in Pensylvania,serious as it is il will like to believe the polls seen on TV, telling Obama trailing by 5% versus Hillary Clinton and with about 9% of the undecided. This tells me after many weeks of her loosing ground in the poll, that the even the undecided are more likely to be slpit, if not to favorabily tip to onw or another side on these two candidates.

I still believe that a 48% Hillary VS Obama 43%, there is still that 9% that can help either to close the gap, up to even Hillary and maybe to egde up to 52% if we get another 4 % of the undecided to flock to him in the last 2 weeks he pushed a "On Track for Change" and "Whistle Stop" at various train stations and the remarkable 35,000 people gathering in downtown Philly, tells a lot to explain why this can happen.

The same scenario is true on the Clinton's side too. She might just capitalize on the undecided who will than be the reflection of the PA trend in this 08 race: which is to claim that with the help of Ed Rendell, the activist governor and popular figure, the endorsements of prominent PA politics like Representative John Murtha (D), Hillary can easily get the half of those 9 % of the undecided and make it with 53 to 57% of votes (a win that will remain to be seen as unsignificant in her case to stay in the race til June 3rd.

Barack Obama, ahead on delegates, on votes and number of states won, will still lead, accorning to Davis Shuster (MSNBC) the race in number of delegates if Clinton wins with a 10% or less margin.

Polls versus Momentum in PA and given the back and forth barbs betweeen the candidates, it is bizzare to see the media, not even raising a possibility of such a thing. Well, I guess we might end up with the New Hampshire's example on the favor of Barack Obama.

I am ready, however, to make a projection, given my analysis and experience as a field organizer for the Obama Camp in NH, MA, VA and TX past primaries that against of the odds, Barack Obama will carry the state of Pensylvania on Tuesday 22 and the Hilary camp will be forced to start thinking about pulling out.

Obama's Reality vs. Hillary's Fantasy

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:44:49 EDT

Bitter and Angry in Rural Pennsylvania: Obama's Reality vs. Hillary's Fantasy By astral66 - April 12, 2008, 4:40PM

Maybe there aren't Bubbas driving around in pickup trucks with the classic bumpersticker "God, Guns and Guts Made America Free" where Obama's detractors live, but here in rural Pennsylvania that line may as well replace "e pluribus unum" as the motto on the national currency.

I live in western Pennsylvania, and I can tell you, people here are bitter and angry. Poverty is prevalent. People hunt squirrels and eat them, along with racoon stew. People also hunt deer here, not for sport, but so they can put meat in their freezer so they can feed their families. They cut wood in the forests and heat their homes with wood stoves because they can't afford to pay the gas bill. I know a guy who goes to old landfills to dig up old milk and beer bottles to sell on eBay. He uses the proceeds to buy clothes for his family at the Salvation Army (and to pay for his dial-up connection).

Racism and prejudice are ever-present here. A friend of mine is part-owner of bar in a small rural town south of where I live. I meet up with him there occasionally and watch as down-and-out people come in with their disability and welfare check money and drink it away. It's a pretty depressing place, but it does serve as the social center for a town that has seen its few industries shut down and the local people's jobs eliminated or shipped off elsewhere.

I hear the usual rants there, that it's all the fault of gays and minorities and immigrants (although those aren't the terms used, but rather the usual, virulent slurs). A black man walked in the last time I was there, and a guy near me at the bar muttered in a not-so-quiet way, "What's he think he's doing in here?" When I brought up the presidential race and Obama with another man at the bar, his response was, "there ain't no way America is ever going to vote for a black guy." Later on my bar-owner friend told me about his experience talking about Obama with another woman at the bar, and her angry response was that "it's because of half-breed n*****s like him that America is in such bad shape today."

Prejudice, racism and fear do run rampant in areas like this. People are poor. They are in bad health, overweight from a deep-fried diet, and toothless from the lack of dental care. They are unemployed. They are uneducated. They do cling to their hunting rifles and to their religious beliefs. For many, it is about all that they have. The towns around here are full of decaying, boarded up buildings. People live in rundown old trailers with abandoned cars in the front yard. I have seen people using an old car as a stable, with their goat tied to and living in it. I could drive you by a least three old houses that have Conderate flags in the windows.

So go ahead and discount Obama's talk of how bitter and angry that some of the people of rural Pennsylvania are. Call him elitist for taking the time to pass through areas such as this to listen to what the people have to say, and to then relate what he has heard to people in more prosperous parts of the country when he is asked about it. I have lived in San Francisco, and let me tell you, there is a marked difference between the general attitude there and the attitude here in the "rust belt". Go ahead and dismiss everything that Obama said as political posturing. Let Hillary and McCain "pick him apart" and parse his words. But please keep in mind that when Obama said:

"it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

that he is 100% accurate in his assessment.

I know, because I live here, my family and my friends' families have lived here for generations, and we see it every day, all around this region. There is a very fine line between poverty and prosperity here, where making above $20,000 a year puts you in the realm of the "haves", but also knowing that you're one contract termination away from joining the ranks of the "have-nots".

I come from a family of dairy farmers. I know what it's like to spend up to 12-16 hours a day sitting on a tractor for three dollars an hour, which I did through high school and every summer until I was fortunate enough to head off to college. Many of my friends were also fortunate and went to school, and then relocated to other parts of the country. Some of us were able to come back under better circumstances, but the large majority of people here are not as fortunate.

Thirty years worth of the right wing dismantling our public education system has taken its toll. Thirty years worth of mismanagement of the economy, of shutting down factories and shipping jobs out of the country, of subsidizing corporate farms and taxing family farms out of business, has taken its toll.

Yes, people are angry, and bitter, but Obama never said that they aren't resilient, opitmistic or hard-working. Those are Hillary and McCain's twisted words, and for them to stand up and suggest that rural Pennsylvanians aren't fed up with the way things are, only reveals how out of touch they really are with at least this part of the country.

Of course, all McCain has to do is suggest to poor rural folk that the party of gun-control, gay marriage, and NAFTA is going to take away what little they have left, and rural conservatives will vote for him, just as they did for Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. As for Hillary, the more she "takes apart" Obama's message, the more she does the GOP's work for free. If Hillary can't see that the people of rural Pennsylvania are bitter, and angry, and mad as hell about the way things are, then she needs to step down from that one hundred million dollar platform of hers and take a real look around.

In western Pennsylvania I hear two things: the "God, Guns and Guts" crowd see John McCain as the heir-apparent to the mantle of rural conservative values; and the people who hope for some kind of change see Barack Obama as the person who understands the situation that we are in, and maybe is the one who can lead us in a new direction. What I don't hear is anyone talking about whatever and whomever it is that Hillary claims to stand for.

Why Clinton's National Enquirer Strategy Is Bound to Fail

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:37:37 EDT

The Most Shocking Story You Will Ever Read!"

-- Why Clinton's National Enquirer Strategy Is Bound to Fail

John Eskow

Wed Apr 2, 6:24 PM ET

When an outhouse-supply rag like The National Enquirer trumpets a headline like "The Most Shocking Story You Will Ever Read!", as it does in its current issue, its 7-11 readers have every right to expect something truly juicy -- hard-core proof that Elvis' ghost impregnated Katie Couric during a Satanic orgy in Dick Cheney's dungeon, at the very least. After all, the Enquirer has a reputation to maintain.

But alas, tucked in between "Mary-Kate Olsen's Drunken Binge" and Steve-O from Jackass snorting coke off some woman's thigh, "The Most Shocking Story You Will Ever Read!" -- or TMSSYWER, for short -- turns out to be a classic bait-and-switch job on a number of levels. It's the very same cynical and dehumanizing strategy that Harold Ickes is running on behalf of Hillary Clinton -- just keep drearily rehashing the non-existent "Reverend Wright scandal" and hope for the best (or the worst). And, just as the Enquirer's readership continues to plunge, so too does the future of Clinton's political campaign, in a colossal twin belly-flop. It's a marriage made in tabloid heaven.

I wrote last week about this "Obama Fathers Two-Headed Gay Terrorist Baby" strategy -- a last-ditch attempt by the sleaziest hacks in the media (and the campaign) to squeeze out a few more pitiful bucks (and votes) from the dregs of the Jeremiah Wright story. In the Enquirer's case, TMSSYWER -- delightfully subtitled "Destroy All White People!" -- turns out to be a noxious piece of journalistic three-card-monte. Too tedious and absurd to recount in detail, basically it says that Reverend Wright is admired by a Union Theological Seminary professor named James Cone, who in turn has written some incendiary black-power books -- and that Obama has "failed to speak out" about this utter non-story. It then stretches this very thin gruel even further: "Cone's chilling rhetoric finds a home in the hate speech of other radical leaders, including the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan. He has referred to Jews, Koreans, Vietnamese, and others as 'bloodsuckers'..."

Following this so far? It's Obama-to-Wright-to-Cone-to-Farrakhan -- sounds like a triple-play combo in a UN softball game. But it doesn't stop there. Once the Enquirer has hopscotched from Obama to Wright to Cone to Farrakhan, without bothering with the pesky business of making actual connections, they jump not one but two more spaces: "During a speech at Howard University -- where the Rev. Wright received his bachelor's and master's degrees -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad, then a spokesman for the Nation of Islam, lauded the actions of mass murderer Colin Ferguson. 'I love Colin Ferguson, who killed all those white folks on the Long Island train,' he said."

So -- there's your real TMSSYWER: National Enquirer links Obama to mass murderer Colin Ferguson!

By that tabloid "logic," I too have a scoop for Huffington Post readers: a TMSSYWER of my own.

"Hillary Clinton was born in Chicago, Illinois, in 1947 -- the very same city in which psycho-killer Richard Speck would brutally murder eight nurses...only nine years later! Some Internet posters even claim that Clinton 'spoke admiringly' about Speck -- but so far, despite the links, Clinton has refused to denounce him!"

Of course, as slime-meister Harold Ickes told Time magazine about the Reverend Wright scandal-that-isn't: "Nobody thinks that Barack Obama harbors those thoughts. But that's not the issue. The issue is what Republicans will do with them." By openly appealing to the lowest form of mob rule, Ickes has finally said what many of us have suspected for some time: that Clinton has abandoned any hope of winning on merit, and can only hope to appeal to what's lowest and most vile in the electorate.

It must drive the aptly-named Harold Ickes, and others of his Ickes-ilk, absolutely crazy that the American public has been so dignified and rational in refusing to snap at the Reverend Wright bait. It's like some terrible sudden breakdown in the Pavlov Machine! Damn! We flashed the Scary-Black-People signal, and the voters aren't barking in fear! So even after the Reverend Wright news-cycle has passed, Clinton strategists have nothing more positive or uplifting to offer than this straw-man fear of the Right-Wing Attack Machine.

Maybe they don't want to believe that Americans have become a little more tolerant and a little less fearful when it comes to race-baiting. But I'm starting to believe they have. And, if my hope is confirmed, that will truly be The Most Shocking Story That I Have Ever Read.

Calling For A More Perfect Union .... 40 Years Later

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:21:09 EDT

Calling for More Perfect Union… Forty Years Later,

Editorial on the 40th Anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s Assassination.

– By Franklin Katunda

Some of the seeds from King’s Legacy

Arlington, VA. –Forty Years ago, Dr Martin Luther King Jr was killed (April 4th 1968) on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis Tennessee. The most pictures we know of this American hero’s episode is, as reported by the Boston Metro, quoting Jacqueline Tarry, is the “… topic of race in general, in terms of nobler ideas of us all holding heads together and living next to each other and being brothers”. We came, forty years later, to just realize that we haven’t fully had an opened conversation about the race, racism, justice and equality in America.

The United States of America has made a few progresses in terms of recognizing some of the African-American icons emerge in the political scene. Among them, former Martin Luther King Jr’s close friend and civil rights activist, the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr (today supporting Barack Obama). He was the first black man to run for president of the US during the 1984’s are when the Cosby Show had unveiled what a black family can be to the eyes of America. General Collin Powell becomes the first black US Secretary of state in 2001 while his successor is the first African-American woman Secretary of State, Mrs Condoleezza Rice. In February 2007, Sen. Barack Obama - the only African-American seating US Senator in Congress and the 2nd only since the reconstruction, announces in Springfield IL his run for the White House.

This is Our Story

This is when my story starts, when my experience with the King’s legacy comes in place. I heard of the MLK’s movement from school, books, and from father’s stories when, in 1960-68, my father was a scholar at the first “All-Black” Howard University in Washington DC. Mr Francois Katunda (my father) was beneficiary, as was the senator’s father, Barack Obama Sr, of a scholarship that helped him obtain a degree that cemented his ¼ century-long career in Foreign Service with the US Department of State. The years 1960s were an era that defined the civil rights movement. It is known as an era of the awakening for civic engagement around the world. This fight for Human Rights in US indeed inspired many charismatic leaders; such as the long time African prisoner Nelson Mandela who went from activist to become the first black president of South Africa, so as the 1989 renowned Chinese Activists from the Tiananmen Place; the experience of another Intrepid-non-violent African political leader Etienne Tshisekedi resisting the tyrant Gen. Mobutu of DR Congo (Zaire). Martin Luther King Jr. legacy is acknowledged in Europe where Lech Valessa organized workers and helped liberating Gdansk in Poland. In my father’s native country, an heroic and brilliant young leader Patrice Lumumba challenged Belgian colonists, became a model of courage and patriotism in the Congo. This Congolese first prime minister’s life was stopped short (January 1961) by a CIA-led plot, inspired by the East-West Cold War; a spoiler to a young democracy in a 3rd world country in the heart of Africa, a country that long was under the rule of the general-tyrant Mobutu for 32 years.

1960s was an era of commotion and awakening for the American people, in a midst of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November of 1963 in Dallas TX. During the Vietnam epoch, Dr King, opposing the invasion, said: "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom." In June 1968, Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated in Los Angeles CA, only 3 months after the death of Dr King in Tennessee.

Was there “unfinished business” after America missed all these great leaders in the turmoil? I would think so …

“I have a dream”, deeply rooted in the American Dream…

Washington Post columnist E.J Dionne wrote, recalling 1968 as “… when liberalism’s moment had ended”. Liberals had been triumphant in the political arena, bringing to the American people the renaissance with the passing of the Civil Rights Act; social plans such as Medicare and Medicaid; government federal programs such as job corps and federal student aids.

The struggle for civil rights and voting rights in America was particularly successful in an era when Dr King's leadership rallied blacks, whites, Jews and many others, and led the way to inspiring and empowering other leaders and activists in America and around the world. But, the question many African-Americans ask themselves has been to know why Dr King’s deeds and legacy are still seen as an unfinished business?

Why? Because Forty years later, America is still undergoing moments of embarrassments, such as the 2005 Katrina failed emergency-response and the lacking pre-tragedy preparedness. Why? Because our country still in denial even when in 1999, a NY Police squad while shooting 41 rounds of bullets, killing an African-born immigrant, Amadou Diallo, made many to believe there is still racial profiling. No later than 2007, we witnessed a series of “racial pranks” or “hate crimes” in our schools.

The “Jena Six” case or the hanging of nooses in Louisiana, and later on the New York’s Columbia University campus prove there is still racially-based hatred among people. There is still racial disparity and economic injustice when most banks’ sub-prime loans have been signed on with minorities and low income earners from the black and Latino communities. As a result, their homes are being foreclosed on, which affects other loans, savings and other form of wealth they might have.

Justice linked to Equality brings us to digress on the state of our economy: Last month’s (March 2008) reports from the Labor Department show that 80,000 US jobs were lost while the New York Times/ NBC polls (4/4/08) suggests that 81 % of Americans now believe the country is heading, economically, in the wrong direction. If our government cannot fund schools and properly implement educational programs that will help America’s youth to compete in the global economy’s job market, than job outsourcings, unemployment, and recession will be part of our every day language in the near future.

2008 election; A 1960s comeback?

Meantime, 2008 voters are being distracted by a long and unnecessary “Obama-Clinton” electoral fight for the nomination. Clearly, with 1638 pledged delegates versus 1507 for Clinton out of 44 contests, Senator Obama will need only 387 more to close the lead on her with the help of super-delegates. Having won more states (30 vs. 14) with 10 contests remaining, still the Illinois Senator has the best chance to be the democratic nominee. But, Hillary says she can still win, one of the reasons why the Clintons feel that way, being partially, because they believe in Dr King’s dream, which applies to the idea of having the first female president of USA.

They are hoping for a “possible” political scandal that would come from fiery comments or wrongdoing in the Obama Camp, without a clear argument on how they will make their case to the DNC to win. John McCain, the Republican presumptive nominee wanted to challenge both democrat candidates in courting the "black" vote in Memphis, even if it means getting booed for the vote against making MLK’s birthday a US National Holiday. He slowly understood the meaning of his legacy, he implied in response to the crowd, while he could have not possibly ignored that Dr King had opposed the Vietnam War; fought for human rights such as (torture, physical violations and irrationality in handling wars we had no interests fighting.)

Yet, John McCain still doesn’t understand what Dr King has been deeply fighting for when he called America to focus on domestic issues by ending the war in Vietnam: He (McCain) challenged both candidates’ healthcare plans as “socialized-medicine”; he wants to keep privatized expensive health plans. He remains timid when Clinton and Obama are calling for a more affordable heath care and quality educational plans; He proposes to wait out on the economic threats of an imminent recession, and vowed not to help those citizens affected by predatory lending practices. He has not, as far as his plan informs us, given any promise to help resolve the mortgage meltdown.

Washington DC’s “status quo” and the War

Forty Years after the MLK’s opposition of the Vietnam War, the Clintons argued he (MLK) was inspiring but that it took a Lyndon Johnson to put in actions his dreams … (Which assertions the American people and particularly Obama supporters took offense on). John McCain is trying to pander to black voters to have them accept the idea to keep the invasion of Iraq permanent, refusing to accknowledge it is strongly opposed by Americans in most polls (at 60%). Forty years later, only one candidate opposed the war in Iraq since 2002, Senator Barack Obama. He now called for a safer withdrawal, and he is calling for restoring diplomacy versus pre-emptive military interventions without a clear purpose nor a winning strategy.

Speaking of the war that cost us in monies, blood and treasure, Americans are standing up against it, and more and more African-Americans are making it a MUST in order to respond to our common issues: A possibility of establishing a link between the cost of the war and the economic crisis is becoming evident in many opinions.

More African-Americans Leaders calling for Unity…

Forty years after Dr King, the Rev Jeremiah Wright’s comments brought back on the table a debate on race and racism in America; the one we long ago put on idle mode. With the same intensity Obama's stance on the Iraq War is been criticized just as the 1960s, when the media and mainstream pundits went against Dr. King’s stance on the Vietnam War. Today many have tried to wrap around democratic hopeful Barack Obama, “controversial” words that he did not say, words he vehemently denounced and rejected. “… They twisted some 30 years of some minister’s good deeds to telecast a conflicting 30 seconds-sound bytes”, said in discontent several Trinity United Church of Christ members. Many believe the “Clintons” and the “Republicans” (both representing the Status-Quo in the DC Beltway) are hoping to create a lingering debate in order to reverse, in voters’ minds, a pick between the two democrat candidates as the general elections have clearly predicted an insider (McCain) vs. an outsider (Obama).

I found it curious that a few weeks before King’s anniversary, Senator Obama has been pressured by the same pundits and the media, aligned with the DC insiders’ tactics , to have him explain comments made, not by him nor his political campaign, but by his retired pastor. Completing a Bush 2004 term, Republican-candidates distanced themselves from the real debate on poverty, racism and justice for all in America. On the other hand, on April 4th Dr King’s Day, One hundreds-twelve African-Americans elitists, civil rights land church leaders, lawyers and business persons signed an opened-letter called: “Where do We Go From Here?”

The National Coalition on Black Civic Engagement (NCBCP) members like Dr Michael E. Dyson, Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr, Martin Luther King III, Bishop Eddie Long, Rev, Al Sharpton, Dr Joseph Lowery signed the letter. Current and former public servants like the Honorable Glenda Hatchett and Calvin Smyre or Amb. Andrew Young have also petitioned the letter. We ought to mention some Arts performers, actors and anchors were among many the black elitist the country has produced in forty years: Danny Glover, Mrs. Donna Brazile, Dr. Maya Angelou or Oscar Joyner.

On this 40th anniversary day, they wrote: “…So that their voices will be clearly heard.” Senator Obama, during his "Race and Politics" speech said: “… For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the O.J. trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words.

We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policy.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.”

Likewise, the hundreds of these black leaders went on the same direction as the presidential candidate. They stepped up to expand on the debate initiated by Senator B. Obama in during his Philadelphia’s speech, outlining most proposals that borne out of the latest “State of the Black Union ” in New Orleans, LA. They called on the mainstream to stop bashing African-American churches: “… We strongly uphold the right to religious freedom of expression as reflected in our churches and other faith institutions” They have also reminded America that: “Our (African-Americans) churches have been our moral foundation and prophetic witness for justice and equality since slavery, holding up a mirror on areas where the nation falls short on these virtues.”

As wrote Kevin Merida in Washington Post, America failed 40 years after his death to tell younger generations that: “… His life has been simplified, his anger blurred, his militancy rarely discussed, his disappointments and harsh critiques of government’s failures glossed over.” -- WP, (4/4/08). Forty years later, and after the Philadelphia’s Senator Obama at the 1787 built-Convention’s Hall, many Americans still want to be honoring the Dr King’s legacy, while ignoring the content and the substance it was made of: He opposed the DCs powers; he stood up against injustice, racism and segregation.

The debate on race in America is still a dialogue that Americans must embrace candidly, constructively and brotherly in 2008, so we can all tackle challenges we have ahead of us.

Obama speech is a crucial call for a more perfect union in America, forty years after Dr King’s death and legacy.

-- Franklin Katunda

Obama for America,

April 5, 2008

General Elections: Some Republicans Now Endorsing Obama...

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:34:53 EDT

Oh yes,

While McCain is going out of country for photo op, republicans are making up their mind, in previous of the general elections.

Please read the following New York Sun's article about it. This is a good piece that can inspire an argument with John McCain, who still has no strong legs within his own party. Many say he has NO conservative credentials what so ever.

Now, on top of the chaos within his ranks, here some republican defections towards Democrats, mainly because of the "War in Iraq"... Republicans seem to know the real democrat opponent to the Iraq war's enactment; Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois who clearly stood out against it since 2003.

Please read the following link:

Franklin Katunda

An Obama Surrogate

03/31/2008

http://www.nysun.com/news/national/some-republicans-emerge-endorse-obama

With Bill Richardson, A Call for Unity, for a New Majority

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:12:35 EDT

Dear Governor Bill Richardson,

I thank God for your leadership, sincerity and courage you have shown with your endorsement to the American people's aspirations, reclaiming CHANGE in the way Washington DC is doing business.

The entire country will recognize former presidential candidates and superdelegates like you, whom with great experience in the commands of our country since the 1990s have been humble to recognize what's at stake in America, today.

Senator Obama and our campaign are grateful to you for your support to this once-in-the-generation's movement, more importantly for raising, during your 2008 conversation with America, the debate's issues that meet the American voters expectations:

1)You have championed the reduction of our dependency on foreign oil; (2) you called for an immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq, without residuals; (3) You stood up for an affordable healthcare, (4) the repealing of "No child Left Behind" and (4) You advocated for restoring our diplomacy in the world; (5) You called on for reforms of the VA medical treatments (mental health and post traumatic disorders) for our troops returning from wars, etc.

We appreciate much your participation in the 2008 civic debate, and are honored, in spite of the negatives from both, the democratic and republican status quo's attacks, you have embarked, at an unexpected moment, on the side of the American People, calling other superdelegates to start descerning that America is ready for a type of "CHANGE (that) We Can (all) Believe In"

Yes, senator Obama will (1) bring our country together and will restore the government's trust; He will (2) push lobbysts out of their DC comfort zone. He will (3) end the racial divides, the profiling of Hispanic-Americans and many other races are being victims of; he will lead the country to producing other renewable sources of energy that will cut our dependency on foreign oils. He will end the war in Iraq. (4) He will be ready to be commander-in-chief with a good, sound judgement and wisdom to take any 3am phone call.

The USA needs Unity in the light of Sen. Obama's race and religion speech, and I'm glad you are, by endorsing Barack Obama, positioning yourself and many other Hispanic-American voters to be part of this process. With this "NEW MAJORITY" vote, which includes Caucasians, Hispanics, Blacks (African-Americans, other recent US-born and naturalized Africans), Asians and Natives Americans, we are more than confident that, having won the most red states already, the Obama movement will seek the vote from Reagan-Democrats, the older and Blue-collar voters to form a working majority that will defeat John McCain, the presumptive nominee, who represents Bush and the G.O.P.'s agenda ( GOP here stands for the Government Of the Past)

I have worked in the the Obama campaign for little over a year now (since February 2007) and I have launched two online support groups; I have worked with devoted staffers and tireless grassroots volunteers from all racial backgrounds and walks of life in NH, MA, VA and TX.

Governor, I can guarantee you, as you know now, that NO remaining candidate in this 2008 election has the potential to unite America and energize our citizens to take back their government like Senator Barack Obama Jr.

Now, lets take it to the pundits and make them stay more confused til the november showdown, because when they attack our movement, predict negatives on (Obama's) our chances to lead, our campaign will always get another good bounce, another endorsement, like yours today.

We will prevail, even when this has been an unfair but welcomed "vetting process"; made of smears and negative attacks from the Clintons and the right-wing cells.

With the " Rev. Wright's Episode" that made it possible, all things considered, to shine Obama's leadership skills and wisdom, I believe that our candidate's speech-response to the incident was the best political tactic ever. Barack Obama responding to the American people, sent an ultimate call for racial and political unity in America; Now, we have no other alternative but to stand still for Change. In that respect, I am ready and proud like many other members and activists of this generational movement to be tested and called to reality-check, before our candidate's nomination.

This 2008 election remains the continuation of the 1960's movement... And that is why, for those who don't descerne yet, this election will certainly be different the ones in 1980s and 90s.

At the Obama Camp, we will stay strong and unwaivered in the face of threats of racial divisions that are known to be a longtime plague to our nation's structure, as older as the Consitution of America; Yet, we have a mission to bring hope to the cynics among us and within the Republican Party. I strongly believe that Philadelphia, the first capital-city of the Union, witness to the ideals of the Union is learning about the need for a more perfect union, under the sound of Senator barack Obama's speech.

Welcome, Governor, and lets stay "fired up" by our love for this country and "ready to-go" against McCain and his GOP's machine.

Si Se Puede, Yes We Can !!!

I'm Franklin Katunda, an Obama Surrogate and I approve this message.

March, 22 2008

The Pope’s Warning on Iraq, No Good for McCain

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:00:45 EDT

The Pope’s Warning on Iraq, No Good for McCain

As we’ve observed since its inception and now as we are meditating on the Five Years Anniversary of the War in Iraq, many American Catholics have a clear choice in the 2008 Elections.

Democrats would probably enjoy more anti-war catholics' adhesion into their ranks as many American-Catholics Leaders were infuriated with the McCain's endorsement by the Rev. John Hagee If Catholc believers listen to their local leaders than comments from Hagee, as they were debited before by many other evangelical preachers (Dobson, Robertson, Rod Parsley), making harsh statements about their faith should give them a true choice in November.

These evangelical leaders who helped Bush to re-elect in 04, tricked by the Karl Rove's notion on Family Values, are considered when it comes to our consitution and the diversity of religions and cultures in US, "hate-mongering" preachers against the Catholicism and other religions. They are also perceived in many occasions as "fear and war mongering" American preachers against Islam religoius followers (biased on their calling’s message to preach on Islam and the Arab world).

Most of them were given a press-free pass (CNN, FOX, ABC, MSNBC, CBS and many others) in terms of scrutiny of their hateful messages and radical positions when it comes to the Muslim Religion during the pre-and-now War in Iraq versus the War on Terrorism, we have lost focus on in Afghanistan.

Media, especially FOX "noise" criticized Rev. J. Wright of Chicago Trinity United Church of Christ, for having a church mission-trip to Lybia with Min. Louis Farrakan while they know ministers are called to do so, as indicated in their duties. Ministers should have no preference on leaders to talk to, neither souls to preach to, and only the US Media have failed to understand that concept nd ask profound questions on the bigotry in american politics.

Meanwhile, John McCain, the presumptive republican nominee (who benefited from the same bigotry against his own fellow, Mitt Romney because of his Mormon Faith) is on a “political tourism” trip in Europe and while has taken a "electoral" risk for an eighth “camouflage” stop in Iraq to visit the troops, the Vatican Pontifical authority issued a statement condemning the US invasion in Iraq. Pope Benedict is expecting to visit the US next month.

This week, the republican blissful McCain said to the press it is possible the resurgence of violence comes back again in Iraq while he still doesn’t see diplomacy in the lens as a tool to resolve the issue by talking to regional leaders. McCain, fragile at his legs, still doesn't enjoy a conservative base-support within his own party. Questions are arising on how will he deal with the military surge to prevail on ensuring US national security, should he be the next president? Worst, he refused to condemn anti-catholic statements made by his religious "backers", whom far have even made it hard on his foreign policy stands, stating that America is on an assignment to destroy Islam (Rod Pastor Parsley wrote in his book), and that Jews will go to hell as religious parishioners if they don’t embrace the Christian Faith (Rev. Hagee said, eventhough he openly demostrated he is a supporter of Israel vs. muslim countries)

It is clear to me that the Evangelical preachers' argument makes sense from the religious stand point, but such church leaders were not to be part of the political crowd nor be mingling the religious business (sermons, statements, philosophy) and the state affairs (Legislation, Executive Affairs) when it comes to endorsing candidates who should represent the entire population of Americans. Clearly, political candidates should distance themselves from "controversial" religious leaders whose views are in conflict with the supreme interest of the US, as a diverse nation under a constitution.

If Sen. Barack Obama was asked (using smears, attacks and lies) to distance him self from the Chicago congregation minister, Rev. Wright's comments, yet no tough questions have ever been asked to Senator McCain, the right-wing media cells and their cheerleaders, such as Bill Cunningham of Cincinati, OH!

Neverthless, the unfolding of all these developments will benefit both Democrat hopefuls running for the 2008 presidency and ultimately Mr. Barack Obama, (D,Ill)who is seen here as the only candidate who can have 2008 voters on both sides sing “E PLURIBUS UNUM” in the general elections. He is the only remaining on the field to have opposed the Invasion of Iraq and because Congress (including senators McCain R, AZ and Hillary Clinton D, NY) gave President Bush a blank check to do so; Yes, senator Barack Obama had played his role, using good judgment, on the senate business when it comes to give a chance to both the Bush Administration and the Iraqi leadership to set a political agenda while US troops should be allowed to gradually leave. He voted to fund/support the troops already on the ground and in the arms way until the republicans in the White House and Congress decided a military surge was a better way to win and stay indefinetely in Iraq.

They rather called for a surge without asking for an Iraqi Reconciliation which calls for regional talks with "ally and enemy" of the US in the Middle-East. Republicans refused a timetable withdrawal of our troops that would have sent a signal to the Iraqis to find a political consensus. Obama refused to undermine our chances to refocus on the right war by opposing the latest bill to fund the troops, and calls for an end to this wrong war on DAY ONE of his presidency if Bush fails until then, and calls to refocus on the real war on terror against Usama Bin Laden.

Now, since Obama’s been calling for a withdrawal of our troops since 2004, it makes sense to assume that he would surely benefit with that best chance to get the “catholic vote” in the general elections, should he become the democratic nominee, and if the Obama Camp, forcefully, frames the debate. The Camp should tactically keep emphasizing with more detailed-plans and strong arguments on the behalf of the American people. They should make a clear separation with the Clinton's stand which has been weakening the path to ending the war. His startegists should make a case with catholic voters that he is the right candidate to defeat McCain, and bring the troops home. Finnally, they have got to reach out to the Army cambattants' families who are calling for their loved-ones to return home.

This violence in Iraq, a humanitarian crisis for iraqis and a national security issue for the US, has got to end.

I'm Franklin Katunda,

An Obama Surrogate, and I approve this Message

+++ Read Article from the AP:

Pope: Enough with slaughters in Iraq

By Nicole Winfield, AP Writer

VATICAN CITY - Pope Benedict XVI issued one of his strongest appeals for peace in Iraq on Sunday, days after the body of the kidnapped Chaldean Catholic archbishop was found near the northern city of Mosul. The pope also denounced the 5-year-long Iraq war, saying it had provoked the complete breakup of Iraqi civilian life.

"Enough with the slaughters! Enough with the violence! Enough with the hatred in Iraq! " Benedict said to applause at the end of his Palm Sunday Mass in St. Peter's Square.

On Thursday, the body of Archbishop Paulos Faraj Rahho was found near Mosul. He had been abducted on Feb. 29 Benedict has called Rahho's death an "inhuman act of violence" that offended human dignity.On Sunday, Benedict praised Rahho for his loyalty to Christ and his refusal to abandon his flock despite many threats and difficulties.He recalled Rahho's death as the Catholic Church opens Holy Week, the most solemn week in the liturgical calendar in which the faithful recall the suffering and death of Jesus Christ.

Benedict said Rahho's dedication to the Catholic Church and his death compelled him to "raise a strong and sorrowful cry" to denounce the violence in Iraq spawned by the war that began five years ago this week."At the same time, I make an appeal to the Iraqi people, who for the past five years have borne the consequences of a war that provoked the breakup of their civil and social life," Benedict said.He urged them to raise their heads and reconstruct their life through "reconciliation, forgiveness, justice and coexistence among tribal, ethnic and religious groups.

"The Vatican strongly opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. In its aftermath, Benedict has frequently criticized attacks against Iraqi Christians by Islamic extremists. Last year, he urged President Bush to keep the safety of Iraqi Christians in mind. Benedict is due to preside over a memorial service at the Vatican on Monday in honor of Rahho.

Typically, the pope only presides over such services when a cardinal dies.The pontiff's appeal for peace came at the end of his Palm Sunday Mass, which opens the Church's busy Holy Week celebrations. They include the Good Friday re-enactment of Christ's crucifixion and death and the celebration of Christ's resurrection on Easter Sunday.At the start of Mass, Benedict blessed palms and olive branches with holy water and then processed through St. Peter's Square, wearing intricate, red- and gold-brocaded vestments and clutching a woven palm frond.

In his homily, Benedict urged the faithful to follow God with the innocence and purity of a child's heart."To recognize God, we must abandon the pride that dazzles us, that seeks to push us away from God," he said. To find God, he said, "we must learn to see with a young heart, one which isn't blocked by prejudice and dazzled by interests."A few hundred young people carried massive palm fronds at the start of the procession through the square as part of the lead-up to celebrations for the Catholic Church's annual World Youth Day. Benedict plans to attend World Youth Day in Sydney, Australia, in July.

- an AP's article

How Can A 20 Years Known-Christian be Labelled a Muslim?

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:56:11 EDT

Dear Friends,

I just wanted to point a fact we are hearing on the news, without the media making sure they ask tough questions to those who debit the comments. We heard people discussing themes over Barack Obama, being a muslim and being part of a conspiracy to destroy America once elected.

A Boy with a funny name...

Pundits like Bill Cunningham, Sean Hannity (FOX News Channel or FNC wich stands now for... Full of Neo-Cons), and Rush Limbaugh suggest that Senator Barack Obama's church and pastor are a problem as far as him becoming the US president. A game we hae seen in the past when we were in elementary scholls. This is a scenario far from just a group of racial mainstream kids making fun of a shy boy in classroom, it goes sophisticated beyond "Jenna 6" to suggest that the "Fear" of a name, of certain cultural heritage, certain religions is good for America. Gov. Romney knows better about his political party now that he was unfairly ousted too early. The Media has been less careful (except countdown's Keith Olbermein) to point out that this issue is nothing more than just an expression of bigotry...I will say mixed with racism towards frontrunner Obama.

The media is wasting our time over the mention of the middle name "Hussein" which has nothing to do with most Americans' heritage they got from their ethnic and racial origins and the reality of what these persons who carry those names represent. Since when Paul Tsongas or Michael Dukakis, George Bush are names to be more acceptable to Amercans than Mohamed Ali, Barack Hussein Obama, Mel Martinez or even Tiger Woods? This name fear calling is not only an insult to Muslim-Americans who deserve respect for their religion but also a big offense to the Senator from Illinois, his campaing, the country and the people of the United States of America.

Talking about names, the name: Obama is now found in Ireland, in Kenya and even far in Japan (the name of a city in Japan). Is this name different from Alabama, or Iowa, or Alamo, or Ihio which are still names "icons" of the American culture? Now, Obama's Kenyan grandfather was named Barack Hussein Obama. For most Ameicans who do not ( or barely) know the history of Africa, names are given to people based on their casts, their locations, the family they were enslaved to...Just like many African-Americans have inherited names such as "Townsend", "Cunningham" which has nothing to do with the black culture heritage. Is Senator Obama now an "Unfit" to become president because he is the Jr of the Barack H Obama's lineage? What a disgrace to hear this in American politics? Sen. Obama = Born in Hawai, from a mother from Kansas( of Irish descent) anf black immigrant father (originally from Kenya) ought to enjoy the same privileges inherited from Dr King's legacy and fight for civil rights.

What about his Christian Church in Chicago?

What is wrong with this picture, when African-Americans congregate in their churches, when (based on our history and the actuality) we have all-Koreans churches, All-Whites Churches, All-Hispanic Churches??? That argument of Obama's church is not longer standing because his Christian church is as acceptable as the other All-whites church in Alamo or in Alabama.

Sen. Obama is a long time Christain believer of the TUCC, his church on the south side of Chicago for 20 years. It's verifiable, otherwise Hannity and FOX would never had refered to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the church's senior pastor, when Barack Obama launched his campaign in Feb 2007. Also, the young senator from Illinois has made several speeches, including at his church, at the Selma Church, in New Orleans, at the Chrsitian Forum along with Sen Clinton in DC.

HOW CAN A CHRISTIAN MEMBER OF TRINITY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST be a MUSLIM at the same time?

A question none of these pundits, the so called media experts (Begala, Carville, Brazile, Press...) have not been able to answer.

How Can a Christian you refered to in february 2007 be called muslim by the same FOX noise channel? How can Bill Shaheen (Clinton's advisor) and Bill Cunningham (Republican Radio Host/ McCain Cheerleader) can both sing the same song to smear Barack Obama? Will the American People really let this one happen? This is clearly not about who is up or down...This is 2 status-quo fronts ganging up agaisnt CHANGE and the person who chose to represent it and fight along side with the American people for it.

Why Am I saying that? Hillary Clinton's camp had played a big role in leaking a 2006 picture of Sen. obama's visit in Africa to a well resourced-web, the DrudgeReport, and they know what they intended to create in the voters in TX and Ohio...Fear. Asked if Sen. Obama was a Muslim, Sen. Clinton would respond convincingly about.

If all of the above is verifiable but cannot stand to the truth about Barack Obama, than how can these negatives ads (emails) be relevant to the truth? Obama conducts every other session of pledging allegiance in the Senate, in which session you recite the pledge, holding hand to his heart. Why distorting the truth? Obama was sworn in as US senator by V.P. Dick Cheney, by law, on the family Bible they caried with them. Where is the Koran they are talking about? Officials photos can be googled on that, and US Senate "pledge of allegiance" videos can be seen on Utubes.

This is becoming ridiculous when the whole horde of "status quo- old school elements" (Clintons, Repubs Pundits and Politicians, the Press) can play a RACIST and BIGOT card against Senator Barack Obama.

Now, in all this, Al Gore, John Edwards, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson won't say a word to stop these self-destruction ammunitions intended to destroy their own democratic party chances to elect in 2008. I wrote in my ealier blogs about my suspicions, given her actions, about Hillary Clinton when she was, during multiple debates, praising and backing Bush's course in Iraq. Now she backs away from them and calls for a troop withdral in 60 days... From the surge..." is working" to condeming the Iran regime guards... She worked along with the McCain's crowd to craft a protection around the idea against the focus on the right war on terror in Afghanistan.

Protests came from the Kenyan chief-elder who gave the out-fit, as a gift to Obama, and the GOP's leader has not reacted yet. These clothing, symbol of a cultural expression are now portrayed out there as soem form of intronisation of the senator to a Islamist Cult. This is a high ranking member of the US government who travelled to african country who is unfairly carucatured this way. If Senator McCain, Clinton or President Bush wears those clothes...some how they are still americans, more americans than Obama. It;s called Racism. Why? because Obama is Black.

How can McCain be the Republican Party's leader without having a position over his sbires' comments? Is he showing a "life-time" experience hillary clinton has credited him with, while not able to consolidate the conservative base around him? Would he be a president in the WH without his own party's base support? Those are questions Hillary Clinton is raising in the voters' minds but cannot fully answer. Why? Because the Media is not asking tough questions, based on facts and ideas to argue. The rely on sound-bytes they can easly telecast, on xeroxes from the Associated Press (A British Machine) that controls the US news and the world...

So, Obama Supporters, we have got a work to here. Not only we need to launch websites to counterreact to these lies, but we need ultimately to place them on powerful search engines to flood these negatives ads from the Clinton Machine and the Repubs Pundits.

We will prevail, because we still believe in the descency of the American people.

Franklin Katunda

an Obama Surrogate

Hello,Texans For Obama !

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:46:41 EDT

Hello Texans,

It's been a long time. What's up? I was in TX for the Primaries, but just on a short trip (3 days).

Just posting this short note to say that we did good in TX (with a total of more delegates than Hillary Clinton) in primaries + caucuses,

Total delegates for Texas:

99 democrat delegates for Barack Obama (38 in caucus + 61 in primaries)

94 democrat delegates for Hillary (29 in caucus + 65 primaries)

So, send the news out there...With a Wyoming Win and a Missisipi eventual win, PA will be a combination of the Wisconsin and Wyoming kind of voters, which put us on our way to win this nomination with MORE pledged delegates and states.

Be good, Franklin

GO OBAMA 08'

In Preview of the “Texas Tuesday Showdown”

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:51:13 EST

In Preview of the “Texas Tuesday Showdown”

Congoboston/ A&A for Obama Mar. 2nd 2008- Senator Barack Obama now leads in Texas by 4 points, 47 percent to 43 percent for Clinton, up from an Obama 2-point edge on Saturday, writes the Reuters. “Obama's strength in the state's big cities and among men, young voters and blacks has offset her advantage with the state's sizable bloc of Hispanics and older voters”, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Houston Chronicle poll released on Sunday.

What Might Happen in Texas on Tuesday

The Texan Primaries, a particularly confusing and time consuming process will show once again how patriotic the people of Texas will be during these primaries (if the caucus exit results will show a strong turn-out). It also will prove the level of support both Republicans and Democrats enjoy in the great state of Texas. John McCain has a big test here to outshine. In spite of its recent endorsement, a religiously controversial one from the Mega-Televangelist John Hagee, he needs to win by large margin while still being toe-kicked by Mike Hukabee (a popular conservative candidate among Evangelicals and other Southern Baptists).

The McCain’s opposition from Conservatives within the Republican Party, the ill-advised foreign policy of the Bush administration and the McCain “suicidal” stance on the Bush’s Iraq War without a clear Counterterrorism Plan makes voters believe, he will essentially leave our troops in Iraq without detailing and pushing for a clear US plan for Iraqi leaders to reconciliation and the use of active diplomacy with regional allies and enemies of the US… All these things seem to favor Democratic Front-runner Barack Obama who has a strong appeal to white men, wealthy or business oriented voters, some anti-war recent veterans, like always Young voters…Here in Texas they are seen as the best electorate to bring, beyond fanatics, a knowledgeable debate and the civic engagement to the process; Obama will enjoy the vote from African-Americans, which has a clear subgroup in Texas: the recent US-born immigrants’ heirs from Africa and the 1st and 2nd generation of US naturalized citizens who by large numbers live in Houston, Austin and Dallas; the middle-class union workers (unhappy with the job outsourcings and free trades, resulting in wages cuts, unemployment), and the way the current White house and Congress had dealt with the Border Enforcement and Illegal Immigration issues, taken as two distinct but interconnected elements of the issue.)

On the Democratic Side, speaking of the “Obama-Clinton” Showdown, It appears that Obama campaign workers are having an easy task here, when it comes to talk to voters (either by phone or on door-to-door knockings), because the candidate happens to appeal to more of the active constituency in Texas. The 60 years and older electorate, which for the majority usually votes Republican is deeply divided and might, to the contrary to the “Hispanics Factor ”, as the media and the pundits have portrayed, become the deciding vote for the Democrats here in Texas. Why? Because Texan Seniors are concerned by the way the war in Iraq will be conducted, beyond the military surge, under an eventual McCain administration. McCain lack of certain conservatism credentials and its arguably centrist positions on many issues they care deeply, such as Illegal Immigration will make them decide who in the primaries and the general elections to fit better for office.

The other factor that favors Obama over Hillary is that Texan Seniors, for the most I talked to, cannot stand not only a “Clinton back in the White house Again” but unfortunately other deeply gender-oriented minds will say a No to “Hillary Clinton, President”. Now the Texan Primaries allow people to vote on either party on March 4th 2008. A very tough call for voters who are quick to tell us when knocking on doors, they have not made up their mind, yet and there are those who told us they have already voted (Early Vote is Allowed in TX) without giving you the specifics on their choices. This process, as complicated as it seems to be, won’t make it easier for some seniors (an electorate group that had favor Clinton in many other states before) to attend long-lines sessions and deliberation processes at caucuses on that Tuesday Night.

The Clinton Camp, besides having a strong and dedicated female cohort of staffers and energetic activists tied to the democrat apparatus, have not proven they have a better and a consistent handling of the Hispanic voters than Obama; as far as getting them to the polling stations in “large numbers” for caucuses. Particularly in Texas, the majority of either urban or rural voters are not political news “junkies” when it comes to accurately articulating and eventually arguing “publicly” issues of concerns as voters might have done in New Hampshire. I found out that 6 out of 10 voters seem to be not accurately or civically informed on what their government’s business is all about and fanatically pick and choose candidates, keeping the eye off the people’s share in its government’ dealings. I have worked in Manchester, Nashua, and surrounding towns of Auburn, Goffstown and other Candia… and I recalled having one of those long conversations and spirited short debates at voters’ door-steps even with those who engaged with canvassers after they told them ahead they were inclined to vote for an opponent candidate. This is just a scene you can only dream in most parts of the Texas among rural and older constituencies. The Talk is short: “Yes or No, are you going to vote for my guy?”

My Story, Campaigning in Arlington TX, Tarrant-County

My little story and experience, campaigning for Senator Barack obama (D, Illinois) in Tarrant-County, Fort-Worth Area is great; that’s where I am right now writing from my laptop. I flew in from Washington DC, last Friday. What a great thing to know that whatever Senator Obama says out there is not just words… One of his best lines is that “Change happens not from the top down but from the bottom up”. I see it in Dallas area now. I came in this city for about ten times since 1999, and I have worked and closely followed in the 2004 Kerry Campaign. Nothing like this! The excitement goes beyond imagination for the people of Texas. We all know them well for their sense of grandeur (The Lone Star State appears as a country within a country), their pride, fashion style; way of living; their values and culture all are in line, a little bit in favor, with the conservatism movement.

I tell, inspired while writing, this story at 6:45 am on Sunday March 2, 2008, right before my second day tour of weekend-campaigning for Obama at the Forth-Worth Office on Brentwood Stair Road. A great staff have welcomed me there, particularly Leney, an Obama staffer originally from Boston, Massachusetts who immediately signed me up for an ongoing 60 minutes training on the “2 Steps” March 4th Vote-Caucus Day. The training was about learning and informing, as it should be explained, voters we come in contact with. This is a “unique” in the nation way of voting in the primary process; where voters have an early vote and a 2 steps activity on the elections day (voting at the polls from 7am to 7pm and attending the Caucus Session at 7pm and beyond).

The 35 % of the Delegates in the democratic primaries will be awarded by the Texas Democratic Party out of the caucuses results. In the case of the Obama Camp, an Obama Precinct Captain in Texas becomes easily a Caucus Captain; whom at the end of which operation, he or she might wind up to the Convention as a County Delegate or Senate District Convention. All this is based on how many supporters (Caucus Participants) each Democratic Candidate (Obama or Clinton) has gained at their Precinct Caucuses.

I teamed up with Chris and Anna, who happened to be long time activists within the Democratic Party in Arlington TX and will surely play a great role, if they are picked to head out to the Denver Democratic Convention. I got together with them and we canvassed the streets of Arlington TX vicinity. The weather was good, the warmest in TX since the New Year’s Day (a 70-sunny on Saturday and a cloudy-67 Fahrenheit on Sunday) and I witnessed a prompt visit of the latest Texan Democrat Obama Endorser to the Office, Mr. Max Kennedy, son of the late Senator Robert Kennedy just endorsed Obama March 2, and was on his tour around several Obama county offices to encourage Obama staffers. I had a chance to meet with him, shake hands, chat, exchange contacts info and take some pictures along with other Obama Forth-Worth staffers. Mr. Kennedy was delighted to know I am a Boston Resident who made his way to Dallas-Forth Worth for a Weekend to back Obama’s field operation. He said extensively: “Obama is bringing people of all races and walks of life together”… He commented. When learned I graduated from Umass-Boston, as both a scholar in Community Organizing and a Grassroots Activist, rallying the new US citizens, helping immigrants to organize in Boston, He said back to me: “… That’s what my great parents did, when they came to the shores of Boston, they organized, they mobilized and the legacy went on. As you know, the Kennedy benefited from that legacy of putting people together, and that’s how my parents, uncles and many other went on to serving this great country in public service.” After we exchanged emails, business cards, he explained us little bit a scenario when a local activist can win a local seat as city or town council member, a state office’s aspirant.

The encounter of long time Bay State Residents, Max Kennedy, Franklin Katunda of Revere Massachusetts and Kale Kasonga, formerly from Malden Massachusetts was the best thing that reminds local staffers other fellows from the District of Columbia, California and Chicago who came to help the Obama’s Texas Field Organizers how important is the movement that draw all racial backgrounds and breed of activists and community organizers, This, at the end of the day brings endorsements from leaders, fulfilling the idea suggested by the Junior Senator of Illinois (former Community Organizer) that “Change happens from the bottom up, and not from the top down”

Franklin Katunda, On the Campaign Trail in Forth-Worth,Texas

Article Reported on Congoboston.com and the webpage A&A for Obama’s

Blog for Obama Supporters: “Africans And Americans for Obama”

Campaigning for Obama in Dallas,TX: Sat-Sun-Mon, March 1st -3rd

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:38:26 EST

Dear Friends,

In preparation of the March 4th elections in TX, VT, RI and OH, I have signed up to attend the GOTV action in Dallas, TX and will report to the East- Fort Worth Office this Saturday morning. Off course, they will tell me if i will do canvassing or telephone banking...

Here is the story about going to Texas: Back in April of 2007, I hosted an event for Obama in Arlington TX at my cousin's place. I flew in from Boston Massachusetts where I reside. We gathered about 30 names of supporters online on barackobama website, and we watched a video simulcast of Senator Obama, speaking live from IOWA. Than a discussion took place on Why are we supporting Obama? How are going to affect people around us for him...Mobilize, Get-out-the-vote (GOTV) and encourage young people to go to the polls.

Back then, I had some statistics from the campaign website that suggested that the Obama Camp in TX was very so small that we could not envisione how fast it will be growing in order to win: A dozen of groups had less than 150 members, and today they boast more than 1000 for some of them.

Dallas for Obama had 142 members;

Texas for Obama (164)

Univ of TX & Alumni for Obama (89);

Obama-Dallas (135);

Texas Students for Obama (22) and

Texas State Univ. -Barack Obama (22)...

For example one of the groups today has increased its membership to become a political action group and true ground-work power: For example : The Obama-Tarrant County,TX (91) and now has about 497 members. That's how small was the grassroots map for Obama a year ago from now.

Remember, no matter the smears, negative caricatures, racist comments and attempts to diminish senator Obama and even lies from these "Un-Americans" opponents, tell them that this campaign is a true movement; and it's not about Obama's name, Mine nor Your self, it's about the American people and the voices that were silenced and ignored for too long.

Back in April 2007, states like North Dakota, Nebraska and many others could not cross our mind; as places we could win for Obama given their constituencies we did not know the response to the message at the polls. Here some numbers of net-groups we had for Obama in these states back than:

North Dakota had NO online groups for Obama (We won it);

South Dakota had 1 group only;

Nebraska (a state Barack Won) had 3 groups;

Utah had less than 6 groups (We did good caucusing there...).

These are places we won in january 2008... How, by working on ht eground from the bottom up.

So, don't let today's cynics and radio talks "tyrants" turn you off, because WE CAN and will win this election. We are a movement that will organize the american people beyond November 08'. if some of you want to join me and Get-Out-The-Vote in Texas, please feel free to do so. I got some of those stories from my past canvassing and phone banking in New Hamphire, Massachusetts that will get you fired up !!!

Don't wait too long, if you are in the area, please email me back so we can arrange meeting: Franklinkatunda@yahoo.com.

I'm returning to work in DC on Monday 3rd in the afternoon. I know we can win TEXAS for OBAMA!

YES WE CAN,

OBAMA Win overseas reflects How America is Seen by the World

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:06:18 EST

OBAMA Win overseas reflects How America is Seen by the World

My argument is based on the fact that many Americans who live aboad are an unspotted constituency to the eyes of Americans who live in the mainland, while they are important to the debate. They are including independents contractors, business professionals; also retailers, military and non-profit workers; many students, embassy personnel and international organizations staff.

They represent the core of a rich consituency which is knowlegeable on many foreign policy issues not only because of their life experience abroad and mostly because of the demographics that make them a strong voice from a highly-educated constituency of Americans ever. From London to Malaysia, from the DR Congo to the Australian capital, they know more and understand clearly the world's issues and challenges better than Americans in a back rural area of Iowa; they can voice better for the change in our foreign policies we need better than a good fellow American from suburban New Jersey.

Talking about our foreign policy and the place America has lost in the world, "Americans Abroad" are on top of knowledge on domestic issues and challenges but more they are well informed by their experiences while living in foreign countries. They are succeeding in today's world where they live; they compete and where they apply rules of diplomacy in their everyday life.

From globalization to climate change, from the genocide in Darfur issue to the definition of torture; US Abroad understand what the War in Iraq have created in the overall view of the world on America, and the damage in reputation Americans are coping with abroad.

Today, the massive vote by Democrats ( far above the ones from Republicans) from the world's countries and the fact that many of them (65%) voted for Obama in large numbers (read below), reflects that this is happening because the opinion which recognizes that Senator Barack Obama articulates a better policy they agree with; reason why I am happy to share this article with you and to make sure we emphasize on it. Remember the Media and the pundits in USA (like always) did not articulate on that with in-depth analyses as they should. We know that CNN is best equipped to have live-coverage from US voters in the world and the most talented correspondents it has in those countries, but did not do well on covering them.

+++

Here a piece from the UPI online:

WASHINGTON, Feb. 21 (UPI) -- Democrats Abroad declared that Sen. Barack Obama won the Global Primary elections that were hosted by the organization.

Obama, D-Ill., won 65 percent of the vote, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., won 32 percent and the other candidates each pulled less than 1 percent of the vote during the Feb. 5-12 voting period, a release said.

The results of the vote reportedly determine the distribution of 4.5 delegate votes for the Democratic National Convention. Obama won 2.5 delegate votes and Clinton won two.

It is reported that the Democrats Abroad Global Convention in April will be where a remaining 2.5 votes will be decided.

Democrats Abroad has four superdelegate votes and a total of 22 delegates who will each get half a vote at the convention, the release said.

The Democrats Abroad Global Primary reportedly opened the highest number of voting centers in its history this year. This was the first primary election in which voters living in countries without centers to vote, could partake by Internet, fax or mail, the report said.

UPI

OBAMA ECONOMIC PLAN in Janesville, Wisconsin

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:08:01 EST

Here a condensed of the Economic plan laid out by Senator Barack Obama. Please print and use it for TALKING POINTS with the public. At bottom, find an ACROBAT Reader version (printable). This helps to shut McCain and Clinton on what they have been saying.

Read ...

· Protecting Homeowners: Obama has proposed a fund to offer direct relief to victims of mortgage fraud and would ease the burden on struggling homeowners by offering a tax credit to low- and middle-income Americans that would cover ten percent of their mortgage interest payment every year.

· Combating Fraud: Obama would institute tough new penalties for those who commit mortgage fraud, and create a uniform HOME SCORE that would allow consumers to compare various mortgage products so that they can determine which mortgage best fits their needs and financial situation.

· Middle-Class Tax Cut – Obama is the only candidate to propose a middle-class tax cut that will provide relief to 95% of working Americans -- $1,000 per working family. He’ll also eliminate income taxes for any senior making less than $50,000.

· Affordable Health Care – Obama’s universal health care plan cuts costs more than any other plan in this race – it will save the typical family up to $2500 on their premiums.

· Making College Affordable – Obama will provide the middle class a fully refundable tax credit worth $4,000 for tuition and fees every year, which would cover two-thirds of the tuition at the average public college or university.

· Easing the Burden on Working Families – For mothers and fathers who are juggling work and parenting, Obama will expand the child care tax credit for people earning less than $50,000 a year, and he’ll double spending on quality afterschool programs. He will also expand the Family Medical Leave Act to include more businesses and millions more workers; and change a system that’s stacked against working parents by requiring every employer to provide seven paid sick days a year, so that they can be home with their child if they are sick.

· A Secure Retirement – Obama will require employers to enroll every worker in a direct deposit retirement account that places a small percentage of each paycheck into savings. Workers would be able to retain this account even if they change jobs, and the federal government will match the savings for working families.

· A Credit Card Bill of Rights – Obama will institute a five-star rating system to inform consumers about the level of risk involved in every credit card and establish a Credit Card Bill of Rights that will ban unilateral changes to a credit card agreement; ban rate changes to debt that’s already incurred; and ban interest on fees.

· Reforming Bankruptcy Laws – Obama will reform bankruptcy laws to make sure that those who can demonstrate they went bankrupt because of medical expenses can relieve their debt and get back on their feet.

· Rebuilding our Infrastructure – Obama would create a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years. This investment generate nearly two million new jobs – many of them in the construction industry that’s been hard hit by this housing crisis.

· Trade that Works for Workers – Obama will end tax breaks for companies who ship jobs overseas and give breaks to companies who create good jobs with decent wages here in America.

· Millions of New Green Jobs -- Obama’s energy plan will invest $150 billion over ten years to establish a green energy sector that will create millions of new jobs over the next two decades – jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced. He will also provide funding to help manufacturers convert to green technology and help workers learn the skills they need for these jobs.

Senator Obama’s comprehensive agenda to restore fairness and balance to the economy and restore our prosperity can be viewed in full HERE.

Go Obama 08'

Franklin Katunda

Sign a MOVEON.Org Petition on Dem. Superdelegates

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:39:22 EST

Dear Obama Supporters,

I just signed MoveOn.org Political Action's petition stating :

"The Democratic Party must be democratic. The superdelegates should let the voters decide between Clinton and Obama, then support the people's choice."

Click here to learn more and sign:

http://pol.moveon.org/superdelegates/?r_by=12133-8465831-P92WOf&rc=comment_forward

Please copy/paste this text on email to many of your friends to SAVE democracy and the will of the American People, engaged in this movement for Change.

Thanks,

franklin

SOUTH CAROLINA FOR OBAMA

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:49:25 EST

Wow, with this landslide, unexpected for the Clintons’ and far heavy Obama’s VICTORY in South Carolina, there a few things to mention; America has set the tone to the Status Quo, again. Iowa has been repeated again in South Carolina, the North and Mid-West and the South are all part of the American Awakening:

o Obama wins 68% of 18-29 year old Americans

o Obama wins 62% of 30-44 year old Americans

o Obama wins 55% of 45-59 year old Americans

o Obama wins 63% of people who have never voted before

o Obama wins 54% of non-college educated voters

o Obama wins 52% of college educated voters

o Obama wins 55% of people who make less than $100,000

o Obama wins 57% of people who make less than $50,000

o Obama wins 52% of people who said the economy was the most important issue

Senator Barack Obama (D. Illinois) is winning also delegates (24 for South Carolina), enough to have the cynics among the African American so-called “Leaders” to shut-up! Super Tuesday is now offering more chances to unite this country again and end once for all the politics of fear, negative ads and distraction.We have delegates (and super delegates) in a few more states, and we are out for grabbing more: Check the link below: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D Go OBAMA 08’

Letter to OBAMA Website's Wemaster (Primaries Calendar on website)

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:51:38 EST

This is a copy a letter I sent today to the Webmaster for BarackObama.com regarding the calendar for the primaries and the number of delegates for each one of them.

See a synopsis I published on our private group's blog. See, this is important as we approach Super Tuesday (22 states) with 27 other states remaining to win after Feb. 5th.

So, if you feel the same way, please send copy of similar letter to the office Chicago-HDQ, by either mailing them or calling them.

Thank you

Frankin

=====================>>>>>>>>>

Please Read>>>>

Dear Obama For America Team,

I'm an Obama supporter and campaign worker, and would like to get your attention to a few points to include in the website mainpage when webmastering the barackobama.com. As time is going by, (after Nevada caucus) I felt the need to publish on the main page the official CALENDAR of all Democratic State Primaries (Dates and Time for the Vote and the Number of "Delegates to DNC" for grabs in every state).

This action will help our supporters in different states to set their clocks, especially first time voters who don't often keep track on these important dates and time for caucus and polling. Also, this action can be done by text-messaging supporters cellphones with the same info in their state. This will help supporters from states like California to know they have a max-amount of delegates to the next DNC; and by informing them, we will better get them FIRED UP, knowing what is at stakes in their neighborhood and rally more for Obama.

Don't you agree with me? If any question, please call me at 781-706-8919 Best Regards

Franklin Katunda Obama for American 08'

campaign workerNashua and Manchester

NHMa-2-NH Team for OnamaOnline Group/Blog Coordinator

"African And Americans For Obama"

List of Obama's Endorsements from Officials, Celebrities and Media...

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:24:04 EST

Barack Obama For President’s Endorsements

As of January 17, 2008

Public and Elected Officials

1. Thomas Daschle, Fmr. Dem. House Majority Leader

2. Adrien Fenty, Mayor of Washington DC

3. Rod Blagojevich, Illinois Governor

4. Dick Durbin, US Senator of Illinois

5. Richard Daley, Mayor of Chicago

6. Ted Sorenson, JFK Advisor/ Speech Writer

7. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Fmr. Pres. Carter’s NSA

8. Tim Keane, Governor of Virginia

9. Phil Leventis, SC State Senator

11.Kay Patterson, SC State Senator

12.Arthur Davis, Alabama US Congressman

13.Bill Beck, Mayor of Durham, NC

14.Frank Cownie, Mayor of Des Moines, IA

15.Harris Woffard, Fmr. PA Senator

16.Glenn Reese, SC State Senator

17.Carol Shea-Porter, US Congresswoman NH

18.Barbara Lee, California Representative

19.Betty MacCollum, NM Congressman

20.Dave Loebsack, IA Congressman

21.Jim Hodges, Fmr Governor of South Carolina

22.Douglas Wilder, Mayor of Richmond VA

23.Paul Hodes, US Representative of NH

24.Steve Rothman, Representative of New Jersey

25.Gwen Moore, Representative of Wisconsin

26.Willie Hines, Chairmain/ Council of State-Wisconsin

27.Jim Doyle, Governor of Illinois

28.Cory Booker, Mayor of Newark, NJ

29.Jeremiah Healy, Mayor of Jesrey City, NJ

30.Ned Lamont, US Senator, Connecticut

(Fmr candidate Chris Dodd’s aide)

31.Dave Bieter, Mayor of Boise, Idaho

32.Mike Burket, Idaho Rep.

33.Edgar Malepeai, Idaho Rep.

34.Nicole Lefavour, Idaho Rep.

35.Les Bock, Idaho Rep.

36. James Ruchti, Idaho Rep.

36.Wendy Jacquet, Idaho House Minority Leader

37.Gary Hart, Colorado Senator ( Twice Pres. Candidate)

38.Ethel Kennedy, Senator Bob Kennedy’s Widow

39.Jesse Jackson Jr. Rep. Illinois

40.Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. -Civil Rights Leader, Rainbow Coalition

41.Bobby Rush, Illinois State Rep.

42.Emil Jones, Illinois State Rep.

43.Michael Fitzgerald, IA State Treasurer

44.Tom Miller, Iowa Attorney General

45.Tim Johnson, South Dakota Senator

46.Bill Perkins, NY State Senator

50. Ben Nelson, Nevada Senator

51. Janet Napolitano, Governor of Arizona

(seen as potential VP in any Dem. Admin.)

52. Bill Bradley, US Senator, NJ

53. Hank Johnson, Georgia Congressman

54. Jim Doyle, Governor of Wisconsin

55. Patrick Murphy, PA Congressman

56. John Kerry, Mass US Senator, 2004 Pres. Candidate

57. Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts

58. Shirley Franklin, Mayor of Atlanta

59. Kasim Reed, Georgia State Senator

60. Claire McCaskill, US Senator from Missouri

61. John Conyers, US Congressman, D Michigan

62. Patrick Leahy, US Senator, D Vermont

63. Tony Knowles, Fmr Governor of Alaska

Celebrities, Public Figures

1. Andrew Sullivan, Commentator

2. Oprah Winfrey, TV Show

3. George Clooney, Actor

4. Will Smith, Actor

5. Halle Berry

6. Scarlett Johanson

7. Zach Brafff

8. Chris Rock, Comedian/Actor

9. Usher, musician

10. Larry David

11. Cornel West, Professor Princeton Univ.

12. Kal Penn

13. James Whitmore

14. Ken Burns, NH Filmaker

15. Hill harper, CSI’s tv series Actor

Civil Rights / Religious and Community Leaders

1. Rev. Joseph Lowery, Civil Rights Leader

2. Dr. C T Vivian, Civil rights Leader

3. Dr. Michael Battle, interdominational Theol. Sem.

4. Rev. Dr. Lawrence Carter Sr, MLK Int’l Chapel, Morehouse college

5. Rev. Gerarld Durley, Progressive Baptist Church

6. Dr. Robert Franklin Jr, Emory Univ.

7. Rev. Dr. Cynthia Hale, Ray of Hope C. Church

8. Rev. Dr. Mathew Johnson, Christ. Fellowship Bapt. C.

9. Rev. Lester McCorn, Faith AME Zion Church

10. Rev. George Moore, St Philip AME Church

11. Rev. Anthony Motley, Lindsay Street Bapt. C.

12. Rev. Keneth Samuels, Victory Bapt. Church

13. Rev. E Dewey Smith Jr, Greater travelers Rest. BC

14. Dr. T. Dewitt Smith Jr, Progressive Ntl Bapt. Conv.

Newspapers and Workers Unions

1. MinesotaBrown, Newspaper

2. Portsmouth Herald, NH

3. Boston Globe, Mass

4. Marshalltown-Republican Newspaper, Des Moines

5. Nevada Culinary Union ( 30,000 local affiliates)

6. Nevada SEIU; part of 450,000 nationwide members coalition of unions called “Unite-Here”

7. Las Vegas- Review Journal (Nevada’s largest paper)

8. Nashua Telegraph, NH

9. Valley News, NH

CALENDER OF DEMOCRATIC STATES PRIMARIES 2008

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:16:58 EST

CALENDER OF DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES 2008

Here a list of states’ primaries and the number of delegates they will deliver to the next DNC’s meeting.

January 2008

Jan. 4th Iowa (57 delegates)

Jan. 8th New Hampshire (30 delegates)

Jan. 19th Nevada (33 delegates)

Jan. 29th South Carolina (54 delegates)

February 2008

Feb. 5th: Super Tuesday (22 states and out of US voters)

Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut,

Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Massachusetts, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico,

North Dakota, Utah Minnesota, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Tennessee

and all the Democrats Abroad in all countries (all 2,075 delegates)

Feb. 9th Louisiana, Nebraska, Washington St, Virgin Isl. (205)

Feb. 10th Maine (38 delegates)

Feb. 12th Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland (240 del.)

Feb. 19th Hawaii, Wisconsin (121 delegates)

March 2008

Mar. 4th Ohio, Texas, Vermont, Rhodes Island (444 del.)

Mar. 8th Wyoming (18 delegates)

Mar. 10th Samoa (09 delegates)

Mar. 11th Mississippi (40 delegates)

April 2008

Apr 22nd Pennsylvania (188 delegates)

May 2008

May 3rd Territory of Guam (09 delegates)

May 6th Indiana, North Carolina (219 delegates)

May 13th West Virginia (39 delegates)

May 20th Kentucky, Oregon (124 delegates)

June 2008

Jun. 3rd Montana, South Dakota (47 delegates)

Jun. 7th Puerto Rico (56 delegates)

Sources: The Washington Post

What if America Is Right and Black Leaders Are Wrong?

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:24:42 EST

What if America Is Right and Black Leaders Are Wrong?

Here what I have to say about the black leaders as to their involvement in the 2008 elections. I wrote a few months ago that these people are NOT leaders at all and are trying to pay back to the Clintons for all they have been doing for them during the era of reign. If they want to push that logic of electability far, they should then consider their own conscience when criticizing Senator Barack Obama. They are a disgrace to the entire African American Community, and surely WON’T say a word after controversial comments from the Clintons on Sen. Obama’s message and the MLK legacy…

They will be judged for NOT responding to Bill and Hillary Clinton and further they will be confused by the vote the American People will deliver on the coming up elections day. They will be proven wrong on January 26th (South Carolina Primary) when the Millions of Americans (all racial backgrounds) will express their choice of the nominee for the Democratic Party.

Ambassador Young Andrew (… during the Clinton Administration), Al Sharpton and their friends alike seem to never be these “true” Civil Rights Activists, but rather they appear to be “Agents” of the Powerful in order to distract Poor America, made of all minority colors. They even went far to coronate Bill as the first African American President… Well, the truth is the real man for the job has come and America testified to them this truth (In Iowa and New Hampshire primaries) that a 46 year old African-American US Senator from Illinois will be that FIRST African-American president.

I like much these so called black "leaders" for what they have done positively in the past for the American People and for raising debates on real issues that undermine the black America, but I say they are not being real this time when it comes to the 2008 race. I'm ceratin that it is not easy for many Americans (regular citizens) to realize that some of these black "leaders" have got into an “obscure” agenda in the backstage of the 2008 campaign (with the help of the media and some push groups) to distract the American people all along 2007.

How come? By intentionally raising stories of hate-related issues in America; racial slurs, N-words bans and other themes that existed for decades in our country to distract and profile. From the “Don Imus” Affair to illegal dog-fighting by sports or hollywood stars; the use of enhancers in sports by some black athletes… Or simply the sexist comments "advertised" by Al Sharpton to have Hillary Clinton gain political points over the Rutgers players. This agenda, which went at its highest level of purpose with the "hanging of nooses"; an issue that is "as old as the consitution of the US", had the primary and obscure role to ressuscitate racial divisions in the minds of the Americans who are coming together behind Barack Obama's candidacy, and to reinforce by all means, some "subliminal" fuel of segregation that still exist in some people’s behaviors and motives.

Why all these old and known stories being brought back to our memories (using puch groups, the media, and these black leaders) in 2007, when one African-American candidate is running a positive and “all-inclusive” campaign? Who does it benefit, if we can't bring together the American people (all races, democrats, independents and republicans) around our common goals? Democrats or Republicans? Washington DC Insiders or Outsiders?

We will put the black leaders (agents for the powerful) to test until the SC primaries to see if they will protest to Bill’o and Hillary for those “fairytale” comments, or if they will call to a stop to these denigrating comments against Obama, like Congressman Jim Clyburn has courageously done to stop the Clintons’ negative ads.

Dr. ML King left a legacy, what are we going to do with it. WHERE ARE WE GOING FROM HERE? I found out that more other racial creeds of Americans (Jews, Asians, Whites and Latinos…) greatly believe the MLK legacy than do these so called black leaders (I'm black my self...) But, why Am I saying that? Because I know it down my guts....Listen, I worked in the Obama Camp in NH (Nashua and Manchester) where about 70% of our whole army of staff and volunteers were NOT African-Americans… Is it to say that everyone else in America is ready for a black president but the African American “leaders”? You bet, that is the right answer.

Black leaders are getting nervous and personal against Obama while Governors, Mayors, Congressmen, and Senators (black and whites), like higher-ranked John Kerry [2004 prez candidate] are endorsing him. So, it's not about these leaders, but the American people.

People, America is Ready, some Black "leaders" just aren't.

(See attached below a list of a few endorsements to Senator Obama i personnally recorded (it will be updated every week on my blog's page)

Now, People of South Carolina, you are facing a very “hard” test in the history of our country. Which is, go beyond your fears and notions of inferiority. Start believing in yourself, and see beyond Iowa and NH where the tone was set, that your state has now that important role factor in determining the nominee for the 2008 democratic ticket. If you fail to critically think and rethink about your vote (as Oprah Winfrey suggested to 30,000 of you in Columbia, SC) you will than let these so called black leaders pick the nominee for you ... Because chances like these happen once in a lifetime, in a generation. What are you going to do to Martin Luther King Jr's legacy?

As for me, I say that these so called Black "Leaders" are not viable and not worthy of any consideration: Don't get me wrong, many decent black leaders are not concerned here. I'am talking about people like Charles Rangel (D,NY), Robert Johnson (BET Founder), Ambassador Andrew Young (D) who went out of the way and have denigrated Sen. Barack Obama, calling his remarks STUPID (C. Rangel); suggesting his past drug use as a TEENAGER as a disqualifier to be picked by African-Americans versus experienced Clinton ( BET founder Bob Johnson); and by alledging that Senator Obama is not only inexperienced, but he is too young in age to run for the White House (Andrew Young). Wow...And they call themselves african-american "leaders" !!! What a disgrace to the American People!

Well, History will judge and future will tell; few days before the Nevada and SC primaries, we are still standing up for Change, and by a one-more-victory, we will prove these black leaders and their patrons wrong. We will take our government back, and sweep Washington DC of all its pestilent lobbyist netroots by carrying in an "outsider" leader and a "novice" beltway politician, sen. Barack Obama in the White House ( YES, WE CAN !!!)

America, our moment is NOW!

Today is January 13th 2008,
I am Franklin
Go Obama 08'

Today, Saturday Jan 5th ABC Debate in NH

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:54:41 EST

Ready, Set, New Hampshire Debate

7:00 - 8:30 for Republicans

And 8:45 - 10:15pm for Democrats!

On Saturday, January 5, 2008 -- only two days after the critical Iowa caucuses and three days before the first in the nation New Hampshire primary -- ABC News, Facebook, and ABC affiliate WMUR will team up for a historic debate night.

Republican and Democratic contenders for the White House will meet on stage in two separate events, both in primetime, and presented by ABC News.

The participants for the Republican debate will be as follows:

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, R-NYC
Former Governor Mike Huckabee, R-Ark.
Senator John McCain, R-Ariz.
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Tex.
Former Governor Mitt Romney, R-Mass.
Former Senator Fred Thompson, R-Tenn.

The participants for the Democratic debate will be as follows:

Senator Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.
Former Senator John Edwards, D-N.C.
Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill.
Governor Bill Richardson, D-N.M.

"World News" anchor Charlie Gibson moderates the Republican contest first from Saint Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire, from 7:00-8:30pm ET. The Democrats take the stage second, from approximately 8:45-10:15pm ET.

Surrounding each debate, "Good Morning America" host Diane Sawyer will anchor live reports, providing a re-cap and analysis of the evening's events. She will be joined by "This Week" anchor George Stephanopoulos. Bianna Golodryga will report from the ABC News/Facebook desk.

To participate in the debate, all candidates needed to meet one of three criteria:

1) Place first, second, third or fourth in the Iowa Caucuses

2) Poll 5% or higher in one of the last four reputable random sample New Hampshire telephone surveys sponsored by an established news organization and conducted and released on or before January 4, 2008.

3) Poll 5% or higher in one of the last four reputable random sample national telephone surveys sponsored by an established news organization and conducted and released on or before January 4, 2008.

IOWA FOR OBAMA, NOW A REALITY

Franklin Katunda — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:38:28 EST

Greetings Friends,

The presidential race kicked off tonight, and Obama convincingly won! So we now know, OBAMA CAN WIN. Check out the numbers for Democrats in NH:

1. Barack Obama 39%

2. John Edwards 30%

3. Hillary Clinton 29%

4. Bill Richardson 2%

Now is your chance to get involved, the New Hampshire primary is Tuesday, the Massachusetts shortly after that, and we got the momentum. Franklin Katunda (my political partner & fellow community organizer) and I have officially supported Obama since May of last year, and we look forward to you joining the team.

We are working with MA organizers, DC organizers, NH, Virginia, Texas and more… You can volunteer today - make signs, canvass, make phone calls, hold house parties, whatever you like – we have all sorts of ways to for you to lend a hand.

Please contact me at bradstoler@comcast.net or 508-641-9089 or Franklin at franklinkatunda@yahoo.com or (781) 706-8919 to learn how you can you can GET INVOVLED!

God Bless America,

Brad

Has Des Moines Register Wasted its 2008 Endorsement?

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:05:37 EST

Has Des Moines Register Wasted its 2008 Endorsement?

It may be hard to tell right now if the newspaper did indeed lose its point, but all we knowis that the largest Hawkeye Newspaper; famous because of its known and revered journalists, such as David Ypsen, has also drawn harsh critics while publishing 2 weeks before the caucus an editorial, endorsing two political candidates, with two opposed directions to be the candidate of their respective parties.

Was the Newspaper trying to play nice to DC's Inseders?

Their endorsement not only confused many other newsmakers but most importantly iowa voters for the simple fact that these endorsed candidates cannot represent the views the base of these 2 parties( democrats and republicans) express. By endorseeing Hillary Clinton and John MCCain, thye Newspaper had alienated the independent voters when they were expected to be balanced or neutral in covering candidates' stances and validate their credentials. When it comes to the direction which this country should take, Journailsts should be the least to be involved in candidates' endorsement. This sounds very much like the "Hanity&Colmes Show", so called right-left balanced. The Fox-News Show is actually funded by a right-leaning press company.

No need to remind that Fox News, their host TV network, was the most poorly rated in terms of debate coverage in the 2008 presidential debates. Their failures are also due to the fact that they could not reach out to the Democrats Candidates to get them on any Fox-News-sponsored debate. Partly because how can you moderate a debate with candidates like Barack Obama, John Edwards or Hillary Clinton whom your TV channel has spent more time weighing insults against rather than covering the facts?

Allegations like: " Senator Barack Obama was a Madrassa student in Indonesia…" Or marketing TV and video ads that attacked former Sen. Edwards has the most expensive hair cut or Hillary Clinton’s private personality versus her qualifications to be a woman president. All these negative ads should never have come from a news company (like Fox Noise)...Only in America!

About 2 weeks after the board of the Des Moines Register had endorsed Hillary Clinton, (whom voted for the war and never apologized for), the largest newspaper organization in the U S primary process clearly sent a bizarre signal to voters in terms of which direction the base should take in their choice, when on the Republican side it supports John McCain (whom voted for the war in Iraq and have no reason to apologize for it and still preaching for a military surge).

Now, the same Des Moines Register has been proved wrong by Iowans understanding the realities of what America needs: a brand new January 1st 2008 polls shows now: “Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has widened his lead in Iowa over Hillary Clinton and John Edwards heading into Thursday's nominating caucuses, according to The Des Moines Register's final Iowa Poll before the 2008 nominating contests.”

May Be the People of Iowa will VOTE different from what Des Moines Register Wants...

Now this could have been predictable to the newspaper's editorial board to see an Obama’s rise was so predictable when its Poll's team wrote on January issue: “dramatic influx of first-time caucus goers, including a sizable bloc of political independents. Both groups prefer the Illinois senator in what has been a very competitive campaign.”

Senator Barack Obama went up to 32%Senator Hillary Clinton levels to 25%Fmr Sen. John Edwards has no changed at 24% The findings so far, mark the largest lead of any of the Democratic candidates in the Register's poll all year, underscoring what has been a hard-fought battle among the three well-organized Iowa frontrunners, wrote the Des Moines Register. It is to mention also that this telephone survey has been polled out of 800 likely Democratic caucus goers was taken Dec. 27-30. And like most Americans know, this is a period when Senator Barack Obama suffered some attacks from exterior groups and unions supporting Clinton and Edwards.

These latest Polls, the last ones before IOWA caucus day also prove that endorsements from Unions, Newspapers or Officials and Negatives Ads cannot help candidates to win an election before a sound mind people. The ads were prepared to send out in the air, some lies against Barack’s healthcare plan and his ethics, not taking money from lobbyists, on his ability to take on special interests. But, clearly, these tactics don’t work anymore in America.

Now what does this tell us? These latest polls two days before the Thursday Caucus Day are, wrote the same paper are: “…An indication of the Obama's appeal in Iowa, Democratic caucusgoers say they prefer change and unity over other leadership characteristics."

So, Obama Supporters, lets get out there and caucus for Obama in Jan 3rd (Iowa) and vote on Jan. 8th (New Hampshire)

Franklin Katunda,

Obama for America 08'

Online Group Coordinator

Last Week Canvassing in NH

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:51:44 EST

I just returned from a bus trip that tool us today (dec 29) from Boston, Massachusetts to Nashua, NH. I just got home now aound 730pm and i'am excited about it.

I tell ypu what? the Obama momentum is building rapidly, as many voters are making up their mind. Still, we had to be patient with those who want their right to choice be respected, which is they don't "disclose" their position until the caucus day (January 8th)but tell you they are LEANING towards Barack Obama.

We had a lot of good feedbacks about Barack...People who really believe he is the "needed" candidate fot change now.

If you live in Mass, NH or VT...you can still get involved by signing up on the webpage: nhdotbarackobama.com. I personnally will be back in Manhester NH (the 7th and 8th) for the caucus.

I still have a room for an overnite stay at my friend in Manchester NH, if anyone wish to come. You can email me (through my blog). Simply click my name on the title and leave me with your email-contact.

FIRED UP, READY TO GO!

Franklin

Obama Plan Realistic, says the NH's Union Leader.

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:38:57 EST

Dear Friend,

After Hillary unsuccessfully attacked the Obama proposal for Healthcare and even when john Edwards presented his, the NH Union Leader (the largerst NH New paper) thinks Senator Barack Obama Plan is more realistic, balanced, which gives it more leverage in the next presidency, as far as the Congress Legisklative process.

The plan won't be called Hillary's socialized healthcare, but won't leave citizens unprotected, while not mandating its tenure. However, his plan ensures coverage for children.

Please read the following: http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Obama's+health+care%3A+A+smaller+pill+to+swallow&articleId=fd9098a3-458d-44b2-9bf2-8b33b62f50ef

MA-2-NH team

Franklin Katunda,

Campaign Worker

FROM THE BOSTON COUNTDOWN FOR CHANGE....

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:15:23 EST

It's not over yet...Endorsements are still pouring!!! I am glad DesMoines Mayor Cownie will play a big role in streinghtening the 30 days countdown to change in Iowa caucus.

Dear Friends, I just came back from the Boston "Countdown to Change" Event where I was invited to be on stage with Barack, sort of a "cheering person" on the stage's background. Senator Obama got public endorsements from 3 Boston's city councilors: Mr Sam Yoon, Mr Flaherty and Mr Ross. The event got a big turnout as Bostonians ruched in that Park Plaza Castle under 20 degrees F. and little bit of snow outside.

It was a successful recruting time for more volunteers as many registered to attend several "door-to-door" trips to NH every other weekend until the JANUARY 8th NH Election Day. Boston's city officials are known to be champions of the concept of grassroots canvassing "door2door" from their last city's race, and they understand and salute the kind of politics Barack Obama will bring in Washington DC.

I had personnally backed in 2005, Boston City Councilor Sam Yoon,(a friend of mine) who happened to be the first ASIAN-AMERICAN city councilor in the history of Boston. Not to mention Massachusetts Gov., the honorable Deval Patrick, who endorsed Obama already and headed along with us last Nov 10th to "Nashua canvassing for Obama". We are on the right track to get Obama ahead of the NH polls, just like he twice proved his lead in IOWA.

GO OBAMA...Barack Rocks Boston !!!

From Where Will Come the "Swift Boating" in 08' Elections?

Franklin Katunda — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:24:45 EST

In stead of tackling the right issue, which was to ending the war in Iraq, the Aemrican electorate got distracted and lured into the "swift boating" slur which caused the democratic candidate John Kerry to loose the race.

The 2004 controversial attacks, negative and without any substance as they were, are not far from what we can expect or anticipate in 2008 elections. Though the American people is tired and now lacks trust in Washington DC insiders they still fascinated by the sensational and reveal to be less educated on issues of America.

At the Obama Campaign, we ought to be swift in dealing with and very methodical in responding to any attacks from other candidates (democrats or republicans), insiders or outsiders. Just because we are for the politics of Hope doesn't mean we should back down to deloyal attacks and let them go unresponded to or challenged.

Make no mistake, we need to confront them with facts about their own baggages and tangible arguments that stop these old, "dirty" opponents from spreading their negative and unecessary acts of provocation to the detriment of ther real debate our campaign offers to the american people. Front runners in National polls on both sides are to be scrutinized carefully.

Figures to watch from now until the Primaries Caucuses are

(1) Hillary Clinton,

(2) Bill Clinton,

(3) The right-wing pundits,

(4) Conservative Candidates and their Media ( e.g Fox News)

(5) The "pro-Clinton" Anchors (e.g. Keith olberman, Wolf Blitzer)

GO OBAMA....We are on the right track to win. Lets strategize and win wisely!

-- By Franklin Katunda

Gov. Patrick Joined us in Nashua NH

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:29:18 EST

Congoboston.com-- Last November 10th, 2007, three school buses loaded with Obama supporters left a parking lot at the 99 Restaurant, across from Bunker Hill Community College in Charlestown, Mass to the primary voter’s state of New Hampshire. In response to a call from Deval Patrick, the “historically” first African American Governor of the state of Massachusetts, more than a hundred of supporters signed up and showed up, while enduring some 25 degrees morning weather for a bus field trip to three New Hampshire’s towns.

Among many supporters were former Deval’s campaign staff during his 2006 bid for the Beacon Hill, a few Obama-leaning political activists; also came along the “Obama-MA-2-NH” Campaign staff led by Nicole Derse. In total, 500 Obama Canvassers all teamed up for this Rendez-vous in knocking on voters’ doors in NH’s neighborhoods. In facts, last October 22nd at the Boston Common, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick publicly endorsed Sen. Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in the race to the White House.

Our own, Franklin Katunda, Congoboston.com’s chief editor participated in the Boston Rally and the Electoral Canvassing, as both the Editor of the most active Boston’s Community News Network for Congolese-Americans and Residents, and most as Campaign Worker. He registered with “Obama For America 08” to support the candidacy of the Illinois Senator to the White House. Using the very same Congoboston’s expertise he has developed as Community Organizer with the use of ( an affordable yet popular technology) - the Internet, Franklin Katunda launched (February 2007) an online network that courted supporters for Barack Obama… At this time, it counts about 106 members nationwide. The group is called “Africans & Americans for Obama.”

Franklin wants to gather what he called the “New Majority” Vote around the candidacy of the Illinois Senator for the Oval Office. On its web-blog’s main page, one can read this: “We are a Nationwide Network with a mission to gather and to inform the American electorate in its "New Majority" that includes many unspotted new voters, such as US-naturalized Africans ... All awakened and determined to "Make History", and to electing Senator Barack OBAMA as President of the United States of America in 2008”

" The hope generated in me during the Senator’s Springfield Illinois Presidential Bid and the dynamics for change that America needs after decades of failed policies and mismanaged governances, said Franklin who claimed that reason led him to align, head on, with the Obama campaign. Despite the pundits, biased national polls and favors from the media to the established candidate, Hillary Clinton, Franklin, just alike Barack Obama, believes in the audacity that an “improbable quest” can bear in a status quo.

“Senator Obama (who wasn’t running for president at that time) inspired me, not only after I heard his DNC speech in 04’, but more he made me adopt him as my role model among African Americans political figures during my graduation day in Boston. This is a while back in June 2006… Amazingly, I was lucky to have him as keynote speaker during my graduation at the University of Massachusetts-Boston ”, Commented Mr. Katunda.

His network for Obama extends from the Washington DC-Virginia-Maryland area where he has enrolled in a public affairs/media internship to Dallas Texas, where he hosted at a friend’s house, a little earlier in the race (April 07); it was part of a Nationwide Grassroots House Barbecue for Obama. About thirty people, Texans from all backgrounds and racial groups showed up for that social gathering at Kale Kasonga’s. As part of the Boston’s Chapter of the group “Umass-Boston for Obama”, he enrolled along with Brad Stoler (a former Umass-Boston Alumnus and friend) in the Manchester NH campaign office, providing phone banking (to update voters from the headquarters, through local phone calls) and participating in the most New England weather-challenged door-to-door canvassing in the NH neighborhoods.

“Time is now for American voters and especially new voters: US-naturalized Africans and (19 and+) first time voters to get involved and be part of the history in the making” said, Mr. Katunda. Diring his Dallas event, he inspired many voters, such as Andy Ribaudo of Dallas Texas to start his own high school online group, "Our World" at the latest barbecue in the Lone Star State.

“I don’t think there is any thing to loose supporting Obama at this point and time, and history will only reward audacious citizens for trying.” conferred to us Franklin, who write as an online community news editor of Congoboston.com.

In closing, we reproduce here an extract from the bus chatting: “ Governor, Sen. Obama inspired me when he gave a speech at my graduation (June 2nd 2006) at Umass-Boston; before heading to your fundraiser to support your bid for Governor of Massachusetts; and this happened on the same day afternoon at the Hines Convention Center, if I’m not mistaking… Today, I find myself priviledged to be onboard this bus with you and shake your hand. (A Citizen of Massachusetts and his Governor), both heading up to NH to support him for the Oval office… Isn’t it amazing?” -- Franklin Katunda

Dear readers ( US citizens or legal residents), to get involved in or support this movement for change as it goes beyond just the 2008 Elections, please send an email at Franklinkatunda@yahoo.com, and a reply will follow with an invitation to join the group. The main target will be to “get out” the African Vote in New Hampshire in the primaries (January 2008). Here below is the story about the field trip from the Boston Globe and a picture of Franklin Katunda posing with the Honorable Deval Patrick, Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts onboard the bus that took them to Nashua NH (A picture courtesy of an Obama Supporter)

Please copy and paste the following link on the address bar to see the photo:

My DocumentsMy PicturesObama.Paris.BostonObama.Paris.Boston 013.jpg

By the Congoboston Staff,

© November, 2007

Winter-Internship with Obama 08' in Early Caucuses

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:16:24 EST

Dear Obama Supporters,

Only a few days ( about 50 days) ...today is Nov. 12th 07 until the Iowa caucuses, and winter break is coming soon. We are thrilled to offer students the opportunity to join the Obama for America team in IA, NH, NV, or SC during winter break. You'll learn a lot, you'll meet an amazing group of dedicated young people from across the country, and, when Barack wins, you'll always be able to tell your friends that you were a part of history. If you can get to IA, NH, NV, or SC and can dedicate at least 1 week to the campaign, we'll supply housing on a first-come, first-served basis. SIGN UP TODAY for an experience you'll never forget: http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/winterintern Questions? Please sign up, and we'll get back to you right away. Please spread the word to all your friends!

GO OBAMA,

FIRED UP,

READY TO GO!

Senator Obama Stresses Violence in DR Congo and US

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:14:21 EST

Editorial: When Senator Obama talks about Violence against Women in US and the DR Congo…

By Franklin Katunda, coordinator for the Online Group "Africans and Americans For Obama"

Last year, in Washington DC, Sen. Barack Obama, along with twelve other US Senators (Republicans and Democrats) initiated a Bill in US Senate titled S.2125: The Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006.

While the European Union; for instance Belgium and France played a major role in securing the presidency to incumbent Joseph Kabila during the first Congo’s elections, the political process in the Congo deteriorated ever since because shaped by contested results. Here in US, in an absence of a coherent foreign policy in that regard, many envoys to the Congolese government played a significant role to design, to carry out and to deliver what they see as the first democratic presidential elections in this 47 years independent African nation; the 109th Senate bill was signed into law by President Bush, December 22, 2006. The Bill designed key roles the Bush Administration should play in ensuring that the new political leadership in the DRC lives by observing human rights and a good governance. The bulk of the resolution was based on the security of the people of the DR Congo, which implies ending the violence by all means and promoting the observance of human rights; the bill ordered the Administration to provide the US cooperation to president Joseph Kabila solely on a basis of progress in the area of democracy and good governance of this Central African country where more than 5 millions of people were killed (2001- Now) as a result of a genocide.

Last Wednesday Oct.31 2007, Senator Barack Obama, and even audaciousely, as Democratic Presidential Candidate went on a reality-check about the Bush Administration’s homework to assess whether or not it has made efforts to promote the observance of human rights domestically and abroad. He wrote an Op-Ed in Chicago Defender just few days after president Joseph Kabila of the DR Congo was received at the White House. Given the intensity of protests that took place in front of South façade of the Oval Office by Congolese-Americans and US Residents, it is surprising to see that the American Media did not cover the event nor stressed the reasons it was held for… More to the matter, Barack Obama seem to be the only US politician (as matter of fact the only presidential candidate) to notice these protests at the White House, and to mention twice at two different occasions, the name “Congo” , stressing its struggles in his addresses. The Illinois Senator, in the shadow of Abraham Lincoln, is definitely getting the attention of US-naturalized Congolese voters ( in 2008 elections ) as they see in him a future US president who really shows he is concerned about this African country; a long time US Ally. Senator, the initiator ofmthe S 2125 Senate Bill would definetly ensure a path to democracy and development, using a better diplomacy (based on the latest US senate bill) to help fix what's been wrong all along.

In the face of what some opinion here at home and in the Congo have called a "frail" follow up by the US government and the Department of State officials in regards to the political process in the DRC, many human rights violations and adverse security facts taking place on the ground (Congo) corroborated to assertions Washington DC's Congolese protesters have voiced up: they displayed some bloody and graphic pictures showing war atrocities and chanted slogans of disapproval to their recently "elected" president.

Are we talking about a possible failure by the US government to apply the S2125 senate bill yet? What If the Bush Administration argues it has passed the test… Is it safe to say that it has worked hard to pressure Congo's officials for the last 10 months (via diplomacy) for a peaceful and democratic process in the DR Congo?

Many Congolese-Americans and residents in US would disagree about it... In deed, they see in what the “Republican” administration does, the same pattern left by the Clinton Administration (Democratic) when they neglected any possibility for a US intervention before the Eastern Region Crisis; and when they lingered with an unsuccessful diplomacy, rooted on a bad foreigh policy when the conflict extended its roots to end up in a series of bloody and vindictive genocides in Rwanda (1994) and lately in the DR Congo (since J-Desire Kabila was enthroned in 1997).

Please read in the following Op-Ed by Senator Obama, a reality-check writing that applies to both, issues of violence against women in the US and the Democratic Republic of Congo and stressing the role the Administration ought to play. Above all, Senator Obama is promising to follow up (As President ) on the kinds of legislations he's got the sense and the knowledge of the rule of law to initiate, the ability as a legislator to secure in a strong bi-cameral Congress and the consistency in regards to the observance of human rights after it's enacted by the executive branch.

A Commentary by Franklin Katunda,

Chief-Editor of Congoboston.com

=========================================================

Violence Against Women, at Home and Abroad, Must End
By U.S. Sen. Barack Obama

Chicago Defender. October 31, 2007-- President Bush has an opportunity to assert America's moral leadership in the aftermath of Friday's meeting with President Joseph Kabila of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). President Bush should seize it by stepping up efforts to stop the epidemic of sexual violence in the DR Congo - an epidemic that is similarly devastating places like Darfur, where rape is the weapon of choice.

In recent years, tens of thousands of women and girls have been raped, tortured, and assaulted in the DR Congo by disgruntled soldiers and bands of marauders. One expert says this is so common in some places that it is "almost normal."

The decision to stop the violence rests with the Congolese, but the United States has a number of options - many of which were included in legislation I helped pass last year and addressed in a letter I sent to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earlier this month. These options range from making U.S. support contingent on Congolese efforts to stop the violence and care for the victims to building a coalition of donor nations to pressure the DRC into action. President Bush should make it clear that no diplomatic option is off the table.

But asserting America's moral leadership abroad requires more than strong, principled diplomacy. It requires setting a better example by stopping the violence that's committed against women here at home. One in four women suffers from domestic violence in her lifetime. In 2005, over 175,000 women reported being victims of rape or sexual assault. These statistics are numbing; they are also heartbreaking.

And yet, they only dimly reflect the full scale of the problem. Too often, women fear their stories of abuse will not be believed or blame themselves, and as a result, they don't come forward. But while a crime can go unreported, its consequences cannot be undone.

Abuse scars not only the victim but her loved ones, sending currents of violence that ripple across our society. Right now, a woman who's fled an abuser is living on the streets, wondering how long it will be before she has to turn to crime or prostitution to feed herself. Down the street, a child has shut the door and buried his head under the pillow so he doesn't have to hear his mother's cries, and there's a good chance he will grow up to be an abuser just like his father.

Government has a critical role to play in stopping this cycle of violence. Over the course of more than a decade in elective office, I have fought to assist the victims of sexual assault. And this is a commitment I will carry with me to the White House. As President, I will pass my plan to provide millions of dollars to strengthen programs aimed at preventing domestic violence and caring for those affected by it. I will also expand government efforts to offer domestic violence counseling in urban areas. And I will ensure that we fully fund the Violence Against Women Act, an important piece of legislation that I commend my colleague Senator Joe Biden for drafting.

We also need to ensure job security for victims of sexual assault, up to half of whom report losing their jobs as a result of being attacked. In Illinois, I led the fight to ensure that victims could seek shelter or treatment without losing their jobs, passing one of the strongest job protection laws in the nation. As President, I will make this a federal law. And I will expand the Family and Medical Leave Act to give additional job security to victims who need to take time off.

Finally, combating this problem demands a sustained high-level commitment. That is why, as President, I will appoint a special advisor who will report to me regularly on issues related to violence against women. This advisor will ensure that our agenda is coordinated across federal agencies, and fully implemented.

But government cannot stop a husband from striking his wife, or a woman from being assaulted on a deserted street. Ultimately, this problem has to be addressed by neighbors who are willing to report suspected crimes and by families who are willing to help loved ones come out of the darkness of isolation and into the light of justice. And we can all do our part by discussing this issue in public until we break down the stigma that still stops so many women from coming forward and bring about a change in the misogynistic attitudes that foster this violence.

Let's stop treating this as just a woman's issue. Whether it's hundreds of thousands of women being brutalized in the United States and around the world, or just a single friend whose boyfriend took advantage of her one night - when a woman is attacked on account of her gender, it is a human rights issue. And so long as it continues, the conscience of our nation cannot rest. (End)

An Op-Ed by Senator Barack Obama (Ill, D) in Chicago Defender. Oct. 31 2007.
Paid For by Obama For America, 2007

To learn more about the S2125 Senate Bill on the DR Congo, please click the following link:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-212

More Endorsements in Kansas, Missouri and Massachusetts !!!

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:45:58 EDT

Obama wins endorsement of Missouri-Kansas SEIU councilThe Associated Press | October 19, 2007

Staff Written

WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama on Thursday won the endorsement of the Missouri-Kansas State Council of the Service Employees International Union.

The council represents more than 15,000 members in both states.

SEIU decided last week not to make a national endorsement in the Democratic presidential primaries. But the union freed its state chapters to make their own endorsements.

"Sen. Obama has the judgment and vision necessary to lead our country in the right direction," said Sherwin Carroll, president of the council.

The Illinois Sen. was endorsed earlier this week by SEIU chapters in Illinois and Indiana, which have about 170,000 members.

Obama's Democratic rival, John Edwards, has been endorsed by 10 other state chapters of the union, including the crucial state of Iowa. Those chapters represent nearly 1 million members, or about half the union's national membership.

Obama has been ramping up his campaign organization in Missouri. Last week, his campaign opened an office in Kansas City and he plans to open another office in St. Louis within the next two weeks, spokesman Ben LaBolt said.

Read the full article from The Associated Press

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Patrick to back Obama's campaign

The Boston Globe | October 18, 2007 By Frank Phillips

Governor Deval Patrick will throw his support behind Barack Obama in the Democratic presidential campaign, an endorsement that could give the Illinois senator a boost in the crucial New Hampshire primary and may help Obama blunt some of Senator Hillary Clinton's recent success in winning African-American support.Administration officials confirmed that the governor called Obama yesterday to pledge his endorsement, and Patrick's volunteers began working out the details of a public rally in Boston Tuesday.

Patrick also called Clinton yesterday to break the news that he would endorse her opponent. Patrick has strong ties to the New York senator from serving as a Justice Department official during the Clinton administration. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton had lobbied Patrick for his endorsement.Patrick chose Obama because the governor believes the country is hungry for a fresh leadership style, one that stirs up strong voter enthusiasm, Patrick administration officials said.The most immediate advantage for Obama is Patrick's ability to dispatch volunteers, who were a major factor in his gubernatorial victory last year, to New Hampshire to campaign.

Patrick sent e-mail last night to 40,000 workers and supporters, informing them of his decision.Many national and state polls suggest Clinton is in the lead and Obama has stalled in a distant second place. And recent polls indicate that Clinton has built a lead of more than 20 percentage points over him among the Granite State's Democratic primary voters.Political specialists said the value of the endorsement will depend on what Patrick can deliver in terms of Massachusetts volunteers willing to travel to New Hampshire on weekends to knock on doors.

The Massachusetts governor's endorsement, on its own, doesn't count for much in the Granite State, said Dante Scala, an associate professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire."Patrick's ultimate value will be in terms of people power, because typically in New Hampshire, endorsements by out-of-state political figures don't hold a lot of weight," he said.Patrick's endorsement could count highly in southern New Hampshire communities that are oriented to Massachusetts and, in particular, Boston-based media. Those areas have a large population of voters who could be open to a pro-Obama message, Scala said.

Patrick is expected to argue in the coming weeks that Obama can lead a "generational call," a rally to inspire young voters to rebuild the country and restore its standing around the world. Patrick feels that the issue of Obama's relative inexperience is overblown, administration officials said.Jeffrey Berry, a political science professor at Tufts University, said Patrick's endorsement will be significant because it will reinforce Obama's most potent weapon: his broad-based appeal to voters."

For Obama, a Patrick endorsement is another sign there is a new, young generation of dynamic black leaders who can appeal across racial and partisan lines," Berry said.Patrick and Obama have traveled similar personal and career paths. Both have roots in Chicago, hold Harvard law degrees, and have emerged in the past several years as the principal figures in a new generation of African-American political leaders. Both have passionate grass-roots support.They met when Obama was a civil rights lawyer in Chicago and Patrick was head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. Obama campaigned for Patrick several times during the governor's race, raising money for him in Chicago in late 2005, when Patrick's gubernatorial bid looked like a longshot. They dined together recently on Martha's Vineyard at the home of a friend."We understand they have been longstanding friends and they share the same strategists," said Mo Elleithee, a Clinton campaign press spokesman.There could be some limits on Patrick's time to campaign.

Patrick's first-year agenda is on the line on Beacon Hill until the legislative session ends Nov. 21. Patrick will also miss a week in December when he leads a Massachusetts trade mission to China.New Hampshire lawmakers are considering whether to move the state's primary election to as early as Dec. 11. If not, the primary will be held in early January.A recent CNN poll suggests Clinton holds a significant lead over Obama among black voters. Just last week, the New York senator pulled off a coup when US Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia and a hero of the civil rights movement, endorsed her.

Read the full article from The Boston Globe

Obama Raises $1 Million Online in 1 Day

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:58:36 EDT

Obama Raises $1 Million Online in 1 Day

Supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama responded to his call Tuesday for help in closing the fundraising gap with New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. From noon Tuesday to 5 p.m. Wednesday, they donated more than $1 million online, according to his campaign. The Illinois Senator sent out an e-mail message to backers yesterday, setting a goal of raising $2.1 million to catch Clinton.

Responding to the third quarter fundraising reports, filed Monday, Obama wrote, “Washington lobbyists have chosen their candidate and are determined to provide her with an overwhelming advantage.” He entreated his supporters to donate $25 each and counteract “the most entrenched political machine in Democratic politics.” The Obama campaign Web site promptly posted a “Closing the Gap” graphic displaying a running total of online donations coming in, with images of Obama supporters en masse contrasted with four lone Hillary backers in suits. As of 5 p.m. Wednesday, the site reported $1.1 million in donations for the initiative.

Calls and e-mail messages to the Clinton campaign were not returned.

Hillary and Edwards steal Obama's Line and Headlines

Franklin Katunda — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:22:04 EDT

Hillary and Edwards steal Obama's line and Headlines

Hillary is airing new ads in NH, talking about "Change". She hopes to tie a longtime and campaign backbone Obama's line of "Change" to "Experience", which she still has to prove she is NOT in love with DC lobbyists who will kill any universal healthcare's attempt the American people should get right this time, she still has to explain to the electorate her Iraq's war vote did not hurt our country, our military and our foreign relations, she still needs to go extra miles to prove that the American people are not just voting for "another" party name in washington DC in 08, but a leader that will actually allow them to initiate change from bottom up, and to get the job done both, inside and outside the beltway... If she struggles with answering these questions, Barack Obama doesn't. That's why he is not called "ready for change", but he is the best agent to initiate change from the bottom up.

Stealing and pandering on the "Change" line, Hillary is playing old school as looser as that it may sound, and she won't get anywhere with it in 2008, because the American people know who started that LINE and the meaning to it. Besides Hillary saying of herself: "ready for change" John Edwards did the same when he start calling himself last month a "candidate for change", but all this cannot fool the 2008 wisened electorate. These descent Americans know that Obama is NOT claiming either one, but he says what he understands, and that truth is that besides all these good candidates plans, "it is time for change in the ways of Washington... It's time for America to turn the page on the past mismanagements in both our government and politics in DC." It takes a new face, an inspiring, unifying and most appealing candidate to the American people to sustain their confidence in order to break our government from K street strong lobby influences and to end its old dirty politics' tentacules.

To steal september's headlines, Hillary and Bill Clinton went on and appeared on many media shows such as the Ellen's show and Larry King this month simply to down play Obama's BIG O'headlines coming up this Saturday.... They calculate and trick the public, trying to use the media's buzz; simple is that! And that is part of their longtime old dirty politics!!!

Nevertheless, we are going forward on the Obama's side with the September "OPRAH'S ENDORSEMENT" which will bring millions of O'viewers behind senator Barack Obama; thousands of O'network members' emails to Obama; some millions in $ money contributions; the women's vote; more of the African-American vote.

Finally, this O'Endorsement will bring the middle class/mainstream of Americans (all racial backgrounds) to the table of the O'movement's debate and involvement.

Watch California this Saturday:

" On Saturday, Winfrey will host her first-ever presidential fundraising affair on the grounds of the Promised Land, her 42-acre ocean- and mountain-view estate in Montecito, Calif. - an event that is expected to raise more than $3 million for Obama's campaign" - CBS News, 9/5/07

An "Obama-Oprah" Ticket? Yeah, why not? Every candidate is craving for it...It's as efficient as some of these unions' endorsements for an aggressive grassroots get-go. Our campaign has a strong grassroots presence already far better than most democrat candidates, the O'Endorsement will adds more and more boost.

GO OBAMA-OPRAH 08'

New Orleans/Labor Day: Two speeches, Two Milestones...

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:06:31 EDT

Dear friends,

Have you ever spent time to analyze the depth of some of Senator Obama's speeches? Well the man has a diversity of styles serving one campaign, one people. For instance, he can genuinly appeal to New Orleans' residents during a church celebration for the "Year 2" since Katrina, while at the same time, he makes a call for renewal, in another style of speech to NH primary voters and activists to mobilize and to engage more in the movement for change on the day of round "2" of his presidential race (... labor day).

Two events: the first one happened in the sinister state of Louisiana, where Hope is still needed and obviousely a fundamental change; the Illinois senator called for a strong foundation, a new foundation to unveils the real moral values the American leaders ought to show towards the empoverished victims of the Hurricane; he chose to echoe another renewal keynote during a half away road to the 08' elections. Obama is calling for a change in the ways we treat one another as a people (i'm my brother's keeper, my sister's keeper); he calls here for a change in the way we deal with our domestic issues that are so vital to the lives of Americans...something most people have failed to show.

The second event takes place in Manchester NH on Labor Day; his later speech is seen as a kick-off for a "round two" in the presidential campaign. So far, I see this speech AS A MILE STONE for this long race to 08' This is a moment of the truth: a time to take on some of these Washington "insiders" who yesterday engaged an unecessary fight against Obama over "experience". No doubt, they gave to the senator another momentum to start debating on how we as a campaign will engage the American people to discern "common sense", "good judgement" versus the "conventional thinking" and the politics of washington DC.

We understand that these "insiders" politcal errors that led Congress and the current White House into politics of fear, cynism and triangulation affected republicans and most democrats and have divided our country. And before the American people gives up on its leadership that it elected in 2006, we need Barack Obama to be that democratic president who will bring back the confidence of the American people.

We need a new direction, led by a "new majority" vote behind the Obama campaign, a new majority in lawmaking, a new face of fairness in the judicial system (supreme court, attorney general's office, the department of justice) and Barack is calling for a new and sound foreign policy that will unveil elements presented in his counterterrorism plan, so far the only sound and articulate plan in the democratic opposition to the war in Iraq. Why? because it calls America to engaging in the real war on terror.

There is a reason why I believe that Hillary Clinton won't end the war in Iraq, simply because she doesn't think it was a mistake to authorize it... de facto, she denies the gravity of the situation of war her decision has left us with as a nation, I find it so difficult for her to end a war she engaged in. Other insiders like Biden, Dodds, all bundled with her to defend their "experience" that led Congress in pitfalls, that will lead us without major difficulties because of those who authorized and initially funded it. America is not ready for a candidate who claims she is " ready for change", but a candidate who "calls for change" in order to turn the page: the best way to engage the american people, disgusted by divisive and cynical politics in both sides of the aisle. America obviousely needs an unifying leader who demonstrates a record of sound judgement in his decisions and past tangible and verifiable accomplishments that helps the american people.

So think about it.

Here an extract from Senator Obama's speech to New Hampshire voters and the country:

"... And so I'm asking you -- if you believe it's time to challenge the Washington politics that have let us down and shut us out and made us settle;

if you believe it's time to restore a sense of mission to our politics and a sense of possibility to America;

if you want a country that no longer sees itself as a collection of Red States and Blue States;

if you want a President who can lead a United States of America, then I ask you to believe in this campaign;

I ask you to believe in yourself, I ask you to believe again in the dream that we call America."

-- Senator Barack Obama on Labor Day in Manchester NH.

GO 08AMA'

A Black Leader Defends Obama on "Blackness" Question

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:15:19 EDT

Dear Friends,

I'm glad that not only a prominent first black governor of the state of Virginia, Douglass Wilder sets a new tone to this "irrelevant" debate. He appears to be the first elected official of african descent in this 08 ELECTION to defend the US senator running to be the first black for higher office. He is challenging those asking if Obama is black enough, and also says that the Illinois senator can offer something the DNC has been dreaming about, delivering the southern vote....Please read his says on RTTNews.

Enjoy, Franklin

==================================================================

Wilder Says Obama Could Loosen Republican Grip On South

(RTTNews) - L. Douglas Wilder, who in 1989 became the nation's first elected black governor, said in an interview published today that Sen. Barack Obama could loosen the Republican Party's grip on the South.Wilder, now the mayor of Richmond, said in an interview with The Politico that he doesn't think Obama "would be an easy target for the Republicans," adding that he will campaign for the first-term Illinois senator.The 76-year-old Wilder, known for his candor, criticized African-American activists who have questioned whether Obama is "black enough" in his style and political leanings. Wilder said the rift has arisen because Obama is not interested in "the pimping of race." "What is blackness?" he asked rhetorically. "Is it the way you talk? Do you got to say, 'Dey this, dey dat.' Or the way you dress? Or is it the forgiving of certain things? What is black enough? Is (Jesse) Jackson black enough? Is (Al) Sharpton black enough?"

Speaking of the Democratic front-runner, Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York, Wilder said her 2002 vote authorizing military force to depose former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and her explanations for supporting the measure could be a liability in his home state of Virginia and in other similarly moderate states."The question keeps coming about Hillary, as polarizing as she is: Would she be the best candidate?" Wilder said. "People would probably disagree, but today, I think Obama would have the best chance of winning in a general election because he doesn't carry any baggage."

For comments and feedback: contact editorial@rttnews.com

Hillary Clinton, J. Biden, C. Dodds, Giuliani and Romney wrong on Foreign Policy

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:32:51 EDT

This is becoming clearer that the panderers and insiders are loosing the battle and will loose the final battle for 08'

I mean, here you are talking about a former NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER giving a very different opinion that the American people are becoming conscious about, better than "Experienced" Hillary Clinton, Dodds, Biden, Giuliani and Romney whose attacks on Obama's foreign relations philosophy were phony and irrelevant !!! Forget about former Clinton's experts: Ms. Allbright and Mr. Holbrooke they did and will not deliver good deeds as far as US foreign relations are concerned in 2008 era.

(Please read an extract of this article from the Bloomberg site)

GO OBAMA 08'

=============================================================

``Obama is clearly more effective and has the upper hand,'' Brzezinski, who was President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, said. ``He has a sense of what is historically relevant, and what is needed from the United States in relationship to the world.''

Brzezinski, 79, dismissed the notion that Clinton, 59, a New York senator and the wife of former President Bill Clinton, is more seasoned than Obama, 46. ``Being a former first lady doesn't prepare you to be president,'' Brzezinski said.

Clinton's foreign-policy approach is ``very conventional,'' Brzezinski said. ``I don't think the country needs to go back to what we had eight years ago.''

``There is a need for a fundamental rethinking of how we conduct world affairs,'' he added. ``And Obama seems to me to have both the guts and the intelligence to address that issue and to change the nature of America's relationship with the world.''

Negotiating With Foes

Brzezinski also sided with Obama, who was criticized by Clinton as being ``irresponsible'' and ``naive'' for saying he would meet in his first year as president with leaders of adversaries such as Iran and Syria. ``What's the hang-up about negotiating with the Syrians or with the Iranians?'' Brzezinksi said. ``What it in effect means'' is ``that you only talk to people who agree with you.''

Clinton has the backing of her own Democratic foreign- policy heavyweights, including former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Richard Holbrooke, both of whom served in her husband's administration.

Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, had no comment on Brzezinski's remarks.

Iraq

Brzezinski, a harsh critic of the Bush administration's war in Iraq, slammed President George W. Bush for claiming progress is being made in Iraq and for asserting in an Aug. 22 speech that an early pullout would lead to the kind of bloodshed Southeast Asia experienced after American forces left Vietnam.

The addition of about 30,000 U.S. troops in recent months ``may be making some progress in some suburbs of Baghdad, but I don't think anyone claims that it marks the turning point in what is clearly a failure,'' Brzezinski said.

``And the president's speech itself was an admission of a colossal failure, a colossal failure,'' he said. ``Four and a half years after his invasion of Iraq, he's now saying that if we withdraw, Iraq ends up like Vietnam or even worse.''

A U.S. intelligence report released yesterday said the troop increase has had some success in curbing violence and there have been ``modest improvements in economic output,'' yet ``Iraq's sectarian groups remain un-reconciled'' and al-Qaeda ``retains the ability to conduct high-profile attacks.''

Brzezinski said Bush wants to ``bequeath the war to his successor.''

``As long as that war goes, we're going to be tied, handcuffed in dealing with foreign affairs,'' he said. ``Our relations with China, with Russia are deteriorating, we don't have freedom of action, we're despised worldwide.''

The Bloomberg

Keeping an Eye on the DNC 's deeds

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:31:57 EDT

Dear Friends,

Now that the CNN/YOU TUBE debate has unveiled what I have always predicted, things are starting moving in the right direction with our movement, when it is getting now Mayor Fenty's support, besides the role that will play the "vote and money gatherer" Oprah Winfrey.

It's always good and reassuring to know you are not alone perceiving what the commotion around you seemed not to catch. We are on the right track, my friends!!! We have the right candidate in Barack Obama. Although, I am just tempted to warn the Democrats to avoid another "2004 Dean / than Kerry than nothing" experience to the detriment of the American people. The Democratic-controlled Congress's approval rating is a proof of the bad shape of the party even when winning: they always hesitate!

Knowing that "W. Bush" was the only choice they could offer to win the general elections in 2004, republicans gave him the ticket. Clinton without Bill's resume is just simply a "polarizing" figure even within Democratic circles. All the last 3 debates show it (Progressist democrats, the YearlyKos and the AFL-CIO forum) when get discontent democrats on her way. She had proven to make less "electable" comments as far as the democratic base is concerned, to the point where I truly question the polls that show her leading the field, just like to believe that "Fred Thompson" is more electable than those on the GOP arena at thisd time, while no one has credible foundation in arguments to back it up. They are just framing the news to favor Hillary. Even the conservatives are playing the game after the dems, looking for a "weak" nominee on the liberal side.

Will Democrats nominate Hillary Clinton, hoping that her husband's prestige will play for the party in general elections? Wrong strategy: Here's what I know as a bottom line: Clinton vs Giuliani = Hillary will fail; but Obama vs Giuliani= Giuliani will fail... That's reality.

So, Obama supporters, we have another battlefield to conquer right now before Labor Day; Lets begin challenging the Democratic National Committee and many other major constituency movements and netroots within to play a "safer" role in channeling this primary process cautiousely. We want to save America from another republican triumph over a democrat "wrong" candidate, Hillary [ too polarizing to appeal to Independents and Republicans]-a key in winning general elections.

Lets stay away from the media "inevitable" hype and lets dismiss a "democratic" white house that will look very much like another Bush/Cheney "four-more-years-of-fiasco" because America is awaiting and is ready for change in the presidency (meaning a leader who will lead Congress to reach out to republicans on key national issues in order to rebuild.)

Senator Obama said it: His current experience is enough to know that the ways of politics as usual have to go, and wants to work in sweeping his Ethic Reform Plan that will bring Washington DC to the people's scrutinity, curtailing all those lobbyist strangulating ties from our both domestic and foreign policy.

To beat the GOP, we've got all the good reasons to deliver the right white house contender in the primaries, this time. I'm sick and tired of "hypocrit" Democrats, being less smart /strategic while their opponents are. Sad thing, democrats are even playing that old school politics on Obama'S RACIAL background when they have a chance on their side like back in 2004; and they still debating about his Washington's experience while the American people agrees that the ways of DC ( K Street's lobbyits, the White house, the Capitol and Administration agencies... ) have got to change their operation standard procedures.

Talking about experience, I would argue that the economist Alan Greenspan may be the greatest to run! But, If the american people wouldn't agree about his manager's high skills and leadesrhip to believe him in the white house, besides senate veterans like Joe Biden, Bill Richardson, than a candidate for a "reform" is what democrats really need to take Washington back, for Christ sake!

Democrats, we won't win 2008 from wicked republicans with a DC insider, or a name (Clinton) or a resume (Richardson) or a Senioriry (Biden).

"Barack Obama is the real deal our party has at this time" to get more seats in Congress in '08 after winning the white house!

I will be in Manchester, NH (August 2008) for canvassing. We went there twice for both phone banking and canvassing last May 19th and July 1st at the NH headquarters, and this is what I will tell my fellow (Democrats) prospectives on the phone if I get any of these junky democrats.

Guys don't get worried nor weary, our Movement has got to prove the DNC wrong about this race. Our grassroots movement? all republicans and democrats are so jealous and wish they had that chance. Our message is refreshing and speaks louder than a negative ad, a smear comment from Biden, Dodds (whom will drop out soon) during a debate.

Blessings, and let keep the momentum in NEVADA, NH, IOWA and SOUTH CAROLINA to win 08 !!! (Remember Joe Lieberman was a "top" poll runner and a name (like Hillary) in 04, but never won the nomination)

Franklin

Bringin the Obama Buzz to Paris and London

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:22:17 EDT

Dear Barack Obama Supporters,

Just to say Hi and to let you know i am in Europe. I live in Washington DC from where I took an overnight flight via Boston. You know as an excited Obama supporter, I have my OBAMA tee-shirt with me and would take some photos with a few Londoneers and Parisians for Obama... At the Eiffel Tower and so forth.

Right now, I am in Paris (Monday July 23 thru Wedn. 25) and will head to LONDON on thursday july 26 to have a full day visit of London

Is there any Obama supporter who would like to meet with me and take some photos or video to be posted on YouTube? Ideas like photos at the buckingham palace or outside of the Tower Bridge....

Email me back tonight or tommorow by clicking on my profile or send it to franklinkatunda@yahoo.com (as a matter of facts i will be watching the debate LIVE on CNN webstream from Charlestown SC at 1 AM Tuesday Paris time...

If you email me back, we certainly will exchange phone numbers and meet. GO OBAMA !!!!!! It is a short trip, so lets try doing something. Do you have anything to say about it, WAYNE? Since you object every move we make... Feel free. You will see photos on this blogg tomorrow. That is the movement we have with senator Barack Obama.

THE OBAMA buzz GOES TO PARIS AND LONDON
Please share with any Obama supporter in these two European cities

Franklin

Bring the "16 VOTES" INITIATIVE back to End the Iraq War

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:06:49 EDT

WAR IN IRAQ'S DEBATE IS BACK

I said it yesterday on the blog, and I'm glad Senator Obama is talking about Iraq again: "16 votes" from republican senators to stand up to Bush and his veto is what Democrats need to end the war ASAP, but the sad reality is that just a few of these Dems' are capable to rally, work along their party lines to get more opponents to agree w/them, including "Hillary Clinton" who's by her polarizing face, has been incapable for her whole so-called "senate experience" to so so.

Barack Obama, before and during his US senate term shows leadership about the Iraq issue, his good spirit in rallying opponents to his unifying ideas: Rep. Sen. Lugar, Voinovich, Snow, joined NH senators Judd Gregg and John Sununu in this Iraq debate, and even Warner are moving to seeking a change of course in Iraq. Because Hillary supporters think it's weak to work with republicans, WELL they should not blame Congress for NOT be able to end the war; if their leader Hillary is still denying her "Vote-for-the-War" was a mistake.

Are we aware of the fact that we are the only candidate's supporters who get to play this role, far above Dodd, Biden, Edwards, Richardson?

Maybe those Obama supporters who did the May 19th canvassing Kick-off; followed by those who did the June 9th "Walk for Change" would know exactly what is at stake here. I ASK BARACK OBAMA WEBMASTER TO BRING BACK THE "16 VOTES TO OVERRIDE THE VETO" BACK IN OUR WEBSITE...

Guys, lets get to work and help the American people save the lives of their nephews and nieces, their sons, daughters, and neighbors who are fighting without a tangible and good cause on Iraq.

I like to think and it's true that the American people knows the "real" democrat cadidate they can trust when it comes to "End the War in Iraq"...Senator Barack Obama has got the momentum, inspite of Hillary Clinton whose stance is polarizing to her own political base: [ She said we are safer than before 911...the American Soldiers have done their job, the Iraqi failed to so their part, hoping to win either centrists, moderates or liberal democrats.. And in all this, Senator Obama suceeds because of "your" action at the grassroots level, rallying to stop the war.

Obama said this campaign is a vehicle for your hopes and your dreams and the American people should count on us to find a political force to call for a war de-escalation. Guys, we, Obama supporters, will be remembered in the January 08 primary polls: I will suggest to be pro-active in what Congress has failed to do, is for Obama Supporters to call "Anti-War" rallies, sponsored by our own supporters, if Mr Bush fails to order a redeployment after general Petraeus' report by September 07.

Please let keep the eye on the ball, forget about the democrats, the media. To get the first ones straight, we will launch out the army of our supporters to do what they are not willing to do in Congress, and to the second ones if we go with a strategy to stop their biased, framing news and polls analysis, WE CAN create multiple Obama websites with Video players and promote existing ones to create more online traffics, using links of networks such as "Students for Obama" or " Firefighters for Obama"; "Educators for Obama"; "Universal Heathcare Supporters fos Obama... even far "Anti-Iraq War for Obama" Their main role will be to get voters we rally to belong to groups where they can speak their jargon, discuss their issues and voice their opinions in a more direct way as far as the editorial orientation is considered.

These online news networks will work with an editorial team of professionals and will only require a 50$ per month domain to pay besides hiring some writing and web/editing-skilled volunteers, AND if launched besides the My.barackobama website to which they will post links, will be a grassroot press "reality-check" tool to confront the US media machine, some hypocrit journalists and commentators "morally" corrupted by politicians from the establishment...You know who i'm talking about. I have a little bit of experience about how "... community media can be used to empower the citizens and bring change in the way government and powers deal with public affairs."

This is working and we can do it. It's been my idea and soon I'm launching a multi-lingual website for Obama (with a high search engine capability), and would need Spanish, French and English Obama supporters to help translate.

We have got to rally our political opponents OR if they don't agree, beat them. in this case our opponents include: first, Hillary honeymooners, than the biased-Media pundits, and finally the republicans.

ITALIAFOROBAMA: Obama famous in Italy !!!!

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:54:48 EDT

Great News !!!!!

Barack Obama is getting momentum in more countries overseas. Lately a group to support him for presidency has started in Italy with a bunch of excited Americans and Italians. A local Italian Senator ANTONIO IOVENE even endorse publicly the ideas of the senator from Illinois. Last and not the least, his book "AUDACITY OF HOPE" has been published on a translated version in Italian:" Barack Obama-L'audacia della speranza"

http://libri.rizzoli.rcslibri.it/sclibro.php?isbn=1701658

Here a story from a friend of Obama in Italy, Ali Baba is his name:

***
Dear friends,

Today the public debut of the first italian committee for Barack Obama I promoted the last March, 31. The event will be covered by a one hour direct broadcast on Radio and TV (Radio Città Futura and NessunoTV - SKYtv).

With me, they will attend to the event: Anthony Sistilli (Democrats Abroad - Italy); Jeff Israeli (Correspondent of Time Magazine), Guido Moltedo and Marilisa Palumbo (Authors of the first Obama Biografy in Italian).

Special guest the african musician Pape Sirman Kanouté (Mandingo sound). This is absolutely a Première and it will increase the Obamamania in Italy.

A cosmopolitan audience of 300 Obama's Fans is expected. I'm so excited and my emotion is at the top. So I would like to share my emotion.

***

HILLARY CLINTON vs. BARACK OBAMA

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:35:42 EDT

HILLARY CLINTON VS. BARACK OBAMA

*" I'm ready to lead...." (Her-self) VS * "It's time to turn the page... " (All together)

* Appears as a gender minority figure VS * Appears as a racial minority figure

* 8 active years in US Senate VS * 1 and half active year in US Senate

* 8 years as First Lady VS * 8 years as Elected State Senator

* Worked with Citizens as first lady VS * Worked with Citizens as Organizer

* People's experience in White House VS * People's experience in a State Senate

* Has Policy Legislation Resume VS * Has Policy Legislation + the Citizen Approach

* Has been a Practicing Lawyer VS * Was Civil Rights Lawyer, Laws Teacher

* Authorized the War in Iraq, 2002 VS * Opposed the War in Iraq, 2002

* Voted against "IRAQ No-timetable" VS * Voted against "IRAQ No-timetable"

* Claims Past Experience in DC VS * Claims a New Kind of Politics in DC

* From the DC Establishment VS * From Grassroots Organizing

* "Politics as Usual" with minor changes VS * Change the Ways of DC politics

* Wants a change in White House VS * Wants change in Washington's politics

* Will deliver a lowered-cost Healthcare VS * Will deliver a Universal Healthcare

* Getting Endorsements from official Dems VS * Gaining Constituency from grassroots efforts

* Most Polarizing Face in US Politics VS * Most Unifying Face in US Politics

* Partisan/ Lobbyist-Oriented Politician VS * Bi-partisan/ Populist-Oriented Politician

* Fair political profile (Baggage) VS * Good political profile (Clean)

* Condemns but likely to Pardon another "Libby" VS * Likely to Punish even a Democrat "Libby"-like

* Likely to run as "Hillary-Bill-VicePresident" VS * Likely to run as "Obama-VicePresident"

* Likely to win Blue States in generals VS * Likely to win both Blue & Red States

* Loyalistic, Dynasty-like leadership VS * Citizen-Participatory type of Leadership

* Appealing to Dems & Indep Voters VS * Appealing to Dems, Reps & Indep Voters

* Symbol of a Democrats "Coming Back" VS * Symbol of change to a divided-Washington

* Appearances influence framing news/polls VS * Appearances get more in Contributions

* 27 Millions Raised from 150k supporters VS * 32.5 Millions Raised from 250K supporters

* Rally Crowds: 3-5 K people VS * Rally Crowds: 20 K people

* Networkers to recruit Volunteers VS * Army of Small Donors becoming Volunteers

* Never been endorsed by a Republican VS * Got an honest Republican Endorsement

* Likely to work w/an "out-sider" to cabinet VS * Likely to lead with his cabinet's policy

* A Sound-bytes Comander-in-Chief VS * A Thoughtful Commander-in-Chief

* An Unapologetic-type of a Leader VS * A Sincere and Sober Leader

* Appears cold, calculating, ever changing VS * Appears to be him-self, honest and connected

* No Previous Presidential Experience * No Previous Presidential Experience

This List is NOT all inclusive….

Thanks,
By Franklin Katunda

Movie SICKO: Hillary politically "dated" with Healthcare lobbyists

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:06:08 EDT

Guys I just got this recent news on the Michael Moore's movie that came out recently in cinema: Let's spot and get a "uTUBE" sequence that will feature a part of Moore's movie SICKO on healthcare...It shows Hillary's entourage past dealings with healthcare lobbyists.

Sen. Obama deserves the nomination. PERIOD! ( Please Read this article )

Moore Says Weinstein Wanted Clinton Scene Cut

By Politics
Friday, June 22, 2007; A05

Michael Moore is getting a lot of mileage out of the hit he takes on Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in his provocative new movie "Sicko," which made its Washington premiere Wednesday night at the Uptown theater.

Moore said after the premiere that movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, a personal friend and supporter of the Clintons whose company financed the film, "begged" him to remove a scene exposing Hillary Clinton as the second-highest recipient of campaign donations from the health-care industry.

"I said, 'No, Harvey. I gotta do the right thing.' He understood."

Moore said he didn't know whether the Clintons asked Weinstein to make the call.

The film describes her as "sexy" and "sassy" as photos of Clinton over the years are splashed on the screen.

After her health-care overhaul plan failed, Clinton went "silent" -- as Moore put it -- on the need for health-care changes. And then she began raking in the dough -- big time -- from the industry when she started running for office.

Clinton's campaign had no comment on Weinstein's attempt to have the scene removed.

BARACK, THE REAL MEANING OF "TAKING BACK AMERICA"

Franklin Katunda — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:36:33 EDT

BARACK, THE REAL MEANING OF "TAKING BACK AMERICA"

Hilton Hotel, Washington DC -- I attended today's progressive forum, "Take Back America" 2007, during which I listened to senator Barack Obama. The diverse crowd hosted by the PDA (Progressive Democrats of America) got electrified by every line the speaker articulated; the audience with applauses welcomed candidate's views as he spoke passionately. He made a good speech during which he echoed his "laid-out" plans and policy proposals for his next presidential term.

He touched the heart of democrats and far, the ones of most "TAKE BACK AMERICA" attendees, mostly progressives and also all candidates' supporters, reclaiming the Heritage that Americans cherish most; the fight for civil rights, for voting rights, for the rights of middle class workers to unionize. Far more, the crowd all stood up, when he called on America regain its role in the world by closing Guantanamo, and Abhu Graib war detention centers.

"I opposed this war (Iraq Invasion) from the start" is the keynote in the deal that shows a willingness of a white house hopeful candidate to end the war in Iraq, no strings attached, and better than any other democrat frontrunner would honestly do, given circumstances at stakes. This very line in senator's speech, if well exploited, will take Barack Obama through this race, clean, with "real" grassroots endorsements, as he once again like to mention that " we are building this movement from the bottom-up." Speaking of his character, Senator Obama reminded the audience the type of leader he will be, when he took his best shot, aiming a tough message at powerful auto-makers in Detroit, Michigan; He called on lofty car makers to thrive for fuel efficient cars for a clean air fuel for America and less dependent on foreign oil.

Most of all, he showed that celebrating Selma is not just an African-American history to the eyes of the citizens who joined a movement from bottom-up, but a celebration of the American history that inspired president Lyndon Johnson to sign on granting civil liberties to Americans who have been co-habiting to this day: Asian-Americans, African-Americans, Latinos, Whites; which assertion the audience, standing in that International Ballroom agreed with as they applauded franticly.

After Obama's shining appearance, I looked at one's face in the audience, and could see joy and excitement we usually see on people's face, after listening to a State of Union's Address. "What a presidential leadership in such a young senator?" commented a woman who sat on the same row as I was. Joel, a New- York Intern-Student in DC, whom I met in the metro to the event, suggested to me: " I have got to tell you, Hillary is from my home state -- (he is from Queens), but it's my first time listening-live to a Senator Obama address. I think he is a genuine candidate... He speaks from the heart; Truly, a sincere candidate and a leader. He has what Democrat candidates have lacked for a long time. What it will take us to win back the White house", said Joel.

Barack Obama showed the audience what went wrong in America during his speech, than came up with good ideals from our constitutional principles and his leadership stance, and finally associated all of the above to sound and pragmatic proposals for a change now and in a near future. The US Junior Senator from Illinois appears much like a promising future Head of State, when he evokes the need of an intelligent and balanced foreign policy; " He is the last chance the democratic party has in order to turn the page on the last 2004 presidential elections we lost, and to win the higher office in 2008", I heard from a young supporter who shortly after did not wait to hear the next speaker.

More than half of the attendance emptied the ballroom soon as senator Obama concluded is speech. A female student from Virginia to say while descending the steps of the ballroom: " Not only that Barack represents the best candidate to face the GOP, he is not polarizing, with a quiet inexistent political baggage (he meant ... the ways of Washington DC); versus a pretty impressive record of a community organizer who registered thousands of Illinois voters through grassroots drives."

Obama's accomplishments are part of the ingredients that will help this “Obama movement” to stir up a new recipe for a new kind of politics, when he says: He's "... been long enough in Washington DC to know that its ways must change!" Senator Obama has been a teacher of constitutional laws, a state senator that worked to put together several bi-partisan pieces of legislation that elevated the state of Illinois to believe once again president Abraham Lincoln’s idea of an improbable quest for Washington DC. He suggests to the audience some of the essentials, clearly showing that to carry out a good leadership in the white house, there is no need of a lengthy Washington's resume, rather his past ideas, his political discipline (e.g. opposing the invasion in Iraq in 2002) and experience in state of Illinois had also enriched his Capitol's stance while US Senator since 2004 and in his quest for the 08’ nomination.

For a candidate like Barack Obama, more is to expect. He raised the most money for his campaign from ordinary citizens than frontrunner Clinton and every other candidate on March 31st, based on that huge precedent, America should ALSO expect an improbable support from a MORE diverse constituency, made of Democrats, Independents and even Republicans he proves to connect to, so easily. Same as for past fundraising results, frontrunner Barack Obama will continue to confuse pollsters once again, because he doesn't sit on his hands, working on "collecting" endorsements from officials and politicians, or leveling the pundits diagrams, or just monitoring some framed news from “corporate America's” opinion networks called the “Media”; rather Obama, out of the buzz’ radar, maps out a new political landscape in America, using an incredible and fast growing grassroots machine of hungry Americans.

I am more than certain, founded on my expertise as a community organizer and scholar in the field, that the January 2008's outcomes will play good for Obama; and in spite of biased or contradicting polls, they will reveal (out of the ballots) an incredible confirmation of a "hunger for change" in the American people, whom (Republicans, Democrats and Independents) are expecting a radical change in politics and better governance on January 2009.

** Reporting from the DC’s Hilton Hotel, on Connecticut Ave, I'm Franklin Katunda.

Listed online in 10 barackobama.com’s campaign national groups

No More Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton in 08’: Obama the best alternative for a Democrat Victory

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:09:08 EDT

No More Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton in 08’: Obama the best alternative for a Democrat Victory

" If nominated for president, Hillary Clinton is likely to Loose in general Elections Vs. a Republican Candidate. Democrats, We are NOT ready for this Again !!! Let keep it together and rally for Barack Obama's nomination. (Please Read a new LA Times article. ** Franklin with the Obama campaign "Africans and Americans for Obama" group )

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Democrat in ’08 but not that one

Polls show voters support individual candidates—particularly Clinton—are another story--- By Michael Finnegan, LA Times Staff Writer, June 17, 2007

WASHINGTON — Frederick Cole wants the Democratic Party to take back the White House in 2008. "Look what a mess we're in," said Cole, a nurse in Louisville, Ky. "It's time for some fresh, new-thinker ideas." Yet if his party nominates Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York for president, the 52-year-old Democrat plans to vote for her Republican opponent. "It's a personal thing," Cole said. "I don't like her. I think she's condescending and arrogant, even worse than Al Gore, who has no personality."

It is a paradox of the 2008 presidential race. By a wide margin, several polls show, voters want a Democrat to win — yet when offered head-to-head contests of leading announced candidates, many switch allegiance to the Republican. In a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll conducted this month, this dynamic was most clearly evident with Clinton. When registered voters were asked which party they would like to win the White House, they preferred a Democrat over a Republican by 8 percentage points. But in a race pitting Clinton against former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, the Republican was favored by 10 percentage points.

Clinton's showing against Giuliani was the starkest example of how the general Democratic edge sometimes narrows or vanishes when voters are given specific candidates to choose between. The poll also showed Clinton trailing when matched against two other Republicans, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. The deficits, however, were within the survey's margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
These results, as well as follow-up interviews of poll respondents, reflect the array of difficulties that Clinton could face as the Democratic nominee.

Plenty of time remains for Clinton to temper resistance to her candidacy. But for now, her failure to match her party's generic advantage underscores the primacy of personal appeal in a presidential race, regardless of political context. "You give someone a name, and they automatically associate it with a specific set of pros and cons," said Dean Spiliotes, a political science professor at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire. "With a candidate as well-known as Hillary Clinton, that's going to cause some problems."

Conversations with a dozen Times/Bloomberg poll respondents, including Cole, exposed a number of those problems, above all a sour aftertaste from controversies of her White House years with President Clinton. "I just don't feel like she has the integrity to do the right thing," said retired service-station owner Richard James, 62, a Democrat who lives in Herriman, Utah.
James wants a Democrat to win in 2008; he sees President Bush's tenure as a "shipwreck" marked by cronyism and a botched war. Yet he would vote for Giuliani over Clinton. "He's got some honesty to him," James said.

To Carol Bendick, 63, a Democrat who lives in Danville, Ill., Bush is too cozy with the oil industry, and she, too, wants a Democrat to succeed him. But she would support Giuliani over Clinton. "Who wants four or eight more years of the Clintons' marital disputes, paid for by the United States, we the people? I certainly don't," said Bendick, a teacher on disability. Several men who prefer a Democrat for president, but not Clinton, said they were simply unwilling to support a woman.

Kevin Kidd, 45, a Democrat who owns a bar in Farwell, Mich., said a female president would make the United States "look a little wimpier." "Some countries have woman presidents, and I just think it makes them look weak," he added.

[published by La Times, June 18,2007]

"16 Votes For a Veto Override, a NO Vote to Bush, Now a National "Walk for Change"

Franklin Katunda — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:17:27 EDT

Dear Obama Supporters,

We are going forward to victory with the Obama movement, and I wanted every one to be certain about the fact, as we are running for "A year and half long campaign". This means enough time to really impact our country in a positive way and to bring about a change in politics, which is encompassing the economic development and improving the homeland security with border protection at home and new sound foreign policy. The last senator Obama's "NO" vote to funding Bush military action without any timetable just came in place to illustrate all we can hope from him before September 2008 coming up, when the general's Iraqi Progress will be evaluated, and eventually when the debates in Congress will resume on that matter. Senator showed a strong leadership, standing up Bush on a war campaign that he knows will not succeed. The now deal is to still gather those 16 votes in the Senate from Republicans to override an eventual Pres. Bush's veto. The New Hampshire's Republican senators' move and the last visit by Republican Lawmakers to the White House showed that change in the dynamics.

I have watched the presidential debates, got news feeds, i've chatted and blogged on many networks and have come to the conclusion that a few more Americans are still attached to the old way of doing politics, which in the opposite is not the "political line of conduct" of the Illinois Senator. It has sometimes hurt our campaign and our candidate to see the way the pundits, the News biases are being presented out to the American public, even it's sad to see some of our own fellow supporters giving up on their determination and choose sit back. All i know is that a year and half will be helpful to change the mentality of our politics. We will continue to see more and more media strategists talking on national TV networks, presenting very framed news stories in favor of Hillary or the next buzz, even though they know it's unethical to speak as a media news contributor to declare publicly your candidate's choice during a TV elections analysis.

With the Obama campaign, we have opted for grassroots organizing, this time, as the best way to go from the "Ground Up", while other candidates are going from "Officials Endorsements" to the bottom ??? Polls show Obama likely chosen over republicans and Independents, which to the opposite of the democrats is not real yet. Remember, democrats are behind in some critical judgements: Clinton is weak for the general elections, because if nominated she won't have any rep, independents and a lage democratic constituency. So, democrats, wake up !!! Guys, we have got to continue working on that momentum because it works and will help us gain both sides of voters, including the independents. All we need to focus on is to make sure that we keep this year 1/2 long grassroot's momentum going. It's the best way for us to get the most votes we can get from the Democrats, Republicans and Independents, and they all for the most OK with the Iraq troop's de-escalation.

The last grassroots action I use as a thermother is the "Manchester NH Canvass Kick-off" when we walked through the streets of MANCHESTER, knocking on doors, and that had payed us some TV unnoticed good results: " Senator Obama told NH voters on May 18th in Rye and later at the Kick-Off on the 19th that we need "16 votes to override the president's veto" and bring our troops home from Iraq". Canvassers and NH residents were told to call in and tell their senators; Judd Gregg and John Sununu to change their vote in favor of bringing the troops home.

Good results: Just last week, the two Republican Senators from NH made a promising move to tell the Administration (through their senate etiquette), to consider the bi-partican work-study group's report (Baker-Hamilton). Pressed by their constituents, they made a move to propose to Bush that plan he rejected, seeking an option for a troop withdrawal, presently in the harm's way.

Now i'm not sure every good political analyst can tell where that political pressure on NH senators' stance came from? The answer is clear I think: canvassers' efforts in the streets of NH and the long time "unexpressed" sentiment from NH residents played a big role to push lawmakers and other candidates to go along with a NO vote in order to TURN THE PAGE in favor of diplomacy and for a sustained Iraqi political consensus.

Sad thing, news networks NEVER made comments and missed to make a sound analysis about how the actions of the "Obama campaign" in NH and how we have inspired residents and even the state's only two Republican Senators to "timidly" step up on the issue. As always, media pundits and hyped TV political analysts spent more time, talking about candidates' hair cuts or about intimacy controversies. SAD to see this in America.

Neverthless, make no mistake, we are here to bring a change in politics and in the whole country, and we shall prevail !!! If you haven't signed up for an event "Walk for Change" in your town and vicinity, please go to events page on barackobama.com and put in you ZIP CODE in order to sign up today and attend an event, tommorow.

Remember May19th in NH was just a local state Kick Off... But I personnally anticipate that the June 9th's Event ( happening nationwide ) to be a NEVER SEEN-before in decades in the American polititics. Will you be part of it? If yes, you just have few more hours to do so online, and bring your friends and family to your local event.

Get any of these things with you: " OBAMA T-Shirts, OBAMA Buttons, OBAMA bumper stickers, OBAMA Signs anything that can show a great visibility, bring them with you at the event. Confortable shoes, water, snacks and drinks, etc. Also check the weather in your town to see if a raincoat or a jacket will be needed.

Fellow Americans, we are in the right path to victory in November 2008. Remember this friends, what ticked Hillary was that more than-150,000-Obama-Contributors were potentially ready to give more to campaign. She probably not know " ... these thousands of donators will become grassroots volunteers" What strikes the Republicans candidates right now more than just a " lightning sound" over a TV debate is the "frightening" thought that those same "150,000 Obama contributors" can still give the double of the money they pledged as of June 30th 2007. The truth is also known: these same numbers are increasing during Obama's meeting and fundraiser crowds, from the online donations and NOW the same people are involved in grassroots action.

Despite of some biased polls, fueling what is known to be a war <media/poll network reports vs. grassroots organizing effots > We are going to push an effective way to touch the hearts of the people during this campaign, will mobilize them for a change and earnestly win the White House in 2008. We better off having informed and engaged citizens in 2009 for a better change in the country.

Whatever we see around us right now, at the end of the day, I know that grassroots efforts always pay, because if you are a true community organizer, you know that the Obama momentum is the best organizing tool one can have for an effective canvass. The energizing message shared by Senator Obama alone speaks louder than any negative TV ads, and is better and effective than any biased-media analysis or framing comments journalists can articulate.

In Alexandria VA, I'm Franklin Katunda, and I a p p r o v e this message; because the concept of the "Grassroots Organizing and Media Used For Empowering the Communities..." is my expertise; my educational background, and I know it works.

[Blog written this Friday June 8th, 2007 in 9 Obama supporter groups ]

June 28th Luncheon with Michelle Obama in DC

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:07:45 EDT

Hello All - I am a co-chair on a luncheon with Michelle Obama on June 28th in DC. Tickets start at $250, and it will be a wonderful event and unique opportunity. Please email me at rmedavid@aol.com (please do not reply to the whole listserv) if you would like the invitation, and please excuse the double email if you belong to other groups I send to.

Thanks very much.

Ruthi David with"Families for Obama.org"

Email Source: group "Alexandria Virginia for Obama", and posted in 8 groups by Franklin Katunda

Last Saturday's Canvassing in Manchester NH

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 21 May 2007 08:12:01 EDT

Manchester, NH. May 19th 2007.

Having flown from Washington DC to Boston in order to go carpooling to Manchester NH, I asked myself what I was doing? Later during the day, I realized I had just taken a path experience many other Obama's campaign workers have decided to follow; from all over the country: Illinois, New York, Virginia and far more North Carolina. Illinois Senator Barack Obama (Democrat) drew about 550 canvassers in NH, according to the Politico web-media. An army of canvassers who went knocking door-to-door for the New Hampshire’s kick-off.

During that all-day long drizzly and cold Saturday, high 50s and lower temperatures 40s, an army of Obama’s staff workers and supporters swelled out into the streets of Manchester, a city where campaign officials inaugurated a flat size-Headquarters for Obama, in a building at 60 Rogers Street.

Senator Barack Obama, dressed very casual (a black weatherproof jacket) joined those who paid of their time to express their hopes and dreams with an Action. The introductory speech was a short exhortation to the crowd, calling them to hit the road and rally New Hampshire residents to sign a petition that will bring the war in Iraq to an end. Friday, the front-leading and popular democratic candidate told residents at a town hall in Rye NH that “Sununu, Gregg and 14 other Republican senators are the main roadblocks to ending the unpopular war in Iraq.” Obama backs a plan that would give the Democratic-controlled Congress more control over the war's finances and begin troop redeployment before President Bush leaves office, the Associated Press reported.

New Hampshire -a strong conservative bastion and hard-wearing primary caucus state has two republican senators Judd Gregg and John Sununu in the US Congress who voted for the war in Iraq, and "…we are 16 votes short from bringing this war to a close… One of the things that everybody has to do is to help generate those 16 votes” said Obama.

The question was long time asked: Who will get out and engage in a direct talk with NH frustrated voters, (some independents or republicans), undecided, those who feel betrayed by the way the politics worked out since the last presidential elections? Who will take a stand and back it up with a "field action" to let these America’s fore-voters that for a son or a nephew killed in Iraq, there is a chance to sign a “symbolic” petition in order to call on these 16 Republican US Senators to help Congress change the course in Iraq and “turn the page”?

The answer is that it takes a diverse army of determined-Obama supportes, from all racial and state backgrounds: Irish-Americans, Jews-Americans, African-Americans and Asian-Americans, arboring their colors, to take a day off and pay an unsolicited visit to one of the New England’s high toll population of mostly French/Canadian descent in order to get their petition’s signatures. It was clear that Manchester, at this stage of the primaries, is just a sample of a population with a tough stance when it comes to voting. Meanwhile, the American people in its majority (all political sides) undeniably recognize one fact: this was a mismanaged war, wrongly commenced with no coherent and strategic defense plan, with a basis of a false intelligence, an ill-conceived foreign policy that created an absence of relevant and reliable diplomacy.

I recall a great first experience as a canvasser: We rode the “bus”… A school bus from Boston, via the McIntyre Ski Area where Obama gave a speech; we headed to a local outlet marketplace's parking area, where each bus squad had split its riders, two by two, to go into the neighborhood. The talk with residents was lovely, brief to the point. Some residents were not ready for a "talk" nor to comment, because frustrated with the politics, some others had an appreciative smile and signed up on our petition clipboards....Even more and more pledged to significantly join the Senator's efforts, by signing a supporter's card.

View pictures, when Sen. Obama briefed canvasssers before the door-to-door operation, on FLICKr.com: Link

Later, in the day, we met up at the NH Obama Headquarters for lunch where a tasty barbecue was served to canvassers, a time we socialized with other volunteers and the NH campaign staff (people we only interacted with either online or by phone). What a great and fruit-bearing campaign we are experiencing with the help of the internet!!! Half of the crowd was made of students and young voters in general, while amazingly, several other hundreds were from the NH and neighbor states' older generation (-some canvassed before, in the past 25 years), and they brought energy and experience to what should be by now a common business to all Americans for a change in 08.

No more business as usual in our politics, was the message one would catch from this event: The canvassing efforts were a success because it wasn't about Senator Obama or its own agenda; The action in the field meant to rally engaged citizens in one hand and NH residents to voice up their opinions in ending the Iraq War, looking at the price in lives and funds our country pays for every day. The Manhester NH cavass day (May 19th 2007) was definetely about spotting on the will of the American people to demand accounts from their leadership. Senator Barack Obama made himself available to engage the world of primary-voters in such path-way.

- I’m Franklin Katunda, an Obama'08 Canvasser, and reporting from Manchester NH

OBAMA in DC: Please Sign up for the H2O Event, May 23rd

Franklin Katunda — Wed, 16 May 2007 20:43:08 EDT

A Message from Tobby (Please Read)

Hello fellow compatriots!I received a call last night from the Senator about how grateful and excited he is on our plan to host him at H20 this coming Wednesday. He informed me that we are all in this campaign not just to win, but to truly transformed our politics for the betterment of our generation and our country. After our discussion, I was certain that this campaign is not about him: he is in because of the passion and love he has for this great country. My fellow supporters of Obama, I want to relay his profound message of gratitude and appreciation to you all for committing your time and money to this great enterprise of reclaiming our country back. For those that have not bought the ticket to this event, please do so before Saturday. Your contribution is priceless and it will help in actualizing our shared dreams of achieving a more perfect union. Be part of a generation that actually bend the arc of justice to its rightful place. Be counted! It is now time for us to actually "turn the page" by participating in this one-for-lifetime fundraising with Senator Obama. It is official that Senator Barack Obama will be coming to H2O on May 23, 2007 for a fundraising event. This is a low-dollar and affordable fundraising event for all of us that are civically minded in changing Washington DC, from a trading post to place of solving our shared problems.

The minimum ticket price is $100 for regular attendees and $500 for a VIP pass It is a great opportunity for all of us supporters in the area to come out en mass to grace this august visitor. You will have the chance to shake hands, hear, question, take pictures and share the same stage with our noble, intelligent and next president of the United States, Senator Barack Obama. This event is similar to the one organized by the folks in New York in February, which the tickets were sold out within three days. Therefore, seize this opportunity to buy the ticket now before it will be sold out. CLICK HERE TO BUY THE TICKET.For any question, email me at tobbybonk@yahoo.com. NOTE: Pass on this mail to others who may be interested in attending this important fundraising event. It is going to be the only relatively cheaper fundraising event that the Senator will be in attendance.

Thank you,Tobby with the group "AFRICANS AND AMERICANS FOR OBAMA"Posted by Franklin Katunda

Why Donating for Obama 08' Today ?

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 12 May 2007 11:45:26 EDT

Hello, Friend

The United States of America is at the crossroads of his history. The upcoming 2008 presidential elections are the most important of the past 3 decades in shaping the future of American and the welfare of relationships among nations of the world. America needs a President that appeal to both the deep american traditioanl values and the "new generation" of politics in 2008. The USA desperatly needs a "humble" leader, a true visionary, a wise and courageous commander-in-chief; the one who is imparted with sound judgement and integrity.

Many people like me have spotted a candidate they see in Illinois Senator Barack Obama, so do I ask you to look into it. I'm here not asking you to blindly endorse him, directly, which I will leave you to your own judgement, but I would like to see men and women choosing him, beyond his skin color or (party) political background, but mostly for what he stands for, issues and ambitions he's been standing for, his position in major domestic issues and foreign policy.

Barack Obama not only focus in finding solutions to issues but he envisions ambitions that, for long time, the American people have looked at as impossible to realize. I personnaly am proud supporting him: I have recently conducted a house-event for Obama in Arlington Texas, last march 07 and the turn-out was encouranging to meet with 30 excited people who signed up and filled a friend's home for a 5 hour event.

More and more, Americans are anxious about bringing that change quickly, about ending the war in iraq, but most they are excited everywhere Sen. Obama goes or his name is mentioned to the idea that he will be the first african-american president of the United States of America.

This May 19th we will be on the way to New Hampshire to attend an event he will lead, canvassing door-to-door to speak to all-racial-background voters. Politics in America, as to what i see, is not about the race nor the gender anymore...It's about being the right candidate to connect to the american people and maximize their potential to be better themselves, and to answer their aspirations.

" In 2007, It takes more than before a "great" and right leader in the White House for a better and secure World" --- My quote.

The 2008 Elections is the best occasion to endorse a man that will get the USA out of the mess and redorn our colors, again. America cannot play down the negative consequences from bad foreign policy and the sentiment of hate it's increasingly encountering from its allies. You have a choice i'm offering here to support financially Senator Obama with 5$ or 50$, if you wish 100$ or 500$ as you can afford...any amount you can to help build Obama's movement for a reform in America and to keep its momentum.

I've created a 1,000 dollars yearly fundraising goal to support Barack Obama's presidential campaign. We have a secure website, barckobama.com where you can contribute (credit/debit of check) and be part of this rendez-vous.

Will you help me reach this goal? To see my personal page and make a donation, click on the following link here:

Remember, Senator Obama is the "greater" choice for this 08 elections, because he is genuine, wise, articulate and a leader with a positive state senatorial profile, community organizer, a civil rights lawyer. His background in the US Senate foreign relations committee and his stand on the Iraq War makes him a great alternative to cleaning up our failures and turn the page.

Thank you in advance!

Franklin Katunda

Campaign Administrator for groups
"AFRICANS AND AMERICANS FOR OBAMA"
"UMASS-BOSTON FOR OBAMA"

After Debate USA Survey Polls

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:30:45 EDT

Source: USA Survey done after debate at 9PM

Filtering: 1,250 South Carolina adults were interviewed by SurveyUSA immediately following tonight's 04/26/07 Presidential Debate among 8 candidates for the Democratic nomination. Of the 1,250 SC adults interviewed, 403 said they had listened to the debate and were included in this survey. Margin of sampling error among the 403 debate watchers is + / - 5.0%. Caution: The South Carolinians who watch a Democratic presidential debate 9 months from the SC Primary and 18 months from the General Election may not mirror the adult population of the United States. The perceived winner of a debate among 8 Democrats may or may not benefit from sustainable momentum.

Who won the debate?

6%Biden

24%Clinton

2%Dodd

14%Edwards

2%Gravel

3%Kucinich

31%Obama

4%Richardson

13%Not Sure

Who lost the debate?

8%Biden

12%Clinton

9%Dodd

5%Edwards

17%Gravel

10%Kucinich

9%Obama

9%Richardson

20%Not Sure

Good Job! Our Junior Senator is on the good start. DO NOT listen to the media pundits and frenzy commetators (MSNBC and their political analysts, contributors) who quickly (without any survey basis) started favoring Hillary Clinton following that night's debate. Even the MSNBC poll surveyed online (on the same night) showed Barack Obama leading with about 43% and Clinton 26%. See my yesterday blog...The truth is that the question many people thought Sen. Obama failed to respond on an eventual attack on two US cities, while he was evoking gathering intelligence to determine How and Who did it, first and working in alliance with the international community to haunt them down (a bad answer, according to MSNBC analysts... Pat Buchanan) was to the contrary in his favor, given the war the US is involved in and the need to efficient emergency prepardness and response to terrorist and tragedy in US, given past failures. H. Clinton had just given an answer that showed patterns of pre and post-911 Bush war decision, highlighted by a potential "invasion" in any country that harbor Al Qaeda. Again this terrorist network operatives are all over the world and operate an unconventional war, while they are "stateless" said another candidate among the eight present.

Wisdom, Leadership and Charisma is better than dynasty's experience in politics !!!

Way to go, Senator Obama!

Franklin

Responding to Terrorist Attacks on US as of today...

Franklin Katunda — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:56:00 EDT

Dear Friends,

Action is a word we can link to Hope, because we are carrying on a message presented by Senator Barack Obama. On the after-first MSNBC debate, last thursday, we feel a tremendous call to organize for a steadfast action and to explain to our neighbors, our friends, co-workers and classmates on what makes unique this race and the significance of the change: the reniewing the mind of the people of America to focus now on few good things that America knows to do, when it lacks the will to better do them.

We saw so many candidates speaking about what they CAN and WILL do if in the oval office. With respect to our position as Democrats, I know some democrats are not core responsible of the mess the Bush Administration has brought in Iraq. What we know is that our country has 3 powers, elected at their full potential, every electoral term (the executive branch, congress and the supreme court) and that means: Experience and Name Recognition for most 15 years-experienced politicians who are today's candidates. What Congress (with the Republican majority) has done to rally democrats to authorize the war, CAN and SHOULD be used today by Dems to rally Republicans to get out of Iraq.

What I know is that Sen. Clinton, fmr sen. Edwards and many other voted for the war. There are just a few senators and politicians who can clearly rally both sides on the aisle for the sake of America. That's what I called knowing what's good to do but refusing to do so (in the name of party colors' pride...)

What I also know is that rep. Kucinic (in house), Sen. Obama (state senator then), Gov. Bill Richardson among other candidates, have condemned it. What I am asking myself is to know if there is anybody out there in Congress (... and candidate for 08 elections) who is more "reliable" to reaching both parties in order to push the Bush Administration to sign the bill he has promised to veto? I know just a few... With all respect due to our 8 candidates, I see and the records tell it: Senators Joe Biden and Barack Obama are both the only candidates with a strong touch to use their skills and to speak to both sides of the aisle. Gov Bill Richardson is a good Senate's outsider too in that matter.

Genuinly with wisdom and charisma, Senator Obama, D Illinois have excelled in that job in his so called "short term" US Congress profile, and his many years in the Illinois State Senate and as a Civil Rights Lawyer and Constitutional Scholar. Also mush of it comes in with his Foreign Relations Committee's profile... because he can build a strong consensus to gaining more votes from the Republicans, the "undeclared" anti-war and he can easely put together these stakes with the Dems to safely bring our troops home and restore our image.

I KNOW that Sen. Obama is for a funding of the war with a clear withdrawal plan and a clear set-up timetable. America will gain more by keeping in mind that a withdrawal of our troops won't be successful if we proceed without preparing a safe (equipping of our troops with equipments they need to hold this phase of the war, to bolster the Al Maliki's government to take control and responsibility in meeting the benchmarks, and to helping Iraq and the region's stability, using diplomacy on the post-Iraq war. A president who would be enganging in alliances and in bilateral regional talks to secure America's withdrawal and to strenghten our Homeland security as of a result.

The next president, obviousely, would have in mind to be knowledgeable and also be wise, avoiding the sensationals and the temptations to quickly answer questions that deal with the Al Qaeda "notion". Well, we wached it when answering to a MSNBC 90 minutes debate question to know what a hopeful candidate ( as President) would do if 2 cities were hit in America, Sen. Hillary Clinton went on and said: Swiftly and as prudently...we will retaliate. Good, say Pat Buchanan and other TV commentators in love with the frenzy hot statements, well calculated and rehearsed as in usual "campaign" speeches, but they are far from reality.

I personally have a problem with that : It reminds me what Bush just did in "retaliation" while responding to the post-911 tragedy; he diverted the US efforts from the real intelligence reports to a bogus one. FYI...Going after the nations that backed Al qaeda (in April 2007) is a "vague" and most "imprudent" answer, about these "people who can blow themselves up anywhere at any time".... because Al Qaeda has no pre-established country of harbor and a nation to go after per se.

If we look at this terrorist network's phenomenon closely, retaliating would mean attacking more than just Afghanistan, Pakistan to push more the idea; it means attacking countries in Europe, in Africa and even North America, including where Al qaeda is known to have mingled its operatives.

So, Hillary Clinton would not quiet be resolving the issue, giving the current circumstances, because as Joe biden said: ... the war on terror is "not" a conventional one , ALQAEDA is stateless... It's a concept the current executives and some other fellows miss to look at carefully; This is the reason why the administration got confused with Afghanistan, Pakistan and than Iraq deals; Partially, this is why we are struggling to engage with N-Korea, Iran, Syria with wisdom and by ways of diplomacy.

Sen. Barack Obama pointed out at few elements but major ones both former mayor Giuliani and NY senator Clinton were surprised with on sept. 2001, just like during Katrina, while their constituency got hit in the New York's attacks: Emergency Prepardness and Response had "terribly" lacked to our shame (we even declined/ mishandled some offers for help from foreign countries).

Second, you cannot deal with Al Qaeda without gazing into the Intelligence to determine who and how they did it. Than the right answer is to tell if retaliating will include engaging America into another war battlefield? Clinton's position and answer has shown, once again, patterns that we have experienced in the Bush cabinet's last decision to go to war, and the decision Congress (including Clinton's) had agreed to authorize, in deed a decision initiated by Cheney-Rumsfeld-Rove triumvirat, and excluding Rice (diplomacy) in the fight against terrorism.

Besides the pundits and all the media frenzy alerts around it, it's NOT the best answer, given the today's (april 2007) circumstances, our nation -the US of America finds itself in.

Senator Obama also pointed at the importance of working with the International Community to strenghtening our world's leadership (which we lost) in dealing with terrorism. What America has failed to recognize and the conservatives leaders are "champions" about, is the lessons from vietnam, pearl harbor, iraq and even somalia. It seems like they have NEVER taught some of us enough (including those running for office and current officials) to exploit the streinghts of diplomatic principles in our foreign policy. Guess what? Switzerland, Germany, Japan... just to name a few that have built great and strong alliances with the world's partners without being conflicting all the time or enganging in unecessary wars ??? Former Senator Gravel was rigth about "Nuke's proliferation" I mean America's leadership is now becoming questionable around the world on the subject... Anyways, that's not the debate right now!

We need, without looking at the sensationals and pundits or how good sounds an answer to a debate's question to begin seeking a president who will ally (in reality) both wisdom to pragmatism. A president who will connect the dots between what we wrongly perceive as the American "patriotism" Vs. the Realities of International Relations today... Promoting the Leadership-role of the United States of America in the world versus just Imposing our, sometimes wrongly conceived, US foreign Policy in our bi-lateral relations with the world's nations.

Barack Obama has given an answer that can help to hold attackers identifiable and so, we can (at this present time, while we are facing Iraq) not engage in another mistake (war) the terorists have promised to be dragging us into (Bin-Laden said it...) They also know about our "blind" patriotism with strings attached keeping eyes in lobbyists contacts and interests rather than for a clear agenda. The democrats' rhetoric of opposing and whining later... I don't think is what we need to boot the republicans off the 2008 race. Hillary Clinton's answer (old-school-like) can please, off course, some Republicans, some of the old-school Dems who want to sound as "tough" in the Oval Office and also the undecided ...I'm sure she will be attacked by republicans on it if she was ever nominated. But profoundly, the right person is needed in the White House for the sake of a safer America, less "arrogant", a true leader in the world, wise and diplomatic, and leading America to show exemple by coaching other nations.

-- I'm Franklin Katunda
Groups' Administrator.

Obama's Podcasts to Rally more Voters...

Franklin Katunda — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:58:42 EDT

Dear Obama's Friends,

I'm on my way this Friday 30th (tomorrow) to DFW, for a March 31's House-Event for Obama. This event will be held at a friend's house in Arlington TX. I'm inviting those who would be in the neighborhood or who can recommend some friends and send them our way.

Also, I just thought these podcasts in the link below were good for personal knowledge as well as to be shared with other potential voters out there. They can be downloaded as Audio elements on your personal Ipods, MP players Computers and CDroms...or they can be sent by cellphones.

Enjoy the following Link, lets get busy and get to work!!!

IF NOT REDIRECTED PLZ COPY AND PAST THIS LINK: HTTP://OBAMA.SENATE.GOV/PODCAST/

Franklin Katunda
Group's Admin. for
AFRICANS AND AMERICANS FOR OBAMA.

Member of "The Students for Barack Obama", "Umass-Boston Class of 2006 for Obama"

SELMA 2007, a Prelude to a 2008 Victory !!!

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:56:30 EST

Yep, Fellow Dems, Americans everywhere,

Senator Obama proved wrong those who argued he was not "black enough", by showing the struggle his gran'parents underwent in mother land Africa, under the British tyrany (which by the way, most black african countries are still going through)... Sen. Obama is the generation of those born in 1960's era when Selma and similar experiences had helped us open a door to many "oppressed" countries inspired by the rise of the civil rights movement in US;

Questioning the blackness of someone like Barack Obama is denying the content of Dr King's speech because this speaks to the American Dream, an opportunity given to his father (a student on a US scholarship, like a few blacks back then, and nationwide) to give birth to an African-American, with a not lesser "black"-american background than any other American boy who ressembles him.

Look, Obama became a Civil Rights lawyer for a reason, Harvard-educated and Law Student Review's Editor/president for a purpose and today US senator, prelude to an historical Presidential Candidacy to connect the dots of principles this country is founded upon. I see it, I smell it, I can feel it.

I wish more and more Black folks amd the American people can understand the depth of his sincerity and the sense of the American Pride Barack Obama carries in him through his speech which transcends above cultural backgrounds to see a candidate ( only by the content of his character rather than the color of his skin)

I enjoyed a speech among his many ones when they portray a combination of Dr King Jr and JF Kennedy (in their rhetoric style, tone of voice, and compassion)...I just love him when he said during the Illinois kick off : " We are going to take it the government back (...) when they sign you a check and you get stuck with the bill"

He's the man America needs to heal, to recover, and to unite efforts from its people (all walkes of life, racial backgrounds), all together to meet the challenge of rebuilding hopes and dreams of the people.

Obama is a leader that is ready to lead us in this challenging era for the "New Majority" (formely called minorities) to lead America. It will take only 10% of audacity from all the "Joshuas" to complete on the 90% of work done by our predecessors (Civil Rights Activists) in Selma and elsewhere. That's the message I got from Barack Obama's Selma speech.

And the prophecies of Dr Martin Luther King Jr are coming to pass: " Let freedom ring from everywhere...when in one day in America children of blacks and whites will play together" These days are NOW... "Uncle Pooky get out and go to vote!"

Let the one who has ears, hears what the spirit says today. -- Franklin with "AFRICANS AND AMERICANS FOR OBAMA"

Senator Clinton to resuscitate a two decades of failed " US foreign Policy"

Franklin Katunda — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:30:07 EST

Fellow Dems, Dear Americans,

Unbelievable, It's on the News ....

Senator Hillary Clinton, responding to a question about the impact and how "controversial" will her husband's persona play in her politics, said and I quote the San Francisco Chronicles:

"In response to a question from the audience, she called her husband "the most popular person in the world right now'' and said that when she reaches the White House, "I will continue the tradition of using former presidents" as diplomats around the world..."

WOW....Obviousely, these people don't understand that, though it's a tradition for former presidents to play that role, but.... In this "Obama's Era", those dynastical tactics or aristocratic diplomaty won't count anymore given not only the deception they have left the american people with, but also the whole international community in which every single country in the world remembers their less "applaused" past deeds.

Sen. Clinton basically wants to have her husband, in the next 2008 term, to "overshadow" her next appointee for secretary of state, in critical tasks such as the "hot" diplomatic shell to tackle named: "Iran-Iraq-Syria-North Korea-Lebanon-Israel-Sudan/Darfur-DRCongo-Venezuela..."

She is invoking a "family thing" in the White House...business as usual, because it's supposedly done 'per tradition' Well, we all see Condi trying to do something about multiplying diplomatic strategies, while rugs have been pulled from under her feets by her "overshadower"... the diplomatically less compentent vice-president Dick Cheney!

Folks, lets be bold enough in this 2008 presidential elections to show them that America is not ready for and won't endorse a "BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-CLINTON" two decades dynasty again !!!!

Yesterday, 1) "Father" Bush was the one who incited animosity from arab countries against America, 2) Husband Clniton failed to mobilize sound intelligence to crack down terrorists, prelude to 911... 3) "Son" Bush determined to continue a family's war legacy is hiped up by a real human hunter Dick Cheney... 4) After more than two decades of failures in "their" US foreign policies... Now, "Wife" Clinton wants to come back on the political scene to... resuscitate all of the above.

Non M'am, no more BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-CLINTON "redundant"-like leadership in the White House for 2008!

Thank you all, God Bless (Barack) America!

ps: barack comes from "baraka" in swahili language, meaning "To Bless"

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY "YEAH"

Franklin Katunda — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:09:10 EST

Hey Fellow Dems, fellow Americans.

This is a unique occasion we have, after the Bush administration failure, misleading Congress and the country in to a war that diverted us from the real "war on terror" against Bin Laden. It's an opportunity to take this governement back and make it available to the American people. It does not matter if some skeptical black folks still don't believe it, even if some in the meanstream think it's too early.

We are going to raise the standard of the New Majority during this 2008 race; A birth of the new majority with NO racial consideration. We are making history, building a "New America" where, ... children of whites and blacks are playing together already, as prophetically seen by Dr Martin Luther King Jr. It is sad that some Americans haven't realize that we are living the dreams of the world's most known civil rights leader, Dr king Jr.

Neverthless, I am happy that millions of Americans like me can believe and salute this prelude to a new era in the American politics led by a "New Majority", formely known as minorities...Brothers and sisters, fellow Americans, regardless of your nationality (Africans, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Native-Americans, Latino-Americans or Caucasians), this is the time for the "New Majority" to lead and to unite this great nation for the its own good, its prosperity and for its security and the welfare of other countries in the world.

Let's get involved, RAISE some funds for our junior senator, spreadthe word about our next president, now all together and unto Victory in 2008!!!

And All those in favor say Yeah.

-- Franklin Katunda, from Boston Mass, currently in Lorton VA

Remembering the UMASS Class of 2006 Commencement Day!

Franklin Katunda — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:35:52 EST

Remembering the UMASS Class of 2006 Commencement Day!

UMASS-Boston- The Harbor Point. [By Franklin Katunda for Congoboston.com]

A “Pompous” Academic Procession and Opening (executed with the Pompous Circumstance Hymn…A Very “Insightful” Speech by Senator Barack Obama

The 38th enjoyable University of Massachusetts Commencement took place, June 2, 2006, on the Campus Lawn. The academic formal procedure went well although some feared-thunderstorms forecasted few days before. More than Ten Thousands people: graduates, university faculty, parents, family, friends and guests showed up for a ceremony that, officially, started at 10 AM with the all seven colleges and institute candidates for an academic procession, and went on until 2:30 in the afternoon.

Following the procession, from the University building to the Campus Center lawn, in which marched in honor, graduates, professors, the university leadership, Senator Barack Obama and other honorary degrees recipients, the reverend Adrienne Berry-Burton prayed in opening to invocate God with a Song: “Great is Thy Faithfulness” and a prayer of praise in one among Boston’s public colleges. 1999 Music major and Umass-Boston Alumna, who once was a Boston Pops Soloist, Ms. Chrsitina DeVaughn intoned the National Anthem.

Chancellor Michael Collins, MD congratulated, on the behalf of the board of trustees and the University of Massachusetts-Boston, more than 2,535 graduates, part of the 2006 Class (Certificates, Bachelors, Masters and Doctors’ Degrees). US senator Barack Obama, D Illinois (The man from the 2004 DNC at the Boston’s Fleet Center), once again demonstrated he was a good choice among many sought after speakers to address the University’s community and guests, when he delivered a very much insightful commencement’s speech. Senator Obama of Illinois received a Umass-Boston’s Doctor of Laws Degree for… “ Advancing and Protecting the Interests of the Less Fortunate, for his Adherence to a Political Credo that Transcends both Party and Race, and for his Thoughtful and Farsighted Contribution to the Nation’s Principal Lawmaking Body”. –An official commentary extracted from the UMB’s commencement brochure and website.

University of Massachusetts at Boston 2006 Commencement Address

“ More than half of you represent the very first member of your family to ever attend college. In the most diverse university in all of New England, I look out at a sea of faces that are African-American and Hispanic-American and Asian-American and Arab-American” noted US Senator Obama. . And to add “I see students that have come here from over 100 different countries, believing like those first settlers that they too could find a home in this City on a Hill – that they too could find success in this unlikeliest of places” The well-read Harvard educated-senator exhorted degree’s recipients to look forward with courage, determination, and to not be afraid to take the risk.

“ My second piece of advice is to stay global. As the world continues to change and we become more connected to each other, globalization will bring both benefits and disruptions to our lives. But either way, it’s here, and it’s not going away.” Said Sen. Obama to a crowd of about ten thousands students, faculty members, family and friends.

As a last piece of advice, Senator Obama said, is “…To stay amazed – to remain in wonder at this unlikely place we call “America”. I think it’s easy for some people to look at all the challenges we face; to look at poverty and war and racism and inequality and hatred and helplessness, and to get down on this country as a result – to think that there’s something wrong with us – that there is little hope to make things better” “And if you ever feel like that yourselves, I ask you to remember all the amazing and unlikely things that have happened in this country. This country where a young man from Illinois who failed at so many of the business and political ventures he attempted still went on to become the president who freed a people and saved a union. This country where a young black minister from Georgia who had nothing but a dream in his heart went on to lead his people to the promised land of civil rights and voting rights.”

An Academic Achievement Award to Ms. Reyes and Diplomas to Graduates

Umass-Boston Biochemistry major Catherine Reyes was honored among thousands with a John F. Kennedy Award for Academic Achievement, and before she delivered the student body’s remarks. A native of Colombia who immigrated to Massachusetts in 2000, gave a poignant speech to the audience, lecturing all of us about how a great contribution from immigrants are making to America, being the strength the whole Nation draws from its diversity. “At UMass Boston, we are an incredibly diverse group of undergraduate and graduate students, faculty and staff,” Reyes said. “Undoubtedly this coming together of people from so many different backgrounds has been a strength of our educational experience. Just as it is a source of strength for this university, it is also a source of strength for our country.” She said.

After the ceremony, break out sessions for remitting of diplomas to newly graduates were held for Liberal Arts, Management, Nursing and Health Sciences, Public and Community Service, Science and Mathematics, Education and the John McCormack Graduate School of Public Policy students at several locations throughout the Harbor Point's Campus, featuring the majestious "JFK library" along the ocean's bank. The following students are a few among thousands of the Class of 2006 faces whose names I can still remember… Those I attended with the most prestigious Public University, located in an Incredible Historical and Urban Setting; University of Massachusetts at Boston: Students are Mayimputu Masamuna, Management; Diana Watler, Human Services; Meghan Doran, Community Planning; Gisele Beya, Management; Carolyn Brwon, Human Services; Brad Stoler, Community Planning; William Bumpus, Labor Studies; Franklin Katunda, Community Planning; Sarah Colomba, Human Services; Chrity Tarantino, Labor Studies; Sarah McLennan, Human Services; Jason Pramas, Community Media and Technology; Malgorzata Slezak, Human Services; Shaumba Yandje Dibinga, Africana Studies; Nancy Bradley Capasso, Community Planning; Gerasimos Antzoulatos, Legal Education.

Congratulations to All Umass-BostonGraduates from the Class of 2006, and please join thousands in this business!!! Let us Support, Donate for, Rally for and Elect US Senator Barack Obama, the next occupant of the White House in 2008!!

A commentary by Franklin Katunda, 2006 Alumnus

* Online-Moderator for the group “UMASS Class of 2006 For OBAMA”

This article was written and web-published in June 2006 for Congoboston.com (c) June 2006.

[BLOG POSTED Feb.17, 2007]