Osama Bin Laden used a Q'uran book to attack us, and attack a book that hold meaning to almost
400 million Americans. The Christian Bible. We have had ties to Christianity and British Kings who
read that Bible for almost 1500 years previously. When Columbus arrived in North America he came
under a British flag under order of his Christian King. When George Washington won The American
Revolution, he was still Christian. Between George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, there were
wars within North America, with indians.
The Indians were not Christian, but I do believe they still fought for themself spiritually. After the
wars with the North American Indian, fighting along the Great Lakes of Canada separated America
from Canada. America lost the war of 1812, and proceeded to no longer advance North in fear of
future British deployment in Canada and also in fear of not knowing the exact number of Britsh
troops already in Canada. They were also in fear of how many British troops would be deployed to
Canada, and how many french would come to back them up to take back America. They had to
acknowledge Canada, and salute them as friends.
America would have lost everything, and would have no longer existed as a country - something
Osama Bin Laden is trying to exploit. Even in the 1500's - we knew the persian people existed on
the other side of what we call today "Gaza." We knew they read a different book with different
religous fortitude and followed a different set of idealogies in which were custom to their book of
Q'uran - which has existed for nearly 10,000 years.
Osama Bin Laden came to America in the 1970's and to be quite frank would stare at our toilets.
He would leave his country of Afghanistan and see what is we weren't building with Christianity, and
how it is he could build a similar set of values within his Muslim Faith in his own country. Of Persian
descent - he felt raped of his beliefs and felt as if it was America who was holding him and his
country.
He would frequent America until the late 1980's until he could form his own "government" - Al-
Qaeda. Al-Qaeda protected him within his new Muslim principles and allowed to to build a
foundation within his religion, gaining the respect of his people which he still has today. People will
fight for him in Afghanistan in belief of his principle and his ability to defend Allah. If an entire
country follows Allah, then a leader will forth come. Osama Bin Laden believes he is the leader -
although quite contradictally there is another Muslim in that country building that same democracy
with the help of what we call "United Nations." Osama Bin Laden is not part of The United Nations,
and from a North American point of view it is a matter of preference who the persian people
will follow.
Osama should be what we call in North America a Republican, and allow the current Afghani
President to be what we call a Democrat. We should cut our losses, and allow Osama to come out
of hiding to represent his government as a Republican. They will do the job we are trying to do, and
he can work within United Nations stature. If we put sanctions on them in the 1980's because we
couldn't tap their oil, then we held no water in invading Iraq in 1991, further trying to tighten our
grip on their most precious natural resouce. We have water and trees that we share freely within
North America, but they have oil in Iraq that they need to protect just as much.
They need a sustainable government and we need a system in place with the Persian people that
allows us to share our natural resources on a one to one basis, and not ten to one. We could have
brought Persia into North America in the late 1800's to do the the same job in industrializing
America as the African did. It was not "slavery." People in North America are ignorant when they
speak of slavery, on both sides of skin colour.
A white Christian man provided a hot meal of corn and potato for that African and brought them
here in our boats. We gave them a roof over their head and the ability to eat and provide for their
family, in a country with fresh water and uncut trees everywhere. It was not slavery, and I repeat
the same thing is today when you walk into a diner a pay a waitress a tip of $4.75 so that she may
go home and feed that family with minimal wage. In the 1800's, that minimal wage was that plate
of food and log cabin that family slept in, provided by his boss, and no, not his "owner." America
as a whole never embraced slavery nor did they ever say slavery existed.
It was pure hearsay and usually fictious stories that would come out of these log cabins. This is
similar to what you may hear today in the news today about high-profile people "owning" or
"taking-control" of large multi-national companies with thousands of employees and thousands of
benefit plans.
For all American's, this would provide drug and medical benefits that will bring up the overall
standard of living in The United States of America. Insurance companies may or may not provide
this service, but in the end it has to be in the form of a taxable service indefinitely. The American
government may even have to take responsiblity for this service, again in the form of taxable
service.
A percentage of payment will have to be insinuated into the American people's taxes so
that they may be able to sustain the health care options and pay the hospitals. Payment may
either go to the american government or the insurance companies, but to simplify things the
taxable payment should go to the United States government. This will allow America to streamline
all of their payments at a set percentage and allow all american health care providers to cut out the
middle-men making all this money, the big-banking insurance companies.
The American government would be a much better provider of health-care. Insurance companies
may charge more for this service, and change percentages and policies depending on their
competitor's rates.
While on the other hand, the american government can streamline payment into a small
percentage of tax and provide the exact same benefits across the board to every American
citizen. This would allow the american people to stay away or bypass all of the meddling
middle-ground fee's associated with insurance companies and their varying insurance policies.
Companies who like to take as much money as they can from the policy purchaser, at their
percentage, and keep that family broke and locked in to that percentage. Making the company
richer and the people poorer.
Using the government as well will keep America away from the inflation associated
with large increases of benefit purchases, and out of a market in which the insurance companies
are already making vast amounts of money in.
This ability to change percentage and rate bogs down the American economy and worldwide allows
international companies to intercede and compete with the same benefits that an American may or
may not be already be recieving in american insurance policy, benefit, or equity in the form of
credit or cash purchase.
Using the United States government will also provide a level of median service within a
brand-new american health-care system and will allow america to provide transparency to the
american health-care recipient in way of new monthly or yearly tax forms.
