http://www.legitgov.org/ Citizens For Legitimate Government
GOP SEES CHANCE OF STEALING ELECTION SLIPPING AWAY
"We are running out of smear ideas and ideas for voter suppression," said Karl Rove. "What we are the most afraid of, is that the next president of the United States will actually be a man who, I shudder to think of this, a man who actually won the election."
Satire by R J Shulman WASHINGTON – (PTSD News) – As polls indicate that Senator Barack Obama is slowly pulling away from rival John McCain, Republican leaders are concerned they will not be able to steal the election. "We project that we can overcome up to seven points of an actual Obama lead with the strategy we have in place," said Winthrop Downing of the Republican National Committee.
Downing told the Post Times Sun Dispatch that this strategy, named Operation American Freedom, which was used successfully in 2000 in Florida and in 2004 in Ohio, uses shock and awe to disorient the opponent. "While black box tampering, challenging student, black and recently foreclosed voters, generic voter intimidation and voter roll purges have proven successful in the past," Downing said, "we may not be able to prevail if Obama gets more than 54 percent of the vote."
"We were hoping the relentless personal attacks on Obama, you know, that he is an angry black Muslin intent on teaching sex to your kindergartner, would soften up his numbers enough for us to be in reach of pulling the victory from him, but he as been bobbing and weaving like Muhammad Ali on steroids," said Barbara White, a GOP strategist.
"We did make some progress when we tricked the media into covering the ACORN story thinking it was about real voter fraud," White said. "Of course, no one with those wild names will show up to actually vote, but media focus on ACORN allows us to challenge more legitimate voters. More importantly, while the media is swarming all over the little acorn, the mighty tree of GOP vote stealing will go unnoticed, even though it will cost more than 3 million Democrat votes."
Polls in several key swing states are now showing an increased lead for Obama. "We just needed that old fool McCain to keep it close enough," said a GOP staffer who wished to remain anonymous, "but he seems to be losing it. Just yesterday he got so mixed up at a rally he told a crowd in western Pennsylvania that he agreed with Obama that they were a bunch of angry rednecks. And Palin? A moose would be more qualified to be veep."
24 October 2008
Visit R J Shulman on MySpace
The Albuquerque Journal North devoted almost half a page to reproduce life-sizeon Saturday's edition our NEW MEXICO SUN NEWS cover with the Headline, "Obama Wins!"
Caption: Going out on a limb, the left-leaning New Mexico Sun News---a free twice-monthly paper published in Santa Fe---proclaimed "Obama Wins!" on the cover of its Firday edition. The headline is "kind of a journalistic stunt," and the paper's way of endorsing Barack Obama for Presidents, Contributing Editor Stephen Fox said. With the Chicago Daily Tribune's infamous "Dewey Defeats Truman" 1948 headline in mind, is the Sun News worried about jinxing obama? "No, said Editor Jerry Greenker. "I'm not a very superstitious guy."
"OBAMA WINS!" First American Newspaper with this Headline, 11 days before Election Day: Our Endorsement for the New Mexico Sun News
ALSO AT: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephenfox/gGgfHy
This was the front cover of Friday's edition of the New Mexico Sun News, circulation 11,000, Northern and Central New Mexico.
This was the idea of the Managing Editor, Jerry Greenker, kind of as a declaration of our own support, our own way of endorsing OBAMA, kind of as an affirmation, kind of a doctoral thesis in Political Journalism, kind of a journalistic stunt, and kind of the reason that people are driven to write science fiction, to see which of their predictions actually come true!
Since I had been scrutinizing through some of the best reading in my life, the newspaper endorsements for Obama from all over the United States, I had a plan to publish as much as would be allowed in a 32 page twice monthly local and alternative newspaper. This fit in well with Jerry's Idea, so we went for it, and are happy to share this with mybarackobama.com readers.
Respectfully,
Stephen Fox, Contributing Editor New Mexico Sun News Founder, New Millennium Fine Art stephen@santafefineart.com 505 983-2002
This is being printed and rolling off the presses, as I write this, on the front cover of Friday's edition of the New Mexico Sun News, circulation 10,000, Northern and Central New Mexico.This was the idea of the Managing Editor, Jerry Greenker, kind of as a declaration of our own support, our own way of endorsing OBAMA, kind of as an affirmation, kind of a doctoral thesis in Political Journalistm, kind of a journalistic stunt, and kind of the reason that people are driven to write science fiction, to see which of their predictions actually come true!Since I had been scrutinizing through some of the best reading in my life, the newspaper endorsements for Obama from all over the United States, I had a plan to publish as much as would be allowed in a 32 page twice monthly local and alternative newspaper. This fit in well with Jerry's Idea, so we are going for it, and are happy to share this with mybarackobama.com readers, the most open and most creative true political forum in the United States.Jerry put it this way in his page 2 story:"The New Mexico Sun News proudly and confidently declares Barack Obama to be the 44th President of the United States....this declaration comes from Santa Fe, NM, via a local, biweekly newspaper 11 days before Election Day. It is based on extensive research, an analysis of all of the editorial pages in America, "gut feelings," and the need for the American people to have closure and certainty about something in their lives. Also, our next issue comes out 3 days after the Nov. 4 election. So if we wanted to be first, we had to be bold."______________________endorsement issue theme story, New Mexico Sun News:"Editorial Page Avalanche for Obama Will Lead to Electoral College Landslide" by Stephen Fox[I believe this will be the first in the nation, over trepidations from some that this would be like Truman holding the Chicago Tribune printed the night before that 'DEWEY WINS!' when he hadn't won....Well, that's the way it is when you are ahead of the curve, and we wanted to get it out of the way for our readers by letting them know where we stood, well in advance of election day. For months, I have been coordinating, coaching, and doing free editing to help Obama supporters in every state write letters to the Editor and longer Opinion Editorials; to see this latest and on-going deluge of endorsements reaffirms my faith both in independent and discerning American Editorial Pages and the strength of my tactics, but above all, the intelligence, compassion, and coolness of our best candidate, Obama, who has convinced hundreds of millions of American he is the right choice now! - Recent newspaper endorsements of Obama, selected for the quality of their writing and the depths of their insights. Stephen Fox, Contributing Editor New Mexico Sun News]starting with the Washington Post: Barack Obama for President "THE NOMINATING process this year produced two unusually talented and qualified presidential candidates. There are few public figures we have respected more over the years than Sen. John McCain. Yet it is without ambivalence that we endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president. The choice is made easy in part by Mr. McCain's disappointing campaign, above all his irresponsible selection of a running mate who is not ready to be president. It is made easy in larger part, though, because of our admiration for Mr. Obama and the impressive qualities he has shown during this long race. Yes, we have reservations and concerns, almost inevitably, given Mr. Obama's relatively brief experience in national politics. But we also have enormous hopes......"----Washington Post EditorialThe text of the endorsements have all appeared in my 6 prior posted articles at OpEdNews, and here is a list of them for easier access:OpEdNews has been the site of choice to post the growing list of major and minor newspaper endorsements for Obama. The Editorials are quoted generally in full, with interspliced commentaries from major editors and commentators, explaining what is behind the Editorials. Part I Obama's Editorial Endorsements: including Washington Post, Fidel Castro, Richard Lugar, Chuck Hagel, & more! http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-s-Endorsements-The-by-Stephen-Fox-081016-633.html ******* Part II Editorial Page Endorsements of Obama Denver Post, Chicago Tribune, San Francsico Chronicle, Los Angeles Times
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Editorial-Page-Endorsement-by-Stephen-Fox-081017-544.html ******** Part III New Endorsements: Salt Lake City Tribune, Bangor and Brunswick, Maine, Philadelphia, Miami, Portland, Kansas Cityhttp://www.opednews.com/articles/EndorspLements-Salt-Lake-Ci-by-Stephen-Fox-081018-476.html ******** More Obama Endorsements IV: Sacramento, Katie Couric, Malaysia, Houston Chronicle, Detroit, Waco Tx (sort of) http://www.opednews.com/articles/More-Obama-Endorsements-IV-by-Stephen-Fox-081019-492.html *********Endorsements 5: Cleveland, Austin, St.Pete, Gainesville, Tuscaloosa, Orlando http://www.opednews.com/articles/ENDORSEMENTS-5-Cleveland-by-Stephen-Fox-081019-341.html *********ENDORSEMENTS 6: College Station, New Haven, San Antonio, Columbus, Las Vegas, Lexington KY http://www.opednews.com/articles/ENDORSEMENTS-6-College-St-by-Stephen-Fox-081020-511.html If your time permits, please TAKE THE TIME TO COMMENT AND SHARE YOUR INSIGHTS, which become a vital part of a larger on-going dialogue. Thank you, AND ON TO VICTORY! Stephen Fox Founder, New Millennium Fine Art Contributing Editor New Millennium Fine Art Santa Fe,NM (505)983-2002Jerry Greenker, Managing Editor New Mexico Sun News (505) 603-8968
There's still time to win Montana's Editorial Pages: Please use this list at usnpl.com; OpEdNews Compendium of Major Endorsements Thus Far
Taken from this "LIVE URL":
http://www.usnpl.com/mtnews.phphttp://www.usnpl.com/mtnews.php
Newspapers Click ( A ) for Newspaper address Click ( C ) for County summary Belgrade Belgrade News (A) (C) Bigfork Bigfork Eagle (A) (C) Billings Billings Gazette (A) (C) Billings The Billings Outpost (A) (C) Bozeman Bozeman Daily Chronicle (A) (C) Browning Glacier Reporter (A) (C) Butte The Montana Standard (A) (C) Chester Liberty County Times (A) (C) Choteau Choteau Acantha (A) (C) Columbia Falls Hungry Horse News (A) (C) Conrad The Independent-Observer (A) (C) Cut Bank Cut Bank Pioneer Press (A) (C) Eureka Tobacco Valley News (A) (C) Glasgow Glasgow Courier (A) (C) Great Falls Great Falls Tribune (A) (C) Hamilton Ravalli Republic (A) (C) Havre Havre Daily News (A) (C) Helena Helena Independent (A) (C) Helena Queen City News (A) (C) Huson Clark Fork Chronicle (A) (C) Kalispell Flathead Beacon (A) (C) Kalispell The Daily Inter Lake (A) (C) Laurel Laurel Outlook (A) (C) Lewistown Lewistown News-Argus (A) (C) Libby The Western News (A) (C) Livingston Livingston Enterprise (A) (C) Miles City Miles City Star (A) (C) Missoula Missoula Independent (A) (C) Missoula Missoulian (A) (C) Pablo Char-Koosta News (A) (C) Plains The Veterans Voice of MT (A) (C) Red Lodge Carbon County News Online (A) (C) Shelby The Shelby Promoter (A) (C) Sidney Sidney Herald-Leader (A) (C) Stevensville The Bitterroot Star (A) (C) Townsend Townsend Star (A) (C) West Yellowstone West Yellowstone News (A) (C) Whitefish Whitefish Pilot (A) (C) Wolf Point The Herald-News (A) (C) College Newspapers Univ of Montana Montana Kaimin
Editorial Page Victories clarify: Obama will win 2-1 in Electoral College! 4 part compendium---
Endorsements at OpEdNews: Washington Post, Houston, Detroit, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Chicago, Salt Lake, Philadelphia, Portland, Bangor, Sacramento, Kansas City (4 former Red States)
OpEdNews has been the site of choice to post the growing list of major and minor newspaper endorsements for Obama. The Editorials are quoted generally in full, with interspliced commentaries from major editors and commentators, explaining what is behind the Editorials.
Part I Obama's Editorial Endorsements: including Washington Post, Fidel Castro, Richard Lugar, Chuck Hagel, & more!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-s-Endorsements-The-by-Stephen-Fox-081016-633.html
*******
Part II Editorial Page Endorsements of Obama Denver Post, Chicago Tribune, San Francsico Chronicle, Los Angeles Times
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Editorial-Page-Endorsement-by-Stephen-Fox-081017-544.html
********
Part III New Endorsements: Salt Lake City Tribune, Bangor and Brunswick, Maine, Philadelphia, Miami, Portland, Kansas City
http://www.opednews.com/articles/EndorspLements-Salt-Lake-Ci-by-Stephen-Fox-081018-476.html
More Obama Endorsements IV: Sacramento, Katie Couric, Malaysia, Houston Chronicle, Detroit, Waco Tx (sort of)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/More-Obama-Endorsements-IV-by-Stephen-Fox-081019-492.html
TAKE THE TIME TO COMMENT AND SHARE YOUR INSIGHTS, which become a vital part of a larger on-going dialogue.
Thank you, Stephen Fox Founder, New Millennium Fine Art Contributing Editor New Millennium Fine Art Santa Fe, NM
There's still time to win Missouri's Editorial Pages: Please use this list at usnpl.com; OpEdNews Compendium of Major Endorsements Thus Far
taken from this "LIVE URL": http://www.usnpl.com/monews.php
Newspapers Click ( A ) for Newspaper address Click ( C ) for County summary Ashland Boone County Journal (A) (C) Bethany Republican-Clipper (A) (C) Bolivar Bolivar Herald-Free Press (A) (C) Boonville Daily News (A) (C) Bowling Green Bowling Green Times (A) (C) Branson Branson Courier (A) (C) Branson The Branson News (A) (C) Brookfield Linn County Leader (A) (C) Buffalo Buffalo Reflex (A) (C) California California Democrat (A) (C) Camdenton Lake Sun Leader (A) (C) Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian (A) (C) Carthage The Carthage Press (A) (C) Caruthersville Democrat Argus (A) (C) Chillicothe Constitution-Tribune (A) (C) Columbia Columbia Daily Tribune (A) (C) Columbia Columbia Missourian (A) (C) Cuba Cuba Free Press (A) (C) Dexter The Daily Statesman (A) (C) El Dorado Springs El Dorado Springs Sun (A) (C) Eldon Eldon Advertiser (A) (C) Eldon Vernon Publishing Newspapers (A) (C) Ellisville WestNews Magazine (A) (C) Elsberry Elsberry Democrat (A) (C) Eminence Shannon County Current Wave (A) (C) Fulton Fulton Sun (A) (C) Gainesville Ozark County Times (A) (C) Gallatin Gallatin North Missourian (A) (C) Gladstone Dispatch Tribune (A) (C) Hamilton Caldwell County News (A) (C) Hannibal Hannibal Courier-Post (A) (C) Harrisonville Democrat-Missourian (A) (C) Hermann Hermann Advertiser Courier (A) (C) Houston Houston Herald (A) (C) Independence The Examiner (A) (C) Jackson Cash-Book Journal (A) (C) Jamesport Tri-County Weekly (A) (C) Jefferson City Jefferson City News Tribune (A) (C) Joplin Joplin Business Journal (A) (C) Joplin Joplin Globe (A) (C) Joplin Joplin Independent (A) (C) Kansas City Business Journal (A) (C) Kansas City Kansas City Star (A) (C) Kansas City PitchWeekly (A) (C) Kennett Daily Dunklin Democrat (A) (C) Kirksville Daily Express (A) (C) Lamar Lamar Democrat (A) (C) Laurie Highway Five Beacon (A) (C) Lebanon Lebanon Daily Record (A) (C) Lees Summit Lee's Summit Journal (A) (C) Louisiana Louisiana Press Journal (A) (C) Macon Chronicle-Herald (A) (C) Marshall The Marshall Democrat-News (A) (C) Marshfield Marshfield Mail (A) (C) Maryville Nodaway News Leader (A) (C) Memphis Memphis Democrat (A) (C) Mexico The Mexico Ledger (A) (C) Moberly Monitor-Index/Evening Democrat (A) (C) Monett The Monett Times (A) (C) Monroe City The Lake Gazette (A) (C) Mound City Mound City News (A) (C) Neosho Neosho Daily News (A) (C) Nevada Nevada Daily Mail (A) (C) New Haven New Haven Leader (A) (C) Nixa Nixa News-Enterprise (A) (C) Ozark Christian County Headliner (A) (C) Paris The Monroe County Appeal (A) (C) Park Hills The Daily Journal (A) (C) Perryville Republic-Monitor (A) (C) Piedmont Wayne County Journal-Banner (A) (C) Pineville McDonald County Press (A) (C) Platte City Platte County Citizen (A) (C) Platte City The Landmark Newspaper (A) (C) Poplar Bluff Daily American Republic (A) (C) Richland Richland Mirror (A) (C) Richmond Richmond Daily News (A) (C) Rock Port Atchison County Mail (A) (C) Rolla Rolla Daily News (A) (C) Saint Joseph St. Joseph News-Press (A) (C) Saint Louis Chinese American News (A) (C) Saint Louis St. Louis American Newspaper (A) (C) Saint Louis St. Louis Business Journal (A) (C) Saint Louis St. Louis Post-Dispatch (A) (C) Saint Louis The Riverfront Times (A) (C) Saint Louis The Suburban Journals (A) (C) Saint Louis The Vital VOICE (A) (C) Saint Robert Pulaski County Democrat (A) (C) Sainte Genevieve The Herald (A) (C) Sedalia Sedalia Democrat (A) (C) Sedalia Sedalia News-Journal (A) (C) Sikeston Standard Democrat (A) (C) Springfield Community Free Press (A) (C) Springfield News-Leader (A) (C) Springfield Springfield Business Journal (A) (C) Steelville Star - Mirror (A) (C) Stover Morgan County Press (A) (C) Sullivan Sullivan News (A) (C) Sullivan The Sullivan Journal (A) (C) Tipton Tipton Times (A) (C) Troy Lincoln County Journal (A) (C) Tuscumbia Miller County Autogram-Sentinel (A) (C) Vandalia Vandalia Leader (A) (C) Versailles Versailles Leader-Statesman (A) (C) Warrensburg digitalBURG.com (A) (C) Washington Washington Missourian (A) (C) Washington WashMo.com (A) (C) Waynesville The Daily Guide (A) (C) Webster Groves Times Newspapers (A) (C) West Plains Daily Quill (A) (C) College Newspapers Drury University The Drury Mirror Missouri Southern St. Univ The Chart Missouri St. Univ The Standard Missouri Western Griffon News Missouri-Rolla Miner Northwest Missouri NW Missourian Daily Southwest Baptist Omnibus Online St. Louis Univ University News SW Missouri State Southwest Standard Truman State New Media Index Univ of Missouri The Current Univ of Missouri The Greek Chronicle Univ of Missouri The Maneater Univ of Missouri University News Washington Univ Student Life Online Webster Univ The Webster Journal
Editorial Page Victories clarify: Obama will win 2-1 in Electoral College! 4 part compendium---Endorsements at OpEdNews: Washington Post, Houston, Detroit, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Chicago, Salt Lake, Philadelphia, Portland, Bangor, Sacramento, Kansas City (4 former Red States)
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO COMMENT AND SHARE YOUR INSIGHTS, which become a vital part of a larger on-going dialogue.
Thank you,
Stephen FoxFounder, New Millennium Fine ArtContributing Editor New Millennium Fine ArtSanta Fe, NM
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Endorsements-Salt-Lake-Ci-by-Stephen-Fox-081018-476.html
WHY ENDORSE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Stephen J. Winters, former Connecticut Post opinion editor: "Here are reasons why we endorse: * "to fulfill our obligation and responsibility as a constitutionally-protected media enterprise to not only be a part of our communities but to also help improve those communities. * "to offer information and perspective that voters can use in evaluating candidates. * "to create dialogue with our readers. "Our endorsements are not made: * "to tell readers who they should vote for. * "to make a compact with any candidate. * "to figure out who's most likely to win a contest."
_______________________________________
Time magazine Managing Editor Rick Stengel recently:
"During the 1936 presidential campaign, the Chicago Tribune, under its archconservative owner, Colonel Robert McCormick, wholeheartedly endorsed the candidacy of the Republican Alf Landon. The paper was so vehemently anti-F.D.R. that 10 days before the election, switchboard operators at the newspaper answered the phone by saying 'Hello. Chicago Tribune. Only 10 days left to save the American way of life.' I confess that I've never quite understood why newspapers endorse presidential candidates. Sure, I know the history and the tradition, the fact that newspapers in the 18th and 19th centuries were often affiliated with political parties, but why do they do it now? Why do it at a time when the credibility and viability of the press are at all-time lows? More important, why do it at a time when readers, especially young readers, question the objectivity of newspapers in particular and the media in general?"
BEHIND THE SCENES ON THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE'S ENDORSEMENT In a column discussing the Chicago Tribune's historic endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama for president, Paul Weingarten, a member of the paper's editorial board, wrote on Friday:
"Of all the articles that appear in this newspaper, few are as mysterious to readers as its presidential endorsements. Readers ask Tribune editorial board members all the time how those decisions are reached. Was there a lot of shouting? And finally, who really decided?
This year, with the Tribune's endorsement of its first Democrat, Sen. Barack Obama, we expect even more questions. A lot of readers will be surprised by the decision to endorse Obama. But maybe you don't know the Tribune as well as you think.
So let us remind you of the paper's long record of independent thought, of reporting - and sometimes making - history. Yes, the paper has stood for Republican principles for a long time. In 1855, a young politician named Abraham Lincoln wandered into the offices of the Tribune on Clark Street. Lincoln handed over $4 for a subscription and complimented the new co-owner and managing editor, Joseph Medill, on his stand against intolerance. 'I didn't like it before you boys took hold of it,' he said of the Tribune." ___________________________________
The Salt Lake Tribune's endorsement policy explained by Editorial Page Editor Vern Anderson: - "Utah's Independent Voice Since 1871":
We endorse candidates as a public service to our readers. We also believe endorsements are part of our responsibility as a newspaper to enlighten, inform and promote public dialogue. With the exception of the presidential endorsement, which is scheduled to run on Sunday, they are based on face-to-face meetings with each candidate and on our own research.
Our endorsements are not intended to tell people how to vote. Rather, they reflect how the editorial board would vote, and why, if it had a ballot. Most often our endorsements are based on positions we have taken over time on a number of public policy issues. But not always. Sometimes we see particular strengths in a candidate that are well-suited to the office, even if we disagree with many of their views. We endorse both Democrats and Republicans, sometimes heartily, sometimes not. As readers know, we are far from infallible. We've made several endorsements we'd take back if we could.
_________________________
BRUNSWICK MAINE TIMES RECORD: Obama for President letters@TimesRecord.Com 10/17/2008
His vision for reuniting this fragmented nation, not audacity, makes Barack Obama the best hope to lead the United States for the next four years. His perspectives on the challenges that will confront the next president reflect the intelligence, wisdom and modernity required to position America to thrive in the 21st century.
Obama's action plan for addressing the critical issues that the 44th U.S. president will encounter on Jan. 21, 2009, offers more depth and innovation than that of his Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain.
In his bearing and his thinking, Obama better reflects the long-held — but recently tarnished — American values of equality, justice, fairness and civil liberty. He recognizes that government affects everyday Americans' lives, so policies should be crafted to benefit the middle class directly rather than indirectly via crumb-spreading by those who have been allowed to consolidate wealth and power during the Bush administration.
On key issues, here are capsule summaries of why Obama would be a better president than McCain:
Economy: Obama's proposed tax restructuring would begin reversing the devastating impact of the Bush tax cuts on the federal budget and provide direct relief to workers, whose wages have stagnated. He acknowledges that war saps the economy.
Conversely, McCain continues to hold fast to the philosophy that maintaining tax breaks for the nation's wealthiest residents will spur economic growth, the benefits of which will trickle down to average citizens. That's happening now, right?
Energy: From his earliest days as a candidate, Obama has advocated significant investment in wind, solar and other "clean" alternative energy sources as a way of creating jobs, minimizing human impact on climate change and reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil.
McCain counters with, "Drill, baby, drill," the 2008 campaign's equivalent of "Toga, toga, toga," a chant frat boys in the film "Animal House" repeated to make them feel better and forget that they were all failing. — like fossil fuel-based energy policy.
Health care: Obama's plan focuses on better oversight of insurers, which is long overdue; more aggressive cost containment; and better access to preventive medicine.
Again, McCain's belief that unfettered market forces will drive down prices ignores precedents in the energy and food sectors and fails to recognize that health care cannot be treated like other commodities.
Supreme Court: Contrary to the rhetoric that became conservative dogma during the 1980s, all courts are activist courts. The only variable is which political agenda will drive that activism.
President Bush's two appointees, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, caused the court to lurch to the right. McCain endorses that swing, which has already manifested itself in decisions that erode privacy rights and civil liberties.
With as many as three Supreme Court seats opening during the next four years, an Obama presidency would balance the recent ascendancy of the court's conservative wing.
Foreign policy: Obama and McCain split markedly on how the United States should conduct itself in the global community, with Iraq as a centerpiece. The Bush administration's discredited rationale for launching the war and its mismanagement of reconstruction have gravely undermined other nations' trust in and respect for the United States. McCain's perspective on Iraq and foreign policy in general derives from his experience in the Navy. Hence, his strategy subjugates diplomacy to military orthodoxy and a "duffer's mulligan" of the same counterinsurgency tactics that failed in Vietnam.
Obama's personal history and deep knowledge of world history make him far more likely to strengthen frayed alliances by re-establishing a coalition of the willing rather than of the coerced.
Character: Frankly, the next president will inherit a mess of epic proportions from a short-sighted and small-minded administration that diminished the United States' stature at home and abroad by adhering to a "you're with us or you're evil" approach to domestic and foreign policy.
Electing Barack Obama would demonstrate that America is better than the way our government has conducted the people's business during the last eight years. It would repudiate outside claims that this nation has become a hypocritical, floundering empire and affirm that we remain a civilization founded on opportunity, equality and each person's freedom to fulfill his or her promise.
McCain served our parents well. Obama will serve our children better.
_____________________________________
Barack Obama for President BANGOR MAINE
Change has become an overused buzzword this election, but change is what this country needs. Change from a misguided foreign policy that indefinitely leaves U.S. troops in Iraq more than five years after an invasion based on dubious evidence. Change from a hands-off approach to financial markets that have paralyzed the U.S. economy. Change from a fiscal policy that has ballooned the federal deficit and shortchanged domestic programs. Change from an administration veiled in secrecy with little regard for the Constitution and American principles. Barack Obama represents that change.
This paper has long respected and supported John McCain, especially his efforts, often along with Maine’s senators, on climate change, campaign finance reform and government spending. That John McCain is not running for president.
The Sen. McCain on the Nov. 4 ballot favors extending the fiscally irresponsible Bush tax cuts when the "maverick" voted against them in the Senate. The Sen. McCain running for president says he is firmly pro-life although he previously said he would oppose overturning Roe v. Wade because that would cause women to have dangerous illegal abortions.
Sen. McCain, who has a long record of distinguished service to his country, has compromised his principles to get elected. His reckless choice of Sarah Palin, the folksy but untested and incurious governor of the country’s most government-dependent state, as his running mate is a prime example. Worse is his tolerance of his campaign's desperate attempts to paint Sen. Obama as a friend of terrorists because he served on a board with William Ayers, a member of the radical 1960s group the Weather Underground.
As conservative columnist George Will wrote last month: “It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?
With a record number of Americans believing the country is on the wrong track, strong leadership and a commitment to moving in a new direction are needed. While his opponents have derided Sen. Obama's talk of hope and unity as empty slogans, the popularity of his campaign shows that the country is eager for positive leadership, not a continuation of the divisiveness fostered by the Bush administration.
Backing hope and unity ensures that Maine remains focused on the future, where a return to the country's positive prospects lies.
A positive message, of course, is not enough to be elected president, and we do have reservations about Sen. Obama's limited experience: he has served only four years in the U.S. Senate and three terms in the Illinois Senate. But he has shown an eagerness to surround himself with well-informed advisers and, as important, a willingness to listen to dissenting views.
If elected, Sen. Obama will work with a Congress controlled by Democrats. He and party leaders have a responsibility to restrain government spending, resist growth in government programs and foster moderate policy shifts, which requires building on good ideas from Republicans and Democrats alike.
This is especially necessary because Sen. Obama will have a difficult time finding ways to pay for the needed, but expensive reforms he proposes for health care, education and the tax code. Addressing voters' top concerns: righting the economy, ending the war in Iraq and moving America toward energy independence will only come through bipartisan negotiations, in which Sen. McCain can play a key role as he has on important issues such as climate change and military contracting.
At a cost of $10 billion a month, the loss of more than 4,000 American soldiers' lives and the constraints it placed on the U.S. military, the current strategy in Iraq is not sustainable. Sen. Obama understands this.
He also understands that drilling for oil without conservation and support for renewable energy won't move the U.S. toward energy independence. He understands that reducing taxes and health care costs for the middle class and small businesses are essential to rebuilding the economy.
For these reasons, the policies of the Barack Obama and Joe Biden ticket and its serious focus on our most pressing issues will better serve Maine and America. _________________
The Kansas City Star endorsed Obama on Oct. 17:
We believe Sen. Barack Obama is the right person to lead the country forward. He is a man of strength, empathy, energy and intelligence.
The Illinois Democrat understands the challenges that await George Bush's successor. A gifted public servant whose roots extend to his mother's birthplace in Kansas, Obama has a rare ability to encourage hope among the dispirited and to inspire young people.
Obama's sound judgment is reflected in his choice for a running mate. Sen. Joe Biden is a passionate advocate of ordinary Americans and a foreign-policy expert who would be prepared to assume the Oval Office on a moment's notice ...
McCain has been a less impressive candidate this year than when he ran for president in 2000. Although claiming to be a change agent, he is following in Bush's footsteps on everything from the war in Iraq to tax breaks that favor the wealthy over the middle class.
Despite his age and previous health problems, McCain chose a vice presidential candidate who is so clearly unqualified for high office that the thought of her stepping into the presidency is frightening._________________________________
Salt Lake (Utah) Tribune endorsed Obama on Oct. 17:
Out of nowhere, and without proper vetting, the impetuous McCain picked Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. She quickly proved grievously underequipped to step into the presidency should McCain, at 72 and with a history of health problems, die in office. More than any single factor, McCain's bad judgment in choosing the inarticulate, insular and ethically challenged Palin disqualifies him for the presidency. ...
The country desperately needs a new and well-defined road map for the 21st century and leadership that can unite the country behind it.
We believe that Barack Obama can give us both.
___
The (Portland) Oregonian endorsed Obama on Oct. 18:
Obama has the best chance, and the best abilities, to rebuild an American economy that has grown dangerously unstable, with government, consumers and the nation itself spiraling deeply into debt and selling off the national future to pay for daily expenses. He is the best choice to rebuild the American position in the world, to restore our ties with traditional allies, to re-make the American argument to the rest of the world.
Crucially, Barack Obama can recall the United States to its own highest principles and priorities. He can change course after an administration that has often cut constitutional and legal corners, and frequently stumbled into policy and philosophical embarrassment.
The Miami Herald endorsed Obama on Oct. 18:
The way the two candidates responded to the economic meltdown offers a lesson in contrasting styles of leadership. Both have put forth a series of worthwhile policy options, but where Sen. Obama was calm, Sen. McCain was frantic. He first put his campaign "on hold" and suggested he would cancel the first debate, and then suddenly decided to take part even as the first bailout deal cratered. He said the fundamentals of the economy were strong, then a few days later vowed to "name the names" of those responsible for the financial crisis.
In other elections, voters have complained of having to make a choice between two bad candidates. That is not the case this time. The nation is fortunate to have good candidates and a clear choice. Sen. Obama represents the best chance for America to make a clean break with the culture wars and failed policies of the past, and begin to restore the hope and promise of America as the world's greatest democracy.
The Philadelphia Inquirer endorsed Obama on Oct. 18:
If America is going to fight its way out of a worldwide economic crisis that has people fearful of losing not only their homes but also their jobs, and fearful of unending war, then it must have better leadership than it has had the past eight years. ...
Both major candidates are trying to avoid association with Bush's failed policies. But only one does so successfully. On every issue important to America, Barack Obama offers a plan that would pull this nation from the precipice built by bad Bush decisions. The Inquirer endorses Barack Obama for president.
While John McCain also promises "change," it's hard to believe that's possible from someone who, by his own admission, has voted with Bush 90 percent of the time. ...
More troubling was McCain's selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. This blatant overture to women voters and evangelical Christians who share her views on abortion backfired when Palin in interviews proved she is not prepared to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. ...
There's another reason to vote for Obama. It would tell the world that the melting-pot America of legend has finally become a reality. ... With his eloquent oratory, Obama has already taken big steps to bridge America's racial divide.
[BIO: In 1980, Stephen Fox founded New Millennium Fine Art, a Santa Fe gallery specializing in Native American and Landscape, and is very active in New Mexico Legislative consumer protection politics, trying above to get the FDA to rescind its approval for the neurotoxic and carcinogenic artificial sweetener, Aspartame. [http://www.prlog.org/10070694] In a strictly legislative context, his most important writing has been for the Hawaii Senate: http://www.prlog.org/10056715-hawaii-senate In his capacity as Contributing Editor of the Santa Fe Sun News, Fox recently interviewed Mikhail Gorbachev: http://www.prlog.org/10064349-mikhail-gorbachev He has been adamant and resourceful about exposing the charlatans of the sometimes-organic food movement. Take the time to read this press release concerning California Attorney General Jerry Brown's suits against Whole Foods, Avalon, and others, for either knowingly or negligently adding a deadly carcinogen to their body care products and soap, as in Whole Foods 365 Label products: http://www.prlog.org/10079593]
Obama's Editorial Endorsements: including Washington Post, Fidel Castro, Richard Lugar, Chuck Hagel, & more!
I hope you take a few moments to share your insights in a comment here and at OpEdNews, which then becomes a vital part of a larger dialogue.
Thanks, Stephen FoxFounder, New Millennium Fine Art Santa Fe NM
Recent newspaper endorsements of the presidential candidates, selected for the quality of their writing and the depths of their insights
Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times endorsed Democrat Barack Obama on Oct. 5:
We now face a future fraught with difficulty. It is no time to fear, but rather to change directions and unite behind a dynamic, thoughtful and progressive leader, Democrat Barack Obama.
He has stirred hope among millions of Americans, many of whom were alienated from politics or marginalized in society. He has restored a sense of idealism and promise that American values will again be our respected guide in the world, that the American dream is still very much alive in our nation, and that what is wrong can be fixed.
Sen. Obama's opponent, Republican John McCain, has long served his country, and as a young man, at great personal sacrifice. But he is not ready to lead America in the 21st century. His view of the world is outdated and unduly restricted by a military lens.
The Durango (Colo.) Herald endorsed Obama on Oct. 12:
The United States faces a pivotal choice in this presidential election, and the alternatives are clear. What is needed in that decision, as in our markets and our dealings with the world, is to act like Americans and approach the future with optimism. Voters should reject the politics of fear and elect Barack Obama.
Obama offers what America now needs: Confidence without swagger, intelligence without condescension, a mind unencumbered with the baggage of the '60s, and an optimistic outlook eloquently expressed.
After the feckless leadership of the last eight years, the offer of hope is beyond appealing. It is essential. We need to restore this country's position as a bastion of human rights and re-establish respect for the United States government at home and abroad. We must reinvigorate and restructure our economy, revive the idea that children will be better off than their parents, and face the 21st century with confidence.
John McCain cannot do that. He is intellectually and emotionally trapped in a bygone era. And since his 2000 run, the maverick McCain has been replaced by one with a wet finger in the wind.
Obama, however, offers a clear and certain break with the past. And that is absolutely necessary. It is taking a chance, of course, but that risk is less than that of continuing Bush's work.
The Commercial Appeal in Memphis, Tenn., endorsed Obama on Oct. 16:
American adults are asking a terrible question as Nov. 4 approaches: Will my children have the opportunities that I was afforded in my youth?
The times call for a steady hand, a confident voice and a messenger who delivers hope rather than fear.
While the country negotiates some of the most treacherous waters in the last 50 years, (Obama) is the candidate most capable of leading it to a safer shore.
-----------
COLUMBIAN, WASHINGTON STATEIn Our View: Obama for PresidentAs voters consider unprecedented change, this race hinges on leadership and judgmentThursday, October 16 | 1:00 a.m.
Americans face what is arguably the nation's most historically significant presidential election ever. Either the first black president or the first female vice president will be elected Nov. 4.
But this election also is a milestone for a reason unrelated to race or gender. For the first time in 20 years, the next president will not be a Bush or a Clinton. Never have just two families occupied the White House for so long. Today's typical college freshman has never lived under a president by any other name. It's time for a change.
So it's no surprise that John McCain and Barack Obama are campaigning as agents of change. All the more reason for voters to participate. In Clark County, ballots were mailed yesterday.
Any successful reformer must excel in leadership and judgment. In the past several months, Obama has distanced himself as the superior candidate in those two areas, and today he receives The Columbian�s endorsement for president. Two quick reminders:
Our opinion is only that, refuted by many, carrying no distinguishable impact. Our opinion is offered more to stimulate conversation than to change minds.
No candidate is perfect, as evidenced by our 2004 endorsement: Bush, Reluctantly
Obama carries baggage we consider unsightly, such as the unfair advantages he would grant labor unions. We also are wary of a few past relationships he's had with controversial figures. McCain carries that same baggage, to a lesser degree.
But as we examined leadership qualities of both men, we saw Obama's massive strides in uniting his own Democratic party, even reaching beyond his party to speak to all Americans. McCain, in stark contrast, continues to slog through a fractious Republican Party that often is his worst enemy.
It takes strong leadership skills to enlist record numbers of volunteers and to continually explore new heights in the polls, as Obama methodically demonstrates.
As for judgment, Obama chose a running mate who neither hurt him in the polls nor diverted the spotlight from the main man on the ticket. McCain's choice has done both. McCain tries to masquerade this recklessness as the virtue of a maverick. Would he use that same recklessness in appointing Supreme Court justices and Cabinet members? Which candidate in recent weeks has shown a presidential demeanor? Which could best restore worldwide respect for the U.S.? Which man has tried to soothe not stoke rancor in the homestretch of this campaign? Clearly, that man is Obama.
On the issues, Obama and McCain share similar views on immigration, Social Security and Medicare. Their differences on how to repair the economy are not overly contradictory. On the Iraq War, Obama prefers a quicker withdrawal of troops than we would like, but his proven leadership and solid judgment indicate he can resolve the Iraq dilemma collaboratively, certainly not by waving a white flag as McCain repeatedly claims. Both men urge public investment in science and technology. On health care, Obama believes it is a right; McCain believes it is a responsibility. Obama would raise taxes on the rich but not the rest of us, while McCain wants to make permanent the Bush tax cuts of 2003.
Beyond these issues, let's review two popular but empty charges against Obama. His supposed lack of experience, history reveals, is a red herring. His 12 years in elected office are more than Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan each brought to the presidency. Too young at 47? Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton were younger. (Also on the subject of age, is McCain too old at 72? Certainly not.)
America's comparison between the upstart reformer and the venerable war hero inexorably returns to the qualities of leadership and judgment. Obama wins that comparison, and his message of partnerships at home and abroad seals the deal for us.--------------THE TENNESSEAN
This newspaper believes Obama would be an inspiring choice at an extraordinary time for the nation. The country needs a fresh, energetic face in the White House. Every race for president is important, but the current confluence of events, including the war on terror, mountainous challenges in the economy and a growing strain upon the nation's health-care system make the current race a call for vigorous new approaches and enthusiasm.
Obama has managed to put a tone of optimism in his campaign at a time it would be very easy to be downhearted, worried and pessimistic. That characteristic alone goes a long way in demonstrating the kind of leadership the nation needs.
Obama has made the case effectively that his Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, represents too much of the same failed policies that have plagued the nation during the Bush administration. McCain, it must be said, is a genuine military hero and an honorable candidate. His years of service both in the military and in Congress are traits any American should admire. But at this time, at this juncture, McCain does not embody the motivational leader Americans deserve for such crucial issues.
There is no question the economy is foremost on the minds of many Americans today. People are witnessing a financial system in chaos, and they are seeing their personal lives in upheaval because of the problem. People are fearful about their jobs, their retirement, their ability even to meet day-to-day needs. At the moment, the nation is still trying to get a handle on exactly what is happening in its economy, as some of the best economic minds in the country try to sift through possible solutions. Obama offers no magic wand, but he has been effective in linking the crisis to failed economic policies, and he expresses a keen understanding of how the crisis is creating hardship on American families....
Further, Obama demonstrated sound judgment in selecting as his running mate Sen. Joe Biden, whose experience and knowledge of foreign policy prepare him to step in if need be as chief executive. McCain's selection of Gov. Sarah Palin, by comparison, may have shown political savvy, but at the expense of offering a vice president the country could rally around....
The nation could ask for no more. Obama has the opportunity to lift the United States at a time when its burdens are heavy. His campaign has carried a theme of "Yes We Can," which is exactly the message the nation needs to hear most now.
THE POST-GAZETTE PITTSBURGH
In three weeks, Americans will be called upon to make an exceptional judgment worthy of the times. The forces of history appear to invite boldness and the Post-Gazette believes they should be heeded by voting for the only authentic, fresh agent of change in this race, Barack Obama....
Despite the recent nastiness of his campaign. Sen. McCain is essentially a good man, but he is yesterday's man. His campaign takes its core text from the "Wizard of Oz": Don't mind the man behind the curtain. That man is George Bush, the failed magician who cannot be spoken of lest the American people be reminded of what he has wrought and what party he belongs to.
To make their trick work, Mr. McCain and his running mate, Gov. Palin, trade heavily on being mavericks -- too heavily to be believed.
It is true that Mr. McCain has a capricious streak that has made him a thorn in the side of his own party on various issues. Yet while he has not joined the know-nothing brigade in climate change denial, he has picked a running mate who is a diva in the drill, baby, drill chorus of fossil-fuel adulation. Mr. Obama, while he has recognized the need for more drilling, has put more emphasis on new sources of alternative energy, the only real hope for the future.
On Iraq, Mr. McCain did needle the Bush administration to put in more troops and he makes much of the fact that he backed the surge. That the surge was a success to the point that it reduced bloodshed does not vindicate the wrong decision in the first place to invade a country that was not behind the 9/11 attacks and did not have weapons of mass destruction; Iraq has been a huge diversion from Afghanistan.
All of this Mr. McCain, despite his vaunted experience, got wrong at the start when Barack Obama recognized the folly. That fundamental error is still costing the nation $10 billion a month, funds desperately needed at home, yet Mr. McCain sees the surge as more reason to stay than to plan now to leave and put the war in the hands of the only people who can ultimately win it: the Iraqis. That is what Mr. Obama wants to do in stages and what Mr. McCain only hopes for over the rainbow.
On health care, Mr. McCain's insurance plan is straight from the George Bush playbook, with its heavy reliance on private competition to give Americans coverage. His $5,000 tax credit for families is a pittance that won't solve America's national shame, the millions in the ranks of the uninsured. Mr. Obama's health-care plan will address that directly -- and, no, it won't be socialism. Americans will still have their choices.
On the economic meltdown, Mr. McCain famously said "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" shortly before it collapsed. Although he has admitted that economics is not his strong suit, he foolishly suspended his campaign briefly to interject himself into a situation that he did not understand and where he was not wanted.
Mr. Obama doesn't have all the answers either, but he does acknowledge what former champion of deregulation John McCain can't: While there's blame to go around both parties, the economic crisis is the final verdict on the failure of the Bush administration.
In this and much else, Mr. McCain is not the steady hand he purports to be, and nothing proves it more than his reckless selection of Sarah Palin, whose lack of knowledge to take over as president has becoming increasingly obvious and embarrassing. If Mr. McCain had chosen one of the many accomplished women in the Republican Party, his candidacy would have the stamp of seriousness. Instead, it bears the superficial imprint of pandering populism.
But this election is not just about the shortcomings of Mr. McCain and Ms. Palin and the failed legacy of a philosophy that they seek to perpetuate under the hastily erected banner of maverick.
It is about the strengths of Barack Obama, whose rise to prominence is not a fluke or national infatuation but the consequence of his remarkable skills --a keen intellect, noble intentions and the wit and grace to express them in ways that have inspired millions across the country. He has a rare gift exactly suited to the fearful times -- he knows the language of reassurance and hope.
If his were just empty words, this would be just another cheap political gift. But what he says is carefully considered. In the debates and on the hustings, Mr. Obama has been the voice of moderation, combining common sense and compassion on issue after issue. When the subject turns to foreign policy, supposedly Mr. McCain's strong suit, Mr. Obama gives no indication that he will have to learn on the job.
That the argument about issues has been essentially won by Sen. Obama is plain from the scurrilous attacks now being launched against his character -- increasingly by Ms. Palin -- alleging guilt by association, unpatriotic behavior and worse.
This closing blizzard of slime is another attempt to spread the wizard's curtain further: Don't look at how the economy has impoverished you while a Republican has been in the White House, look at Mr. Obama's passing acquaintance with an old radical who did bad deeds almost 40 years ago, because that is more important.
Yes, they apparently do think the American people are that stupid.
On Nov. 4, we believe Americans will heed the better angels of their nature and recognize that the election of the eloquent Barack Obama -- whose story is a quintessentially American one of impossible odds overcome -- will best answer the pressing call of history.
_______________________
Obama’s ‘Diplomacy’ Wins a Republican Endorsement By Adam Graham-Silverman, Congressional Quarterly Staff The ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee parted ways with his party’s presidential nominee Wednesday by endorsing Democrat Barack Obama ’s approach to diplomacy.
In a lengthy speech at the National Defense University, Indiana Sen. Richard G. Lugar weighed the benefits of talking to foreign leaders, including U.S. enemies, against other actions, such as military force. The issue marks one of the sharpest divides between Obama and John McCain , who has called the Democratic nominee naive for suggesting that he would sit down with leaders such as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Lugar, however, praised Obama, noting that isolation often does not resolve contentious issues.
“He correctly cautions against the implication that hostile nations must be dealt with almost exclusively through isolation or military force,” Lugar said in a prepared remarks released before his speech. “In some cases, refusing to talk can even be dangerous.”
Lugar, however, said McCain is right to warn that “there are times when diplomatic approaches to rogue regimes have little efficacy.” But he cited North Korea, which was just removed from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terror, as a diplomatic success story and urged more contact with Syria and Iran.
This is not the first time Lugar and Obama have seen eye-to-eye on foreign policy issues. Lugar noted back in July that he was “pleased” to have worked with Obama on nuclear proliferation issues after an Obama ad ran mentioning Lugar by name.
Lugar also used his speech to underscore his concern that U.S. foreign policy has become too reactive.
“If most U.S. foreign policy attention is devoted to crises fomented by hostile regimes, we are ceding the initiative to our enemies and reducing our capacity to lead the world in ways that are more likely to affect our future,” Lugar said.
___________________________________________
EDITORIAL: Obama for President: We believe the senator from Illinois is the right man to lead our country in a new direction
The Lufkin Daily News, PULITZER PRIZE WINNING NEWSPAPER IN TEXAS
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Today through Sunday, we're making our endorsements for the 2008 election. Our endorsements are not partisan — we supported George Bush in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. Our choices reflect whose policies and strengths we think, after careful consideration, will mean a better, stronger economy and way of life for Angelina County, Texas and the United States.
To that end, the choice for this year's president is clear: Barack Obama, senator from Illinois.
His strength has been to appeal to a broad range of people, including the vital youth who are tomorrow's leaders. After watching an inflexible president go overboard in a $700 billion bailout on loyalty for his nominee, Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, we think it's time for a changing of the guard.
The East Texas economy is fundamentally doing well, and we're not hitting highs and lows like other areas, some local leaders have said. But it remains a fact that while the rich battle it out over billions, poverty is barking louder than ever at our rural doors. As a litmus test, consider the Christian Information Service Center, our largest area food bank. It has had more people than ever through its doors — including more elderly and middle class than ever before.
Hundreds of local families have been impacted as fuel and utility costs skyrocket, and job losses mount as major employers have circled the drain or gone down altogether. It's hard to remember the fundamentals when you're deciding between buying your medication or keeping the lights on.
Those people who think what's happening nationally has had little effect on East Texas haven't checked their 401(k)s, or more likely aren't among the many whose worry is about surviving until the end of the month, let alone retirement.
It's the working class that are the backbone of this country, and we need someone to help us share the wealth while still encouraging a free market economy. We believe Obama has shown more interest in helping the middle class, and has proposed plans to make that happen.
Another consideration is that we should elect a president whose vice president would be ready to lead if, heaven forbid, the president were to die in office. We think Joe Biden's experience overwhelms Sarah Palin's limited appeal as a candidate who would instill confidence during a national crisis.
At the end of the day, it's about how you and your family will fare — while still caring how your neighbor and the needy guy down the block is doing.
We're making our voice heard. We hope you'll go to the polls Nov. 4 and do the same.____________________________________
HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA:The Herald-Dispatch editorial board met today. We spent a lot of time discussing the presidential endorsement, which comes out Sunday.
First, a bit of history. As best I remember, The Herald-Dispatch has endorsed every Democratic candidate since Jimmy Carter in 1976. Before then, I have no memory. So going by those elections, the HD is 3-5 in agreeing with the American voter.
I can't say here who gets our endorsement, but I can say that the discussion was calm at times and less sedate at others. The thing was that no one was really excited about either candidate.
But we were all over 50, and we have seen too much to be too excited about candidates. None of us sees anyone running as a Messiah who will lead us to the promised land.
________________________________UNATTRIBUTED, BUT KEEN INSIGHTS:
My own prediction: Obama will win, and Democrats will control both houses of Congress. In 2010, Republicans will regain control of one house, and the Republicans will win back the White House in 2012. Whether they regain control of both houses of Congress I cannot say, but I seriously doubt it.
This assumes the Republican Party acts with more intelligence and foresight than it has shown since 2004.
This year, the Democratic Party had two strong candidates in the primary. The GOP really had none. For a party that is supposed to be conservative, the GOP had no strong conservative with wide appeal in the primaries. McCain won almost by default, and if he surprises a lot of us and wins the election this year, it will be more a vote against Obama than a vote for McCain. I have talked with several Republicans, and very few are voting for him. They are either voting for Palin or against Obama. Or they are voting for the Republican candidate, whoever it may be. I know of no one who is voting for McCain because he is John McCain.
You can't do well in the long run if that's your base. But it's what the GOP did to itself.
____________________________________
Fidel Castro Endorses Obama -- AgainBy Humberto FontovaThe American Thinker
Barack Obama's Kenyan cousin Raila Obinga did well in naming his son Fidel Castro Odinga. From Havana this week, Obama's nephew's namesake issued his 2nd Barack Obama endorsement.
"The only thing that abounds in McCain are years" wrote the Stalinist Cuban dictator in his regime's official paper. "His (electoral) adversary far surpasses McCain in intelligence and serenity. And his health is not guaranteed."
So a major concern for Castro is,
"that the lady with the rifles, the inexperienced ex-governor of Alaska, could became U.S. President. We observe that she knows absolutely nothing about anything."
Castro's favoritism towards Democrats is nothing new. "We'd better hope Kennedy wins this election," Fidel Castro confided to a subaltern in 1960. "If Nixon wins our revolution won't last." the Bay of Pigs and Missile Crisis betrayals (of free Cubans) vindicated Castro's foresight a thousand times over.
I admit to imprecision when labeling Fidel Castro a "Stalinist dictator." For the record: the Castro-Che incarceration of political prisoners actually surpassed Stalin's. In her authoritative book, Gulag, Anne Applebaum documents that, all-told, 18 million people passed through Stalin's prison-camps. At any one time 2 million were incarcerated. That was out of a Soviet population of 220 million. Cuba's population in 1960 was 6.4 million. According to Freedom House, 500,000 Cubans (young and old, male and female) have passed through Castro and Che's prison camps. At one point in 1961, 350,000 Cubans crammed Castro's Gulag. Do the math.
"A profound racism exists in the U.S.," continues Fidel Castro in his Obama-endorsement. "It's a miracle that the Democratic candidate has not suffered the fate of other Americans who dreamed of equality and justice like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King."
For the record: Fidel Castro, forcibly overthrew a black Cuban head of state (Fulgencio Batista) and replaced his government with one where only nine percent of the ruling Stalinist party is black and where the prison population is 80- 90 percent black. He jailed the longest suffering black political prisoner of modern history (Eusebio Penalver who suffered longer in Castro's dungeon's than Nelson Mandela suffered in South Africa's.) He sentenced other blacks (Dr Elias Biscet, Jorge Antunez) to 20 year sentences essentially for quoting Martin Luther King Jr. in a public square.
"(Obama) has a habit of looking at his adversary with serenity and laughing at the verbal gaffes of an opponent who looks blankly into space," continues Castro's chucklesome article, where he proceeds to denounce McCain as "a habitual liar, who lacks an ethical code and is an instrument of the "Miami Mafia" (overwhelmingly Republican Cuban-Americans.)
Castro laments the "brutal measures" the U.S. is adopting during "this capitalist crisis," because these "will provoke more inflation, more devaluation and more loss of markets." Thus a McCain victory would be economically disastrous, because, "he was one of the worst students ever at West Point and knew nothing about mathematics, and knows nothing about economic complications."
For the record: Fidel Castro converted a nation with a higher per capita income than half of Europe, the lowest inflation rate in the Western hemisphere, a larger middle class than Switzerland, a huge influx of immigrants and whose workers enjoyed the 8th industrial wages in the world into one that repels Haitians. And this after being lavished with Soviet subsidies that totaled almost ten Marshall Plans (again, into a nation of 6.4 million) -an economic feat that defies not only the laws of economics but seemingly the very laws of physics.
Actually, Castroites have been associates of Obama's associates for decades. "I have been affiliated with the Cuba Council of Churches since the 1980s," boasted Rev. Jeremiah Wright in a sermon on July 16, 2006. "I have several close Cuban friends who work with the Cuba Council of Churches and you have heard me preach about our affiliation and the Black Theology Project's trips to Cuba. The Cuban Council of Churches has been a non-partisan global mission partner for decades. I have worked with them for two decades."
"Non-partisan," Reverend Wright? Not according to Cuban intelligence defector Juan Vives, who from hands-on experience reports that the Cuba Council of Churches is in fact an arm of Cuba's ICAP (Instituto Cubano de Amistad con los Pueblos) itself an arm of Cuba's DGI, Cuba's secret police, founded and mentored by the KGB and East German STASI. The ICAP's long-time chieftain was Rene Cruz Rodriguez, perhaps one of Reverend Jeremiah Wright's "friends."
Rodriguez' meteoric rise through Cuba's Stalinist bureaucracy was facilitated by his diligence as an early executioner, often beating out Che Guevara and Raul Castro themselves in his zeal to shatter the firing-squad victim's skull with a coup d' grace from his .45.____________________________________________________
About 100 Napa County-based Barack Obama supporters showed up Monday afternoon on the front steps of the Napa Valley Register building in downtown Napa to protest the newspaper's Sunday endorsement of John McCain for President.
____________________________________SAN DIEGO CITY BEAT:
Seems kind of pointless to run through a litany of policy areas in which Barack Obama is a far superior choice over John McCain, what with California already signed, sealed and delivered for the Democrat, but we’d like to run up the score and make it a landslide, so we’ll say, briefly, that Obama has shown himself to be the more thoughtful and, dare we say it, more presidential candidate. He’s the guy in whom we’d have far greater trust on the economy, energy, healthcare and foreign policy.
As for McCain, we can go into his past and detail his fondness for industry lobbyists. We can go into his neoconservative, imperialist views on foreign policy that would absolutely be a continuation of the past eight years. We can cite our concerns about how he was once rightly against the Bush tax cuts before he was wrongly for them.
But we’ll simply point to a couple of recent decisions his campaign made. The first was his choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate. It was a cynical move to shore up the conservative Republican base, and it showed no regard for real-world possibilities—such as, What if McCain were to die or be incapacitated while in office? The second was the desperate, disgusting decision to portray Obama as a terrorist sympathizer, which is the kind of thing you do when you have nowhere else to turn, when you know you can’t capture votes on serious policy issues facing Americans.McCain would likely win this election four years ago—before the public realized how wrong the invasion of Iraq was, before the Republican Party imploded amid scandal after scandal (Cunningham, Foley, Abramoff, DeLay, Craig, Stevens, et al.), before the current president became radioactive and before the economy descended into unimaginable crisis.
So, it’s the right time for you moderate Republicans and you independents to give our guy a chance. McCain’s thinking is no different than Bush’s in the key areas—costly military interventionism, trickle-down economics and free access for lobbyists—and if you really think about it, you’ll realize that it’s unsustainable. Please vote for Barack Obama.
________________________________________
NEBRASKA REPUBLICAN SENATOR'S WIFE ENDORSES OBAMA
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The wife of Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel plans to endorse Democrat Barack Obama.
Lilibet Hagel has scheduled a 10 a.m. news conference in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday with Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of Republican President Eisenhower. Susan Eisenhower also is an Obama supporter.
Hagel, R-Neb., has made no endorsement. Lilibet Hagel said in an Associated Press interview that her decision was independent of her husband. She said she didn't know whether he would make an endorsement or whom he would support.
"You'd have to ask him," Lilibet Hagel said.
She said it will be her first endorsement of a Democrat and that perilous world conditions were a factor.
"The fact is we're in two wars, two of the longest we've ever been in. We've run up a third of our nation's debt in just the past eight years. We're in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression," she said.
The Hagels know John and Cindy McCain, and she said her endorsement was not meant to slam them.
"This isn't anti-McCain. This is pro-Obama. I'm just convinced he's the right person," she said.
The Hagels vote in Nebraska, but they have lived in Washington's Virginia suburbs since Hagel won his first Senate term in 1996.
A moderate Republican and veteran wounded in combat in the Vietnam War, Hagel has been a fierce and credible critic of the Bush administration's Iraq policies. During the summer, he accompanied Obama and Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island to Iraq and Afghanistan. He was briefly the object of speculation as a possible surprise Obama running mate selection.
The first compendium of the best endorsement editorials from many states, & the top 3 papers in Tennessee! & one by Fidel Castro & the Republicans Lugar and Hagel endorsements
[Please take the time to comment on this important article which should be sent to every racist nook-and-cranny in the 9 Battleground States, and please also post your insights at the OpEdNews site below, where they will become part of a larger dialogue]
OpEdNews
Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-2008-Election-by-Sally-Liuzzo-Prado-081011-815.html
October 12, 2008
Let us promote positive race relations instead of hate speech, especially in a presidential campaign.